33
1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 [email protected]

1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

1

Human Mental Abilities

Lecture 1

Leonardo GabalesGriffith-Taylor 310

9351 [email protected]

Page 2: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

2

Human Mental Abilities Intelligence or cognitive abilities…

A central aspect of Individual Differences or Differential Psychology Abilities Personality Preferences, beliefs, & tendencies, etc…

Everyone is in certain respects… (a) like all other people, (b) like some other people, (c) like no other people.

Page 3: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

3

Differential Psychology As a scientific discipline is concerned with…

Description, Explanation, & Prediction

…of reliable individual variation in human behaviour (e.g., ability test scores, responses on questionnaires, performance) rather than aggregated group differences per se

Page 4: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

4

Implicit Notions of Intelligence…

An intelligent person …

Has good problem-solving

skills

Thinks about things logically

Has a good memory

Processes information

quickly

Is highly educated

Has good reasoning skills

Is creative

Others …

Has a good store of information

Learns new things quickly

Page 5: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

5

What is intelligence?! Differences between ‘lay’ (or naïve) & scientific

approaches to understanding intelligence…

In every day life we observe, try to understand, & predict the behaviour of others

Based on… systems of culturally based beliefs & subjective evaluations of human behaviour & its potential causes

Implicit assumptions about causes of behaviour

Implicit assumptions about distributions

Page 6: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

6

‘Lay’ vs Scientific Approaches Judgments based on ‘lay’ understandings of

intelligence (& other psychological concepts) are useful in our day-to-day lives… but, are:

Imprecise Inconsistent Not useful as psychological (scientific) theories

Good news - bad news Good:

similar terminologies Bad:

similar terminologies

Page 7: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

7

What is intelligence?!

“Intelligence is a word with so many meanings that finally it has none” Charles Spearman (1927)

“Intelligence is what the tests test” e.g. Boring (1951)

Person ‘X’ is intelligent

Person ‘X’ performs well on

intelligence tests

Because …

Because …

Page 8: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

8

An “Intelligence” Test What is the capital of Turkmenistan?

Ashgabat Who wrote “At the Mountains of Madness?”

H. P. Lovecraft What is the most number of Oscars won by a film?

Name the film/films. 11: LotR: Return of the King, Titanic, and Ben-Hur

What is longest streak of consecutive NBA titles? Name the team. 8: Boston Celtics

Page 9: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

9

Intelligence is what intelligence test test?! As you can see from our “intelligence” test

there are big problems with this…

Doesn’t help our understanding of what intelligence actually is

Allows us to define intelligence as almost anything Problems with reliability and validity (which, we will

come back to later)

Page 10: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

10

Cognitive Abilities

There is a need to make a distinction between cognitive abilities & task performance

J. B. CARROLL (1993)

Cognitive tasks: ‘Any task in which correct or appropriate processing of mental information is critical to successful performance’

Cognitive ability: ‘Any ability that concerns some class of cognitive tasks, so defined’

Page 11: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

11

Intelligence as a construct Two levels:

Manifest variables – observable… What we can see (e.g., behaviour, test scores,

responses)

Latent variables – unobservable… What we infer – constructs (e.g., abilities, traits,

states)

Cognitive Ability

Task 1

Task 2

Task 3

Page 12: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

12

Constructs Theoretical (or hypothetical) terms which cannot be directly

observed, but are assumed to exist because they give rise to measurable phenomena

Constructs are not discovered, but constructed Description (& explanation) of behavioural & performance data Basis for prediction of behaviour

Constructs are defined by: Empirical indicators Relationships to other constructs Network of constructs (nomological network) = theory

THEREFORE: Theory & measurement are inextricably linked

Page 13: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

13

Psychological Assessment Psychometric tests do not provide a perfect index of cognitive ability

Behaviour (e.g., test performance) is often viewed as a function of person (e.g., cognitive ability) & situation (test context) factors

Performance in Situation X

Behaviour in Situation Y

? ?

?‘Manifest’ or observable

‘Latent’ or unobservable

Cognitive Factors

Non-Cognitive Factors

Page 14: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

14

A (Brief) History: Galton

Francis GALTON [1822-1911] – the founder of modern individual differences psychology: Developed a variety of (psychophysical)

measuring instruments (e.g., Galton whistle) Developed the first anthropometric laboratory

Data on a large number of psychological & physical measures (across a sample size of thousands) was obtained

Page 15: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

15

Galton

Drew attention to statistical distributions (esp. the Gaussian normal curve) that might describe many physical & psychological characteristics

Developed regression techniques leading to the construction of the coefficient of correlation

Pioneering research in behaviour genetics: work on regression techniques and the normal curve were combined - the concept of "regression to the mean"

Page 16: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

16

Galton

Page 17: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

17

Galton Hereditary Genius (1869) claimed that

intellectual genius tended to run in families: “I have no patience with the hypothesis that the sole

agencies creating differences between men are steady application and effort”

Inquiries into the Human Faculty … (1883) laid the foundations for a theory of cognitive abilities Claimed tests should be used to identify mental

strengths & weaknesses

Page 18: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

18

Galton Galton’s efforts to measure intelligence were

ultimately a failure:

Tests measured: body length, reaction time, visual acuity & body breadth - only RT could be regarded as anything like a cognitive ability

Failure was due to the variables selected

“All the information that reaches us passes through the avenue of the senses; the more perceptive the senses, the larger the field on which our intelligence can act”

Page 19: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

19

A (Brief) History: McKeen Cattell

James McKEEN CATTELL [1860-1944]

Main figure behind the mental testing movement during the 1890s - credited with coining the term ‘mental test’

Developed an extensive test battery - administered to many college students - included tests of RT, sensory discrimination, word associations, picture-naming speed & others

Page 20: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

20

A (Brief) History: Wissler Clark WISSLER [1870-1947]

Attempted to associate results from tests with ‘other’ estimates of intelligence – reasoned that test scores should relate to academic performance

Conducted the first extensive application of the correlational method (1901)

Found disappointingly low correlations between test scores (including RT) & college grades

Page 21: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

21

A (Brief) History: Spearman Charles SPEARMAN [1863-1945]

One of the first to use correlation coefficients in large-scale empirical research

Developed the statistical method of factor analysis

Proposed the g-factor theory of intelligence that has supporters to this day

Page 22: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

22

A (Brief) History: Binet Alfred BINET [1857-1911]

Shifted emphasis to examine ‘higher mental processes’ - designing tests to measure ‘complex’ abilities (The Stanford-Binet IV is still used today)

An attempt to ensure ‘defective children receive the benefits of tuition’ - no clear definition regarding mental retardation - developed ‘mental age’ IQ

Page 23: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

23

A (Brief) History: Binet Tasks varied widely – although most relied on

understanding language or the ability to reason with verbal or non-verbal material

The scale & revisions formed the basis for the development of intelligence scales (both individual & group) in a number of countries & languages

Development & refinement of tests was accompanied by evolution of statistical techniques

Page 24: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

24

Defining Tests

A measure of a sample of behaviour

Since one sample is likely to provide an unreliable estimate - tests provide several samples of the behaviour of interest (i.e., items)

The final measure is some function of an individual's response (i.e., appropriately marked items)

Page 25: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

25

Test Items

To provide a meaningful estimate of the behaviour of interest, items should be based on:

Some meaningful theory about the nature of cognition (cognitive tests)

Drawn from a well-defined domain (achievement tests)

Page 26: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

26

Uses of Tests

“Mental tests are psychology’s greatest contribution to society” (Anastasi & Urbina, 1999)

Tests are employed in many areas, including: Education Personnel selection Clinical assessment

Page 27: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

27

Criticisms of Tests During the 1970s, mental testing came

under attack by social scientists

The main criticisms concerned: Bias in psychological test The static nature of intelligence test scores

Page 28: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

28

Bias in Testing

Significant differences between groups: Racial differences - black vs. white Gender differences - male vs. female Age differences - young vs. old Socio-economic differences - rich vs. poor

CLAIM: differences b/w groups are not real, BUT … a consequence of bias in mental tests

Page 29: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

29

Bias in Testing A large number of studies examining the

issue of bias were conducted during the 1980s

It is now generally accepted that:

Most tests when used appropriately contain little bias

Psychometric tests don’t hurt people - people hurt people

Other assessments proposed as replacements for psychological tests often demonstrate more bias

Page 30: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

30

Static Nature of Test Scores

Psychometric tests provide only a single score - the final outcome of a problem solving process

This score is the sum of coded answers to test items & places an individual relative to others taking the same test

Page 31: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

31

Static Nature of Test Scores This score has nothing to say about:

The way a person thinks The steps underlying the solution process The nature of cognitive processing employed

This line of criticism has prompted: New ways of testing intelligence (e.g., adaptive

testing, dynamic assessments) Theory (rather than operationally) based

psychometric test paradigms

Page 32: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

32

Summary Intelligence as a latent construct…

The distinction between cognitive abilities & cognitive task performance

Theory development is linked to greater sophistication in assessment/measurement

Psychometric tests contain little bias when used appropriately & represent better options in assessment than alternatives

Page 33: 1 Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au

33

Think about how stupid the average person is; now realise half of them are dumber than that. (George Carlin)