Residuals and Biosolids 2012 Abstract Review Sheet

Residuals and Biosolids 2012Abstracts Sorted by NumberReviewer Name:

Abstract Number

3960 Qiuyan Yuan

4034 DAVID WEBER UNITY FERTILIZER

4050 ASHOK RAO Parsons

4074 Charles Bullard

4228 Michael McFarland

4233 Bradley Mannis

4235 Jongmin Kim

4236 Jongmin Kim

4239 Jane Bahier

4241 Wayne McFarland GHD, Inc.

4242 Ron Latimer Hazen and Sawyer

4243 Charlie Liu

4244 Louis Barre MABAREX INC.

4246 Brian Hemphill

4247 Alex Ekster

4248 Giuseppe Mininni

4250 Yuanming Tsai Infilco Degremont

4253 Matthew Vanhorne Hazen and Sawyer

4254 Matt Holub

4255 Tim Evans

Author First Name

Author Last Name

Author Organization

University of Manitoba

Hazen and Sawyer, PC

Utah State UniversityMannco Environmental Services Inc

Infilco Degremont inc.

Infilco Degremont Inc.

BCM Engineers (A Division of ATC Associates)

HDR Engineering, Inc.

National Research Council

TIM EVANS ENVIRONMENT

4256 Tim Evans

4257 Megan Yoo

4258 Tim Evans

4259 Wayne McFarland

4260 Marino Curati

4262 James Newton

4265 Karen Puddephatt

4266 Marija Peric AECOM

4267 Phillip Heck

4268 Natalie Sierra

4269 Larry Ekstrom

4270 Matthew Higgins

4271 Jonathan Treadway

4272 Michael Hill

4273 David Stewart

4274 Markus Roediger

4275 William Krill

4276 Bryan Lisk Hazen and Sawyer

4277 Deborah Reid Reid & Associates

4281 Dave Dailey Metso

4283 Craig Hannah

4284 Stanley Chilson



Ryerson University

Brown and CaldwellSan Francisco Public Utilities Commission

Pierce County, Washington

Bucknell University

Wilbur Smith Associates

Dr. Roediger Consult

Brown and Caldwell

CET Engineering Services

4285 Hunter Long Hazen and Sawyer

4286 David Oerke CH2M HILL

4287 Mohammad Abu-Orf AECOM Water

4291 Melanie Solmos Verde

4293 Akshay Kumar

4294 Rhonda Bowen HRSD


4296 Frank Sapienza CDM

4297 TR Gregg

4298 Pepi Ursillo

4301 Evan Bowles Virginia Tech

4302 Bryen Woo Ovivo

4303 Alicia Gilley

4304 Bruce Bailey

4305 John Willis

4307 Ned Beecher

4308 Ritika Kacker Virginia Tech

4310 Joe Rohrbacher

4311 Ken Haggerty

4312 Gayla Fecher

4314 Walter Bashaw Jacobs

4315 Steven Reese Hazen and Sawyer

Brown and Caldwell

Huber Technology, Inc

HDR Engineering, Inc.

Metro Wastewater Reclamation District

quasar energy group

Brown and CaldwellNorth East Biosolids and Residuals Association

Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

RDP Technologies, Inc

4316 Dana Devin-Clarke

4317 Gary Newman

4318 Jinling Li Virginia Tech

4319 Jennifer Miller Virginia Tech

4320 Cornelius Strain

4321 Scott Abrams Hazen and Sawyer

4323 Robert Borneman ARCADIS, Inc.

4324 Lori Stone Black & Veatch


4326 Matthew Bentley Huber Technology

4329 Geoff Boyd

4331 Michele Kline

4332 Chamindra Dassanayake

4333 Dieter Weinert Huber Technology

4334 Michele Kline

4335 Anthony Farina Hazen and Sawyer

4336 Kemal Niksic

4337 Deborah Ross CIMA Canada Inc.

4338 Bruce Bartel GBMSD

4339 John Currie CB&I, Inc

4340 Michele Kline I. Kruger Inc.

4341 Katya Bilyk

Brown and Caldwell

Blue Water Technologies, Inc

Malcolm Pirnie, The Water Division of ARCADIS

Hatch Mott MacDonald

4343 James Rowan Black & Veatch

4344 Brian Fuchs

4345 Timothy Lindemann

4346 Drury Whitlock CH2M HILL

4347 Bruce Johnson CH2M HILL

4348 David Parry CDM

4349 Eron Jacobson

4350 Patricia Scanlan

4351 Christopher Wilson

4352 ERSIN KASIRGA Parsons

4353 John Lewis Huber Technology

4355 Gustavo Queiroz Black and Veatch

4356 Jack Moyer URS

4357 Charlotte Nytoft

4358 Karthik Kumarasamy

4359 Brandt Miller

4360 David Wingate

4361 Lisa Ochsenhirt AquaLaw PLC

4362 Robert Fowlie CDM

4363 Tania Datta CH2M HILL

4365 Theresa Bruton

4366 Natalie Sierra

W. L. Gore & Associates

Siemens Industry Inc.

Greeley and Hansen

Trade Council of Denmark

Utah State University

ARCADIS Malcolm Pirnie

4367 Germana Nunes Black & veatch

4368 John Hahn CH2M HILL

4369 Alan Grooms

4370 Richard Danielson

4371 Jack Polce

4373 Christine McCarthy

4374 Phillip Pressley

4375 Lynne Moss CDM

4376 Yuansong Wei

4377 Michael Scullion CDM

4378 Fred Mussari

4379 Philip Braswell

4380 Marti Malin-Gibson City of Raleigh


4382 Lisa Reynolds

4383 Kim Riddell

4384 Alan Grooms

4385 Sharon Paterson

4386 Jacob Porter Hazen and Sawyer


4388 Christopher Muller

4389 Yuansong Wei

Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District

BioVir Laboratories, Inc

Advanced GeoServices Corp

Kleinfelder/S E A consultants

North Carolina State Univeristy

Brown and Caldwell

Smith EnvironmentalMadison Metropolitan Sewerage District

4390 Robert Ostapczuk

4391 Laurissa Cubbage Hazen and Sawyer

4392 Christine Polo

4393 Tom Chapman


4395 Perry Schafer

4396 Richard Kelly

4397 Chul Park

4398 Sreeram Rengaraj

4399 Enrique Vadiveloo Hazen and Sawyer

4400 George Anipsitakis

4401 Bhavani Yerrapotu City Of San Jose

4404 Jennifer Callahan

4405 Coenraad Pretorius Carollo Engineers

4406 Janelle Amador CDM

4408 Michael Bruno

4409 Aaron Stephens

4410 Vamsi Seeta

4411 Charles Goss AECOM


4413 Vamsi Seeta

4414 Surendra Thakral Parsons

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.

Black & Veatch Corporation

Brown and Caldwell

Brown and Caldwell

Brown and Caldwell

Material Matters, Inc

Material Matters, Inc

Parsons Corporation

Parsons Corportion


4416 John Kabouris CH2M HILL

4417 James Smith USEPA

4418 Scott Hardy


4421 Scott Hardy


4423 Michael Gallagher

4424 Scott Vandenburgh CDM


4426 Peter Schuler

4427 Andrew Bosinger

4428 H David Stensel

4429 Robert Wimmer Black & Veatch

4430 Robert Forbes CH2M HILL


4432 Ralph Eschborn AECOM

4433 Samuel Jeyanayagam CH2M HILL


4435 Chul Park

4436 Robert Lonergan Tetra Tech, Inc

4437 Robert Lonergan



Brown and Caldwell

Synagro Technologies, Inc.

4438 Jared Alder

4439 Scott Noll

4440 Eric Lappala

4442 Wayne Parker

4443 Banu Ormeci

4444 Rusty Schroedel AECOM

4445 Ronald Alexander

4446 Tim Shea CH2MHILL

4447 Robert Reimers Tulane University


4449 Dale Gabel CH2M HILL

Arizona State University

M2 Renewables, Inc.

Eagle Resources, P.A.

Carleton University

R. Alexander Associates, Inc.


If you cannot review an abstract please enter n/a in the total score columnRating Scale of 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (excellent) - DO NOT USE ZEROS

Paper Title Topic Alternate Topic

N. A. Canada Yes

M. N. No

C. B. No

I. P. No

D. H. No

E. J. No

A. M. Yes

A. M. Yes

J. R. Canada No

C. B. No

N. Q. No

G. Q. No

C. No

A. G. No

G. I. No

A. C. Italy No

A. I. No

C. Q. Yes

P. No

Q. E. No

Country, if not U.S.

Young Professional?

WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE SOLUBILISATION WITH CHLORINE DIOXIDE

NEW NSF PRODUCT SAFETY PROTOCOL FOR PROCESSING SEWAGE SLUDGE INTO ORGANICALLY-ENHANCED GRANULAR FERTILIZER

Sustainable Biosolids Management & Renewable Energy for 21st Century

Evaluating Biosolids Management Alternatives in Northeast Tennessee: A Cooperative Masterplanning EffortCharacterizing the Risk to Groundwater Quality from Biosolids Beneficial Use Activities

Creating Public Awareness and Political SupportAn impact of iron on the digestion efficiencies and odor generation of multi stage anaerobic digestion systemA comparison of the Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion system to the single stage anaerobic digestion system: Solids reduction, Dewaterability and Odor Valoris™ : the missing link for the effective treatment of sludge and digestate

Cornell University Biomass to Energy InitiativePILOT TESTING NUTRIENT RECOVERY FROM WAS STREAMS FOR STRUVITE CONTROL AND RECYCLE LOAD REDUCTION

Unconventional Residuals Thickening and High Performance Dewatering

Garbage in, Garbage out or the importance of a clean digestate

Turbocharging A Vintage Mechanical Composting SystemInvestigation of co-thickening of primary and secondary sludges in dissolved air floatation

Assessment of pretreatments to mesophilic-thermophilic anaerobic digestion

Thermylis Advanced Controls for HTFB IncinerationGreasing the Skids: Two Case Studies of Co-Digestion and Combined Heat and Power Projects

Emergency Response for Dewatering and Transportation of Biosolids.

The phosphate crisis - biosolids' strongest case

D. N. No

Q. J. Yes

Biosolids in Europe K. E. No

Bridgeport's Sustainable Biosolids Options Q. F. No

High Voltage Disintegration C. B. No

A Sustainable Biosolids Drying Process Q. P. No

N. P. Canada Yes

C. R. No

D. L. No

J. D. Yes

K. L. No

G. R. No

O. D. No

Q. P. No

R. J. No

Efficiency of Solar Biosolids Drying R. G. Germany No

E. I. No

C. Q. No

E. P. Canada No

N. No

P. No

R. C. No

Bioassay of biosolids in an operational scale field trialKeeping a Finger on the Pulse of Our Industry: A National Survey of our Biosolids and Digester Gas Reuse Practices

Protocol development of Zea mays, Glycine max and Lumbricus terrestris to assess the potential impact of land-applied biosolids on terrestrial biotaENERGY RECOVERY FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION AS COMPARED TO ENERGY RECOVERED FROM CLOSE-COUPLED GASIFICATIONDevelopment of a Class B Land Application Program at the North Davis Sewer District (NDSD)

Does the Addition of High Strength Wastes Affect Biosolids Quality?

Biosoilds and Turf Fertilizer Phosphorus Regulation in Washington StateBelt Filter Press Dewatering Trials with Cambi Thermally Hydrolyzed Biosolids – Evaluation of Critical Performance CriteriaIf Not Land Application, Then What? Master Planning for Three Utilities Reveals Trends in Biosolids Management Across the CarolinasUnderstanding the Capability of Energy Efficient, Solar Sludge Drying for Large Treatment Facilities

Three Years Experience with the Urbana Microwave Drying System

CODIGESTION: HOW TO MAKE IT A FINANCIAL “WIN-WIN” FOR ALL PARTIESCoordinating Utility Billing Structures to Maximize the Benefit from Biogas Fueled Combined Heat and Power Systems.

Movie stars and wooden monkeys -- dealing with the "ick" factorThe Importance of Total Solisa Measurement in the Wastewater Treatment Process

The Importance of Solids Measurement in the Wastewater Treatment ProcessStaged Combustion Lowers Emissions from Multiple Hearth Furnaces At Reasonable Cost

J. A. Yes

Q. P. Yes

A. I. No

Agricultural Advantages of ATAD Biosolids D. P. No

C. J. Yes

I. P. No

M. N. No

K. P. No

G. I. No

C. B. No

N. C. Yes

L. A. No

D. N. No

C. No

O. C. No

Q. I. No

M. G. Yes

C. I. No

B. P. Canada No

A. N. No

J. O. No

P. I. No

WAS Pretreatment to Boost Volatile Solids Reduction and Digester Gas Production – Market and Technology AssessmentSUSTAINABLE (LOW ENERGY) DIGESTER LINEAR MOTION MIXING – “SHOW ME THE DATA”COMPARING THERMAL HYDROLYSIS PROCESSES (CAMBI AND EXELYS) FOR SOLIDS PROCESSING FROM BOTH SENECA AND PISCATAWAY WWTPS

Feasibility of a Brown Grease Co-Digestion Program at DC Water’s Blue Plains AWTPDesigning and Constructing a New Biosolids Composting Facility Utilizing the Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act (PPEA) in VirginiaWERF ROSI Project – Do We Need a Revised Time-Temperature Requirement to Achieve Class A Biosolids?

Can an Old MHI Meet the New EPA Sewage Sludge Incinerator Regulation?Innovative disk thickener improves performance of digester at Chiquita WRF, CAFrom Onion Waste to Onion Power: An Industrial Solution to Harvesting Power from Food WastePerformance of Acid-Gas Anaerobic Digesters for Minimization of Siloxane and Hydrogen Sulfide in the Biogas

Analysis of Nutrient Removal using Membrane Thickening Aerobic DigestionNitrate Movement in Soil Profiles after Biosolids Land Application in a Dryland Ecosystem

HIGH SOLIDS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

A CASE STUDY – WHAT ARE THE STEPS FOR SUCESSFUL CODIGESTION WITH FOOD WASTES?

Biosolids- and Yard-Waste-to-Energy Feasibility Study in St. Petersburg, FLWhat Do You Feed a Hungry Digester? Assessing the Market for Co-Digestion in Central MaineWERF ROSI Project: Effect of various Digestion and Dewatering Techniques on Dewatered Biosolids OdorsDigester Gas Energy Recovery: Deciding Between Driving Blowers or Making Electricity

AMMONIA REMOVAL FROM DIGESTER LIQUOR USING AMRHEX

MOREHEAD CITY BENEFITS FROM NEW ENHANCED DRYING TECHNOLOGY

Alternative Design Concepts for Egg-Shaped Digesters

Moving Beyond Zimpro Heat Treatment at the Dry Creek WWTP

F. Q. Yes

P. A. No

D. D. Yes

N. R. Yes

B. D. Yes

G. P. No

P. R. No

I. Q. No

N. C. No

R. No

Managing a Biosolids Processing Facility I. I. Canada No

P. C. No

C. A. No

Improved Solar Biosolids Dryers R. No

R. J. No

I. O. No

R. D. No

C. I. Canada No

I. P. No

R. P. No

Q. C. No

Q. J. Yes

A Comparative Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of Class A and Class B Biosolids Technologies CRITERIA FOR PRESCRIPTIVE DESIGN BUILD PROCUREMENT FOCUSED ON DC WATER’S BIOSOLIDS PROGRAM OBJECTIVES Effects of Long Term Application of Biosolids on Soil Carbon Sequestration in VirginiaEffect of Nanosilver and Antibiotic Loading on Fate of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Thermophilic and Mesophilic Anaerobic DigestersIncreasing Existing WWTP Capacity while Transforming Waste Sludge to a CommodityComparison of Belt Filter Press and Rotary Press Dewatering Performanceon an Aerobically Digested Primary and Secondary Sludge Blend

Start up Considerations for 2TPAD Anaerobic Digestion - A Case Study?The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts – HRSD’s Approach to Biosolids Resource Recovery Master PlanningBarriers to Biogas Utilization for Renewable Energy – What’s Keeping WWTPs from Using Biogas?

Implementation of a Medium Temperature Belt Dryer in North Carolina to Produce Class A Biosolids

Successful application of the first EXELYS™ continuous thermal hydrolysis system in an operational WWTP in DenmarkBenefits of Sludge Lysis (Crown® Biogest®, Eimco® Sonolyzer) on Co-digestion, Dewaterability and Reaching Net-Zero Energy Status at WWTP Facilities

Rethinking an old technology – new digester design reduces CAPEX and OPEX

Reinventing Your Residuals Management Approach during Disaster RecoveryDon't waste your waste! Recycling Sewage Sludge for Land Application! Thermally Treated Sewage Sludge System for Pathogen removal

Maximizing Energy Recovery from SludgeKitchener WWTP Case Study

EXPERIENCES WITH SOLIDS HANDLING OF BIOSOLIDS FROM TWO FACILITIESCOMPARISON OF CLASS A SYSTEMSSMALL DIGESTER FACILITIESEnhanced digestion with EXELYS™-DLD – a direct pathway to a sustainable and cost effective wastewater treatment plant

Dewatering Sidestream Treatment: Alternatives for Increased Nutrient Recovery and

R. J. No

Q. P. No

N. P. Yes

P. I. No

G. P. No

C. N. No

C. F. Yes

C. Q. No

A. M. Yes

M. D. No

G. P. No

Q. C. Yes

D. O. No

H. H. No

D. Q. Yes

I. P. Yes

A. I. Yes

K. No

L. No

L. P. Yes

I. P. No

D. H. No

GOING WATERLESS FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE INCINERATORS – CAN IT BE DONE?Development of a Biosolids Composting Facility for Meeting Strict Compliance Standards for PFRP, VAR, Odor Control and VOC Emissions A Decade of Cannibal Biosolids Reduction - What 10 years of Research and Operations Have RevealedCHALLENGES FACED AND SOLUTIONS FOUND DURING THE SALT LAKE CITY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY ANAEROBIC DIGESTER UPGRADEInnovations for Optimizing Centrifuge Solids Dewatering of Undigested and Separated Primary and Thickened Waste Activiated Biosolids

Pyrolysis of Dried Biosolids for Increased Biogas ProductionTAKING YOUR DIGESTER GAS ON THE ROAD: THE CASE TO UPGRADE DIGESTER GAS FOR VEHICLE FUELOptimizing the Value of Your Biogas – Irvine Ranch Water District’s Drive for Energy BalanceControl of Ammonia Sensitivity in Thermophilic and High Solids Anaerobic DigestionEstimating Odor Emission Rates From Dewatered Lime Stabilized Biosolids and Thermally Hydrolyzed Biosolids, A Case Study at Blue Plains AWTP

Inline Sludge Screens - municipal and industrial applicationsBEST OF BOTH WORLDSEfficiently Managing C for Energy Optimization

When Your Cup Runneth Over --Lessons Learned in Recovering from a Biosolids Crisis at theGeoEnviron by GEOKON: One of the most comprehensive Environmental Data Management Systems in the worldECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY BY USING SITE BASED MULTIMEDIA, MULTIPATHWAY MODELING APPROACHImpacts of Water Treatment Plant Residuals on Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Programs - A Case StudyTo Foam or Not To Foam: Evaluating Causes for ATAD Foaming at Tacoma’s Central Treatment Plant

Update: Key Developments in Biosolids Management PolicyMarketability and Selective Recovery Methods for Concentrate Brine and Salts from Brackish Water Desalination

BIOSOLIDS COMPOST…WHAT’S IT WORTH?Debottlenecking Anaerobic Digester Capacity – Sometimes WAS Thickening Isn’t Enough

Fundamentals of Biosolids Land Application

R. G. Canada Yes

C. R. Yes

N. B. No

M. N. No

C. L. No

O. P. No

J. C. Yes

M. No

J. China No

G. J. Yes

A. M. No

C. L. No

H. No

I. K. No

P. No

L. I. No

B. N. No

B. M. No

P. No

I. Q. Yes

C. I. No

F. B. China No

Mercury Reduction at the Largest Municipal Incineration Facility in North America

Innovative Partnerships Lead to Incinerator OptimizationREDUCING BIOSOLID PHOSPHORUS BY EFFICIENT RELEASE AND HARVESTING OF PHOSPHORUSDemonstration of a Process to Further Reduce Pathogens in Biosolids: Wenatchee Biosolids Treatment MethodBIOSOLIDS WASTE CONVERTED TO RENEWABLE ENERGY, FERTILIZER AND CLEAN WATERBIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT in CAPE CORAL, FLORIDA: OPPORTUNITIES AND LESSONS LEARNEDA Review of Biosolids Gasification: Environmental Benefits and Challenges of ImplementationKeeping it Within the Fence: Dispersion Modeling, Piloting, and Innovation Help the City of Bryan, Texas Control Dewatering Odors

Comparison of Microwave and its Combined Methods on Removal of NP and NP1,2EOs in Sewage Sludge

Biosolids Dewatering Alternatives for Orange County, FloridaSludge Pre-treatment to Enable Accelerated Composting of Waste Activated SludgeEconomic Modelling of Combined Heat and Power System Provides Multiple Benefits VARIANCE FROM GROUNDWATER MONITORING - $74M, AAA BOND RATING – $5M PER RATING CHANGE, VALUE OF HAVING A CERTIFIED NBP EMS - MACT 129 SSI RULE IMPLEMENTION- WHAT ACTIONS ARE NEEDED NOW TO CONTINUE WITH AN SSI?

Finding the Appropriate Level of Prescriptiveness for a Large Wastewater Design-Build Project

Class A Biosolids... Sorry We're All Sold OutREDUCING BIOSOLID PHOSPHORUS BY EFFICIENT RELEASE AND HARVESTING OF PHOSPHORUS

Benefits from Real-time Odor Monitoring of Composting SitesA Distributed Residuals Master Plan for a Utility with Multiple Small Treatment Facilities

Coming Full Circle: A Biosolids Energy Balance and Benchmarking ModelEvaluating the Effect of Operating Conditions on the Energy Potential from Anaerobic DigestersReduction of Greenhouse gas emission and Conservation of nitrogen and phosphorus during swine manure composting

C. E. No

G. I. Yes

R. C. Yes

A. P. Yes

K. P. No

J. N. No

P. I. Yes

N. C. No

P. P. No

Q. J. No

B. P. No

I. P. No

L. C. Yes

B. C. No

C. No

P. J. No

D. P. No

K. C. No

R. I. No

C. Q. No

C. P. No

J. No

Biogas Recovery and Energy Production Potential in New York StateProcess Assessment to Performance Testing: Transitioning from Plate and Frame to High Solids Centrifuge DewateringEnergy, Fuels, and Chemical Recovery from Biomass and Biosolids – A State of the Art Review of Developed and Emerging Thermal Conversion 20 YEARS OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH SUBMERGED FIXED-COVER DESIGNS PROVE VALUE OF ORIGINAL DESIGN CONCEPTS

Can a New FBI Meet the New EPA Sewage Sludge Incinerator Regulations?Considerations in Using Thermal Hydrolysis for Pre-Digestion Processing in North America

High Solids Loading for a DAFT Retrofit for Co-Thickening OperationImproving the digestibility of micro green algae by anaerobic co-digestion with waste activated sludge

Changing Treatment Trains - Impact on Existing Residuals FacilitiesA Theoretical and Practical Evaluation of Struvite Control and Recovery: Two Case StudiesDemonstration Trials of A Rotating Belt Filter Screen at Two Beef Slaughterhouse FacilitiesMODELING OF THE MESOPHILIC DIGESTION PROCESS AT THE SAN JOSE/SANTA CLARA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT

Biosolids Pellets Marketability as a Supplemental Biomass Fuel

Increasing Digester Gas Production Using Residual Syrup

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION AND ENERGY RECOVERY FROM FOOD WASTE

Extreme cost savings at extreme depth: Geothermal treatment of biosolidsBiosolids management changes undertaken at the Neuse River Wastewater Treatment Plant

Significance of Legislative and Regulatory Considerations in Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies at WWTPs in California

AN ISLAND WIDE APPROACH FOR BIOSOLIDS PROCESSING – A FOCUS ON ENERGY AND SOLIDS MINIMIZATION AT OAHU, HIBurning through the FOG: City of Bellingham’s Approach to Grease Recovery and Beneficial Use

Pre-selection of Renewable Power Generation System for City of Visalia, CA – Challenges in a Volatile Regulatory Environment

Technology Selection and Application for Enhancing Anaerobic Digestr Perfromance for the Water Conservation Plant, Visalia, CA

C. No

C. P. No

K. M. No

C. Q. No

A. C. No

P. C. No

P. C. No

C. No

Finding the Limits of FOG Co-Digestion N. C. No

Q. F. No

Biogas Use in Chapel Hill, North Carolina C. O. No

I. Q. No

C. C. No

I. No

O. E. No

I. O. No

C. Q. No

J. Q. No

C. I. No

N. A. No

Q. K. Yes

Q. K. Yes

FOG - A Proven High Effciency Renewable Energy Souce, Not a NuisanceCodigestion of FOG & HSW with Biosolids in North America – Design and Operational Practices and PerformanceControlling Pathogens and Stabilizing Sludge/Biosolids: A Global Perspective of where we are today and where we need to go

Try Before You Buy – Bench-Scale Digestion Evaluation of Potential Co-Digestion Waste StreamsGlobal Development of the ATAD Process and its Significant Achievements in Energy Recovery and UtilizationLessons Learned in Design and Commissioning of Digester Gas CHPEnergy Recovery Projects in a Design/Build Project DeliveryEnergy Conservation and Recovery in Wastewater Treatment & Biosolids Management: An International Perspective

Focused-Pulsed Treatment of Waste Activated Sludge at the Racine Wastewater Treatment Plant

Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Disposal

Municipal Biosolids Management Trends, Does the Triple Bottom Line Still Matter?

USE OF ADM1 TO EVALUATE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTETHE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL: REJUVENATION OF A DYING BIOSOLIDS TREATMENT SYSTEMThe Changing Landscape of Biosolids Management in North Carolina -A Summary of the 21st Century’s First Decade and Predicted Trends for the Next

INNOVATIVE DESIGN IMPLEMENTS A DECADE LONG BIOSOLIDS MASTER PLAN Bergen County Utilities Authority Digests Cheese Whey, Gets Gas:An Energy - Community Win-WinNutrient Recovery, an Emerging Component of a Sustainable Biosolids Management Program

IF YOU BUILD IT WILL THEY COME; CO-DIGESTION OF HIGH STRENGTH WASTESSludge refreshment in the anaerobic side-stream recirculation process: the role of extracellular polymeric substances

Effluent Heat Recovery for Sustainable Biosolids Stabilization Processes

Effluent Heat Recovery for Sustainable Biosolids Stabilization Processes

N. C. Yes

C. R. No

D. K. No

A. N. Canada No

N. G. Canada No

C. I. No

L. P. No

ARE WE OVER-MIXING OUR DIGESTERS? I. P. No

J. E. No

L. P. No

A. I. No

Comprehensive review of anaerobic pretreatment technologies for municipal solid waste anaerobic digestionAn Energy and Economic Comparison of Anaerobic Digestion vs. Ultra-High Temperature Gasification to Achieve Zero EnergyMethodology for Selecting Fields to Resume Application of Biosolids at the City of Raleigh, NC Neuse River Wastewater Treatment PlantAnaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) for sludge digestion: TWAS versus mixed sludge

Determination of Residual Polymer Concentration Using UV/Visible Spectroscopy

An Assessment of Cogeneration Alternatives: Planning for the FutureKey Factors in Building a Successful Biosolids Marketing and Distribution Program

Future Directions Biosolids Management and Assessment ofThe Second Decade of the 21st Century

Biosolids Product Success Stories from the North Carolina Triangle Region

PRIMARY FERMENTER IMPACTS ON BIOGAS PRODUCTION AND COGENERATION


Originality Status Quality Comments

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Technical Content

Benefits and Significance

TOTAL RATING: (Max 25)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Residuals and Biosolids 2012Abstracts Sorted by TopicReviewer Name:

Abstract Number Author First Name Author Last Name Author Organization

4235 Jongmin Kim Infilco Degremont inc.

4236 Jongmin Kim Infilco Degremont Inc.

4246 Brian Hemphill HDR Engineering, Inc.

4248 Giuseppe Mininni

4250 Yuanming Tsai Infilco Degremont

4287 Mohammad Abu-Orf AECOM Water

4312 Gayla Fecher RDP Technologies, Inc

4351 Christopher Wilson Greeley and Hansen

4360 David Wingate

4378 Fred Mussari

4393 Tom Chapman


4442 Wayne Parker

4449 Dale Gabel CH2M HILL

4311 Ken Haggerty

4320 Cornelius Strain

4384 Alan Grooms

4385 Sharon Paterson

4400 George Anipsitakis Brown and Caldwell

National Research Council

Blue Water Technologies, Inc


4405 Coenraad Pretorius Carollo Engineers

4050 ASHOK RAO Parsons

4241 Wayne McFarland GHD, Inc.

4244 Louis Barre MABAREX INC.


4260 Marino Curati

4266 Marija Peric AECOM

4276 Bryan Lisk Hazen and Sawyer

4293 Akshay Kumar Brown and Caldwell

4298 Pepi Ursillo HDR Engineering, Inc.

4304 Bruce Bailey quasar energy group

4310 Joe Rohrbacher Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

4332 Chamindra Dassanayake

4337 Deborah Ross CIMA Canada Inc.

4348 David Parry CDM

4349 Eron Jacobson

4350 Patricia Scanlan

4368 John Hahn CH2M HILL

4371 Jack Polce

4379 Philip Braswell Brown and Caldwell


Malcolm Pirnie, The Water Division of ARCADIS

Advanced GeoServices Corp

4390 Robert Ostapczuk Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.

4406 Janelle Amador CDM


4413 Vamsi Seeta Parsons Corportion


4416 John Kabouris CH2M HILL

4418 Scott Hardy Hazen and Sawyer, PC

4423 Michael Gallagher

4426 Peter Schuler Brown and Caldwell

4428 H David Stensel

4432 Ralph Eschborn AECOM


4439 Scott Noll M2 Renewables, Inc.

4444 Rusty Schroedel AECOM

4228 Michael McFarland Utah State University

4256 Tim Evans

4267 Phillip Heck Brown and Caldwell

4291 Melanie Solmos Verde

4303 Alicia Gilley

4318 Jinling Li Virginia Tech

4356 Jack Moyer URS


Metro Wastewater Reclamation District

4358 Karthik Kumarasamy Utah State University

4366 Natalie Sierra

4409 Aaron Stephens Material Matters, Inc

4440 Eric Lappala Eagle Resources, P.A.

4233 Bradley Mannis

4275 William Krill Brown and Caldwell

4277 Deborah Reid Reid & Associates

4316 Dana Devin-Clarke

4389 Yuansong Wei

4243 Charlie Liu

4247 Alex Ekster

4270 Matthew Higgins Bucknell University

4297 TR Gregg Huber Technology, Inc

4321 Scott Abrams Hazen and Sawyer

4347 Bruce Johnson CH2M HILL

4353 John Lewis Huber Technology

4377 Michael Scullion CDM

4391 Laurissa Cubbage Hazen and Sawyer

Mannco Environmental Services Inc

BCM Engineers (A Division of ATC Associates)

4357 Charlotte Nytoft

4380 Marti Malin-Gibson City of Raleigh

4074 Charles Bullard Hazen and Sawyer, PC

4294 Rhonda Bowen HRSD


4329 Geoff Boyd

4335 Anthony Farina Hazen and Sawyer

4338 Bruce Bartel GBMSD

4359 Brandt Miller ARCADIS Malcolm Pirnie

4365 Theresa Bruton



4401 Bhavani Yerrapotu City Of San Jose

4427 Andrew Bosinger



4446 Tim Shea CH2MHILL

4239 Jane Bahier

4268 Natalie Sierra

4285 Hunter Long Hazen and Sawyer

Trade Council of Denmark

Synagro Technologies, Inc.

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

4314 Walter Bashaw Jacobs

4374 Phillip Pressley

4376 Yuansong Wei

4395 Perry Schafer Brown and Caldwell


4433 Samuel Jeyanayagam CH2M HILL

4447 Robert Reimers Tulane University

4258 Tim Evans

4269 Larry Ekstrom


4361 Lisa Ochsenhirt AquaLaw PLC


4410 Vamsi Seeta Parsons Corporation


4302 Bryen Woo Ovivo

4362 Robert Fowlie CDM

4363 Tania Datta CH2M HILL

4383 Kim Riddell Smith Environmental

4404 Jennifer Callahan Material Matters, Inc


North Carolina State Univeristy


Pierce County, Washington



4034 DAVID WEBER UNITY FERTILIZER


4308 Ritika Kacker Virginia Tech

4352 ERSIN KASIRGA Parsons

4370 Richard Danielson BioVir Laboratories, Inc

4375 Lynne Moss CDM

3960 Qiuyan Yuan University of Manitoba

4242 Ron Latimer Hazen and Sawyer

4265 Karen Puddephatt Ryerson University

4281 Dave Dailey Metso

4301 Evan Bowles Virginia Tech

4319 Jennifer Miller Virginia Tech


4345 Timothy Lindemann Siemens Industry Inc.

4369 Alan Grooms

4397 Chul Park


4435 Chul Park

4438 Jared Alder Arizona State University



4443 Banu Ormeci Carleton University

4271 Jonathan Treadway

4305 John Willis Brown and Caldwell

4373 Christine McCarthy

4430 Robert Forbes CH2M HILL

4254 Matt Holub

4283 Craig Hannah

4315 Steven Reese Hazen and Sawyer

4317 Gary Newman Brown and Caldwell

4323 Robert Borneman ARCADIS, Inc.

4331 Michele Kline

4346 Drury Whitlock CH2M HILL

4382 Lisa Reynolds

4386 Jacob Porter Hazen and Sawyer

4396 Richard Kelly Brown and Caldwell

4398 Sreeram Rengaraj

4408 Michael Bruno

4421 Scott Hardy Hazen and Sawyer, PC


Kleinfelder/S E A consultants

4255 Tim Evans

4257 Megan Yoo

4259 Wayne McFarland

4262 James Newton

4272 Michael Hill

4286 David Oerke CH2M HILL

4307 Ned Beecher

4340 Michele Kline I. Kruger Inc.

4341 Katya Bilyk

4344 Brian Fuchs W. L. Gore & Associates

4355 Gustavo Queiroz Black and Veatch

4399 Enrique Vadiveloo Hazen and Sawyer


4436 Robert Lonergan Tetra Tech, Inc

4437 Robert Lonergan

4273 David Stewart Wilbur Smith Associates

4274 Markus Roediger Dr. Roediger Consult

4284 Stanley Chilson

4326 Matthew Bentley Huber Technology

4333 Dieter Weinert Huber Technology

4334 Michele Kline


North East Biosolids and Residuals Association (NEBRA)

CET Engineering Services

4336 Kemal Niksic Hatch Mott MacDonald

4339 John Currie CB&I, Inc


4367 Germana Nunes Black & veatch

4392 Christine Polo

4411 Charles Goss AECOM

Black & Veatch Corporation


Paper Title Topic Alternate Topic Country, if not U.S.

A. M.

A. M.

A. G.

A. C. Italy

A. I.

A. I.

A. N.

A. M.

A. I.

A. M.

A. P.

A. C.

A. N. Canada

A. I.

B. P. Canada

B. D.

B. N.

B. M.

B. P.

An impact of iron on the digestion efficiencies and odor generation of multi stage anaerobic A comparison of the Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion system to the single Turbocharging A Vintage Mechanical Composting SystemAssessment of pretreatments to mesophilic-thermophilic anaerobic digestionThermylis Advanced Controls for HTFB IncinerationCOMPARING THERMAL HYDROLYSIS PROCESSES (CAMBI AND EXELYS) FOR SOLIDS MOREHEAD CITY BENEFITS FROM NEW ENHANCED DRYING TECHNOLOGYControl of Ammonia Sensitivity in Thermophilic and High Solids Anaerobic To Foam or Not To Foam: Evaluating Causes for ATAD Foaming at Tacoma’s Central Sludge Pre-treatment to Enable Accelerated Composting of Waste Activated Sludge20 YEARS OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH SUBMERGED FIXED-COVER DESIGNS Global Development of the ATAD Process and its Significant Achievements in Energy

Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) for sludge digestion: PRIMARY FERMENTER IMPACTS ON BIOGAS PRODUCTION AND COGENERATION

AMMONIA REMOVAL FROM DIGESTER LIQUOR USING AMRHEXIncreasing Existing WWTP Capacity while Transforming Waste Sludge to a CommodityREDUCING BIOSOLID PHOSPHORUS BY EFFICIENT RELEASE AND HARVESTING OF Benefits from Real-time Odor Monitoring of Composting SitesDemonstration Trials of A Rotating Belt Filter Screen at

B. C.

C. B.

C. B.

C. Canada

C. Q.

C. B.

C. R.

C. Q.

C. J.

C. B.

C.

C. I.

C. A.

C. I. Canada

C. N.

C. F.

C. Q.

C. R.

C. L.

C. L.

C. I.

Increasing Digester Gas Production Using Residual SyrupSustainable Biosolids Management & Renewable Energy for 21st Century

Cornell University Biomass to Energy InitiativeGarbage in, Garbage out or the importance of a clean digestateGreasing the Skids: Two Case Studies of Co-Digestion and Combined Heat and Power Projects

High Voltage DisintegrationENERGY RECOVERY FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION AS COMPARED TO ENERGY Coordinating Utility Billing Structures to Maximize the Benefit from Biogas Fueled Feasibility of a Brown Grease Co-Digestion Program at DC Water’s Blue Plains AWTPFrom Onion Waste to Onion Power: An Industrial Solution to Harvesting Power from HIGH SOLIDS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION Digester Gas Energy Recovery: Deciding Between Driving Blowers or Making Benefits of Sludge Lysis (Crown® Biogest®, Eimco® Sonolyzer) on Co-digestion, Maximizing Energy Recovery from SludgeKitchener WWTP Case StudyPyrolysis of Dried Biosolids for Increased Biogas ProductionTAKING YOUR DIGESTER GAS ON THE ROAD: THE CASE TO UPGRADE DIGESTER GAS FOR Optimizing the Value of Your Biogas – Irvine Ranch Water District’s Drive for Energy BalanceInnovative Partnerships Lead to Incinerator OptimizationBIOSOLIDS WASTE CONVERTED TO RENEWABLE ENERGY, FERTILIZER AND CLEAN Economic Modelling of Combined Heat and Power System Provides Multiple Benefits Evaluating the Effect of Operating Conditions on the Energy Potential from Anaerobic

C. E.

C.

C. Q.

C. P.

C.

C. P.

C. Q.

C.

C. O.

C. C.

C. Q.

C. I.

C. R.

C. I.

D. H.

D. N. United Kingdom

D. L.

D. P.

D. N.

D. D.

D. O.

Biogas Recovery and Energy Production Potential in New York StateANAEROBIC DIGESTION AND ENERGY RECOVERY FROM FOOD WASTEBurning through the FOG: City of Bellingham’s Approach to Grease Recovery and

Pre-selection of Renewable Power Generation System for City of Visalia, CA –

FOG - A Proven High Effciency Renewable Energy Souce, Not a NuisanceCodigestion of FOG & HSW with Biosolids in North America – Try Before You Buy – Bench-Scale Digestion Evaluation of Potential Co-Digestion Waste Focused-Pulsed Treatment of Waste Activated Sludge at the Racine Wastewater

Biogas Use in Chapel Hill, North CarolinaUSE OF ADM1 TO EVALUATE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTEBergen County Utilities Authority Digests Cheese Whey, Gets Gas:IF YOU BUILD IT WILL THEY COME; CO-DIGESTION OF HIGH STRENGTH WASTESAn Energy and Economic Comparison of Anaerobic Digestion vs. Ultra-High Temperature An Assessment of Cogeneration Alternatives: Planning for the Future

Characterizing the Risk to Groundwater Quality from Biosolids Beneficial Use ActivitiesBioassay of biosolids in an operational scale field trialDevelopment of a Class B Land Application Program at the North Davis Sewer District

Agricultural Advantages of ATAD BiosolidsNitrate Movement in Soil Profiles after Biosolids Land Application in a Dryland Effects of Long Term Application of Biosolids on Soil Carbon Sequestration in VirginiaWhen Your Cup Runneth Over --Lessons Learned in Recovering from a Biosolids Crisis at the

D. Q.

D. H.

D. P.

D. K.

E. J.

E. I.

E. P. Canada

F. Q.

F. B. China

G. Q.

G. I.

G. R.

G. I.

G. P.

G. P.

G. P.

G. J.

G. I.

ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY BY USING SITE BASED Fundamentals of Biosolids Land ApplicationBiosolids management changes undertaken at the Neuse River Wastewater Treatment Methodology for Selecting Fields to Resume Application of Biosolids at the City of

Creating Public Awareness and Political SupportCODIGESTION: HOW TO MAKE IT A FINANCIAL “WIN-WIN” FOR ALL PARTIESMovie stars and wooden monkeys -- dealing with the "ick" factor

A Comparative Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of Class A and Class B Biosolids Technologies Reduction of Greenhouse gas emission and Conservation of

Unconventional Residuals Thickening and High Performance DewateringInvestigation of co-thickening of primary and secondary sludges in dissolved air Belt Filter Press Dewatering Trials with Cambi Thermally Hydrolyzed Biosolids – Innovative disk thickener improves performance of digester at Chiquita WRF, CAComparison of Belt Filter Press and Rotary Press Dewatering PerformanceInnovations for Optimizing Centrifuge Solids Dewatering of Undigested and Inline Sludge Screens - municipal and industrial applicationsBiosolids Dewatering Alternatives for Orange County, FloridaProcess Assessment to Performance Testing: Transitioning from Plate and Frame to High

H. H.

H.

I. P.

I. P.

I. Q.

I. I. Canada

I. O.

I. P.

I. P.

I. P.

I. K.

I. Q.

I. P.

I. Q.

I.

I. O.

I. P.

J. R. Canada

J. D.

J. A.

GeoEnviron by GEOKON: One of the most comprehensive Environmental Data Management Systems in VARIANCE FROM GROUNDWATER MONITORING - $74M, AAA BOND RATING –

Evaluating Biosolids Management Alternatives in Northeast Tennessee: A Designing and Constructing a New Biosolids Composting Facility Utilizing the The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts – HRSD’s Approach to Biosolids

Managing a Biosolids Processing FacilityReinventing Your Residuals Management Approach during Disaster RecoveryEXPERIENCES WITH SOLIDS HANDLING OF BIOSOLIDS FROM TWO FACILITIESImpacts of Water Treatment Plant Residuals on Wastewater Treatment Debottlenecking Anaerobic Digester Capacity –

MACT 129 SSI RULE IMPLEMENTION- WHAT ACTIONS ARE NEEDED NOW TO CONTINUE WITH AN SSI?Coming Full Circle: A Biosolids Energy Balance and Benchmarking ModelMODELING OF THE MESOPHILIC DIGESTION PROCESS AT THE SAN JOSE/SANTA CLARA Municipal Biosolids Management Trends, Does the Triple Bottom Line Still Matter?THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL: REJUVENATION OF A DYING BIOSOLIDS INNOVATIVE DESIGN IMPLEMENTS A DECADE LONG BIOSOLIDS MASTER PLAN

ARE WE OVER-MIXING OUR DIGESTERS?

Valoris™ : the missing link for the effective treatment of sludge and digestate Does the Addition of High Strength Wastes Affect Biosolids Quality?WAS Pretreatment to Boost Volatile Solids Reduction and Digester Gas Production –

J. O.

J. C.

J. China

J. N.

J.

J. Q.

J. E.

Biosolids in Europe K. E. United Kingdom

K. L.

K. P.

K.

K. P.

K. C.

K. M.

L. A.

L.

L. P.

L. I.

L. C.

L. P.

Alternative Design Concepts for Egg-Shaped DigestersA Review of Biosolids Gasification: Environmental Benefits and Challenges of Comparison of Microwave and its Combined Methods on Removal of NP and Considerations in Using Thermal Hydrolysis for Pre-Digestion Processing in North AmericaTechnology Selection and Application for Enhancing Anaerobic Digestr Perfromance for Nutrient Recovery, an Emerging Component of a Sustainable Biosolids Management Program

Future Directions Biosolids Management and Assessment of

Biosoilds and Turf Fertilizer Phosphorus Regulation in Washington StateCan an Old MHI Meet the New EPA Sewage Sludge Incinerator Regulation?Update: Key Developments in Biosolids Management PolicyCan a New FBI Meet the New EPA Sewage Sludge Incinerator Regulations?

Significance of Legislative and Regulatory Considerations in

Controlling Pathogens and Stabilizing Sludge/Biosolids:

Analysis of Nutrient Removal using Membrane Thickening Aerobic DigestionMarketability and Selective Recovery Methods for Concentrate Brine and

BIOSOLIDS COMPOST…WHAT’S IT WORTH?

Class A Biosolids... Sorry We're All Sold OutBiosolids Pellets Marketability as a Supplemental Biomass FuelKey Factors in Building a Successful Biosolids Marketing and Distribution Program

L. P.

M. N.

M. N.

M. G.

M. D.

M. N.

M.

N. A. Canada

N. Q.

N. P. Canada

N.

N. C.

N. R.

N. C.

N. P.

N. B.

N. C.

N. C.

N. A.

N. C.

Biosolids Product Success Stories from the North Carolina Triangle RegionNEW NSF PRODUCT SAFETY PROTOCOL FOR PROCESSING SEWAGE SLUDGE INTO

WERF ROSI Project – Do We Need a Revised Time-Temperature Requirement to Achieve WERF ROSI Project: Effect of various Digestion and Dewatering Techniques Estimating Odor Emission Rates From Dewatered Lime Stabilized Biosolids and Demonstration of a Process to Further Reduce Pathogens in Biosolids: Wenatchee Keeping it Within the Fence: Dispersion Modeling, Piloting, and Innovation Help the City

WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE SOLUBILISATION WITH CHLORINE DIOXIDEPILOT TESTING NUTRIENT RECOVERY FROM WAS STREAMS FOR STRUVITE CONTROL Protocol development of Zea mays, Glycine max and Lumbricus terrestris to assess the The Importance of Total Solisa Measurement in the Wastewater Treatment ProcessPerformance of Acid-Gas Anaerobic Digesters for Minimization of Siloxane and Hydrogen Effect of Nanosilver and Antibiotic Loading on Fate of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Barriers to Biogas Utilization for Renewable Energy – A Decade of Cannibal Biosolids Reduction - What 10 years of Research and REDUCING BIOSOLID PHOSPHORUS BY EFFICIENT RELEASE AND HARVESTING OF Improving the digestibility of micro green algae by anaerobic co-digestion

Finding the Limits of FOG Co-DigestionSludge refreshment in the anaerobic side-stream recirculation process: the role of Comprehensive review of anaerobic pretreatment technologies for

N. G, Canada

O. D.

O. C.

O. P.

O. E.

P.

P.

P. I.

P. A.

P. R.

P. C.

P. I.

P.

P.

P. I.

P. P.

P. J.

P. C.

P. C.

Determination of Residual Polymer Concentration Using UV/Visible Spectroscopy

If Not Land Application, Then What? Master Planning for Three Utilities Reveals Trends Biosolids- and Yard-Waste-to-Energy Feasibility Study in St. Petersburg, FLBIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT in CAPE CORAL, FLORIDA: OPPORTUNITIES AND The Changing Landscape of Biosolids Management in North Carolina -

Emergency Response for Dewatering and Transportation of Biosolids.The Importance of Solids Measurement in the Wastewater Treatment ProcessMoving Beyond Zimpro Heat Treatment at the Dry Creek WWTPCRITERIA FOR PRESCRIPTIVE DESIGN BUILD PROCUREMENT Start up Considerations for 2TPAD Anaerobic Digestion - A Case Study?Successful application of the first EXELYS™ continuous thermal hydrolysis system in an CHALLENGES FACED AND SOLUTIONS FOUND DURING THE SALT LAKE CITY WATER Finding the Appropriate Level of Prescriptiveness for a Large Wastewater Design-Build ProjectA Distributed Residuals Master Plan for a Utility with Multiple Small Treatment FacilitiesHigh Solids Loading for a DAFT Retrofit for Co-Thickening OperationChanging Treatment Trains - Impact on Existing Residuals FacilitiesExtreme cost savings at extreme depth: Geothermal treatment of biosolidsLessons Learned in Design and Commissioning of Digester Gas CHPEnergy Conservation and Recovery in Wastewater Treatment

Q. E. United Kingdom

Q. J.

Q. F.

Q. P.

Q. P.

Q. P.

Q. I.

Q. C.

Q. J.

Q. P.

Q. C.

Q. J.

Q. F.

Q. K.

Q. K.

R. J.

R. G. Germany

R. C.

R.

R.

R. J.

The phosphate crisis - biosolids' strongest caseKeeping a Finger on the Pulse of Our Industry: A National Survey of our Biosolids and Digester

Bridgeport's Sustainable Biosolids Options

A Sustainable Biosolids Drying ProcessUnderstanding the Capability of Energy Efficient, Solar Sludge Drying for Large SUSTAINABLE (LOW ENERGY) DIGESTER LINEAR MOTION MIXING – “SHOW ME What Do You Feed a Hungry Digester? Assessing the Market for Co-Digestion in Central Maine

Enhanced digestion with EXELYS™-DLD – a direct pathway to a sustainable and cost

Dewatering Sidestream Treatment: Alternatives for Increased Nutrient Recovery and Development of a Biosolids Composting Facility for Meeting Strict Compliance BEST OF BOTH WORLDSEfficiently Managing C for Energy OptimizationA Theoretical and Practical Evaluation of Struvite Control and Recovery: Two Case

Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste DisposalEffluent Heat Recovery for Sustainable Biosolids Stabilization ProcessesEffluent Heat Recovery for Sustainable Biosolids Stabilization Processes

Three Years Experience with the Urbana Microwave Drying System

Efficiency of Solar Biosolids DryingStaged Combustion Lowers Emissions from Multiple Hearth Furnaces Implementation of a Medium Temperature Belt Dryer in North Carolina to Produce

Improved Solar Biosolids DryersRethinking an old technology – new digester design reduces CAPEX and OPEX

R. D.

R. P.

R. J.

R. G. Canada

R. C.

R. I.

Don't waste your waste! Recycling Sewage Sludge for Land Application! COMPARISON OF CLASS A SYSTEMSSMALL DIGESTER FACILITIESGOING WATERLESS FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE INCINERATORS – CAN IT BE DONE?Mercury Reduction at the Largest Municipal Incineration Facility in North America Energy, Fuels, and Chemical Recovery from Biomass and Biosolids – A State of the Art AN ISLAND WIDE APPROACH FOR BIOSOLIDS PROCESSING – A FOCUS ON ENERGY

If you cannot review an abstract please enter n/a in the total score column

Originality Status Quality

Yes 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Young Professional?

Technical Content



No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

Yes 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

No 0

Yes 0

Yes 0

No 0

Comments

Residuals and Biosolids 2012Abstracts Sorted by TopicReviewer Name:

Workshop Title

Dave Parry CDM

A. R. Rubin North Carolina Stat

Ned Beecher NEBRA

Natalie Sierra San Francisco Publi

Robert Reimers Tulane University

Author First Name

Author Last Name

Author Organization

The Business of Turning Biosolids into Energy and FertilizerWhy Develop a Nutrient Management Plan - Emergung Issues in nutrient Management Programs for Class A and Class B Advances in Biosolids Risk Communications and Public Involvement

Fundamentals of Biosolids Land ApplicationValue-Added Green Products Originating from Municipal and Manure Biosolids - The Direction of the 21st Century


Time Originality Status

Full Day

Half Day

Either

Half Day

Full Day

Technical Content


Quality Comments

0

0

0

0

0


Documents

Residuals and Biosolids 2012 Abstract Review Sheet