30
8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia 8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, “Classicalization” vs. Quantization of Tachyonic Dynamics Goran S. Djordjević In cooperation with D. Dimitrijević and M. Milošević Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics University of Niš Serbia 8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

“ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of Tachyonic Dynamics

  • Upload
    nowles

  • View
    32

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

“ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of Tachyonic Dynamics. Goran S. Djordjević In cooperation with D. Dimitrijević and M. Milošević Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics University of Niš Serbia. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

“Classicalization” vs. Quantization of Tachyonic Dynamics

Goran S. DjordjevićIn cooperation with D. Dimitrijević and M. Milošević

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics

University of NišSerbia

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING:Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Page 2: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Outline

• Tachyons, introduction and motivation• p-Adic inflation, strings and cosmology

background• Tachyons – from field theory to the

classical analogue – “classicalization”• DBI and canonical Lagrangians• Classical and Quantum dynamics in a

zero-dimensional mode• Equivalency and canonical transformation• Instead of a Conclusion

Page 3: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Introduction

• Quantum cosmology - to describe the evolution of the universe in a very early stage.

• Related to the Planck scale - various geometries (nonarchimedean, noncommutative …).

• “Dark energy” effect - expansion of the Universe is accelerating.

• Different inflationary scenarios.

• Despite some evident problems such as a non-sufficiently long period of inflation, tachyon-driven scenarios remain highly interesting for study.

Page 4: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic inflation from p-strings

• p-Adic string theory was defined (Volovich, Freund, Olson (1987); Witten at al (1987,1988)) replacing integrals over R (in the expressions for various amplitudes in ordinary bosonic open string theory) by integrals over , with appropriate measure, and standard norms by the p-adic one.

• This leads to an exact action in d dimensions, , .

,1

1

2

1 142

42

22

pm

p

s

pexd

g

mS p

t

Page 5: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic inflation (from strings)

• The dimensionless scalar field describes the open string tachyon.

• is the string mass scale and • is the open string coupling constant • Note, that the theory has sense for any integer and

make sense in the limit

sm

sg

1p

1

11 2

22

p

p

gg sp

.ln

2 22

p

mm sp

Page 6: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic inflation

• Potential:• Rolling tachyons

V

-1 1

0.2

0.4

p =19

12

2

4

1

1

2

1 p

p

s

pg

mV

Page 7: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Tachyons

• String theory• A. Sen’s effective theory for tachyonic field:

• - tachyon field• - potential• Non-standard type Lagrangian

1 ( ) 1 ijnS d xV T g T Ti j

g

( )T x

)(TV

00g 1 , ,...,1 n

Page 8: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

In general

• DBI Lagrangian:

• Equation of motion (EoM):

• EoM for spatially homogenous field:

( , ) ( ) 1tach T T V T g T T L L

22

1(1 ( ) )

1 ( ) ( )

T T dVg T T T

T V T dT

21 1( ) ( )

( ) ( )

dV dVT t T t

V T dT V T dT

Page 9: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

In general

• Lagrangian for spatially homogenous field:

• Conjugated momentum:

• Conserved Hamiltonian:

2( , ) ( ) 1tach T T V T T L

2( )

1tach T

P V TT T

L

2 2( , ) ( )tach T P P V T H

( , )0tach Td P

dt

Hd

Page 10: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Relation with cosmology

• Lagrangian (again):

• Cosmological fluid described by the tachyonic scalar field:

• Energy density and pressure:( )

tach

V T

1 T T

p L

p w w const

2( , ) ( ) 1tach T T V T T L

Page 11: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Canonical transformation

• How to quantize the system – Archimedean vs non-Archimedean case!?

• Classical canonical transformation

• Form of the generating function:

• - new field, - old momentum

2 ( , ) ( )F T P PF T

T P

Page 12: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Canonical transformation

• Connections:

• Jacobian:

• Poisson brackets:

2

2

( )

( )

FT F T

P

F dF TP P

T dT

1( )

1

( )

T F T

P PdF TdT

2

1( , )

11( , )

0

F F PT P FJT P

F

. . . .{ , } { , } 1P B P BT P T P

Page 13: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Canonical transformation

• Hamiltons’ equations:

• EoM:

2 2 2

2 22 2 2 2

1

1 1 ( )( )

PT

F P F V

dV FP F V F P

F dFP F V

2log ( ) 1 log ( )0

F d V F d V FT F T

F dF F dF

Page 14: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

(smart) Choice for

• If is integrable:

• lower limit of the integral is chosen arbitrary

• Second term in the EoM vanishes:

( )F T

1( )V T

1( )( )

T dTF T

V T

log ( )0

F d V FF

F dF

Page 15: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

(smart) Choice for

• EoM:

• Two mostly used potentials:

( )F T

1 log ( )0

d V FT

F dF

( ) TV T e

1( )

cosh( )V T

T

Page 16: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Example 1

• Exponential potential: • Function becomes• Leads to• Full generating function:

• EoM:• Classically equivalent (canonical) Lagrangian:

( ) ,TV T e const 1( )F T 1 1

( ) TF T e

1

( ) ln( )F T T

2 ( , ) ( ) ln( )P

F T P PF T T

2 0T T

2 2 21 1( , )

2 2quad T T T T L

Page 17: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Example 2

• “One over cosh” potential:

• Leads to

• Full generating function:

• EoM:• Classically equivalent (canonical) Lagrangian:

1( ) ,

cosh( )V T const

T

1( ) arcsinh( )F T T

2 ( , ) ( ) arcsinh( )P

F T P PF T T

2 0T T

2 2 21 1( , )

2 2quad T T T T L

Page 18: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic case, numbers…

• p – prime number• - field of p-adic numbers

• Ostrowski: Only two nonequivalent norms over and

• Reach mathematical analysis over

pQ

QRQ ||||

pQQ p ||

||||

Q| |p

pQ

pb

ap p||

Page 19: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

``Non-Archimedean`` – p-adic spaces

• Compact group of 3-adic integers Z3 (black dotes)

• The chosen elements are mapped (R)

Page 20: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic QM

• Feynman’s p-adic kernel of the evolution operator operatora

• Aditive character – • Rational part of p-adic number – • Semi-classical expression also hold in the p-adic

case

)()0,;,(0

T

pp LdtDyyTyK

)}{2exp()( pp xix

px}{

1/22 2

2 1 2 12 1 2 1

1( , ; ,0) ( , ; ,0)

2( )c c

p p p c

p

S SK y T y S y T y

y y y y

Page 21: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic QM

• Lagrangian:

• Action:

• - elapsed time• Initial and final configuration: ,

2 22 1 1 2 1 2( , , ,0) coth( ) 2 csch( )

2cS y T y y y T y y T

2 2 21 1( , )

2 2y y y y L

T1y 2y

Page 22: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic QM

• The propagator:

• Group property (evolutionary chain rule or Chapman-Kolmogorov equation) holds in general:

– (Reminder: the infinitesimal version of this expression is the celebrated Schrödinger equation).

3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 3 1 1( , ; , ) ( , ; , ) ( , ; , )p

p p pQK y T y T K y T y T dy K y T y T

/

( , ; , )( ) ( )

coth( ) ( )

( )

( )

1 2

p 2 1 p

p

2 2p 1 2 1 2

K y T y 02sinh T sinh T

y y T 2y y csch T2

Page 23: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic QM ground state

• The necessary condition for the existence of a p-adic (adelic) quantum model is the existence of a p-adic quantum-mechanical ground (vacuum) state:

• Characteristic function of p-adic integers:

1, if | | 1(| | )

0, if | | 1p

pp

yy

y

( ) (| | )vacp py y

Page 24: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic QM ground state

• Basic properties of the propagator

• Leads to

2 1 1 1 2( , ; ,0) ( ) ( )p

vac vacp p pQ

K y T y y dy y

12 1 1 2| | 1

( , ; ,0) (| | )p

p pyK y T y dy y

Page 25: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

p-Adic QM ground state

• Necessary conditions for the existence of ground states in the form of the characteristic Ω-function

• Interpretation

2 22

| | 1,( ) (| | ), for

| | 1, | | 1pvac

p pp p

Ty y

T y T

( ) ( ) ( ) (| | )a p p p pp M p M

y y y y

Page 26: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Conclusion

• Tachyonic fields can be quantized on Archimedean and non-Archimedean spaces.

• Dynamics of the systems are described via path integral approach

• Classical analogue of the tachyonic fields on homogenous spaces is inverted oscillator lake system(s), in case of exponential like potentials.

• How to calculate the wave function of the Universe with ``quantum tachyon fluid`` … ?

• ``Baby`` Universe?

Page 27: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Acknowledgement

• The financial support under the

ICTP & SEENET-MTP Network Project PRJ-09 “Cosmology and Strings” and

the Serbian Ministry for Education, Science and Technological Development projects No 176021, No 174020 and No 43011. are kindly acknowledged

• A part of this work is supported by CERN TH under a short term grant for G.S.Dj.

.

Page 28: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Reference1. G.S. Djordjevic and Lj. Nesic

TACHYON-LIKE MECHANISM IN QUANTUM COSMOLOGY AND INFLATIOin Modern trends in Strings, Cosmology and ParticlesMonographs Series: Publications of the AOB, Belgrade (2010) 75-93

2. G.S. Djordjevic, d. Dimitrijevic and M. MilosevicON TACHYON DYNAMICSunder consideration in RRP

3. D.D. Dimitrijevic, G.S. Djordjevic and Lj. NesicQUANTUM COSMOLOGY AND TACHYONSFortschritte der Physik, Spec. Vol. 56, No. 4-5 (2008) 412-417

4. G.S. Djordjevic}}, B. Dragovich and Lj.NesicADELIC PATH INTEGRALS FOR QUADRATIC ACTIONSInfinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics Vol. 6, No. 2 (2003) 179-195

5. G.S. Djordjevic, B. Dragovich, Lj.Nesic and I.V. Volovichp-ADIC AND ADELIC MINISUPERSPACE QUANTUM COSMOLOGYInt. J. Mod. Phys. A17 (2002) 1413-1433

6. G.S. Djordjevic}}, B. Dragovich and Lj. Nesicp-ADIC AND ADELIC FREE RELATIVISTIC PARTICLEMod. Phys. Lett.} A14 (1999) 317-325

Page 29: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

Reference7. G. S. Djordjevic, Lj. Nesic and D  Radovancevic

A New Look at the Milne Universe and Its Ground State Wave FunctionsROMANIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, (2013), vol. 58 br. 5-6, str. 560-572

8. D. D. Dimitrijevic and M. Milosevic: In: AIP Conf. Proc. 1472, 41 (2012).

9. G.S. Djordjevic and B. Dragovichp-ADIC PATH INTEGRALS FOR QUADRATIC ACTIONSMod. Phys. Lett. A12, No. 20 (1997) 1455-1463

10. G.S. Djordjevic, B. Dragovich and Lj. Nesicp-ADIC QUANTUM COSMOLOGY,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Sup. 104}(2002) 197-200

11. G.S. Djordjevic and B. Dragovichp-ADIC AND ADELIC HARMONIC OSCILLATOR WITH TIME-DEPENDENT FREQUENCYTheor.Math.Phys. 124 (2000) 1059-1067

12. D. Dimitrijevic, G.S. Djordjevic and Lj. NesicON GREEN FUNCTION FOR THE FREE PARTICLEFilomat 21:2 (2007) 251-260

Page 30: “ Classicalization ” vs. Quantization of  Tachyonic  Dynamics

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia

T H A N K Y O U!