국방부 비밀문서 19690417 B52폭격검토 안치용

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 19690417 B52

    1/5

    ..!

    ..

    '.... .. .. I .. . .."'- . . . . ..

    _; .. "' - .... ""; . ,,.., . .0 ,;: , I o : "' 0 o

    ._ .' . .. .. .: .

    '' ' , o ~ : ~ - - - : . . _ , ,,.,,, 61 , , . , , , . , , , - . . . , o . . : . . ~ , ' , o 0 '' oo ""o ' o '"' ooO ---- '" '" ' '____ ..;.:,,,,,,-.,,-':.. o I

    MEMORANDUM. . . , .... OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY. ~ p

    April 17, 1969

    Or. Kissinger:Two cop Tes of the attachedmemoranda.are providad for- yourInformation.

    :. . i .

    . ' ;..... . ..

    .. . . :... ..

    I O o O 0 o 00 o I o o:: < . ~ - : - . .

    .... . . .i ;:: .. .; . ,,! . ' . I ... .. . . . ,.. . ..'l .I .t :.1 . ., ... r > .

    . . - .:.-

    . . 0

    J

    - .......... .,..

    .

    ....... .: ,.. .. .

    -V,

    ..._: .U. ....

    ...-: ... l_.,

    ' . ~ - ~ - : .. . .. ' . . . . - ~ - : : : - ... .. : ; ' j. : . . . , . . . . ...

    . ---------...,... -'.- :----,I ' .

    . u D E C ~ I F I E O . -SEP 2. 7 21Jnt!. ~ ~ ~ m y : eo 12958 . . . uoChief, Declass Br . . . , . ~ ~ a m ~ e c r ... ' .,,., Reo. WHs .. ' .

    ..:--"'-. .. . .- . . '..: , . .. .:. '. . . ir ,.:: . . . . . . . .

    . . : . -._ ._;\.'

    -- - - ~ - ..... . ""'.: . -.- .. .

    . ... : . . ...

    !. I "".

    ,.. - .. - . . :, -. :.'. .. __.- '- . . . .

    . - .. .: ....

    .I

    " !. ' "

  • 7/28/2019 19690417 B52

    2/5

    r

    ;, .q ..'I!I.,llli'Ili!!

    \ .. ..... ~ , _ , .. . .CM-4122-6917 _ !apri l 1969.. . ,.. . ..

    MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY, OF. DEFENSEw :

    SUBJECT: . Alternative Responses, EC-121 Shootdown. t . . .

    ' ,. : ' . I , . . '

    '

    I l.. The. attache.d draft'. memorandum: f o r ~ the President i s f o ~ \ . t a r d e d in response- to. a ' _ l : : e q u ~ s _ t received from Dr ... Kissinger. -... . . .2. It i s recommended. that the draf t memorandum be forwardedto the, President. . . . . . .- _ . .. , , f I _ .. ' I... #, o . !: '_ I I . , ... . . . .. .. . . . : . :. .. .. JSgd):: EARlE G. WHEELER

    - . I '.> : . . . -. . ... ~ . : . .- ... . EARLE G. wHEELER- ,. . :-. : : Chairman:":"":-:---- ~ - - : - - .......... ' ~ . , _ . _ . . - : . . . : " 'oint Chiefs of Staff- ~ - . ~ . .

    . . . . ;....- . ' .. ' , 4111

    . : r. .. "..... .

    . . :. .. . . . . . . . . .. '' . . . ' J . .. ' . . . ; i , ,. .. ... .. .... . . . - . . .. .. . ., ;

    I '. ,,: I

    .,t . . .. } . .

    DECLASSlFIEO S E ~ 2 .7. 2006,Au1horlty: E0.12958, as amended.Chief, Daclass Br. Ojr..& Ret, WHS :

    .:.

    . .

    -. . I .OSD. R .; N . . .. cr o ; . . ~ : . ; ; . ~ ... . . - . ,.

    r .

    . , .

    ..

    ......j ' !...'i

    . .: C o p y . ~ ~ - o f - - ~ - Cop;

    . Page ~ : . . . - ; of - ~ Pag

  • 7/28/2019 19690417 B52

    3/5

    .

    OSD 3 . 3 ( b ) ( ~

    : "D.,_., 'h' .1/11111::);os . ~ - ( ll-"

    IIIi..,! ,

    ? ...... ~ . . "' ..THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.' . . - . . . . WASHINGTON. D . C:. 2030! .. . . ;.. I

    .... .

    . . .... :.. : ..... . . . ...... . .

    .. ,. .

    MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT . I ; .,.: . . .. .S u b j e ~ t ; Concept and Estimates for Retal:i:atory ... .B-52 Air Strikes Against North Korean. Targets ' t !B) . . .l . This .memorandum forwards a ~ o n c e p t for e ~ p l o y m e n t

    ot a.:.52 aircraft against either one of two Nor.th Korean~ i r f i e l d s as a -response to their shoot_dowri Qtthe US~ C - 1 2 1 on 1 ~ April 1969.

    i . 2. The reeommended t ~ g e t s 1"or this c c : m c e ~ t are:

    3. Advantages of using B-52 versus carrier-based airc r a ~ t or land-based ~ a c t 1 c a l aircraft are as f o l l o ~ s :

    a. One B ~ 5 2 delivers uu to i08 bombs versus the.12 to 18 ~ e l i v e r e d by each tactical aircraft . : ; .. . r 1 b The smaller. the number of_ aircraft , the betterithe _chance for s_urprise. .. . .. .. I ..... .. . . . .. . . ..' # .. . . .. : ; .

    . . . . . . . :.".: : ~ . ; : ~ ~ ! - . : - . . . . . . . - ~ . -.. ; " ' " . " ' . : : ~ - : ~ . : : ~ : . :. ... ' .. " ; ." .. .: .. " !. . . . e : : ~ . t n j ~ \ i l ~ ' f : r . z ~ . : . .. . . . . . . . r . t ! f J . l ! * ~ l ! ? < . . ... ::_: ...... . . ..

    ' .. t

    . .. . .. DECLASSIFIED SEP 2 7 . -: : ~ m : Authority: EO 1 ~ $ . u imended .: . 'P' . . . Chief, Declus.Bri_p1r: &Rae. WHS . J <

    ...,..

  • 7/28/2019 19690417 B52

    4/5

    . ' ----------------------..... .

    ' - -

    OSD 3 . 3 ( b ) ( ~ )

    !

    e. The strike could be mounted more quickly.by 9-52sthan by land or carrier-based aircraft.f . ~ h e B-52 has a greater ECM capability than eitherof the other two forces.

    .g . The use of the B-52 as opposed to land-based_tact ical a i r permits a n i g h t ~ a l l - l . . r e a t h e r ~ .. o ~ levela t t a c k ~ thus e n h a n c i ~ g survivabil i ty.

    h. Use of B-52s preserves land based t ac t ica l .a i r inthe area for defftnse o f ROK. -,.

    D i s a d v a n t ~ g e s of using the B-52.:a, B-52 is larger and less maneuverable than tact ical

    a i r . c r ~ f t and' s o m e w ~ a t more vulnerable to barrage ant i - _aircraf t f i re . 'b . Loss of a strategic bomber might have a moredamaging. effect 0 ~ us inmge in this situation.c. Use the B-52 in relatively ciose.proximity to the S o v i e ~ . Unionm;Lght e l i c ~ t an adverse Soviet:'reaction.

    .. 5. Advantf1ges/d1sadvantages or u s i ~ g 12 versus 24"'B-52s areOSD 3.3(b)(5) a. Attack by 12 B-52ssufficient to achieve US o would be

    b. The smaller attacking.force would decrease -thetime and n u m b e ~ o r aircraft exposed and possibly reducethe risk of loss .

    DECLASSIFED SEP 2 7. 2006Authority: EO 12958, as amended ..Chief, Daclass Br, Dir. & Rec:WHS

    2.- r

    .

  • 7/28/2019 19690417 B52

    5/5

    .' .

    ... . .. .

    c. A 12 aircraft attack could be mounted slightly. . .soone1 ..d. A smaller force would have less mutual supportingcapability (ECM and defense s u p p r e s s i o n ) ~ . .

    e. Damage expectancy ~ o u l d be requced using smallerforce. 6. There are p r e ~ e n t l y 102 B-52s deployed in the Pacific)with 52 ot these at Guam. T h e ~ e are 65 K C - 1 3 5 s . d e p l o y e d ~35 of which are on Okinawa. . 7. Concept of operations would be as f o l l o ~ s ; .

    OSD 3.3(b){!5)

    8. C I : - : : ? P ~ : ? s . ~ : : i 8 : - ~ r - ~ C S i " ~ C ::c:ve been ~ e q : ~ e s t - e C . t ~ p ~ e p r : . ! ' ec p e r a ~ ~ c ~ ~ l a r . s for E-52 at tacx or. e a c ~ ~ a ~ g e t as s o c ~. as p o s s i b l e ~ a c ~ d r e s s i r : g both the s:nal:!.er a!'ld. l a ~ g e r st!"L