Upload
tyrone-davidson
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Culture and the Web
Does Culture make a Difference in Web Usability? Presentation to MRIA-Ottawa – May 18, 2006
2
Today’s Presentation
• Inspired by testing many government websites across Canada and around the world among different cultural groups
• An informal observation: perception, usability, and satisfaction on the same websites were strikingly different among different groups....does one’s culture explain this?
• Case Studies; then you be the judge!
3
“Culture” is broader than Ethnic Group
....the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group - Webster’s Dictionary
....the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group - Webster’s Dictionary
Age groups and gender also form “cultures”
4
The Most Insidious Characteristic of Culture…
SharedShared
PatternedPatterned
Learned Learned
Mutually constructe
d
Mutually constructe
dSymbolicSymbolic
ArbitraryArbitrary
InternalizedInternalized
5
Culture is internalized.Your culture surrounds you. You take it for granted.
6
So, is that an issue when designing (or testing)
websites?
Let’s see.
7
Canadian Government Web Presence Abroad
Some Context: • More than 250 Canadian Government websites
targeting foreign audiences, leading to:• an inconsistent GoC presence and message• a difficult user experience• multiple sources of similar content• major difficulties in content management
8
Qualitative Research
Participation in Consultations
Location # of Sessions
# of Participants(all groups)
Headquarters (Ottawa) 3 17
Washington D.C. (WSHDC) 4 34
Buffalo (BFALO) 2 17
Los Angeles (LNGLS) 2 12
Mexico City (MXICO) 2 14
Guatemala City (GTMLA) 2 14
Brasilia (BRSLA) 1 9
New Delhi (DELHI) 4 29
Tokyo (TOKYO) 4 32
Beijing (BEJING) 4 28
Paris (PARIS) 2 12
Rome (ROME) 1 7
Berlin (BRLIN) 4 19
Cairo (CAIRO) 1 8
TOTAL 36 ***
Some cautions:
• Locally-engaged staff at missions cannot be considered ‘typical’, and exhibit traits of both Canadian and local cultures
• Canada-based staff prone to dominate mixed discussion groups (if allowed) • Groups moderated in English or French, so many locally engaged dealing in second language
• Large-post bias (except GTMLA)
• Standard limitations on qualitative research
9
Some Usability Issues Consistent Across Groups
10
Some Usability Issues Consistent Across Groups
Multiple buttons for similar tasks
Multiple buttons for similar tasks
Right bar/left bar navigation is confusing –
Users don’t (easily) read what’s on the right
Right bar/left bar navigation is confusing –
Users don’t (easily) read what’s on the right
Canada Wordmark and CLF provide security
Canada Wordmark and CLF provide security
11
Multiple Experience and Interpretations of Same Sites (1)
Group #1 :•Easy to read. Easy to find info with left bar navigation. Complete most tasks in 3-4 clicks. Very easy to use site.•Also, liked Canadian imagery, red on white, felt ‘at home’• “Not too busy”
Group 1: English Canadian
Group #2:• More difficulty in finding information sought (same info).• Felt ‘restrained’ by all buttons on left side.• Viewed ‘red on white’ has “aggressive” and “difficult to read”•“Somewhat boring”
Group 2: Latin/Italian Origin
12
Multiple Experience and Interpretations of Same Sites (2)
Group #1 :•Easy to navigate and find what you need. Clear choices. • Canada is inclusive. Diverse.• It’s clean. Clear.• Colorful – maybe too much so.
Group 1: Anglo – Saxons (Northern Europe, US, Canada)
Group #2:• Technologically backward (no flash, XML, etc.)• Too many useless buttons • Boring. White• Photos are tacky. Passé.
Group 2: Most groups
13
Can we agree on Best Practice?
Group #1 :• Clean, clear. Uncluttered • Very easy to find what your looking for.• Soothing• Conservative. Credible.• Rotating pictures (flash) communicates innovativeness.
Group 1: US, Germany, France, Canada-based staff
Group #2:• BORING! • Austere, stern, unfriendly• Where do I go? Where would I start?
Group 2: Italy, Latin America
14
Do different cultures perform tasks differently?
Example Journeys:• Find information on
Pierre Elliott Trudeau for my history class;
• Find available subsidies for artists;
• Find export financing for arts and culture.
Example Journeys:• Find information on
Pierre Elliott Trudeau for my history class;
• Find available subsidies for artists;
• Find export financing for arts and culture.
15
Two Approaches
• Group 1:• Type in keywords into search bar• Seek match on first page• Click on closest match• Evaluate
• Group 2:• Look for closest match to keyword in left hand navigation
column• Click on closest match• Click on closest match again• Click back, forth and circle until found.
16
Two Approaches
• Group 1: Youth Aged 14-18• Type in keywords into search bar• Seek match on first page• Click on closest match• Evaluate
• Group 2: Adults Aged 30+• Look for closest match to keyword in left hand navigation
column• Click on closest match• Click on closest match again• Click back and forth. • Evaluate
Explanations Please?
17
Do different cultures look at a site differently?
We observed no major deviation from the “F” pattern across any cultures (for languages reading left-to-right)
Source: Nielsen, Jakobhttp://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html
18
Bringing it all Together….
• Every individual interacts with a website through his/her own ‘cultural lenses’.
• Remember, ethnicity is only one dimension of culture. Age, gender, and social group are just examples of other cultural ‘groups’.
19
Culture appears to have less influence.....
• in requiring ease of use, few clicks, and increasing demands for website performance
• in how a website is scanned (F-pattern, or mirror image)
• in aversion to too many options, choices, buttons or places to go – everyone appears to like simplicity
20
Where Culture and Usability Intersect
Some aspects of web design and usability are more ‘culturally sensitive’ than others:
• use and mix of colour (or ‘color’ if I’m addressing a US audience)
• spatial orientation and use of white space (clean vs. busy)
• text per page and text vs. pictures• use of movement (e.g. flash images)
Overall, user friendliness starts by “feeling at home”.
21
The Web Designers’ Dilemma - At Home or Just Visiting?
The “Home Away from Home”
• Understand which aspects of ‘your’ culture appeal to your audience, and which are different
• Communicate clearly that the visitor is visiting through CLF/brand
• Communicate your message using local cultural cues – make the user “feel at home”
22
Practically speaking…some tips
• Above all, remember you internalize your culture!
• Don’t overreact to cultural differences. Your audience is also expecting a “different” cultural experience on your site.
• Untangle global and local content by creating a clear framework
and permitting design flexibility within it
• Maintain single authoritative sources for content, then adapt for targeted audience. Don’t let the cart lead the horse.
• Test cultural assumptions during the design phase. Remember the cultural variable during the usability testing phase. Ask about culture...it’s not taboo!
23
Recommended reading and references
• Best Practices in Web Globalization – Lionbridge Technologies Inc.
• Barber and Badre, “Culturability: The Merging of Culture and Usability”
Available on www.antima.ca
Click on “Innovative Approaches”
24
Questions & Discussion