r ~es~L~.~~~~ i~ ~e~.1 - Kentucky Energy and

~~~~~~°:~~~~ ~~~~or~ t~ C~~~~~~°~~~~~ ~~ ~t~~~ ~~~~l~~t~~r~ of~~~:~~r ~es~L~.~~~~ i~ ~e~~~.~~1~, ~1~0~

~c~l~,~r~~ I~ 3~~~~~ ~~~~~~

f ~1 ..

~.~, ~ ~..

~'~

f '.

f +C +may ~ f .'

?3

A

f ~lj~ Y

,.2 ~1 tj

1. i_~r i( ~ _ , +x g

'.a,~

~~i

Z ~ ~

~ ~rily

~"~.aM i'S'~'4, i

I~e~tucl~y l~~v~r~ ~,i~~k~~ ~~s1P~~ilic ~roi~~~~aa~ ~C?biY~~~~i~isaon ~F~~~xer~p-r~l ~, 2f~~3~

The Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet does not discriminate on the basis ofrace, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability and provides, on request,reasonable accommodations including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford anindividual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programsand activities.

This report was printed with state funds on recycled paper.

2008 Integrated Report to Congresson Water Quality in Kentucky

Kentucky Department for Environmental ProtectionKentucky Division of WaterWater Qualify BranchFrankfort, Kentucky

This report has been approved for release:

Sandra ruzesky, cting irectorKentucky Division of Water

~~~,/o ~Date

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Volume I of this report covers years three and four of the second cycle of theintensive interagency watershed monitoring effort including work from state, federal andlocal agencies. The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and theirdistrict fisheries biologists have assisted with monitoring and reporting effort byproviding data for this report. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville andNashville districts, contributed to planning, monitoring and data submittal on thereservoirs they manage in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green — Tradewaterbasin management units. The Kentucky Division of Environmental Services providedanalyses of all water quality samples submitted by Division of Water. Appreciation tostaff in the following field offices: Bowling Green; London; Madisonville; and Paducahfor collecting many of the surface water quality samples and analyzing bacteria samples.U.S. EPA National Health and Environmental effects Research Laboratory in Corvallis,Oregon provided the random monitoring design. Thank you to those who have promotedthe watershed effort through Kentucky Division of Water. I would like to thank all thestaff in Water Quality and Groundwater and Watershed Management branches ofKentucky Division of Water for their dedication to the efforts of monitoring andassessing the waters of the commonwealth. I am grateful to colleagues who madevaluable comments on this report.

Randall G. PayneKentucky 305(b) Coordinator1 Apri12008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..............................................................................................I

LIST OF TABLES ..........................................................................................................III

LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ VI

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................3

2.I ATLAS OF KENTUCKY'S WATER RESOURCES AND PROFILE OF SELECT DEMOGRAPHIC

AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC STATISTICS ATLAS OF KENTUCKY ..................................................3

2.2 PROGRAMMATIC ..........................................................................................................52.2.1 Overview of Programs Related to Monitoring and Assessment .......................... 9

2.3 COST ASSOCIATED WITH WATER POLLUTION ............................................................132.4 MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT ISSUES FACING THE COMMONWEALTH ...................14

CHAPTER 3 SURFACE WATER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT ...............17

3.1 MONITORING PROGRAM -GENERAL .........................................................................17

3.1.1 Ambient (Long-Term) Monitoring Network .......................................................203.1.2 Rotating Watershed Network .............................................................................303.1.3 Swimming Advisory Monitoring .........................................................................303.1.4 Biomonitoring and Biosurvey Programs ..........................................................393.1. S Lake and Reservoir Monitoring .........................................................................SS

3.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................59

3.2.1 Aquatic Life Use .................................................................................................633.2.2 Primary Contact Recreation Use Support ........................................................683.2.3 Other Data Sources ...........................................................................................703.2.3 Fish Consumption Use Support ........................................................................703.2.4 Drinking Water Supply .......................................................................................723.2.5 Causes and Sources ...........................................................................................723.2.6 Determination of Assessment Segments .............................................................72

3.3 USE ASSESSMENT RESULTS, 2007-200H ....................................................................743.3.1 Statewide Assessment Results ............................................................................743.3.2 Use Assessment Results for 305(b)Reporting Cycle 2007 and 2008 .................913.3.3 Ohio River ........................................................................................................1133.3.4 Assessment Results of Lakes and Reservoirs: Focus on Upper Cumberland —4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater Rivers BMUs .................................................................114

LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................131

APPENDIX A. 305(B) STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT RESULTS FOR KENTUCKYTHROUGH 2008 305(B) CYCLE ...................................................................................A

APPENDIX B. REACH INDEXING MAPS OF ASSESSED STREAMS IN THEUPPER CUMBERLAND — 4-RIVERS BMU AND GREEN — TRADEWATERRIVERSBMU ...................................................................................................................B

APPENDIX C. USE ASSESSMENT MAPS OF LAKES AND RESERVOIRSMONITORED IN THE UPPER CUMBERLAND — 4-RIVERS BMU ANDGREEN — TRADEWATER RIVERS BMU ................................................................................0

ii

List of Tables

Pa eTable 2.2.1-1. Matrix of water resources and monitoring programs ....................................10Table 2.3-1. Cost to taxpayers for municipal waste water treatment facilities (planning,

designing, and construction) for the control of pollution from houses, businesses,and industries ..................................................................................................................13

Table 3.1-1. Total stream miles (NHD 1:24,000 scale) of respective river basins in the4-Rivers —Upper Cumberland and Green — Tradewater BMLJs ....................................17

Table 3.1-2. Number of Streams, stream segments, lakes and reservoirs assessed in theUpper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater BMUs of focus during the2005 and 2006 water-years .............................................................................................18

Table 3.1.1-1. Statewide primary water quality stations with Upper Cumberland —4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater BMIJs highlighted in bold type ................................22

Table 3.1.2-1. Rotating watershed water quality stations ....................................................31Table 3.1.2-2. Rotating watershed water quality stations in 4-Rivers (lower Cumberland,Msissippi, Ohio and Tennessee rivers) basins ................................................................34

Table 3.1.2-3. Rotating watershed water quality stations, Green — Tradewater BasinMnagement Unit .............................................................................................................36

Table 3.1.4-1. eference reach stream in Kentucky with those in bold to emphasizestreams in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater BMLJs .............40

Table 3.1.4-2. Candidate reference reach and exceptional streams and segments in theKentucky as defined in 401 KAR 5:030 .........................................................................45

Table 3.1.4-3. Key to stream names sampled and assessed in the Upper CumberlandRiver Basin using probabilistic methodology .................................................................50

Table 3.1.4-4. Key to stream names sampled and assessed in Lower Cumberland,Mississippi, Ohio and Tennessee Rivers Basins using probabilistic methodology........50

Table 3.1.4-5. Key to stream names sampled and assessed in Green — Tradewater BasinManagement Unit using probability methodology .........................................................53

Table 3.1.5-1. Lakes and reservoirs monitored in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers andGreen Tradewater Basin Management Units during the 2005 and 2006, respectively ........................................................................................................................................5 6

Table 3.2-1. Reporting categories assigned to surface waters during the assessmentProcess............................................................................................................................59

Table 3.2-2. List of those causes considered pollution by the KDOW (ADB numericalcodes listed ......................................................................................................................61

Table 3.2.1-1. Designated uses in Kentucky waters and the indicators used to assesslevel of support ...............................................................................................................65

Table 3.2.1-2. Biological criteria for assessment of warm water aquatic habitat(streams) use support ......................................................................................................67

Table 3.2.1-3. Criteria for lake and reservoir use support classification .............................69Table 3.3.1-1. Size of surface Waters assigned to reporting categories for Kentucky........76Table 3.3.1-2. Individual designated use support summary for streams and rivers inKentucky.........................................................................................................................77

Table 3.3.1-3. Ranking of causes (pollutants) to Kentucky rivers and streams ..................83Table 3.3.1-4. Probable sources of impairment to Kentucky rivers and streams ................84Table 3.3.1-5. Number of river miles assessed and level of support by use in each

major river basin ............................................................................................................. 88

iii

Table 3.3.2-1. Number of assessed river miles of the top five causes and sources in themajor river basins within the 4-Rivers BMU and Green-Tradewater Rivers BMiJ.......95

Table 3.3.2-2. Aquatic use attainment results based on the 2003 probability biosurveyof the Upper Cumberland River Basin ...........................................................................99

Table 3.3.2-3. Comparison of probability and targeted monitoring results for aquatic lifeuse in the Upper Cumberland River Basin ....................................................................101

Table 3.3.2-4. Aquatic life use attainment results based on the 2005 probabilitybiosurvey of the 4-Rivers Basins ...................................................................................103

Table 3.3.2-5. Comparison of probabilistic and targeted monitoring results for theaquatic life use in the 4-Rivers Basin ............................................................................104

Table 3.3.2-6. Aquatic use attainment results based on the 2004 probability biosurveyof the Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU ........................................................................110

Table 3.3.2-7. Comparison of probabilistic and targeted monitoring results for aquaticlife use in the Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU ...........................................................111

Table 3.3.2-8. Springs monitored in the Green River Basin during water-year2006-2007 ......................................................................................................................113

Table 3.3.2-9. Individual designated use support summary for springs in Kentucky,2008 ...............................................................................................................................113

Table 3.3.4.2-1. Individual use support summary for Kentucky reservoirs .......................115Table 3.3.4.2-2. Individual use support summary for Kentucky lakes ...............................116Table 3.3.4.2-3. Individual use support summary for Kentucky ponds .............................116Table 3.3.4.2-4. Number of acres of Kentucky reservoirs, lakes, and ponds affected by

individual cases (pollutants) ..........................................................................................118Table 3.3.4.2-5. Number of acres of Kentucky lakes (natural) affected by causes

(pollutants) .....................................................................................................................118Table 3.3.4.2-6. Number of acres of Kentucky ponds affected by cause (pollutants)........118Table 3.3.4.2-7. Sources of causes (pollutant) to Kentucky reservoirs ..............................119Table 3.3.4.2-8. Sources of causes (pollutant) to Kentucky lakes (natural) .......................119Table 3.3.4.2-9. Source of cause (pollutant) to Kentucky ponds .......................................120Table 3.3.4.2-10. Trophic state of reservoirs in Kentucky .................................................120Table 3.3.4.2-11. Trophic state of lakes in Kentucky .........................................................120Table 3.3.4.2-12. Upper Cumberland River Basin reservoirs that fully support assessed

uses ................................................................................................................................121Table 3.3.4.2-13. Upper Cumberland River Basin reservoirs partially supporting

assessed uses ..................................................................................................................122Table 3.3.4.2-14. Upper Cumberland River Basin reservoirs not supporting assessed

uses ................................................................................................................................122Table 3.3.4.2-15.4-Rivers Basin (lower Cumberland, lower Ohio, Mississippi andTennessee rivers) lakes and reservoirs that fully support assessed uses .......................124

Table 3.3.4.2-16.4-Rivers Basin (lower Cumberland, lower Ohio, Mississippi andTennessee rivers) Kentucky River Basin lakes and reservoirs that partially supportassessed uses ..................................................................................................................125

Table 3.3.4.2-17.4-Rivers Basins (lower Cumberland, lower Ohio, Mississippi andTennessee rivers) reservoir not supporting assessed uses .............................................126

iv

Table 3.3.4.2-18. Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU reservoirs that fully support allassessed uses ..................................................................................................................128

Table 3.3.4.2-19. Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU reservoirs that partially supportassessed uses ..................................................................................................................131

v

List of Figures

PageFigure 2.1-1. Level IV Ecoregions of Kentucky ..................................................................4Figure 2.2-1. Kentucky Basin Management Unit and monitoring years of the secondfive-year cycle .................................................................................................................7

Figure 2.2-2. Phases of the second cycle of the basin management unit approach(2003-2007) ........................................................~.............................................................8

Figure 3.1-1. Monitored springs in the Green River Basin, 2006-2007 ..............................19Figure 3.1.1-1. Fixed (long term) ambient surface water quality network ..........................26Figure 3.1.1-2. Targeted biological (including probabilistic sites) and ambient water

quality monitoring in upper Cumberland River Basin ...................................................27Figure 3.1.1-3. Targeted biological (including probabilistic sites) and ambient water

quality monitoring in 4-Rivers Basin .............................................................................28Figure 3.1.1-4. Targeted biological (including probabilistic sites) and ambient water

quality monitoring stations in Green — Tradewater BMU ..............................................29Figure 3.1.2-1. Upper Cumberland River Basin rotating watershed water quality

stations monitored 2005-2006 ........................................................................................33Figure 3.1.2-2.4-Rivers rotating water quality stations monitored 2005-2006 ..................35Figure 3.1.2-3. Green-Tradewater BMIJ rotating watershed water quality stationsmonitored 2006-2007 ......................................................................................................38

Figure 3.1.4-1. Probabilistic biological survey sites in the Upper Cumberland RiverBasin (key to stream names on previous page) ..............................................................51

Figure 3.1.4-2. Probabilistic biological survey sites in the Lower Cumberland,Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee Rivers Basin (key to stream names on previouspage) ...............................................................................................................................52

Figure 3.1.4-3. Probabilistic biological survey sites in the Green — Tradewater BasinManagement Unit (key to stream names on previous page) ...........................................54

Figure 3..3.1-1. Aquatic life and primary (swimming) contact recreation use support bymajor river basins in Kentucky .......................................................................................90

Figure 3.3.1-2. Percent change regarding full support level (based on stream miles) inmajor Kentucky River Basins between 2006 and 2008 305(b) cycle .............................91

Figure 3.3.2-1. Proportions of aquatic life use support in the Upper Cumberland RiverBasin based on probability biosurveys ..........................................................................100

Figure 3.3.2-2. Proportions of aquatic life use support in the 4-Rivers basins, 2005,based on probability biosurveys ....................................................................................104

Figure 3.3.2-3. Proportions of aquatic life use in Green — Tradewater Rivers BMiJbased on probability biosurveys ....................................................................................111

vi

Chapter 1. Introduction

The 2008 Integrated Report (IR) was prepared by the Kentucky Division of Water

(KDOV~, Department for Environmental Protection (DEP), for submittal to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to fulfill requirements of sections 303(d),

305(b) and 314 of the Federal Water Pollution Control (or Clean Water) Act of 1972

(P.L. 92-500), as subsequently amended. Section 305(b) of the Act requires states to

assess and report current water quality conditions to EPA every two years.

In 2006, an Integrated Report (IR) was released for the first time by the

commonwealth. It was produced in two volumes, and this procedure is followed for the

2008 IR. Volume 1 reports the 305(b) assessment methods, processes, overview of the

commonwealth's water resources, monitoring programs, statistical findings, geo-

referencing of monitored and assessed results and a comprehensive table listing all waters

or segments assessed, with assessment results, causes (pollutants or pollution) and

probable sources. Volume 2 of the IR lists those waters and segments that were not fully

supporting one or more designated uses (DU), based on monitored data, and require a

TMDL (total maximum daily load) calculation for those pollutants causing the

impairments. By integrating the two reports, users of the information in the first IR

(2006) found this comprehensive reporting medium of greater utility by having all

relevant information together in two volumes. The use of assessment categories to file

assessed stream segments and lakes or reservoirs provides an accurate and convenient

method for the commonwealth to track the miles (or acres) of assessed and non-assessed

uses, while also tracking those impaired waters from the time of 303(d)-listing through

the TMDL process and post-implementation.

KDOW utilized the assessment database (ADB) to store use assessments and aid

in producing the various tables and compilation of statistics that were presented in this

report. The current report was based on assessment data stored in ADB version 2.2; this

database had been modified to function per the particular needs of KDOW. As with

previous 305(b) reports, ADB provides assessment data of stream segments and

geographic data (GNIS [geographic names information system] and latitude -longitude)

used to georeference those assessments. This proved to be an efficient mechanism to

produce the reach-indexed maps. In addition to the ADB, the TMDL section developed a

database based on ADB architecture to track 303(d)-listed water bodies and segments.

This database was updated to reflect the TMDL development, approval, and delistings of

those waters or segments.

The KDOW initiated afive-year rotating watershed management approach in

1997. Results from the first basin management unit (BMU), the Kentucky River, were

reported in the 2000 305(b) report. This IR represents monitoring efforts from the second

cycle of the BMU monitoring strategy; thus the 4-Rivers -Upper Cumberland River and

Green - Tradewater rivers BMLJs were of primary focus in this 2008 IR; these BMUs

were monitored beginning in Apri12005 —March 2006 and Apri12006 —March 2007,

respectively. This report also incorporated assessment data and results from monitoring

that occurred during this reporting cycle outside of the BMUs of focus; thus providing a

statewide update of monitoring results. Data collected by the Ohio River Va11ey Water

Sanitation Commission (ORSANCO) were used to make assessments for the mainstem of

the Ohio River (ORSANCO, 2008).

The 303(d)-list contains 6083 miles and approximately 2097 pollutant-waterbody

combinations. This monitoring cycle was yeazs three and four of phase two of the second

five-year BMU cycle. As such, much of the monitoring activities focused on TMDL-

associated watersheds to identify the extent, concentrations and track sources of

pollutants of concern necessary for TMDL calculation. To maintain overall awareness of

aquatic life support conditions, and compare results from the first cycle phase (2000 and

2001) of these two BMUs, KDOW conducted a second probabilistic designed study of

wadeable streams (1St — 5~' Strahler order).

There are reasons that some impaired waters were not 303(d)-listed. For example,

evaluated data from discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) from permitted facilities were

not on the 303(d) list because permit compliance should result in protection of the

designated uses; also, these DMR data were not directly monitored instream, but at the

outfall.

Chapter 2. Background

2.1 Atlas of Kentucky's Water Resources and Profile of Select Demographic andPhysiographic Statistics Atlas of Kentucky

State population (2006 estimate)1 ..................................................................4,206,074

Surface azea (square miles) ............................................................................40,409Number of counties ........................................................................................120

Number of major physiographic regions .......................................................5Number of level III ecoregions ......................................................................7Number of level IV ecoregions ......................................................................25

Number of major basins .................................................................................12Number of USGS 8-digit HUCs2 ...................................................................42Number of stream miles (1:24,000 NHD3) ....................................................90,961

Number of stream-formed border miles (primarily Ohio River) .......861Number of publicly owned lake and reservoir surface acres (estimated)......229,500Three largest reservoirs by surface acres

Kentucky Lake (Kentucky portion) ...................................................57,103Cumberland Lake ...............................................................................47,623Barkley Lake (Kentucky portion) ......................................................42,780

Wetland acres (approximation)4 ....................................................................324,000

US Census Bureau2Hydrolgic unit code3National hydrography dataset4The state of Kentucky's environment: 1994 status report. The Kentucky EnvironmentalCommission, 1995.

The physiography of Kentucky provides a landscape of 25-Level IV Ecoregions

(Figure 2.1-1) that are diverse geologically and physically and provide a variety of

microclimates that axe important in forming and supporting diverse plant and aquatic

communities. 'This rich aquatic biodiversity is a part of the southeastern aquatic

environment that provided long, stable conditions, a result ofnon-glaciations. While the

state has many miles of streams and rivers, natural lakes are uncommon and aze found

along the Lower Ohio and Mississippi rivers in the Jackson Purchase (region west of

Tennessee River [Reservoir]); most of these lakes were formed by oxbows or shallow

depression basins. Many of the major rivers in the commonwealth have been dammed

Kj

Figure 2.1

-1. Level IV

Ecoregions of Kentucky.

Scio

to Dissected

N

Hol

ocen

e Meandor Belts

r 0 N N -o ~~~s

'Bluff Hills

Mono

ngah

ela Transition Zone

~°~

:y

~J

Z ~

y ~

a~

mWab

ash -Ohio Bottomlands

~

,r

r' m

o cass

ayg

cQ

o~~ ~

~ ~

\J0~

yea

o~,~

~c

j y \

~

SZ

C

~

Q~rp ~J

G~I-

~~a

~

~. ~

~~

~5'~ gym°

av'0 3

c ~

Q\a~e

3'Qs,

~,~

and

O

a~.

o4f~

m

\\s

\aGr~

~~ yya

~\\e

~ Ea

ster

n Highland Rim

m ~

QQQa

~~~ ~

~ a

m

~~~O~d-

Mam

GaJg JP

,an l ~

~II c

~yy

~C'~

`~~5~

mot

h ~~

~~ ~

a~a

M~~

Western Pen

nyro

yal Karst Plai

Qua

~be~

\ Western Hig

hlan

d Rim

Outer Na

shvi

lle Basin

50

0

50

100 Miles

for flood control and secondarily for generation of electricity. This change has altered

the natural aquatic communities of these systems while providing drinking water

supplies, tourism and recreational opportunities. While only a portion of wetlands exist

from what was estimated to have occurred historically (1.5+million acres), loss of

wetland acreage has slowed with federal and state regulations and disincentives for

altering wetlands in place (The Kentucky Environmental Commission, 1995). By river

basin, the Green River has the largest proportion of remaining wetland acres,

approximately 88,000. As indicated by the number of caves in Kentucky, there are

significant karst areas in the state, but the largest karst landscape exists in the Green

River basin, which includes Mammoth Cave. These areas of karst present special

concerns for water quality protection because groundwater flows may be unknown and

difficult to monitor due to limited access.

2.2 Programmatic

In order to better characterize the waters of the state and better coordinate

resources toward addressing problems, Kentucky adopted a Watershed Management

Framework in 1997. The purpose of this management framework is to use programs,

people, information, and funds as efficiently as possible to protect, maintain, and restore

water and land resources. This approach provides a framework within which

participating individuals and institutions can link and support one another's efforts in

watershed management.

Coordinated, multi-agency watershed monitoring was initiated in 1998 in the

Kentucky River basin, and monitoring for the first five-year watershed cycle was

completed in 2002. The first cycle of monitoring focused on obtaining, for the first time,

a snapshot of conditions of Kentucky's waters, especially wadeable streams. Most local,

state, and federal agencies in Kentucky with monitoring responsibilities cooperated in the

watershed monitoring effort. Some agencies simply provided their data and carried out

monitoring as usual; others revised their sampling programs and sampling methods for

better fit with the watershed monitoring plan. In early 2005, Kentucky Department for

Environmental Protection and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

5

formally agreed to begin cooperating and sharing combined resources to work toward

making tangible improvement to shared watersheds. For example, several watersheds

(Clarks River, Red River and upper Cumberland River) were identified to have interstate

concerns and probable shared sources of pollutants or pollution affecting stream health.

Monitoring was implemented in 2005 to identify sources and spatial and temporal

concentrations of nitrates in the Red River watershed in the lower Cumberland River

basin. In addition to scoping and fixing pollutant-source issues, an effort was agreed

upon whereby each state identified shared high quality watersheds then, where feasible,

establishing them as such in their respective regulations. Additionally, where one state

had identified high quality waters crossing state boundary, but the other had not, that state

assessed their portion of the stream to determine if it qualified for elevation to high

quality designation. An example where an Outstanding National Resource Water

(ONRW) had been designated is Reelfoot Lake. Tennessee and Kentucky share this

resource (approximately 20 percent in Kentucky), but it has been designated as an

ONRW only by Tennessee. Kentucky included this designation (ONRW) for its portion

of the resource putting in the 2007-8 triennial review submission.

According to the adopted framework, the state is divided into five BMUs (Figure

2.2-1) for the purposes of focusing management activities spatially and temporally.

Activities within each of the five units follow afive-year cycle so efforts can better be

focused within a basin. Phases in the cycle include: 1) collecting information about water

resources in the basin; 2) identifying priority watersheds; 3) listing the watersheds in the

basin in order of priority and deciding which problems can be solved with existing funds;

4) determining how best to solve the problems in the watershed; 5) developing an action

plan; and 6) carrying out the strategies in the plan (Figure 2-3). Public participation is

also encouraged throughout the process, allowing citizens and organizations to stay

informed and have an active role in management of resources. Monitoring and

assessment take place in the second and third years, respectively, of the watershed cycle.

:~

Figure 2.2-1. Kentucky Basin Management Units and monitoring years of the second five-year cycle.

J~

N S. ~ .~ ,A\~

_, I

~ ;,

Licking: River

~~ ~

r ~

;. ~

~,

--1

~'~

~ 20'04.

~"

~~~,

~?(

~

~~,

= r~~-~~;.

~~`:~~_~,,~;:;~

Salt River

".f

~ ~ ;

'}r

..{;rF

f F ~ fj.~,:

,s:

~~ '

~. (~"(~/~

Kentucky River

\ F{~ f

~?~`~ f

~F ~ f ~j f

~.`f!

/'~'~

J" ~f

~ f ~ ff r ~~/ fj

~ f

f ~`

~~lV~f'

'1

^~-

li~ ~;~ ~! '

~~.'`~` f+/' •` r

:~~Ff

fF iF` f/

r +' f~ ~/ ~

` ,~ !` Jl

S

~S ~

s'~

r;,~, rf~f '

f ~

~ %

~+i'~. %~,`r

r ~F-

'r ~ f

•~ r ~ ,

,:~;

~

S`~~"'''

2003

l ~~

f~,.

,r

1

,,,,f•`~

/`%~. ;f ~~.

fe~G.~

~.1T'rf~

'{~p~?

~A ,~~y~

~~ y±~r

~~R..v~

}.~ f'

~'`~'r .~

{ f,

.~~,ffy

~ r; ~=

~jy.~

~

~ ~

/ f'

f/f"'^r . :?v~,/

. `'`Ytirry1~'G!~ V

rf .

_ ~~

F'~, fi .: !,//j

~` f,f

ffrfi ''~.J~ ~~.1 ~±F' !• ~-

~"-^,

i~

,fir',.' /

rli

~ `

/

~ f ~~ : f

,r ~i

:~

`^ /'

r~,f f` f 1~,1 f ~j' f ~

f.'f

f f+r ~f'`

/` .i fj'~uf N.~. ~'

~. ~

~3}

_ /' .

Sr~'

//~

'~'`~ `

.~'

~F.,

,.,~./.~r.-'

2005

♦ .

`

f

s.~

lFjf

f r

~jJ5

Cumberland/Mississippi/Ohio/Tennessee

40

0

40

80 Miles

Figure 2.2-2. Phases of the second cycle of the basin management unit approach (2003 —

I D o f P rio rityP HASE 1 Areas

P HASE 2 I DataR equirements

P HASE 3 Specific M onitoringA pproach

.,

P HASE 4 Probabilistic &T argeted M onitoring

S tra to g ie s

P HASE 5 implementation

Each basin was phased into the second cycle of the Watershed Framework schedule

as listed below. Monitoring activities began in April and ended in March the

following year.

• Apri12003 — Mazch 2004 —Kentucky River basin

• Apri12004 —March 2005 —Salt and Licking river basins

• April 2005 —March 2006 —upper Cumberland River and 4-Rivers (lower

Cumberland, Ohio, Mississippi and Tennessee rivers) basins

• April 2006 —March 2007 —Green and Tradewater rivers basins

• April 2007 —March 2008 —Big Sandy River, Little Sandy River ,and Tygarts

Creek basins

Benefits of this approach include:

• Planning and determination of monitoring strategy developed on a watershed

approach for TMDL-specific monitoring

• Increased coordination of resource management activities focused on

identified priorities in each basin

• Greater ability to stretch limited dollars for implementation activities through

partnering and coordination of efforts; spin-off benefit of the initial BMiJ

cycle approach

8

~ Collaboration of state and federal agencies effectively increasing manpower,

expertise and environmental disciplines

• More data as monitoring efforts are coordinated — approximately a four-fold

increase in assessment data has been realized since the inception of the

watershed approach in 1998.

• Better data as agencies standardize methods and procedures.

• Greater opportunities for citizen involvement.

The 2004 305(b) Report represented the completion of the first monitoring and

assessment cycle of the five BMLJ management framework. Whereas the purpose of

monitoring in the first watershed cycle was to obtain baseline data statewide, monitoring

in the second cycle (begun in 2003) focused on impaired watersheds. However, ambient

monitoring continued at long-term stream and lake stations, watersheds not sampled in

the first watershed cycle, probabilistic biosurveys, and on small streams to refine

reference reach metrics. Much of the work was done sequentially to make best use of

monitoring personnel and to collect data during the target index period according to

stream sizes. The following is the cycle beginning with planning phase-year with the

monitoring and assessment in years two and three, respectively.

• 2002 - 2004 —Kentucky River Basin

• 2003 - 2005 —Salt —Licking basin

• 2004 - 2006 —Upper Cumberland River and 4-Rivers (Lower Cumberland,

Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee rivers) basin

• 2005 - 2007 —Green — Tradewater rivers basin

• 2006 - 2008 —Big Sandy —Little Sandy rivers and Tygarts Creek basin

2.2.1 Overview of Programs Related to Monitoring and Assessment

The Division of Water has the primary responsibility of monitoring and assessing

the commonwealth's water resources, and overseeing the permitting of facilities and

industries that discharge point sources to waters through Kentucky Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System (KPDES).

D

To monitor the designated uses of Kentucky's waters and monitor the

effectiveness of various control programs, such as KPDES, KDOW has a number of

monitoring programs that monitor biological and water quality indicators for 305(b) and

303(d) purposes. Table 2.2.1-1 highlights the monitoring programs and the indicators

associated with each. Amore comprehensive discussion of surface water quality

monitoring programs follows in Chapter 3.

Table 2.2.1-1. Matrix of water resources and monitorin ro ams°Long- °Rotating ~`Tazgeted Reference Probabilistic `Lake 'Ground-term Surface Biological Reach Biosurvey Monitoring water &Surface Water Monitoring SpringsWater Monitor-

inStreams (1 S`-5 X X X XorderLar e Rivers X X XLakes/Reservoirs XGroundwater XSwam s/Wetlands -- -- -- -- -- -- --eIndicators: physicochemical and pathogen indicatorbIndicators: macroinvertebrates, fish, algae, physicochemical, habitatIncludes some 6`~' order streams where wadeable and associated with ambient water qualitystationsdIndicators: macroinvertebrates, physicochemical, habitateIndicators: physicochemical, fish kills, macrophytes, algae

For those waters requiring a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) pollutant

reduction, the division's TMDL program manages this process by coordinating the

monitoring and development of those discharge or load reductions necessary to bring the

impaired Designated Use (DU) into full support. The primary source of pollutants

affecting the commonwealth's waters emanate from nonpoint sources (NPS). The fact

that sedimentation became the leading pollutant in the 2004 305(b) cycle was a direct

reflection on NPS pollution being the more significant source of degradation to the state's

waters. This trend follows nationwide.

T'he primary objectives of the ambient monitoring program were to establish

current conditions and long-term records and trends of water quality, biological, fish

tissue, and sediment conditions in the state's major watersheds (Kentucky Division of

Water, 1986). Sub-objectives were identified as determining: 1) the quality of water in

Outstanding Resource Waters; 2) background or baseline water quality conditions in

10

streams not impacted by dischazges; 3) the extent to which point and nonpoint sources

affect trophic status of lakes and reservoirs; and 4) the impact of acid precipitation on

water quality of lakes and reservoirs. There were 70 primary water quality stations

throughout the commonwealth that are monitored on a monthly frequency at each station

respective of the current monitoring cycle. These stations were located at mid-and lower

watershed reaches of 8-digit HUC basins. Location of stations also occurred near the

inflow and outflow of major reservoirs, for example Green River Reservoir in the Green

River basin. Those stations outside the BMU monitoring phase were monitored

bimonthly. Implemented with the rotating basin approach, were the rotating watershed

stations. These stations were monitored for the same suite of water quality parameters as

the primary stations, but were monitored in smaller watersheds for a variety of reasons.

Those primary considerations for candidate watershed monitoring were: 1) TMDL

development; 2) characterize water quality in reference watersheds; 3) monitor waters

that receive permitted discharge (for instance a municipal wastewater treatment plant) to

characterize upstream and downstream wa"ter quality; and 4) characterize water quality

conditions in certain landscapes, such as agricultural or mining areas.

KDOW's targeted biological monitoring program has a long history associated in

determining the health and long-term water quality of stream and river resources. In

addition to biological community survey, water quality variables were included in the

monitoring program. Biological monitoring was implemented in the 1970s with

significant refinement of the program as more research led to the development of

biological multimetric indices (for more information go to 1vlethods for Assessing Biolo~itcai

Integrity Of Surface Waters in Kentucky). A portion of KDOW's biological monitoring

emphasis was shifted to development of those metrics and associated criteria through a

reference reach approach. This was implemented in the 1990s based on an ecoregional

approach to determine reference conditions in each basin. These waters do not represent

pristine conditions rather they represent the best examples of high water quality and

biological integrity in each of the four identified bioregions. Through this effort a

network of streams, or stream reaches, have been identified throughout the

commonwealth. These stream reaches were listed in water quality standards, 401 KAR

5:030 and can be accessed at: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/kar/401/005/030.htm. One to three

11

biological communities (macroinvertebrates, fishes, or algae) were sampled per

biosurvey. When one community only was used to make an aquatic life use support

determination, either macroinvertebrates or fishes were monitored, typically the former.

A random biosurvey effort was initiated with the help of EPA's technical support

group in Corvallis, Oregon. Kentucky's approach was to sample macroinvertebrates

once at a minimum of 50 sites in each BMU. In 2004 nutrients and additional chemical

water quality variables were added to the suite of indicators used by this program. These

additional data were added to aid in the development of numeric nutrient criteria, gain a

more comprehensive knowledge of what ambient water quality variable values were in

each BMLJ, and increase the confidence of each aquatic life use assessment. This

program allows KDOW to report on aquatic life use support in wadeable streams for the

entire state over the five year watershed cycle. Section 305(b) use support determinations

made through the probabilistic biosurvy program were determined only on segments

directly monitored, whereas extrapolated use support over a given BMU was made for

informational, resource conditions, and planning purposes only. This program was

important both on the statewide level as well as national level, as indicated by EPA's

nationwide probabilistic monitoring efforts in wadeable streams, lakes and reservoirs and

a planned large rivers survey in mid-2008.

Lake and reservoir monitoring program began in the early 1980s as part of the

Clean Lakes monitoring initiative. Currently KDOW monitors all significant publicly-

owned lakes and reservoirs in the state (approximately 105 waterbodies). Many of the

Corps of Engineers (COE) reservoirs and Kentucky Lake, a Tennessee Valley Authority

(TVA) project, were typically monitored by those respective agencies per our protocol

and collaborative efforts. The working relationship between KDOW and COE,

Louisville and Nashville Districts, has proved to be a good cooperative effort that is

beneficial to all parties by increasing available resources (e.g. COE may provide the field

work and KDOW, in coordination with Division of Environmental Services (DES)

provides chemical analyses).

Physicochemical and chlorophyll a were analyzed to determine current Trophic

State status of these waterbodies. Monitoring occurs three times during the growing

season (spring, summer and fall) to capture the seasonal variability that occurs and

12

reflects the trophic state of the resource. By monitoring these resources every five years,

trends in water quality can be measured. This monitoring program collects data. sufFicient

to determine aquatic life, secondary contact recreation and drinking water supply DUs.

T'he majority of these resources are posted by Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Department as

"no swimming" water bodies, precluding applicability of primary contact recreation

monitoring.

2.3 Costs Associated with Water Pollution

Putting a dollar figure on the costs associated with water pollution is difficult to

determine. However, the costs associated with KPDES-permitted facilities, which are

primarily comprised of industrial facilities, package wastewater treatment plants, and

municipal wastewater treatment plants, are in the tens of millions of dollars considering

construction, operating, maintenance, compliance, and administrative costs. Figures

obtained from KDOW, Facilities Construction Branch, give some insight into the costs

associated with treating household, business and industrial wastes.

Table 2.3-1. Costs to taxpayers for municipal waste water treatment facilities (planning,

design and construction) for the control of pollution from houses, businessesand industries.

Clean Water State Revolving Fund EPA Special AppropriationGrants

FFY 2005 38,722,975 7,216,800FFY 2006 20,282,027 5,925,400Prior to FFY2005

400,653,831 (first loan made inMa 1989

38,154,802 (first grant awarded in1998)

Total $459,658,833 $51,297,002

However, these costs are only a portion of the total costs to society. The

increased cost of technology needed to treat potable water in areas of heavy

siltation/sedimentation alone may result in loss of source water supply because the cost of

treatment is prohibitive, while areas of organic industrial contamination may require

expensive continuous carbon-based treatment. Medical and loss of productivity costs

associated with various diseases that may result from waterborne pollution are not

accurately known. For example, consumption offish flesh that has elevated levels of

13

mercury carries increased health risks that may be at a level to restrict consumption by

children and women of childbearing age, while fish contaminated with elevated levels of

PCBs carries increased cancer risks to the general population. Pollutants affect

commercial fisheries where restricted consumption, or loss of resources, reduces the

commercially available fish population; additionally, some members of society rely on

subsistence fishing to supply a portion of their nutritional needs. Water pollution may

also result in loss of revenue to governments and local businesses if recreation areas are

unsafe for swimming or fishing. The shipping indushy relies on barges to move many

commodities around the nation, and the cost of maintaining shipping channels prone to

fill due to excess sedimentation is an ongoing expense to both industries and

governments.

2.4 Monitoring and Assessment Issues Facing the Commonwealth

Some of the larger monitoring and assessment issues are presented below.

However, the overriding issue is personnel to conduct additional monitoring tasks and

use these generated data in a meaningful way throughout the various water management

programs.

KDOW submitted a nutrient criteria development plan in 2004 that was

satisfactory to EPA. The first waters scheduled for criteria development are wadeable

streams and intrastate reservoirs. A particular need is for data from the inner bluegrass

(ecoregion 711). Watersheds reflecting reference conditions are difficult to locate in this

region due to the intensive land uses largely by agriculture as well as development or

urbanization. This particular area has high phosphate content found in the Lexington

limestone layers of the plateau that, with the addition of significant inputs of nitrogen

associated with intensive livestock grazing, grasslands, and urbanization and

suburbanization, has resulted in nutrient-rich streams and reservoirs. The division has

begun addressing this issue through applying a 1 mg/L total phosphorus discharge limit

to those waters impaired by nutrient enrichment, and increased nutrient sampling;

however, greater frequency is needed to capture seasonal variations and effects on stream

systems. Given the karst geology of much of the inner bluegrass, many of these streams

are connected and have watersheds that are yet to be mapped and understood. To obtain

14

necessary additional nutrient-data KDOW has secured EPA funds to involve Western

Kentucky University and USGS to monitor two Level IV ecorgions in this area (71a and

71 e). Continuance of data collection and development of criteria based on the best

attainable conditions will dictate those numbers in this region. Additional data are

required from the mountainous region of the commonwealth for numeric nutrient criteria

development. A 106 supplemental grant was awarded to Kentucky Geological Survey

(KGS) to assist KDOW in physicochemical data collection in wadeable watersheds in

this region that receive discharge from municipal, package and household wastewater

treatment facilities or units. Part of the study design was to identify those receiving

watersheds that have minimal other potential impacts, particularly from mining activities.

This project was scheduled to begin in spring 2008 and run approximately one year.

Biologic communities (macroinvertebrates and algae) will be collected from each station

once during the appropriate biological index period. Correlation of nutrient data to

community structure was the objective. It should be noted the KDOW had considerable

data throughout this region; however, either nutrient data were not collected with

biological data or it was collected from naturally nutrient-poor reference watersheds.

This region is made up of the following river basins: upper Cumberland; upper Kentucky;

Big Sandy; Little Sandy; and upper Licking.

Lake and reservoir data were relatively complete and span approximately 25

years. This program continued to characterize the trophic state of these waters during the

growing season; samples were collected spring, summer, and fall. The majority of

reservoirs had remained stable according to TSI, but there were trends from oligotrophic

to mesotrophic occurring in some waters.

Kentucky's wetlands were primarily bottomland hazdwood systems that flood

seasonally. This corresponds to the winter and spring rainy season. Any excess nutrients

will likely have a subtle impact on these environments since the supply of water comes

from flooding rivers, and seasonal inundation. These bottomland hardwoods naturally do

not hold standing surface water for a prolonged period of the year.

To date, there have been no recognizable geographic patterns in mercury levels in

fish tissue. A potential strategy to aid in detecting a possible pattern may be moving

toward a random monitoring scheme. Constraints may be put on the habitat population

~F~

of interest, such as 4~' and 5th order wadeable streams, major streams (>5~' order), etc.

States are now faced with the situation where they are asked to maintain a robust

ambient monitoring program to characterize and track conditions of the state's waters

(305b reporting) and at the same time collect data for TMDL development in hundreds of

impaired waterbodies and segments, eventually tracking the success of implementation.

Faced with these tasks, the most critical resource need at this time is additional support

for the TMDL program, as much of the monitoring resources have been shifted from

ambient programs into the TMDL monitoring-specific needs. Like most states,

Kentucky's schedule requires hundreds (approximately 1700) of TMDLs be developed

over the next decade. More staff, lab resources, and especially contractual monies, must

be obtained to accomplish this workload without continued loss of ambient monitoring

resources, either through additional EPA or state funding. KDOW must establish

arrangements to fund TMDL planning, data collection, lab analysis, and development

with internal, contractual, and interested third-party resources, including volunteer

organizations.

Industrial and point source monitoring is important to the commonwealth's

assessment of the effectiveness of permitted facilities adhering to their permit limits, and

if the permitted limits are appropriate and protective for the receiving waters. The

primary tazget of this monitoring program would be to gage the biological integrity in

these waters. This monitoring need may only be fulfilled with significant monetary and

personnel resources; however, neither of these resources will likely become sufficient

within this decade. Contracting the work through a federal grant would be one way to

address this need.

This permit biomonitoring program would help fulfill sections 301, 302, 303, 305,

306, 307, 308, 314 and 402 of the CWA. Milestones would be incremental, with

resources initially directed to pre-permit biomonitoring. As resources increase

biomonitoring would be implemented prior to application renewals. The earliest

implementation would be 2014 and, given the resources needed to undertake this

objective, it is currently not viewed as realistic in this timeframe.

16

Chapter 3. Surface Water Monitoring and Assessment

3.1 Monitoring Program -General

Kentucky Division of Water has used NHD 1:24,000 scale maps for monitoring,

planning, and assessment since 2004. As noted in Chapter 2, there are over 90,000 miles

of streams in the commonwealth at this resolution. Of particular interest in this 2008 IR

are new 305(b) assessments of two BMLTs, the 4-Rivers -upper Cumberland and Green —

Tradewater, which were the focus of monitoring in water-years 2005 and 2006,

respectively. Table 3.1-1 provides population of stream miles for those two BMUs by

river basin.

Table 3.1-1. Total stream miles (NHD 1:24,000 scale) of respective river basins in the 4-T• /1 1 1 1 1 /1 1 T 1 LT T~vci~ — uuu~l VU111UG11[111LL tLL1LL V1GG11 - 11CLLLGW2LLG1 ~ivi~~.

4-Rivers -Upper Cumberland BMU, including Ohio Riverminor tributaries ..............................................................................................21,166

upper Cumberland River sub-basin ...........................................10,4334-Rivers sub-basin .....................................................................10,733(lower Cumberland, Mississippi, adjacent Ohio and Tennessee rivers)

Green — Tradewater BMU ..............................................................................23,795Green River basin including Ohio River minor tributaries .......18,858Tradewater and associated Ohio River minor tributaries ............4,937

In this reporting cycle, primary monitoring occurred in 23 of the state's 42 eight-

digit HLJCs (hydrologic unit codes) established by the U.S. Geological Survey (Figure

2.1-1). Table 3.1-2 provides data on the number of assessed waterbodies, segments and

types of waterbodies per the monitoring program for water-years 2005 - 2007. In the 4-

Rivers -upper Cumberland BMLJ, those data include 20 stream segments on 16 streams

in the one associated Ohio River subecoregional boundary (05140206); as well, the

Green — Tradewater BMU data includes 34 stream segments on 26 streams assessed in

the two adjacent Ohio River subregional boundaries HUCs (05140201, 05140202 and

05140203) (Figure 2.2-1). Most of these assessments stemmed from intensive multi-

agency watershed monitoring in 2005 and 2006. However, some data more than five

years old were considered valid this reporting period.

17

Table 3.1-2. Numbers of streams, stream segments, lakes and reservoirs assessed in theUpper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green - Tradewater BMUs of focusduring the 2005 and 2006 water-years.

Number of NumberBMU

Number of S~e~ Number of Number of ofStreams

Segments Lakes Reservoirs

SpringsUpper

Cumberland 410 562 12 19 0& 4-RiversGreen -

311 440 0 34 10TradewaterTotal 721 1002 12 53 10

The 4-Rivers -Upper Cumberland BMU has the greatest number of natural lakes

found in the commonwealth. Within this BMU 31 lakes and reservoirs were monitored,

including 12 natural lakes found in the Jackson Purchase region (relict coastal plain).

Those reservoirs monitored and assessed in the Green — Tradewater BMtJ numbered 34

(Table 3.1-2).

One waterbody type KDOW added to its monitoring program this monitoring

period was springs. These are significant resources in karstic regions of the state. The

Green — Tradewater BMU is the largest area of karst in Kentucky. As such, this

landscape has many sinkholes, caves (e.g. Mammoth Cave) and subsurface streams and

rivers, including associated springs. This portion ofsouth-central Kentucky has long

been an area of significant agricultural land uses, with a recent growing urban population,

especially in the Bowling Green area; therefore, there are many potential sources and

conduits to groundwater or subsurface (losing) streams for pollutants to readily flow into.

Given the sensitivity of groundwater, subsurface (losing) streams and associated surface

water resources to land uses in this porous limestone region, monitoring significant

springs was made a priority for the KDOW. This effort was undertaken by KDOW's

Groundwater Branch employing the Water Quality Branch's SOP used for surface water

quality monitoring programs. The locations of those monitored may be seen in Figure

3.1-1.

18

Figure 3.1-1. Mo

nito

red springs

ire the Green River basin, 20

06-7

.

~ Reservoirs

V My

-- &Di

git HUC Boundary

10

0

'10

20

30 Miles

~ C~~Counties

3.1.1 Ambient (Long-Term) Monitoring Network

Water Quality. Kentucky Division of Water's statewide ambient water quality

monitoring network consists of 70 fixed stations (Table 3.1.1-1 and Figure 3.1.1-1). This

network was expanded from 44 to 70 in 1998 following the watershed approach adopted

by the commonwealth in 1997. Ambient stations were located in the downstream and

mid-unit reaches of USGS 8-digit hydrologic unit codes upstream of major reservoirs and

in the downstream reaches of major tributaries. The 4-Rivers —Upper Cumberland BML1

had 14 ambient stations and the Green — Tradewater BMU had 17 ambient water quality

stations (Table 3.1.1-1). The ambient stations of a watershed management unit were

sampled monthly during the water-year the unit was in phase to be monitored. During

the other four water-years of the watershed cycle, sampling frequency was reduced to

bimonthly to devote more monitoring and laboratory resources to the rotating watershed

water quality network (discussed later). Field measurements were taken for pH,

dissolved oxygen, specific conductance and temperature; samples were analyzed for

nutrients, metals and pesticides and herbicides if the streams drained predominantly

agricultural areas. During the recreation season of May —October water quality samples

are also collected to determine if levels ofpathogen-indicating bacteria may be a concern

for people who may recreate in these waters. T'he purpose of the ambient water quality

network was to assess long-term conditions and trends on rivers and the larger streams of

the state. In addition to KDOW's network, long-term stations were maintained by

ORSANCO on the lower Licking, lower Big Sandy, lower Green, lower Tennessee and

lower Cumberland rivers and by the USGS on the lower. Tennessee River. Figures 3.1.1-

2, 3.1.1-3 and 3.1.1-4 give the locations of ambient monitored stations (including

associated biomonitored stations) in the upper Cumberland River basin, 4-Rivers basin

and the Green — Tradewater BMLJs, respectively.

Sediment Quality. Sediment quality was detemuned at the ambient stations

during the yeaz in which monitoring occurred in a watershed management unit. At this

time, sediment data supplement other data types; the data were not used for assessment,

rather for screening purposes.

Biology. Fish, macroinvertebrate and algae data from the ambient stations

provide long-term and trend information on mainstem of rivers and many major

i~17

tributaries. Most of the ambient biological stations were located on streams that also

have water quality monitoring.

Fish Tissue. Fish tissue samples were obtained from 13 waterbodies or locations

in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMLJ and 12 waterbodies or locations in the Green

— Tradewater BMU; additionally, 11 waterbodies or locations were monitored throughout

Kentucky related to advisories. Tissue was analyzed for methylmercury, selenium,

PCBs, chlordane, pesticides and herbicides. Results were used to determine if there were

potential problems with contaminants in fish tissue that required further sampling. These

results also were used to make fish consumption use support determinations. The

widespread pollutant of concern in Kentucky fishes was methylmercury. The following

criteria were used to determine level of use support: 0.0 — 0.30 ppm was full use support,

greater than 0.30 —1.0 ppm was partial support and greater than 1.0 ppm was nonsupport.

If results were not elevated, no further fish tissue sampling was conducted. This method

of assessment closely follows EPA's recommended application of basing water quality

evaluation on fish tissue concentrations.

21

Table 3.

1.1-

1. Statewide primary water quality sta

tion

s with upper Cumberland - 4-Rivers and Green - Tradewater BML7s

hig

hlig

hted

in bo

ld type.

River Bas

in &Stream

Station

HUC

Mile-

Loca

tion

La

titu

de

Lon ~~

i tude

Drainaee

Station Tvne

Big

San

dyaTug Fork

PRI002

0507

0201

35.1

at Ker

mit,

WV

37.8

379

-82.40970

1277

Tug Fork

PRI003

0507

0201

77.7

at Freeborn

37.56615

-82.14358

781

'Levisa Fork

PRI006

05070202

115.

0nr Pik

evil

le37

.464

35-8

2.52

589

1229

'Levisa Fork

PRI064

05070203

29.6

nr Louisa

38.1

160

-82.

6002

2323

aLev

isa Fork

PRI094

05070203

75.0

at Auxier

37.72905

-82.75436

1723

$Beaver Cr

eek

PRI095

05070203

95.0

at All

en37.60280

-82.72754

239

$Joh

ns Creek

PRI096

05070203

26.6

at McCombs

37.6

553

-82.5870

120

Lit

tle S

andv

eLittle Sa

ndy River

PRI049

05090104

13.2

at Argillite

38.49053

-82.83404

539

TXQarts Cre

ek° Tygarts Cre

ekPRI048

05090103

23.5

nr Lynn

38.5

997

-82.

9528

265

Cumberland Riv

erCumberland Riv

erPRI086

0513

0101

661.

0at

Calvin

36.72244

-83.62537

519

Cumberland River

PRI009

0513

0101

563.0

at Cum

berl

and

36.83558

-84.34015

1963

Fal

lsCle

ar Fork

PRI087

0513

0101

0.9

nr Wil

liam

sbur

g36

.726

17-84.14224

370

'Rockcastle Riv

erPRI010

05130102

24.7

at Billows

37.1'137

-84.29673

604

'Horse Lick Creek

PRI051

05130102

0.1

nr Lamero

37.32011

-84.13841

62

Cumberland River

PRI007

05130103

423.

0nr Bur

kesv

ille

36.6

8879

-85.

5667

06244

Buck Creek

PRI088

05130103

123

nr Dykes

37.0

601

-84.

4264

253

'S. Fk. Cumberland R

PRI008

05130104

44.8

at Blu

e He

ron

36.6

703

-84.

5492

964

'Li

ttle

River

PRI043

05130205

24.4

nr Cadiz

36.84104

-87.77731

268

Red River

PRI069

05130205

49

nr Keysburg

36.64063

-86.97961

519

hydr

olog

ic uni

t index si

temid-h

ydro

logi

c un

it ind

ex sit

eh y

drologic uni

t index si

teh y

drologic uni

t in

dex si

temid-h

ydro

logi

c un

it index sit

emaj

or tr

ibut

ary

infl

ow to Dewey Res

. major

trib

utar

y

hydrologic uni

t index si

te

hydrologic uni

t index si

te

mid-h

ydro

logi

c unit ind

ex sit

ehy

drologic unit i

ndex sit

e

maj

or tr

ibut

ary

hydrologic unit index si

tesp

ecia

l in

tere

st wat

ersh

edhy

drologic unit index si

temaj

or trib

utar

yhy

drologic uni

t index sit

emaj or tr

ibut

ary

hydrologic uni

t index si

te

Tabl

e 3.1.1-1 (cont.). Statewide primary wat

er quality stations wi

th upper Cumberland - 4-Rivers an d Green - Tradewater BMUs

hig

hlig

hted

in bo

ld type

River Bas

in &Stream

Stat

ion

HLTC

Mile

- Lo

cati

on

Latitu

de

Longitude

Drai

nage

St

atio

n Twe

N w

Kent

uck River

e Eag

le Creek

Ken

tuck

y River

Kentucky River

Ken

tuck

y River

eElk

horn

Creek

eDix River

Silver Creek

Ken

tuck

y River

Red

River

N. Fo

rk Ken

tuck

y River

Troublesome Creek

'Middle Fk. Ken

tuck

y R.

'So

uth Fork Ken

tuck

y R.

Red

Bird River

Goo

se Creek

Lic

kin~

Rive

rLicking River

$Slate Creek

$Lic

king

River

'N. Fo

rk Lic

king

River

e S. Fork Lic

king

River

°Hin

ksto

n Creek

Ston

er Creek

bI,i

ckin

g River

Licking River

Licking River

PRI022

05100205

21.5

at Gle

nco

38.7061

-84.8254

437


tePRI024

05100205

64.8

at Franl~ort

38.2

129

-84.

8721

5409


tePRI

066

05100205

30.5

nr Lockport

38.4450

-84.9569

6177

hydrologic unit i

ndex sit

ePRI067

05100205

119.0

at Hig

h Bridge

37.8

201

-84.

7051

4587

hydr

olog

ic unit i

ndex sit

ePRI098

05100205

10.3

nr Pea

ks Mil

l38

.268

6-8

4.81

429

473

majo

r tributary

PRI

045

05100205

34.7

nr Dan

vill

e37.64176

-84.66113

318

hydr

olog

ic unit i

ndex

sit

ePRI099

05100205

5.9

nr Ruthton

37.73251

-84.43674

111

majo

r trib

utar

yPRI058

0510

0204

171.5

nr Tra

pp37

.846

75-84.08182

3235

hydrologic unit i

ndex

sit

ePRI046

0510

0204

21.6

Clay Cit

y37

.864

68-83.93316

362

hydr

olog

ic unit i

ndex sit

ePRI031

0510

0201

49.7

Jackson

37.55127

-83.38464

1101

hydr

olog

ic unit index si

tePRI

090

0510

0201

7.2

nr Clayhole

37.4

6722

-83.27936

194

major trib

utar

yPRI032

05100202

8.4

nr Tallega

37.5

5505

-83.59373

536

hydr

olog

ic unit i

ndex sit

ePRI033

05100203

12.1

at Boo

nevi

lle

37.4

7513

-83.

6708

2692

hydr

olog

ic unit i

ndex sit

ePRI

091

05100203

5.5

nr One

ida

37.2

3690

-83.

6450

019

2ma

jor tributary

PRI

092

05100203

3.4

nr One

ida

37.2

3280

-83.69103

251

major trib

utar

y

PRI062

0510

0101

226

at West Liberty

37.9

1470

-83.

2616

9335

infl

ow to Cave Run Reservoir

PRI093

0510

0101

10.0

nr Owingsville

~38

.141

5-8

3.72

85185

major tr

ibut

ary

PRI061

0510

0101

78.2

at Claysville

38.52058

-84.

1831

019

96mi

d-hy

drol

ogic

unit index si

tePRI

060

0510

0101

6.9

nr Mil

ford

38.58123

-84.16566

287

majo

r tr

ibut

ary

PRI

059

05100102

11.7

at Morgan

38.6

033

-84.4008

838

hydr

olog

ic unit i

ndex

sit

ePRI102

05100102

0.2

at Ruddles Mil

l38.30471

-84.

2377

8259

majo

r tr

ibut

ary

PRI

101

05100102

0.6

nr Ruddles Mill

38.3

029

-84.

2497

283

majo

r tr

ibut

ary

PRI

111

0510

0101

35.5

at Butler

38.7898

-84.3674

3384

hydrologic unit i

ndex si

tePRI

062

0510

0101

226

at West Liberty

37.9

1470

-83.26169

335

infl


PRI062

0510

0101

226

at West Li

berty

37.9

1470

-83.26169

335.

infl


Table 3.1.1-1(cont.).Statewide primary water quality stations with upper Cumberland- 4 -

Rivers and Green -

Tradewater BMLJs

h ighlighted in bold type.

River Basin &Stream

Station

HUC

Mile-

Location

Latitude

Longitude

Drainaee

Station Tvoe

point

dd)

dd)

miZ

Ohio River Tnbutary

'Kinniconick Creek

PRI063

05090201

10.4

nr Tannery

38.57458

-83.18811

229

major tributary

Salt River

aSalt River

PRI029

05140102

22.9

at Shepherdsville

37.98524

-85.71720

1197

hydrologic unit index site

'Salt River

PRI052

05140102

82.5

at Glensboro

38.00231

-85.06028

173

major reservoir inflow

Brashears Creek

PRI105

05140102

1.2

at Taylorsville

38.03040

-85.35154

262

major tributary

BFloyds Fork

PRI100

05140102

7.4

nr Shepherdsville

38.03447

-85.65936

259

major tributary

BRolling Fork

PRI057

05140103

123

nr Lebanon Jct.

37.82267

-85.74787

1374


$Beech Fork

PRI041

05140103

48.0

nr Maud

37.83266

-85.29610

436

major tributary

Green River

'Green River

PRI018

05110001

226.0

at Munfordville

37.2687

-85.8853

1680


~

Green River

PRI076

05110001

334.0

at Neatsville

37.1919

-85.1303

339


'Nolin River

PRI021

05110001

80.9

at White Mills

37.55536

-86.03182

351


-tributary

'Russell Creek

PRI077

05110001

10.0

nr Bramlett

37.16790

-85.47005

264

major tributary

Little Barren River

PRI078

05110001

6.3

nr Monroe

37.2264

-85.6776

250

major tributary

Bear Creek

PRI075

05110001

11.8

nr Huff

37.2488

-86.3612

137

major tributary

Barren River

PRI072

05110002

1.0

nr Woodbury

37.17069

-86.62052

2264

hydrologic unit i

ndex site

Drakes Creek

PRI074

05110002

8.0

nr Bowling Green

36.93492

-86.39227

5487

major tributary

Green River

PRI055

05110003

72.0

at Livermore

37.47832

-87.12694

6428


Mud River

PRI056

05110003

17.4

nr Gus

37.12324

-86.90042

268

major tributary

Green River

PRI103

05110003

150.0

nr Woodbury

37.18242

-86.61034

3136

hydrologic unit i

ndex site

Rough River

PRI014

05110004

62.5

nr Dundee

37.54720

-86.72139

757

mid-


Rough River

PRI054

05110004

1.0

nr Livermore

37.49934

-87.06574

1068

hydrologic unit i

ndex site

bPanther Creek

PRI113

05110005

2.7

nr West Louisville

37.72497

-8731513

371

major tributary

Pond River

PRI012

05110006

12.4

nr Sacramento

37.44179

-87.35285

578


Table 3.

1.1-

1 (cont.). Statewide primary wat

er quality stations wi

th upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater BMIJs

h ighlighted in

bold ty

pe.

River Bas

in &Stream

Stat

ion

HUC

Mile-

anon

Lati

tude

Lon~'tude

Drai

nage

St

atio

n Tune

Ohio River Tributary

bHighland Creek

Tradewater River

'' ~'I'radewater River

Tennessee River

Cla

rks River

W. Fork Clarks River

PRI1

10

05140102

14.0

nr Smi

th Mil

l

PRI

112

0514

0205

25.0

nr Pin

ey

PRI

106

06040006

17.6

~nr S

harpe

PRI

107

06040006

8.6

nr Sym

soni

a

37.7

5699

-87.79514

145

3 7.39896

-87.90456

618

36.96130

-88.49322

310

3 6.93245

-88.

5439

6186

majo

r trib

utar

y

hydrologic uni

t index si

te

hydrologic uni

t index sit

emaj

or trib

utar

y

Mississippi River

'' bBayou de Chien

PRI109

0801

0201

13.6

nr Cayce

36.61543

-89.

0302

5 10

3 major trib

utar

y'

Mayfield Creek

PRI042

0801

0201

13

.7

nr Magee Spr

ings

36.92989

-88.

9429

7 274

major trib

utar

y~

aLon

g-te

rm ambient wat

er quality stations that aze als

o long-term ambient biological mon

itor

ing stations

bStations created since 2004 (t

hese

were cha

nges

nec

essa

ry for sam

pler

saf

ety issues)

Figu

re ~~~

.~-'

~, F

ixed

(lo

ng-t

erm]

~r~- ~

bien

i su

rfac

e wa

der qu

a9it

y network.

~l

N

~'

,~

II

F

~.\ A

-, ~

~-..

~~_

,~'M ~ ~~

,_. ~i"'~' :

Jam..

'~' \

~ ~ \~

~~, '*i!

• .~y

';~ ~

~1t:

?ter ~ '—

C._

~`k~

,

/ ~ '

`"~`` ...

- ~ ~

Y....

I it

t ,y''^v~~"

~`~ ~5~~ ~.

~_

`t ~ ~ w

i

,, r

1

_~.

~

40

Q

40

80 (

vlil

es~} Primary St

atio

nStreams >/=4th Order

--- r_~IC,]1I HAG

County

— --~~---

Figure 3.1

.1-2

. Targeted bio

logi

cal (

incl

udin

g probabilistic sites) and ambient uva

ter qu

alit

y monitoring

in upp

er Cumberland River ba

sin.

_~

~ .~

^

Some

rset

1

N v

i i

"~

_ ~r~—

_~

~~~.~

=:,~_

a~ ~~~

~a1~

./

~~(n ~

~} ~I

~~

~

~

~~--

-_~

-

- --

;_Bur

kesv

ille

Wi

llia

msbu

rg

20

0

20

40 ~A

iles

`~

* Ambient Wa

ter Qu

alit

y Station

Pro

babi

list

ic Bio

logi

cal Site

Target Bi

olog

ical

Sat

ion

Reservoirs uc.shp

Streams >/=~Ith Ord

er

Q Ci

ty

&Digit HUC

0 County

..

i -__._

F igure 3.1

.1-3

. Ta

rget

bio

logi

cal (

including probabilistic sites) and ambient vua

ter qu

alit

y monitoring in 4-R

iver

s ba

sin.

i ~ ` I

N

r-

..1

~,

'\

~' 20

0

20

40 ~

/iil

es

l~—

i ~

~~

~\

~

~

4 ~~

.~~~~~

~ ~ -

J -

- ,.~---=

*Am

bien

t Wa

ter Quality Station

~Pr

obab

ilis

tic Bi

olog

ical

Station

l"ar

get Biological Station

Lake

s_4r

iver

s.sh

pStreams >/=

4th Or

der

QCi

ty8-Digit NUC

~_ J

County

Hickman,

Murr

ay

figure 3.1

.E-4

. Ta

rget

ed bio

logi

cal (

incl

udin

g probabilistic si

tes}

and amb

ient

wat

er qua

lity

monitoring st

atio

nsin Green - Tradewater BMIJe

N

Ovaensboro

ry

t~

-- ~-.

_ El

izab

etht

own

'~ ~

~

~-

---

..

f

y~

.v

'

~

Liberty

~

~

v~

^Tf

~,

~ _ ,~

x

~

~~ ~~

~ t

i~

~~

_ -

Madi

sonv

ille

'

~ ~

`--;

~

l~.

* Ambient Waier Quality St

atio

n

Bowling Green

~ ~

` ~

~`~

~

Prob

abil

isti

c Bi

osur

vey Si

te__

___.

___ _ ___—__

_ _

$ T

arge

ted

biological sta

tion

s

20

p

20

4G Mi

les

---

- ~ Spring Station

Streams ~/=4th Order

- Reservoir

8-Di

git HUC

~

City

Cou

nty

3.1.2 Rotating Watershed Network

An interagency monitoring team established several objectives for the one-yeaz

watershed water quality monitoring stations. The objectives were to: 1) obtain an overall

representation of the quality of the basin's water resources; 2) determine water quality

conditions associated with major land cover or land uses such as forest, urban, agriculture

and mining; 3) chazacterize the basin's least impacted waters; and 4) collect data for

establishing total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) as required by Section 303(d) of the

Clean Water Act. Parameters analyzed were similar to those described earlier for the

ambient network.

The Division of Environmental Services, the laboratory of the Kentucky

Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet, analyzed water quality samples collected

by KDOW. The rotating watershed water quality monitoring network consisted of 16

stations in the upper Cumberland River basin and 14 stations in the 4-Rivers basin

(Tables 3.1.2-1; 3.1.2-; and 3.1.2-). The Green — Tradewater BMU had 30 rotating water

quality stations. Rotating stations were typically located at the downstream reaches of

USGS 11-digit watersheds; however, some streams with particular issue of concern were

monitored in this network for that singular reason (Figures 3.1.2-1; 3.1.2-2; and 3.1.2-3).

Monthly sampling was conducted over the 12-month watershed monitoring period April

2005 —March 2006 in the Upper Cumberland and 4-Rivers BMCT and April 2006 —

March 2007 in the Green - Tradewater BMiJ to characterize water quality of each

watershed represented, The KDOW follows water quality sample collection and

preservation procedures found in its water quality monitoring SOP (2005).

3.13 Swimming Advisory Monitoring

KDOW continued to sample areas with long-standing swimming advisories in

three basins in 2007: 10 sites in the upper Cumberland River basin on seven streams, 18

watersheds or sites in the Northern Kentucky azea (lower Licking River basin) and four

sites on the North Fork Kentucky River basin from Chavies to headwaters.

In 2007 the KDOW began monitoring large reservoirs for pathogen indicator

(Escherichia coh~. This effort will result in 12 reservoirs, mostly COE dam projects,

being monitored for PCR at significant recreation azeas.

30

Table 3.1.2-1. Rotatin¢ watershed water auality stations.

Site ID Stream Latitude Lon gifade Mile Point Description

Upper Cumberland River Basin(Apri12005 -March 2006)

CRW008 Marrowbone 36.78639 -85.42019 1.2 nr LeslieCreek

CRW009 Croccus Creek 36.86561 -85.33877 2.4 nr Bakertown

CRWO10 Roundstone 37.33535 -84.23246 0.5 nr LivingstonCreek

CRWO 11 Middle Fork 37.343 S 1 -84.08069 4.6 nr ParrotRockcastle R.

CRW012 South Fork 37.29631 -84.09319 5.3 nr CorvetteRockcastle R.

CRW014 Laurel River 37.042 -84.04831 31.3 nr Lily

CRWO15 Mazsh Creek 36.74389 -84.371 7.2 nr Sand Hill

CRW016 Jellico Creek 36.74549 -84.26594 5.4 nr Duckrun

CRW017 Richland Creek 36.86901 -83.89800 1.8 nrBazbourville

CRW018 Straight Creek 36.7735 -83.66989 0.2 nr Straight Cr

CRW019 Yellow Creek 36.70981 -83.64492 1.0 nr Ponza

CRW020 Poor Fork 36.89331 -83.26561 5.4 at RosspointCumberland River

CRW021 Clover Fork 36.861 -83.29181 1.9 at Golden AshCumberland River

CRW022 Martins Fork 36.84720 -83.32554 2.8 nr Hazlan

CRW023 Pitman Creek 37.04573 -84.57631 5.95 at CabinHollow Brdg

31

Table 3.1.2-1 (cont.). Rotating watershed water quality stations.

Site ID Stream Latitude Lon ~ifade Mile Point Description ~

Upper Cumberland River Basin(Apri12005 —March 2006, cont.)

CRW024 Pitman Creek 37.04391 -84.59591 7.0 at SomersetSTP

32

Figu

re 3.1

.2-1

. Up

per Cumberland River basin rot

atin

g wa

ters

hed water qu

alit

y stations mon

itor

ed 2005-6.

W W

N~,

""

/~!

-

r

l

5 '

t

('

. _

__"

f t

Middle Fork I~~castle River

Som

erse

t ~u~dstgne Creek

~.

~ ~, , j

~ uth Foek Rockcastle River _

`". ~

1.

`~ ~~.

rte' _

c

~

r..

'

~

.,

'.. ( . t'.,

~

V r,

l _/

_

'`

r t

'"

Harlan

,,;

~_~

Pitman

k it

Gree

Laurel~R'

.r'"

_ -

._

~ _-

!___

k~ ~ ~

`-"

-~, y ~~ P~oF

r.

mberland River

~~o~cus C ek

~ ~

~ Richla

Creek

_ r`

,- —

--

-~

`

Clover For.IrCumberland River

,.~'

~—,

i _

MarroV~bdne Cree

'~ Jefli

eek

trai ht,~re

~ Martins~For

Cumberland River

~. _.

~'

Mshr'Creek

g ~

~

-

f,, -

,~

Bur

kesv

ifle

~I/illiarnsburg

* R

olaiing Water Quality Station

Reservoir

Streams >/=4th Order

~

City

20

0

20

40 Miles

8-Digit HUC

— -

County

Table 3.1.2-2. Rotating watershed water quality stations in 4-Rivers (lower Cumberland,

Mississippi, Ohio and Tennessee rivers) basins.

Site ID Stream Latitude Longitude Mile Point Description

4-Rivers Basin(Apri12005 - Mazch 2006)

MRW001 Ma~eld Creek 36.81889 -88.63039 38.6 nr Hickory

N1RW002 Wilson Creek 36.93381 -88.88581 0.7 nr Cunning-

MRW003 Obion Creek 36.64939 -89.12261 8.7

MRW004 Terrapin Creek 36.50866 -88.49890 3.4

ORW001 Shawnee Creek 37.01519 -89.09711 2.7

TRW001 Cypress Creek 37.02939 -88.52219 3.1

TRW002 Panther Creek 36.80556 -88.52219 1.3

CRW001 Livingston Cr 37.14311 -88.1635 5.8

CRW002 Muddy Fork 36.91389 -87.84419 5.7Little River

CRW003 Sinking Fork 36.84069 -87.74081 4.1

CRW004 W Fk Red R. 36.65161 -87.37769 16.1

CRW005 Whippoorwill) 36.69690 -86.96334 4.5Creek

RED001 Red River 36.67819 -86.93212 57.4

RED002 S Fk Red R. 36.66722 -86.89700 2.6

ham

at WhaynesComer

nr Bell City

nr Wickliffe

nr CalvertCity

nr Hicksville

nr Dycusburg

nr Cadiz

nr Cadiz

nr Oak

nr Dot

at Logan MillRoad

at BarrensPlain Road

o ~.

34

..-

w

figure 3.x

.2-2a ~-Rivers rot

atin

g w~~~r

c~Lial

ifiv ~

ta~t

iot~

~ m~

ni~o

re~ 2005-~0

~aci~~c~h

r

ilawn

ee Cr

'.R

Hic

kman

?

__---~-

.~ Murray

~0

0

1d

20

30

40 Mils

~~~

.

may

_

~-

Hopk

insv

ille

--

~~

g ad"'

SinkingjC

-

~

M"".

~~(

I"~~

i ~

~

'~

~ Whippo

'll Cr

Re

ive ;

W Fork Red R

S.F. Red River

J

*

Rot2tine~ ~1

Vate

r Qua_ li

ty Station

Reservoir

-- County

~.j

CiiY

8-D

igit

HUC

`Stream ~!=

4th Order

Table 3.1.2-3. Rotating watershed water quality stations, Green - Tradewater Basin

Management Unit (coot.).

Site ID Stream Latitude Lon ~ifade Mile Point Descriktion

Green - Tradewater BMiJ(April 2006 - Mazch 2007)

GRN001 Cypress Creek/ 37.57910 -88.09751 2.1 nr Dakoven

Dennis O'Nan Ditch

GRN002 Relict Cypress 37.5304 -87.9751 2.2 nr Sturgis

Creek Channel

GRN003 Vaughn Ditch 37.46343 -87.89834 2.3 nr Derby

GRN004 Clear Creek 37.3425 -87.8003 1.5 nr Providence

GRN005 Donaldson Cr. 37.284 -87.8103 2.3 nr Fryer

GRN006 Tradewater R. 37.123 -87.6392 104.0 nr DawsonSprings

GRN012 Deer Creek 37.573 -87.46500 3.1 Onton

GRN013 Cypress Creek 37.50908 -87.31656 3.3 nr Ramsey

GRN014 W. Fk. Pond R. 37.157 -87.3598 2.2 nr MountCarmel

GRN017 Pond Creek 3730068 -87.00449 1.8 nr Martwick

GRN028 Pond River 37.12222 -87.31946 60.5 nr Apex

GRNOl8 Wolf Lick Cr. 37.0416 -86.95414 4.2 nr Dunmore

GRN019 Muddy Creek 37.18390 -86.77307 5.2 nr Dunbaz

GRN020 Gasper River 37.02207-86.60702 12.2 nr Hadley

GRN021 W. Fk. Drakes 36.83858 -86.42451 1.2 nr Boyce

Creek

GRN022 Trammel Creek 36.845 -86.3494 5.5 nr Allen Spgs

GRN023 Beaver Creek 36.9898 -85.9754 3.2 nr Glasgow

36

Table 3.1.2-3 (cont.). Rotating watershed water quality stations, Green - TradewaterBasin Management Unit (coot.).

Site ID Stream Latitude Longitude Mile Point Description

Green - Tradewater BMLT(Apri12006 -March 200

GRN024 Skaggs Creek 36.9073 -85.939 5.9 nr Roseville

GRN025 Big Pitman Cr. 37.27303 -85.55374 3.1 nr Greens-burg

GRN026 Casey Creek 37.22388 -85.19682 0.8 Knifely

GRN029 Falling Timber 36.93916 -85.73713 11.3 nr SummerCreek Shade

GRN030 E. Fk. Little 36.99604 -85.52349 19.6 at MosbyBarren River Ridge Rd

GRNO11 Blackford Cr. 37.89885 -86.98628 3.7 nr Maceo

GRN009 S. Fk. Panther 37.6794 -87.09078 1.7 nr SutherlandCreek

GRN007 Canoe Creek 37.802 -87.6247 3.5 nr Henderson

GRNO15 Caney Creek 37.52621 -88.68663 1.85 nr Olaton

GRN031 Little Short 37.55447 -86.56852 0.6 at SR 736Creek

GRN032 Pond Run 37.58713 -86.6201 2.7 nr Shreve

GRN016 Rough River 37.6098 -86.2588 129.9 at HardinSprings

GRN027 Valley Creek 37.61141 -85.93063 2.2 nr Glendale

37

Figure 3.x

.2-3

. Green-Tra~ewater ~Mt~

ro~a~ing watershed wat

er qua

lity

st~tion~ monitored 20

06-7

~.

W

N

Owe

nsbo

ro

- ~l

iz~b

etht

ovun

lCange~Gr

~ ~ ~.

~Dl~ckiord C. ~

~„_

~,

q -

- -

--

~

-

_ ~ ~

on

'~~~ "~

i

Pon

d P•.un

,. -

__,

—~

-,~ ~~,

--

~--

~ -

~,,~

1Nol

t•G~

~` ~ *

~`

~ ';. E FI; Lithe barren

P.Be,

Beve

r C.*

~

. _

_.~

/~-'

,~,

~Faliing.tm~bi~r--

~VIa

dIS0

11V1

11B

1 ~

--

~/

~ra~mei~r *

Skag

gs Ct

~- - :.,

~"~

W Fi;

Dra

kes

Bowling Green

j`

~ ~-

S'Fk

Panther Cr

'~ ,

\,:.

~ ~Ik'1@fty

'~

~ De

er Cr

Pond Run

*,

f

_ ..~

~~~.

.~.

~.

r

..__

_ ~

- -:

__:

~:~'~Cyp~ss Cr

*Cypress Cr `'

~anay.~Cr

_~#

~

'~ .v~

Valley Cr

-

DenNs O~an~itoh *aughn Din

h /~ *

,-

~

Little Sho

rt Cr

y~~

l

J~ '

, .;

._ ;

.. -

/.. ..

..~

:'_,

„ ,

~ ._.__

J~ -

—' - "r"

~,~...

'~-_ate

__

--..

--

~

.__

--~_._

~ _,4

~le2r 9f:~-

~

+.Pond Cr . "" _

-. ~~

t

,r _

~1, ,

Donaldson Cr('

~

r

---a~

~

~~, .Y

_ ~

-- " '

Sig Pi

tman

Cr

{ ~Auddy~ Cr

asey~Cr

~~

VI FkiP

d R

'*

20

0

20

40 Miles

--

-----

- - -

- - ~~

* Rotalinc~ Water Qua

lity

Sta

tion

Stream >~

=4[h

Order

~ Reservoir

~

City

e-a~9i

t riuc

-- Counry

3.1.4 Biomonitoring and Biosurvey Programs

Introduction. There are four biological monitoring programs within KDOW.

Those programs have the same primary purpose of assessing the aquatic life use support

of streams in the commonwealth. Although each program is driven by broad objectives,

together they provide a comprehensive program that addresses aquatic life use attainment

from several approaches: 1) random, overall snapshot of the ambient conditions; 2) the

integration of conditions in relatively lazge watersheds monitored for long-term trend

evaluation; 3) impact assessments related to nonpoint source pollution; 4) impact

assessments related to point source pollution; and 5) a regional reference program to

assess least impacted streams for development and refinement of metric benchmarks used

to assess lotic ecosystems.

Reference Reach Program. In 1991, KDOW began a Reference Reach (RR)

program to gather data from the state's least impacted streams. Biologists first identified

potential least impacted waters representative of Level-III Ecoregions. Then, data on

physicochemical water quality, sediment quality, fish tissue residue, habitat condition,

and biotic conditions were collected to define the potential environmental quality for the

streams of a particulaz ecoregion; this to provide a baseline to compare other streams in

the same ecoregion to those reference conditions. Data from the reference reach program

provided the basis for the development of narrative and numerical biocriteria for the

various ecoregions of the commonwealth; results indicated multimetric indices could be

developed resulting in four bioregions. Fifty-five stream sites from seven Level-III

Ecoregions were initially sampled in the spring and fall of 1992-1993. Since that time,

many additional potential reference reach streams were sampled. Some were adopted as

reference reach streams; others were rejected because they did not possess adequate

quality to represent least impacted condition. Currently, 150 RR streams totaling

approximately 1,102 miles are identified throughout the commonwealth (Table 3.1.4-1).

Forty-four (141.7 miles) candidate exceptional or reference reach streams, or segments,

are proposed for inclusion in 401 KAR 5:030 during the triennial review submission,

20.08 (Table 3.1.4-2).

39

Table 3.1.4-1. Reference reach streams in Kentucky with those in bold to emphasizestreams in the upper Cumberland - 4-Rivers and Green - TradewaterBMLJs.

Start End TotalStream Coun Location Basin Se ment Se ment MilesHobbs Fork Martin Mouth to headwaters Big Sandy 3.8 0.0 3.8

Hobbs Fork, UT Martin Hobbs Fork to headwaters Big Sandy 0.55 0.0 0.55

Lower Pigeon Branch Pike Left Fork to headwaters Big Sandy 1.7 0.5 1.2

Russell Fork Pike Clinch Field RR Yd off SR 80 to Big Sandy 16.0 14.4 1.6Kentuck - Vir inia state line

Toms Branch Pike Mouth to headwaters Big Sandy 1.4 0.1 13

Cane Creek Whitley 0.1 mi below Daylight Branch Upper 11.5 7.0 4.5Cumberland

Bark Camp Creek Whitley U.S. Forest Service Rd 193 bridge Upper 7.6 2.6 5Cumberland

Bad Branch Letcher 0.2 mi above KY 932 bridge Upper 3.0 0.0 3Cumberland

Beaver Creek McCreary Mouth to Freeman and Middle Upper 6.5 0.0 6.5forks Cumberland

Brownies Creek Bell, Harlan Blacksnake Branch to headwaters Upper 16.0 9.0 7.0Cumberland

Brushy Creek Pulaski Mouth to headwaters Upper 16.0 0.0 16.0Cumberland

Buck Creek Pulaski Off Bud Rainey Rd Upper 62.6 28.9 33.7Cumberland

Bunches Creek Whitley Mouth to headwaters Upper 3.3 0.0 3.3Cumberland

Cogur Fork McCreary Mouth to headwaters Upper 7.9 0.0 7.9Cumberland

Dog Slaughter Creek Whitley Mouth to North and South forks Upper 1.1 0.0 1.1Cumberland

Eagle Creek McCreary KY 896 bridge Upper 6.3 3 3.3Cumberland

Fugitt Creek ~ Harlan Land use change to headwaters Upper 4.9 0.5 4.4Cumberland

South Fork Dog Slaughter Whitley 1000 ft above foot bridge (Dog Upper 4.6 0.0 4.6Creek Slau hter Falls Trail Cumberland

Marsh Creek McCreary Laurel Creek to headwaters Upper 26.2 8.6 17.8Cumberland

Horse Lick Creek Jackson Mouth to Clover Bolcom Upper 12.3 0.0 12.3Cumberland

Indian Creek McCreary Laurel Fork to Barren Fork Upper 6.7 2.3 4.4Cumberland

Howards Creek Clinton Dale Hollow Lake backwaters to Upper 3.4 0.8 2.6headwaters Cumberland

Jackie Branch Whitley Mouth to headwaters Upper 1.7 0.0 1.7Cumberland

Laurel Fork of Clear Fork Whitley Tennessee state line to Tiny Upper 13.0 4.2 8.8Branch/Pine Creek Cumberland

Laurel Fork of Middle Fork Jackson Mouth to headwaters Upper 12.2 0.0 12.2Rockcastle River CumberlandLittle South Fork McCreary/ River mile 35.5 to river mile 14.5 Upper 14.5 4.1 10.4Cumberland River Wa ne CumberlandLittle South Fork McCreary/ Mouth to Lanham Branch Upper 35.6 0.0 35.6Cumberland River Wa ne Cumberland

►.~

Table 3.1.4-1 (cont.). Reference reach streams in Kentucky with those in bold to emphasize those instreams u er Cumberland - 4-Rivers and Green - Tradewater BMiJs.

Stream Coun Location BasinStart

Se mentEnd

Se entTotalMiles

Middle Fork RockcastleRiver

Jackson Mouth to Horselick Creek UpperCumberland

7.8 0.0 7.8

Mud Camp Creek Monroe/Cumberland

UT to headwaters UpperCumberland

8.4 3.7 4.7

Mud Camp Creek Cumberland Mouth to Collins Branch UpperCumberland

1.3 0.0 1.3

Poor Fork CumberlandRiver

Letcher Franks Creek to headwaters UpperCumberland

51.7 46.1 5.6

Presley House Branch Letcher Mouth to headwaters UpperCumberland

1.5 0.0 1.5

Puncheoncamp Branch McCreary Mouth to headwaters UpperCumberland

1.9 0/0 1.9

Rock Creek McCreary Kentucky -Tennessee state lineriver mile 21.9 to White Oak Cr.

UpperCumberland

21.5 3.9 17.8

Rock Creek, unidentifiedtribute

McCreary Mouth to headwaters UpperCumberland

1.9 0.0 1.9

Rock Creek, unidentifiedtribute

McCreary Mouth to headwaters UpperCumberland

1.15 0.0 1.15

Shilalah Creek Bell River mile 5.5 to Clear Fork YellowCreek

UpperCumberland

5.5 0.0 5.5

Sinking Creek Laurel Mouth to White Oak Creek UpperCumberland

9.8 0.0 9.8

South Fork Dog SlaughterCreek

Whitley Basin to Dog Slaughter Creek UpperCumberland

4.6 0.0 4.6

Sulphur Creek Clinton Dale Hollow Lake backwaters toheadwaters

UpperCumberland

5.1 1.7 3.4

Watts Branch McCreary Mouth to headwaters UpperCumberland

Z.6 0.0 2.6

Watts Creek Harlan Basin above Camp Blanton Lakeriver mile 4.3 to river mile 2.2

UpperCumberland

4.3 2.2 2.1

Beaverdam Creek Edmonson KY 101-259 bride Green 14.0 7.6 6.4Cane Run Hart River mile 6.5 to river mile 1.0 Green 6.5 1.0 5.5Trammel Fork Allen Mouth to KY - TN state line Green 30.15 0.0 30.15Lick Creek Sim son Mouth to headwaters Green 9.9 0.0 9.9Peter Creek Barren Candy Fork to Dry Fork Green 18.5 11.6 7.9Caney Fork Barren Source to river mile 0.85 Green 6.6 0.0 6.6

Clifty Creek Todd Little Clifty Creek to Sulphur Lick Green 13.2 7.7 5.5

Clifty Creek Grayson Barton Runt to Western KY Pkwy Green 17.2 7.3 9.9

E. Fork Little Barren River Metcalfe Red Lick Creek to Flat Lick Creek Green 20.Z 19/0 1.2

Elk Lick C

Falling Timber Creek Metcalfe Land use change to headwaters Green 15.5 7.0 S.5

Fiddlers Creek Breckenridge Mouth to headwaters Green 5.8 0.0 5.8

Forbes Creek Christian Mouth to UT Green 3.9 0.0 3.9

Gasper River Logan Clear Fork to Wiggington Creek Green 35.2 17.0 18.2

Goose Creek Casey, Russell Mouth to Little Goose Creek Green S.1 0.0 8.1

Green River, UT Adair Land use change to headwaters Green 3.2 0.8 2.4

Halls Creek Ohio UT to headwaters Green 1Z.1 9.6 2.5

Cinders Creek Hardin Mouth to Sutzer Creek Green 7.7 0.0 7.7

Little Short Creek Grayson Mouth to headwaters Green 3.0 0.0 3.0

41

Table 3.1.4-1 (cont.). Reference reach streams in Kentucky with those in bold to emphasize those instreams u er Cumberland - 4-Rivers and Green - Tradewater BMUs


Se entEnd

Se entTotalMiles

Lynn Camp Creek Hart Mouth to Lindy Creek Green 8.3 0.0 8.3

McFarland Creek Christian,Ho kins

Grays Branch to UT Green 4.8 1.4 3.4

Meeting Creek Hardin Little Meeting Cr to Petty Branch Green 13.8 5.2 8.3

Muddy Creek Ohio Land use change to headwaters Green 15.5 13.0 2.5

North Fork Rough River Breckenridge Buffalo Creek to Reservoir dam Green 28.1 23.44 4.66

Pond Run Breckenridge,Ohio

Lane use change to headwaters Green 6.8 1.4 5.4

Rough River Hardin Lenders Creek to Vertrees Creek Green 147.8 136.9 10.9

Russell Creek Adair, Russell Mouth to headwaters Green 68.1 0.0 68.1

Sixes Creek Ohio Wild Branch to headwaters Green 7.5 2.0 5.5

Sulphur Branch Edmonson Mouth to headwaters Green 2.0 0.0 2.0

W. Fork Pond River Christian UT to East Branch Pond River Green 22.5 1Z.7 9.8

UT, White Oak Creek Adair Hovious Road Crossing to SR 76 Green 3.0 0.4 2.6

Goose Creek Casey Off Brock Rd Green 14.6 5.6 9.0

Drennon Creek Hen Flat Bottom Rd crossin Kentuck 10.5 11.9 1.4

Indian Creek Carroll H 36 bride Kentuck 0.55 4.7 4.15

Musselman Creek Grant Lawrenceville -Keefer Rd bridge Kentucky 2.6 8.4 5.8

Clear Creek Woodford Hefner Rd bridge, 2.1 mi S ofMortonsvil(e

Kentucky 4.1 19.0 14.9

Station Camp Creek Estill Off KY Hwy 1209 at Estill-JacksonCoun bound

Kentucky 19.0 22.3 33

South Fork Station CampCreek

Jackson KY 89 bridge Kentucky 53 48.6 43.3

Stur eon Creek Lee Off Stur eon Creek Rd Kentuc 4.0 31.1 27.3

°Sul hur Creek Franklin Mouth to headwaters Kentuck 0.0 5.2 5.2

Gladie Creek Menefee 0.2 mi u stream of brid e Kentuck 0.0 8.4 8.4

East Fork Indian Creek Menefee 1 mi upstream of West Fork IndianCr

Kentucky 0.0 8.5 8.5

Wol en Branch Menefee at SR 715 bred e Kentuck 0.0 3.3 3.3

Ri t Fork Buffalo Creek Owsle Off Whoo flarea Rd Kentuck 0.0 11.2 11.2

Buffalo Creek Owsle Side road alon mainstem Kentuck 0.8 12.8 12.0

Coles Fork Breathitt in Robinson Forest Kentuck 0.0 5.5 5.5

°Craig Creek Leslie Mouth to UT Kentucky 0.0 2.7 2.7

Elisha Creek Leslie Elisha Creek Road Kentuc 0.95 3.3 2.35

Line Fork Creek Letcher offKY 160 Kentuck 17.3 27.5 10.2

'Rock Lick Creek Jackson Mouth to headwaters Kentuck 0.0 9.6 9.6

Blackwater Creek Mor an Eaton Creek to Greas Creek Lickin 3.8 11.4 7.6

Brush Fork Pendleton Mouth to headwaters Lickin 0.0 5.7 5.7

North Fork Lickin River Moran Cave Run L. backwaters to Devils Fk Lickin 14.2 9.9 4.3

Bucket Branch Mor an Leisure -Paz on Rd bred e Lickin 0.0 1.9 1.9

Devils Fork Moran KY 711 bride Lickin 0.0 7.8 7.8

Grovers Creek Pendleton Kincaid L. backwaters to iTT Lickin 3.4 0.5 2.9

Bi Sinkin Creek Carter KY 986 bride Little Sand 15.2 10.7 4.5

Arabs Fork Elliott KY 1620 bridge Little Sandy 4.7 0.0 4.7

Big Caney Creek Elliott Grayson L, backwaters to headwaters Little Sandy 14.9 0.0 14.9

Big Sinking Creek Carter, Elliott SR 986 to Clay and Arab forks Little Sandy 15.2 10.7 4.5

Laurel Creek Elliott Carter School Rd Bridge Little Sandy 14.4 7.6 6.8

42

Table 3.1.4-1 (cont.). Reference reach streams in Kentucky with those in bold to emphasize those instreams u er Cumberland - 4-Rivers and Green - Tradewater BMiJs


Se mentEnd

Se entTotalMiles

Meadow Branch Elliott Mouth to headwaters Little Sandy 1.4 0.0 1.4Middle Fork Little Sandy R. Elliott Mouth to Sheepskin Branch Little Sandy 3.6 0.0 3.6Nichols Creek Elliott Green Branch to headwaters Little Sandy 1.9 0.0 1.9Jackson Creek Graves Basin Mississippi 2.6 0.0 2.6Obion Creek Hickman Hurricane Creek to Little Creek Mississippi 35.5 25.2 103Big Sugar Creek Gallatin I-71 to headwaters Ohio 3.6 1.0 3.6Corn Creek, UT Trimble Mouth to headwaters Ohio 2.0 0.0 2.0Crooked Creek Crittenden Rush Creek to City Lske Dam Ohio 25.6 17.5 S.1Double Lick Creek Boone Mouth to land use change Ohio 1.4 0.0 1.4Garrison Creek Boone Mouth to headwaters Ohio 4.1 0.0 4.1Kinniconick Creek Lewis McDowell Creek to headwaters Ohio 50.4 5.1 45.3Massac Creek McCracken Mouth to headwaters Ohio 1.7 0.0 1.7Middle Fork Massac Creek McCracken Hines Road to headwaters Ohio 6.2 3.15 3.05Second Creek Boone Private road crossing to

headwatersOhio 2.9 0.5 2.4

W. Fork Massac Creek McCracken River mile 5.4 to river mile 3.2 Ohio 5.4 3.2 2.2Yellowbank Creek Breckenridge Ohio River backwaters to

headwatersOhio 11.4 1.4 10.0

Yellowbank Creek Breckenridge Cart-Manning Crossing RdWildlife Mana ement Area

Ohio 11.9 4.4 7.5

Grindstone Creek Calloway Mouth to headwaters Tennessee 2.3 0.0 2.3Soldier Creek Marshall HWY 58 bridge Tennessee 5.3 2.6 2.7Panther Creek Callowa KY Z80 bride Tennessee 6.0 0.0 6.0Panther Creek, UT Graves Mouth to headwaters Tennessee 2.1 0.0 2.1Soldier Creek Marshall Mouth to South Fork Soldier Cr. Tennessee 5.3 0.0 5.3Trace Creek Graves Mouth to Keel Branch Tennessee 3.0 0.0 3.0W. Fork Clarks River Graves/

MarshallSoldier Creek to Duncan Creek Tennessee 22.7 19.7 3.0

Wildcat Creek Calloway Ralph Wright Road crossing toheadwaters

Tennessee 6.7 3.5 3.2

Blood River Calloway Grubbs Lane bridge; 0.75 mi E ofState Line Rd

Tennessee 15.65 12.2 3.45

East Fork FI nn Fork Caldwell Land use chan e to headwaters Tradewater 4.6 2.5 2.1Piney Creek Caldwell L. Beshear backwaters to

headwatersTradewater 10.2 4.5 5.7

Pine Creek, UT Caldwell Mouth to headwaters Tradewater 0.0 2.9 2.9Tradewater River Christian,

Ho kinsDripping Springs Br to BuntenLake dam

Tradewater 131.1 123.2 7.9

Sandlick Creek Christian Camp Creek to headwaters Tradewater 9.0 4.9 4.1

Sandlick Creek, UT Christian Mouth to headwaters Tradewater 1.4 0.0 1.4

Cedar Creek Bullitt Mouth to Greens Branch Salt 5.1 0.0 5.1Cha lin River Washin on Thom son Creek to Comishville Salt 53.7 40.1 13.6Harts Run Bullitt Mouth to headwaters Salt 2.3 0.0 23Wilson Creek Bullitt Mt. Carmel Church Rd, first crossin Salt 17 12.2 4.8Salt Lick Creek Marion Mouth to headwaters Salt 8.4 0.0 8.4Sulphur Creek Anderson Mouth to Cheese Lick and Brush Cr Salt 9.7 0.0 9.7Otter Creek Larue 0.1 mi below West Fork, Herbert-

Howell RdSalt 2.7 1.7 1.0

Overalls Creek Bullitt Mouth to headwaters Salt 13 0.0 1.3West Fork Otter Creek Larue Mouth to headwaters Salt 4.7 0.0 4.7

.~j

Wilson Creek Bu(litt, Nelson Mouth to headwaters Salt 17.0 0.0 17.0Table 3.1.4-1 (cont.). Reference reach streams in Kentucky with those in bold to emphasize those in

streams u er Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater BMLJsStart End Total

Stream Coun Location Basin Se ent Se ent MilesCrooked Creek Trigg Lake Barkley backwaters to Lower 9.4 4.0 5.4

headwaters CumberlandDonaldson Creek Trigg Craig BrAnch to UT Lower 103 6.9 3.4

CumberlandElk Fork Todd Kentucky —Kentucky stateline to Lower 9.8 7.5 2.3

D Branch CumberlandSugar Creek Livingston Lick Creek to UT Lower 6.7 2.1 4.6

CumberlandWest Fork Red River Christian Carter Rd bridge Lower 26.5 163 10.2

CumberlandWhippoorwill Creek Logan Mouth to Vicks Branch Lower 13.0 0.0 13.0

CumberlandaCandidate stream or segment included in the 2008 triennial review package

Watershed Biological Monitoring Program (WBMP). The WBMP monitored

streams in a (fixed-station network so long-term trends can be tracked in targeted fourth

and fifth order watersheds (Figures 3.1.1-2; 3.1.1-3; and 3.1.1-4). Targeted stations were

placed in the downstream reaches of fourth, fifth and occasionally sixth order (on

1:24,000 scale USGS topographic maps) watersheds. One reason for this choice was that

the number of these watersheds closely matched the available monitoring resources.

Another favorable attribute of this design was that these watersheds were more

hydrologically accurate and uniform in size than 11-digit watersheds. A biosurvey was

conducted at these stations which typically include two or three biological communities

(macroinvertebrates, fishes, or diatoms) to determine the condition of wadeable streams.

Also collected are nutrient samples (unionized ammonia, nitrite-nitrate, total phosphorus,

and total Kjeldahl-nitrogen) in addition to bulk water quality variables (total suspended

solids, chlorides, sulfates, alkalinity, hardness and total

organic carbon). Physical measurements were also made at time of water quality sample

collection; a multiparameter probe is used to measure pH, temperature, DO, percent DO

saturation and specific conductance. Often, ambient water quality data were collected at

these locations on a monthly basis during the BMU-cycle. These stations are revisited

every five yeazs.

44

Tabl

e 3.1.4-2. Can

dida

te ref

eren

ce reach and exceptional streams and seQmentG;,,

the KP„t„~k~ a~

r~ef

inr~

r~ ;,,

ani

uaR s•n

zn

u,

Basi

nStream

Segment De

scri

ptio

nSegment

Total

Lat-

Long

Lat-

Long

~

Couny

4 ✓

References

or

u stream

Exce t

ionalb

Mil

e Points

Miles

(dow

nstr

eam

-X

Kentucky

Rock Lick Cr

.Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-9.6

9.6

37.53939

- 84.

0104

137

.547

62- 83.

1503

8Ja

ckso

nRe

fere

nce

Lower Howazd Cr.

Mouth to West Fork

0.0-2.7

2,~

37.9

1802

37.93369

Clark

Exceptional

- 84.

2725

6-8

4.26

951

Bac

kbon

e Cr

.Mouth to Scrabble Cr.

0.0-1.7

1.7

38.33978

3832024

Franklin,

Reference

-84.

9968

8-8

4.99

354

He , Sh

elb

iSu

lphu

r Creek

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-5.2

5.2

38.2

8752

38.30562

Franklin

Reference

- 84.

8023

8-84.74529

Cra

ig Cre

ekMouth to UT

0.0-2.7

2.~

37.97908

37.98133

Woodford

Reference

-84.

8206

-84.

7847

3

Bea

r Branch

Above Sediment Pond to

0.3-1.2

0.9

37.1

3216

37.1

2607

perry

Exceptional

Hea

dwat

ers

-83.10139

-83.

1133

2

Billey Fork

Land Use Change to

2'6-

g'g

62

37.6

796

37.7254

Lee

Exceptional

Hea

dwat

ers

-83.7965

-83.

7250

Che

rry Run

Mouth to Boyd Run

0.0-

0.9

0.9

38.2

1315

38.21726

Scott

Exceptional

-84.48522

-84.

4743

1

Gil

bert

s Creek

Mouth to UT

0.0-2.6

2.6

37.97366

37.97570

Anderson

Exceprional

-84.81863

-84.

8523

1

Honey Bra

nch

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-1.4

1.4

37.01756

37.00966

Leslie

Exceprional

-83.

3549

9-83.37233

Kat

ies Cr

eek

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-4.0

4.0

37.0349

37.0

177

Clay

Exceptional

-83.5399

-83.

5964

Little Mi

ddle

Fk.

Mouth Headwaters

0.0-0.75

0.75

37.08173

37.08750

Leslie

Exceptional

Elisha Cr

eek

-8351566

-83.50586

*Mi

ddle

Fk.

Hurt

s Cr

eek to Greasy

75.9-843

9.4

37.1

5529

37.07655

Leslie

Exceptional

Ken

tuc

Rive

rCr

eek

_g3.3704

-8339242

Rig

ht Fk. Elisha Cr

.Mouth to Headwatrs

0.0-3.3

3.3

37.0

8165

-83.

5180

237

.076

01-83.46882

Leslie

Exceptional

Sha

ker Cr

eek

Near Mouth to Shawnee

0.1-1.4

1.3

37.84727

37.8

4374

Merc

erExceptional

Run

_g4.

7656

3-8

4.76

813

*Spruce Bra

nch

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-1.0

1.0

36.95706

-83.

5310

036.94948

-83.

5166

6Clay

Exceprional

Tabl

e 3.

1.4-

2 (co

nt.)

. Candidate reference reach an

d exceptional streams an

d se

gmen

ts in Ke

nt,~

ckv ac

r~efnP~ ;,,

4n~ xAu 5•n~n

rn

Basi

nStream

Segment De

scri

ptio

nSe

ent

Tota

lLa

t-Lo

neLa

t-Lo

ngCo

un ~References oar

Mile P

oints

Miles

(dow

nstr

eam

u stream

Exce

tional

Ken

tuc

Cont

.

Steeles Run

Mouth to UT

0.0-

4.2

4.2

38.1

1101

38.0

6734

Fayette

Exceptional

- 84.62885

-84.59552

UT of Ja

cks Cr

eek

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-1.15

1.15

37.85200

37.8

5177

Madison

Exceptional

-84.36529

-84.

3460

7

UT of Ken

tuck

y R.

Near Mouth to Land Use

0.1-1.4

1.3

38.2

1910

238

.231

74Franklin

Exceptional

Chan e

-84.

8777

7-84.8624

Bil

ly Fork

Land use

change to

2'6-

g'8

6'2

37.6

796

37.7254

Lee, Es

till

Exceptional

Headwaters

-83.7965

-83.7965

Bill Oak Bra

nch

Mouth to He

adwa

ters

0.0

0.6

37.3

3551

37.33128

Scott

Exceptional

- 83.5671

-83.

5552

3

Dee

p Fo

rd Bra

nch

Above Pond to He

adwa

ters

0.3-1.3

1.0

37.19057

37.17650

Leslie

Exceptional

-8334776

-83.

3485

6

Lau

rel Fork

Cortland Fork to Big

2,1-

3.8

1.7

37.34753

3732790

Owsl

eyExceptional

Branch

-83.

5647

7-8

3.56

767

Mikes Bra

nch

Mouth to He

adwa

ters

0.0-0.7

0.7

3733903

3733533

Owsl

eyExceptional

-83.56345

-83.55167

Wat

ches

Fork

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-

0.9

0.9

3734461

3734010

Owsl

eyExceptional

-83.56242

-83.54701

Lic

king

Blanket Cr

eek

Mouth to UT

0.0-

1.9

1.9

38.6

5566

38.64272

Pend

leto

nExceptional

-84.

2853

2-84.29925

Bowman Creek

Mouth to UT

0.0-6.0

6.0

38.89256

38.8

9406

Kent

onExceptional

-84.44239

-84.50250

Cedar Cre

ekMouth to N. Br.

Ced

ar Cr.

0.0-1.7

1.7

38.47647

-84.

1228

838

.490

34-84.

1073

8Robertson

Exceptional

Flow Creek

Mouth to UT

0.0-

2.2

2,2

38.78912

-84.

3440

138.80180

-8432476

Pend

leto

nExceptional

Saw

yers

Fork

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-3.3

33

38.84833

-84.54032

38.82288

.84.

5849

1Ke

nton

Exceptional

*Slabcamp Cre

ekMouth to Headwaters

0.0-3.7

3.7

38.09982

-8332884

.38.13916

-833548

Rowan

Exceprional

Tabl

e 3.

1.4-

2 (cont.). Candidate re

fere

nce reach and exceptional streams an

d segrr,e„t~;r, K

Pnr„~k~ a~

~Pf„P~

;,, any

xau ~•nzn

r V

$Reference Reach str

eams

and seg

ment

s have the

gre

ates

t bi

olog

ical

int

egri

ty and intact ha

bita

t of those streams in a given bioregion.

bExceptional streams and segments must sco

re "excellent" on the MBI or KIBI based on 50~' %

tile

for

Mou

ntai

n, Bl

uegr

ass and

Pen

nyro

yal and 75`

~ %t

ile for the Mississippi Valley

-Interior River Lowlands bio

regi

ons.

*St

ream

s that are

already Exc

epti

onal

in

401 KAR 5:0

30 but

are

pro

pose

d fo

r a segment cha

nge ba

sed on new dat

a, or to conform to NHD mile po

ints

.

Bas

inStream

Segment Description

Se

ent

Tota

lLat-Long

Lat-Long

Coun

tRe

fere

nces

or

Exce t

ionalb

Mil

e Po

ints

Miles

downstream

u s

tream

Sla

te Creek

Mouth to Mill Cre

ek0.0-13.6

13.6

38.2

1835

38.11217

Bath

Exceptional

- 83.

6983

8-83.74668

UT of Shannon Cr.

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-2.2

2.2

38.55437

38.52929

Mason

Exceptional

-83.

9333

4-83.94689

Little South Fork

Land Use Change to

1.2-

5.9

4.7

38.82221

38.8

2854

Boone

Exceptional

Hea

dwat

ers

_g4.

7407

2-8

4.68

526

Doc

tors

Fork

Mouth to Be

gley

Bra

nch

0.0-3.8

3.8

37.6

7561

37.64618

Boyle

Exceptional

- 84.968583

-84.99938

Sal

t

Doctors Fork

Mouth to Begley Bra

nch

0.0-3.8

3.8

3.67561

37.64618

Boyl

eExceptional

- 84.

9685

8-84.99938

Indian Creek

Mouth to UT

0.0-

0.9

0.9

37.8

5122

37.8

5371

Mercer

Exceptional

-84.

9789

4-8

4.96

872

Lic

k Creek

Mouth to 0.

1 mi below dam

0.0-4.1

4.1

37.8

1839

37.82618

W~hington

Exceptional

85.

2155

585

.163

98

UT of Gle

ns Cre

ekMouth to Headwaters

0.0-2.3

2.3

37.8

5772

37.8

5101

Washington

Exceptional

-g5.i21gJ

-g5.

~g5g

2Green

Big Br

ush Creek

Bah Creek to Poplar

13.0

-17.

44.4

37.3855

37.42748

Green

Exceptional

Grove Branch

-85.59256

-86.

5793

5

Elk

Lick Br

anch

Duck Lick Creek to Barren

3.6-

11.8

8,2

36.96006

36.91647

Allen

Exceptional

Fork & Ed a

ercreeks

-86.

9883

4-8

6.97

282

Pun

cheo

n Cr

eek

Mouth to KY/TN State Line

0.0-4.3

4.3

36.67659

36.62955

Allen

Exceptional

-86.00208

-86.

0053

4

Thompson Branch

Mouth to KY/TN State Lin

e0.0-1.5

1.5

36.6

6124

36.65203

Simpson

Exceptional

-86.

5006

6-8

6.47

974

Cum

ber-

Left

Fork Fu

gitt

Mouth to Headwaters

0.0-1.5

1.5

36.92528

36.936699

Harlan

Exceptional

land

Creek

_g3.04509

-83.

0248

6

Nonpoint Source Program (NPSP). The Kentucky Nonpoint Source Pollution

Control Program's goal is to protect the quality of Kentucky's surface and groundwater

from NPS pollutants, abate NPS threats and restores degraded waters to the extent that

water quality standazds are met and beneficial uses are supported. The NPSP is

achieving this through federal, state, local and private partnerships which promote

complementary, regulatory and non-regulatory nonpoint source pollution control

initiatives at both statewide and watershed levels.

Nonpoint source pollution is sometimes referred to as runoff or diffuse pollution.

Unlike pollution from industrial and sewage treatment plants, NPS pollution is caused by

rainfall or snowmelt moving over and through the ground. As the runoff moves, it picks

up and carries away natural and human-produced pollutants, finally depositing them into

lakes, rivers, wetlands, coastal waters and even underground sources of drinking water.

These pollutants include:

• Excess fertilizers, herbicides and insecticides from agricultural lands and

residential azeas;

• Oil, grease and toxic chemicals from urban runoff and energy production;

• Sediment from improperly managed construction sites, crop and silviculture lands

and eroding streambanks;

• Acid mine drainage; and

• Bacteria and nutrients form livestock, pet wastes and faulty septic systems.

Ahnospheric deposition and hydromodification are also sources of nonpoint

source pollution. NPS pollution is the number one contributor to water pollution in

Kentucky.

Monitoring of streams impacted by NPS pollutants follows KDOW standard

protocol; each biosurvey conducted at these stations typically included two biological

communities, macroinvertebrates and fishes, to determine the condition of wadeable

streams. Also collected were nutrient samples (un-ionized ammonia, nitrite-nitrate, total

phosphorus, and total Kjeldahl-nitrogen) in addition to bulk water quality variables (total

suspended solids, chlorides, sulfates, alkalinity, hazdness and total organic carbon).

Physical measurements were also made at time of water quality sample collection; a

48

multiparameter probe was used to measure pH, temperature, DO, percent DO saturation

and specific conductance.

Probabilistic Monitoring Program (PMP). KDOW conducts random

biosurveys of streams across the commonwealth. Each yeaz the Probabilistic Biosurvey

Program Coordinator selects watersheds on the 8-digit HLTC level to be monitored in a

particulaz BML1. The target population is all wadeable streams 1St through 5~' order

within the HLTCs of each BMU. Then a request is sent to EPA's National Health and

Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Reseazch and Development, Corvallis,

Oregon, where the EMAP Design Group uses EPA's Reach File Version 3 =Alpha (RF3-

Alpha) as a sampling frame. A frequency table is established for the population

candidate streams (based on stream order) across the HLJCs and based on those

frequencies, a random, weighted survey design is utilized to determine those streams and

locations of the sample point for the study. A sample size of 50 sites with approximately

an equal number in each of the four categories: 1St, 2nd 3ra~ 4~ + 5`~. An oversample of

200% (100 sites) for a total of 150 sites including the base sites are derived per study.

This oversample provides reserve samples for alternative sites when those initial sites do

not conform to target population parameters (e.g. non-wadeable, miss-mapped features),

aze inaccessible due to safety concerns, or to which access is denied by landowners.

Standazd protocol dictates that surrogate stream sample sites be selected sequentially

from the oversample population when replacement of an initial sample site is necessary.

Since the random design is weighted, no regard to replacement of an initial sample site

with one of equivalent Strahler order is required.

A biosurvey of the macroinvertebrate community was conducted to determine

condition of wadeable streams; additionally, the probabilistic program collected nutrient

samples (un-ionized ammonia, nitrite-nitrate, total phosphorus, and total Kjeldahl-

nitrogen) in addition to bulk water quality variables (total suspended solids, chlorides,

sulfates, alkalinity, hazdness and total organic cazbon). Physical measurements were also

made at time of water quality sample collection; a Hydrolab0 multiparameter probe was

used to measure pH, temperature, DO, percent DO saturation and specific conductance.

For this reporting cycle, probabilistic network consisted of 100 sites (50 stations per

BMLJ (upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater). Those sites, along with

49

stream names, may be identified in Tables 3.1.4-3; 3.1.4-4; and 3.1.4-5 and Figures 3.1.4-

1; 3.1.4-2; and 3.1.4-3.

Table 3.1.4-3. Key to stream names sampled and assessed in the upper CumberlandRiver basin using probabilistic methodology.

4. Cane Creek 33. Big Clifty5. Otter Creek 36. Little Poplar Creek6. Poor Fork 37. Little South Fork8. Sugar Camp Creek9; Sulphur Creek14. Little Laurel River17. Ferris Fork Creek20. Bear Creek22. Sinking Creek24. Line Creek26. Cloverlick Creek28. Roundstone Creek30. Bull Run

aUT= Unnamed tributary

40. Buck Creek44. Pond Creek46. aUT Helton Branch49. Salt Lick Creek54. Roaring Fork55. aUT Big Creek58. Bee Lick Creek59. Spring Creek64. Straight Creek

Table 3.1.4-4. Key to stream names sampled and assessed in lower C~unberland,Mississippi, Ohio and Tennessee rivers basins using probabilistic methodology.1. Dry Fork 43. Middle Brar►ch North3. Hurricane Creek Fork Little River7. Rockhouse Creek 47. Livingston Creek

11. aUT Mud Creek 48. Claylick Creek13. Bayou de Chien 51. aUT Whippoorwill Creek15. Sinking Fork 53. Truman Creek18. Little White Creek 61. aTJT Brush Creek19. Little Cypress Creek 76. West Fork Clarks River23. a UT to aUT Tennessee River 79. South Fork Bayou de21. Terrapin Creek Chien29. West Fork Mayfield Creek 81. Cypress Creek31. Dry Fork Creek 82. Claylick Creek39. aUT Clarks River 84. Middle Fork Massac42. Clarks River CreekaUT= Unnamed tributary

50

Figure 3.1.4-1.

Probabilistic biological survey sites in the upper C~imberland Riuer basin (key to stream names on

p revious page).

N

r

Somerset

~ "'~

'~; ~8

~$

~

-

33

~ -

,8~4

i S,

~ ..

1

~!

~

~--~

;:,~.

_ _

'f:7'

!49 °

.. 4~

2754

:Sq,

59

iMiddlesboro

0

10

20

40

60

80 M

iles

., ~

26

6

~'

flAonitoring Site

Srearn C/= 3rd order

Reservoirs

- City

8 Digit HUC Boundary

County Line

Fig~~re 3.1.

4-2.

Probabilistic biological survey sit

es in the lower Cumberland, (Mississippi, Ohio end Tennessee rivers

basin (key to stream names on pre

viou

s page).

N

84 s;

~►

~93

-ak

-

1~- ~~ry

~,~3 ~

;79

~~i

0 5

10

20

30

40M

iles

s2a s

.Pa

duca

h $,

~!~

~~ -

1$ .s

- 3~

#~_

ar, .

_ - _

. . 15

43

~ ~

2

~76

~+~

-

_

~,

-. --

7 f

~3.

_.. .

~9

4

2'1

Mur

ray

! 1 .*

51

i

''

AAon

itorin

g Si

te

Stre

ams

</=

3rcl

ord

er

Res

evoi

rs,~

~

~

8 D

igit

HU

C B

ound

ary

Cou

nty

Line

Table 3.1.4-5. .Key to stream names sampled and assessed in Green - Tradewater BasinManagement Unit using probabilistic methodology.

1. Pond Creek 46. West Bays Fork2. West Fork Drakes Creek 47. Beaverdam Creek4. Dismal Creek 48. Indian Camp Creek6. Dyerhill Creek 49. $[1T to $iJT Slover Creek9. Deer Creek 50. Sadler Creek

1 1. Black Snake Branch ~ 51. South Fork Little Barren14. Laurel Creek River15. Russell Creek 53. Crooked Creek16. gL1T Richland Creek 55. North Fork Nolin River17. Deer Creek 57. aIJT Elk Creek18. Buck Fork Pond River 59. Brush Creek19. Blackford Creek 60. Muddy Creek21. Tradewater River 64. Panther Creek23. East Fork Little Barren River 65. Fredricks Ditch24. Billy Creek ~ 69. Buffalo Creek28. Brushy Pond Creek 71. South Fork Little Barren29. aUT Drakes Creek River30. Middle Fork Drakes Creek 72. Wright Bell Ditch31. Sulphur Creek 75. Big Brush Creek32. UT Gasper River 77. West Fork Pond River37. West Fork Donaldson Creek 78. Middle Fork Drakes39. Falling Timber Creek Creek40. Barnett Creek 84. Meeting Creek41. North Fork Panther Creek 87. Eaton Branch43. Robinson Creek 88. Muddy Creek44. Wolf Lick Creek 91. Tallow Creek45. aUT Cwress CreekaUT= Unnamed tributary

53

Figure 3.7.4-3.

Prob

abil

isti

c biological survey sites in the Green - Tra

dewa

ter ~3asin ~ll

a~ag

erra

ent Unit (key tQ

stream n~me~ on ~revio~is gage}.

N

v,

Owensboro

~

~~--

1~~~~

~~

'~

' 1

I /

':'

~~x'

:.

~.

Eliz~beti~iown

,~

` —/ s`6

1~.

4~~5

~'~ ' ~~f"

..

~~

S

~~~ ~~,

~._

~ ~;r

,

.~

Bow

ling

Gre

en

0 5'10

20

30

40 M

iles

~;~_ ~:

~~

97

i ~

''r

r"~

l~~~~~^ ",

~ Li

bert

y

Mon

itor

ing Si

te

-- Streams </=

3rd

ord

er

Res

evoi

rs

~ Ci

ty

8 Digit HUC Boundary

Cou

nter

Line

3.1.5 Lake and Reservoir Monitoring

Lakes and reservoirs are monitored over the growing season (April —October) for

determination of trophic state using the Cazlson Trophic State Index (TSI) for chlorophyll

a. This method of determining trophic state of lakes is convenient as it allows lakes to be

ranked numerically according to increasing trophic state (oligotrophic, mesotrophic,

eutrophic, and hyper-eutrophic). The growing season average TSI value is used to rank

each lake.

Water quality and physical measurements were made in spring, summer and fall,

typically with an interval of six to eight weeks to allow sufficient time for seasonal

changes to occur. All publicly accessible lakes and reservoirs made-up the population of

these resources monitored in Kentucky. Water quality variables, including nutrients (un-

ionized ammonia, nitrite-nitrate, total phosphorus, TKN, total soluble phosphorus,

soluble reactive orthophosphate and total organic carbon), chlorophyll a, standard

variables (tota.l suspended solids, chlorides, sulfates, alkalinity and hardness) and a

profile of water column physical data (DO, pH, temperature and specific conductance)

were monitored at each station per lake. The majority of these waters were small, usually

several hundred acres or less in surface area; therefore, one sample station in the forebay

was sufficient to characterize the status of the smaller lakes and reservoirs.

The Louisville and Nashville COE districts cooperated in monitoring their dam

projects in each BMU. Additionally, Kentucky Lake, a Tennessee Valley Authority

(TVA) dam project, was monitored by that agency. T'he water quality pazameters

described above were used to determine the trophic status of each reservoir. Multiple

monitoring stations were placed in these large reservoirs. Often, the major in-flow and

out-flow tributaries of each reservoir were monitored for water quality as well, often

including pathogen indicators for recreation support determinations. These tributary

streams were assessed for aquatic life use support based on physicochemical data.

Those lakes and reservoirs monitored in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and

Green - Tradewater BMiJs are presented in Table 3.1.4-1. Maps of use support

assessment results follow in Assessment Results, Section 3.3.

55

Table 3.

1.5-

1. Lak

es and reservoirs mo

nito

red in

the Upper Cum

berl

and - 4 Riv

ers and Gre

en Tra

dewa

ter Ba

sin Management

Uni

ts durin th

e 2005 an d 200

6, re

s ectivel .

Latitude

Longitude

Lake or Res

ervo

ir Name

Size Ac

res

Basi

n Coun

Ener

Lake

370

Lower Cum

berl

and

TRIGG

36.8

6031

-88.01534

Hematite La

ke90

Lower Cumberland

TRIGG

36.89647

-88.04269

Honker La

ke190

Lower Cum

berl

and

LYON

36.9

0976

-88.

0286

9Lake Barkle

45;600

Lower Cumberland

LYON

37.01799

-88.21527

Lake Bl

e89

Lower Cumberland

CHRISTIAN

36.92294

-87.

4959

2Lake Morris

170

Lower Cumberland

CHRISTIAN

36.92889

-87.

4550

0Arrowhead Lak

e37

Mississi

i River

BALLARD

37.0365

-89.12816

Bur

nt Pond

10

Miss

issi

i River

BALLARD

37.0

4361

-89.11694

Fla

t La

ke38

Miss

issi

ppi River

BALLARD

37.04278

-89.09889

Swan Pond

193

Miss

issi

i River

BALLARD

37.012268

-89.

1177

98Bea

verd

am Lak

e50

Ohio

River

BALLARD

37.1425

-89.05417

Buc

k La

ke19

Ohio

River

BALLARD

37.04028

-89.08917

Fis

h La

ke27

Ohio

River

BALLARD

37.0554

-89.09434

Ha

y Ho

llow

Lak

e20

Ohio

River

BALLARD

37.15167

-89.

0455

3Lon Pond

56

Ohio

River

BALLARD

37.0

2556

-89.

1275

Met

ro o

lis La

ke36

Ohio

River

MC CRACKEN

37.14779

-88.76665

Mitchell La

ke58

Ohio

River

BALLARD

37.15167

-89.

0458

3She

lb La

ke24

Ohio

River

BALLARD

37.18374

-89.03048

Turner La

ke61

Ohio River

BALLARD

37.17278

-89.04166

Kentuck Lake

48,1

00Tennessee River

GALLOWAY

37.0

0326

-88.26727

Cannon Creek La

ke243

U

er Cumberland

BELL

36.6

8083

-83.

7022

2

Chenoa La

ke37

Upper Cumberland

BELL

36.6

7583

-83.81944

Corbin Ci

Reservoir

139

U

er Cumberland

LAUREL

36.970241

-84.120201

Cranks Creek Lake

219

U

er Cumberland

HARLAN

36.73907

-83.23758

Dal

e Ho

llow

Reservoir

4300

U

er Cumberland

CLINTON

36.53709

-85.44618

Lake Cumberland

50,250

U

er Cumberland

RUSSELL

36.86607

-85.

1451

v

Table 3.

1.5-

1 (cont.). Lakes and reservoirs mo

nito

red in the Upp

er Cumberland - 4-R

iver

s and Gr

een-

Trad

ewat

er Basin

Mana eme

nt Uni

ts during th

e 20

05 and 200

6, re

s ectivel .

Lati

tude

Lon i

tude

Lak

e or Res

ervo

ir Name

Size (A

cres

Ba

sin

Coon

Lak

e Linville

273

U

er Cumberland

ROCKCASTLE

37.38889

-8434444

Laurel Creek La

ke88

Upper Cumberland

MC CREAKY

36.69293

-84.44283

Lau

rel Ri

ver Reservoir

6060

U

er Cumberland

WHITLEY

36.9

6151

-84.

2649

2M

artin's F

ork Reservoir

334

U p

er Cum

berl

and

HARLAN

36.7

5-8

3.26

111

T

er Lak

e87

U

er Cum

berl

and

JACKSON

3737889

-83.91306

Woo

d Creek Lake

672

Up e

r Cu

mber

land

LAUREL

37.2

1367

-84.19813

Barren Ri

ver Re

serv

oir

10,000

Gree

n River

ALLEN

36.89233

-86.12259

Brigg

s La

ke19

Green Ri

ver

LOGAN

36.8

8812

-86.83244

Cam b

ells

vill

e Ci

Reservoir

63

Gree

n River

TAYLOR

37.3

5649

-85.34198

Cane

ille

Ci

Reservoir

75

Gree

n River

GRAYSON

37.4

3921

-86.

4640

2Freeman Lak

e16

0Gr

een River

HARDIN

37.7

1644

-85.86987

Gra

evine Lake

50

Green River

HOPKINS

37.3

0552

-87.47700

Gre

en River Reservoir

8210

Green River

TAYLOR

37.2

5074

-85.

3375

7Lak

e Luzerne

55

Green River

MLTHLENBERG

37.21278

-87.

1961

1Lak

e Ma

lone

826

Green Ri

ver

LOGAN

37.0

8019

-87.03289

Lak

e Washburn

26

Gree

n Ri

ver

OHIO

37.5

1812

-86.

8484

2Lewisbur

Lake

51Green River

LOGAN

36.9

7056

-86.

9266

7Libe

Lake

79

Green River

CASEY

37.3

2237

-84.89506

Met

calf

e Coun Lake

22

Gree

n River

METCALFE

37.0

4329

-85.60969

Mil

l Creek Lake (Monroe Coun

109

Green River

MONROE

36.6

8201

-85.70103

Nol

in Riv

er Reservoir

5790

Gree

n River

GRAYSON

37.2

7914

-86.24699

Nortonville Lak

e27.4

Green River

HOPKINS

37.18085

-87.46592

Rou h River Res

ervo

ir5100

Green River

HARDIN

37.61833

-86.

4997

2

Sal

em Lake

99

Gree

n Ri

ver

LARUE

37.59129

-85.71097

Shan

Holl

ow Lake

135

Gree

n River

WARREN

37.1

552

-86.38988

Table 3.

1.5-

1 (c

ont.

).Lakes and res

ervo

irs mo

nito

red in

the

Upp

er Cum

berl

and - 4-R

iver

s and Gre

en-T

rade

wate

r Basin

Management Units during the

2005 and 2006, re

spec

tive

ly.

Lake or Reservoir Name

Size Ac

res

Basin

County

Lati

tude

~dd,~

Loni

g fade

~ ddl

Spa Lak

e240

Gree

n River

Logan

36.8

9571

-86.

9499

3Spurlington Lak

e36

Gree

n River

Taylor

37.38519

-85.25506

Wes

t Fo

rk of Drakes Creek Reservoir

67

Gree

n Ri

ver

Simpson

36.72222

-86.

5525

Car

pent

er Lake

64

Ohio River

Davi

ess

37.84587

-86.

9781

Kin

gfis

her Lake

30

Ohio

River

Davi

ess

37.84317

-86.97757

Lake Ge

orge

53

Ohio

River

Crit

tend

en37.31034

-88.

0911

5M

arion Ci

ty Lak

e38

.5Ohio River

Crit

tend

en37.31084

-88.09121

Mau

zy Lake

84

Ohio

River

Union

37.6

2245

-87.85535

Scenic La

ke18

Ohio

River

Henderson

37.87806

-87.

5622

2Lake Beshear

760

Trad

ewat

er

Caldwell

37.14776

-87.

6823

4Lake Peewee

360

Trad

ewat

erHo

pkin

s37

.350

11-87.52718

Loch Mary

135

Trad

ewat

erHo

pkin

s37

.273

43-87.52087

o

Moffat Lak

e49

Trad

ewat

erUnion

37.5

7853

-87.

8548

1Pennyrile Lake

47

Trad

ewat

erCh

rist

ian

37.0

7242

-87.66499

Pro

vide

nce City Reservoir

36

Trad

ewat

erWe

bste

r37

.375

83-87.79639

3,2 Assessment Methodology

General Assessment Methods. Beginning with the 2005 electronic 305(b) report

submittal, the commonwealth began assigning assessed uses, and any associated

nonassessed uses, of stream segments and lakes to the appropriate category of the five

reporting categories recommended by EPA (2005). Of those categories, two categories

were divided to better define assessment results; categories 2B and SB were added by

KDOW to better track assessed segments. Those categories used by the commonwealth

are listed in Table 3.2-1. Many waterbody segments had monitored data for only one use

assessment, typically aquatic life use.

Table 3.2-1. Reporting categories assigned to surface waters during the assessmentrocess.

Cate o Definition1 All desi ated uses for water bod fully su ortin .2 Assessed designated uses) is/aze fully supporting, but not all designated uses

assessed.2B Seginent currently supporting use(s), but 303(d) listed &awaiting EPA

a roved delistin , or a roved established TMDL.3 Designated uses) has/have not been assessed (insufficient or no data

available).4A Segment with an EPA approved or established TMDL for all listed uses not

attainin full su ort.4B Nonsupport segment with an approved alternative pollution control plan (e.g.

BMP) stringent enough to meet full support level of all uses within as ecified time.

4C Segment is not meeting full support of assessed use(s), but this is notattributable to a ollutant or combination of ollutants.

5 TMDL is re uired.SB Segment is not supporting use based on evaluated data; does not require a

TMDL.

When considering waters for assessment, KDOW solicited data from a variety of

entities. This included other government agencies, including state agencies (e.g.

Department of Fish &Wildlife) and federal agencies such as COE, F&WS, USGS, and

TVA. Also, data from universities and ORSANCO were considered.

Generally, data. older than five years were not considered for assessment;

however, assessment decisions were made on a case-by-case basis—not all data older

59

than five years were excluded from consideration. Data older than five yeazs were

considered if they were the only data available for a waterbody.

A number of causes (pollutants) in EPA's 2006 IR guidance were considered

pollution rather than pollutants. A waterbody found not supporting a use and shown to be

impaired by pollution, without ident~ed pollutants, does not require a TMDL, rather an

alternative plan to bring the use back to full support (Category 4B). Causes considered

pollution aze found in Table 3.2-2. The rationale behind pollutant vs. pollution is that a

pollutant is a measurable variable, and its presence above criteria results in designated

use impairment. It is the causal variable, not the indicator or response variable of one or

more pollutants (sedimentation/siltation, total phosphorus, anunonia, methylmercury,

etc). An example of pollution is alteration in stream-side or littoral vegetative cover, a

category that in and of itself may not directly attribute to impairment or water quality

degradation. The loss of this vegetative integrity can result in excess nutrients and

sedimentation/siltation (pollutants) that will subsequently affect biological communities,

water quality, in-stream habitat and temperature. The previous example also serves to

clarify why "habitat assessment (streams)" is also considered pollution. Pollutants such

as sedimentation/siltation, nutrients, or water temperature are listed with those

nonsupporting segments, directly identifying the pollutants) and associated pollution that

should be addressed to restore full use support.

The cause "habitat assessment (streams)" was the most commonly reported

pollution for streams not supporting aquatic life use based on biological community

results. It should be noted that streams with this identified pollution make their way on

the 303(d) list since it is almost never without associated pollutants such as

sedimentation siltation because riparian vegetation to abates excess sedimentation,

removes excess nutrients and ameliorates water temperature. In the uncommon

circumstance where "habitat assessment (streams)" was the only reported "cause," it was

recognized that pollutants had not been observed or measured that were impacting the

biological community(s). In these instances the cause, "impairment unknown," was

listed, which as apollutant-surrogate, places it on the 303(d) list. In these instances more

intensive investigation is needed to determine individual pollutants than the uutial

.~

Table 3.2-2. List of those causes considered pollution by the KDOW (ADB numericalcodes listed).

(67) Abnormal fish histology (lesions)(84) Alteration in stream-side or littoral vegetative covers(85) Alterations in wetland habitats(105) Benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment (streams)(150) Chlorophyll a(161) Combination benthic/fishes bioassessments (streams)(162) Combined biota/habitat bioassessments (streams)(181) Debris/floatable/trash(205) Dissolved oxygen saturation(218) Eurasian water milfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum(227) Excess algal growth(228) Fish-passage barrier(229) Fish kills(230) Fishes bioassessment (streams)(243) Habitat assessment (streams)(266) Lake bioassessment(270) Low flow alterations(312) Non-native aquatic plants(313) Non-native fish, shellfish, or zooplankton(316) Odor threshold number(319) Other flow regime alterations(331) Particle distribution (embeddedness)(336) Periphyton (Aufwuchs) indicator bioassessments (stream)(368) Secchi disk transparency(387) Suspended algae(402) Total organic cazbon(412) Trophic State Index(422) Dreissena polymorpha, zebra mussel(445) Abnormal fish deformities, erosions, lesions, tumors(446) Habitat assessment (lakes/reservoirs)(450) High flow regime(459) Taste and odor(460) Aquatic plants (native)(465) Fish advisory (no restriction)(466) Sediment screening value exceedence(471) Bottom deposits(477) Bacterial slimes(478) Aquatic plants (macrophytes)(479) Aquatic algae

61

biosurvey provided. In this example the waterbody or segment will be assigned to

category 5 (303 [d] list) with the cause, habitat assessment (streams), included in the list

of impairments. It is recognized that to restore aquatic life use, pollution (e.g. riparian

vegetative zone) must be rectified as part of the process in addressing the pollutant(s), in

this example sedimentation/siltation.

Another group of causes considered pollution that may be recognized in stream

biosurveys aze those indicating non-native aquatic plants, non-native fish, shellfish, or

zooplankton, for example zebra mussel, Dreisenna polymorpha. While these conditions

aze undesirable and can have a negative impact on the native plant or animal communities

in a waterbody, non-natives, almost without exception, have been introduced accidentally

or intentionally via commerce or recreation (ship ballasts, boating, aquarists,

sportspersons [non-native trout], etc.). To develop and implement a TMDL to eliminate

these non-natives would often be more damaging to the environment (e.g. biocides or

mechanical removal) then leaving them in-place because they aze often widespread and

prevalent. For example, if the non-native carp, Cyprinus carpio, found in many perennial

streams and reservoirs in the state, was considered a pollutant rather than pollution, a

TMDL would be required to address this in thousands of stream miles and reservoir

acres. These examples are instances where the occurrence of impairments considered

pollution (non-natives) alone will not result in a category 5 listing, rather a category 2

listing if all biological community metrics indicate the aquatic life use is supporting.

Causes that may be indicators of nonsupport aquatic life use but are not pollutants

themselves: 1) benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment (streams); 2) chlorophyll a; 3)

combination benthic/fishes bioassessment; 4) combined biota/habitat bioassessments

(streams); 5) dissolved oxygen saturation; 6) excess algal growth; 7) fishes bioassessment

(streams); 8) lake bioassessment; 9) periphyton (aufwuchs) indicator bioassessments

(stream); 10) Secchi disk transparency; 11) suspended algae; 12) trophic state index; and

13) fish advisory — no restriction, are considered pollution. The KDOW uses

macroinvertebrates and fishes routinely to make aquatic life use support determinations

in streams. These biological indicators provided the data necessary to produce KDOW's

multimetric indices through correlation with stressors resulting in the assignment of

tolerance levels based on taxon, percent dominance of tolerant taxa, percent intolerant

62

taxa, such as Ephemeroptera (mayflies), feeding strategy (e.g. filterers or scrapers), as

well as watershed drainage azea which naturally influences the populations within each

community. While these biological communities are robust environmental indicators of

water quality and integrity of habitat, they are not pollutants, but a manifestation of those

tolerant organisms exploiting conditions that will not support clean-water, intolerant

populations. Through physicochemical data taken at time of biosurveys and habitat

assessment (in-stream habitat and land use observations), the most detrimental pollutants

aze usually recognized as contributors to the degraded biological community. Most

stream miles in Kentucky not supporting aquatic life use were impaired primarily by the

pollutants sedimentation siltation (habitat smothering), nutrient enrichment, and "cause

unknown," in addition to pollution in the form of habitat alterations (often riparian zone

related). All these pollutants affect in-stream habitat or physicochemical variables that

manifest in the biological community structure. In cases where no pollutants were

recognized, "cause unknown" is listed, which places the waterbody/segment in category

5, requiring a TMDL.

The total number of assessed stream miles was determined by adding the miles

represented by the site-specific random survey (not extrapolated data) and the miles

assessed by targeted monitoring. In other words, miles assessed by targeted monitoring

in wadeable streams were included in miles assessed by the random survey (1St — 5~'

Strahler order). However, results were also presented separately for targeted and random

(extrapolated) total miles.

3.2.1 Aquatic Life Use

The water quality and biological data provided by the programs described in the

preceding sections were used to assess use support in rivers and streams. Table 3.2.1-1

shows the designated uses of Kentucky waters and the indicators employed to make those

use support determinations. Given the comprehensive suite of pazameters sampled by

KDOW for many stream assessments, both biological and physicochemical, a

determination can typically be made as to the causes) and sources) of pollutant or

pollution affecting the resource. Further study during TNIDL development will lead to

specific definition of causes and sources. Data were categorized as "monitored" or

63

"evaluated." Monitored data were derived from site-specific surveys and generally no

more than five years old. Typically, data older than five years were considered

"evaluated," but this did not change the assessment category a waterbody and/or segment

had been assigned unless there were more recent "monitored" data. In some instances

where conditions were believed to have remained mostly unchanged, monitored data

collected prior to 1995 were still considered valid, and waters described by these data

were categorized as monitored. Additionally, data from the random survey network were

used. Like the targeted stations, each random survey station was used to assess a limited

reach of stream around the sample point. Few evaluated waters remain in the assessment

database. Although all efforts in the watershed initiative were to gather defensible,

monitored data, there were some monitoring data more than five years old, strong

anecdotal information, and extrapolation of dischazge data that resulted in evaluated

assessments.

Water Quality Data. Chemical data collected by KDOW and others were

assessed according to EPA guidance (U.S. EPA 1997). Water quality data were

compazed to criteria contained in Kentucky Water Quality Regulations (401 KAR 5:031).

The segment fully supported WAH use when criteria for dissolved oxygen, un-ionized

ammonia, temperature and pH were not met in 10 percent or less of the samples

collected. Impaired, partial support was indicated if any one criterion for these

parameters was not met in 11-25 percent of the samples. A segment was impaired, not

supporting, if any one of these criteria was not met in more than 25 percent of the samples.

Data for mercury, cadmium, copper, iron, lead and zinc were analyzed for

exceedences of acute criteria listed in state water quality standards regulations using at

least three years of data. The segment fully supported WAH use if all criteria were met at

stations with quarterly or less frequent sampling, or if only one exceedence occurred at

stations with monthly sampling. Impaired, partial support was indicated if any one

criterion was not met more than once but in less than 10 percent of the samples. The

segment was impaired, not supporting if criteria were exceeded in greater than 10 percent of

the samples. The assessment criteria were closely linked to the way state and federal water

quality criteria were developed. Aquatic life was considered protected if, on average, the

.~

Table 3.2.1-1. Designated uses in Kentucky waters and the indicators used to assess levelof support.

Use A uatic Life Recreation Fish Consum tion `Drinkin WaterCore Stream: Stream: ercury Inorganic chemicalsIndicators 1-3 biological communities:Pathogen indicators: PCBs Organic chemicals

macroinvertebrates, diatomsfecal coliform; E. coli Pathogen indicators:and fishes H fecal coliform, E. colaDissolved oxygenTemperature Lakes/Reservoir:pH Pathogen indicators:Specific conductance fecal coliform or B. coli

HLake/Reservoir:

Dissolved oxygen

Temperature

pH

Specific conductanceFish kills

SuplementalChlorophyll-a uisance macrophytes Other chemicals ofOdorIndicators Trophic State Index (TSI) uisance macroscopic algal growthconcern found Taste

Secchi depth uisance algal blooms in water quality Treatment problemsIndicator health (vigor) Suspended sediment standards caused by poor waterChemical Chemical qualitySediments

"All core indicators aze based on "at the tap" MORs received from PWS

acute criteria were not exceeded more than once every three years. Data were also

compared to chronic criteria. Observations that equaled or were only slightly greater than

chronic criteria were not considered to exceed water quality standards. Toxic criteria

were assessed based on 12 monthly samples at the rotating watershed ambient water

quality network and generally 36 samples from the primary ambient water quality

network. The segment fully supported WAH use if all criteria met or exceeded only

once. Impaired, partial support was assessed if any criterion was not met more than once,

but in less than 10 percent of samples. The segment was impaired, not supporting if

criteria were exceeded in greater than 10 percent of samples.

Biological Data (streams). Decisions about use attainment for aquatic life were

primarily made using biological data obtained from'monitoring programs within the

KDOW and other agencies. There aze a number of reasons biological data are so

important in making level of support decisions for aquatic life use. Biological

65

communities (indicators) integrate their environment and thus serve as good indicators of

the conditions (physical, chemical, and habitat) they live in. The core indicators for

bioassessment aze outlined in Table 3.2.1-2. Level of use support was dependent on the

indicator community(s) health and integrity, with supplemental physicochemical and

habitat data. These results were applied for assessment purposes as outlined in Table

3.2.1-2.

Macroinvertebrates have been used extensively in water quality monitoring and

impact assessment since the early 1900s. Today, macroinvertebrates aze used throughout

the world in water quality assessment as environmental indicators of biological integrity,

to describe water quality conditions or health of the aquatic ecosystem, and to identify

causes (pollutants) of impairment. This indicator community is relatively sedentary,

spending a significant portion of their life cycle in the aquatic environment. Various

populations of a community aze dependent on multiple habitats in the water column,

occupy more than one consumer level throughout the food web (herbivores, omnivores,

and carnivores) and, significantly, many sensitive taxa (benthos) live in or on the

sediments of streams. These characteristics and habits make this a key indicator group of

their environment. KDOW defines benthic macroinvertebrates as organisms large

enough to be seen by the unaided eye, can be retained by a U.S. Standard Number 30

sieve (28 mesh inch, 600 µm openings), and live at least part of their life cycle within or

upon available substrates of a waterbody. In addition to determining use support level,

biomonitoring will identify those Exceptional Waters (401 KAR 5:030) (those waters that

are among the most biologically diverse and represent biological integrity to a high

degree in a given bioregion) occurring across the commonwealth.

The evaluation of fish community structure is an important component of

biological monitoring providing reliable assessments for the CWA, Section 305(b). The

Kentucky Index of Biotic Integrity (KIBI) was developed based on reference conditions

and tolerances and community feeding structure of species present. Advantages of using

fish as biological indicators include their widespread distribution, utilization of a variety

of trophic levels, stable populations during summer months, and the availability of

extensive life history information (Karr et al. 1986).

..

Table 3.2.1-2. Biological criteria for assessment of wane water aquatic habitat (streams) usesupport$.

Indicator Fully Supporting Partial Support Nonsupport

Algae Diatom Bioassessment DBI classification of DBI classificationIndex (DBI) fair; increased biomass of poor; biomassClassification of (if nutrient enriched) of very lowexcellent or good; filamentous green (toxicity), or highbiomass similar to algae. (organicreference%ontrol or enrichment).STOREY mean.

Macroinvertebrates Macroinvertebrate MBI classification of MBI classificationBioassessment Index fair, EPT lower than of poor; EPT low,(MBI) excellent or good, expected in relation to TNI of toleranthigh EPT, sensitive available habitat, tax$ very high.species present. reduction in RA of Most functional

sensitive tax$. Some groups missingalterations of functional from community.groups evident.

Fishes Index of Biotic Integrity IBI fair. IBI poor, very(IBI) excellent or good; poor, or no fish.presence of raze,endangered or species ofspecial concern.

aAcronyms used in this table: EPT= Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera; RA=relative abundance; TNI- total number of individuals

Algal (primarily diatoms) communities are important water quality indicators,

particularly as it relates to trophic status (nutrient or organic enrichment) and toxicity

conditions. This indicator group is critical to the food web of streams, beginning the

process of primary production through photosynthesis. The Diatom Bioassessment Index

(DBI) is used to assess this indicator community.

Federally Threatened and Endangered Species. Waters with federally

threatened or endangered species in November 1975 have an existing "use" of

Outstanding State Resource Water, and the loss or significant decline of one of these

populations constitutes an impairment of use.

Lakes and Reservoirs. Lakes and reservoirs were assessed for aquatic life by

measuring several physicochemical indicators and reported fish kills. The lack of a direct

biological indicator is primarily due to most of this resource being manmade, thus

supporting altered and unnatural biological communities that aze composed almost

exclusively of tolerant species (e.g. Tubificidae, Chironomus spp., Chaoborus spp.,

Glyptotendipes spp., etc.) that aze capable of exploiting this naturally low DO-stressed

environment. Thus, the core and supplemental indicators shown in Table 3.2.1-1 are of

utmost importance to assure water quality conditions are suitable for supporting sportfish

and associated prey fishes. Populations of these fishes are the primary concern for

aquatic life use being met in these created environments. Table 3.2.1-3 outlines those

criteria used in making use assessment decisions.

Trophic state was assessed in lakes and reservoirs using the Cazlson Trophic State

Index (TSn for chlorophyll-a. This method is convenient because it allows lakes and

reservoirs to be ranked numerically according to increasing eutrophy, and it also provides

for a distinction between oligotrophic, mesotrophic, eutrophic, and hyper-eutrophic lakes

and reservoirs. The growing season (March —October) average TSI value was used to

rank each lake. Areas of lakes that exhibited trophic gradients or embayment differences

often were analyzed separately.

3.2.2 Primary Contact Recreation Use Support

Fecal coliform or Escherichia coli and pH data were used to indicate the degree of

support for primary contact recreation (PCR) (swimming) use. PCR assessment was

based on six monthly grab samples collected during the recreation season of May —

October. The use fully supported if the fecal coliform bacteria criterion of greater than

400 colonies per 100 mL (greater than 240 colonies per 100 mL for E. coli) was not met

in less than 20 percent of samples; it was impaired, partial support, if either criteria were

not met in 25-33 percent of samples; and impaired, nonsupport, if either criteria were not

met in greater than 33 percent of samples. Secondary contact recreation (SCR) was also

assessed following the same method using fecal coliform data at the concentration of

greater than 2000 colonies per 100 mL. Streams with pH less than 6.0 SU or greater than

9.0 SU were considered full support if these criteria were exceeded once, but in less than

10 percent of samples collected in the recreation season; impaired, partial support, if the

standard was exceeded more than once, but in less than 10 percent of the samples during

.:

Table 3.2.1-3. C

riteria f

or lak

e and reservoir us

e su

ppor

t cl

assi

fica

tion

.

rn

Category

Fish Consumption

Warmwater Aq

uati

c Habitat

Seco

ndar

y Contact Recrearion

Dome

stic

Supply

Not

(Pol

luta

nt specific)

(At lea

st two of the fo

llow

ing cr

iter

ia)

(At le

ast on

e of

the following cr

iter

ia)

(At le

ast on

e of the fo

llow

ing cr

iter

ia)

Supporting:

Meth

ylme

rcur

y >1

.00

Fish kills caused by

poo

r water qu

alit

yWidespread excess ma

crop

hyte

/mac

ro-

Chro

nic taste and od

or com

plai

nts caused by

ppm (f

ish tissue)

scop

ic algal growth

alga

e

Sev

ere hy

poli

mnet

ic (dee

pest

layer in a

Chro

nic nuisance alg

al blo

oms

Chro

nic trea

tmen

t problems caused by poo

r

PCBs >1.

9 ppm (f

ish

~~ally st

ratified lak

e or reservoir)

water qu

alit

y

tissue)

oxyg

en depletion

Dissolved oxy

gen av

erag

e less tha

n 4

Exceeds drinking wat

er MCL

mg/L in

the

epilimnion (up

per most layer

of water in a thermally str

atif

ied la

ke or

reservoir)

Partially

Dissolved ox

ygen

ave

rage

les

s th

an 5

Loca

lize

d or seasonally ex

cess

ive

Occasional taste and

odo

r co

mpla

ints

caused by

Supporting:

Meth

ylme

rcur

y >0

.30

mg/L in the epilimnion

macrophyte/macroscopic alg

al growth

alga

e

(At le

ast

—1.00 ppm (f

ish

tissue)

one of

the

Seve

re hyp

olim

neti

c ox

ygen

depletion

Occa

sion

al nuisance algal bl

ooms

Occasional tre

atme

nt pro

blem

s caused by po

or

following

pCBs >0.2 ppm —1.9

water qu

alit

y

crit

eria

)ppm (f

ish tissue)

Othe

r sp

ecif

ic cause (e

.g. lo

w pH)

High sus

pend

ed sediment co

ncen

trat

ions

during the re

crea

tion

season

Ful

lyMe

thyl

merc

ury <0

.30

None of the ab

ove

None of t

he above

None of the ab

ove

Sup

port

ing:

ppm and

PCBs <0.

2 ppm

Left Intentionally Blank

the recreation season; and impaired, nonsupport, if the criterion was exceeded in more

than 10 percent of samples during the recreation season.

3.2.3 Other Data Sources

Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs). Dischazge monitoring report (DMR)

data, collected by Kentucky Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (KPDES) permit

holders, were assessed through KDOW's permit compliance database. Depending on the

relative sizes of the wastewater discharge, the receiving stream and the severity of the

permit exceedences, it sometimes was possible to assess in-stream uses as nonsupporting

either AL or PCR. Because in-stream data were usually not collected, stream

assessments based only on DMR data were considered evaluated, not monitored, and

these segments were assigned to category SB.

Corps of Engineers (COE) Reservoir Projects. Dam projects on major streams

in Kentucky were monitored with the cooperation of the COE. During the Interagency

Monitoring and Planning Meeting those reservoirs in the BMiJ of focus were identified

and a cooperative effort between KDOW and COE resulted. Reservoir water-quality

variables were monitored over the growing season (Mazch — October) as were major in-

flow and out-flow tributaries of these reservoirs. Aquatic life use support level was

determined using these monitored data for reservoir and monitored tributaries. The

Nashville and Louisville COE districts manage those projects in Upper Cumberland — 4-

Rivers BMU and Green — Tradewater BMiJ, respectively.

3.2.3 Fish Consumption Use Support

Fish consumption, in conjunction with aquatic life use, assesses attainment of the

fishable goal of the Clean Water Act. Assessment of the fishable goal was separated into

these two categories in 1992 because the fish consumption advisory does not preclude

attainment of the aquatic life use and vice versa. Separating fish consumption and

aquatic life use support gives a clearer picture of actual water quality conditions. Table

3.2.1-1 relates those criteria used to make fish consumption use support decisions, and

Table 3.2.1-3 shows the concentrations of methylmercury and PCBs that result in a

specific level of support; these concentrations apply to lakes, reservoirs and streams.

70

Kentucky revised its methodology for issuing fish consumption advisories in 1998

to a risk-based approach patterned after the Great Lakes Initiative. The risk-based

approach generally is more conservative than the Food and Drug Administratidn (FDA)

action levels that were used previously. For example, the FDA action level for mercury

was 1.0 mg/Kg, but the risk-based number for issuing an advisory is as low as 0.12

mg/Kg. As a result of this change in methodology, a statewide advisory was issued in

Apri12000 for children under six and women of childbearing age to not consume more

than one meal per week of any fish from Kentucky waters because of mercury. However,

EPA (2001 a) issued a draft mercury water quality criterion expressed as a methylmercury

concentration in fish tissue of 0.30 mg/Kg. Therefore, for purposes of 305(b) reporting,

waters were not considered impaired unless fish exhibited methylmercury tissue

concentrations of at least 030 mg/Kg. In other words, the fish tissue concentration

triggering the statewide advisory (0.12 mg/Kg) was considered more stringent than water

quality standards.

Other than the statewide advisory for mercury explained above, the following

criteria were used to assess support for the fish consumption use:

• Fully supporting- no fish consumption restrictions or bans in effect;

highest species concentration < 030 mg/Kg

• Impaired: Partial support- "restricted consumption," fish consumption

advisory in effect for general population or a subpopulation that

potentially could be at a greater cancer risk (e.g. pregnant women,

children); highest species concentration > 0.30 mg/Kg —1.00 mg/Kg.

Restricted consumption was defined as limits on the number of meals

consumed per unit time for one or more fish species

• Impaired: Not supporting- a no consumption fish advisory or ban in

effect for general population or a subpopulation that potentially could

be at greater risk, for one or more fish species, or a commercial fishing

ban in effect; highest species concentration > 1.00 mg/Kg.

71

3.2.4 Drinking Water Supply

Drinking water use support was determined in several ways (Table 3.2.1-1). First,

compliance with maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) in finished water was determined

by the annual average of quarterly samples. These MCL data were gleaned from montlily

operating reports (MORs) submitted to KDOW, Drinking Water Branch, from treatment

facilities. Drinking water use assessments in reservoirs were supplemented by surveys of

drinking water operators on any taste and odor problems and use of biocides (Table 3.2.1-

1). In-stream water quality data. generally were not available to assess drinking water

use.

3.2.5 Causes and Sources

Causes (pollutants and pollution) and sources were categorized according to EPA

guidance. Causes for primary contact recreation, fish consumption, and water supply

usually were easily identified. The majority of segments or waterbodies not supporting

aquatic life use were deternuned by biological monitoring supplemented by monitoring

of select physicochemical pazameters. Causes and sources of impairment may not be

evident in the field and there may be other pollutants contributing to use impairment that

were not listed. Once on the 303(d) list, subsequent intensive monitoring and watershed

reconnaissance of land uses witl more fully identify causes and sources of impairments.

3.2.6 Determination of Assessment Segments

Once an assessment was made on a waterbody, an appropriate segment or portion

of the waterbody representative of the monitored area was determined. Part of this

determination was based on the type of monitoring (e.g. physicochemical, biological,

bacteriological, fish tissue, or lake/reservoir).

Aquatic Life, Recreation and Fish Consumption Uses. This monitoring

activity occured throughout the state at the Primary Ambient Water Quality Stations

(Primary Network) and in the Rotating Watershed Stations particular to the BMiJ cycle

phase. Since the Primary Network stations are located on lazge streams and rivers, these

assessment segments are taken downstream and upstream of significant streams entering

the monitored stream. Significance of tributaries is based on the watershed azea and

72

relative volume. Another important factor considered in defining segments is significant

changes in land use, such as from a contiguous forested area to anon-forested azea with

fragmented riparian vegetative zone. Habitat conditions along the comdor are assessed

for the same reasons as physicochemical parameters for biological communities. Since

many of KDOW's PCR-SCR (recreation) monitoring locations are associated with the

ambient water quality network, the same rationale is used to define these segments and

typically is the same as the defined seginent for the accompanying aquatic life use

assessment.

Waters assessed for aquatic life use with biological community data often will be

of shorter segment reach since biological indicators are typically more responsive to

subtle changes in water quality as they integrate these conditions over a relatively long

time. Typically the smaller the watershed, a proportionately greater segment will be

defined since the conditions and influences from surrounding land use were similaz and

localized. In larger watersheds, typically greater than five square miles, proportionately

smaller assessment segments are defined because of the increased potential of pollutant

sources and habitat influences. These segments often aze defined by upstream and

downstream tributaries judged to be of significant drainage area to the receiving stream.

Fish consumption segments aze defined in a similar method as those reaches

assessed using only physicochemical or bacteria data. Many fish species are relatively

far ranging, and that factor has significant consideration in defining segments. Also, with

the plethora of sources, and the likelihood that much of the mercury contamination in

waters comes via atmospheric deposition, relatively long reaches are often defined when

making these assessments. However, significant tributaries are often used to make the

upstream and downstream termini, with less consideration given to habitat for the reasons

given above.

Drinking Water Use. Since this use was assessed utilizing finished water data

supplied by Public Water Systems (PWS), the assessed segments were usually

conservative when applied to the source water. The assessment segments were typically

taken from the point of withdrawal and extended upstream one mile. A few exceptions to

that rule occurred when multiple uses were assessed (e.g. fish tissue, aquatic life) in the

same general azea of PWS withdrawal points. Those segments were usually longer (see

73

section above on these use assessment segments) in order to accommodate other uses that

overlapped the PWS withdrawal point. For reservoirs, the assessment was applied to the

waterbody.

3.3 Use Assessment Results, 2007-2008

Section Overview. This section of the IR presents assessment results focused

primazily on two BMLTs, the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green — Tradewater,

which were monitored in 2005 and 2006, respectively. However, a statewide summary

updating all waters and segments assessed prior to 2005 was incorporated into overall use

support summaries and statistics (10,563 miles representing approximately 12 percent of

stream miles at a resolution of 1:24,000 [Table 3.3.1-1]) and is presented in the following

subsection. Appendix A' contains a table with all assessed waters and the support level

per use assessed. Targeted and random biosurvey results of streams were presented with

particular focus on the two BMLTs of this reporting cycle. The KDOW continues to

census lakes and reservoirs in the commonwealth, and trend information on these

reservoirs is presented following 25 years of data related to trophic state analyses. The

COE reservoirs were monitored by that agency, and the results of those data and trophic

status of trends were also provided in the lakes section.

3.3.1 Statewide Assessment Results (Use Support)Targeted Monitoring: Streams and Rivers. For this monitoring and reporting

period (Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers and Green - Tradewater BMLJs) there were 563

stream segments representing 2,506 miles assessed in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers

BMU and 437 stream segments totaling 2,548 stream miles during the water ,years of

2005-2006. These data represent years three and four of the second five-year intensive

monitoring effort based on rotating BMiJs. Probabilistic monitoring results are included

in the targeted monitoring statistics since that method is used for both specific stream

reach assessments as well as extrapolation of data for aquatic life use support in a given

BMU. Miles of streams and segments that are fully supporting assessed uses (Categories

1, 2 which includes 2B) tota14,538; streams and rivers with segments not fully

supporting assessed uses (Categories 4A, 4B, 4C, SA and SB) tota16,562 miles (Table

74

33.1-1). T'he uses most commonly assessed were aquatic life, primary and secondary

contact recreation and drinking water. There were 9,184 total stream miles (51.5 percent)

fully supporting those six designated uses (Table 3.3.1-2).

Aquatic Life Use. Nonsupport category of warm water and cold water aquatic

habitat uses continues to represent the greatest number of assessed stream miles, with

4,474 combined miles (Table 33.1-2) representing 47 percent of stream miles assessed

for aquatic life use. This increase of 8.4 percent represents an additiona1733 miles

compared to the 2006 IR reporting cycle (3,741 mi.) (KDOW, 2006b) The frequency of

assessed miles not fully supporting is the second highest in the state (by percentage of

designated use assessed miles). Compared to the 2004 305(b) report, stream miles that

do not support aquatic life use have increased 1,479 miles.

Fish Consumption. The percentage of assessed stream miles that fail to support

this DU is 35.3 percent (Table 3.3.1-2), compared to 58.1 percent in the 2006 IR. This is

a direct effect of removing the Ohio River stream miles from the Kentucky ADB, a result

of this waterbody treated as interstate waters deferring to ORSANCO's 305(b) report for

the Ohio River mainstem (ORASANCO, 2008). Besides the statewide fish consumption

advisory for mercury, longstanding waterbody-specific consumption advisories for fish

remain in effect in several rivers and streams throughout the commonwealth

(http://www.water.ky.gov/sw/advisories . Two new waterbodies were added to the

waterbody-specific consumption advisory due to both

methylmercury and PCBs: Knox Creek and Fish Trap Lake, both in Pike County. Knox

Creek originates in Virginia and is a tributary of Tug Fork River. Fishtrap Lake is

approximately 1,100 surface acres and was formed by impounding the Levisa Fork. The

fish consumption advisory includes the entire reservoir and the Levisa Fork from the

reservoir backwaters to the Kentucky -Virginia state line. Virginia has a similar fish

consumption advisory on Knox Creek to headwaters and a portion of Levisa Fork. The

primary source of mercury entering waters is thought to be via air emissions. Because of

75

Tabl

e: 3.

3.1-1. Size of

Surface Waters assigned to

rep

orti

ng cat

egor

ies) for

Kentucky

Waterbodv

Type

Cate~ory

Tota

l To

tal

Seg

ment

s

12

2B2

34A

4B

4C

55B

RIVER (MILES)

17.30

3870.11

650.

70185.10

396.68

0.00

1.30

6082.77

81.7

010

,553

.26

1981

FRESHWATER 53

,890

.0065,881.0512

,451

.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

459.00

98,866.10

0.00

219,

096.

1511

5RESERVOIR

(ACRES)

~

SPRING (MILES)

0.00

0.03

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

10.4

50.50

10.48

12

FRESHWATER

0.00

315.00

193.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

256.00

0.00

571.

0012

LAKE (ACRES)

POND (ACRES)

0.00

3.30

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.50

0.00

4.80

2

FRESHWATER

0.00

0.00

0.00

3240

00.0

00.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

324,

000.

000

WETLANDS

(ACRES)

'Re

fer to Table 3.2

-1 on pag

e 47 for

a definition of eac

h re

port

ing category

Z"To

tal in

State" sum doe

s no

t in

clud

e mi

les in

thi

s su

bcat

egor

y as

these mil

es may als

o occur in oth

er categories (

i.e.

1, 2

, 4B, 5 and SB)

Left Intentionally Blank

~~1

Table 3.3.1-2. Individual designate use support summary for streams and rivers inKentucky (miles)

Supporting-Not

Supporting- AttainingSupporting-

Designated Total in Total Attaining wQ NotAttaining

NotUse State Assessed WQ Standards wQ Assessed

Standards butStandards

Threatened

Warm WaterAquatic 10,192.55 9,169.85 4,768.35 2.2 4,399.3 1,022.2Habitat

Cold WaterAquatic 365.01 360.61 285.81 0 74.8 4.4Habitat

FishConsumption

10,553.26 1,244.8 805.0 0 439.8 9,308.46

PrimaryContact 10,553.26 4,493.03 1,345.5 0 3,147.53 6,060.23Recreation

SecondaryContact 10,553.26 1,867.68 1,294.85 0 572.83 8,685.58Recreation

DrinkingWater

869.25 684.35 684.35 0 0 184.9

interstate issues and complexity of identifying all sources of mercury, EPA is conducting

national studies and will likely be involved in eventual efforts to calculate TMDLs and

reduce mercury inputs by setting new mercury limits.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are man-made chemical products that are similar

in structure. These chemicals aze toxic and persistent in the environment. In 1976

Congress passed legislation that prohibits the manufacture, process and distribution in

commerce of PCBs. Polychlorinated biphenyls contaminate fish flesh in six streams

totaling 142.8 miles as listed below:

• Knox Creek from mouth at Tug Fork River to Kentucky -Virginia state line

• Levisa Fork from Fishtrap Lake backwaters to Kentucky -Virginia state line

77

~ Mud River from Hancock Lake Dam to mouth in Logan, Butler and Muhlenbergcounties

• Town Branch Creek, headwaters to mouth in Logan, Butler and Muhlenbergcounties

• West Fork Drakes Creek, dam at City of Franklin to mouth in Simpson andWarren counties

• Little Bayou Creek from headwaters to mouth in McCracken County

Primary (Swimming) Contact Recreation Use. The percentage of assessed

stream miles .that do not support primary contact recreation (PCR) is now the highest of all

uses at 70.1 percent (Table 3.3.1-2). This represents a 46.6 percent increase over 2006

number of assessed miles not supporting recreation uses. This designated use also

represents the second highest number of assessed stream miles, 4,493.03 (Table 3.3.1-2).

Note that this designated use applies during the recreation months of May through October.

There continues to be a number of swimming advisories on segments of streams and

rivers in Kentucky. Below are the waterbodies and segments where advisories exist. Fish

consumption advisories on the Ohio River may be found in Section 3.3.3. One may also

access this information at: http://www.water.k~gov/sw/advisories/swim.htm.

Upper Cumberland River Basin

• Cumberland River from SR 2014 bridge to Pineville SR 66 bridge and from SR 219bridge to Harlan

• Martins Fork from Harlan to Cawood Water Plant• Catrons Creek

Clover ForkUpper Cumberland River Basin (cont.~• Straight Creek• Poor Fork from Harlan to Looney Creek• Looney Creek from mouth to Lynch Water Plant Bridge

Lower Licking River Basin

• Banklick Creek• Threemile Creek

North Fork Kentucky River Basin

• North Fork Kentucky River upstream of Chavies to source (headwaters)

'secondary Contact Recreation Use. Secondary contact recreation designated use

applies year-round, and criteria for support of this use aze based on fecal coliform standard

of 2000 colonies/mL in streams, lakes and reservoirs. There are 572.83 miles not

supporting this use out of 1867.68 miles of streams assessed. This represents 30.7 percent

of assessed waters that do not support this designated use. Compared to 2006 results, this is

an increase of 50.4 percent. With the implementation of E. coli as the indicator organism

for recreation-monitored waters, the SCR use will have decreasing number miles assessed

since there are no EPA-recommended criteria based on E. coli. No comparison for years

prior to the 2006 IR can be made as no assessments for the SCR use in flowing waters were

made based on pathogens. In streams and rivers, the secondary contact recreation standard

is applied to protect people from incidental water contact or partial body emersion that may

occur in such activities as fishing and boating.

Drinking Water Use. Drinking water standards apply to the source water at point

of intake. Drinking water use support was assessed by review of the average quarterly

results for contaminants as reported in MORs (monthly operating reports that are required

by the Safe Drinking Water Act). The average annual result of these quarterly data is

determined for compliance purposes. The MCLs (maximum contaminant levels) are based

on concentration of each contaminant in the finished product distributed for public

consumption. Of those streams assessed, all were fully supporting drinking (domestic)

water use.

Probability Monitoring: Aquatic Life Use. A simple question has been asked

throughout the 35-year history of the Clean Water Act: "What is the condition (health) of

the nation's waters?" Various studies have been undertaken to answer that question.

However, findings concluded that while agencies have been good at collecting data about

site-specific conditions of states' waters, there exist no data to determine the overall

condition and trend of the waters on a national scale. A national study was undertaken to

answer that question and related questions (Are water quality [fishable and swimmable]

conditions improving? Are there new issues and threats related to aquatic ecosystem health

or any successes?) to help citizens determine if more money and resources need to go

toward water quality issues, or if the billions of dollars being spent to curb and control

pollution is simply not working.

79

hydromodifications); 2) agriculture; 3) urban or municipal; 4) "source unknown;" and 5)

mining (Table 3.3.1-4). For the first time, habitat related (other than hydromodifications)

sources aze the leading contributor of causes per assessed river mile in the commonwealth.

Agriculture sources displaced "source unknown" in 2006 as the number one contributor and

is now second, associated with 2,777 miles of nonsupporting streams in Kentucky. The

category "Waste Disposal" has the greatest increase of miles since the last biennium, nearly

fourfold increase in total miles (609 miles currently). This increase is followed closely by

"Urban Municipal" and "Residential Related," each an approximate increase of 2x over the

same period of time (KDOW, 2006b). These statistics are the result of grouping related

sub-categories under broad categories to better reflect those significant sources that

contribute to impairment of streams in the state.

Individual use support by major river basin is shown in Table 3.3.1-5. This

overview of the commonwealth's major river basins shows the greatest percentage of

assessed river miles not supporting aquatic life use is found in the Mississippi River Basin.

The Big Sandy River has the second greatest percentage of nonsupporting miles followed

by the Tradewater River basin, the lower Cumberland River basin and the Ohio River

minor tributaries. Those particular basins (Mississippi, Big Sandy, lower Cumberland,

Ohio, and Tradewater) are each in azeas of intensive land use. The Big Sandy River Basin

is one of the most intensive coal producing areas, and the lower Cumberland, Mississippi

River, Ohio River minor tributaries and Tradewater River watersheds are in areas of large-

scale crop production. Approximately one-third or less of assessed stream miles in the

Mississippi and Big Sandy, lower Cumberland and Tradewater basins, and about 40 percent

of assessed river miles in the Tradewater River basin, fully support aquatic life use (Figure

3.3.1-1).

The most problematic basins for miles of nonsupporting primary contact recreation

are: Tennessee (94.4 percent); Mississippi (94.1 percent); Salt (85.6 percent); Big Sandy

(83.5 percent); and Tygarts (82.2 percent) (Table 3.3.1-5). Compared to the 2006 IR,

basins with an increase in percentage of assessed miles supporting PCR are the upper

Cumberland, Tradewater, Tennessee and lower Cumberland (Figure 3.3.1-2). These basins

(with the exception of Big Sandy) have one common denominator: widespread agriculture.

T'he Tennessee and Mississippi basins are intensely managed for agriculture, especially row

:~

cropping of soybeans and com and livestock (primarily cattle) production. Data reported

on in the 2004 305(b) report identified the Big Sandy River Basin as having a high

percentage of stream miles not supporting PCR primarily because of the high percent of

monitored streams where frequent observations were made of straight-pipes from houses

that discharged both gray and black water directly into streams. The associated pathogens

with the straight-pipe discharge have no effect on the aquatic life as they target warm-

blooded hosts. The upper Cumberland River basin has long been a problematic area for

pathogen-related water quality concerns. This region is mountainous with dense

populations residing in the narrow stream valleys, the only areas suitable for human

settlement and commerce. This landform does not have adequate soil types (shallow,

rocky) or land available outside floodplains for proper septic treatment. However, a

significant change in this region over the past 10 years has been afforded through federal

grant dollars becoming available to the area for constructing regional and cluster

wastewater treatment facilities. This has successfully moved communities to these

treatment facilities and out of floodplain and direct river discharge of untreated sewer water

from straight-pipes.

To better contrast the changes of designated use (specifically aquatic life and

primary contact recreation) support to the last 305(b) cycle on abasin-scale, Figure 3.3.1-2

illustrates the relative change in designated use support between the two periods. This

graph highlights that while this reporting cycle is focused on the Upper Cumberland — 4-

Rivers and Green Tradewater BMUs, this report includes a comprehensive statewide update

to all BMUs. Those basins that have a positive percent change (increase in full support)

considering both DUs are: Green; lower and upper Cumberland; Mississippi; Tennessee;

and Tradewater. The greatest decline in assessed DU is the Salt, Licking and Kentucky

basins for both DUs (Figure 3.3.1-2). A sure reason for this decline is attributable to

intensive TMDL-related monitoring studies in certain 303(d) listed watersheds during this

305(b) reporting cycle.

82

Table 3.3.1-3. Ranking of causes (pollutants) to Kentucky rivers and streams.Cause Total Size

1. Sedimentation/Siltation ..........................................................................3,003.672. Fecal coliform + E. coli (pathogen indicators) ......................................2,955.753. Nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators ........................................1,525.204. Habitat assessment (streams)* ..................................................................999.075. Cause unknown .........................................................................................730356. Organic enrichment (sewage) biological indicators .................................721.757. Total dissolved solids ...............................................................................704.628. Physical substrate habitat alterations ..........................................................478.49. Other flow regime alterations* ...................................................................471.910. Sulfates .....................................................................................................288.221 1. Methylmercury ...........................................................................................270.912. pH .............................................................................................................269.0813. Benthic-macroinvertebrates bioassessment (streams)* ............................257.6014. Turbidity ...................................................................................................219.5515. Iron ............................................................................................................213.4016. Particle distribution (embeddedness) ........................................................210.5017. Specific conductance ................................................................................150.2518. Phosphorus (total) .....................................................................................139.1019. Oxygen, dissolved* ...................................................................................118.3520. Polychlorinated biphenyls ..........................................................................94.3021. PCB in fish tissue ........................................................................................74.4022. Total suspended solids (TSS) .....................................................................73.4523. Alteration in stream-side or littoral vegetative covers*..............................64.8024. Chloride ......................................................................................................64.7525. Nitrate/nitrite (nitrite +nitrate as N) ...........................................................61.6025. Mercury in fish tissue .................................................................................61.6027. Lead ............................................................................................................61.4028. Aquatic algae* ............................................................................................49.2029. Copper .........................................................................................................48.1030. Dissolved oxygen saturation* .....................................................................47.2031. Nonative fish, shellfish or zooplankton ......................................................44.7032. Temperature, water* ...................................................................................41.9533. Fishes bioassessment (streams)* ................................................................41.6034. Cadmium .....................................................................................................40.2035. Ammonia (un-ionized) ................................................................................33.9036. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) ...................................................................14.4037. Zinc .............................................................................................................11.8038. Mercury .......................................................................................................11.4039. Non-native aquatic plants* .........................................................................10.1040. Nitrogen (total) .............................................................................................9.5041. Aquatic plants (macrophytes)* .....................................................................9.2042. Chloride ........................................................................................................8.6043. BOD, carbonaceous ......................................................................................8.1044. Manganese ....................................................................................................7.70

83

Table 33.1-3 (cont.). Ranking of causes (pollutants) to Kentucky rivers and streams.Cause Total Size

45. Ethylene glycol .............................................................................................6.9046. Nickel ............................................................................................................3.6047. Chromium (total) ..........................................................................................2.6048. Nitrates ..........................................................................................................0.20*Pollution rather than pollutants

Table 3.3.1-4. Probable sources of impairment to Kentucky rivers and streams.Source Cate ~ories Miles

Habitat Related (other than hydromodification)Loss of riparian habitat .......................................................................1335.4Channelization......................................................................................611.7Streambank modifications/destabilization ............................................526.2Site clearance (land development or redevelopment) ...........................222.4Dredging (e.g. navigation channels) .....................................................140.1Habitat modification —other than hydromodification ............................14.1

Category total .................................................................................................2,849.9

AgricultureUnspecified .........................................................................................1177.7Non-irrigated crop production ..............................................................659.7Crop production (crop land or dry land) ...............................................369.3Managed pasture grazing ......................................................................189.2Grazing in riparian or shoreline zones ..................................................117.4Irrigated crop production ........................................................................84.9Rangeland grazing ..................................................................................82.5Animal feeding operations (NPS) ...........................................................41.6Manure runoff .........................................................................................21.9Unrestricted cattle access ........................................................................15.6Permitted runoff from confined animal feeding operations (CAFOS).....5.0Crop production with subsurface drainage ...............................................4.5Dairies (outside milk parlor areas) ...........................................................3.6Specialty crop production ......................................................................... 3.6

Category total (agriculture) ............................................................................2,776.5

Urban or MunicipalMunicipal point source discharges .......................................................829.7Discharges from municipal sepazate storm sewer systems (MS4) .......611.7Urban runoff/storm sewers ...................................................................360.4Unspecified urban stormwater ..............................................................342.6Sanitary sewer overflows (collection system failures) .........................240.3Wet weather discharges (point source and combination ofstormwater, SSO or CSO) .......................................................................50.6

Municipal (urbanized high density area) ................................................77.7

;~~

Table 3.3.1-4 (cont.). Probable sources of impairment to Kentucky rivers and streams.Source Cateeories Miles

Impervious surface/parking lot runoff ....................................................25.4Combined sewer overflows ......................................................................6.5

Category total .................................................................................................2,544.9

Source Unknown (total) .................................................................................2,342.5

MiningSurface mining ......................................................................................756.0Subsurface (hardrock) mining ..............................................................239.7Coal mining ....................................................................:.....................239.6Acid mine drainage ...............................................................................131.8Impacts from abandoned mine lands(inactive) ....................................129.0Heap-leach extraction mining .................................................................78.5Coal mining (subsurface) ........................................................................43.2Mine tailings ...........................................................................................21.0Dredge mining ........................................................................................12.8Reclamation of inactive mining ................................................................7.4Sand gravel/rock mining or quarries ........................................................6.6Reclamation of inactive mining ................................................................5.9

Category total (minin~ ..................................................................................1.671.5

Residential RelatedPackage plant or other permitted small flows discharges .....................443.0On-site treatment systems (septic systems and similardecentralized systems) ..........................................................................358.7Sewage discharges in unsewered areas .................................................118.4Rural (residential areas) ..........................................................................75.8Unspecified domestic waste ...................................................................74.3Residential districts .................................................................................13.3

Category total .................................................................................................1,083.5

Waste DisposalInappropriate waste disposal .................................................................440.8Landfills................................................................................................15 5.3Septage disposal ........................................................................................8.7Illegal dumps or other inappropriate waste disposal ................................4.4

Category total ....................................................................................................609.2

m

Table 3.3.1-4 (cont.). Probable sources of impairment to Kentucky rivers and streams.Source Categories Miles

MiscellaneousOther recreational pollution sources .......................................................20.0Wet weather discharges (non-point source) ...........................................17.1Drought-related impacts .........................................................................14.9Sources outside state jurisdiction or borders ............................................7.4Drainage/filling loss of wetlands ..............................................................4.8Off-road vehicles ......................................................................................4.5Other spill related impacts ........................................................................2.5NPS pollution from military base facilities (other than port facilities......2.6Golfcourses ..............................................................................................4.8

Category total ....................................................................................................527.4

Erosion and SedimentationPost-development erosion and sedimentation ......................................310.9Channel erosion incision from upstream hydromodifications ................53.2Sediment resuspension (contaminated sediment) ...................................33.9Erosion from derelict land (barren land) ................................................15.8Sediment resuspension (clean sediment) ................................................11.6

Category total ....................................................................................................425.4

SilvicultureSilviculture activities ............................................................................157.8Silviculture harvesting ..........................................................................146.6Woodlot site management ......................................................................43.6Woodlot site clearance ............................................................................37.5Permitted silvicultural activities ...............................................................9.0Silviculture reforestation ..........................................................................6.6

Category total ....................................................................................................401.1

TransportationHighway/road bridge runoff (non-construction related) ......................273.3Highways, roads, bridges, infrastructure (new construction) .................90.3Airports.....................................................................................................1.7

Category total ....................................................................................................365.3

IndustrialIndustrial point source dischazge ............................................................89.7Industrial/commercial site stormwater discharge (permitted) ................79.0Unpermitted discharge (industriaUcommercial wastes) .........................21.4Commercial districts (industrial pazks) ....................................................4.8

Category total ....................................................................................................194.9

:.

Table 3.3.1-4 (cont.). Probable sources of impairment to Kentucky rivers and streams.Source Cate~es Miles

Fuel or Energy Related (other than coal)Petroleum/natural gas activities ..............................................................31.2Petroleum natural gas production activities (permitted) .........................13.7

Category total ......................................................................................................44.9

Hydromodifrcations: dams or impoundments (stream flow)Dam or impoundment .............................................................................22.2

Impacts from hydrostructure flow regulation/modification ...................14.2Upstream impoundments (e.g. NRCS structures) .....................................3.6

Category total ......................................................................................................40.0

87

Table 33.1-5. Number of river miles assessed and level of support by use in each majorriver basin. Those basins in bold type aze emphasized in this reportingcycle.

Basin TotalAssessed Su ortin

PartiallySu ortin Not Su ortin

Big SandX

Aquatic Life644.4 210.8 274.8 159.7

Fish Consumption66.6 48.4 15.3 0.0

Primary Contact Rec.288.1 95.2 21.0 219.5

Secondary Contact Rec.48.0 0.0 2.5 45.5

Drinking Water48.1 48.1 0.0 0.0

Green River

Aquatic Life 1869.8 1075.6 440.3 354.0Fish Consumption 338.3 176.2 101.0 61.1Primary Contact Rec. 1043.3 422.3 206.9 424.2Secondary Contact Rec. 616.4 362.3 81.6 172.5Drinking Water 274.5 255.4 0.0 0.0

Kentuck~River


Licking River

Aquatic Life756.6 390.1 223.6 143.0Fish Consumption



Drinking Water155.7 115.1 39.9 0.736.3 36.6 0.0 0.0

Little Sandv

Aquatic Life 210.7 108.3 85.9 16.5Fish Consumption 25.6 25.6 0.0 0.0Primary Contact Rec. 62.3 60.6 0.0 1.7Secondary Contact Rec. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Drinking Water 14.3 143 0.0 0.0

::

Table 3.3.1-5 (cont.). Number of river miles assessed and level of support by use in eachmajor river basin. Those basins in bold type are emphasized in thisre ortin c cle.

Basin TotalAssessed Su ortin

PartiallySu ortin Not Su ortin

Lower Cumberland

Aquatic Life 354.9 135.1 126.8 90.4Fish Consumption 48.8 39.4 9.4 0.0Primary Contact Rec. 179.2 50.2 38.6 93.0Secondary Contact Rec. 2.4 0.0 2.4 0.0Drinkin Water 33.2 33.2 0.0 0.0Mississippi River

Aquatic Life2'75.7 57.6 117.4 100.7Fish Consumption93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0Primary Contact Rec.63.2 3.7 12.2 47.25Secondary Contact Rec.5.4 0.0 0.0 5.4Drinking Water0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Ohio River (minor tribs)

Aquatic Life489.7 203.1 144.5 142.2Fish Consumption29.6 22.4 0.0 7.2Primary Contact Rec.159.1 60.3 12.6 86.2Secondary Contact Rec.X9.4 60.9 0.0 18.5Drinking Water0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Salt River


Tennessee River


;•

Table 3.3.1-5 (cont.). Number of river miles assessed and level of support by use in eachmajor river basin. Those basins in bold type are emphasized in thisrenortin~ cycle

Basin Total PartiallyAssessed Supporting Supporting Not Supporting

Tradewater River

Aquatic LifeFish Consumption

292.8 110.4 71.6 110.8



Drinking Water105.4 34.8 17.0 53.60.0 25.8 0.0 0.0

Tygarts Creek

Aquatic Life 113.3 96.2 16,0 1.1Fish Consumption 56.3 10.6 0.0 45.7Primary Contact Rec. 55.6 9.9 0.0 45.7Secondary Contact Rec. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Drinking Water 10.6 10.6 0.0

Upper Cumberland

Aquatic LifeFish Consumption

1320.3 835.2 254.3 230.9



Drinking Water178.6 88.6 4.0 86.0g6.5 86.5 0.0 0.0

Figure 3.3.1-1. Aquatic life and primary (swimming) contact recreation use support bymajor river basins in Kentucky.

I~ gooj ~ so

so°o, ~oa~ 60

i ~ 50

LL 40M

I y 3Qi ~

d 20a

10

0

❑Aquatic Life Use ~i Primary Contact Rec. Uses

9 C ~-° !~ C'rfi ~O ?y~ p4 ~ ~'i 7~ J~ 7~ A~, y~ o,A ~f~,~y~ 4j9~ ~u~~ay ~~,,cG~~r~S~,AA' ~O~~~i ~'~P °~es~ °e~df~ ~`q'~sC~ A~~,CG 6

~i,~ N,, 'Q 70~, iA iS? ~ N/7'

d7 ~i~' dija ~~, a,Q~i' ate.

River Basins ~'SJ

•~

Figure 3.3.1-2. Percent change regarding full support level (based on stream miles) inmajor Kentucky river basins between 2006 and 2008 305(b) cycle.

40

30

m 20

'~ ~ 10U

i 0

~I -10~ ~1 a-20

-30

~ s!0

a

ii

~ o Aquatic Life Usei ~

■ Primary Contact Rec. Use

i

i

e~9 sahCreen ~~'ntV~~~GFjp9 ~rt/e S~OWer M~Ss~s ~h~° l~Sa~tR T~'h'~rrarye r~'9a vpoe~°yR R ~'R. R a'ay ~i,~,,b S'pa~ ~~~„ s~ wafer, ~ ~r ~4,~

R, c yan R, o,.~ R, R bejyanRiver Basin aR 64tarles, aR

3.3.2 Use Assessment Results for 305(b) Reporting Cycle 2007 and 2008

Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMU. This BMU is divided in two primary

basins, the upper Cumberland River in southeast and south Kentucky and 4-Rivers in south-

central and west Kentucky. The Cumberland River basin rises in southeast Kentucky near

the Kentucky —Virginia border in Letcher County on the southeast slope of Pine Mountain.

It drains much of southeast Kentucky, enters Tennessee below Burlcesville, Kentucky, then

re-enters the commonwealth in west Kentucky just west of Fort Campbell military base,

discharging (30,441 cubic feet per second) into the Ohio River near Smithland after flowing

687 miles from the source waters. The entire drainage basin is 18,081 square miles and

drains parts of Kentucky and Tennessee. The Cumberland and Terulessee rivers parallel

each other, and both discharge into the Ohio River within nine linear miles of each other.

The diverse physiographic characteristics of these two portions of the BMU have

influenced the ecoregions and diversity of plants and animals immensely. These two

regions of the state are characterized by low mountains (Black Mountain elevation 4,145

ft.) and high plateau in the upper Cumberland River watershed transitioning to cypress

swamps, bottomland hardwoods and coastal plain regions in southwest and west Kentucky

where these rivers discharge, draining a region bound roughly from north to south from

southwest New York to north Alabama and east to the southern Appalachian provence of

91

Virginia. The upper Cumberland River basin drains approximately 6,250 squaze miles and

overall drains approximately 18,000 squaze miles in Kentucky and Tennessee. The

mainstem of the Cumberland River is approximately 700 miles (1,127 km) long. Major

tributaries (in Kentucky) include: 1) South Fork; 2) Little South Fork; 3) Rockcastle River;

and 4) Red River. Principal Kentucky cities in the basin are: Hazlan; Middlesboro; Corbin;

London Somerset; Burkesville; and Hopkinsville.

The Mississippi, Ohio and Tennessee rivers complete that portion of this BMU

known as "4-Rivers" (including the lower Cumberand River basin). These are large rivers;

the Tennessee River is the largest tributary of the Ohio. The Tennessee River drains 40,876

square miles covering portions of seven southeastern states as it courses along 652 river

miles draining physiographic regions as diverse as the Blue Ridge Mountains to coastal

plain where it discharges into the Ohio River near Paducah. The Ohio River discharges into

the Mississippi River near Cairo, Illinois at river mile 981. It is the largest tributary of the

Mississippi with an average discharge volume of 281,000 cubic feet per second draining

189,422 square miles of watershed extending from New York to Alabama. This river

represents an aquatic climatic transition zone as it courses along the periphery of the humid

subtropical and humid continental climatic zones integrating fauna and flora of both zones.

The Mississippi River is the largest river in the US, both in system length (2,320 miles) and

drainage area (1,151,000 square miles). It flows along Kentucky's western border with

Missouri for 68 miles.

Following are highlights of data and statistical analyses related to the two BMLTs of

emphasis for this particular 305(b) cycle, both targeted and probability-based water quality

and biosurveys to determine aquatic life use and other monitoring results as they relate to

each of the four designated uses. Appendix 3.A contains a complete table of monitoring

results for each specific water body and segment as related to streams and rivers. This table

contains all significant information in abbreviated form providing a quick reference for

each assessed water body or segment, the level of support, pollutants, related and sources.

For refinement to the degree of use support, nonsupport miles were further subdivided into

partial support and nonsupport categories based on physicochemical, MBI or KIBI scores

and are reflected in this 305(b) assessment. This assists KDOW and the public in

recognizing the relative degree of potential pollutant and habitat impacts on each system.

92

Appendix 3.B contains reach indexing maps of these assessment results based on NHD

1:24,000 scale data for this BMiJ.

Causes, Sources and Land Uses. Causes (pollutants) and sources of pollutants or

pollution particular to the Upper Cumberland — 4 Rivers BMU are listed in Table 3.3.2-1.

The upper Cumberland and lower Cumberland River have similar causes and sources of

impairment even though the two "basins" drain different physiographic provinces and

vaned drainage land uses particular to each portion of the basin. These physiographic

regions between the upper and lower basins have differing landscape and geologic

characteristics. The upper basin drains approximately 5,200 squaze miles within Kentucky,

primarily in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountains physiographic region, which

encompasses about 10,500 square miles. This region is a highly dissected plateau with

steep slopes and narrow sinuous valleys. The geologic stratigraphy is composed mainly of

sandstone, shale and coal. Thus, the pH is slightly lower in this region (decidedly so on the

south slope of Pine Mountain) as compared to most of the state with less buffering capacity

of those waters. The primary land uses in this region are deep and surface mineral (coal)

extraction, forest-related activities and small-scale livestock grazing, with small cities

dotting the landscape in the valleys. The limestone strata are primarily in that portion of

this basin that flows through the eastern Pennyroyal. This landscape is rugged, as it is the

foothills of the Cumberland Plateau, having fertile broad bottomland in the river valleys

where most of the agriculture is practiced. The terrain has significant karst with sinkholes,

caves and underlying streams that increases the sensitivity of the watersheds to surface

uses. In landscapes of significant resource extraction, sedimentation and dissolved solids

(specific conductance) and pH are often the prevailing pollutants as vegetation is removed

and bare soil and geologic strata are exposed. Elevated total dissolved solids are a

particulaz concern in these waters that often have low buffering capacity and are naturally

infertile. In areas of significant land disturbance and exposure of geologic strata, an

abundance of ions from minerals such as iron, magnesium and calcium are liberated into

the water column, along with other metals. These three impairments of issue within the

BMLT, along with related habitat disruption or loss, account for 487 miles of the 843 miles

(58 percent) impacted by the top five pollutants in the upper Cumberland basin (Table

3.3.2-1). The mentioned significant land uses in this basin are reflected in identified

93

sources of the pollutants. The top three sources are loss of ripazian habitat, surface mining

and legacy coal extraction; however, the largest portion ofpollutant-sources identified went

unrecognized and thus is listed as "source unknown" (38 percent) (Table 3.3.2-1).

The lower Cumberland basin is composed of one HLJC (05130205) with a drainage

area of 1,351 square miles. This watershed is located in the western Pennyroyal

Physiographic Region. The landscape is of similaz type, although the topography is less

rugged and mean elevations are lower with less kazstic conditions. Land use is primarily

agriculture, with a significant acreage cultivated for corn and soybean production; livestock

grazing occurs to a lesser degree. Recreation related uses are associated with Lake Barkley,

a large COE reservoir created by damming the mainstem Cumberland River, and adjacent

Land Between the Lakes recreation area (LJS Forest Service). This reservoir located in west

Kentucky and Tennessee has 57,920 total water-surface acres with 42,780 water-surface

acres in Kentucky. The largest city in this basin is Hopkinsville, with nearby Fort

Campbell Military Base to the south. Identified pollutants for this basin are primarily

pathogens (bacteria), sedimentation siltation and nutriendeutrophication biological

indicators, constituting 73 percent of affected stream mileage (Table 3.3.2-1). Primary

sources of these pollutants are identified as agriculture, source unknown and crop

production, which represents 73 percent of sources identified per affected stream mile

(Table 3.3.2-1).

The remainder of this BMU covers the Jackson Purchase region, an area bound on

the west by the Mississippi River, north by the Ohio River and east by the Tennessee River.

This region is alluvial with loess soils deposited from glaciated areas to the north.

Geologically the region is part of the Mississippi River delta, associated with the Gulf

Coastal Plain of the southeast US that extends from the mouth of the Mississippi River up

to the mouth of the Ohio River. The primary land use on this broad floodplain is row

cropping, primarily corn and soybeans. Much of the natural systems of this area have been

altered by this intensive agricultural use, particularly the draining of swamps and

bottomland hazdwoods for crop production.

r'~

Table 3.3.2-1. Number of assessed river miles of the top five causes and sources in themajor river basins within the 4-Rivers BMU and Green-TradewaterRivers BMU.

River Basin Miles MilesLower Cumberland

Causes SourcesPatho ens 129.0 Agriculture 320.4Sedimentation/Siltation 124.1 Source Unknown 197.6Nutrient/EutrophicationBiolo ical Indicators

108.3 Crop Production (Crop Land or DryLand)

170.2

Cause Unknown 77.7 Munici al Point Source Dischar es 138.5Organic Enrichment(Sewage) BiologicalIndicators

53.0 Non-imgated Crop Production 117.6

Mississi i RiverSedimentation/Siltation 177.35 Channelization 251.7Other Flow RegimeAlterations

76.8 Loss of Riparian Habitat 239.4

Patho ens 64.95 A 'culture 155.8NutrientlEutrophicationBiolo ical Indicators

51.65 Source Unknown 137.4

Habitat Assessment(Streams

41.2 Non-irrigated Crop Production 132.9

Tennessee RiverPatho ens 103.5 Source Unknor~m 207.2Cause Unknown 78.6 A riculture 144.45Sedimentation/Siltation 48.0 Channelization 64.5Nutrient/EutrophicationBiolo ical Indicators


Iron 24.0 Cro Production (Cro or D Land) 58.8

U er CumberlandSedimentation/Siltation 307.55 Source Unknown 322.95Patho ens 271.0 Loss of Ri arian Habitat 299.95H 89.98 Surface Minin 239.1S ecific Conductance 89.25 Le ac Coal Extraction 164.7Nutrient/EutrophicationBiolo ical Indicators

85.35 Agriculture 141.85

Ohio River MinorTributaries (4-Rivers &Green-Tradewater BMLn

95

Table 3.3.2-1. Number of assessed river miles of the top five causes and sources in themajor river basins within the 4-Rivers BMU and Green-TradewaterRivers BMU.

River Basin Miles MilesOhio River Minor

Tributaries (4-Rivers &Green-Tradewater BMU

Causes SourcesNutrientlEutrophicationBiolo ical Indicators


Sedimentation/Siltation 77.6 A riculture 103.5Patho ens 68.5 Industrial Point Source Dischaz es 96.0Physical Substrate HabitatAlteration

56.4 Source Unknown 94.6

Cause Unknown 44.6 Ina ro riate Waste Dis osal 88.8

Green RiverPatho ens 554.65 Source Unknown 718.5Sedimentation/Siltation 485.45 Loss of Ri arian Habitat 556.3Physical Substrate HabitatAlteration

282.6 Agriculture 415.85

Nutrient/EutrophicationBiolo icalIndicators

196.7 Channelization 391.6

Cause Unknown 176.55 Non-irri ated Cro Production 334.3

Tradewater RiverSedimentation/Siltation 108.8 Channelization 169.7Patho ens 81.65 Source Unknown 161.5Nutrient/EutrophicationBiolo icalIndicators


Other Flow RegimeAlterations

49.3 Surface Mining 144.7

Physical Substrate HabitatAlteration


The Tennessee River drainage in Kentucky is an area identified by two eight-digit

HLJCs, (06040005 and 06040006), with a total drainage of 1,041 square miles. The largest

tributary in this portion of the Tennessee River is the Clazks River, which discharges to the

Tennessee River four miles above its confluence with the Ohio River.

The Ohio River minor tributaries are identified by one eight-digit HUC (05140206)

and drains 326 square miles. The two principle streams in this drainage are Massac and

.,

Humphrey creeks; the greatest linear distance from the southern watershed boundary to the

Ohio River is about 17 miles.

The Mississippi River drainage is bound by three eight-digit HLJCs, 08010100,

08010201 and 08010202 encompassing 1,203 square miles. The Obion and Ma~eld

creeks watersheds aze the principal drainages directly discharging into the Mississippi River

in the Jackson Purchase (of course excluding the Ohio River).

The most significant pollutant in this region of great rivers is "sediments/siltation,"

accounting for 359 affected stream miles. Pathogen indicators impact 237 stream miles,

and nutrients also are identified as a significant pollutant in this basin, with 175 stream

miles affected. Significant sources of these pollutants are agricultural sources (596 stream

miles), loss of riparian habitat (376 stream miles) and "channelization" (canalization) (316

stream miles). Those pollutant-sources make sense from a relational association.

Sediment/siltation, pathogens and nutrients are closely associated; where one is prevalent,

particularly sedimentation siltation, the others are found also, and the loss of riparian

habitat nearly paralleling sedimentation/siltation in this basin. This pollutant affects more

stream miles than any other in this BMU, as well as Kentucky and the nation. Soils,

particularly clays, have high negative charges and thus adsorb cations readily, and these

constituents aze then transported to receiving streams where habitat buffering provided by

riparian vegetation has been lost. As wetlands were ditched and drained, the delayed result

was streams and ditches that filled in with sediments, resulting in substantial flooding and

erosion. The result is an ongoing cycle of filling and dredging of these stream channels.

Soils in this region are particularly susceptible to erosion since they are of particularly fine

material (sands and silts) from wind-carried loess.

Upper Cumberland River Basin

Targeted Monitoring: Aquatic Life Use. The tazgeted monitoring effort resulted

in 835 miles of 1320 miles (63 percent) assessed for aquatic life in the upper Cumberland

River basin as fully supporting (Table 3.3.2-3). This use may be considered the most

sensitive to impairments of all uses that apply to streams and lakes because all ecological

elements of the aquatic environment must be of a sufficient level of integrity and quality to

support aquatic communities dependent on the resource, (both water quality and in-stream

97

and out-of-stream habitat). While the majority of miles assessed at targeted monitoring

locations for aquatic life were assessed based on biological monitoring, some of those miles

were assessed using water physicochemical data at long-term and rotating watershed

locations.

One additional stream in the Cumberland River basin is proposed as a RR stream in

the 2008 Triennial Review (Table 3.1.42). It should be noted as each cycle phase is

repeated, a fewer number of stream miles will likely be added to the reference reach list

since there has been a concerted effort to locate all least impacted streams. However,

identifying new stream segments as exceptional (401 KAR 5:030) will be a part of

KDOW's overall monitoring strategy.

Targeted Monitoring: Fish Tissue. Fish tissue samples were analyzed for mercury

and PCB contamination in the upper Cumberland River basin. Of the 105 miles assessed

for fish consumption, 92 (about 88 percent) were in full support (Table 3.3.1-5).

Approximately 13 miles (12 percent) were not fully supporting this use.

Targeted Monitoring: Primary (Swimming) Contact Recreation. Water column

samples were analyzed for the presence and quantity of E. coli or fecal coliform colonies to

assess this use support. There were 536 river miles assessed in the upper Cumberland River

basin (Table 3.3.1-5). Of those river miles, 185 (3 5 percent) (Figure 3.3.1-1) were fully

supporting and 351 miles (65 percent) were partially or not supporting (Table 3.3.1-5). The

upper Cumberland River basin (above Pineville) has had along-standing swimming

advisory based on pathogens that remains in effect as of this cycle phase (see section 3.3.1).

There were two primary issues related to this high concentration of fecal coliform colonies:

municipal point source discharges, with a number of bypasses at wastewater treatment

facilities, and straight-pipes discharging untreated household wastewater. Both sources can

be tied to topography of the region, which is mountainous with narrow valleys associated

with stream and river courses. These valleys provide much of the suitable land where

housing can exist with reasonable access. However, available land to construct septic

systems with needed lateral lines typically does not exist. The soils in these bottomlands

often are poorly drained, further restricting proper on-site treatment in rural areas. A

related scenario exists for the wastewater treatment facilities, which often are built in the

flood zone of rivers, as these areas provide the limited sites to seat a facility. There is now

m

a concerted effort in this region to construct regional wastewater treatment plants; this is

being realized through federal grant moneys being made available to this economically

depressed region.

Targeted Monitoring: Domestic Water Supply. All miles (86.5) assessed in the

upper Cumberland River basin were fully supporting this use (Table 3.3.1-5).

Probability Biosurvey of BMU. A biosurvey of the upper Cumberland River basin

was performed according to EMAP and Kentucky SOP protocol (Methods for Assessing

Biological Inte~y Of Surface Waters in Kentucky), 2006. Because of significant

refinement and calibration to KDOW's MBI, comparisons to the 2000 results were

problematic and not comparable; therefore, drawing trend information comparisons

between the two monitoring years was not possible. As Table 3.3.2-3 conveys, out of 5,599

miles of target stream resources, 4,361 miles were represented in the probability analysis.

Once the probability data were extrapolated, 653 miles or 15 percent of wadeable streams

in this BMU were fully supporting aquatic life use, while 3531 miles or 81 percent of

wadeable streams were partially supporting, and four percent (177 miles) were not

supporting the aquatic life use (Table 3.3.2-3 and Figure 3.3.2-1).

Table 3.3.2-2. Aquatic use attainment results based on the 2003 probability biosurvey ofthe upper Cumberland River basin (all numbers rounded to nearestinteger).

Project ID Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMU(Upper Cumberland River Basin)

Target Population Streams Strahler Order 1-5Sample Frame EPA River Reach File 3 (1:100,000 Scale)Type of Water body Wadeable StreamsSize of Defined Stream Population 6,890 miSize ofNon-Defined Population 2,529 miSize of Defined Sampled Population 4,361 miDesignated Use Aquatic LifeAttaining Full Use Support 653 miNot Attaining Full Use (partial support) 3,531 miNot Attaining Full Use (nonsupport) 177Indicator Biology (Macroinvertebrates)Assessment Date 2005Precision 90% at 95%Confidence Level

..

Probability and Targeted Monitoring Compared (Aquatic Life Use). Proba-

bility and targeted monitoring results differed in the upper Cumberland River basin (Table

3.3.2-3). In this basin, the reference reach and other target-focused programs identified 280

miles, or 21 percent of those streams monitored and assessed, as candidates for and RR

waters (Tables 3.1.4-1 and 2). This has been the focus of targeted biomonitoring since the

late 1990s, and it became the significant focus with the inception of the rotating BMU

strategy in 1998. However, during the 2005 water-year the focus shifted toward

concentrating on water bodies and segments 303(d)-listed. In the BMU-wide assessment

data, including all monitoring efforts from 2005 and prior targeted monitoring results

Figure 3.3.2-1. Proportions of aquatic life use support in the Upper Cumberland Riverbasin based on probability biosurveys. Pie chart represents the entiredefined stream population (Strahler order 1— 5) in the basin.

Results of Probabilistic Biosurvey, Upper

Cumberland River Basin, 2005

4% 15%

D Full Support

■ Partial Support

~~ O Nonsupport

81%

account for 1320 miles of assessed waters and include 835 miles (63 percent) full support

for aquatic life use, 254 miles (19 percent) partial support and 231 (18 percent) nonsupport

(Table 3.3.2-3). In those numbers is significant stream mileage where assessment results

are based solely on physicochemical data. The number of water bodies assessed on these

data alone are small, but this monitoring occurs on large streams of Strahler order 6 and

greater. The streams with only physicochemical data are generally large (> 5th order) rivers

100

that provide a considerable amount of dilution, and the chances are small of collecting

water at the time any one particular pollutant passes with a concentration high enough to

exceed water quality criteria. Of those stream miles assessed with only physicochemical

data none in this basin were determined to be less than full support. Probability monitoring

design selects an equitable number of Strahler order 1 and 2 streams, in addition to Strahler

order 3 - 5. These smaller watersheds show stress in biological communities to relatively

smaller-scale perturbations than the large watersheds, which can often assimilate more

disturbances relative to watershed size. Also, the approach to locating sample locations

differs significantly between the two biological programs. The targeted stations are located

in the best available stream reach regardless of the monitoring program (Sections 3.1.1-3),

whereas the probabilistic approach is designed to randomly detect the prevailing habitat and

associated biological conditions in a defined stream population (like Strahler order

watersheds) at randomly select locations throughout the study area (BMLJ) without regard

to prevailing in-stream habitat.

Table 3.3.2-3. Comparison of probability and targeted monitoring results for aquatic lifeuse in the upper Cumberland River basin.Full Support Partial Support Nonsupport

Probability Target Probability Target Probability TargetMiles 653 835 3531 254 177 231Percent 15 63 81 19 4 18

4-Rivers Basin (Lower Cumberland, Lower Ohio [minor tributaries], Mississippi and

Tennessee)

Targeted Monitoring: Aquatic Life Use. The targeted monitoring effort resulted

in 539 miles (of 1,415 miles) (38 percent) assessed for aquatic life use in the 4-Rivers

basins as fully supporting (Tables 3.3.2-5). In this region of intensive agriculture and soil

type, determining the support level of aquatic life use will often be inconclusive or may be

difficult with less than biological community structure evaluation. This due is to the fact

that in large areas with row cropping as dominant land use, the results of chemical

monitoring are gratly affected by the timing of agricultural land management. Pesticide and

herbicide applications (under proper, prudent use) often are only applied after pest

101

management data signal the damage is approaching economic threshold where chemicaltreatment is cost-effective. Thus, if chemical monitoring is not timed to coincide with theseagricultural practices, the effects will go unnoticed in conventional physicochemicalmonitoring. While the majority of miles assessed at targeted monitoring locations foraquatic life were assessed based on biological monitoring, some of those miles wereassessed using physicochemical data at long-term and rotating watershed locations. Mostof these stations are large watersheds of greater than 5~'-Strahler order; determiningappropriate biological monitoring indicators and protocol are under development on anational level.

Fish Tissue. Fish tissue samples were analyzed for mercury and PCBcontamination in the 4-Rivers basins. This designated use was assessed on 199 streammiles; of those miles assessed, 86 percent were full support and 14 percent were less thanfull support (Table 3.3.1-5). Of the three basins considered in this portion of the BMLT, theonly basin with less than 75 percent not fully supporting this use was the Tennessee Riverbasin with a 57 percent (15 miles out of 26 miles) full support level.

Targeted Monitoring: Primary (Swimming) Contact Recreation. Water columnsamples were analyzed for the presence and quantity of fecal coliform colonies to assessthis use support. There were 511 river miles assessed in these basins for PCR (Table 3.3.1-5). Of those river miles, 120 (24 percent) (Figure 3.3.1-1) were fully supporting and 391miles (76 percent) were partially or not supporting this use. The majority of those streammiles not supporting this designated use were located in the Mississippi or Tennessee riverbasins. While all basins in this region are in predominantly agricultural production, thesetwo particular basins comprise the Jackson Purchase region which is intensively managedfor this single industry. There were two primary sources related to this high concentrationof bacteria colonies, agriculture and loss of riparian habitat. Where agriculture is anintensive land use, the loss of protective riparian vegetation (habitat) is most prevalent.Through efforts of the KDOW and federal agencies, funding (cost share and grants) andeducation for riparian zone-specific protection is ongoing, although there is much work leftto do.

Targeted Monitoring: Domestic Water Supply. All miles assessed in the 4-Rivers basins fully supported this use (Table 3.3.1-5).

102

Probability Biosurvey of 4-Rivers Basins. The 4-Rivers basins were sampled

according to EMAP and Kentucky SOP (Methods for Assessing Biological Integrityy Of

Surface Waters in Kentucky), 2006. Because of significant refinement and calibration to

KDOW's MBI, comparisons to the 2000 results were problematic and not comparable;

therefore, drawing trend information comparisons between the two monitoring years was

not possible. As Table 3.3.2-4 conveys, out of 7,443 miles of target stream resources, 5,600

miles were represented in the probability biosurvey and analysis. The target stream mileage

population (1,843 miles) is greater than the sampled target population since not all miles in

a study area can be accessed for many reasons, most commonly a result ofmiss-mapped or

identified features, but also less commonly due to physical risk in accessing certain areas.

Once the probability data were extrapolated, 254 miles or 17 percent of wadeable streams

in this BMU were fully supporting aquatic life use, while 5,346 miles, 83 percent of

wadeable streams were not fully supporting that use (Table 3.3.2-5 and Figure 3.3.2-2).

Table 3.3.2-4. Aquatic life use attainment results based on the 2005 probability biosurvey

of the 4-Rivers basins (numbers rounded to nearest integer).

Pro'ect ID 4-Rivers Basins Probability SurveyTarget Population Streams Strahler Order 1-5

Sample Frame EPA River Reach File 3 (1:100,000 Scale)Type of Water body Wadeable Streams

Size of Defined Population 7,443 miSize ofNon-Defined Population 1,843 miSize of Defined Sampled Population 5,600 miDesignated Use Aquatic LifeAttaining Full Use Support 565 miNot Attaining Full Use (nonsupport) 2,630 miNot Attaining Full Use (partial support) 2,404 miIndicator Biology (Macroinvertebrates)Assessment Date 2005Precision 90% at 95%Confidence Level

103

Figure 3.3.2-2. Proportions of aquatic life use support in the 4-Rivers basins, 2005, basedon probability biosurveys. Pie chart represents the entire definedstream population (Strahler order 1 — 5) in the basin.

Results of Probabilistic Biosurvey,4-Rivers Basin, 2005

50

~ D Full Support

■ Partial Support

❑ Nonsupport

Table 3.3.2-5. Comparison of probabilistic and targeted monitoring results for aquatic lifeuse in the 4-Rivers basins.Full Support Partial Support Nonsupport

Probability Target Probability Target Probability TargetMiles 254 539 1389 488 3,957 386Percent 17 38 57 35 26 27

Probability and Targeted Monitoring Compared (Aquatic Life Use). Pro-

bability and targeted monitoring results compare more closely in the 4-Rivers basins (Table

3.3.2-5) than in the upper Cumberland River basin. In the region identifying RR-quality

waters has been difficult given the intensively managed land. There have been 98 miles

(seven percent) of targeted streams identified as RR quality; a small fraction meeting those

criteria as compared to many basins in the commonwealth (three times fewer stream miles

as compared to the Upper Cumberland River basin) (Table 3.1.4-1). During this second

cycle, the BMU monitoring strategy has focused more in watersheds with 303(d)-listed

waters for purposes of TMDL development. This focus is beginning to bring the

104

nonsupport stream mile curves assessed between the targeted and probability programs

closer as the nonsupport miles increases in the targeted monitoring program. In the BMiJ-

wide assessment data from all monitoring efforts through 2005, targeted monitoring results

account for 1,413 miles of assessed waters and includes 539 miles (38 percent) full support

of aquatic life use, 488 miles (35 percent) partial support and 386 (27 percent) nonsupport

(Table 3.3.2-5). This contrasts with only 17 percent of miles fully supporting in the

probabilistic monitoring, which statistically is applied to the entire representative defined

sample population, while the targeted assessments include cumulative results from previous

years, with a bias toward those RR waters. Even with this bias, the relative similarity

between results of the two monitoring approaches indicates the overall poor condition of

aquatic habitat in these basins. This is a strong reflection of the wide-scale manipulation of

the aquatic and stream-side environment in this region.

With all basins, significant stream mileage exists where assessment results aze based

solely on physicochemical data. The number of water bodies assessed on these data alone

aze small, but this monitoring occurs on large streams of Strahler order 6 and greater.

These large watersheds (by volume) provide a considerable amount of dilution, and the

chances are small of collecting water at the time any one particular pollutant passes with a

concentration high enough to exceed water quality criteria. Of those stream miles assessed

with only physicochemical data, few were determined to be less than full support, although

the 4-Rivers basins did have a higher number of stream miles not fully supporting based on

results from this program. This was due to the geology, resultant water chemistry (soft,

lower buffered and pH normally less than 7.0 SU), particularly with regazd to metals, and

associated land uses.

Probability monitoring design selects an equitable number of Strahler order 1 and 2

streams, in addition to Strahler order 3 - 5. These smaller watersheds show stress in

biological communities to relatively smaller-scale perturbations than the large watersheds,

which can often assimilate more disturbances relative to watershed size. Also, the approach

to locating sample sites differs significantly between the two biological programs. The

targeted stations are located in the best available stream reach regardless of the monitoring

program (Sections 3.1.1-3), whereas the probabilistic approach is designed to randomly

detect the prevailing habitat and associated biological conditions in a defined stream

105

population (like Strahler order watersheds) at randomly selected locations throughout thestudy azea (BMU) without regard to prevailing in-stream habitat.

Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU. Two major river systems are combined toform this BMU (Figure 2.2-1). The Green River is the largest intrastate river system (i.e.mainstem of the river is wholly in Kentucky) in the commonwealth, draining an area of9,807 square miles, including a small area ofnorth-middle Tennessee. This river originatesin Lincoln County on the southwest face of Hall's Gap in south-central Kentucky. It flowsfor 300 miles after which it discharges into the Ohio River. There are four significanttributaries along this course: Nolin River; Barren River; Rough River and Pond River. TheGreen River basin flows through the Pennyroyal and Shawnee Hills (Western Coal Field)physiographic regions. A good portion of the basin associated with the mid-river valley issignificantly karstic, with Mammoth Cave the prominent feature of this vast cave network.This feature makes the Green River basin particularly susceptible to land uses since theSwiss-cheese latticework of underground channels results in surface water runoff quicklyreaching groundwater with little opportunity for natural filtration that would occur in non-kazst geology. These subterranean streams often form gaining streams discharging intosurface water flows. In 1969 the COE created an 8,200 acre flood-control reservoir on theGreen River mainstem, Green River Lake, which is located in the upper portion of the basinin south-central Kentucky. Most of the Pennyroyal (all but the southeastern quarter) isdrained by this river system and is rolling terrain with associated broad, fertile bottomlands.

The Shawnee Hills is a region of hilly upland of relatively high relief and containsmany swamps and bottomland hardwoods due to the poorly drained valleys. Thisphysiographic region is often referred to the Western Coalfield due to the significant coaldeposits. At one time Muhlenberg County was the largest coal producing county in thenation, and the lower Green River was an important shipping corridor for this minedresource; the river can be navigated by commercial barge traffic up to lock and dam #3(river mile 108.5) .

The Tradewater River drains the western portion of the Shawnee Hills region andoriginates in northern Christian County, about eight miles north of Hopkinsville. TheTradewater is a loes-gradient stream flowing through swampland characterized by cypresstrees. This river is a tributary of the Ohio River. It is 132 miles long and drains 932 square

106

miles, discharging into the Ohio River approximately five miles southwest of Sturgis. This

portion of the physiographic region is similar to that described in the above paragraph. As

with the lower Green River basin, the Tradewater River basin has had much surface coal

mining, especially during the 1970s and 1980s.

Causes, Sources and Land Uses. The top five causes (pollutants) and their sources

in this BMU, identified for each river basin, are shown in Table 3.3.2-1. As one might

expect, these two basins are mirror images of each other with respect to pollutants and

sources (Table 3.3.2-1). Pathogen-indicating bacteria and sedimentation siltation are the

two most prevalent pollutants; however, pathogen indicators are pollutants only with regard

to PCR and SCR uses. Pathogen causes affect 33 percent of assessed miles (555) in the

Green River basin and 24 percent (82 miles) in the Tradewater River basin. Similarly,

sedimentation siltation associated with aquatic life habitat use affects 29 percent (486

miles) and 32 percent (109 miles) of assessed stream miles in the Green and Tradewater

rivers basins, respectively. The leading sources of these pollutants strongly correlate to

extensive agricultural and mining land uses. As with the 4-Rivers basins, agricultural, loss

of riparian habitat and canalization (channelization) account for 67 percent of identified

causes (pollutants and pollution), affecting 2,126 miles combined. Those additional causes

associated with aquatic life habitat commonly occur in areas associated with agriculture and

mining, particulazly the nutrient/eutrophication, sedimentation siltation and physical

substrate habitat alteration. One of the most detrimental effects of stream habitat integrity

affecting aquatic life use support level is the source "Loss of Riparian Habitat" identified as

one of the top three most common source of impairment in the BMiJ (Table 33.2-1). This

is a source that is often a direct result of other land use-related sources of impairments such

as agriculture and resource extraction, and it is a major contributing factor to sedimentation

and siltation.

Targeted Monitoring: Aquatic Life Use. 'The targeted monitoring effort resulted

in 1,389 stream miles out of 2653 miles (52 percent) assessed for aquatic life use in the

Green — Tradewater River BMU fully supports this use (Tables 3.3.2-7). This is a region of

intensive agriculture and mining, two land uses that typically are not found mutually in

other parts of the state. The upper and middle section of the Green River basin (which

accounts for about two-thirds of this BMU) is mostly rural and small-scale agriculture in

107

the form of livestock grazing with limited row cropping. As with all BMUs, physical and

chemical monitoring form the primary basis for stream assessments for this use in large

streams greater than 5~' Strahler order. However, most pollutants included in the

physicochemical monitoring will go undetected without also assessing biological

communities such as macroinvertebrates that are integrators of these episodic pollutants.

Agricultural chemicals in particular aze infra-seasonally specific since pesticide and

herbicide applications often are only applied after pest management data signal the damage

is approaching economic threshold where chemical treatment is cost-effective. Thus, if

chemical monitoring is not timed to coincide with these agricultural practices, the effects

will go unnoticed during the growing season in conventional physicochemical monitoring.

To better assess large rivers, appropriate biological indicators and protocol aze under

development on a national level.

There are 333 miles of RR streams identified in this BMLJ, the overwhelming

majority of those miles in the Green River basin (Table 3.1.41). An additional 18.4 stream

miles in the Green River basin are candidate exceptional waters (Table 3.1.42) and will be

submitted for inclusion in 401 KAR 5:030 in the triennial review of 2008. These miles of

candidate exceptional stream segments represent less than one percent of the total number

of miles assessed for aquatic life use in this BMLJ. However, taken with the 333 miles of

RR streams, this represents a significant percentage (13 percent) of assessed stream miles in

the BMIJ. Given that finding RR streams was a priority in the first BMU cycle, it is likely

additional RR stream miles will be relatively few as targeted monitoring emphasis shifts to

TMDL monitoring. However, identifying new stream segments as exceptional (401 KAR

5:030) will be a part of KDOW's overall monitoring strategy.

Targeted Monitoring: Fish Tissue. Fish tissue samples were analyzed for mercury

and PCB burden in the Green — Tradewater BMLT. Of the 338 miles surveyed, 52 percent

of sampled stream miles were found to be supporting (Table 3.3.1-5). The two pollutants of

issue were mercury and PCBs. These nonsupporting water body segments are found in

portions of these streams: Mud River; Town Branch; Drakes Creek; Green River; and West

Fork Drakes Creek.

Targeted Monitoring: Primary (Swimming) Contact Recreation. Water column

samples were analyzed for the presence and quantity of E. coli and fecal coliform colonies

~:

to assess this use. There were 1,348 stream miles assessed in this BMU and 39 percent of

those stream miles fully support that use (Table 3.3.1-5). Even though this is a mostly rural

area, it contains extensive livestock grazing and row cropping in an area of extensive karst.

Agriculture has the greatest combined source of these pollutants in this BMU (Table 3.3.2-

1).

Targeted Monitoring: Domestic Water Supply. Out of 300 miles assessed in this

BMU, all of those stream miles are fully supporting this use (Table 3.3.1-5).

Probability Biosurvey of Green — Tradewater BMU. The Green — Tradewater

BMU was sampled according to EMAP and KDOW SOP (Methods for Assessing

Biological Irate grity Of Surface Waters in Kentucky), 2006. Because of significant wide-

spread drought conditions in this BMU in 2003, comparisons to those results were

problematic; therefore, trend information comparisons between the two monitoring years

were not made. Thus, many headwater streams in 2003 that might have been expected to

be part of the survey were excluded because of those drought conditions. As Table 3.3.2-6

shows, out of 9,991 miles of target stream resources, 9,445 miles were represented in the

probability analysis. Once the probability data were extrapolated, 2,607 miles or 28 percent

of wadeable streams in this BMU were fully supporting aquatic life use, while 6,837 miles

or 72 percent of wadeable streams were not fully supporting that use (Table 3.3.2-7 and

Figure 3.3.2-3). This probability survey did find a considerably greater aquatic life use

support level for this basin as compared to the upper Cumberland River and 4-Rivers basins

(15 and 17 percent, respectively). These findings are not confounding considering these

two BMUs and the intense land uses that are found in environmentally damaging on a

large-scale that is ongoing in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMU. The mountainous

upper Cumberland basin also supports a delicately balanced aquatic habitat given the

physical and chemical characteristics of its ecosystem. However, it should be noted the

Green River basin is home to sensitive, uncommon aquatic fauna, especially the

subterranean forms in the well-developed underground river systems.

109

Table 3.3.2-6. Aquatic use attainment results based on the 2004 probability biosurvey ofthe Green — Tradewater Rivers BMLJ.

Project ID Green — Tradewater BMU ProbabilitySurve

Target Population Streams Strahler Order 1-5Sam le Frame EPA River Reach File 3 (1:100,000 Scale)Type of Water body Wadeable StreamsSize of Target Population 9,991 miSize of Non-Tar et Po ulation 8,865 miSize of,Tar et Sam led Po ulation 9,445 miDesignated Use Aquatic LifeAttaining Full Use 2,607 miNot Attaining Full Use 6,837miIndicator Biolo (MacroinvertebratesAssessment Date 2005Precision 93% at 95%Confidence Level

Probability and Targeted Monitoring Compared (Aquatic Life Use).

Probability and targeted monitoring results differed the least in this BMLJ, as compared to

the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMU (Table 3.3.2-7). In this basin, there are 333 miles

or 13 percent of targeted stream miles identified as RR aquatic habitats (Table 3.13-1). In

this water-year, a number of miles were assessed as follow-up surveys on designated

reference reach stream segments to monitor the conditions through cycle phases. As is the

order of targeted monitoring within KDOW programs, a significant portion of the targeted

streams are Strahler order 4 or greater watersheds, whereas probability monitoring design

selects an equitable number of Strahler order 1 — 5 streams. These smaller watersheds

manifest stress in biological communities to relatively smaller-scale perturbations than

large watersheds, which can often assimilate more disturbances relative to watershed size.

Also, the approach to locating sample stations differs significantly between the two

biological programs. The targeted stations are located in the best available stream reach,

whereas the probabilistic approach is designed to randomly detect the prevailing habitat and

associated biological conditions in a defined stream population (like Strahler order

watersheds) at randomly selected locations throughout the study area. To illustrate this, the

Green — Tradewater BMU has 333 miles of RR streams, with 284 of those miles in the

Green River basin alone. Reference reach stream miles are often representative of a

fragment of the watershed that is an outstanding example of habitat and aquatic

110

communities. These types of occurrences are an example of the biased monitoring

strategies inherent to targeted monitoring that the probabilistic program avoids through

random, unUiased design and protocol.

Figure 3.3.2-3. Proportions of aquatic life use support in Green - Tradewater Rivers BMUbased on probability biosurveys. Pie chart represents the entire definedstream population (Strahler order 1 — 5) in the basin.

Results of Probabilistic Biosurvey, Green -Tradewater River BMU, 2006

28%

o Full Support

t Partial Support

~~ o Nonsupport60%

12%

Table 3.3.2-7. Comparison of probabilistic and targeted monitoring results for aquatic lifeuse in the Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU (Note: percentages rounded tonearest integer).Full Support Partial Support Nonsupport

Probability Target Probability Target Probability TargetMiles 2,607 1,389 1,109 657 5,728 607Percent 28 52 12 25 60 23

Integrated Surface and Groundwater Quality Assessment of Large Karst

Springs in the Green River Basin. The purpose of this project was to assess the nonpoint

source (NPS) impacts to groundwater in the Green — Tradewater River BMU, and to

111

integrate ground- and surface water quality information with biological data to better define

the nexus between the two flow systems. Groundwater and surface water are conjunctive

systems, no where more directly so than in karst terrain. Surface water assessments in the

well-developed karst terrain of the sinkhole plain are limited due to a lack of flowing

surface streams. Therefore, karst basins represent large unassessed areas of contribution to

the Green River basin. For example, Gorin Mill Spring, south of Munfordville, Kentucky,

contributes approximately 10 percent of the base flow of the Green River. Subsurface

conduits drain these karst basins that discharge to surface waters at discrete large springs.

This integrated surface water/groundwater assessment addresses the deficiency caused by

the lack of significant stream segments that can be assessed using conventional techniques.

This approach also provides needed information on spring conditions relative to NPS

impacts to both the surface water and groundwater programs.

To assess surface and groundwater, 10 kazst springs with significant discharge were

monitored monthly for one year (Table 3.3.2-8). Site selection was based on identifying

large, well-developed karst basins where perennial surface streams are limited, and where

large discrete springs dischazge the drainage of these basins to surface waters. Other site

selection criteria include accessibility and landowner cooperation. Additional

considerations include whether these sites would provide new data, will support other

programs (e. g., 305[b], TMDL, wellhead protection, etc.), and whether land use in the

basins represents nonpoint source pollutants of concern. The drainage areas for most karst

basins were previously identified. Additional groundwater tracer testing was conducted for

two un-delineated basins.

Table 3.3.2-9 shows the uses assessed for springs and the miles from those

assessments in the proper use support-level. The major cause (pollutants) found to exceed

water quality standards for assessed springs in the Green River basin for warm water

aquatic life use is "nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators" which accounts for 91

percent of causes. Primary contact recreation use assessment using E. coli as the indicator

found 95 percent of spring miles not supporting that use. Given the nature of springs

draining large, indeterminate watersheds, source of these causes are listed as "source

unknown" and will be identified in intensive watershed monitoring related to TMDL

112

development. Landowners or operators of these resources received copies of sample results

with explanatory letters and other relevant material.

Table 33.2-8. Springs monitored in the Green River basin during water-yeaz 2006-2007.~rin~ Name Countv Karst Basin

Area milBase Flow

Discharge (ft3/s)Gorin Mill Hart 152.4 24.0Graham Warren 122.3 19.8Lost River Rise Warren 58.8 12.4Nol Larue 56.4 4.6McCoy Hart 34.1 12.7Skees Karst Window Hardin 27.5 6.4Mahurin Grayson 25.3 2.1Head of Rou h River Hardin 17.3 2.8Goodman Hardin 14.7 4.6Mill Grayson 7.1 3.9

Table 3.3.2-9. Individual designated use support summary for springs in Kentucky, 2008.Designated Total in Total Supporting Not Size ofUse State Assessed Supporting ResourceWater Quality

Standards Notmiles miles Water ualityStandardsmiles Assessedmiles miles

Warm WaterAquatic 10.48 10.45 5.0 5.45 0.03HabitatFishConsum tion

10.48 0 0 0 10.48

PrimaryContact 10.48 9.95 0 9.95 0.53RecreationSecondaryContact 10.48 0 0 0 10.48RecreationDomesticWater Su 1

0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0

3.3.3 Ohio RiverORSANCO assessed uses in the 664 miles of the Ohio River main stem that forms

Kentucky's northern boundary and a summary of those findings are presented in the

ORSANCO 2008 305(b) report. No reaches of the Ohio River fully support all uses.

Drinking water and aquatic life use are fully supported in all river miles. Eighteen

113

segments along this reach were not fully supporting primary contact recreation use due to

pathogens. Of the 664 miles that form Kentucky's northern border, those 18 segments

represent 350 miles (53 percent) that did not fully support the use. This limited support was

often a result of combined sewer overflows (CSOs) during and immediately following

rainfall events in and downstream of urban areas. All miles of the Ohio River partially

supported the fish consumption use because of limited fish consumption advisories for

PCBs and dioxin.

3.3.4 Assessment Results of Lakes and Reservoirs: Focus on Upper Cumberland — 4-Riversand Green — Tradewater Rivers BMUsIntroduction. Since the initiation of the rotating basin approach in 1998, the

commonwealth's significant publicly-owned lakes and reservoirs are monitored over a five-

yeaz cycle instead of the previous seven- to eight-year cycle. During this two-year

reporting period, SO lakes and reservoirs were monitored (maps located in Appendix C) and

four were carry forward assessed reservoirs from 2000-01 water-years due to access

restrictions in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMU and Green — Tradewater BMU.

Designated uses in lakes consist of Warm Water Aquatic Habitat (WAH)

(sometimes in conjunction with Cold Water Aquatic Habitat (CAH) in lakes with a two-

story fishery) and Primary and Secondary Contact Recreation (PCR and SCR). Many

reservoirs also have a domestic water supply (DWS) use. Indicators monitored or sampled

for analysis to determine lake or reservoir health (water quality) may be found in Table

3.2.1-1.

3.3.4.1 Assessment of Trophic State and Use Support.

Trophic status was assessed in lakes by using the Carlson Trophic State Index (TSI)

for chlorophyll a. This method is convenient because it allows lakes to be ranked

numerically according to increasing eutrophy, and it also provides for a distinction between

oligotrophic, mesotrophic, eutrophic, and hyper-eutrophic lakes. The growing season

(April —October) average TSI value was used to rank each lake. Areas of lakes that

exhibited trophic gradients or embayment differences often were analyzed separately. Use

support in lakes was determined by criteria listed in Table 3.2.1-3.

114

3.3.4.2 Results

Statewide. Table 3.3.4.2-1 through 3.3.4.2-9 present statewide summaries of use

support, impairments (causes) and sources of impairments of reservoirs, ponds and lakes in

the state. The water quality assessment of lakes includes more than 95 percent of the

publicly-owned lakes, ponds and reservoirs acreage of Kentucky (Table 3.3.4.2-1).

Seventy-four of 1271akes, ponds and reservoirs (58 percent) fully support their uses, and 53

(42 percent) do not support one or more uses. On an acreage basis, approximately 73

percent (778,108 acres) of the 1,072,470 designated uses-assessed acres fully support uses,

and approximately 27 percent (294,362 designated use-acres) do not support one or more

uses (Table 3.3.4.2-1 — 3).

Table 3.3.4.2-1. Individual use support summary for Kentucky reservoirs.

Size FullySupportingUse

Total Size Size Fully Size Not Size NotSupporting AssessedSize Assessed but Supporting

ThreatenedWarm WaterAquatic 219,135 217,811 209,093 0 8,781 1,324HabitatCold WaterAquatic 2,410 2,410 2,410 0 0 0Habitat

FishConsumption

216,135 204,664 112,209 0 92,455 14,471

PrimaryContactRecreation

219,135 62,149 61,930 0 219156,986

WaterSecondaryContactRecreation

219,135 213 497 200 773 0 12,7245,638

WaterDomesticWater 194,217 192,692 191,031 0 1,661 1,525Su 1

115

Table 33.4.2-2. Individual use support summary for Kentucky lakes.

Size FullyTotal Size Size Fully Supporting Size Not Size NotUse

Assessed Supporting but Supporting AssessedSizeThreatened

Wane WaterAquatic 571 571 342 0 229 0HabitatFish

571 63 0 0 63Consum tion 508PrimaryContact

571 0 0 0 0571

RecreationWaterSecondaryContact

571 317 317 0 0Recreation 254Water

Table 3.3.4.2-3. Individual use support summary for Kentucky ponds.Size Fullv

Total Size Size Fully Supporting Size Not Size NotUseSize Assessed Supporting but Supporting Assessed

ThreatenedWarm WaterAquatic 4.8 0 0 0.0 4.8HabitatFish

4.8 4.8 3.3 0.0 1.5 0.0Consum tionPrimaryContact

4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RecreationWaterSecondaryContact

4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8RecreationWater

Methylmerctuy and mercury in fish tissue were the most frequently identified

pollutant, accounting for the most lake, pond and reservoir acres impacted (92,520 or

statistically 100 percent of acres not supporting fish consumption use) (Table 3.3.4.4 — 6).

Nutrients/eutrophication biological indicators and pH were the second and third most

frequent impairments. A list of those causes and sources is presented in Tables 3.3.4.2-7 —

116

9. Sources "unknown" were most commonly identified as it relates to impairments

affecting Kentucky's reservoirs and lakes; this related to the high frequency of mercury in

fish tissue and methylmercury identified as the primary pollutant. This pollutant enters

aquatic environments from multiple pathways. Ponds also had "unknown" as the most

common source (Table 3.3.4.2-9) due to methylmercury. A fish consumption advisory for

PCBs is in place on one reservoir of considerable size (Green River Lake), resulting in a

high percentage of lake acres impacted by priority organics (Table 3.3.4.2-4). Agricultural-

related sources, along with municipal point sources and septic systems, were the most

commonly identified sources related to nutrient impairments (Tables 3.3.4.2-7 and 8). The

indicator pH was the fourth most frequent "pollutant" with respects to reservoir and lake

impairment. The listing of pH for standards exceedence affects CAH, WAH and PCR and

SCR uses (Table 33.4.2-4). Dissolved oxygen was displaced to fifth most frequent

"pollutant" in these waters (Table 3.3.2-4 and 5). A related problem was the pollution-

indicator, dissolved gas super-saturation, which often occurs with excess nutrients during

daylight hours as photosynthesis from excess algae occurs. Naturally shallow lake or

reservoir basins, or those that have excessive sedimentation resulting in shallow basins,

often provide suitable habitat for the proliferation of nuisance aquatic weeds that impair

secondary contact recreation and account for the fifth highest cause of use nonsupport.

Natural conditions such as manganese releases from anoxic hypolimnetic water (deepest

water-layer in stratified reservoirs and lakes) and nutrients (resulting in high production of

aquatic macrophytes and plankton) in runoff from relatively undisturbed watersheds affect

domestic water supply and secondary contact uses, respectively. Suspended solids from

surface mining activities have decreased in severity as a source from previous years but

continue to impede full secondary contact recreation use in one eastern Kentucky reservoir

(Buckhorn Lake).

Trophic state was determined for the number of acres and lakes for the four possible

categories of TSI. For this presentation of data, a distinction between lakes (natural

waterbodies) and reservoirs (manmade lakes or impoundments) is made. Tables 3.3.4.2-10

and 11 present these results.

117

Table 3.3.4.2-4. Number of acres of Kentucky reservoirs, lakes and ponds affected byindividual causes ollutants).Cause Total Size

Meth lmerc 78,313Merc in Fish Tissue 14,142NutrientlEutrophication BiologicalIndicators 9,724

H 8,489Oxy en, Dissolved 8,388PCB in Fihs Tissue 8,210Dissolved Gas Su ersaturation 3,864Total Sus ended Solids (TSS 3,040Sedimentation/Siltation 2,417Organic Enrichment (Sewage) BiologicalIndicators 1,264

Taste and Odor 1,171A uatic lams macro h es) 711Chloro h 11-a 548Habitat Assessment Streams) 339Man anese 317Aquatic Algae 169Dissolved oxy en saturation 64Im airment Unknown 43

Table 3.3.4.2-5. Number of acres of Kentucky lakes (natural) affected by causes(pollutants).Cause Total Size

Oxy en, dissolved 229NutrientlEutrophication BiologicalIndicators 229

Methylmercury 36Merc in fish tissue 27

Table 3.3.4.2-6. Number of acres of Kentuck onds affected b cause ollutant).Cause Total Size

Meth lmerc 1.5

118

Table 3.3.4.2-7. Sources of causes (pollutant) to Kentucky reservoirs.Source Total Size

Atmos heric De osition - Toxics 68,888Source Unknown 43,470Upstream Source 12,724A riculture 9,151Industrial Point Source Dischar e 8,210Munici al Point Source Dischar es 6,129Surface Minin 4,270On-site Treatment Systems (SepticSystems and Similar DecentralizedSystems)

4,232

Livestock (Grazing or Feedin Operations) 3,356Internal Nutrient Rec clin 3,212Natural Sources 2,877Rural (Residential Areas) 317Littoral/shore Area Modifications (Non-riverine) 512

Impacts from Abandoned Mine LandsInactive 219

Uns ecified Urban Stormwater 170Non-irrigated Crop Production 169Crop Production (Cro Land or D Land 137Grazin in Ri arian or Shoreline Zones 99Habitat Modification -other thanH dromodification 99

Se to e Dis osal 98Golf Courses 78Streambank modifications/destabilization 37Post-develo ment erosion &sedimentation 37Contaminated Sediments 18

Table 3.3.4.2-8. Sources of causes (pollutant) to Kentucky lakes (natural).Source Total Size

Natural Sources 193A riculture 193Non-irri ated crop roduction 36Atmos heric de osition — toxics 36Rural residential areas) 36Source Unknown 27

119

Table 3.3.4.2-9. Source of cause ollutant) to Kentuck onds.Source Total Size

Source Unknown 1.5

Table 3.3.4.2-10. Tronhic state of reservoirs in KentuckyTro hic State Number of Lakes Total SizeOli otro hic 10 62,602Mesotro hic 30 23,161Eutrophic 54 131,705

H ereutro hic 1 317D stro hic 0 0

Table 3.3.4.2-11. Tronhic state of lakes in KentuckyTro hic Status Number of Lakes Total SizeOli otro hic 0 0Mesotro hic 0 0Eutro hic 9 308

H ereutro hic 3 263

Upper Cumberland River Basin. The fact that the majority of Kentucky's

oligotrophic (infertile, low primary production) reservoirs are located in this basin is

related to the geology of this mountainous and high plateau basin. Of the fully

supporting reservoirs in this basin, two are eutrophic, three are mesotrophic and one is

oligotrophic (Tables 3.3.4.2-12). In this basin, there were 11 reservoirs monitored or

evaluated (evaluated for DWS only), nine were fully supporting uses and three did not

support fully all uses (Table 3.3.4.2-12 — 14). Of reservoirs fully supporting uses, the

trend in trophic state is decreasing toward a less nutrient-enriched system on five

reservoirs, stable on two and increasing on two as compared to data from 2000. Of those

reservoirs less than full support of one or more uses, one reservoir is stable and another is

slightly increasing in trophic state (Table 3.3.4.2-12-14). Nutrient/eutrophication

biological indicators is the most common impairment affecting water quality conditions

in these reservoirs (Tables 3.3.4.2-13 and 14). Excess nutrients (phosphorus and

nitrogen) eventually result in depleted or lowered DO in the water column. Sources of

those impairments are listed in Tables 3.3.4.2-13 and 14.

120

Table 3.3.4.2-12. Upper Cumberland River Basin reservoirs that fully support assesseduses.

Eutro-Lake Acres County Trophic State ~hication Uses

TrendCannon 243 Bell Oligotrophic Stable C/WACreek H FC

SCRDWS

Cranks 219 Harlan Oligotrophic Increasing WAHCreek (de adin) SCRDale 4300 Clinton Oligotrophic Decreasing WAHHollow (improving) FCReservoir P/SCR

DWSLinville 273 Rockcastle Eutrophic Stable C/WA

H FCP/SCRDWS

Laurel 88 McCreary Mesotrophic Decreasing WAHCreek (degrading) FC

P/SCRDWS

Laurel 6060 Whitley & Oligotrophic Decreasing WAH,River Laurel (improving) CAH,

SCR,DWS

Martin's 334 Harlan Mesotrophic Decreasing C/WAFork (improving) H FC

P/SCRDWS

Tyner 87 Jackson Mesotrophic Increasing WAH(degrading) FC

P/SCRDWS

Wood 672 Laurel Oligotrophic Decreasing WAHCreek (improving) FC

P/SCRDWS

121

Tabl

e 3.3.4.2-13. Up

per Cu

mber

land

River basin reservoirs partially su

ppor

ting

ass

esse

d uses.

N N

Trophic St

ate

Impa

ired

~.T HZ

Use

Lake/Reservoir

Acre

sCoun

Caus

e (n

ollu

tant

~So

urce

Chenoa

37

Bell

Meso

trop

hic

SCR

Aquatic pl

ants

(mac

roph

ytes

)Po

st-d

evel

opme

nt erosion and

t~sedimentation, streambank mo

di-

(sta

ble)

fication/destabilization, s

hallow

l ake/reservoir basin

Cor

bin Ci

ty139

Laur

elMesotrophic

WAH

Chlo

roph

yll a,

Internal nut

rien

t re

cycl

ing,

(in

suff

icie

ntnu

trie

nUeu

trop

hica

tion

muni

cipa

l po

int source

trend da

ta)

biol

ogic

al indicators, organic

disc

harg

es, a

gric

ultu

reen

ri-chment (sewage) bi

olog

ical

indicators

Cum

berl

and

50,250

Pulaski,

Oligotrophic

FC

Methylmercury

Atmo

sphe

ric de

posi

tion

- tox

ics

Russell,

TWayne

(degrading)

aSymbols rep

rese

nt dec

reas

ing,

increasing or stable as it relates to trop

hic st

ate tr

end

Tab

le 3.3.4.2-14. Upper Cum

berl

and River basin re

serv

oirs

not sup

port

ing as

sess

ed uses.

Lake/Reservoir

Acre

sCoun

Trop

hic St

ate

Use

Impaired

Caus

e of Im

pairment

Sour

ce of Im

pairment

Cor

bin Ci

ty139

Laur

elMe

sotr

ophi

cDWS

Nutrient/eutrophication bi

olog

ical

Internal nutrient

(in

suff

icie

ntindicators, o

rgan

ic indicators (sewage)

recycling, mun

icip

al

trend da

ta)

biol

ogic

al indicators, ta

ste and odor

poin

t source dis

char

ges,

agri

cult

ure

4-Rivers Basins. There were lO lakes and reservoirs monitored in 2005. Of

those 10, six aze fully supporting assessed uses, four aze partially supporting assessed

uses and one is not supporting assessed uses (Tables 3.3.4.2-15 — 17). Of the fully

supporting lakes and reservoirs (in the 4-Rivers basins, five aze eutrophic and one is

mesotrophic (Tables 3.3.4.2-15). The trends in trophic state of all reservoirs that fully

support uses are increasing, with the exception of Blythe Lake (mesotrophic) as

compared to 2000 data (Table 3.3.4.2-15). The remaining lakes and reservoirs are less

than fully supporting all assessed uses (Tables 3.3.4.2-16 and 17). These lakes most

commonly are less than full support for SCR based on proliferation of aquatic

macrophytes over a substantial portion of open-water area. This can be attributed to

shallow basins in meso- to eutrophic trophic state. However, an important trend

concerning these lakes is that of decreasing trophic state in all but one, which had

insufficient data to make a trend determination (Tables 3.3.4.2-16 and 17).

Methylmercury and mercury (in fish tissue) are found to be at levels above criteria in

both lakes where fish flesh was analyzed for contaminants. Hematite Lake (reservoir)

has excess nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) that result in the depletion of adequate

DO in the water column through excess primary (phytoplankton) production; conversely,

the excess algal growth will result in super-saturation of DO during photosynthesis

(Table 3.3.4.2-17).

123

Tabl

e 3.3.4.2-15. 4-Rivers basins (l

ower

Cumberland, lo

wer Ohio, Mi

ssis

sipp

i and Ten

ness

ee river

s)lakes and res

ervo

irs that fu

lly sunnort as

sess

ed uses.

N

Lake

Acre

sCoun

Trophic

Eutrophication

Uses

Trend

State

Energy

370

Trigg

Eutrophic

Increasing

WAH, FC,

(degrading)

SCR

Bar

kley

45,500

Lyon

Eutrophic

Increasing

WAH, FC,

(de

grad

ing)

P/SCR,

DWS

Blythe

89

Christian

Meso

trop

hic

Decreasing

WAH, FC,

(improving)

SCR

Morris

170

Chri

stia

nEutrophic

Increasing

WAH,

(degrading)

P/SCR,

DWS

Tur

ner

61

Ball

ard

Eutrophic

Increasing

WAH, FC,

(degradin)

SCR

Ken

tcuk

y48

,100

Calloway

Eutrophic

Increasing

WAH, FC,

(degrading)

P/SCR,

DWS

Table 33.4.2-16. 4-R

iver

s ba

sins

(low

er Cum

berl

and,

lower Ohio, Mi

ssis

sipp

i and Ten

ness

ee ri vers) Kentucky River Basin lakes and

r ese

rvoi

rs that

arti

all

su

ort assessed uses.

r N

Trophic

Use

Lake

Acres

Coun

Stat

eImpaired

Cause of

Source of Im

pairment

C • T

• HZ

Impairment

Hem

atit

e90

Trigg

Meso

trop

hic

SCR

Aquatic plants

Litt

oraU

shor

e area

.~(macrophytes)

modi

fica

tion

s, na

tura

l(degrading)

sour

ces,

shallow

l ake

/res

ervo

ir basin

Honker

190

Lyon

Meso

trop

hic

SCR

Aquatic pl

ants

Litt

oraU

shor

e area

~.(macrophytes)

modi

fica

tion

s, na

tura

l(degrading)

sources, shallow

lake

/res

ervo

ir basin

Fis

h27

Ball

ard

Eutrophic

WAH,

Mercury in

fish

Source unknown

(in

suff

icie

ntFC, SCR

tissue

trend da

ta)

Met

ropo

lis

36

McCracken

Eutrophic

WAH,

Methylmercury,

Atmospheric

~,FC, SCR

diss

olve

d oxygen,

deposition, i

nter

nal

(degrading)

nutr

ient

/eut

ro-

nutr

ient

rec

ycli

ng,

p hication bi

olog

ical

non-

irri

gate

d crop

i ndi

cato

rsproduction, r

ural

(residential ar

ea),

shallow la

ke/r

eser

voir

basin

$Sym

bols

rep

rese

nt dec

reas

ing,

incr

easi

ng or st

able

as it

relates to trophic st

ate trend

Table 3.3.4.2-17. 4-Rivers basins (l

ower

Cumberland, lo

wer Ohio, Mississippi and Ten

ness

ee rivers) re

servoir not supporting

asse

ssed

uses.

Lake

Acres

Coun

Trophic State

Use Imp

aire

dCause of Im

pairment

Source of

I mpairment

~. , T, ~

Hematite

90

Trigg

Meso

trop

hic

WAH

Dissolved oxygen,

Source

.~nutrient/eutrophication

unknown

(im r

oving)

biological indicators

aSymbols represent decreasing, in

creasing or stable as it relates to trophic state trend

N O~

Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU. There were 29 reservoirs monitored in this

BMLT, the largest number of monitored publicly-owned reservoirs and lakes in the five

BMLJs. Twenty of those reservoirs are fully supporting their assessed uses (Table

3.3.4.2-18), and nine are partially supporting one or more assessed uses (Table 3.3.4.2-

19). Of those fully supporting reservoirs, 16 are eutrophic and four are mesotrophic;

there are no monitored oligotrophic reservoirs in this BMU (Tables 3.3.4.2-18). The trend

in trophic state of five reservoirs that fully support uses is increasing (degrading), nine

are stable and six are decreasing (improving) compazed to 2000 data (Table 3.3.4.2-15).

The remaining reservoirs (nine) are less than fully supporting all assessed uses (Tables

3.3.4.2-19). As a group, these lakes are less than full support for a variety of uses, and

indicate no recognized pollutant-trend on a BMU basis. Secondary contact recreation use

is impaired from a proliferation of aquatic macrophytes over a substantial portion of

open-water area sedimentation siltation and excess nutrients (Table 3.3.4.2-19). The

other most frequently impaired use is fish consumption due to mercury tainted fish flesh.

An important trend of note concerning the reservoirs in this BMU is that 20 of those

reservoirs monitored in this cycle have decreasing or stable (improving or holding steady)

trophic trend; whereas, six reservoirs are increasing (degrading) per trophic state (Tables

3.3.4.2-18 — 19). Those reservoirs with insufficient data to determine trophic state trend

were not monitored due to lack of access as of this monitoring cycle. Nutrients and

excessive sedimentation siltation are two pollutants of additional concern with these

reservoirs.

127

Table 33.4.2-18. Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU reservoirs that fully support allassessed uses.

EutrophicationTrendLake Acres Coun Tro hic State Uses

Barren River 10,000 Allen Eutrophic Increasing WAH, FC,(degrading) P/SCR, DWS

Briggs 19 Logan Eutrophic Decreasing WAH, FC, SCR(improving)

Freeman 160 Hardin Eutrophic Decreasing WAH, FC, SCR(improving)

Grapevine 50 Hopkins Mesotrophic Stable WAH, FC, SCR

Washburn 26 Ohio Eutrophic Decreasing WAH, FC, SCR(improving)

Liberty 79 Casey Mesotrophic Decreasing WAH, FC,(improving) SCR, DWS

Metcalfe County 22 Metcalfe Eutrophic Stable WAH, FC, SCR

Mill Creek 109 Monroe Eutrophic Increasing WAH, FC,(degrading) SCR, DWS

Nolin River 5,790 Grayson Eutrophic Stable WAH, FC,P/SCR, DWS

Salem 99 Larue Eutrophic Increasing WAH, FC,(degrading) SCR, DWS

Shanty Hollow 135 Warren Eutrophic Stable WAH, FC, SCR

Spurlington 36 Taylor Eutrophic Decreasing WAH, FC, SCR(improving)

Beshear 760 Caldwell Eutrophic Stable WAH, FC,P/SCR, DWS

Peewee 360 Hopkins Eutrophic Increasing WAH, FC,(degrading) SCR, DWS

Loch Mary 135 Hopkins Mesotrophic Stable WAH, FC,SCR, DWS

128

Table 3.3.4.2-18 (cont.). Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU reservoirs that fully support allassessed uses.

Lake Acres Coun Trophic State Eutrophication UsesTrend

Moffat 49 Union Eutrophic Stable WAH, FC, SCR

Pennyrile 47 Christian Mesotrophic Decreasing(im rovin )

WAH, FC, SCR

Kin fisher 30 Daviess Eutrophic Stable WAH, FC, SCRGeorge 53 Crittenden Eutrophic Increasing

(de adin)WAH, FC,SCR, DWS

Mauzy 84 Union Eutrophic Stable WAH, FC, SCR

129

Table 3.

3.4.

2-19

. Green — Tra

dewa

ter Rivers BMU reservoirs that par

tial

ly support assessed uses.

w 0

Trophic St

ate

Use

Lak

eAcres

Coun

Impairment

Caus

e of Im

pairment

Sour

ce of

(,. T, H~

Im a

irment

Campbellsville

63

Taylor

Eutrophic

SCR

Sedimentation/siltation, aquatic

Upst

ream

source,

CiTy

.~plants (m

acrophytes)

natu

ral sources

(im r

ovin )

Can

eyville City

75

Grayson

Eutr

ophi

cSCR, DWS

Sedimentation

silt

atio

n,Na

tura

l so

urce

s,(in

suff

icie

ntnutriendeutro-phication biological

shal

low

tren

d da

ta)

indicators

lake

/res

ervo

ir basin

Green Riv

er8,

210

Taylor

Eutrophic

FC

Merc

ury in fis

h tissue, PCB in fi

shIndustrial point

Hti

ssue

sour

ce dis

char

ge,

(st

able

)so

urce

unknown

Luz

erne

55

Muhl

enbe

rgMesotrophic

DWS

Nutriendeutrophicationbiological

Sour

ce unknown

(in

suff

icie

ntindicators

tren

d da

ta)

Mal

one

826

Logan

Eutr

ophi

cFC

Merc

ury in fis

h ti

ssue

Sour

ce unknown

H

(stable)

Rou

gh River

5,100

Hardin

Mesotrophic

FC

Merc

ury in fish ti

ssue

Source unknown

T(de

ad

ing)

Spa

240

Logan

Eutr

ophi

cSCR

Chlorophyll a,

Natural so

urce

s,H

(stable)

sedimentation/siltation, ha

bitat

assessment (l

akes

)ag

ricu

ltur

e

Car

pent

er64

Daviess

Eutr

ophi

cWAH

Dissolved ox

ygen

, di

ssol

ved ox

ygen

Upstream source,

H(stable)

satu

rati

on, n

utrient/eutrophication

biological ind

icat

ors

agri

cult

ure

Sce

nic

18He

nder

son

Eutrophic

WAH

Nutr

ient

leut

roph

icat

ion biological

Contaminated

(insufficient

indicators

sedi

ment

s, in

ternal

tren

d da

ta)

recycling

aSymbols represent decreasing, in

creasing or st

able

as it

relates to tro

phic

state trend

Literature Cited

Aroner, E. R. 1993. (WQHYDRO) Water quality/hydrology graphics/analysis system.Portland, Oregon 97218.

Branson, B. A. and D. L. Batch. 1972. Effects of strip-mining on small-stream fishes in east-central Kentucky. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 84(59): 507-518.

Gilbert, R. O. 1987. Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. VanNostrand Reinhold Company, Inc. New York, NY 10003.

Howard, H. S., B.Berrang, M. Flexner, G. Pond and S. Call. 2000. Kentucky mountaintopmining benthic macroinvertebrate survey. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Scienceand Ecosystem Support Division, Ecological Assessment Branch, Athens, GA.

Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. L. Angermeier, P. R. Yant and I. J. Schlosser. 1986.Assessment of biological integrity in running waters: A method and its rational.Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv. Spec. Publ. 5.

Kentucky Division of Water. 2006. Methods of assessing biological integrity of surfacewaters in Kentucky (Draft). Frankfort, Kentucky.

Kentucky Divioson of Water. 2006. 2006 Integrated Report to congress on water qualityin Kentucky. Frankfort, Kentucky.

_ 2005. Kentucky ambient/watershed water quality monitoring standard operatingprocedure manual. Frankfort, Kentucky.

. 2004. 2004 Kentucky report to congress on water quality. Frankfort, Kentucky.

ORSANCO. 2008. 2008 Biennial Assessment of Ohio Rver water quality conditions(draft). Cincinnati, Ohio.

Pond, G. J. 2004. Effects of surface mining and residential land use on headwater streambiotic integrity in the eastern Kentucky coalfield region. Frankfort, Kentucky.

and S. E. McMurray. 2002. A macroinvertebrate bioassessment index for headwaterstreams in the eastern Kentucky coalfield region, Kentucky. Kentucky Division of Water.Frankfort, Kentucky.

Taylor, J. K. 1987. Quality assurance of chemical measurements. Lewis Publishers, Inc.Chelsea, MI 48118.

The Kentucky Environmental Commission. 1995. The state of Kentucky's environment:1994 status report. Frankfort, Kentucky.

131

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Wadeable streams assessment: a collaborativesurvey of the nation's streams EPA 841-B-06-002. Washington, D.C.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Guidance for 2006 assessment, listing andreporting requirements pursuant to sections 303(d), 305(b) and 314 of the clean wateract. Office of Water, Washington, D.C.

1997. Guidelines for prepazation of the comprehensive state water qualityassessments (305(b) Reports and electronic updates. Office of Water, Washington,D.C.

132

Appendix A. 305(b) Statewide Assessment Resultsfor Kentucky through 2008 305(b) Cycle

A

305(b)

meni Rssult~, 2008

a i ~...

IKbbott CINk 0.0 to

3.2

ArNanta Crs~k 0.0 to

3.6

ArtwldFork O.Olo2.8

__

BrnNb CnMc 0.0 W 1.8

_

B' S

River

B

River

B

RW~r

B

Rfwr

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

5070203

5 070203

5070203

5 070203

FLOYD

FLOYD

KNOTT

JOHNSON

5B-NS

5-NS

SNS

5-PS

SB-NS

3 3 3

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

7/3 0/2004

1 y10~2003

12/1Q2003

7 Kil2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH fC PCR SCR

Bwr Cn~k 0.0 to

1.9

__

B ~~wr Cn~k 0.0 b 7.1

B' 3

River

Bip Sandy River

5070204

5 070203

LAWRENCE

FLOYD

5 -PS

5-PS

5-NS

S~NS

3 33 3 3 3

3 31120/2003

102112004

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

B Crssk

O.O l0 7.9

BI Sin

River

RIVER

RIVER

5070201

PIKE

___

B Ctwk 10J l0 75.1

B S

River

5070201

PIKE

2-FS

SPS

5-NS 3

3 33

1/78/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

3N2512003

WAH FC PCR 8CR

e Cnelc 7.31010.7

_8 MME Cn~k 1.4 to 3.9

B

River

B

River

RIVER

RIVER

5070201

5 070203

PIKE

A AACiOFFIN

5-pS

5-PS

35-PS

3&PS

3 33 3

11/27/2003

1/27~IOW

WAH FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

B' Mk» Cr~eft S.B l0 8.

48 S

River

RNER

5070203

MAGOFFIN

5-PS

33

33

11/1020D3

WAH FC PCR SCR

B

River 0.0 to 27.1

B

Rlv~r

RNER

5070204

BOYD

5-PS

2-FS

32-FS

312020W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bill

D &arxh 0.0 to

1.1

B S

River

RIVER

5070203

KNO1T

5-NS

33

33

1211 W2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

BI

Creek

1.2 t

o 5.8

B

River

RNER

SD70201

PIKE

2-FS

33

33

7/3011004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bl~k~s Creek 35A ro 40.8

_BI Sind River

RIVER

5070204

LAWRENCE

2-FS

5-N3

33

31f202004

WAH FC PCR SCR

BINn~Chsk 41.6 to 43.0

B Sa

RivK

RNER

5070204

LAWRENCE

5-PS

33

33

11x252002

WAH FC PCR SCR

BINr~ Cn~k M.0 ro

48A

8

Rtvsr

RNER

_5070204

LAWRENCE

5-NS

5-NS

&NS

33

2H4/2004

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Blaine Crt~k

8.7 to 77.4

B

Rlwr

RNER

5070204

LAWRENCE

5-NS

2-FS

33

317/738003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork 0.0 to 10.0

BI S

River

RIVER

5070203

PIKE

5-NS

33

33

7J30/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buds&arxh O.Ol02.8

8

River

RNER _

5070203

FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

121102003

WAH FC PCR SCR

BulfaloCrsNt O.Oto1.8

B'

River

_ RIVER

___

RNER

_5070203

_FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

7f30l2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

C~Nb For1c 0.0 to

1.2

B

River

5070203

FLOYD

SNS

33

3.3

1?/10I20D3

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Fork O.Olo7.5

B 8

Rfwr

RNER

5070203

IWOTT

_2-FS

33

33

12H0I2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cat Fork

O.O to 8.7

_____

__

B'

Rfwr

RIVER

5070204

~LAVYRENCE

2 -FS

33

33

2N2/20W

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

CNu CrNk 0.0 W ~.9

_8

River

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

12/10/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Co1dwN~rfork

2.1 to 8.8

B

River

RIVER

5070201

MARTIN

5-PS

33

33

11H7/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Dews Lru

B

River

RESERVOIR

5070203

FLOYD

2 -FS

35-PS

33

31512003

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Cn~k 0.0 to

/.0

B

River

RNER

5070203

IWOTT

5-PS

33

33

14N02003

CAH FC PCR SCR

Elkhorn Crwk 0.0 to

10.8

B

Rivx

RIVER

5070202

PIKE

5 -PS

5-NS

33

31f20/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

FI

R~~ervok

B S

Rlwr

RESERVOIR

5070202

Ptl~

2-FS

32-

FS2-

FS3

3I5R002.7 /3 7 120 0 8

WAH FC PCR SCR

Frawn Cn~k 0.0 to

5.2

B S

River

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

BPS

33

..3'

312110@003

WAH FC PC ' 3CFi

Creak O.Ol00.9

Bi S

RN~r

RNER

RNER

5070203

LAWRENCE

5-PS

33

33

7f3W20W

WAH FC PC 3CR

Cn~k 0.9 ro

8.5

Bf S

River

5070203

JOHNSON

2-FS

33

33

11/17/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Goo~~ Crs~k O.D to 2.2

_B S

Rhnr

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

5-N8

33

33

12H

WAH FC PCR SCR

OrN~ Creek 0.0 to 4.8

B

River

RNER

5070203

JOHNSON

5~P3

33

33

7/30/20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Grif

fin Cn~k OA to 2

.5B S

River

RIVER

5070203

LAWRENCE

2-Ffi

33

33

7/30/2004

CAH FC PCR 8CR

Hobby Fork 0.0 t

o 2.0

B S

River

RNER

5070207

MARTIN

2-FS

33

33

1127/1004

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Hobbs Fork 2.0 t

o 3.8

B

Rlv~r

RIVER

5070201

MARTIN

2-FS

33

33

1121/2003

W/tH FC PCR SCR

Hood Cnslc OA ro 3.8

B

River

RNER

5070204

LAWRENCE

5-pS

33

33

1rz7/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hood Croak

3.8 m 5.4

8 S

Rlwr

RNER

5070204

LAWRENCE

2 -FS

33

33

11@1f2003

WAH FC PC SCR

la Dim Cn~k 0.0 to

0.4

B

Rfwr

RNER

5070204

BOYD

SN8

33

33

14/102003

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

la Drn Cask 0.410 2.4

B S

River

RNER

5070204

BOYD

5-NS

33

33

1211 W2003

WAH FC PC 3CR

Indian CrNlc O.O la 3.5

BI

River

RIVER

5070202

PIKE

5-PS

33

33

11N3/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Islr~d Cn~k 0.0 to

1.7

8 3

River

RNER

5070203

PIKE

5-PS

33

33

112012003

WAH, FC, PCR, BC

FtJake CreekO.Ol04.4

B

River

RNER

5070203

FLOYp

S-NS

33

33

1Z/102003

WAH FC PCR SCR

J Cn~k 5.31010.8

8 S

Rfwr

RIVER

5070203

JOHNSON

5-NS

33

33

8/SI2W3

WAH FC PCR SCR

Johns&rieh O

.Olo.1.8

B

River

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

12HOr2W3

WAli FC PCR SCR

Johrn Croak

O.O l0 5.8

B

RivK

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

8/3f2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

JoFxu Cn~k 2~.0 b 30.7 -~-~---

---

B 3

River

RNER

_ RIVER

RNER

RNER

5070203

PIKE _

-- -

5-PS

5-NS

32-F8

__3

1r11/20W

WAH FC. PCR $CR

JoFxw Creak 34.41042.5

B

RhrK

5070203 __

_._

PIKE

______

PIKE

5-NS

2-FS

3 33_3

3 ~

3 '

11rzOrz003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

_ ___

JoMwn &~nclt 0.0 t

o 0.9

.B

River

_5070202

39

70127@003

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Jon~~ Fork O.O l0 9

.4B

Rlwr

50702D3

IWOTT

5-PS

33

33

12/10/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

KrwxCn~k O.Oto7.9

B

River

RIVER

RNER

5070207

PIKE

5-PS

5-PS

32 -FS .

_._

38Id12004-1/31x2008

WAH FC PCR 3CR

LNt Fork BMwr Cnelt 0.0 ro

11.4

8

River

5070203

FLOYD

5-PS

33

~

33

12HQI2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Left Fa

r1c Bwwr Creek 73.6 m 18.7

~ ~

B

Rives

RIVER

W70203

FLOYD

5-PS

33

33

11H7/1003

WAli FC PCR SCR

LNCFork Bl~ins Creak 0.0 to

2.1

8 S

Rhtit

RNER

5070204

LAWRENCE

5-N3

5-NS

5-NS

33

1@7@OW

WAH FC PCR SCR

tMl Fork Middy Crnk 0.0 to

8.4

B S

River

RNER

3070203

FLOYD

5-NS

5-NS

SNS

33

4/312004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Levlw Fork O.OIo 5.B

B

River

RNER

5070203

LAWRENCE

2~FS

2-FS

33

2-FS

11272004

WAH FC PCR SCR

I.~vfN Fak 118.010121.,

B

Rive

►R

NER

5070

202

PIKE

SN

S5-

PS3

33

N1/

1~E

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LwiN

Fork

5.8

to 15

.3B

KW~r

RIVE

R50

7020

3LA

WRE

NCE

5 -PS

2-FS

35-

PS3

1M2/

2004

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

Lwiu

For

k 15.

3 M 38

.9B

Rive

rR

NER

5070

203

LAW

RENC

E2-

FS2-

FS3

31/

2520

08W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R

305(b) Assessment Resulla, 2008

a N

~Water Body Tvn

~gypty

Muu Deb

p~Nanat~d Uses

Lwiu Fork 65.2 to

99.9 __

__ B

iy Sandy River

RIVER

~ RNER

~_ ~

.RNER . - -

~~ 5070203

JOHNSON

2 -FS

SN8

33

2-FS

18512008

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

Little CM Fak 1

.1 to 3.7

__

_ -- ~--

- Bip Sandy Rhnr

5070204

LAWRENCE

2 -FS

~3

3~

3

Y3

11nOrzoo3

WAH FC PCR SCR

L iftN P~k1t CnNt 3.2 to

8.4

_B 3

Riwr

- .5070203

JOHNSON --

--- Sp$---

3 --

3_ -_ 3

~.-

3---1120/2003

---

WAH FC PCR SCR - --

Lxtl~ Pskx Cn.k BA ro 11

.e _ __

BI

RNr.r

~~ RNER

~~~ 5Wa203

JOHNSON

FLOYD

PIKE

5-PS

5-NS

~ 2-FS

5-N35-NS

~~ ~ 3

~3 3

32/13rzOW

WAH FC PCR SCR

L Branch 0.0 W 2.0

LowK Elk Fork 0.410 2.4

_...___

B'

River

B

Rive

RIVER

RIVER

5070203

5 070201

3 33 3

3 311/17/2003

11H7I2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

LCww Lard Fork 0.0107.9

___ __

B 3

Rfwr

RIVER

SW0204

LAWRENCE

SPS

33

33

2/13/20W

WAM FC PCR SCR

Lows P

&rich 0.8 to 1.9

B S

R{v~r

RIVER

5070202

PIKE

2f'8

33

33

10/27/2003

WAM FC PCR SCR

M~rtowbon~ Cn~k 1.4 to 11.3

Bi S

Rivx

R5070202

PII~

5-p3

33

33

11H3/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

M~Rin

Lake

B

Rfvx

RESERVOIR

5070201

AAARTIN

2-FS

33

33

1/1/7988

WAH FC PCR SCR

Middle Croak

O.O to ~.5

81 Sued Rivx

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

5-P$

33

33

8l3l200~1

WAH FC PCR SCR

Middle Fork Rodcastl~ Cask OA to 18.8

Bi S

Rfv~r

RIVER

5070201

MARTIN

5-P$

33

33

1125f2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Miller C

rs~k 0.0 to

6.4

BI S

Rlvsr

RNER

5070203

JOHNSON

5-N8

33

33

11/12/2003

CAH, FC PCR SCR

Mud Crs~k 0.0 to

2.7

B

River

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

4H3l2004

WAH FC PCR, SCR

N~ Cnsk 0.0 W 3.1

Bi SrW River

RNER

5070203

LAWRENCE

5-PS

33

33

al3J2004

WAH, FC PCR SCR DWS

Fork e.~ to 71.3

_ __ _

___

B S

River

RNER

5070203

MORC,AN

5 -PS

5-NS

5 -NS

33

7/15!2004

WAN, FC, PCR, SCR

Otter CrNk 0.0 to 0.5

__

_BI

Rfv~r

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

5 -NS

33

33

12/10@003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

P~ddls Creek 0.0 to 1.4

B S

Rfwt

_ RIVER

RIVER

5070204

BOYD

JOHNSON

5-NS

5-NS

33

33 3

12/10/2003

11h3/2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

P~Mt Crs~k 0.0 to 7.9

B S

River

5070203

5-NS

33

P~kitavilk R~urvoir

B

River

RESERVOIR

_ RIVER

__ _

5070203

JOHNSON

2-FS

33

5-PS

~

33

~ 3

3/52003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

PvMh~r Fork 0.0 to 3.72

B S

River

507

MARTIN

S~PS

33

11Q5I2003

CAH FC PCR SCR

P~brCre~k O.OIo5.8

_

__

B

River

RIVER

5070201

PII~

'S -NS

~3

33 ~

38/ 3120W

WAH FC PCR,SCR

P

Fork O.O!01.3

B

Rlwr

RINER

5070201

AAARTIN

5-N8

33

33

8/3/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pond Cn~k 3.4 To 9.7

B

Rtvx

RIVER

5070201

PIKE

5-PS

33

33

11/772003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Praur Creek 0.0 to

4.B

B

River

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

2 -FS

33

33

2H8/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pund~on &inch 0.0 to 3.8

__

B S

RNnr

RIVER

5070203

KNOTT

5-PS

33

33

12l1011W3

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Raaoon CrNk 5.8 to 7.4

B 3

River

RIVER

5070203

PIKE

5-P$

33

33

11/17/2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

R

Fork Bwwr C~k 0.0 to 17.4

____

_B S

River

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

5-PS

5 -NS

fi-N8

33

11H312003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

R

Fork B~w~r CnMc 30.3 to 33.4

__8'

River

RNER _

5070203

KNOTT

5-PS

33

_3

311H7/1003

_WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Roblrxon CroNt 0.0 to 2.7

B Sind River

RIVER

5070202

PIKE

2-FS

33

33

9/148002

_WAH, FC, PCR SCR

Rods Fork O

.O ro 7.0

Rodcc~~d~ Cnelc 0.010 3.7

_ ~` _

B S

R(wr

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

5-PS

33

33

12H0l2003

WAH fC PCR SCR

Bip Sandy River

_ RIVER

5070201

.LAWRENCE

AAARTIN

5-PS

5-N3

2-FS

3

~3 3

_ _ 3 3

311/20/2003

WAH, FC, PCR; SCR

_RodccaNls Cn~k 13.25 to 15.3

~Biy Sridy River

Bip Sandy R

iver

_ _. RIVER

_RNER ~

5070201

3 3 3

_._

8fd12004

7 /1U20W

11/12/2003

_ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

_Rodccutl~ Cn~k 3.7 to 13.25

~5070201

~ ~ 5070201

_MARTIN

~~

MARTIN

5-PS

5-PS

~3 3

3 3

__2 -FS

3Rockhouss Fork 0.0 to 8.3

8 S

Rlv~r

RIVER

Rutull Fork 0.0 to

4.2

Bip Sxidy Rhnr

RIVER

5070202

PIKE

2-FS

5-NS

33

31l18120W

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR, DWS

Russell Fak 12.9 to 18.0

B S

Rfwr

RIVER

507D202

PIKE

~~ 3

33

32-FS

1H52004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ru~ull Fork 8.2 to

9.2

B S

Rlwr

RIVER

5070202

PIKE

2 -FS

33

33

11f25/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sdb

&rwh 0.0 to 1.8

B

Rlv~r

RIVER

5070203

KNOTT

5-PS

33

33

12/10/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Salt L

ick CnNc OA to B.B

B

River

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

SP$

33

33

12H 0!2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

ShN Cn~k O.Ow8.1

B

Rfwr

RNER

5070202

PIKE

S~P8

2-F5

33

311RSJ2003

WAH FC PC SCR

S

Cn~k 8.1 to 73.3

B S

RivK

RIVER

5070202

PIKE

5-PS

33

33

8I1M2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

S

Bnneh O.OIo f.8

B S

Rlwr

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

S-PS

33

33

12/10/2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

___._

Siz~rt~w~ Bench 0.0 to

2.0

B' 3

R{wr

RfVER

5070203

FLOYD

SNS

33

33

12/7012003

WAH FC PCR SCR

S

C

Breech 0.0 to

3.1

BI 3

River

RIVER

_5070203

FLOYD

b -NS

SNS

5-N8

33

2/872004

WAH FC PCR SCR

_StNI~ Croak 0.0 to 2.4

B Sind River

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

5-N6

33

33

12H2f2003

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

S

Burch 0.0 to 2.6

Bi S

River

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

518

33

33

12HO/2003

_WAH FC PCR SCR OWS

_S

&inch 0.0 to above 1.1

B S

River

RIVER

5070203

JOHNSON

33

33

3WAH FC PC SCR

Toms &~neh O.O!01.8

B'

River

RNER

5070202

PIKE

2-F8

33

33

10127@003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Tam CrsNc O.O l0 8.0

B

River

RNER

5070203

JOHNSON

SPS

~3

3__._

__ __

3

__~ 3

_ _ SI312004

._WAH FC PCR, SCR

T

Fork 0,0 fo

10.2

B

Rfv~r

RIVER

5070201

LAWRENCE

2-FS

2-FS

33

31R0120W

WAH FC PCR SCR

T

Fork 71.91077.7

B

River

RIVER

5070201

AAARTIN

2-FS

33

5-PS

311/25/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

T

Fork 78.25 to

84.E

B S

River

RIVER

5070207

PIKE

2-FS

5 -NS

33

31/20/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

T

Fork 10.2!041.8

B' S

River

RIVER

SD70201

AAARTIN

2 -FS

5-NS

33

31!20!1004

WAH FC PC 3CR

Turks Cn~k 0.0 to

5.9

8

River

RIVER

5070203

FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

12/1Df2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

p

Bnndi 0.0 l0 2.1

B S

Rivx

RNER

5070202

PIKE

5-NS

33

33

tOft7IZ003

CAH FC PCR SCR

VVhlbi Cnelc 0.8 to

3.5

B

Rivx

RNER

5070204

BOYD

2-FS

33

33

9f22R003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wihon Croak 0.0 to 2.9

BI Sind River

RNER

5070203

FLOYD

5-NS

33

33

12/10/2003

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Wolf Creek 0.0 to

8.5

B Sind River

RNER

5070201

MARTIN

5-PS

5-NS

33

31H82004

WAH FC PCR SCR

WoH Cn~k 17.8 to Z0.5

8 S

Rive

RNER

5070207

MARTIN

SPS

33

33

11/25/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wolf Cmk 6:5 to 17.8

B SarW River

RIVER

50702D1

MARTIN

5-NS

33

33

17

CAH FE PCR SCR

305(b)!

nent Rewlt~, 2008

a i W

W

Bench 0.0 W 1.7

Y~tnvilU R~s~rwk

Adams Fork 0.0 to 4.8

AdMni Fak 8.910 9.

8NaxrWsr Cn~k O.O l0 3.8

Abxander Cnelc 3.8 t

o 7.1

Awtin CENlt 2.8 W 3.8

-

B

River

a

River

(irs~n Rivx

C Ktsn River

Oro~n River

CxNn River

Grem RiV~r

RNER

RESERVOIR

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

6070202

5070204

5110004

5110004

5710001

5110001

5110003

PIKE

L AWRENCE

OHIO

OHIO

EDMONSON

EDMONSON

L OGAN

5-NS

2 -FS

5 -PS

2 -FS

2 -FS

2 -FS

SPS

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

11N7I2003

3 1512003

3H/2003

3Hl2003

11H212002

1 1112/2002

3N12003

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAFT FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH PC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Bacon C~k 0.210 77.2

_Gresn River

RIVER

5110001

HART

2 -FS

5-NS

32 -FS

33HI2003 -1025/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

BKan Creek 27.1 to 32.8

___

__ Grwn River

RIVER

5710001

HART

2-FS

5 -NS

33

33H2O03

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

B~can CtNk 17.2 f

o 27.1

Grwn River

RIVER __

5710001

HART

_5-PS

5 -NS

3- ---- 3 -- _

.-.

33

2/2el2003

WAH FCLPCR, SCR

B~caf Cn~k 32.B l0 33.5

__

(3n~n River

RIVER

RIVER

5110001

LARUE

58-NS

SB-NS

33

_1 0/2912007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bart»tt CrNk O

.D to 3.5

GrNn River

5110004

OHIO

2 -FS

33

33

3H/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Belt Cn~k 3.5 to

70.4

__

GrNn Rlvx

RIVER

_~ 5

710004

OHIO

2-FS

33

33

1012912007

WAH FC PCR SCR

B~r~n RWK 0.0 to

0.4

_ _

Grssn RWsr

__

RIVER

5110002

BUTLER

2 -FS

2 -FS

2 -FS

33

7/M2008

W11H FC PCR SCR

BaR~n RIvN 1W.910 119.4

GrNn River

RIVER

5110002

ALLEN

2 -FS

5-NS

SNS

33

1/~12D06

WAH FC PCR SCR

Barnrl River 29.8 M 35.0

Gn~n Rfva

RNER

5110002

WARREN

32-FS

33

33HI2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

B~rr~n River 35.0 to

44.0

Gn~n Rfwr

RNER

5110002

WARREN

32-FS

33

2 -FS

311/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bmn Rivet 0.4 W 15.1

Gran River

RNER

5110002

WARREN

2-FS

33

33

3J1R003

wAH FC PCR SCR

Barn Rhr~r 78.9 to 79.9

Cx~en R{wr

RIVER

5110002

ALLEN

2 -FS

33

33

10!19!2006

WAH FC PCR SCR DW3

Bran River R~wrvoir

Orson River

RE3ERVOIR

5110002

ALLEN

2 -FS

32-

FS28 5

3112812008

WAH C PCR SCR

Br»n Run 0.0 to

8.1

Green River

RNER

5110007

LARUE

2 -FS

33

33

3/1/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bat Eut Cask 3.410 7.5

Grs~n R(v~r

RNER

5110003

AAUHLENBERG

5-PS

33

33

12/17/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bit Eut Creek O.O l0 3.3

Green River

RNER

5110003

MUHLENBERG

5-PS

~2-FS

33

312M7

WAH FC PCR SCR

FoAc of Borten River 8

.2 to

15.5

__ __

C~rs~n River

RIVER

5710002

•ALLEN

5-PS

33

33

10/1/2007

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

_Bwr Crs~k 1

4.7 to 22.+

Green Rive

r_

RIVER

5110001

EDMONSON

SNS

~3

3_

33

2/2812003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bw Cnsk 22.4 t

o 30.8

Green River

RIVER

5110001

~GRAYSON

S~PS

2~F3

~~ ~ 2 -FS

32 -

FS32-

FS~ __

3 3

33!112003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Bw Cnsk 8.051012.7

Green Rivx

__ _ ..

RIVER

5170001

EDMONSON

31@212008

WAH, FG, PCR, SCR

BNwr Crs~k 18.2 l0 28.6

Grs~n Rivar

RIVER

RIVER

5110002

BARREN ~

33

32-

FS3/12003

WAH FC PCR SCR

B~wx Cn~k 8.5 to

15.5

GrNn RNr~r

b170002

BARREN

2 -FS

5-NS

33

31/18/2009

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bsw~rd~m CnNt 0.

0 to 14.5

(ire~n River

RIVER

5110001

EDMONSON

2 -FS

33

33

17H2/1002

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Beech Crs~k OA to 3.9

Green River

RIVER

5110003

MUHLENBERG

4A -NS

IA-NS4A-NS

33

2H12008

WAH FC PCR SCR

B Brush Crssk 0.0 b 5.0

(irNn Rivx

RNER

5110001

GREEN

5-PS

SNS

2-FS

33

102912007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

8 &u~tt C~ek 13.0 f

o 17.4

Cxs~n RIvK

RIVER

5110001

f3REEN

2 -FS

33

33

tOf27RW7

WAH FC PCR SCR

8

Bn»t~ Crs~k 5.O l0 7.

1Gr+~n River

RIVER

5110001

GREEN

32-

FS2-FS

33

11/178007

WAH FC PCR SCR

B Bnuh Cn~k 7.

7 to 13.0

Cinen Rlwr

RIVER

5110001

GREEN

35 -NS

2-FS

33

1127/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

B Cn~k 3.9 ro

9.2

C,non River

RIVER

5110001

ADAIR

5-PS

&PS

SPS

33

3H/2003 -10!3012007

WAH FC PCR SCR

BI

PiUrwn Cn~k 0.0 to

73.9

Cxesn River

RIVER

5110001

GREEN

2-FS

2B 5

2B 5

33

1 W30f2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

B

P"dman Cn~k 27.5 to 32.8

(3ro~n River

RIVER

5110001

TAYLOR

5-PS

33

33

3/18003

WAH FC PCR, SCR

B

Pifm~n Cn~k 13.9 M 17.8

Grwn River

RNER

5110007

GREEN

35-PS

2-FS

33

10/30/2007

WAFF FC PCR SCR

B PWn~n CnNc 17A to 23.85

Carson Rlwr

RIVER

5110001

TAYLOR

35-NS

2-FS

33

70!3012007

WAH FC PCR SCR

B R

Creek 7.2 to 12.E

Grssn River

RIVER

5110001

BUTLER

5-PS

5-NS

33

__

33N2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bil

Crs~k 0.0 ro

4.8

Gn~n River

RIVER

5710001

HARDIN

_SPS

5-NS

3_2-FS

33HlZ003 -10~0~2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Black 3n~k~ Breech 7.8 to 2.9

Grssn RWer

RIVER

5110D01

TAYLOR

5-PS

33

33

1 W3012007

WAH FC PCR CR

Bladclldt Cnslc 11.3 W 12.3

Gran Rfwr

RIVER

5710002

LOGAN

58 -NS

33

33

1N5/2004

WAH FC PC SCR

BrNr CnNc OA to 4

.8f3ra~n Rfvsr

RIVER

5110006

MUHLENBERG

4A-NS

4A-NS4A-NS

33

3Hr2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

~OnenRiwr

RESERVOIR

5110003

LOGAN

2-FS

32-

FS3

371/742008-11HI/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bnnh Crs~k 0.010 8.

7Gn~n Rlvsr

RATER

5110001

CASEY

5-PS

33

33

70130!2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bnuh Cn~k 0.0 to

2.15

Green River

RNER

5710001

GREEN

35-PS

2-FS

33

101308007

WAH FC PCR SCR

8rwh Fork O.O !04.4

Green Rivx

RIVER

5110005

McLEAN

5 -NS

SNS

5-NS

33

1YH7R002

W/W FC PCR SCR

Pond Cn~k 1.4 to

B.0

Orson River

RIVER

5110004

BUTLER

2•FS

33

33

10/3012007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buck CnNt 0.0 to

8.0

Green River

RIVER

5110005

McLEAN

5-PS

5-NS

33

33HI2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buds Cnsk 1.9 W 8.1

C3rssn RNror

RNER

5170008

CHRIST44N

5-P3

2 -FS

33

33!1/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buds Fork 13.0 to 19.3

Gin RNer

RIVER

5110008

CHRISTIAN

5-PS

5-NS

33

33/1/2D03

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Buds Fork 0.0 to

5.8

Grs~n River

RIVER

5170008

TODD

5-PS ~

33

33

10131/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

&rrntt Fork OA W 1.3

C,rs~n River

RIVER

5110005

DAVIESS

5-PS

33.~~ 3 --

312H7r2002

WAH, FC, PCR, 3CR

Bu11~r F

ork 2.3104.0

-----------

C~rNn River

RNER

5110001

51100D7

ADNR

^CASEY

5-NS

5-NS- 2 -FS

- -- 3

3-- 70~12W7

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Calhoun C~k 0.0 to

2.8 ---- ----

C

Isvill~ C R~wnoir

Cx~en River

RNER

5-PS

2 -FS

- •- SPS -

3 3 3

35-PS

3

3 _3 ~ -

- -

3

~-

- - 3 .-

3 3 ~

3/1@003

_WAH, FC PCR, SCR _

Grssn River

RESERVOI

RRNER - -

5110001

-• 5110005

~ 5110001

TAYLOR

--~

11/13Q008

~WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

CaM Rug O.O ►0

3.7

---~

-- -• - -•

--C~

Run

0.8

to B

.5 -~

- ~

..~

~ ~

- -- •--

~~

R'iw

rDA

VIES

S-

312

/17/

2002

WAH

, FC

PC

SCR

~~ R

hhr

- ..- R

IVER

_ .

~ RI

VER

~-- H

ART

2-FS

33

39/

t~f2

007

WAH

FC

PCR,

SCR

Cane

y CnN

c O.

O l0

3.d

Grs

sn R

iver

~51

1000

3M

UHLE

NBER

OS

33

312

H7@

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

305(b) Aaseesment Re

iuil

a, 2008

a

Basln

I YVat~r Bodv Tvo~

OHIO

OHIO

2-FS

3 3

2-FS

2 -FS

2 -FS

3 3 3--3 -

3 3 ~

~3

J

3~~

- ~- 3

•-- ~- --3

•- -

--~

.----- 3--' --•

~ 3 3

3 311

23!2

008

3lt/2oo3

Q~alanat~d Uses

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

wai, FC, PCR, SCR

C~ Crs~k 0.0

to 8,7

__

C

CnNc 13.1 to

17.0

_ ____ _ _ _ __ _

C

CrNk 1.4105.3

___~

~_,_

r--------

_Green Rl

v~r

RIVER

Green Rivx ~ RNER

~Gran River

RIVER

~

5110004

5110004

5110008

MUHLENBERG

b -NS

3

~2-FS

3 353

3411H98B

WAH, fC, PCR, SCR

C

Cn~k3.8M7.8

_ _~____ _

_ C,,~M Ri

ver

RIVER

Grs~n Riy~r -j --- RryER

5110003

51700W

MUHLENBERG

OHIO

5~N8

~32-FS

~32-F$

2-FS

3 3 -

- ~

IH%1998

-- --- 3

/1/2003 -- -

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

C

CnNt 6.

71013.1

---

--

~ 3 5-PS

2-FS

3

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

C

Fork 0.0 b 8.7

- Gnan River

_ GnenRiwr__ ~~_r

RR/ER

RESERVpIR

~ RIVER

5110002

..5170004-

-BARREN ~ ~

-ORAYSON

~ CASEY

CASEY

35-PS

_11/3012007 ---- WAH FC PCR SCR

-~-

T-~--

C

IIIeCi R~arvok -.-- --..~.- _---_ .

C

Cn~k 3.d

l0 4

.75

1HH992

WAH FC PCR SCR

GrNn Rfv~r

5110007

5110007

~3 3

10!30!2007 -1/22/2008

10131!2007

WAH FC, PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Cnelt 19.4 t0 21.7

Groan Rivx

~RIVER

Casa

Croak 8.0.5 t

o 72

.25

Grs~n R{vx

RIVER

5110001

CASEY

2 -FS

33

33

10/3

1f20

07WAH FC PCR SCR

Cuh Crssk 0.0 to

S.B

Gn~n Rfwr

RIVER

5110005

HENDERSON

5-P3

33

33

311/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

CI

idc Cnslc

~.1 to 5.3

Green Rlvsr

RIVER

5710001

METCALFE

SPS

33

33

12f3

/200

2WAH FC PCR 3CR

CIS idc Croak 2.4 to

3.4

Green Ri

ver

RNER

5710001

WARREN

5-PS

SN3

33

33Hf2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cl~r Fork Cn~k 0.0

l0 6.

0Gn~n Riv

erRIVER

5110002

WARREN

2 -FS

33

33

1N7/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

CI'

Cn~lc 0.0 M 13.4

Grssn Ri

ver

RIVER

5170003

TODD

2-FS

33

33

71H22002

WAH FC PCR SCR

CI

CnNc 7.310 22.

2C3

rs~n

Rlv

~rRIVER

5110004

GRAYSON

2-FS

33

33

71122002

WAH FC PCR SCR

CoX~ Run 0.0 to 3.4

Gn~n Rlv

srRIVER

51100D1

HARDIN

5-PS

33

33

3/1f2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cnborch~M Creek 0.0

to 3.4

Green

Rive

►R

IVER

_51

1000

8HO

PKIN

S5 -

NS

33

33

12N

7I20

02W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRCn

ba

chxd

CnN

c 3.~

b 7.

3 _

Gre

en R

ivar

RIV

ER51

1000

8HO

PKIN

S4A

-NS

4A-N

S4A

-NS

33

2/29

1200

eW

AH F

C P

CR S

CRCr

ookW

Cro

ak 0

.0 to

3 0

Gn~

n R

iver

_R

IVER

5110

005

DAVI

ESS

35-

NS

33

33H

/200

3W

AFT

FC P

CR S

CRC

s C

reek

0.0

to B

.0

_Ci

resn

Rlv

x__

_ R

IVER

5110

006

McL

EAN

2-FS

5 -NS

5-N

S3

31H

0@OO

BW

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRC

Cns

k23.

1toZ

8.5

Grs

enR

iwr

RIV

ER51

1000

8M

UHLE

NBER

G5 -

PS5 -

PSS

PS

33

M1N

99B

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

C C

n~k

28.5

to 3

3.3

Gre

en R

iwr

RN

ER

5110

008

MUH

LENB

ERG

5 -PS

5-PS

SP

S3

33H

f200

3W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRD r

AaU

Crw

k O.

O l0

5.T

GrN

n R

iver

RIV

ER51

7000

4BR

ECKI

NRID

OE

5 -PS

33

33

3NI2

003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Dix C

n~k

0.0

to 8

.4G

twn

Riv

xR

NE

R51

100p

5W

EBST

ERS

NS

2 -FS

2-F8

33

119x

2008

WAH

fC

PCR

SCR

Dix C

n~k

8.41

0 77

.7G

rs~n

Riv

erR

IVER

5110

005

WEB

STER

2B 5

33

33

11/5

/200

7W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRD~

Nrt~

r Cre

ek 0

.0 to

3.1

Gre

en R

iver

RIV

ER51

1000

5DA

VIES

SS

PS

5 -NS

33

33/

1200

3W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRDi

xnal

Cre

ak 0

.0 to

3.2

Gre

en R

ivx

RIV

ER51

1000

1ED

MO

NSO

N2-

FS3

33

311

/512

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Run

2.1

to 3

.9G

rs~n

Rlv

erR

IVER

5110

001

HAR

DIN

5 -N

S3

33

33l

1f20

03W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRDn

ks~

Cro

ak 0

.0 to

23.

EG

ran

Riv

erR

IVER

6110

002

WAR

REN

2 -FS

2-F8

2-FS

5 -PS

31H

BI20

08W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRDn

k~~

Cro

ak 0

.0 to

9.0

Gre

en R

fvar

RIV

ER51

1000

8HO

PKIN

S4A

-NS

4A-N

S4A

-NS

33

2H4f

2008

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

D C

reek

0.0

to 3

.7G

roan

Rfv

xR

IVER

5110

001

CASE

Y5 -

PS3

33

33!

1200

3W

AH F

C P

CR S

CREa

st B

ench

0.0

to 1

.3G

rasn

Riv

erR

IVER

5110

006

CHRI

STUW

5 -PS

2 -FS

33

33/

1/20

03W

AH F

C

CR S

CRE~

~t F

otk M

Bar

ton

Rfve

r ~.

2 to

8.8

Gro

an R

fwr

RIV

ER51

1000

2M

ONR

OE

2 -FS

33

33

3H/2

003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Eut F

ork d

Dye

r Cra

nk 0

.0 to

6.8

Org

an R

ives

RIV

ER51

1000

5W

EBST

ER5 -

NS

33

33

311f

2003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

E~~t

For

k of L

ItNe B

arto

n R

iver

0.0

to 1

5.9

Gn~

n R

iver

~ R

IVER

5110

001

MET

CALF

E2 -

FS5-

P35 -

PS3

32/

2EI2

003

-11/

d0/2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

E at

For

k M Li

ttle

Ba

nn

Riv

er 1

6.9

to 2

0.7

GrN

n R

lwr

RIV

ER51

1000

1M

ETCA

LFE

2 -FS

2 -FS

2-FS

33

1 W1/

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Eut F

ork

W L

ittle

Bar

ran

Rlv

sr20

.710

30.0

Gn~

n R

iver

RIV

ER51

1000

1M

ETCA

LFE

SP

S5 -

PS2 -

FS3

311

/30@

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

E~~t

Pr

of In

dian

C

CrN

k 0.

0108

.3G

reen

Riv

erR

IVER

5110

003

BUTL

ER2 -

FS3

33

33H

/200

3W

AN F

C P

CR S

CRE

ton

Brr

xh 0

.0 M

1.9

Gre

en R

IvK

RN

ER

5170

002

BARR

EN5-

PS3

33

312

/3/2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Elfla

For

k of D

rrro

n C

n~k

0.0

to 3

.2G

n~n

RW

xR

IVER

5110

001

RUSS

ELL

2-FS

33

33

1 W1/

2004

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Elk

Crs

~k O

A to

5A

Gn~

n R

iver

RIV

ER51

100D

8HO

PKIN

S5 -

NS

33

33

3/12

0D2

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

REN

c Cn~

k 7.

8 ro

10.

8G

roan

Rlv

srR

IVER

5110

008

HOPK

INS

3S

NS

33

37J

18/2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

EHc L

ids C

reek

3.8

to 1

1.8

Gra

n R

iver

RIV

ER51

7000

3LO

GAN

2•FS

33

33

11M

2200

ZW

AH F

C P

CR S

CREl

k Po

nd C

reek

0.0

M ~.

5G

rwn

Riv

erR

IVER

5110

008

MUH

LENB

ERG

5-NS

5-N

33

33

3/7/

2003

~

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

F~II

71m

b~r C

n~k

0.0

to 8

.9f3

n~n

Riv

xR

IVER

5110

002

BARR

EN2-

FS3

32-

FS3

2/28

2003

-111

5120

07W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRF~

II Tl

mbe

r Cn~

lc 1

0.8

to 1

5.2

firw

n R

iver

RIV

ER51

1000

2M

ETCA

LFE

2-FS

2 -FS

2 -FS

33

123@

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Fidd

lers

Cta

sk 0

.0 W

5.9

Gte

sn R

iver

RIV

ERRI

VER

5110

004

5110

008

BREC

KINR

IDG

E2~

FS3

33

311

/12/

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Flit C

n~k

0.0

to 1

0.9

Gn~

n R

iver

HOPK

INS

SN

S5 -

NS

51

83

312

/77f

2002

-111

6/20

07W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CRFo

rWs

Cn~

k O.

O to

7.7

5l3

n~n

Riv

x~

RIV

ER51

1000

8CH

RIST

IAN

2-F$

33

__

__

3 _

312

/312

007

WAH

FC

PCR

, SCR

_ _

Ford

Dkc

h 0.

0 to

3.3

C3n~

n Riv

x_

___

RIVE

R51

1000

5DA

VIES

S_.

SPS

_3' 3

~._

33

3N/2

003

WAH

FC

PCR

, SCR

Frs~

n Ir

ksG

rNn

Riv

erRE

SERV

OIR

_._51

1000

7H

ARDI

N2-

FS3

2-F8

__3

37/

2820

08W

AH F

C P

CR S

CR_

_RN

er 1

~.8

to 1

7.2

Gra

n R

iver

_RI

VER

5110

002

LO(~

AN2-

F$3

3_.

.3

33!

1/20

03W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRRi

ver

7.75

!014

.8G

reen

Riv

erR

NE

R51

1000

2W

ARRE

N2-

FS2-

FS3

33

317/

2003

- 7/1

CROO

BW

AH F

C P

CR S

CRRi

ver 1

7,21

035.

6l~

Nn

Riv

erR

NE

R51

1000

2LO

C~~A

N2 -

FS3

33

371

/8@

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Gi11

N DN

eh 0

.0 to

S.I

Gre

en R

{vx

RN

ER

5110

005

DAV

IE53

5-N

S3

33

33/

7200

3W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRGN

ns F

ork

OA

l0 7

.1G

in R

ivar

RIV

ER51

1000

1AD

AIR

5 -PS

5-N

S5-

NS

33

3H/2

003

-111

8/20

07W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRG

oodm

an g

gp

00-0

230

Car

on R

iver

SPRI

NG51

7000

1H

ARD

IN2-

FS5-

NS3

33

1/25

1200

8W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRGo

ow C

reek

0.0

to 8

.5G

reen

Riv

erRI

VER

5110

001

CASE

Y2-

FS3

33

311

N2l

2o01

WAH

FC

PC

R S

CR D

WS

Goa

n M

III S

90

D40

793

Grs

~n R

iver

SPRI

NG51

7000

1H

ART

5-PS

5 -NS

33

31/

25/2

008

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

RCi~

~ham

S

9000

0051

Grs

sn R

ivar

SPRI

Nf3

5110

002

WAR

REN

5 -PS

5-PS

33

31/

25/2

008

WAW

FC

PCR

SCR

305(b) M

ant Rasulte, 2008

a

-

---

@itin

W~t~r Bodv Two

~ ~~

C 3r~st Creek

2.1 to 4.4

~ __

Gfle(1 Rfvsf 109.510151.2

GrNn Riva 151.2 W 170.E

Grssn Rivet 210.5 to

250.3

Grs~nRiwr 250.3 to

254.3

Gr~sn Wwr 251.E l0 270.0

iCxs~n Rhrer 270.O10 278.2

QroM RNsr 283.3 to

308.0

Green River

Green River

C xMn River

Grwn River

Gn~n River

Grs~nWv~r

(3nen River

Green RWer

Gn~n Rives

RESERVOIR

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

5170006

5110004

5110003

5110001

5110001

5110001

5110001

5170001

5110001

HOPKINS

OHIO

BUTLER

WARREN

HART

HART

C iREEN

GREEN

TAYLOR

2-FS

5 -N5

32 -

FS2 -

FS2 -FS

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

3 3 32-FS

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

5 -NS

2-FS 3 3

2-FS

2 -FS 3

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

3 32-FS 3

5-PS 3 3 3

2-FS

3 32-

FS 32-FS 3 3 3

2-FS

11114/2008

3H/2003

3H/2003 -1/9f200B

1/8!2008

3 11!2003 -11E2008

1 ~0J2003

1/8/2008

1/8/1008

119@008

WAH FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH PC PCR SCR

WAH, FC PCR 3CR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Grs~n River 328.5 to

344.95

_+

Gn~n Wwr 359.8 to

388.6

Groen Rivx

Grs~n River

RIVER

_RIVER

5170001

5170001

ADAtR

CASEY

2-fS

2 -FS

2 -FS 3

2-FS 3

3 33 3

7/92008

11H2/2002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Cxssn River 374.8 to 383.9

Green Rives

RNER

5110001

LIN LN

2 -FS

33

32-

FS1/9/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cxa~n Rives A6.3 M 55.2

Grsxi Rivar

RIVER

RNER

5110D05

McLEAN

2 -FS

33

32-

FS1/N200E

WAH, FC, PCR~ SCR, DW3

OrNn Rhrer 63.E to 77.9

Green Rives

5110005

McLEAN

33

33

2 -FS

1!&2009

WAH FC PCR SCR

Grwn River 0.2 to

28.2

Green River

RIVER

5110005

HENDERSON

2-FS

33

33 3

1!/!2009

1/82008

WAH FC PCR SCR

CAH FC PCR SCR

Oran RivK 278.2 t

o 283.2

Orson River

RIVER

_5110001

GREEN

32 -

FS2 -

FS~

2-FS

GrNn River 77.9 to 94.4

Grs~n Rfvar

RIVER

5110003

MUHLENBERG

2-FS

5-PS

2-FS

2 -FS

2-FS

1/8!2008

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

G►

s~n R

ivx

R~w

rvdr

Grw

n Ri

ver

RESE

RVO

IR51

1000

1TA

YLO

R2-

FS3

2-FS

5-PS

2-FS

1023

/200

6W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RGr

owiC

neltO

.O 1

06.4

Gro

anR

lvx

RIVE

R51

1000

5W

EBST

ERS

NS

33

33

3/11

2003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

HNb

Croa

k 8.

8 to

9.8

GfM

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

1000

OHI

O5 -

PS3

33

312

8200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RFiw

~rn

Cne

lc 0

.0 to

1.9

CirN

n Rh

rer

RIVE

R51

1000

5W

EBST

ER5-

PS3

33

331

1I1W

3W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RHe

ad d

R

Rive

r 3

154.

85 to

155

.8l3

rs~n

Rive

rSP

RING

5110

004

HARD

INS -

PS5 -

NS3

33

7/25

8008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Hidc

m~n

Cns

k 0.

810

3.2

Grw

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

1000

1CA

SEY

33

33

2-FS

11/8

/200

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RIrM

i~n C

Cr

s~k

0.1

to 3

.1G

rNn

Riv

xRI

VER

5110

003

BUTL

ER58

-PS

2-FS

33

33/

1!20

03 -1

1!61

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Indi

an

Cn~

k 3.

1 to

10.E

Gns

n R

lvx

RIVE

R51

1000

3BU

TLER

SPS

33

33

11/8

1200

7W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

RIn

dira

Crs

Nc 0

.0 to

7.5

Grs

sn R

iver

RN

ER51

1000

3W

ARRE

N2 -

FS3

33

33H

1t00

3W

AH C

AH F

G PC

R SC

RIn

dian

Cns

k O.

B l0

5.3

Grs

~n R

iver

RIVE

R51

1000

2M

ONR

OE

2 -FS

33

33

3/1/

2003

WAW

FC

PCFi

SCR

Iwa

a C

rank

0.0

to 7

.3G

rs~n

Riv

erRI

VER

_51

1000

8M

UHLE

NBER

G5 -

NS5 -

NSfl-

NS3

33H

f200

3W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

RJv

nls

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

1.B

Cxs~

n Rive

rRI

VER

5110

008

MUH

LENB

ERG

5 -NS

6-N8

3__

__

_3 3

33/

1/20

03W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRJr

nt F

ork

O.O !

01.1

Grs

~n R

iver

RI

VE

R51

100D

4G

RAYS

ON

5-NS

'5 -

NS~

33

33N

1200

3W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRH

ollo

w B

nrx~

0.0

to 2

.4G

rssn

Rfv

sry

RIVE

R _

5110

004

OHI

O~

33

__

3

_3

3 33/

1120

03W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR, D

WS

___

Jw~

Bran

ch O

.O to

~.4

Grs

~n R

lwr

RN

ERR N

ER51

7000

5DA

VIES

S5 -

PS3

312

/172

002

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

, OW

SJa

s R

un 0

.0 to

~.8

Gin

Rive

r51

1000

5DA

VIE5

36 -

PS3

33

372

H72

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Knob

lidc C

n~k

OA l0

2.1

GrN

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

1000

5DA

VIES

S3

5 -NS

33

33/

1120

03W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RKr

ablid

c CnN

t 0.0

to 9

.1G

t~en

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

005

WEB

STER

5 -NS

33

33

3N/2

003

WAH

PC

PCR

SCR

Lake

Luz

~ms

(3rN

n Rf

v~r

RESE

RVO

IR51

1000

3M

UHLE

NBER

G2-

FS3

33

5-PS

1HI1

9D2

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Wu

►~A

dpw

Gro

in R

iver

RESE

RVO

IR51

1000

3LO

GAN

2 -FS

32-

FS5-

PS2-

FS11

17,/2

008

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

Lake

Wa~

hbun

Grs

~n R

iver

RESE

RVO

IR51

700W

OHI

O2-

FS3

2-FS

33

11/7

4!20

08W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRL~

unl C

roak

W M

ud R

iver 2

.1 to

8.8

G►Mn

Rive

rR

NER

5110

003

IOG

AN2 -

FS3

33

311

/8@

007

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

Lwvi

i Cra

ck 0

.0 to

11.8

Gin

Rive

rRI

VER

6110

003

OHI

O5 -

PS2-

F$3

33

3H2O

o1W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CRLe

wi

Lake

GrN

n R

iver

RESE

RVO

IR51

1000

3LO

GAN

33

33

3W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRW

csC

,nen

Rfw

rRE

SERV

OM

t61

1000

1CA

SEY

2-FS

32-

F83

311

H~2

0oe

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lldc C

nelc

0.0

w 10

.2G

roan

RIv

KR

NER

5110

002

SIM

PSO

N2-

FS3

33

311

112/

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lkk

Cree

k 0.

0 to

3.7

GrN

n R

iver

~ RI

VER

5110

005

HEND

ERSO

NS

NS

33

3~_

__3 3

3H2O

012/

1120

06W

AM, F

C, P

CR, S

CRW

AH F

C PC

R SC

RU

dc C

n~k

6.0

W 1

3.8

Gn~

n R

lwri

RIVE

R _

,b1

10D0

5HE

NDER

SON

5 -NS

33

___

3Lk

W~r

sCn~

k O

.Ol0

7.9

GrM

nRiv

erRI

VER

5110

004

HARD

IN2-

F83

3'

33

1W1l

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Crw

k 0.

0 to

0.9

Gn~

n Ri

ver

_RI

VER

~51

1000

1HA

RTS~

PS3

33

33H

/200

3W

AH f

C P

CR S

CRLk

is C

n~k

0.0

to 7

.2G

reen

Rhn

rRI

VER

5110

002

MO

NRO

E2 -

FS3

33

33H

@00

3W

AH F

C PC

SC

RLk

d~ B

ran

Rive

r 0.

0 to

9.8

(~~e

n R

ivw

RN

ER51

1000

1G

REEN

2-FS

~

2 5

2-F3

33

18/1

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lfltl~

Bra

n R

iver

9.B

!015

.7G

rNn

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

001

GRE

EN3

5 -NS

S~NB

33

1/2/

2008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lkgs

Bw

wrd

~m C

raNc

0.0

to 11

.4G

roan

Riv

erRI

VER

5110

001

WAR

REN

5 -PS

33

33

11HM

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LltW

&ug

h C

ask

3.2

W 1

3.2

Gre

en R

lwr

RIVE

R51

1000

1G

REf

N2-

FS5-

NS2-

FS3

31N

1/20

07 -1

111

1200

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RLk

tN C

w

Cas

k O.

O !0

10.1

Grs

~n R

hnr

RIVE

R51

1000

8M

UHLE

NBER

G5 -

PS3

33

314

/7/2

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LitW

Cr

s~k

8.8

to 7

2.9

C,~N

n Rive

rRI

VER

511t

l002

BUTL

ER5 -

PS3

33

33M

/200

1W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RLk

W

Cn~

k 5.

2 to

8.8

Gns

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

1000

2BU

TLER

5 -NS

33

33

3H/1

003

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

LittN

Pifm

~n C

n~k

70.1

to 1

1.2

Gn~

n Ri

ver

RN

ER51

1000

1TA

YLO

R2-

FS5-

NS2-

FS3

3x/

5/20

07W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RLi

ttle

Pftrm

n Cr

eek O

.O to

10.1

Grs

~n R

fwr

RN

ER51

1000

1TA

YLO

R2-

FSS -

N8

5 -PS

3 _

314

7/20

07 -1

1Nl2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LHtN

Rw

~NI C

rs~k

0.0

to 5.

7G

rs~n

Rive

rRI

VER

5170

001

GRE

EN2

f8S

PS

2 -FS

3 __ _

3 ~_

312

/812

007

_W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CR

_LA

IN S

hort

Cns

ic 0

.0 to

3.1

Gts

~n R

lwr

RN

ER-

--

RIVE

R --

---

- 51

1000

4G

RAYS

ON

2~8

2-F8

33

7 W~r

zoo7

_ W

N1, F

C, P

CR, S

CRLN

U~ T

nmm

~I C

nNc

OA

to 2

.4 --

--- --

- --- --

GtN

n R

lwr -

5110

002

ALLE

NM

UHLE

NDER

O2 -

FSS

P3 ~ 3

3. --

3- .-

- 3

_

--3

~3

3H12

003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lag

O

.Oto

3.3

Gn~

nRiv

er61

1000

83

10N

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

305(b) Aeusament Rewk~, 2008

a T

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH C PCR SCR

L Falb Creek 0.0 to 7.8

L Falb Creek 7.6 to 11

.8Grwn River

C~~en Rivx

RIVER

RNER

5110005

5110005

McLEAN

McLEAN

5-PS

5-PS

5-NS

5-NS

3SNS

3 33 3

1?J77/2002

3/ 12003

L

Fork 0.5 to 1.7

C3rsen River

RNER

5110002

MONROE

2-FS

33

33

3N/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

L

Lids Cnelc ~.B l0 7.2

Grs~n River

RNER

5110004

BRECKINRIOGE

5-NS

33

33

3Nf2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Loa RW~r RIN 90000054

Grwn River

SPRING

5110002

WARREN

2-FS

SNS

33

31I24200e

WAH FC PCR SCR OWS

L

C

Creek

O.O to B.3

Green River

RIVER

5110001

HART

2-FS

5-NS

6-NS

33

12!6/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

M~tNrin

90000202

Gts~n River

SPRING

5110004

GRAYSON ~

2 -FS

5-N3

33

312If200E

WAH FC PCR, SCR

McClure Fork d Bear Cn~k 3.1 to 4.1

GrNn RFv~r

RIVER

5110001

GRAYSON

SB-NS

33

33

72/8/2007

WAH CAH FC PCR SCR DWS

N kC

Blurhol~ S

9000.0792 ___

___

Gran Rlwr

SPRING

5110001

HART

2-F3

SNS

33

31/25/200E

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

McFuland Cn~k 1.5

to S.0

__OrNn River

_ RIVER

5110008

CHRISTIAN

2-FS

33

3 v

~3

11/122002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

CnNc 0.0 M 1.9

_ _ _

Gram Rivx

_ _ RNER

_RIVER

511000

OHIO

5-PS

2-FS

33 ~

33H/2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

MN~dow Creek 0.0 to 0.8 _i_____

Gn~n River

5110007

CiREEN

2-FS

33

33

3H@003

WAH FC, PCR SCR DWS

hN~dow Creek O.B l0 7.

4 ___

_Grs~n River

RIVER

5110001

GREEN

2-FS

33

33

3M12003

WAH FC PCR SCR

MNt

Cn~k 5.2 W 1I.0

_C3rs~n River

RIVER

51100W

HARDIN

5-PS

33

33

12/812007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

MMcaM~

l.~k~

Gnan River

RESERVOIR

5110001

METCALFE

2-FS

32-FS

33

1111 /2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Middy Fork d Onk~a Creek 0.0 to 7,8

Green Rfver

RIVER

5110002

WARREN

5-PS

33

33

12812007

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

Mid

dle Fork d Dralcs~ Croak 12.0 to 18.3

Grs~n R'rvsr

RNER

5110002

ALLEN

2-FS

33

33

126@007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mid

dle Pitmen Cnrk 0.0 to 7.7

Groan River

RIVER

5110001

GREEN

2-FS

SNS

5-NS

33

12/BR007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Middle Pitmen Cn~k B

.2 to 10.1

__

Green River

RIVER

5110001

TAYLOR

2 -FS

5-NS

2-FS

33

72/8/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mill

CroNc O.O l0 2.

8 ____ _

_.___

Gn~n River

RIVER

5110001

TAYLOR

2-FS

33

33

3/1/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mill

CrNk 0.0 to 4.2

___.

Gnan RivK

RIVER

5710004

OHIO

_3

5-NS

33

33/1/'2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mill

Croak 8.0 W 7.0

___

_Grasn RNx

RNER

5110002

MONROE

33

33

2~F3

7218@007

WAH FC PC SCR

Mill

CreNt Lalu Maros C

___

Grs~n River

_RESERVOIR _

SPRING

5110002

MONROE

2-FS

32 -FS

32-F8

11HM2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mill

9000-7793

Gn~n River

5110001

~GRAYSON

2-FS

SNS

33

31/252000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Moth Lkk CrsNc O.O l0 3.3

Green River

RNER

~ RNER

5110003

L0f3AN

2-FS

33

33

3/712003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mud River 30.9 to 52.2

Grs~n River

~~ 5110003

LOGAN

32-FS

35

3~

1/2/'1008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mud River 52.2 to 64.0 _ _____ ___

Green River

__ RIVER

_5170003

LOGAN

33

328(b)

._3

3/12003

WAH FC PCR, SCR


Grs~n River

RNER

5110003

MUHLENBERG

5-NS

2-FS

2-FS

5-NS

31/2/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR


GrNn Rfwr

RNER

5110003

MUHLENBERG

33

35

312B/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k 0.0 to 5.9

Gn~n River

RIVER

5170003

BUTLER

2 -FS

S~PS

33

31N812008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cult 7.910 4A

GrMn RNnr

RNER

5110004

OHIO

5-NS

2-FS

33

32/28/2003

WAH FC PCR. SCR

Cn~k 5.8 to 9.1

Green River

RIVER

5110004

OHIO

5-PS

33

33

~l191200E

WAH FC PCR SCR

CnNt 8.81015.2

Gn~n Rivx

RNER

51100p3

BUTLER

5-PS

33

33

12/62007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Crak 8.1 to 15.5

GrNn River

RIVER

5110004

OHIO

2 -FS

33

33

_11H?/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

_Cn~k 0.0 to 5.0

Gr~~n RivK

_RNER

5710004

OHIO

5-PS

33

33

8/t/

2003

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Fork

O.O to ~.6

Grs~n River

RNER

5110008

MUHLENBERf3

2-FS

33

33

12H7f2002

WAH, FC PCR SCR

N

Crs~k 2.8 to 4.1

Grs~n River

RIVER

5110008

HOPKINS

5-NS

33

33

3HR003

WAH FC PCR SCR

No Cn~k 0.5 to 9.2

GrsM River

RNER

5110004

OHIO

2-FS

33

3• 3

3H2O03

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Ndin River 88.2 to 98.5

Grwn Rfwr

RNER

5110001

HARDIN

2 -FS

33

33

3/112003

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Nolan Rlvsr 0.0 to 7.7

Green River

RNER

5110001

EDMONSON

2-FS

33

33

10@5!2007

WAH FC PC SCR

NoIM RivK 37.8!0 88.2

Cxe~n River

RIVER

5110001

HMDIN

2-FS

5~PS

32-FS

2-FS

3H@003 - 7 0125/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Nolan RfvK R~Nrvok

Cxs~n River

RESERVOIR

5710001

GRAYSON

1 -FS

1-FS

1-FS

1-F8

7-FS

1012U2007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Nol

S

90002673

Gn~n Rivx

SPRING

5110001

LARUE

SPS

S~N8

33

3125/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

NorM &ands of Souh Fork M PeMhx Creek 0.0 to 4.2

Grwn River

RIVER

5110D05

HAN CK

5 -NS

33

33

3HI2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

NoAh Fork of B~m~tt Creek 0.0 to 2.3

Grs~n Rivx

RNER

5110004

OHIO

5-PS•

33

33

3H/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

North Fork of Nolan RivK 3.0 to 7.0

Cxsen River

i RIVER

5110007

LARUE

5-NS

33

32-FS

12!lrt007

WAH FC PCR, SCR

North FoAt of PrMhx Cn~lc 4.2 to 9.1

Grs~n Rfver

RIVER

5110D05

DAVIESS

S -PS

SNS

33

33Hl2003 -1211/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

North Fork of Prdh~r CnNc OA to 1.2

Grs~n River

RNER

511000.5

DAVIESS

28 6

33

33

1 W7@007

WAH FC PCR SCR

North Fork d R

Wv~r 11.5 to 74.1

Grwn River

RNER

5110004

BRECKINRIDGE

2-FS

33

33

12/1/2007

WAN FC PCR SCR

NoM Fork of R

River 14.1 l0 21.5

~n~n River

RIVER

5110004

BRECKINRIDGE

2 -FS

33

33

10/7/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

NoAh Fork P~ntlwr Creek 9.7 to 12.7

GrNn River

RIVER

5110005

DAVIESS

_5-PS

33

33

12/17/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

~~rpN ~

Grwn River

RESERVOIR

5110008

MOPKINS

33

32-FS

31@812008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Old Pr1Mr Croak 0.410 5.7

GrNn River

_~

RIVER

5110005

DAVIESS

5-NS

33

33

3HI2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Old Panther Cask 5.7 l0 8.8

Gn~n River

RNER

5110005

DAVIESS.

5-NS

33

3~

~~

3_....----3

-_ .w_

. _

.__..._..

3~

3

33H2O03

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

OnK Cr..k o.o a a.3

PaMMrCn~k 0.1103.0

_".-

_. _.._.--~_--

Cr~.n River

RNER

_ RNER

_.~.

5110005

RNER

RNER

5110008

HOPItlNH

5-N8

_y

S.Ng-!

_SNS

_5-NS

~ SPS

3

.3 3

3..5~3 3

3_ 3

--

~ _3f4t2003

__ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

_ _- GrwnRiwr

DAVIE33

--_.-1fY21200E

--

- WAH FC,PCR,9CR

Panther CrNk 17.9 W 20.4

__..

Grs~n Rives

5110005

_DAVIESS

312H7/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

u

--.-.

P~rMhK Cmk O.O l0 3.8

__Groin RN~r

5110003

BllTI.ER

311/1C200B

CAH FC PCR SCR

paMhsr Croak 3.0 to 5.9

~ ~

Gn~n Rhrw

R11[ER

5110005

DAVIESS

35-N8

33

33N@003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pita Creak 1I.2 to 21.0

GrNn River

RIVER

5110002

BARREN

2-FS

33

33

11H?/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

P

t Fak 0.0 to 8.1

Cxs~n Rivet

RIVER

6110001

ADAIR

5-PS

SPS

SPS

33

3/12003 -1Q~302007

WAH fC PCR SCR

305(b) As

a it

RewHa, 20

08

WAH FC, PCR SCR

WAH fC PCR SCR

-- WAH FC PCR SCR

P

CrNk O

.O to

3.4

__ _

P lws~ntRun O.Ofo2.0

____

Plww~t Run 2.O W 7.8

__

__

Green River

4nenRiwr

Grwn River -

RIVER

RIVER

- --- RNER

T~-

._.

5110004

5 110008

.5110006

OHIO

H PKINS

HOPKINS

5 -PS

5 -NS

4A-NS

34A-NS

4MN3

3M

► -NS

4A-N

S

3 3~-- -

3 ---

~ 3

3 3 3 3

3H2O

03

--- ~H

/199

8 --

-Pl

um C

rs~k

0.0

to 1.

7G

nan

Riv

er_

RNER

__

5110

0D3

MUH

LENB

ERG

5 -NS

33

_Pl

um C

n~k

1.7

W 3.

9Gr

een R

iver

__

RNER

3H/1

003

WAH

FC

PCR,

SCR

5 170

008

MUH

LENB

ERG

5 -NS

5 -NS

33 3 3

33H

R003

WAH

FC,

PCR

SCR

Pail C

reek

0.0

b ~.

8 _

.P o

nd C

n~k

7~.1

to 18

,1G

rNn

Rive

rG r

een R

lvx

RNER

R IVE

R51

1000

35 1

1000

3M

UHLE

NBER

GM

UHIE

NBER

G2 -

FS5 -

P32-

FS4A

-NS

2-FS

4A-N

S3 3

1HBf

2008

14/3

1200

7W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

RW

qH F

C PC

R SC

RPo

nd C

r~Nt

18.

1 to 2

21G

rMn R

fwr

RNER

5110

003

MUH

LENB

ERG

5-PS

4A-N

S4A

-NS

33

1Y/3

1R00

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RPo

nd C

rNk

4.B

to T.

8G

rMn

RNro

rRN

ER51

1000

3M

UHLE

NBER

G5 -

NS2 -

FS3

33

72/1

7200

2W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RPo

nd C

n~lc

7.d t

o 11.

7G

roin

Rhia

rRN

ER51

1000

3M

UHLE

NBER

G5-

NS4A

-NS

4A-N

S3

312

!3112

007

WAH

FC,

PCR

SCR

Pond

Cr~

elt 7

1.7 t

o 14.

4G

rwn

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

0D3

MUH

LENB

ERG

SNS

4A-N

S4A

-NS

33

12I3

7R00

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RPo

nd D

rain

0.0

10 2.

3 _

CxN

n Rive

rRN

ER51

1000

8M

cLEA

N5 -

PS3

33

33H

2OD3

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Pond

Riw

r 1.O

to 20

.6

__

_C~

rs~n

Riwr

RIVE

R57

7000

8HO

PKIN

S5 -

PS2-

FS2 -

FS3

31H

8720

D8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RPo

nd R

fvv O

.O l0

7.0

Gre

en R

iver

RIVE

R51

1000

8HO

PKIN

33

2-FS

33

33/

1/20

03W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RP o

nd R

ivsr2

0.8 b

31.7

__,_

GrN

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

1000

8M

UHLE

NBER

O5-

PS3

33

34H

H998

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Pond

RN~

r 57.

710 8

1.2

Grs

~n R

iver

_.R I

VER

5110

008

CHRI

STIA

N2 -

FS2 -

FS2 -

FS3

31H

8f20

08W

AH F

C PC

R 3C

RPo

nd R

lwr G

1.2 to

77.4

Grs

~n R

iver

~_R I

VER

5110

006

MUH

LENB

ERO

5 -PS

2-FS

33

33/

2800

3W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CRP a

x! R

un 0

.0 to

8.8

Cirs

~n R

iver

RNER

5110

004

OHIO

2-FS

5 -PS

33

3ta~

noo~

- ~n3

rzooe

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

P G

rove

Brr

xh O

.O l0

3.4

Ca►s

M R

lwr

RNER

~

5110

001

TAYL

OR3

5-NS

3~~

3 ~

33N

2003

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

Pu~d

»on

CnNc

O.O

to ~

.3

_f3

rNn R

lvx

RIVE

R51

1D00

2AL

LEN

2 -FS

33

-'

33

3H2O

03W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RRe

nder

Cre

ak 0.

0 to 3

.8G

reen

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

003

OHIO

rrNS

4A-N

S4A

-NS

33

2H4@

006

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Rhod

e! C

rnk

0.0 t

o 1.9

Cry

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

005

DAVI

ESS

SPS

3~3

33

3!112

003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Rhod

es C

reek

0.0

to 2.

2G

n~n

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

0D5

DAVI

ESS

5 -NS

33

33

12H7

I200

2W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RRh

ode

CnN

t 2.

210 7

.5G

rit R

iver

RNER

5110

005

DAVI

ESS

5 -NS

33

33

12N7

r100

2W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CRRi

dd~n

d S

0.0 t

o 4.

9G

rNn

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

005

HEND

ERSO

N5 -

NS3

33

33H

@OO

;iW

AH, F

C PC

R, S

CRRa

binw

n Cn

Wt 1

3.5 W

18.1

GrN

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

1000

1TA

YLOR

2 -FS

33

33

1011

x200

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RRo

bfnw

n C

rwk

8.8

to 10

.8l3

rNn

Rive

rRN

ER51

7000

1TA

YLOR

5 -PS

33

33

12/13

1200

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RR

CtN

kI.B

l012

.2G

rs~n

Rive

rRI

4ER

5110

003

MUH

LENB

ERG

2-FS

33

33

7W1I

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

R Ri

ver

0.0

W 10

.EG

nMi R

iver

RIVE

R51

1000

4M

cLEA

N5 -

NS5-

NS5-

PS3

31/

4/20

07 -1

8200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RR

Rive

r Z7

.210

ZE.9

CxN

n Rive

rRN

ER51

1000

4OH

IO3

2-FS

33

33/

1200

3W

AH F

C PC

R S

R Ri

ver 7

25.2

to 7

49.E

CarN

n Rive

rRI

VER

5110

004

HARD

IN2-

FS5-

PS3

33

71H2

1200

2 -10

1250

1007

WAH

FC,

PCR

3R

Rive

r 29.

910 3

0.9

Gre

en R

ivN

RIVE

R51

1000

OHIO

33

33

2-FS

1@/2

000

WAM

FC

PCR

SR

Rive

r 55.

1 b 84

.3f3

nrn

Rfw

rRI

VER

5710

004

OHIO

5 -NS

5-NS

5 -NS

33

1/2/

2007

-1l?

I200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RRN

nr 87

.0 to

90.3

GrM

n Rive

rRI

VER

5110

D04

BREC

KINR

IDGE

2-F3

33

33

10I2

U200

7W

AH F

C, P

CR, S

CRR

Rive

r R~t

~rw

kG

rs~n

Rfw

rRE

SERV

OIR

5710

0WHA

RDIN

2 -FS

2-FS

2-FS

5-PS

2-FS

1083

/100

7W

AH, F

C PC

R, 3

CRRa

nd S

tony

Cns

k 0.

0 to 1

0.2

Ore

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R57

1000

7HA

RT2 -

FS3

33

33/

1/20

03W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RRw

aNl C

1s~k

0.0

to 7.

2G

rwn

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

001

Gf2E

EN2 -

FS2-

FS3

33

12/1

8/20

07W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RRu

usH

Cre

ek 1

2.8 W

21.

1G

rNn

Rhr~

rRI

VER

5110

001

GREE

N2-

FS3

33

33/ 1

!200

3W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RRw

s~ll C

nNt

23.8

M 40

.0G

rs~n

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

001

ADAI

R2 -

FS5-

NS5 -

PS3

317

118!2

007

W/W

FC

PCR

SCR

Rww

llCnM

t,0.0

l042

.2G

reen

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

001

ADAI

R2-

FS5 -

NS5-

NS3

33/

1/20

03-1

~H8f

2007

WAH

FC

PCR,

SCR

Ruu~

N C

rNk

42.2

10 80

.4G

reen

Rive

sRI

VER

5110

001

ADAI

R2-

FS3

33

2-FS

12HB

l2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

RwsM

l Cn~

k 80.

4 W 8

8.3

Grs

~n R

iver

RNER

5710

001

ADAI

R2-

FSSN

S5-

NS3

312

/18!

2007

WAH

, FC

PC

SCR

Rwa~

q C

nsk 7

.210

12.8

Grp

Riv

K_

_R I

VER

5710

001

_GR

EEN

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

__

__3

3_

12H8

12D0

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RSa

lim W

csG

rNn

Rive

rRE

SERV

OIR

5110

001

LARU

E2 -

FS3

2 5

33

11H4

1200

8W

AH F

C, P

CR, S

CRSa

lt Lkk

Cre

ek O

A to

1.4

Sall L

lck C

rwk

O.O l

0 3.

7 ~

Gn~

n Rfw

rRI

VER

5110

002

WAR

REN

5-NS

33

33

317/2

003

WAH

FC

PCR

3CR

(irN

n Ri

ver

RIVE

R ~

b110

0D3

MUH

LENB

ERG

2-FS

33

33

72H7

rz00

2W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CRSN

t Lick

Cre

ek 1

.B l0

4.8

Grs

~n R

iver

RI1f

~Rb1

1000

2M

ONRO

E2-

FS3

33

33H

1200

3W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CRSa

nd L

kk C

reek

O.O

to ~.

DG

rem

Rive

s_

_RI

VER

5110

003

MUH

LENB

ERG

5 -PS

33

_3

31Z

H7/2

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Hollo

w W

esO

men

Rive

rRE

SERV

OIR

5110

001

WAR

REN

2-F3

32-

F33

311

I1U2

006

WAH

FC

PCR

3CR

Sba~

Cn~

k 0.

0 to 7

.5C

xwn

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

003

OHIO

2-FS

~3

33

312

HBQ0

07W

AH F

C PC

R 3C

Rs C

n~k

5.51

0 23.

3O

rNn R

iver

_R

NER

5110

002

BARR

EN2 -

FS5~

N33

33

10lY

1/20

D7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RSk

~u

KWX1

900

0-13

98(3

rwn

RNra

5110

001

HARD

IN5 -

PS5~

NS3

33

1025

!2008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Smith

Cn~

k 0.

0 to 4

.4(ir

oM R

iver

RIVE

R51

1000

4OH

IO2 -

FS3

33

33/

1!20

03W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RSo

uth F

ork

0.0 t

o 2.2

CxN

n RN

r~r

RIVE

R57

1000

7CA

SEY

2-FS

33

33

3172

001

CAH

FC P

CR S

CRSa

Ah Fo

rk 2

.2 to

7.5

GrN

n Rh

rer

RIVE

R51

1000

1CA

SEY

2-FS

33

33

3!1!

2003

WAH

, FC

PC

SCR

SaR

h For

k NoN

n Rive

r 0.

0 to 8

.4(ir

esn

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

0D1

LARU

E2-

FS3

33

33H

/200

1W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RSo

W~ F

ork o

f Be~

wr C

tMk

0.0 t

o 3.2

Gro

in R

lvar

RIVE

R51

1000

2BA

RREN

S~PS

33

33

10/22

1200

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RSo

uth F

ork o

f Lkt

l~ B

arto

n Rfw

r OA

to 23

.1C~

rNn R

iver

RNER

5110

001

MET

CALF

E2-

FS5-

NSSN

S3

312

H Bl

1007

WAH

FC

PCR

8CR

Sout

h For

k d Lk

W B

~rnn

Rfv

a 23

.1 to

30.1

Gtw

n W

wr

RN

ER51

1000

7M

ETCA

LFE

5-PS

6 -PS

2-FS

33

1211

8/200

7W

AH, F

C, P

CR S

CRSo

uth F

ork d

PanlF

wr C

nNc

0.0 t

o 24

Gre

en W

wr

RIVE

R51

1000

5DA

VIES

S5-

P35 -

NS3

33

1122

/2008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Swth

Fw

k M P~

MM

r Cre

ek 1

IA ro

18.

3G

nsn

Rlv

xRI

VER

5110

005

DAVI

ESS

35-

NS3

33

3!1!

2003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

'~ V

305(b)Aa~saement Rasuke,2008

a OD

HSouth Fork M P~ntMr Cn~k 2.4 to 9.55

SaM Fork d PantMr Cn~k 9.55 to 14.0

Gn~n Rfwr

C xwn RivK

RIVER

RIVER

5110005

5110005

DAVIESS

DAVIESS

5 -NS

5 .P3

35 -NS

3 33 3

3 312/18001

12/17n0o2

WAH FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork d Ru...11 Cro.k 0.0 ro e.~

Cxeen Riwr

RIVER

5110001

GREEN

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

33

12H92002 -12H92007

WAH FC PCR SCR

L~k~

Gn~n Riwr

RESERVOIR

5110003

LOGAN

2-FS

35 -PS

33

11!142008

WAH FC PCR SCR

S

Lek

Carom RivK

RESERVOIR

5110001

TAYLOR

2-FS

33

33

11/14f2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

S

CrsNt 1.3W I.I

CirNn River

RIVER

5110005

HENDERSON

SP$

33

33

11/12/2002

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Sul

Brmd~ 0.0 to 3.0

CxNn River

RIVER

5110001

EDMON30N

2-FS

33

33

10112007

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Sul

Creek 0.0 W 10.7

Gn~n River

RIVER

Si10001

ADAIR

35 -PS

2-FS

33

12/19/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sul

Cn~k 10.71015.4

Grs~n River

RfVER

5110001

ADAIR

2 -FS

33

33

12H912007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Su

For1c Cn~k OA ro 5.3

GrNn Rlva

RIVER

5110002

ALLEN

2-FS

33

33

3!112003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork Crs~k 5.3 to 7.9

_Gn~n River

RIVER

5170002

ALLEN

2-FS

33

33

3/1f2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

SuMfah Crs~k

B.B !010.3

Gn~n River

RNER

51100D1

GRAYSON

5-PS

33

33

3H/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

p &aneh 1

.0 to 4.0

Gn~n River

RIVER

5110005

DAVIESS

5-PS

33

33

12/17!2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

S

CnNc 0.0 to

1.8

Green Rtv~r

RIVER

5710001

EDMONSON

5-NS

33

33

3N2W3

WAH FC PCR SCR

T

for Fork 0.0 to 4.0

_Cxs~n River

RNER

5110001

GRAYSON

SNS

33

33

3H/2003

WAH, FC PCR SCR

&~rx~h 0.0 b 1.5

Gn~n River

RNER

5170002

SIMPSON

2-FS

33

33

9!73@007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Thra~ Udc Fork

O.O l0 3.3

Green River

RNER

5110004

OHIO

5~N$

33

33

3N/2003

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Town Branch 0.0 to 8.2

Cxs~n River

RIVER

5110003

LOGAN

33

3SNS

312H9/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Tna Fork W Litlk Pitmen Creek 1.3 to 2,3

Gn~n River

RIVER

5110001

TAYLOR

33

33

2-FS

12N912007

WAH FC PCR SCR

TnmmN Creek of Dnlua Crs~k 0.0 to 2~.0

Grs~n River

RNER

5110002

WARREN

2-FS

2 -FS

33

31H82008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Tmm~N Creek W Drake Croak 24.0 to 30.8

Green Rhr~r

RNER

5110002

ALLEN

2-FS

33

33

11172/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

TuN~ Cask 5.2 to 73.5

Gn~n River

RNER

5110004

BRECKINRIDOE

2-FS

33

33

3/112003

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Two MII~ Cask O.O to 4.7

Green River

RIVER

511 005

DAVIESS

2-FS

33

33

12/172002

WAH FC PCR SCR

U

9rwh CnNc 0.0 tc 2.B

C3nin Rfv~r

RNER

5110001

TAYLOR

32-FS

33

33HI2003

WAH FC, PCR SCR

UT d Whit ONc Creak OA to 3.3

UT to B~w~rd~m CnNc 0.0 to

1.3

~ ~

Cif~sn River

RNER

~ ~

RIVER

5110001

ADAIR

2-F8

33

33

12/20/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

CxNn Rivx

5110001

EDMONSON

2-FS

33

33

7012912007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Bull Run CnNt 0.1 to 1.0

Cx~en River

RIVER

___

RIVER

_RNER

RIVER

5110001

CASEY

2-F$

33

33

3/1/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Butler Breech 0.0 b _17

_ _ _

Cirssn Rlvsr

~ 5110007

ADAIR

5-PS

3~ 3

_ _ 3

_3

33!112001

WAH, FC PCR SCR

_UT to Cool

CnNc 0.0 b 1.6

GrNn RWx

5110001

ADAIR

5-NS

S~PS

33

3_

3N2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT M C

Creek 0.0 to 1.4

Green Rivx~

5710008

MUHLENBERG

33

33

12N72002

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to C

Cn~k 0.0 to

~E.1

_ __

Carson Rhror

RNER

5170006

MUHLENBERG

5-P$

33

33

1 W312007

CAH FC, PCR, SCR

~ __

UT to Don

Run O.O !01.0

Gn~n RWx

__

RIVER

5110001

HARDIN

58 -NS ~

33

33

11/14/2007

CAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Dnk~~ Creek OA to 2.2

Green RWsr

RIVER

5110008

HOPKIN3

5-P8

33

33

11/5/ 2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to ENc Cn~k 0.0 to 1.0

Gran River

RNER

5710008

HOPKINS

35-NS

33

3x/1/1998

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to EIK Croslc 0.0 to

2.8

Grsan River

RNER

51100D8

HOPKINS

5-PS

33

33

11/52008

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Flit Cn~k D.0 to 3.1

Grwn River

RNER

5110008

HOPKINS

S~NS

33

33

3!1/2003

W/1H FC PCR, SCR

UT to Fist CrNk 3.1 to 4.7

Green Rfvx

RIVER

57 70008

HOPKINS

35-NS

33

3M1H998

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

UT to G

River 0

.0 to 3.1

Gn~n River

RNER

5110002

LOGAN

2-F$

33

33

11/812007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

UT to Grs~n River 0.010 0.9

Grssn River

RNER

51100A1

CASEY

68 -NS

33

33

7218/2007

WAH PC PCR SCR

UT to Gn~n River 0.0 to 3.2

GrNn Rivx

RNER

5110001

ADAIR

2-FS

33

33

111612007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to HNtK CnNc 1.2 to

1.8

Green River

RIVER

5110001

CASEY

2-FS

33

33

3!1/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT W JoH Bnneh 0.0 to

2.8

Gwen River

RNER

5110005

DAVIESS

SB-NS

33

33

11/8/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to M~

Run 0.0 to 0.4

___

GrNn River

RNER

5710004

HARDIN

2-FS

33

33

3!72003

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

UT la Mlddh Pitrnri Creek O.D to 0.8

Gran Rivx

RNER

5710001

TAYLOR

2-FS

33

33

3HI2003

WAH FC, PCR SCR

UT W Noun River O.O l0 0.~

Grssn River

RNER

5110007

EDMONSON

35B -N$5B-NS

33

1/4/2009

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Nolin River 0.15 to 0.9

Green River

RNER

5110001

HARDIN

58 -NS

33

33

12/7/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to North Fork d P~nth~r Crs~k 0.0 to 0.7

Grs~n River

RNfR

5110005

DAVIE3S

58-NS

33

33

12!7!2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Pond Cnsk 0.0 to

2.4

Green Rfvsr

RIVER

5110003

MUHLENBERG

5 -NS

33

33

3Nf2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Pond Run O

.O l0 0.8

Gn~n Rhr~r

RNER

51100D4

BRECKINRIDGE

2-FS

33

33

17H42002

WAFT FC PCR SCR

UT to Rkhl~nd Cnsk 0.0 to

1.7

Gn~n RWsr

RNER

5110002

BUTLER

5-N3

33

33

74/132007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to South Fork d Rwa~ll Crosfc O.O l0 0

.8Oro~n River

RIVER

5110001

GREEN

4A-NS

33

33

7!312002

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT W Tallow Cn~k 0.0 to 7.7

Green River

RNER

5110001

TAYLOR

2-FS

33

33

12/212007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to UT d R~

Fork 0.0 to 0.25

Green Rlvsr

RNER

5110002

WARREN

58-NS

SB-NS

33

312H3/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR ~WS

UT to W~kh Crs~k 0.0 to 0.9

f3r~en Rlwr

RIVER

5110003

BUTLER

SB-NS

5B-NS

33

31YH9f2007

CAH FC PC SCR DWS

UT to Ww1

Fork

Grs~n River

RIVER

5710002

ALLEN

5-PS

33

33

14/79!2007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

UT to West Fork M Lewis Cn~k 0.0

to 2.2

Groan River

RNER

5110003

OHIO

5-NS

33

33

3N/2003 _

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to W„t P

of kidian C

CreNc 0.0 b O.B

Grs~n Rlwr

_RIVER

- - -

RIVER

~5110003

5110002

5170001

b110o01

OHIO

33

_ _3

312/2Q2007

CAH FC PCR 6CR OWS

UT to

i Cn~k 0.9 to 1.9

----

- Grwn Rfvx '

~ LOGAN

_ SB-NS

.~ 5-NS

5-PS

_ _

3 ._

SNS

..- 3

- 3 ~--- 3

33H2O03

CAH FC PCR SCR DWS

V

Cn~k 0.0 to

3.8

Grs~n River

RIVER

HARDIN

_~ HARDIN

~ SNS

S~NS

3

3 3 3

~

3~

,

_ 3 _

_ _

3

3_.

tn320oe

_WAH, FC, PCR, SCR, DWS

VN~

Cr..k

1o.e a ~2.s

Grs.n Rover

_ RNER -- -

R3 3

_ __ ._ 3HR003 _

3H/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

_..------_.---

VN

Cnsk B.4 to t0.e

Green Rfwr

5770007

_ _

HARDMI

WAH FC

DWS

f~~

305(b) At/

Ml Rte, 2000

W~M~rs Creek 0.0 b 2.5

WNeh Crssk 0.0 fo

78.4

Grwn River

Grwn River

RNER

RNER

5170001

5710003

LARUE

BUTLER

SIMPSON

SIMPSON

SBICHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN

2-FS

2 -FS

3 33 3

3 33 3

As~~s~ D~t~

~ 311/2003

3H/2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC, PCR 3CR

Wut fork d DrMut CnWt 0.0 to 23.3

Win Forfc d Onkn Cnelc 28.7 to 32.1

_Wut Fork W Drake Cnsk R~~ervok

W~at Fork of Pond River 1.8 to 8.7

West Fait d Pond River 20.3 to 28.0 _

GrNn Rlwr

GrNn River

Grs~n Rfwr

C xwn River

Grwn River

RIVER

RNER

RESERVOIR

RIVER

RNER

5710002

5110002

5110002

5110008

5710008

2 -FS

2 -FS

35~p3

SNS

2-FS

3 32-Fg

3

3 3 32-Fg

3

5-PS

~SPS

~3 3 3

3 3

~2-FS

3 3

1I4200B - 7178f2009

1 4/1911007

1/29!2008

1 /1012009

1 2nOt2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR 3CR

W~tl Fork d Pond River 8.7 to 20.3

_VY

olf Burch DNrh 0.0 to 4.1

Gn~n River

OrNn Rlwr

RNER

RIVER

5110006

5110005

CHRISTIAN

DAVIESS

2 -FS

bP$

2-FS

33 3

3 33 3

17/12/2002

~2H7/2002

WAH FC, PCR 3CR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wolf Lids CrNk 0.0 to

14.8

Green Rlv~r

RIVER

5710003

LOCAN

SPS

2-F8

33

31H0200B

WAH FC PCR SCR

ArtwW~ Cn~k 0.0 to 10.8

Rlver

RNER

5100205

GRANT

SPS

33

33

712Z/1BDD

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bads C

►Nk

0.0

to ~

.7K~

ntud

c R

fwr

RN

ER

5100

205

GAR

RARD

2-F$

33

33

8/17

N89

9W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRBN

R

un O

.Oto

2.9

Rlw

rR

NE

R51

0020

5AN

DERS

ON

5-PS

33

33

1W1/

lOW

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

DW

SB~

&~

O.O

l0 4

.9

_K~

rMud

c R

iver

RN

ER

5100

205

BOYL

E3

5-N

S3

33

1!31

1200

8W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRBa

Nsf

ak B

.31o

11.3

K~nt

uck

RWsr

RIV

ER51

0020

1IW

OTT

5-N

S3

33

39H

7N99

9W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRCr

s~k

OA

to 4

.8K~

ntud

c R

iver

RIV

ER

_51

0020

5LI

NC

OLN

35 -

NS

33

32/

7200

8W

AM F

C P

CR S

CRFo

rk O

A l0

2.7

_

_ _

_

Kant

udcy

Riv

KR

IVER

RN

ER

5100

205

FAYE

TTE

AMPS

33

~ 2

-FS

3~

312

/751

1989

1229

/199

9W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CRW

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR

Fak

3.~

to 5

.9K~

ntud

t R

IWr

5100

205

FAYE

TTE

~ 2-

F33

32 -

FS

~ ~Bs

~la

Run

O.O

!01.

9 _

~_

`_

.._

._ Ks

Mud

cY R

iver

__

_

RIV

ER_.

..

RN

ER

_._.

.._

RES

ERVO

IR. _

-•-

RN

ER

_ . ._

- --

- RIV

ER

__ 51

0020

5 _

., W

OO

DFO

RD

._LE

SLIE

_._

POW

ELL---

F RAN

KLIN

.

5-N

S..

.__

2fS

- 3- --

-

.. 3 3 3

---

3 3

__ 3

_-•

3 .

-3-

-3- 3

..3

.._. _

_ _.

-- -

-.2;

FS _

- -

- 3_

._ .

__-

-3

-• -

--3

----

--3

.-

3 3-

-

3/31

2005

-

--

WAH

, FC

, PC

R, S

CRB~

echF

ork

O.Ot

OB.O

---- -------

BNch

For

k R

~wrv

dr -

----

---•

---,

--

Riw

f..~

12/2

9119

99 -

--- W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRKx

k R

IvK

. .51

0D20

2_

..._

5100

204

_51

0020

52-

F3 3~

3H8l

2005

--

--

WAH

, FC

C PC

R, S

CRB~

rwon

Cns

lt O

.Oto

~.8

------

K~rk

uck

Riv

er--

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

----

B~nw

n C

n~k

22.1

to 2

5.7

B~nw

nCn~

k 4.

B 10

8.7

-------

----

- --

K~nt

udc

Riv

er51

0020

5_

---

AND

ERSO

N- S

PB

Y-FS

-3

__72

3H99

9 --

9H7H

9B9

---

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Rlv

sfR

NE

R57

0020

5FR

AN

IaIN

S -PS

--- 3

33

_.

7Q3J

1999

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Bens

on C

nelc

8.7

to 7

3.4

K~nt

udc

Riv

erR

NE

R51

0020

5FR

ANKL

INS -

NS3

33

371

23!1

999

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

BerN

Wtl~

r Re

serv

oir

Riv

erRE

SERV

OIR

5100

204

AAAD

ISON

33

33

2-FS

3!72

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

BM C

ombs

LMce

K~nt

udc

Riv

erRE

SERV

OIR

5100

203

CU

Y2-

FS3

33

2•FS

3@7@

004

CAH

FC

PCR

SCR

B' C

~I~b

oa~

Crea

k O.

O l0

2.2

K~nh

idc

Riv

erR

IVER

5100

204

WO

LFE

2 -FS

33

33

3IBr

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

B'

Crs

~k 0

.3 to

8.0

Kenh

rdc

Riv

erR

IVER

5700

201

BREA

THIIT

5-PS

33

33

1o12

5N99

9W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRB

Cns

ic O

.O l0

3.1

Rlw

rR

NE

R51

0020

7PE

RRY

33

33

3W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRB'

C

n~k

O.O

lo,.3

K~nW

ck R

iver

RN

ER

5100

203

CLAY

2-FS

33

33

12/1

9119

99W

AH F

C P

CR

SCR

B D

ry B

ench

0.0

to 1

.2R

IvK

RIV

ER51

0020

3CL

AY2 -

FS3

33

31?

/29H

99B

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

B D

oubl

y C

n~k

0.0

to 4

.4R

lwr

RIV

ER51

0020

3C

LAY

2-FS

33

33

1l1/

20W

CAH

FC P

CR

SCR

B LM

xN C

reak

3.8

to 8

.4R

iver

RIV

ER51

0020

2H

ARLA

N2 -

FS3

3_

3 _

.3

10/4

/200

4W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRM

lddb

fork

Elf~

hs C

n~k

OA!0

1.5

Rfw

rR

IVER

5100

2D3~

CLAY

2 -FS

33

33

1H/2

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

DW

SB

S'

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

14.7

Riv

er_ _

RIV

ER51

0020

4ES

TILL

2-FS

33

_

_3

312

/29H

989

CAH,

FC

, PC

R, S

CRTw

in C

nsk

0.0

to 3

.8R

iver

RN

ER

5100

205

OW

EN5-

PS3

33

37f

23N

999

CAH

FC, P

CR S

CRB

Willa

rd C

n~k

O.O

to ~

.5Ib

ntuc

k R

iver

RIV

ER51

0020

1PE

RRY

5 -N

S3

33

39H

5l19

9BW

AH F

C P

CR S

CRBI

II Br

~neh

0.0

W 0

.3K~

ntud

c R

NK

RN

ER

5700

202

LESL

IE2 -

FS3

33

31H

/200

5W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRBI

Foftt

2.8

to B

.8IC

~ntu

dc R

fvsr

_R

NE

R51

0020

4LE

E2-

FS3

33

31 W

4R00

4W

AM F

C P

CR S

CRBl

~dt C

n~k

0.0

to 4

.0R

ivK

RN

ER

5100

204

POW

ELL

2-FS

33

33

31'61

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Bkw

Lld

t O.O

l0 4

.1R

iver

RIV

ER51

0020

5LI

N L

N3

5-NS

33

32N

f100

sW

AH F

C P

CR S

CRBo

nn&

arxh

O.O

to2.

1I(~

ntud

t R

iver

RIV

ER51

0020

1KN

OTT

2 -FS

33

33

9120

H999

WAH

FC

PC

R S

CRg~

~KW

Mue

k R

iver

RESE

RVO

IR51

0020

5G

RANT

5 -PS

33

33

3l2Z

I200

4W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RBo

orM

Cre

ek 0

.0 to

7.4

K~ng

idc

Riv

erR

IVER

5100

205

FAYE

TTE

2 -FS

33

33

3/~R

005

WAH

FC

PC

R S

CR

_Bo

or»

Crw

k 7.

4101

2.8

K~nt

udry

Rfw

rR

NE

R51

0020

5FA

YETT

E5 -

PS5-

N8

33

312

HSH

969

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

_

Boom

Fak

1.S

l03.

3K~

Mud

c R

iver

RN

ER

5700

201

BREA

THIT

T2-

FS3

33

39H

SI19

B9W

AH F

C P

CR S

CR&

uth

CrN

k O

A l0

6.6

K~nl

uck

Rlw

rR

IVER

5100

2WPO

WEL

L5 -

PS__

_3 3 3

- 3 3 3

-

3 .

- 3

_--

_-

3 -

_- -

- --

3

---

3--

--3_-

- •- - -•

3

- -

~ -

---

-

9 ...

_-

-..

3 3 3-

3-

- 3/

2110

01 - - -

7HI7

9B9

---

9/20

1199

9 _

7f2?

1798

9 _

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

_ _

_ .

---

Brw

h C

rMlc

0.0

to 0

.7-

K~nh

idc

Riv

er--.

.._ ,

_ _

.R

IVER

_ ..

.----

RIV

ER-

- R

IVER

-•--

~ R

IVER

-

-• -

. --

RIV

ER-_

_ ._

5100

205,

.5 1

0020

/--

S10D

203

- 51

0020

5--

__

. O

WEN

ESTI

LLO

WS

IEY

__,_

,

..2 -

FS2 -

FS2-

F8~

2-FS

-

~ ~ 5

-PS

--

WAH

, FC

, PC

R, S

CR,

~_

_Bu

ds C

rwk

D.0

to 2

.3_

~~

Y R

iver

Rfw

r3

-- 3-

3 3•-

_ W

AH F

C P

CR 3

CR

Buds

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

4.0

-.T

. -- --

WAH

FC

, PC

R. S

CRBu

ds R

un 0

.0 W

5.7

K~M

uekY

R~w

r-

Riv

er-

OW

EN3

_ 1/

1120

05-

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Budc

han

Cn~

k 2.

1 to

8.8

"----•-----

5100

201

BR ~l

33M

I200

5W

AH F

C P

CR

SCR

Buck

hom

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

2.4

~

- --~

----- -

Riv

erR

NE

R57

0020

1E

ftEA

5 -N

SS

NS

33

34f

3r20

08W

AH F

C P

C SC

Rg~

qm

~ --. _

---~

.. ---

Riv

erRE

SERV

OIR

5100

202

PER

RY

2-FS

35 -

PS3

2-FS

tl15I

Z005

WAH

FC

, PC

R S

CRBu

ffab

Cne

lc O

.O!0

1.8

BuN

Cre

ek 0

.0 ro

2.0

KIM

R

iver

Rfv

~rR

IVER

RIV

ER51

0020

351

002D

3O

WSL

EYIW

OX

2-FS

b -PS

3 33 3

3 33 3

3Mr2

006

7/2

/199

8W

IW F

C, P

CR S

CRW

AH F

C P

CR

SCR

BuIIG

~Mt

O.O

to1.

7K~

Mue

lc R

iver

RIV

ER51

0020

2LE

SLIE

2-FS

33

33

1ZH

3H~6

BW

AH F

C P

CR 8

CR

Bullo

ck P

sn C

ask

0.0

to 1

.5K~

ntud

c Rh

rsr

RIV

ER51

0020

5BO

ONE

2-FS

33

33

7/22

H94

DW

AH, F

C P

CR S

CRg~

~ pM

~~

RN

~tRE

SERV

OIR

5700

205

GR

ANT

5~P3

33

32-

FS3/

22/2

004

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

BuIlN

cin C

nNc

0.0

to 1

3.9

Riv

erR

IVER

57C

LAY

2-FS

33

39

i W

1l19

89W

AH F

C P

CR S

CR

i ~D

305(b) As

aeasment Res

ults

, 2008

a r O

------.---.__..

Wabr Bodv Tvw

E-plait HUC

.. ~SIO~IL_.._

WOLFE

POWELL

_ BREATHITT

_

. _

2 -FS

~t~.

3a~~

2-FS

Ehh Con~umotion

3~.......

2-FS

Mess Wh

_ . _..

3 /1612005

--- 12N5H~

9I16H999

D*slan~t~d Ups

-C

on C

l.Nu

_.___,_,_ _^_ __

---r

_ K~Mugcy Rlvx ~ _R ESERVOIR.

K~rNuck RivK

RIVER

KxMudt R

-~

Iv~ - RNER _ -

Riwr

~ RNER

R {wr ~

RIVER

5700204

._

-WAH FC PCR SCR

Cans CreMc 0.0 to

3.7 ----- ------ • - --• --

51002W

6100201

_-5100205

5100205

. -2-FS

_ 2_FS --

5 -NS

3 3

._3

3 3~ WAH. FC. PCR. SCR

WAH FC PCR 8CR

C~Cn~k O.Olo9.5

-----

--•---

Cans Run 0.0 to

3A __ .__ ___ __

~ ^+

,A-NS

-_----

_ - --

.-- 3

SCOTT

SCOTT

5 -NS

5 -PS ~

35-NS

3 3

--

3 33 3

9rzW19C9

7N/1986

WAH FC PCR 3CR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cans Run 3.0 to fl.6

Cris Run 9.8

to 17.4

Riwr

RIVER

5100205

FAYETTE

5 -NS

SNS

33

311111999

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

CreNt 0.0101.5

River

RIVER

5100205

OWEN

5-PS

33

33

10/~r2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cams CnNc 0,

0 W 0.5

K~rMuck

River

RNER

5100202

BREATHITT

2 -FS

33

33

9~OrZ005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cart CtNk R~ufvdr

K~Muck RivK

~ RESERVOIR

5100201

KNOTT

5-PS

35-PS

33

8N8/2005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Crr Fork 0.0 to S.B

Carr Fork 15.810 28.4

~Cart Fak 5.9 to

8.9

----- --_-- -

_ ~_

WrNudcy Rfwr _~ _

_ RNER

K~ntudcy River

RIVER

K~MudcY Rfwr

RNER - . -

-K~Mudcy Rival

RIVER

5100201

PERRY

32-

FS~ 2 -FS ~

4A-PS

4A-PS

33

9I30@oo5

WAH FC PCR SCR

5100201

- - _51

0020

1KNOTT

_PERRY ._

5 -NS

5-NS

33

8H9I2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

4A -NS2 -

FS~~

3 ~~

38H8/2005

~ CAH FC PCR SCR

Cat Creak 0.0

to 8.0

_,_ __ __ ._ y_

C

Crwk O.Olo0.8 .__

__.

~ 5100204

POWELL

5-PS

33

33

3/~r2005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

K~MudcyRiv~rrt

RNER

K~nludcy River ~ RNER

_5700204

JACK30N

~ 2-FS

3

~3

3 3 3 ~

__ 2B~ .____

3 3

~

39I2W79G~

WAH FC PCR SCR

C~Gr Cn~k 0.0 ro

4.2

5100205

LINCOLN

2-FS

~5-PS

2-FS

5-PS

33

3M1/1999 ~

WAH, FC, PCR, 3CR

Gdr CrsNt 0.0 ~ 8.

4K~nluck

River ~_ RNER

5100205

OWEN

~~ LINCOLN

1 (VOLFE

2-FS 3

~3 3 ~

2-FS

2-FS 3

~3

3_3 _

3

1H/1005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

CWr Cn~k I.Nu

Kentucky Rfv~r

RESERVOIR_

5100205

819f20W -1N812008

~WAH FC PCR SCR

Clrrnbwi Fork 0.7101.1

K~Muck River

RIVER

5700204

_10/~I2004

__

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

C

Run 0.0 to

0.9

__ _

River

RNER

5100205

SCOTT

2 -FS

33/4!2005

~ WAH FC, PCR SCR

CMataCn~k O.Ol02.8

It~ntudc River

RNER

5100204

WOLFE

2-FS

33

33

3/U2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

T CnNc O.O to ~

.4River

RNER

5100204

WOLFE

2 -FS

33

33

1/6@000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cl~rlu Cn~k 0.0 b 5.2

RIvK

RIVER

5100205

GRANT

2-FS

33

33

10/4@OW

WAH FC PC SCR

Cleki Run 0.7 M ~.0

River

RIVER

5700205

BOYLE

SPS

5-NS

33

311/752007 -1f31R008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cluki Run 4.0 to

8.3

KeMudt River

RNER

5100205

BOYLE

SNS

SNS

33

311

37!2

002 -11H5/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cluk~ Rtn 8.3 to

14.3

K~Mudc RWar

RNER

510D205

BOYLE

SPS

5-NS

33

39/3012005 -1/d1@008

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

kk CnNc 0.0

to 5.5

Rfwr

RNER

5100205

OWEN

2-FS

33

33

711rt000

WAM FC PCR SCR

Cls~r Cn~k 0.0 to

9.0

K~nluek

River

~ RIVER

~+

5100205

WOODFORD

2-FS

33

33

314!2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Clemons Fak 2.2 to

I.B

K~MudcY River

RNER

5100201

BREATHITT

2 -FS

33

33

3/48005

WAH FC PCR SCR

CI

CnNc 0.0 M 2.0

K~MurJcY Rhr~r ~

RNER

~~5100204

~WOLFE

2-FS

33

33

3lBf

2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

__ _,_ _.

Co1N Fork 0.0 to 5.5

KarMuck

River

__

RIVER

5100207

BREATHITT

2 -FS

33

2-FS

3SN911960

WAkI FC PCR 3CR

Collkw Fork 2.4 to

8.3

K~nludc

River

RNER

5100203

CLAY

5-PS

33

33

12H317999

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

C

Fork 0.0 to

7.9

K~Mudc River

RNER

--

RIVER

..._

--

RNER

5100201

BREATHIIT

-&PS

-- 5-P3 -

32-FS

3-

35 -NS

3

3-3

-- 3 9

3---- ~ -3 ----

- --- 8 - _-

~ ~ 3

3- 3 9

9H5H99D

WAH, FC PCR SCR

CnNc 2.2 b 5A

--------

CrwkO.Oto 22 -- -----• ~-- -

'-' K~Mudc River

5700205-

5100205

.ROCKCASTLE'

~ LINCOLN ~

-- 3!7@004

------ 2

/48000 -

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

RW~r '

--

WAH~ FC, PCR SCR

~~ Oyu ~

K~nfuck RWa

RESERVOIR

5100205

GRANT

36/3l20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cow Crwk O.O l0 2

.7Rlwr

RIVER

51002W

ESTILL

2-FS

33

2-FS

312115/1909

WAH FE PCR SCR

Cow C

►Nk

0.0

to 2.

7Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

0020

3O

WSI

EY2-

FS3

33

377

2/19

9DW

AH F

C PC

R SC

RC

Crw

k 0.

1 to

~.0

K~nh

rdc

Rive

rR

NER

5100

205

WO

ODF

ORD

2-FS

33

33

9120

1200

5W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CRCr

r~s

Crs~

k O.

O l0

5A

Rive

rR

NER

5100

203

CLAY

5-PS

33

33

1 W4f

2004

WAH

FC

PCR,

3CR

Croo

kW C

reek

0.0

to 7

.3R

ivx

RN

ER51

0020

4ES

TILL

2-FS

33

33

2122

000

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

atM

Cn~

k 0.

0 to 2

.3K~

nlud

c R

fwr

RN

ER51

0020

1LE

E5 -

PS3

33

331

7120

04W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RCu

bMn

CnN

c 9.

7 to

10.7

K~nt

udcy

Rfw

rRI

VER

5100

202

LESL

IE5 -

PS3

33

33!

7@00

3W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRDM

Nbd

Cre

ek O

A to

1.8

~K~

Muc

k Rf

v~r

RIVE

RRI

VER

RNER

~RN

ER ~

_

5100

201

KNO

TT2 -

FSSN

S5 -

NS3

391

3W20

05W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CRDi

x W

wr

O.O

l0 3.

1K~

rNud

cy R

iver

5700

205

GAR

RARD

2-FS

33

33

221/

2005

WAH

FC,

PCR

SCR

Dix R

iver

33.3

to 38

.1Ri

ver

5100

205

GAR

RARD

2 -FS

5-NS

2 -FS

33

2/23

lZ00

5 -1

/312

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

DbcR

iwr3

6.11

o~3.

E Y

K~M

udc

Rive

r51

0020

5Ci

ARRA

RD3

SN

33

3 ~

31(

31/2

009

W/W

FC

PCR

3CR

DbcR

iver8

4.31

073.

35Ri

ver

___

_

RN

ER

__.RN

ERRI

VER

~

5100

205

LINC

OLN

36-

NS3

_ _

33

1/31

2008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

DbtR

ivsr

73.3

5to7

8.7

K~rM

udc

Rfw

r51

D020

557

0020

4RO

CKCA

STLE

35-

NS3

__

__

33

1/d7

1200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RFo

rk O

.O l0

2.3

~K~

tNud

t R

ivx

WO

LFE

2-FS

33

33

1110

/200

0W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RD n

ku

Com

ic 1.

15 to

7.3

14M

udc

Rive

rRI

VER

510b

205

LINC

OLN

2-FS

5-NS

33

31/

1119

99 -

4M20

0EW

AH F

C PC

R SC

RDr

wr~o

n Cro

ak B

.7 l0

12.2

K~rM

udc

Rlw

rRI

VER

5700

205

HENR

Y2-

FS3

33

33/

7/20

05W

/W F

C PC

R SC

RCn

Nt

O.O l

0 9.

,5Ks

ntud

c R

lwr

RN

ER51

0020

4M

ADIS

ON

2 -FS

33

33

1/72

000

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Run

O.O

to 3.

1Ke

nlud

c Ri

ver

RN

ER51

0020

5SC

OTT

5 -PS

33

33

7?/1

6H99

9W

AM F

C PC

R SC

RDu

de F

ork

0.0

to ~.

EK~

ntud

c R

We

R►VE

R51

0020

4LE

E2 -

FS3

33

31H

4200

0W

AH F

C PC

SC

RCr

Nk

15.3

to 28

.5R

htir

RN

ER57

0020

5O

WEN

2-FS

5 -PS

2 -FS

33

2124

/200

5W

AH F

C PC

SC

RE

Cn~

k 50

.810

5a.5

Rive

rR

NER

5100

205

GRA

NT5-

PS2-

FS2-

FS3 ~

34/

2120

05 '

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

E N

Cns

k 31

.810

38.5

Rlw

rR

NER

5100

205

GRA

NT5 -

NS3

33

3~f

2008

WAH

FC

, PCR

SCR

Es t

Fork

Ind~

n Cr

eek

0.0

to B

.5K~

nhick

Rive

rRI

VER

5100

204

MEN

IFEE

2 -FS

33

33

12HI

196o

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

E~sl

Fol

k MIII

CnN

c 0.

0 to

3.1

K~M

udc

Rlv~

rR

NER

b100

205

CARR

OLL

2-F3

33

33

723H

999

WAM

FC

PCR

SCR

DWS

EutF

orkO

tt~rC

n~k

O.O

lo2.

7R

{wr

RIVE

R51

0020

5M

ADIS

ON

_5

-PS

33

33

_ 12

H7M

9oB

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

Eut H

idtm

~n

12.8

l0 7

4.0

Rive

rR

NER

5100

205

FAYE

TTE

3SN

S3

33

72Q

200D

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

305(b) Au

~t RewRs, 20

08

River

Rlva

River

Riwr

I (antucky River

Rlwr

K eMuck River

RNER

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RE3ERVOIR

5100205

510020

5100203

5700205

5100205

5 100202

5100205

FAYEiTE

MENIFEE

LESLIE

OWEN

FRANKLIN

LESLIE

OVYEN

5-PS

2 -FS

2 -FS

5 -PS

2-FS

2 -FS

5 -PS

SNS3 3 3

2B 5 3 3

3 3 3 32 -

FS 3 3

3 3 3 35 -pS 3 3

E ast Hickman Cnslt 4.2 to

10.2

Edwvd &anch 0.0 ro

7.7

Eli~ha Crwk 0.8 to

1.8

Eqc CnNc 0.0 to

1.8

Elkham Cn~k OA to 18.2

__ __

ENchom CroNc 0.8 to 3.7

_EknerDwis LNce

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

1f2M2000

3 18!2001

3 l4f200.5

9 /1911999

3 /1/2005

90/2005

Bf312004

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

WAH, FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Emil Run 0.0 to 3.9

KerMuck

River

RNER

5100205

CARROLL

2-FS

33

33

IJt11998

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ev~ru Folk 0.0 W 3.D

Rivar

RNER

5700204

ESTILL

2-FS

33

33

317f2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ftllf

Rode Bnneh 0.0 to

0.7

K~nhidc

River

RIVER

5700201

BREATMITT

2-FS

33

33

3!7/2005

WAH FC PCR 3CR

F I

LNt~

K~rriudc RWsr

RESERVOIR

510D201

LETCHER

2 -FS

33

33

8/3/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Five MiN Cn~k 0.0 to

2.7

River

RIVER

5100205

HENRY

2 -FS

33

33

921N9DD

WAH FC PCR SCR

Flat CENk 0.0 to

7.1

River

RIVER

5100205

FRANKLIN

S~PS

33

33

M1/1989

WAH FC PC SCR

Far Mib CnNt 0.0 to

7.4

K~nlud~ Rfwr

RIVER

5100205

CLRRK

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Fresm~n For1c 0.0 t

o 1.4

River

RIVER

5100202

BREATHITT

2-FS

33

33

12H7H999

WAH FC PCR SCR

F &r~chO.Olo3.4

Rhror

RNER

5100205

LINCOLN

35-

NS3

33

2HI20DB

WAH fC PCR SCR

Froza~ CnNc 0.0 W 13.9

River

RNER

5100201

BREATHITT

5-pS

33

33

10/420W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Grn~ F~tm Wu

__River

RESERVOIR

5100205

FRANKLIN

33

32 -

FS3

1/31/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

G~ral BuWr Sl

its P

ark Lake

K~ntudc R{vx

RESERVOIR

5100205

CARROLL

2-FS

~ 3

33

38l3l2W4

WAH FC PCR SCR

Gllb~rts B Cn~k 0.0 to

5.1

Rivx

RIVER

5100203

LESLIE

~ LI NCOLN

~ LINCOLN

2 -FS 3

~~ 32-F8

2-FS ~

3 ~ 33 3

3 3 3 ~~~

~~~

~ 3

_ __

_ 3

._3 3

~

39l21N999

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Gilb~rt~ C~k 0.0 to 7.2

K~Mudcy River

RNER

RNER

_ _ RNER

~ 5100205

5 100205

3WAH, FC PCR SCR

Gilbsrt~ C

rsNt O.

D Io 4.25

K~Muck Rlver

5-NS

3 3 3 3

31!31/2008

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

GIIb~rU Cmk 0,

0 b 2.8

K~Mudcy Rive

r5100205

ANDERSON

3 8~3

3 ~

912012005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

GlimonCnelc O.Olo5.5

_K~Mudc River

_ RNER _._

51002W

WOLFE ~

3 3 3

_, 3

!7/2001

_3172005

7/22l19GB~

WAN FC, PCR SCR

__

GIWi~Cn~k 0.37107.28

River

RIVER

RNER

5100204

MENIFEE

~~~ 2-

FS_

WAH FC PCR SCR

Gl~nra Creek O.Ol05.2

River

5100205

FRANKLIN

2-FS

33

WAH FC PCR, SCR

___ ____

Goow Creek 0.0 to

1.8

__

KeMuck River

___RNER

5100205

SHELBY

5-PS

33

33

7f22/1999

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

Goons Cts~k 0.0 to

8.3

K~ntudc

River

RNER

5100203

CLAY

2 -FS

52 -FS

33

3/7/2005

WAH, fC, PCR SCR

Gooa~ Croak 1.BS t

o ~.2

K~Muek River

RNER

5100205

SHELBY

5-PS

33

33

921179D9

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Goot~ Crs~k 78.91019.9

River

RNER

510DZ03

CLAY

33

33

2-FS

31112005

WAH FC PCR SCR

• Bnrxh 0.0 to

2.3

K~ntuck

Rfwr

RNER

5700203

CLAY

2 -FS

33

33

111012000

WAH FC

DWS

CraNc O.Oto1.1

Rivx

RNER

5100201

PERRY

5-NS

33

33

9H3H9~

WAH FC PCR SCR

(~rsn Run OA to e

.4River

RIVER

5100205

ORMIT

2-FS

33

33

9I18/1~G

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cirs~s Crs~k 0.0 to 10.0

K

River

RNER

5100202

LESLIE

2-F3

33

33

12H3/1998

WAH FC PCR SCR

Grs~f Crssk

12.1 l0 2

2.6

Rivr

RIVER

5100202

LESLIE

2~F3

33

33

9129I199D

WAH FC PCR SCR

Gri~rs C

reek 0.0 to

3.5

K~Mudc Rivet

RIVER

5100205

WOODFORD

2 -FS

33

33

3/7/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Grk~dnans Cn~k 0.1 to 7.9

ICantueky Rfvw

RIVER

5100205

FRANKLIN

2 -FS

33

33

3I22f2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

HNI &~neh 0.7 to

1.2

Rivet

RIVER

5100205

S Tf

2-FS

33

33

1 W~@004

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Hemans Fak 0.0 to

~.9

River

RIVER

5100203

KNOX

2-FS

33

33

3124/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

H

Fork of Dlx River 0.0 W 75.&5

River

RNER

5100205

LINCOLN

2-FS

SNS

33

312H7H99~-111@008

WAH, FC PCR SCR

H

Fork of Dbt Rhnr 15.85 to

24.15

K~rNuck

River

RIVER

5100205

LINCOLN

2-FS

5 -NS

33

37/72/1999 -

4/1/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

H

Fork d Dix Rivet 24

.15 to 27.6

River

RNER

5100205

LINCOLN

3SNS

33

32IU2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

H

Fork of D

bc Rlwr 27.B Io

32.2

Rlwr

RNER

5100205

LIN LN

35-

NS3

33

7JM2009

WAM FC PCR SCR

H~rdwlckCnNc O.Olo3.2

River

RIVER

5100204

POWELL

2-FS

5 -NS

33

312H7H999

WAH FC PCR SCR

Harris C

roNc 0.0 to

E.25

River

RIVER

5100205

LINCOLN

3S~NS

33

32IM200B

WAH FC PCR SCR

H~rti Fork 3.2 t

o 4.2

River

RNER

5700205

MADISON

5B -PS

33

33

1252000

WAH FC, PCR SCR

HatcherCn~k O.O!01.2

R}vsr

RNER

5100204

POWELL

2-FS

33

33

3!8!2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

H~flon Cask 0.0 W 4.2

River

RNER

5100204

POWELL

5-PS

33

33

312f2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

H~ws~ Fuk 0.0 to

4.4

River

RNER

5100207

BREATFgTT

5-NS

33

33

9I10119BD

WAH, FC PCR SCR

HNI Croak 0.0 to

3.5

K~Mudc River

RNER

510D201

LEE

5-PS

33

33

9175/1999

WAH FC PCR SCR

HNI Fa CartNn Crs~k 0.0 to 2.1

K~Mudc Rivx

RIVER

5100202

LESLIE

2-FS

33

33

12N~J1999

- WAH FC PCR SCR

~ ~,yu

----

Keku~k Rhror

RESERVOIR

RIVER

RIVER

5100205 --

5100205

5 1U0205

--- GARRARD

SN8

2-FS

2 -FS-- 5~P8 --

_ 3

2-FS

3H8l2005 _-

WAH fC PCR, SCR

Hkkm~n Creek 8.0 to

25.5

K~ntudc

Rlver

JESSAMINE

5-PS

33

310IU2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hklwun Cn~k 0.

0 ro

8.0

River

JESSAMINE

5-PS

33

_

3 _

3_

2/3/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hkws Cask 0.1 101.9

K~nhx* R

iver

RIVER

5100205

MADISON

2-FS

33

33

3@7J2005

CAH FC PCR SCR

Hol Creek 0.0 b 8.

2 ~

KeN~dc R1ver

RNER

5100201

WOLFE

5-PS

33

33

3!2212005

WAH FC PCR SCR

&~nd1 0.0 to

1.~

Rfwr

RNER

5100202

LESLIE

2 -FS

33

33

3HI2003

WAH FC PC SCR

Cnn Bmd~ O.O to

1.8

IGMudc River

RIVER

51002W

JACKSON

2-F8

33

33

3f22/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hong CnNt 0.0 to

8.3

Rhnr

RNER

5100203

CLAY

5 -PS

33

33

1 W4/20W

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Fak 0.0 to

3.0

K~ntudc

River

RIVER

5700204

ESTILL

2-FS

33

33

4/2/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

H

Creek D.Oto2.8

River

RNER

5100201

BREATHITT

5-N3

33

33

M1N999

WAH FC PCR SCR

a r-~

305(b) Asw~~meM Results, 2008

'~ 1 r N

Indian Crs~k 0.0 to

6.4

Indian CnNt 2.8 to

7.8

KsMuck Rivx

KsMudt Rfva

RNER

RNER

5100205

5100204

CARROLL

MENIfEE

2 -FS

5 -PS

3 33 3

3 33 3

3!22/2005

10/U20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

kxfiri Fork

O.O l0 3.3

^____

K~Muek Rivx

RIVER

5700205

SHELBY

2-FS

33

33

3!22/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

.I~~wnln~Crwk

O.Olo5.3

River

RIVER

RIVER

5100205

JESSAMINE

2-FS

33

33

7HH99B

WAH FC PCR SCR

JWx~ C

~r Fork 0.0 t

o 7.2

River

5100201

BREATHITT

2 -FS

33

3

~3

3/2ZI2005

WAH FC PC SCR

Johnwn Fak D.0 b 0.5 __

K~Mudc Rlwr

_ RIVER

5100204

WOLFE

5 -PS

33

33

1014/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k O.Oro1.5

Kentudc

River

RNER

51002W

POWELL

5-NS

33

33

3Z2oo1

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k 1.Sl03.4

River

RIVER

5100204

POWELL

2 -FS

33

33

912911999

WAH FC PCR SCR

K~ti~s CrNk O.O l0 4

.0Rfwr

RNER

5700203

CLAY

2-FS

33

33

1D/12004

WAH FC PCR SCR

KNns FoAc 0.0 M 1.8

River

RIVER

5100203

CLAY

2 -FS

33

33

SHN994

WAH FC PCR 3CR

K~ntuck

River 0.31011.5

River

RNER

5100205

OWEN

33

35-

NS3

3/912005

WAH FC, PCR 3CR

K~Mudc River 11.8 to

53.1

River

RNER

5100205

OWEN

2-FS

2-FS

32-FS

33 /2005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

K~ntudc RivK 121.0 to

127.4

K~Muek River

RIVER

5100205

MERCER

32 -

FS3

32-FS

3H02005

CAH FC PCR 3CR

River 1T7.4 to

138.7

River

RIVER

_.5100205

GARRARD

1 -FS

1 -FS

1 -FS

1 -FS

1-FS

2/2912005

WAH FC PCR SCR

River 154.O1o210.0

.__ ______

KMhick Rivx

_ RNER

_5100205

JESSAMINE

2 -FS

2 5

2 -FS

SPS

2 -FS

3NOIZ065

WAH FC PCR SCR

K~Muck RNnr 223.35 to 224.35

_ __.

_River

RNER __

5100205

_ ESTILL

33

33

2-FS

3/1012005

WAH, FC

, PCR SCR

K~ntuck

Rlv~r Yl5.9 10 253

.7

___

Kanhuky RW~r

_ RtVER

_ _.

5100204

ESTILL

33

32-

FS3

3f1012005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

RIvB 53.5 W 118.2 -

-•--

K~nluck

Rivx

RNER

RNER

~ 5100205

FRANKLIN

~ 2-FS

2-FS

~ 2-

FS

2-FS

2-FS

28(Sj

___

3 3

2-FS

2122/2005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

1(nob Lids &aneh

0.0 t

o 2.8

KnOblldc Creek 0.010 ~.

e _

_luck Rivx

5700204

ESTILL

LINCOLN

~3

5-NS

3 33

10RR004

_WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Rlver

RIVER

_510020.5

37/22/1999 -

21M2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k 0.0 to

7.25

__ _

KeMuGc RW~r

RIVER

5100204

WOLFE

~ 5-

PS3

33

33f2~/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

LNc~ Rw~

River

RESERVOIR

5100205

MADISON

5 -NS

33

33

613I20D4

WAH FC PCR SCR

LNt~ V

K

River

RESERVOIR

510020.5

MADISON

33

33

2-FS

3123/ 2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

L~~ Run 0.0 to

0.5

River

RNER

5100205

SCOTT

3SB-NS

33

3ZI6f2006

WAH FC PCR SCR

LMxsl Crwk 3.B l0 4

.8Rfv~r

RIVER

5100203

CLAY

SPS

33

33

9129!1999

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lwrni Fork 0.0 to

4.2

Rhr~r

RIVER

5100203

OWSLEY

2-fS

33

33

3lZ212005

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

LNfMrwood Cn~k 0.0 to

4.2

K~Muelc

River

RIVER

5100207

BREATHITT

2-F$

33

33

El1N99B

WAH FC PCR SCR

L..Mi.rv+ood Cn.k O

.e a 8.

2Kentuck

Rfv.r

RIVER

5100201

PERRY

2-FS

2 -FS

33

312/2111999

WAH FC, PCR SCR

L~wood Crs~k 1.7 to

3.2

River

RIVER

5100202

PERRY

2-FS

33

33

12H7N99B

WAH FC PCR SCR

L~

a Run 0.0 to

7.9

Rivx

RIVER

5700205

SCOTT

2-FS

33

33

12H7H999

WAH FC PCR SCR

IN Brxieh 0.0 to 1.0

Rfwr

RNER

5100205

WOODFORD

358-PS

33

32/812008

WAH FC PCR, SCR

LM Fork B DarbN Cn~k 0.0 to

1.5

KeMuck River

RNER

5100203

CLAY

2-FS

33

33

3/72/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Left Fork Buli~b Crack 0.0 to

3. t

ICeMuck

River

RIVER

5100203

OWSLEY

2-FS

33

33

tY/1M19B9

WAH FC PCR SCR

LM Fork EIINw CnNc 0.0 to

3.9

Kin

RNrK

RIVER

5100203

LESLIE

2-FS

33

33

3122/2005

WAM FC PCR SCR

LM Fak Idu~d Cn~k 0.0 to

5.0

K~ntudc

River

R(VER

5100203

OWSLEY

SPS

33

33

M7N996

WAH FC PCR SCR

LNt Fork Milbtm~ Crs~k 1

.8 to

2.9

K~ntudc Rhhr

RIVER

5100201

LETCHER

5 -NS

33

33

3/7212005

WAH FC PCR SCR

R~wrvdr No. 4 9 J~cobs~n Ru~rvoir

K~Mudc Rlv~r

RESERVOIR

5700205

FAYETTE

33

33

2-FS

3/72005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lkk Cr~Mt 0.0 b 5.

~KeMUCk River

RIVER

5100205

CARRQLL

SP3

33

33

1 W812004

WAH FC PCR SCR

LkN Fork 9.1 l017.8

River

RIVER

5700201

LETCHER

5 -PS

33

33

10/Q~20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

LkaFork11.8l027.5

River

RNER

5100201

LEfCHER

2-FS

&PS

33

3~H/1988

WAH FC PCR SCR

LRtl~ C

~oos~ CnNc OA l0 7

.8River

RIVER

5100203

CUY

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Little MkfdN Fak EIIsM CnNc 0.0 to

0.75

K~Muck River

RIVER

5700203

LESLIE

2 -FS

33

33

3/22/1005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Litl

N Mlliwt Bench O

.O !0

1.2

IC~Muck

River

RIVER

5100201

BREATHITT

2-FS

33

33

3!2212005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Litd~ Sudon Cn~k 0.0 to

2.8

K~ntuck

River

RIVER

5700203

CLAY

2 -FS

33

33

M1H9D9

WAH FC PCR SCR

LkU~ Sfnk

Cn~k D.0 to

4.0

K~ntudc

River

RNER

5100204

LEE

2-FS

33

33

8l3W7999

WAH FC PCR SCR

Llltl~ Sbanil~ Crs~k 0.0 to

5.3

K~Mudc River

RNER

5100205

HENRY

~ OWSLEY

2-FS

_2 -

FS2-

FS_ . 5-NS_.

32 -FS

3 3 ~3 _ 3 _ 3

5-NS 3

3

---3 3 3

_3 3 3

~ __

3 3 3._

_ -. _

_ 3 _.

- .._ _

3 3

~3

3 3 3

~ 312212005

WAH FC PCR SCR

LktNS

C~k O.Olo2.8

Kentuck

River

RNER

_

RIVER

_ . _

. RNER_

_ _

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

51002M

1/1H999

WAH FC PCR SCR

Little S

G~Nc 4.B to 8

.8

~K~Mucky Rfv~r

__

K~ntuckY River _

K~Mudcy River

Ksntudcy

Ftiwr

510020A

5100201 -

51 002W

5700205

5100203

OWSLEY

2fd12000

1 W812004

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

LHtl~ W

fII~M CENk OA l0 2

.5 -- - -- -- -

-. -- -

Lids Cnelc O.O l0 2

.6Cn~k 0.0 to

3.15

~L

Fak 0.0 to

2.0

-- PERRY

CLARK

L INCOLN

CLAY

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

..._3

_.3 3

, _._

__

1W,R005

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

WAH FC PCR SCR

Rlv~r

2-FS

39/dD11996

WAH FC PCR SCR

Forst O.O l0 4

,6

~K~nludc

River

RNER

5100201

BREATHIIT

SPS

33

33

3127!2005

WAH FC PC SCR

LoN Cnslt 0.0 to

3.7

River

RNER

5700201

BREATHITT

2 -FS

5-NS

2-FS

33

4/22/2005

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

Lwt Crs~k 3.7 to

8.95

River

RNER

5100207

BREATHITT

5 -NS

33

33

2!612008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ldb Cn~k 0.4 to

7.0

River

RNER

5100201

KNOTT

5-PS

33

33

10f8/20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Latta Croak 1.2108.0

Rfvsr

RNER

5100201

PERRY

5 -NS

33

33

?!82008

W

FC PCR SCR DWS

Cower Bul(No Creek O.O l0 2

.4K~ntudc

Rfvar

RNER

5700203

OWSLEY

5 -PS

33

_3

3M1/799~

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Lower Cry Cn~k O.O l0 2

.8River

RNER

5100201

POWELL

2-FS

33

33

3!8@001

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Lower Dwil Cn~k 0.0 to

4.5

River

RIVER

51Q0201

LEE

2-FS

33

33

9HbH~00

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lower HoodBrr~ch O.O!01.3

Rlwr

RIVER

5100204

POWELL

2-FS

33

33

1/11l198E

WAH FC PCR SCR

305(b) A~

mt Rewk~, 20

08

CLARK

OWEN

CLARK

MONTGOMERY

POWELL

SCOTT

PERRY

----

-JE SSAMINE

SCOTT _ _ _ ..

LINCOLN

~---01NSlEY

_ PERRY V

5-NS

35-PS

32 -F$

~- 28f51 --

- 2 -FS

5-PS -~

5-PS --

3S -P3

2 -FS ' --2-FS3 3 3 3 3 3 -

. 2-FS

.-3 3

5-NS

- 3

3 3 3 3 3-9

- 3

--3

_3 3

- 3 -

2 -FS

3 32-

FS 3 3~----- 3

- _ - 3 ---

-~_

..- 3 --.- - --

3--

--- 3 - -

- - -

8 --

- ---

-- -

- ~-- 3 - --

32-

FS 3 3 3- 3 3 3

- 3

72N7119D9

312312005

12H7H996

212N2007

- 322/2p05 -

--_

12/21H999 __

3 110/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

WAH CAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR OWS

WAH FC PCR SCR

-- WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Mawr ►

io~w

d ~n~

k Z•

85 to

8.2

~~~

~~

uCn

~k O

.Olo

7.3

CteN

t 16.

9bY

2.2

,_Cn

~k 7

•S ►e

18.9

__

^_

__

__

L Fo

rk 0

.0 to

14.7

Ksnt

uck

Rive

rR i

ver

Rive

rK x

Nudc

Rlw

rRi

ver

K ~M

udi

Rive

r.

_ KeM

udry

Rive

r __

RN

ERR E

SERV

OIR

R IVE

RRI

VER

R NER

RNER

~

._- -

-.-

RIVE

R-

__ _

._

RIV

ER

_ _

_--

- _-

RN

ER .

.. _

_-

-- R

NER

R IVE

R --

-_

RN

ER

_

5100

205

5100

205

5100

204

5100

204

5100

2W5 1

0020

5-

6100

201

5 10D

205

_. 5

1002

05

--

---

N ho

a C

rssk

0.0

b 0.

2 _

_-_

- - --

--. -- --

---

---Mrb

h C

n~k

0.05

b 3.

0 --- .

. - -

- -_

_M

cCor

x~ll R

un 0

.0 to

4.4

- •-

-- ----- -

-Ri

ver

_K~

nhrd

cy R

Nnr -

_W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CR~

12/1

7H ~

9W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R&

anch

O.O

to 1

.9

---

- --

A iM~l

ow C

rNlt

0.5

to 3

7-

IC~M

udcr

aim

K~nt

udcy

Rlw

r57

0020

5--

5100

203

--51

0020

23

~_

2H2O

08W

AH, F

C, P

CR, 3

CR3

- --

10/8

1200

4 - -

----

3/31

2005

-- V1

1AH,

fC, P

CR, S

CRM

iddN

Fork

Ri

ver

36.8

to 4

3.8

- ------

IbM

udc

Rive

r3-

-W

AH. f

C, P

CR, S

CRFM

ddl~

Fak

Ri

ver

8.~

to 1

2.8

Mid

dN F

ork

Rive

r 75

,410

75.9

_

Riv

erRi

ver

RN

ER~

RIVE

R51

0020

2LE

E2-

FS

~2-

FS2-

FS3

~3

2/23

/200

5W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R5 1

0020

2LE

SLIE

33

3~

3

2-FS

3M 1@

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SC

DWS

Mid

dle F

ork

Rhn

r 75

.D to

84.

3Ri

ver

RN

ER57

0020

2LE

SLIE

2-FS

33

33

3/12

/200

5W

AH F

C PC

R 3C

RM

iddb

For

k W K

~Muc

k Ri

ver

87.0

to 7

3.4

Rfw

rR

NER

5700

202

LESL

IE5 -

PS5 -

PS2-

FS3

33/

3/20

05W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRMY

ddN

Fork

Qul

dcs~

nd C

rs~k

0.0

W 1

0.0

Rive

rR

NER

5100

201

KNO

TT2 -

FS3

33

392

011D

D9W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CRA ~

ddh

Fork

Rid

Rlw

r 12

A to

15.4

Rive

rR

NER

5100

204

WO

LFE

2 -FS

33

33

323/

2005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Mid

dy F

Ri

ver

a1.5

10 &

1.2

Rfw

rR

NER

5700

202

LESL

IE2-

FS5 -

NS5 -

NS3

3E/

1NZ0

05W

AH F

C PC

R 8C

RM

fN C

nNt

0.0

W 3.

3Ri

ver

RN

ER51

0020

1LE

TCHE

RSN

S3

33

310

/7/2

004

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

MGI

Cra

sk 0

.0 to

5.7

Riv

erRI

VER

5100

205

CARR

OLL

2-FS

33

33

~/1H

9G~

WAH

FC

PC

3CR

MHI

Cre

ek 0

.5 to

B.3

Rlw

rR

NER

5100

205

OV11

EN2-

FS3

33

331

2320

05W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRM

IN C

nMc W

u P

owNl

Rlw

rRE

SERV

OIR

~51

0020

4PO

WEL

L2 -

FS3

33

2-FS

8138

004

WAH

FC

PCR

3CR

AAiN

~rs C

n~k

0.0

to 6.

7 _

Rfw

r_

RI

VER

_ .b7

0020

4LE

E2-

FS2-

FS3

33

12H7

/19D

DW

AH, F

C, P

CR S

CRMille

r &f

r~ch

OA

to 1

.85

K~M

uck

Riv

erRI

VER

5100

201

BREA

THIT

T2-

FS3 3 _ 3- 3

5 -NS

3_

_3

332

3 20

05W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRM

ocks

Bm

eh 1

.8 to

5.7

Rive

rR

NER

-- 51

0020

5BO

YLE

5 -PS 3

5 -NS

2-FS

3 3 3 3

3_-

3 _

_ _3

2 -FS

33/

71/2

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Mor

ris C

nNc

0.1

to 3

JK~

Mud

ry R

iver

RN

ER _

-51

0020

4PO

WEL

L3 -

3-.

WAH

, FC

PCR

8CR

&rx

h O

.O l0

2.2

K~M

uck

Rfw

rR

NER

5100

205

5100

205

OW

ENW

1EH9

~BW

AH F

C P

CR S

CRCn

~k 0

.0 {0

20.2

K~M

uckY

Rlve

rRI

VER

AAAD

ISON

314

/iN99

9W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RCr

eek

20.2

b 29

.2

~ ~

Rive

rR

NER

5100

205

MAD

ISO

N2 -

FS3

33

311

2f20

00W

AH F

C PC

SC

RCr

s~k

2.7 b

,.7

Rlw

rR

NER

5100

202

LESL

IErN

S3

33

39/

3012

0MW

AH F

C PC

R SC

RM

ws~

Nrw

nCn~

k 0.

0109

.0K~

Mud

t R

fwr

RN

ER51

0020

5G

RANT

2-FS

33

33

3/23

x200

5W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRN.

EM

rhwn

Cas

k E6.O

fo 73

.75

Rive

rR

NER

5100

205

FAYE

TTE

5-PS

5 -NS

33

31W

4120

05W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RNo

tr~d

Crs~

k 0.

05 to

1.2

Rfw

rRI

VER

5100

204

ESTI

LL5-

PS3

33

33H

1@00

5W

AH, F

C PC

R 8C

Rrio

ru, e.

~,.on

cr..k

o.e

ro z.o

Rhn

rR

NER

5100

205

FRAN

KLIN

5 -PS

33

33

U1H9

oDW

AH F

C P

C SC

RNo

rth E

lkhor

n CnN

t 0.

710 7

.4R

fwr

RN

ER57

0020

5FR

ANKL

IN2-

FS3

33

37@

4@00

3W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RN

orth

ENd

wrn C

roNc

33.

8 W

34.6

----- -

Rive

r--

- R

NER

'--

RNER

~- 57

0020

5SC

OTT

-

- 3

-3

3-3

---

2 -FS

3/11

/200

5W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RNo

rUi F

ork L

C

n~k

O.O

l0 2

.4Ft

iwr

5100

2WM

0~

2-FS

33

33

3!22

001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

North

FoAc

Nor

th B

oman

Cro

ak O

A to

2.2

K~nt

uck

Riv

erRI

VER

----

_.

_

RN

ER--

-.-_

RIVE

RRI

VER

5100

205

--------

5100

201

._..

5 100

201

5 100

207

FRAN

Ia1N

- -

_ LE

E _

..

5-PS

- -- -

-__

3 3 3

-~ 3

~ MN

S4A

-NS

3 3__ 3

3 3 _

_ -

3~ ~

3

32-

FSU1

/19D

9W

AH F

C, P

CR, S

CR-----

NoAh

For

k of

Rfw

r 1.

3 to

2.3

-K~

Mud

~y R

lwr

-- 3

l11/

20D5

_

WAH

FC

PCR,

SCR

---

NoP

th Fo

lk o

f Ker

Nuck

Rive

r 10

4.1 1

0105

.1Ke

ntuc

ky R

fvsr

PERR

Y2-

FS2-

FS31

1 12

005

_

3HIJ

2W5

WAH

, FC,

PCR

SCR

NaAh

For

k of K

~ndr

dc R

iver

131.

0 to

132.

0R

fwr

LETC

HER

IA-N

S3

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

___

.N

orth

For

k of

Rlv~

r 14

5.5

to 1

47.9

KeM

udry

Rive

r.--

_ _

_---

•--_

RN

ER

__

RIVE

R _

RNER

5100

201

_ _ L

ETCH

ER ---

LETC

HER

-- - 5

-NS_

..

5 -NS

4A-N

S4A

-NS

_. 3 3

____

_..-

. --

- - 3

..- .-

---

3--

3- --

W2e

1200

5W

AH F

C P

CR 8

CR_

.. _ ---

NoN

~ For

k of

Rive

r 1

7,91

0182

.0 __

__

_ __

_N

orth

For

k of K

~Mue

k R

ivet

2.3

to 3

5.8

Kent

ucky

Riv

erK~

Mud

t Ri

ver

5100

201

2 -FS

3/1~

/Z00

5W

AH F

C P

CR 3

CR51

0D20

1_

LEE

3IA

-NS

3_

__

2-F

S3

_3H

1Q00

5W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R. _

~._

Nor

th F

ork d

Ri

ver

35.8

b 47

.2 ~

Riv

er_.

_

RIVE

R51

0020

1BR

EATH

ITT

_2-

FS4A

-NS

2-FS

_3

3?/

24!2

005

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

Nor

th F

ork o

f Ri

ver

X7.2

to X

8.2

K~nt

uck

Wv~

rRI

VER

5100

201

BREA

THIT

T3

M1-N

S3

32-

FS31

1 12

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

NoAh

For1c

d

Rive

r X8

.210

104.

1Ri

ver

RN

ER51

0020

1BR

EATH

ITT

34M

N3

33

3W

AH F

C P

CR 3

CRNp

Ah p

wk

of

Rive

r O.O

101.

3R

fwr

RIVE

R51

0020

1LE

E3

4A-N

S3

33

CAH

FC P

CR 3

CRNa

U~ F

ork o

f R

{wr 1

05.1

ro 1

37.0

K~M

udc

Rive

rRI

VER

5700

201

PERR

Y3

~A-N

S3

33

WIW

FC

PCR

, SCR

NaAh

For

k d

Rive

r 132

.0 !0

145.

5Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

0020

1LE

TCHE

R3

4A-N

S3

33

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

NoAh

Sw

an C

n~k

0.0

W 2

.1Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

0020

5O

WEN

2 -FS

33

33

1017

/!004

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

Olbr

CnN

t O

.Olo

~.7

Riv

erR

NER

5700

205

AM~I

SON

5 -PS

2-FS

2-FS

2 -FS

32!

22/2

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

p~ ~

y

~Kw

ttudc

y Rive

rRE

SERV

OIR

RNER

5700

205

MAD

ISO

N2-

PS3

33

~~2-

FS43

1200

+W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRP~

k~t L

ldc C

nNt O

.O fo

7.5

~R

ivw

5100

205

GAR

RARD -

2-FS

33

3~

3 -

-- -

3 ~

~ 3

~_

3

310

@SM

999

.WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Pin

t Lid

s Crw

k 7.

510 7

2.2

---

-Ri

ver-- R

IVER

-- -

5100

205

MAD

ISO

N ~-

2-F

S3 3

3 33

_ 9H

8H9~

_W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRp~

~ ~

Rive

rRE

SERV

OIR

5100

201

BREA

THIT

TS

NS

3 3 3

_ 8/

3/20

04~

3/81

X01 _

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

pr~i

Md

Cam

Crs

~k 0

.0 b

2.2

K~M

udc

Rhh

rRI

VER

RNER

5100

2W51

0020

5W

OLF

E~ 2

-FS 3

35-

NS3 3

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

P C

w.k

o.o

a e.

~ ~

Rlw

rLI

NCO

LNYl

~120

00W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R DW

SPk

imBr

r~eh

D.O

lo3.

9K~

nhici

c Rh

rer

RIVE

R ~

b100

2WPO

WEL

L5 -

PS3

33

37H

I200

5W

AH F

C P

C SC

Rp~

~

,ptp

,,7

-R

iver

RN

ERb7

0020

2LE

SLIE

5-P3

33

33

9fd0

11~

WAH

FC

PCR

3CR

a r W

305(b) luaeesmant Resufls, 20~

'~ r

K~nluck

Riwr

KeMUCk Rfvx

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

~5100201

5100202

~Y__

LETCHER

BREATHITT

5-NS

SPS

3 33 3

3 33 3

Amt Dab

9 I3W1998

12n1/19D9

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Potter Fak 0.0 to

4.~

Puncheon C

Cn~k O.O l0 3

.2

_QukkwM Cn~k 0.0 to 17.0

K~ntudc i Rfwr

5100201

BREATHITT

5-PS

5-NS

5 -PS

2-FS

~ 3

32/22f2005 ~

WAH FC PCR SCR

Qukkund CroNc 21

.7 l0 30.8

Ksnluck

River

RNER

RIVER

51

1BREATHITf

RNtNm~lc~ Cn~k 0.0 to

7.2

KeMudc Riwr

5100205

33

33

2f8/2008

WAH, FC, PCR, 3CR

GRANT

SNS

33

~ 3

38/16H96B

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

Rid Bkd River O

.O 1015.0

K~rMudt

River

RNER

5700203

CLAY

T-FS

2 5

2-FS

33

3Hr2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Rid Lick Cn~k 0.0 to

8.4

River

RIVER

~5100204

MADISON

5-PS

5-PS

2-FS

33

2/22/2005

WN1 FC PCR SCR

Rid River 21.8 M 30.7 _

K~ntudc Rtwr

RNER

51002W

POVYELL

2 -FS

2 -FS

2 -FS

33

3f312005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Rid RNrer 31.0 to 32.0

Rivet

RNER

5100204

PO

LL3

33

32-

FS3f312005

WAH FC PCR SCR

RW Rlwr 50.1 1080.9

K~Mudc R{v~r

RNER

5100204

POWELL

2-FS

33

33

3/1M2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

RW River 84.1 W 67.8

Rlwr

RIVER

5100204

WOLFE

SPS

33

33

10N2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

RW River 70.01083.9

Rfwr

RNER

5100204

1NOLFE

5-PS

33

33

10N/2004

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Rid River BD.S l0 93

.4K~ntudc Rfwr

RNER

5100204

WOLFE

5-PS

33

33

3114/2005

WAH FC PCR 3CR

RkhlandCnelc O.OtoO.B

KaMudc Rlwr

RIVER

5100205

OWEN

&PS

33

33

1N2l2000

WAH FC,PCR SCR DWS

Fork

Doubly Creek OA l0 2.1

K~Muck River

RIVER

5100203

CLAY

2-FS

33

33

3/312005

WAH FC PCR SCR

R

Fork Bulfab CrsNt 0.0 t

o 2.1

K~Mudcy River

K~ntuck River

RNER _

RNER

5100203

5100203

OWSLEY

LESLIE

5-PS

2 -FS

3 33 3

3 33 3

10!7/2004

3H511005

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

_ _

R

Fork Elith~ Creek 0.0 to 3.3

_

_R

ForkL

CENk O.Ol02.2

_____ __..__

_K~nhrdtyRiver ___

_ K

entudc Rivx

_RIVER

_ _.

_ __ RNER

_.

.- --RIVER

_._

RNER

-- _RIVER

_-RNER-- -,.---

. _RIVER-

-_-

SPRING ___

..,_ 51002W

5100201

__

._ 5100201

_.5100204

-_

_ 5100207

.-

5700202

WOLFE .

L ETCHER

_ BREATHITT

_WOLFE

- -

-- -

- -LETCHER --

LESLIE

_ 5-PS

__5-NS

.. 2-FS

2-FS

- -----

5 -PS

__ -_3_--

. __SNS--

-3

3 3 3 3

3_ __

3_ 3 _

3- --

~ 3

- ~- 3

43 --

3

__

3__

3

_ _

.. _-

-- 3 _

_~.-

3 3

---

- 3

..-

- - --3

-- -

~3

3 31W4l2005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

R

Fork Milldon~ Crs~k

O.O 101.8

___

3N512005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

R

Fork O.Oto0.9

K

River

.

_3 3

- 3--

- S-

--32-FS

---3/15f2005 ---

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

-3!1512005

~ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

-

-------

R

Fork 0.0 to

3.3

- -- ---

_Kentucky River

_Rockhouw Cn~k OA l0 3.8

------- ,-_.-

- K~Mueky River

5-NS

-3

_ 3 -3

- ---9

120/1999

~ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

-- ---------•- WAH FC PCR SCR

Rodchou~~Cn~k ~.Oto5_2 --------------_-

Rosy Fork O.OIo 3.1

_... -•---.----

-K

River

K~ntu~kY River. '

.T

...

WOLFS

- 1W5@005 ~

WAH FC PCR SCR

R

1 0.7 to 0.73 __~______.._.__

K~rkudc

River

- -5100204

5100205

_S

1T

3H5@005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Salt F

ork 0.0 ~ 0.

8Rlwr

RIVER

5100204

MENIFEE

2 -FS

33

.__

_3

33!812001

WAH, FC PCR ~R

Salt R

iver d SbaniN Crs~k OA to 4.5

K~ntuelc Rivv

RNER

5100205

HENRY

5-PS

33

33

7122/1989

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sand Lkk Fork 0.0 b 5.0

KxMuek River

RIVER

5100204

POWELL

4A -NS

33

33

12I21H9D9

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sand RI

Cn~k 0.1 to 3.9

K~rkuck

River

RIVER

5100205

HENRY

2-FS

33

33

3N52005

WAH FC PCR SCR

CnNc O.O l0 3.35

K~ntuck

River

RNER

5100205

OWEN

2 -FS

33

33

3f16/2005

W/1H, FC PCR SCR

S~v~m Cn~k 0.55 to 1.35

K~nludc Rlwr

RNER

5700205

OVYEN

33

33

2-FS

3/152005

WAH FC PCR SCR

3wem Creek 7

.35 to 3.0

KeMuck River

RIVER

5100205

OWEN

2-FS

33

33

3HSI2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

S~xWn Cn~k 0.1 l0 77.2

IGMuek River

RNER

5700203

CLAY

SPS

2 -FS

2-FS

33

2/2Z/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

ShNur CnNc 0.7 101.4

K~MuckY RW~r

RNER

5100205

MERCER

2-FS

33

33

3115!2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

ShNlow Ford Cn~lc 5.9 to

8.9

K~Mudc River

RIVER

5100205

MADISON

5&NS

33

33

128!2000

WAH FC, PCR SCR

S

Rode Fork O.Ol00.8

Rlv~r

RIVER

5700201

BREATHfTT

2-FS

33

33

3HSf2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork 0.0 to 1.4

IC~nI

River

RNER

5100202

LESLIE

2-F3

33

33

10/612004

WAH FC PCR 9CR

Sllwr CroNt 0.0 to

11.1

River

RIVER

5100205

AAADISON

2 -FS

5-PS

2-FS

33

3/2/2005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Sflwr Cn~k 11.2 to 29.8

River

RNER

510020&

MADISON

5-PS

33

33

3N5/2005

WAH FC PC SCR

Sllwr CrNk L~ Lower LNa

Rives

RESERVOIR

5100205

MADI30N

33

33

2-FS

WAH FC PCR SCR

Slhtir CnNc Li

lts

LNts N

o. 2

Rfwr

RESERVOIR

5100205

AAADISON

33

33

2-FS

1N/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sbanlh CnNt 0.1 W 12.8

River

RIVER

5100205

HENRY

2-FS

2 -FS

2-FS

33

2/2112003

WAH FC PC 9CR

Snow CnNt O.O l0 3

.9Rhror

RNER

5100204

POWELL

5-PS

33

33

1 W972004

WAH FC PC SCR

South B~n~on Croak 0.0 l0 5.4

KIM

River

RIVER

5100205

FRANKLIN

2-FS

33

33

M111999

WAH FC PCR SCR

Saulh Elktam Cn~k 5.0 to

18.8

River

RNER

5100205

FRANIdIN

5-PS

33

33

3HEf2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Elktwm CrNk 16.8 to 3A.5

River

RIVER

5100205

WOODFORD

5-PS

SNS

33

33!18/1005

WAH FC PCR SCR

SoW~ Elkhorn Cn~k 34.5 W 52.7

K~Mud~ River

RNER

5100205

WOODFORD

5 -PS

33

33

3118f2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork

River 11.7 W 18.9

K~ntuGt

Rfwr

RIVER

5100203

OWSLEY

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

32-

FS2123/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sa~lh For1c ~uidnand Cn~k OA to 16.9

K~ntuckY River

RNER

5100201

BREATHITT~S

33

33

1 W11@004

WAH FC PCR SCR

_ __

South Fork Rid River 0.0 to 3.9

K~rNuckY Rfwr

_RNER

RNER _

_- -

_ RNER

_RNER

RIVER

51002D4

_ 5100201

~~

-510020A

_POWELL

4A-NS

4A-NS

33

_ __

3-

- 3

-- -.--

_ _ _ .

._ 3

_ ._

3~

3

~

3 3122211969

~ 12171H9B9

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

~

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork Rid Rfwr 3.9 to 10.1

----

-KeNudc Rfwr

----POWELL

33

Sauth Fork ShNon C

Cn~k 0.0 to

9.8

K~Mudcy River

--JACKSON

_2-FS

_2 -FS

5-PS

9 3 3

3 3 3

3_ _

_ 72N5H99D

WAH FC PCR SCR

__ _

So~Rh Fork StNfon C

Cn~k 8.8 l0 28

.3Rhnr

5100204

5100205

JACKSON

34/212000

CAH FC PCR SCR

Creek 0.7106.3

River

BOYLE

331162005

WAH FC PC SCR

Fork 3.1108.9

K~ntuck

River

RNER ~

5100201

BREATHITT

5-N3

33

33

911011996

WAH FC PCR SCR

Branch 0.0 W 1.B

River

RNER

5100203

CLAY

2-FS

33

33

3N/2003

W/1H FC PCR SCR

CnMt O.Ob4.7

River

RNER

5100202

PERRY

5-PS

33

33

70/11f2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

8hnford C Wt~ Rke LNu

River

REBERVOIR

5100205

LINCOLN

2-FS

33

35-PS

6/3/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Stab Rwd Fork 0.0 to ~.0

River

RNER

5100204

WOLFS

2-FS

33

33

3!72001

WAM, FC PCR, SCR

Sutlm C

Cn~k oA to 21.3

K~Mudc River

RIVER

5100204

J CKSON

5-PS

2-FS

2-FS

33

2/12/1005

WAH FC PCR SCR

St~~nxnl118mdi

O.B 101.8

River

RIVER

5100205

ORM(T

SB-PS

33

33

1/28/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

305(b) Adu

~t Rewlis, 2008

St~slss Run 0.0 to

4.2

StNr Fork 0.0 to

2.7

Stwsns Cn~k 0.0 to

1~.~

Stw~ns CnNc 1 .41017.1 _

StlIIwN~r Cn~k 0.0 to

3,5

SUnnsttCreM~ 1.3104.7

S

Cwe Bnnd~ 0.

0 to 2.4

S

Cn~k 8.O to

72.2

S

Crssk 0.8 to 5.4

CreMt x.8108.0

Sul

Croak 0.0 M 1.4

KaNudc River

K ~Mudc River

Rht

irK e

rMudc

River

K entuck

River

River

Rhr

srRiver

K~Mudc Rhrer

KsM

Rhnr

K ~ntudt Rfwr

RNER

RNER

_

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

5100205

5100204

5 100205

5 100205

5700204

5 100202

5100204

5 100204

5 100203

5100205

5100205

FAYETTE

J ACKSON

GRANT

OWEN

WOLFE

LESLIE

POWELL

LEE

L ESLIE

(;ARRARD

HENRY

2 -FS

2 -FS 3

5 -PS

5 -PS

5 -NS

4A -NS

5-PS

2-FS

5 -PS

5 -NS

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

' 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3/1 8@005

3 11812005

7 0113!1989

3N812005

1 a71/2o04

M1l1988

10/11/10x1

1 /12005

1W13/2004

M7H999

WAH FC, PCR SCR

WAH PC PCR SCR

WAH FC, PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PC SCR

WAH,FC PCR 3CR

WAH FC, PCR SCR

WAH, FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Swift C

Cn~k 0.0 to

13.8

Rlwr

RNER

5100204

WOLFE

5 -PS

33

33

77It1199B

WAH FC PCR SCR

TN~Cnsk O.Olo8.5

K~tNudc

River

RNER

51W205

MADISON

5 -NS

33

33

12/22N999

WAH FC,PCR SCR

T~ CrNk 8.5 to

11.5

__ _____

K~ntudcy River

_ RIVER

-...

RIVER

~~ --~ 57

00205

MADISON

2-F3

2-FS

3~

33

1?/22/1999

WAH FC PCR 8CR

Ten Mils Cn~k O

.O l0

2.9

____

K~Mudcy River

5100205

-- 5

100205

~ 5100205

GRANT

GRANT

FAYETTE

~ ~

5 -PS ~

~ 5 -PS

SPS

SPS3

2-FS 3

3-

• - - 3 - --

-~'

3

~

3Z18rz005

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

T hrs~ Forkf Cn~k 0.0 W 7.8

K~MudcY RivK

RNER

~ RNER

~

3W15N 999

WAH FC PCR SCR

Tv~n&~nclt 0.0b8. 2

K~ntudc

River

5-N8

33

_ 3 _3

1N812000

WAH,FC PCR SCR

T own &anch 10.61012.1 _- -

K~Mudc River

RNER ~

5100205

FAYETTE

-- 5-P$ _.

5-NS

5 8-NS

35-N8 3

.3._

~.3 3

_- .

_._ 3 __~,i

3~

3

-

yg/lppp

- --

WAF{, FC, PCR, SCR

Town Burch 9.21010.8

_ ._.___ _

_

K~Muek RivK

RNER

RNER

5100205

.FAYETTE

HENRY

vtenaoo'

WN~I FC PCR, SCR

Tam Cnelc 2.5 to

3.5 ,~.

_ ___ ___

KaMudc River

5100205

31f2812000

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

Trsa Fork 0.15 to

2.4

_

_FGnI

RivK

RNER

5100201

KNOTT

2 -FS

S~N8

5 -NS

33

N79/2005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Troubls~wn~ Cn~k OA to 4

5.1

Ksntudc

River

RNER

5100201

BREATHfTT

5 -NS

2-FS

2-FS

33

2/2812005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Txo Mils Cn~k 0.0 to

3.1

River

RIVER

5100205

OYVEN

33

33

3WAH FC PCR, SCR

U

Devil CroNc 0.0 t

o 1.0

__,___

River

RNER

5700207

WOLFE

5 -PS

33

33

9115/1999

WAH FC PCR SCR

U

Hood Brr~ 0.0 to

1.8

RfvK

RIVER

5100204

POWELL

2 -FS

33

33

1/18f2000

WAH fC PCR, SCR

__

___

U

Fiow~rd CroNc 0.0 to 3.2

___

ICeMuck

Rivar

RNER

5100205

_CLARK

5 -PS

33

33

12/1?J1999

WAH FC PCR, SCR

U

Twin Creek 0.0 W 3.6

Rlwr

RNER

5100202

BREATHITT

5-PS

33

33

1222H999

WAH FC PCR, SCR

UT to

Fak 0.0 to

1.1

River •

RNER

5100205

FAYETTE

4A -NS

33

33

715@003

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to

Cans Run O

.O l0 3

.5Kent

River

RNER

5700205

SCOTT

35-NS

33

312112000

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to

Cawood Bench 0.0 to 2.

1Kentucic River

RIVER

5100202

LESLIE

2-FS

33

33

7/1!2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to

CWr Croak 0.0 to

1.4

RivK

RNER

5100205

OWEN

2-FS

33

33

3IU2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT W Cbr Crwk 0.0 to

~.3

Ksntudc

River

RIVER

510020.5

WOODFORD

2-FS

33

33

1f18200D

WAH FC PCR SCR

UTto E

Fork 0.0 to

0.5

K~rNuek

River

RIVER

5100201

PERRY

5 -NS

33

33

10H320W

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Flit CrNk OA to 1.5

River

RIVER

5100205

FRANIQIN

2-FS

33

33

3!7@DOS

WAH FC PCR, SCR

UT to

Ql~nn~ Creek OA l0 1.9

K~Muck RivK

RIVER

5100205

WOODFORD

2-FS

33

33

3122/2005

WAN FC, PCR SCR

UT M

Fork O.O to

1.3

K~Mudc f

iiver

RIVER

5100205

CASEY

2 -FS

33

33

1 W13ROW

WAH FC PCR' SCR

UT to

J~dcs Cfs~k 0.0 ~ 1.

15River

RNER

5700205

MADISON

2-FS

33

33

3/2212005

WAH FC PCR SCR, DWS

UT to

K~rNuck RNnr 0.7 to 1.4

River

RIVER

5100205

FRANKLIN

2-FS

33

33

3/2?.f2005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

UT to

Lins Fork 0.0 to

0.8

River

RIVER

5700207

LETCHER

2-FS

33

33

3/22!1005

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to

N. Elktwm Cn~k DA to 5

.6K~nturk

River

RIVER

5700205

FAYEI"fE

5-PS

33

33

7 W1U20W


UT W North Bnnd~

Croak 0.0 to 2.2

River

RIVER

5100204

MONTGOMERY

5 -NS

33

_3

32!72008

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

UT to SmHh For

fc 0.0 !0

0.55

RW~r

RNER

5100205

MADISON

5-PS

33

33

3H8@005

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

UT to

SwMt C

Crsdc 0.0 to 1.5

KeMuck itiwr

RIVER

5700204

WOLFE

SNS

33

33

1W7Mt999

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR DWS

UT to T

Branch 1

.0 W 1.6

K~nludcY River

RIVER

RIVER

5100203

CLAY

2 -FS

3 33

3 3

._3 3

101132004

WAH FC PCR, SCR

UT to

Howells Creek

2.7 to

2.7

River

5100205

_ CLARK

2-FS

31H4/2005


W~Mc~r C

roak 0.0 W 5.~

KeMudc River

FINER

5100207

LEE

2-FS

33

33

1WtIH999

WAH FC PCR SCR

W~kxA M~~dow~ Breech 0.0 to 3.9

River

RNER

5700205

hM~ISON

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Wr Cn~k 0.0 to

3.1

K~ntudc

River

RIVER

RIVER

6100201

BREATHfTT

2-FS

33

33

911511999

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Wr Fork 0.0 w 73.8

K~Mudc River

5100204

JACKSON

2-FS

33

33

12NSI1989

WAH, FC PCR SCR

WNl Fork Mill Cn~k O

.O 101.0

Rfwr

RIVER

5100205

CARROLL

5-PS

33

33

7123H999

WAM FC PC SCR

West Fork Otter CnNc 0.0 to

2.8

Kin

River

RIVER

5100205

MADISON

2-FS

33

33

12/17H989

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wwt Fark

Cn~k 0.0 to

2.6

River

RIVER

5100205

GARRARD

2-F8

33

33

3!312005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wut Hkknwn Crs~k 0.0 to

3.0

River

RIVER

5100205

JESSAMINE

S~p3

S~p3

33

312+/200D

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wut Hkkm~n CnNc 3.0 to

8.8

Rhr~r

RIVER

5100205

JESSAMINE

SPS

33

33

1H 8/

2000

WAH FC PC SCR

Whit Lids Crs~k 0.0 to

2.B

River

RIVER

5100205

GARRARD

bPS

33

33

9/16/1989

WAH FC PCR SCR

Whig ONc Creek 0.0 to

2.7

KeM

River

RNER

5100204

ESTILL

33

3.3

3WAH FC PC SCR

Whig ONc Cts~k 0.0 to

2.8

K~nludc Rfwr

RNER

5100205

CiARRARD

S~NS

6~N8

33

310/14200 - 71

37/200E

WAH FC PCR SCR

WhH~ Oak Cn~k 0.0 to

3.4

~Kekuck River

RIVER

5100205

L►NC

OLN

35-

NS3

33

2/1/2

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

yy

~~

~

Rlw

rRE

SERV

OIR

5100

205

MAD

ISON

S~NH

33

33

813r

20W

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

VW~

H~

r R~s

~rvo

ir Lw

wr F

low

rd~

CnNc

~,___

_ _

_~

,_W

olf R

un 0

.0 to

4.1

K~nt

udc

Rfw

rKe

nt

Rive

r

_ .. _

RESE

RVOI

RRN

ER51

0020

551

0020

5CL

ARK

F AYE

ITE

3~ S

PS3

6~NH

3 33 3

2-FS 3

3122

/2005

1/13

/200

0W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RW

AH F

C PC

R SC

R DW

S

a r

305(b) Assaumenl Results, 2008

~+ O~

Kxkudc River

RIVER

KeMudc River

RNER

River _

RESERVOIR

Lids

River

RIVER

5100241

5100202

5700107

5100101

MENIFEE

LESLIE

CAMPBELL

FLEMING

2-FS

SPS

2 -FS

5 -NS

3 3 3~A-NS

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

3126!7998

~ 217L1sDD

912QI2005

2/5!2001

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

WAH FC PCR 3CR

WAH FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR OWS

W

CnNc O.Oto3.3

Wooun Cn~k 0.0 to

3.0

__

0.J.Jol

L.Mcs C

1 L~lulu)

_Al

liwn Crs~k 0.0 to

4.9 __ _

BaNtlick Cask O.O l0 3.5

_L

River

RNER

RIVER

RNER

~ ~

5100101

KENTON

SPS

5-NS

33

322312001

WAH FC PCR 3CR DWS

Bar*IidcCn~k 3.S to 8.2

__._ __.________

8rtklldtCreak 8.21019.2

L

River

5100107

KENTON

5 -NS

5 -NS

33

34/138001

WAH FC,PCR 3CR

L idcirgRiver

5100101

KENTON

5-PS

SPS

33

35/2/2002

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

BNwrCn~k 70.OW14.~

~Lidci

River

RNER

5100101

MENIFEE

5-P8

33

~ 3

33N4/2001

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

B~wKCnNc7.6to75.~

~~LI

Rivx

RIVER

5100101

HARRIS N

2-FS

33

3

~3

1W19l2005

WAH FC PCR SC DWS

Bl~do Cn~k 0.0 to

3.4

L

Rivx

RNER

51001D2

BOURBON

5 -PS

2-FS

~3

33

38H/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

B l~dcw~br Crs~k

3.8 to 11.7

_____ _

_ _ _

L

RW~r

_ RIVER

5100101

MORCiAN

5-NS

2 -FS

3 33

912012005

W

FC PCR SCR DWS

Blanket Cn~k 0.0 ro

1.9

__

_L

River

RNER

51007D1

PENDLETON

2=FS

33

33!4/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

8aorw Crs~k 0.0 to 5

.0River

RNER

5100702

BOURBON

5-PS

33

33

&1/2000

WAH FC PCR 3CR DWS

Gotta Fork O.O l0 2.

1L

Rivet

RIVER

5100101

MENIFEE

2-FS

33

33

1 W2~f2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bowrnn Crs~k 0.0 b 8.0

Rlwr

RNER

510D101

KENTON

2-FS

33

33

1024/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Broke L CnNc 0.

0 to 1A

L

River

RIVER

5100101

MORGAN

5-PS

33

33

1085/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

&ok~ L

Creek 1.0 to 4.~

Rivsr

RIVER

5100101

MORGAN

5 -PS

33

33

8@U2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork O.O l0 2.2

L

Rivet

RIVER

•5100101

PEENING

2 -FS

33

33

U12000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork 0.7 l0 5.6

RWa

RNER

5100101

MENIFEE

2-FS

33

33

10252005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Fak 0.0 to 5.8

River

RIVER

6100101

PENDLETON

5 -PS

33

33

7H3R005

CAH FC PCR SCR

Budc~t BnrK:h 0.0 to

1.9

River

RIVER

5100101

MORGAN

2 -FS

33

33

8!20!2005

CAH FC PCR SCR

Bull Fork 2.4 to 4.4

Lk~c

Rivsr

RNER

_5100101

ROWAN

2 -FS

33

33

10I25C2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bum

Fork 0.0 to 3.25

L

RNrer

RNER

__5100101

MAGOFFIN

5-NS

S-NS

3 ~

33

1.0!2512003

CAH FC, PCR SCR

Cram

Creek O.OM4.2

________

Lick

River

RIVER

510D101

MORC,AN

5-PS

33

33

7J9N999

CAH FC PCR SCR

C~rfl~l~ WM~r

LNa _

_____

l

River

~ RESERVOIR

5100102

NICHOLAS

33

33

2-FS

~ 11!15/2005

WAH, CAH, FC, PCR, SCR, DWS

Cnk

ForkO.Oto2.3

_._____,_

Lickf

River

RIVER

5700101

MORGAN

5-NS

33

33

10127/2005

WAH,FC PCR SCR

C

Creak O.Oro3.9

________

L

River

RIVER

_5100101

FLEMINCi

34A-NS

33

31N2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Cn~k 0.5 b 5.0___

L

River

RNER

5700101

NICHOLAS

33

33

3_

WAH, FC, PC SCR

Caw Run LMa

L

River

RESERVOIR

5700101

ROWAN

2 -FS

35 -PS

SPS

31/32008

CAH FC PCR SCR

CWrCn~kO.Olo1.7

Lkki

River

RIVER

5100107

ROBERTSON

2-FS

33

33

702712005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k O.Olo4.3

L

River

RNER

5100101

ROWAN

5-PS

33

33

SN22001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Clrks Run 0.0 W 2.1

Lakin

Rlwr

RNER

5100101

MASON

5-PS

33

33

10/27f2005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

CofIN Cn~k 0.0 W 4.1

Lkki

River

RIVER

5100107

MORGAN

5-NS

33

33

9f2W2005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Cooky Braneh 0.0 to 2.9

Lkki

Rives

RIVER

5100101

~MONTCaOMERY

2-FS

33

33

M28f2004

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Run D.0 ro

10.1

~River

RIVER

8700702

BOURBON

5-NS

33

~ 3

381212000

WAH, FC PCR SCR

C

Cn~k 0.0 to

I.E

L

RW~r

RIVER

~ RNER~

- -- RNER -----

RNER

---

- --

RIVER

__RIVER

51001D2

GRANT

~2-FS

33

~ 8 ~ 3 '

~~-^ - 3--~- ~-

3

3101272005

CAH, FC PCR SCR

CnkMown Burch 0.0 to _

38

~---~^------ -

-~-

- Lldcirq River

-5100101

-' 5100101

-5700101

- ---- -

5100101

PEENING

-- PEENING

ROWAN

--

-----

ROWAN

5 -PS

_5PS

2 -FS ~

4A-PS

3 3

~ _3 S-3

3--

3x@0/2001

----

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR -

Cr~Cn~k O.Oto2.9

Lkk

River

6/3012004

WAH FC PC SCR

CnMc 0.0 to

5.9

L

River

3 3912W2005

WAH fC PCR SCR DWS

4/9/2001

WAH FC PCR,SCR

---

---

Cr~ CnNt5.91o10.0

Lldck~Riva

__2-FS__

3- 2-FS

35-NS

3~

3 3 3

_ __ 3

__3 3

_._,_._.___

CrookW Crs~k O.D to8.1

Crook~dCnNt0.51o8.8 ------,,. ~-

-----..-----.

Cniis~s Croak 0.0 to

8.8

Dwlls Fork OA to 8.5

_Lkkkq River

5100101

NICHOLAS

3_

_NtU2000

WAH FC PC SCR

LidcinyRWR K

HARRISON__-

310127/2x05

WAH FC PCR SCR

L River

-•----RIVER-.-

-RIVER

_,.5100102

5100101

KENTON

_2-FS

_ 2-FS

3'_---

---

33

316/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lldc

River

RIVER

5100701

MORGAN

2-FS

33

33

9ROr2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

pa R~ ~

L

River

RESERVOIR

5100101

KENTON

5-PS

32-FS

33

Bl28l20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bmcii 0.0 W 2.3

L

River

RNER

5100101

PEENING

5-NS

M1-NS

33

3M1M9BE

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cro

elt 0.0 to 2.5

L

River

RNER

5100107

ROWAN

5-PS

33

33

1027x1005

WAH FC PC SCR

ESC Far1c 0.0 W ~.9

L

River

RIVER

5100101

MORC,AN

5-PS

33

33

~I912001

WAH FC PC SCR

ENc Fork

12.8 to 7,.7

Lidck~ Rhr~r

RIVER

5100101.

MORGAN

S-PS

33

33

N31200D

WAH FC PCR SCR

ENc Pak ~.9 tc 10.5

Lidcin RWx

RIVER

510D101

MORGAN

5-NS

33

33

814/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

E~ gr~

L

Rlwr

RESERVOIR

5100101

ROWAN

33

3_ 3

_2-FS

11H5/2005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

F~mins Bnrxh 1.6 b 3.4

Lkkln

River

RIVER

_.5100707

. MORGAN

5-PS

33

_ 3 __

371/72005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Flit Cn~k 0.0 to 0.9

River y

_RIVER

5100101

BATH

2-FS

5 -NS

3_ 3 _.

3_3

_ 3 _3

3_

_ _ 3__

3 3_

3 ___

__3

3 3 3

~ 3 3

_

1/52001

__B /3f2000

_

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Flit Run 0.0 to 2,2

L

RWer

RIVER

5100702

BOURBON___

SNS

__ 34A-NS

4A-NS

4A-NS

4A-NS

WAH FC PC SCR

_F

Cn~k 12.8 to 18.0

Lids

River

__

_,

RNER

_5100107

PEENING

_

__5 -PS

_ 5-NS ._

_ 5 -PS _ ..

2-FS

1191'2001

_1/Brl001

_

1IBI2001

WAH, FC PCR SCR

-F

Crs~k 20.E to 39.4

-River

- -

---

RIVER

5100101

- -

-_..

WAH. FC, PCR, SCR

_

___

FI

Crs~k 0.0 to 12.8

Lldci

River

__

__RNER

_5100101

_ _ PEENING

_PEENING

WAH FC PC SCR

FNm

Crs~k 18.0 b 20.8

Udci

River

_ _

RNER

5100101

__PEENING

_3

718f1004

WAH FC PCR SCR

p~

~~

River

RESERVOIR

5100101

- PEENING

33

33

2-FS

11/15J2o05

WAH FC PCR SCR

Flou

► C

n~k

0.0

to 2

.2L

Riv

erRI

VER

5100

101

PEND

LETO

N2-

FS3

33

311

/1/2

005

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

Fox

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

10.1

RW~r

RIV

ER51

0010

7FI

EMIN

G5-

PS5-

PS5-

PS2-

FS3

72/E

@00

5C

AH F

C P

CR S

CR

305(b) At

er

~t Reaulta, 2008

V

FLEMING

PENDLETON

MORGAN

MONTGOMERY

MONTGOMERY

PENDLETON

5 -NS 3

SPS

2•FS

2 -FS

2 -FS

32 -FS 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 32-

FS 3

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

8/3/2000

~~~j(~

1 1N2005

7f21f2004

wAH, FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC,PCR SCR

WAH FC PC SCR DwS

Fox Cn~k 20.1 to Yl.7

_

_Gf~it CENk 0.0 to

1.3

CENk~,8M10A

udc Cn.k o.o to a.s

~-

-~- ____

~fl~fl6flR ~.~If!

__________

Omven Cn~k o.5 to

3.4

L River

LI

Rfver

~ Rjye(

a

Rw.r

Ll~cin River

River

RIVER

RIVER

RJR

RNER

RESERVOIR

RIVER

RNER

RNER

510D101

5 100101

5~~0101

5 100102

5 100701

5 100101

3 33 3

8128/2005

1 1/2/2005

WAM fC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hllbboro Brr~ch 0.0 to

2.7

Hk~kgon CreNt 0.0 to

12.8

__

Lidckq Rfvx

Lkkl

River

5100101

5100102

FLEMING

BOURBON

2-FS

2-FS

35-NS

32 -F9

3~~

~ 2-FS

3 33/88005

9 /2W2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

HkilWon Cnslt 20.8 to 31.0

L River

RIVER

5100102

BOURBON

2 -FS

5 -PS

33

38l~2000

WAH FC PCR 8CR

Hk~Wton Cn~k 31.0 t

o 33.3

Lidci

River

RIVER

5100102

NICHOLAS

2-FS

33

33

8/4f2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hinkston Crs~k ~1.Q to X

9.1

Lkk

Rfwr

RNER

5100702

BOUR80N

5-PS

5 -NS

33

38/42000

WAH FC PCR SCR

HiNutonCn~k 51.51085.9

L River

RNER

5100702

MONTf30MERY

5 -NS

33

33

1W1f1999

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

HiNcgon Cn~k 88.0 to 71.5

Rivsr

RIVER

5100102

MONTGOMERY

2-FS

33

33

1/10rz001

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Hk~lutan Crs~k 73.3 to

1~.3

Lld~i

Rlv~r

RIVER

5700702

BOURBON

33

33

2-FS

17!312005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hawlon C»Mt 0.0 to

9.0

L

River

RIVER

5100102

BOURBON

35-NS

33

38I1~R000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Houton Crs~k 9.0 t

o 12.7

Lldci

River

RIVER

5100102

BOURBON

5-PS

33

33

817/2000

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Hutchiwn Cn~k 0.0 to

5.4

L Rfwr

RNER

5100102

BOURBON

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Indian CroNc D.0 to

0.7

L Rfvsr

RIVER

5700102

BOURBON

3.58-NS

5B -NS

33

929rz005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

.lohnton Cnslt O.O l0 3.1

L

Rlwr

RIVER

5100101

MAGOFFIN

3SNS

33

31/9/2007

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Jdxnon Croak 0.0 M 3.5

L River

RNER

5700107

ROBERTSON

~ 2 -FS

SNS

2-FS

3

~3

1~

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

JoMwn Cnslc 74.81021.8

L River

RNER

i RESERVOIR

5100101

PEENING

2 -FS

_~

5-pS

~3 3

32-FS

_,_,._ 3 3

3 3__ W2W2D05 ~- wAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

81268005

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

____

Klnpld LNc~

L RIvK

5100101

PENDLETON

Knot HI

H &arch 0.0 to

2.8

_L

River

RIVER

~~ 5100101

BATH

~--NICHOLAS -

MASON

2-F8

--_ 2-

FSS -PS

3 3 3

32 -FS 3 3

~ 3

- -- -- 3 --

_ -_

3

3~ 11212005

C/W, FC PCR, SCR

Ulcs C~mko

-•---__- --. --

Lk;kMp River ~

RESERVOIR_,

RIVER

5100102

~ 5100701

. 3

~_8@8I2004

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Lws Creek 0.0 M ~.3

L River

3_

1 1/3!2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

LaR Fork Whig ONt CrNk 0.0 to

1.8

River

RNER

5100101

MORGAN

~ Sp3

33

38/112000

WAH FC PCR SCR

LidcCrs~k O.Olo2.1

L River

RIVER

5100101

MAGOFFIN

5 -PS

33

3 ~

31113!2005

WAH FC, PCR SCR DWS

Udci

River O.Oto4.8

Lids

River

RNER

5100101

CAMPBELL

2-F8

b -PS

33

312/8!2005

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Licki

River 102.5 to 703.5

River

RIVER

5700107

NICHOLAS

33

33

2-FS

11!3/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

L R{vsr 110.2 t

o 130.1

River

RIVER

6100101

NICHOLAS

32-FS

2 -FS

32-FS

10!1/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lids

River 14.9 to

21.5

L River

RNER

5100101

CAMPBELL

32 -FS

33

32/812001

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

L River 145.2 t

o 18.8

L R{wr

RIVER

5100101

PEENING

32-F8

2-FS

33

3!612001

WAH FC PCR, SCR

RNrK 724.3 t

o 241.3

L Rivx

RIVER

5100107

MORGAN

2-FS

SNS

5-P$

33

12!7/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

' River 285.0 t

o 271.6

River

RIVER

5100101

MAOOFFIN

SPS

33

33

111312005

WAH FC PCR SCR

L'

River 277.810294.1

River

RNER

5100101

MAGOFFIN

28(51

33

33

8/8/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

._

_L

Rfvsr 31.0 to

37.8

L RWer

RNER

5100101

KENTON

2-FS

5 -PS

2-FS

33

12/al2005

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

L Rlwr 4.8 to

1~.9

L Rlwr~ RNER

5100101

CAMPBELL

35-

PS3

33

2/El2001

CAH FC PCR SCR DWS

L River 529ro53.B

L River

RIVER

5100101

PENDLETON

33

33

2-FS

71/3!2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

___________

L River 174.4 to 180.8

L River

__RIVER

5100101

_ROWAN

2 -FS

2f3

S~P8

__

32-FS

11/3!2005

WNi FC PCR SCR

L River29A.7l0302.E

L River

RIVER

5700101

MAC,OFFIN

5-N8

33

33

U1I199B

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lid~f

Rlvsr78.8to88.8

L Rtvsr

RIVER

5100101

HARRISON

2-F8

2-FS

2-FS

33

12/N2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

LHtI~ Bwwr Croak 0.

0 to 3

.3L

Rtwr

RNER

5100701

HARRISON

SP8

33

33

11!3/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Litth Flal Creak O.O !0

2.3

L Rfvsr

RNER

5100101

BATH

2 -FS

33

33

8IBr2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

LNd~ Stoner Cn~k 0.0 M 5.0

L River

RNER

5700702

CLARK

35 -

NS3

33

BI1A/2000

WAH FC, PCR SCR

L Bench O.O t

o 1.5

L River

RNER

5100101

ROWAN

2-FS

33

33

812W2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lows! Gesk 0.0 to

11.8

Li

Rhret

RNER

5100101

PEENING

5 -PS

33

33

111412005

WAH FC, PCR SCR

L Run

0.0 W 2.3

L River

RIVER

5100101

PEENING

5-NS

~A-NS

33 _

3323!2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

AAnh Fork O.O l0 3.

0River

RNER

51 !01

MAC~OFFIN

5 -PS

33

33

11142005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Middy Fork

Rfvsr 0 to

2.5

L Rfwr

RNER

5700707

MAGOPFIN

2 -FS

5-NS

32 -

FS3

4!8@001

WAH FC PCR SCR

_M

ill CreNc 0.0 to

2.6

L River

RNER _

RNER

5100101

BATH

2-FS

33

3 _ _

38!812000

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

_~

p ~~ p,p ►p

p~,g

Rive

r51

0010

2HA

RRIS

ON5 -

PS3

33

311

/1@Q0

5W

AH F

C, P

CR, S

CRMi

ll Cn~

ic 0.

0 M 8.

4L

Rive

rRI

VER

5100

101

MAS

ON2 -

FS3

33

317

1120

05W

AH F

C PC

R 3C

RMk

wrC

r~ek

O.O

lo2.B

L Ri

ver

RNER

5700

107

MOR

C,AN

2-FS

33

3 ~

39/

2080

05W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RMk

wrC

n~k

2.El

07.0

L R

fwr

RIPE

R57

0010

7M

ORGA

N2-

FS3

33

371

Mf2

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

North

Fork

R

ivK

18.5

to 52

.5Ri

ver

RNER

5100

101

BRAC

KEN

5-NS

5-NS

33

33/8

1200

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RNo

rth Fo

rk

Rive

r 2.

3 to

18.5

L Ri

ver

RNER

5100

101

BRAC

I~N

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

33

71lJQ

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

North

For

k R

ivK

12.0

to 13

.1L

Rlw

rRI

VER

5100

101

MOR

GAN

5 -PS

33

33

8/22

2004

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

North

Forfc

Ri

ver 8

.4 to

12.0

L Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

0010

1M

ORGA

N2-

FS5-

NS2-

FS3

39r

2W20

05W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RNo

rth Fo

rk T

Cr

eek

1.2 t

o 14.

9L

Rive

rRN

ER51

001 D

1RO

WAN

33

33

3W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CRNa

rthFo

rkTr

i Cr

s~k

14.9

tot5

.9L

Rive

rRI

VER

51

101

ROW

AN2-

FS3

33

312

/31/

2000

WAH

FC,

PCR

SCR

O na

k O

.Ota

0.9

L Ri

ver

RNER

b100

101

MAO

OFFI

N3

33

33

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

305(b) A~seeement Results, 2008

'~ r

Oldfrold Fork 0.0 to 3.6

Pas

Brrxh O.Oto1.8

Philll

Cnsk 0.0 W 5.3

P Ir CnNc 0.0 to

2.B

Powder Lids &inch 0.0 to 3.5

P

Aah CnNc O.O l0 3.7

Punchwn C

CENk 0.0 to 1.1

Rlver

Lidci

River

Lkkf

RNer

L River

L River

L River

L Rivx

RIVER

RNER

RNER

RIVER

R1VER

RNER

RIVER

5700101

5100101

5100101

5100107

5100101

5100101

5100101

County

MORGAN

ROWAN

CAMPBELL

FLEMING

LEWIS

BATH

MAGOFFIN

5-NS

2 -FS 3 3

2 -FS

5-NS

3

3 35-NS

4A -NS

3 35 -NS

3 3 3. 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Asf~ss oau

1 1lM2005

1Nen0o1

316/2001

tftl2001

11/8!2005

8 /9/2000

N142000

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC, PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

R~wn Croak 0.0 to

5.5

L Rfvx

RNER

5700102

HARRISON

2-FS

33

33

11!812005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Rode Fork 0.0lo 4.0

Lido

River

RIVER

5100701

ROWAN

5 -PS

33

33

71/812005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Rodt Lids 0.0 to 0.8

Lkki

Rivx

RIVER

5100101

PEENING

33

33

3WpH FC PCR, SCR

Roddwuw CnNc 0.0 to 4.6

Lidci

Riva

RIVER

5700101

MORCAN

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Salt Lids Creek 3A l0 8.0

L

River

'--- RIVER ~

5100101 ~

BA -

-- SP$

33

33

8HN999

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Salt Lids Crack 8.8 to

1~.9

_ ~----

Lkklnp River

RIVER ~

51

701

BATH

2-FS

33

3

~3

8/30f2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sak

Bnneh 0.7 to 2.0

___ __

L

River

__..

RIVER

RNER --

~ RNER -- - '-

500101

• 5100101

-•

MENIFEE

PEENING '-

~ . FLEhNNG

--~

2-F8

- 2 -FS -

-- 2-F8 - -

2-FS

~~ 2-FS

3- 9 -

~ 3 3

3- 3 -

- 3 •-

4C-PS

3- •-- .3 .._ ..

..--~ - - 3 - ..- •

--- _. 3

3.- 3

-•3 -

~ 11

fB12005

--

6l23I2005 -'--

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Srid Lids CnNt 8.0 to 8.1

Lidcirq River -

- WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Sand L{dt Cn~lc OA l0 5.8

S~ndlidc Cn~k L~k~

- - ~

_ .~ --

_ Li

dc_k ~ River

Lick

Rlwr

L River

-- 5100101

-

8/1H999

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

RESERVOIR

RIVER

_5100101

5100101

PEENING

KENTON u

. 3

9128/2005

WAH PC PCR SCR

ws Fork O.O l0 3.3

___. _

33

33

1118/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

i CnNc 0.0 to 7.8

„_L

River

RIVER

5700101

NICHOLAS

6-N8

33

33

N912000

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Slwxwn CrNk O.O l0 8.7

L

Rivx

RNER

5100701

MASON

2-F$

33

33

11/8/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Shorl Creak 0.0 to

7.9

Lidci

River

RNER

510D102

PENDLETON

2-FS

33

33

11/8/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

SI

Creek 0.0 to 37

Lkkl

Rivx

RNER

5100101

ROWAN

2-FS

33

33

91ZW2005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Slits Crwk 0.0 to

13.8

__

Lidci

Rivx

RNER

5100101

BATH

2 -FS

5-PS

2-FS

2 -FS

311/912005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sl~l~ Creek 17.2 W 18.2

L

Rlwr

RNER

6100101

BATH

33

33

2-F$

11/ 12005

WAH FC, PCR SCR

SI~t~ Croak 36.1 to 37.7

_

_Rivx

RIVER

5700101

MONTGOMERY

33

33

2-FS

11N5/2005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

SINS CrNk X2.8 to 52.2

Lkkinp River

RIVER

5100101

MONTGOh~RY

32 -FS

33

32/15x1001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Slue Cn~k 52.2 to 58.8

___ __ _

L

River

RIVER

5700101

MENIFEE

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

S

Run O.Oto2.8

L

RivK

RNER

5100101

PEENING

3~MNS

33

35/2/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Som~rsM Cn~k 0,0 to 4.4

Lfdcf

Rivar

RIVER

5100702

NICHOLAS

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork

Creak

10.4 to 15.2

Lids

River

RIVER

5100101

PENDI,ETON

2-FS

2-F8

2-FS

33

11/9/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Soufh Fork L'

Rhnr 11.8 to 16.95

L

River

RIVER

5100702

PENDLETON

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

33

9/20!2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Soulh Fork Lids

RW~r 76.6 to 27.2

Lkk

Rlv~r

RIVER

5100702

HARRISON

2-FS

2-F$

33

3M7 72000

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork Lick!

RfvK 2A to 8.8

L

River

RIVER

5100102

PENDLETON

2-FS

2 -FS

33

3817112000

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork L

River 35A to X6.4

Lkk

River

RIVER

5100102

HARRISON

2-FS

2 -FS

33

38/11!2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork L

River 51.1 to 52.1

Lidci

River

RIVER

510D702

HARRISON

33

33

2-FS

11H,l2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fak Lids

River 8.8 to 11.3

Lkki

River

RIVER

5100702

PENDLETON

2-FS

33

33

8!7112000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k 0.0 to

7.7

L

River

RIVER

5100701

MONTGOMERY

5-PS

33

33

11/14/2005

WAM FC PCR, SCR

S►

N~ R

wd

Fork

0.0

to 7

.7Lie

kf R

iver

RN

ER

5100

707

MAG

OFF

IN3

33

33

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

Stor

woo

N &

rich

0.0

to 2

.5Li

cki

Riv

erR

IVER

5100

101

RO

WAN

2-FS

33

33

4!11

/200

1W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRSt

oner

CrN

k 0.

0 to

5.5

Lidc

inp

Riv

erR

NE

R51

0010

2BO

URBO

N2 -

FS5-

PS2 -

FS3

391

20f2

005

WAH

, FC

, PC

R, S

CR, D

WS

Ston

~rC

ra~k

16.

7 to

17.

3Lk

:ki

Rfv~

rR

IVER

5100

102

80U

RBO

N3

33

32-

FS11

H4/

2005

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

3ton

~r C

roNc

77.

310

30.1

Swne

r CnN

c 44

.8 to

60.

5 '

~Li

dclrq

Riv

erRI

VER

RN

ER

5100

102

5 100

102

BOUR

BON

32-

F32-

FS3 3

3 33 3

Bl1M

2000

31fi1

2001

WAH

FC

PCR

, SCR

DW

SW

AH F

C P

CR S

CRLi

dcl

Rlv

erBO

URBO

N3

SMn~

r CnN

c 5.

5101

5.0

_. __

Lick

ing

Rlv

er_

__

RI

VER

5100

102

BOUR

BON

35 -

NS

3_

33

8/1M

2000

WAH

, FC

PCR

, SCR

_St

oner

Cre

ek B

O.S I

o 72

.2S

Cre

ak O

.Ol0

3.0

_^

Lick

ing

Riv

erR

NE

R51

0010

2CL

ARK

33

3_~

3 33

__

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

Lkki

R

iver

RN

ER51

0010

1NI

CHO

LAS

bN8

33

3BJ

10I2

000

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

Slra

C

roak

O.O

101.

8Li

dci

Riv

xR

IVER

5700

101

MO

RG

AN5 -

NS

33

33

8H0/

2000

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Stro

d~s

Cre

ek 2

.7 to

19.

3 ~

Lkkk

q R

Nar

RIVE

R51

0070

2BO

URBO

Nb~

PS5 -

NS

32 -

FS3

3131

2001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Thne

rnil~

Crs

~k 0

.7 to

4.7

Lidc

l R

iver

RIVE

R51

0D10

1CA

MPB

ELL

5 -N

Sb -

NS

33

31N

1N98

9W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRTo

wn

&ar

x~ 0

.0 to

4.0

Lkki

R

iver

RIVE

R51

0010

1PE

ENIN

G3

U4N

33

33

M11

f200

1W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRTa

m B

ench

0.3

to 2

.3Li

dci

Riv

xR

IVER

5100

102

BATH

2-FS

33

33

920/

2005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Tow

ns~n

dCnN

c O

.Olo

4.8

Lkki

R

iver

RN

ER51

0010

2BO

URBO

N2 -

FS5 -

NB

33

311

H4I

2005

WAH

FC

PC

R,S

CR

Tow

nsen

d C

nslc

~.9

to 1

5.4

Lids

R

iver

RIV

ER51

0010

2BO

URBO

N2-

FS3

33

311

/7 @

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Traw

Fw

k 0.

0 to

3.1

Licks

R

iver

RN

ER51

0010

1M

AGO

FFIN

S~PS

33

33

&10/

2000

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

T C

reek

12.

3101

5.7

Lidc

i RM

~rR

NE

R51

0010

2R

OW

AN3

33

32-

FS32

5J20

02W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRT

H C

roNc

15.

710

20.5

RN

~rR

IVER

5100

701

RO

WAN

2-FS

33

33

3f7?

1200

7W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRT

Cre

ek 5

.910

12.3

Lidc

i~0

Riv

erR

NE

R51

0010

1R

OW

AN5-

PSS

NS

5 -PS

33

12!1

2005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT

to F

lit C

rsNc

0.0

to 2

.2l

Rive

sR

IVER

5100

101

BATH

2-FS

33

33

U26

/200

5W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRUT

to F

Nm

I Cr

eak

D.O

l0 2

.1L

Riv

erR

IVER

5100

101

FLEM

INf3

3M

1-NS

33

31/

1200

7W

AH F

C, P

CR, S

CRU

T to

Mill

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

4.0

UT

to S

hann

on C

reak

0.0

to 2

.2Ll

dcin

p R

iver

~ R

IVER

5100

701

PEEN

ING

5 -N

S ~

33

33

&291

2004

WAH

FC

PCR

, SCR

L R

iver

RIV

ER51

0070

1M

ASO

N2-

FS3

33

3U

29r1

004

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

305(b) Pas

it Reaulte, 2008

.yy

UT W UT to LNG Creek 0.0 to 1.6

W~Idi FoAt 0.0 to 1.0

W~riCls~k O.Ol09.8

V1flNi~mt Creek 0.0 to 5.3

~~~~~~ ~~

Wlilow Cn~k 0.0 to

10.2

_

___

Wllwn Run 0.0 W 5.1

__

_A1komCroNc 1.4103.9

_ ______ _

L

Rivsr

Riwr

Lilt

Rfwf

L Rives

L River

L'

River

LI

Rives

Lltti~

River

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

RESERVOIR

RIVER

RNER

RNER

RNER

~ RNER

5100101

5100101

5100101

5100101

5100101

5100101

5100107

5090704

MASON

MENIFEE

HARR130N

MORGAN

GRANT

PENDLETON

FLEMING

GREENUP

5 -NS

2 -FS

2-FS

32 -FS

2-FS

35-NS

3 3 3SNS

3 34A-NS

3

3 3 3 32 -FS

3 3 3

3 3 3 3 ~3 3 3 3

3 3 3 32-FS

3 3 3

11f312005

11N4f2005

9f1W2005

8l10R000

8128/2005

B HOIt000

Il112001

71/7/2003

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR 3CR

WAH, FC PCR SCR DWS

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC, PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR 3CR

WAH FC PCR SCR

AnD~ Fork 0.0 to 5.1 ___ __ _

Benit CnMc O.O to 7.2

__

Lklh

River

Liltl~ S

River

50907 W

5 0901 W

ELLIOTT

CARTER

2 -FS

5-PS

3 33 3

3 33 3

2R/2004

121f2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Crs~k

1.8 to 13.4

_LNtle S

RivK

RIVER

50901 W

ELLIOTT

2-FS

2-FS

33

31H6l2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

B S

Croak 8.1 to 15.2

Lillis

River

__

RIVER

5080104

CARTER

2-FS

2-FS

33

39/Y111003

WAH FC PCR SCR

C~n~ Crs~k 0.010 ~.

1 _

_LkW S

R{v~r

RIVER

5090704

GREENUP

5-PS

33

33

12712004

WAH, FC PCR SCR

C

Fork 0.9 to 3.5

LNd~

Rlvsr

RIVER

5070204

LAYVRENCE

2 -FS

~33

33

11H1f2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

CI

Fo~lt 0.0 !0 4.

0LiltN

RIVK

RIVER

~ 90104

ELLIOTT

2-F$

33

33

~1flf2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork 1.2 to ~.5

Little S

River

RIVER

50907 W

LAWRENCE

5-P$

33

33

122f2004

WAH FC PCR 3CR

EutForkLHWS

Rivx 24.91028.E

LIItN

Rivx

RNER

50901W

BOYD

2-F$

5-NS

33

3219ROW

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ewt Fork LHW S

Rivx 27.1 ro

30.0

UtW

River

RIVER

5090704

BOYD

5-p3

33

33

1125!2003

WAH FC PCR, 3CR

Eal Fork Lflde

River 4.7 to 9.0

LHtl~

Rivx

RNER

5090704

BOYD

2-FS

2-FS

33

31/15J2004

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

Eut Fork Lilds

River 18.9 to 24.9

LRtN S

River

RIVER

5090104

BOYD

~A NS

33

33

2r291200e

WAH, FC PCR SCR

EIH

one Bar Cr 0.0 to 1.5

_Littla S

Rivx

RNER

5090104

BOYD

5-PS

33

33

11/10/2003

WIW FC PCR SCR

Ev~rmanCr 0.0b5.7

LiIW

Rives

RNER

5090104

CARTER

SPS

33

33

1/212004

WAH FC PCR,SCR

(inner Cr 0.0 M 1.d

lktN S

River

RNER

5090104

BOYD

5-P8

33

33

1/2212004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wcs

LNW Sand Rfwr

RESERVOIR

5090104

CARTER

2-FS

32-FS

6-PS

33/5/'2003

WAH, FC PCR 3CR

Cxssn & 0.0 to 7.4

_LidN Sind Rives

_RNER

5090104

_ELLIOTT

~2-FS

~2f3

_2-FS

3 3 3

3 3 3

_,

_3

~ 3

~ ~

~_ . 3

_S ~

3~ 3 ~

3 ~

9/2212003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Gre~nbo Lake

LfttM Sand R'rv~r

RESERVOIR

50901W

GREENUP

1/1H898

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Lrwl Branch

1.0 to 2.8

____

LktN Sin

River

RIPER

SOB0104

ELLIOTT

_ _

1YHOf2003

_ _9I

Y212003

WAH, FC PCR SCR

LwM Crs~k 0.0 to

7.8

LNda

Wwr

RNER

5090104

ELLIOIT

2-FS

~ 33

3WAH, FC, PCR SCR

~Lwn1 Cn~k 7.6 to 11.2

Little

River

RIVER

5090104

_ELLIOTT

2-FS

33

__ _

33

__9/?.2R003

WAH FC PCR SCR

LMt Fork R~dwfn~ Cnslc OA to 1.2

Uttl~

River

RIVER

5090704

ELLIOTT

5-PS

33

33

11!!@003

WAH FC PCR SCR

L icfc F

ork 0,0 to 5.2

LHII~

River

RIVER

50901W

ELLIOTT

6-PS

33

33

12HQ2003

CAH FC PCR 8CR

Littt~ForkLklle

River 12.01023.E

LiIW

River

RIVER

5090704

CARTER

SpS

33

33

11N1/1002

WAH FC PCR SCR

LkW Fork Lktls

River 2.3 m 4.8

LNtl~ 3

RtvK

RNER

50D0104

CARTER

2-F$

2-F$

33

31N~720W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lfttl~ FoAc LRW S

Rlwr 23.8 to 27.7

LkW

River

RIVER

5090104

ELLIOTT

5-NS

33

33

1/22/200M1

WAH FC PCR SCR

LkW Fork LittN S

River 27.710 30.5

Little

River

RNER

5090104

ELIIOTT

SP9

33

33

11/71x1003

WAH FC PCR SCR

LNtN Fork Lfltls 3

River 4.810 BA

LfttN

River

RNER

5090104

CARTER

5-PS

33

33

7!82002

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Lkds Fork LittN

River 8.0 b 120

Lktl~ S

River

RNER

5080704

CARTER

2-FS

33

33

11125x2003

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

__Lk

tN

River 0.0 W 0.2

LNtN S

River

RNEft

50801 W

GREENUP

35-NS

33

32I~120W

WAH FC, PCR SCR

LkW

River 0.2 W 12.7

Likb

Rivx

RIVER

_5090704

5090104

OFiEENUP

33

3____ 3

_2-FS

2fY/2004

WAH, FC PCR SCR

___ _ _

Litth

River 12.1 to 20.1

Littb

River

_RIVER

RNER

-" . _.. RNER

_____ RNER__ _

.__

_ . _ RIVER

_ _

RNER

OREENUP

2-FS

2_FS

32_FS

311250003

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Little

Rive

r 40.1 b12.5

LHW

RfvK 42.5 b 47.1 --

-- .~._ _

LNW Sr~dy River

5080104

5090104

CARTER

-..CARTER

3~ 2-FS

32-FS

3 3 3

3---- 3 .-___ _

3_ 3

2 -FS

7!22004 _

WAH FC PCR SCR

. ~

Rfwr

SPS_

31/14!2004

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Lillis

River 71.8b74.7

Littl~S

Rivx

5090104.

_ ELLIOTT

_.

2-FS

~_3

1/1~20w

WAH FC,PCR SCR

Lktl~

River 20.1 to 37.7

LktN

River

(iREENUP

33

33

17@512003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Litd~

CrsNc 0,0 to 8.2

Lower Stfnwn CnNc 0.0 to

1.1--

-- •-~--- ~~-- ----

Little Sandy R'rvar

_.5090104

50901 W

. _.5090104

`.

CARTER

2-FS

- 3

_3

_.,

-• 3 ---

3~ ~

1f22f2004

WAH FC PCR, SCR

LNW

River-

--- - RNER ~~

CARTER

5-PS

33

33

2/11/2004

WAH FC PCR. SCR

MNdow Branch 0.0 to 1.4

LittN

River

RNER

5090101

ELLIOTT

2-FS

33

33

9122/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

MIddN Fork LMtl~

Wwr 0.0 to

5.7

Lktk

River

RNER

5090104

ELLI0IT

2 -FS

33

33

9f22R003

WAH FC PCR S R

MIddN For1c Lido S

River 5.7 to 7.5

Lfttl~

River

RNER

5090104

EWOTT

5-PS

33

33

1/22I20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Newaanb~ CnNc 0.0 to 11.9

LNde

River

RNER

SOB0104

ELLIOTT

M-P8

33

33

1r22r1004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Nkhol~ Fork O

.O 101.8

Lkti~ S

Rfwr

RNER

SOOD7 W

EWOTT

2-FS

33

33

922/2003

WAFI~ FC, PCR, SCR

OldtawnCrsNc O.Oto1.9

LItWS

RfvK

RIVER

5090104

GREENUP

S~PS

5-PS

38

,__. 3

_3

11N02003

WAH FC PCR SCR

R

Fork Newoornb~ Croak OA to 4.2

UtW

River

RIVER

5090101

ELLIOTT

_3

33

372/10/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

&aneh 0.0 to

3.2

LNN~ S

Rlwr~

RNER

~`80104

ELLIOTT

SP8

3 33

3

_~

312/1012003

WAH FC PCR 3CR

S. Fork Ruin Cn~k 0.0 to OJ

Little

Rhnr

RNER

RNER

b080701

~ELLIOTT

33

33

WAH FC PCR SCR

3

Cr~sit 0.0 b 3.B

LNW Sand River

~~

5090104

~

CARTER~

-S-PS

S~NS

3 33 3

3~

3 ~

~3

1/22/20W

_ __

__ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Turrisl &anch O

.O 101.7

LktN Sa

Rlwr

RNER

3~

11HOf2003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

UT to Eut Fork LNtl~

Rivet OA (0 0.3

Liltl~

River

RNER

5090104

GREENUP

b -NS

33

33

11/82003

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

UT to New~omb~ C~k 0.0 to 0.95

Lifti~

Rhtir

RNER

5000104

ELLIOIT

2-FS

2 -FS

33

33

12I1o12ao3

WIW, FC, PCR, SCR

uT a Nawcon~ cnNc o.o to 1.33

LIIW

Rfv~r

RNER

~5090104

ELLIOTT

33

33

12I101Z003

WAH FC PCR SCR

WNIs

0.0 to 3.5

LiHk

Rlwr

RNER

5080104

ELLIOTT

SPS

33

33

1f?NlOM

WAH FC PCR SCR

a r ~O

305(b) Mucsment Res

ufls

, 2008

a N O

Williams Creek 0.0 W 2.9

LKth Sind River

RNER

SOBQ104

BOYD

5 -PS

33

33

1I21I2004

WAH FC, PCR SCR

C

Cn~k 0.0 b 3.8

CI

idc Crs~k 14.81015.7

_ __ _

CI

Cn~k 4.B M 10.7

Lower Cwr~rl~d

Lwwr Cumb~rl~nd

Laver CumbKland

RNER

RIVER

RNER

5130205

5130205

5730205

TRIGG

CRITTENDEN

CRITTENDEN

5 -PS

2-FS

5 -NS

2-FS

3SNS

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

3/25J2002

5/2/2W2

3 !22/2008 - 3l22f2007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Cn~k1.9ro~.B

Low~rCumb~rfend

RIVER

5130205

CRITTENDEN

2-FS

5-NS

33

31N0/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Croak 10.7 to

13.9

Lorwr Cuir~MAand

RIVER

5130205

CRITTENDEN

5-PS

33

33

3f22/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Cnb CfeNt 0.

0 to ~.B

Lowrr Cumb~rl~nd

RNER

513020.5

LYON

5 -PS

33

~ 3

32!28/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Crooked CnNt 2.

9 to

9.1

Lw~r Cunb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130205

TRIGG

2-FS

33

33

2/2712007

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Cumberland RNrsr 0.0 to 30.8

Laver Cixnbetland

RNER

5130205

LNINGSTON

2-FS

33

2-FS

2 -FS

22712007

WAH fC PCR SCR DWS

C u CnNt 0.

1 W 8.1

Laver CunbKland

RNER

5130205

LMNGSTON

5-NS

33

33

322/2007

WAH FC PC SCR

Don~idwn CnNt I.0 to 7.2

Lawn C~xnbel~nd

RNER

5730205

TRIGG

2 -FS

33

33

tOH012008

WAH FC PCR SCR

DonNdwn Cn~k 7.2 to

9.3

Law~r Cwr~b~rl~nd

RNER

5730205

TRIOG

SPS

33

33

5/18002

CAH FC PC SCR

Cn~k O.Ol03.B

LwwrCumberland

RIVER

5130205

CALDWELL

5-PS

5 -NS

33

3~11H~B-3/70@008

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Fork 0.0 b 7.3

LowK Cumbal~nd

RNER

5130208

LOGAN

5-P3

33

33

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork Cr~Nt 5,B to

6.8

Lower Cumb~AeW

RNER

5130208

CHRISTIAN

5 -NS

33

33

5f1l2002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Fork CnNt 0.

010 8.4

Lowy Curt~tl~nd

RNER

5130205

LYON

2 -FS

33

33

WAH FC PCR 3CR

E

CnNt B.4lo 10.5

Lower Cumberland

RNER

5130205

LYON

35-NS

33

3Sl

2@00

2WAH FC PCR SCR

E

Ct~Nt70.11012.9

Low~rCurt~rland

RNER

5130205

CAIDWELL

2 -FS

5 -NS

SNS

2-FS

2-FS

-. 3--.

SPS

3 ~

33

33

7N3R000

WAH FC PCR SCR

E

Cn~k 13.0 to 15.7

____ __

Lower C~xnb~rl~nd

RNER

.__

RNER

5130205

5-NS

33_3

~ ~

3

~~

3~~

- - 3-

----

~ _3 3

33HQl2008

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

ENt Fork 22.3 b 31.1

lower Cumb~rl~nd

5130208

_ CALDWELL

TODD

5 -PS

3 3'

.Ng

3 3

3 32-F8'

--3 3 ~3

3 3 3-3 -

3

?/2E/2007

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

EXcFak 7.5 to 22.3

_____

LowKCumb~rland

_ RNER ____

_ 5130208

_ 5130205_

- 5130205 _

5130205

5130206

TODD _

7/5/2001

~ 3!38008

WAH FC PCR SCR

E

I.~k~

______ ___

,.. ___,

LwwrCumb~rleW

_ _RESERVOIR .

__-. RIVER- --

RNER

RNER

TRIGG

~ WAM,FC PCR SCR

F

Cn~k 0.0 to

1.2 .---.-- •---•-------

F Cn~k 1.2 to 2.3

LowaCumb~rland

- ---

Lower Cumb~rl~nd

_

._LNINGSTON -

- -~

5/2@002--

--

WAH FC PCR SCR

LIVINGSTON

TRIGG

SIZ2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fmklin CrNk 0.0 to

2.4

Lower Cumberland

3WAH FC PCR SCR

FWWn Cn~k 2.7 b 5.9

Lowrr Cumberland

RNER _

5130205

LYON

2-FS

33

33

5212002

WAH FC PCR, 3CR

HwnrnorW CrMlt 2.O l0 2.2

Lower Cwr~rland

RNER

5130205

LYON

SB-PS

58 -PS

33

3517J2002

WAIT FC PCR SCR

H~rt~atM~ LNu

Lwwr Cumberland

RESERVOIR

5130205

TRIGG

SNS

35-PS

33

3/3x2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

CtNk O

.O l0 3.9

Laver CumbM~nd

RNER

5130205

LMNGSTON

2-FS

5 -NS

33

351212002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Flq~lur L~k~

Laver CutnMrland

RESERVOIR

5130205

LYON

2-FS

3~C-PS

33

3!3/2008

WAH, fC PCR SCR

Cn~k 0.0 to

~.0

Lwwr C~xnb~rl~nd

_RIVER

5130205

TRIGG

5-PS

33

33

51L2002

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Uks

Lower Cumb~rlutd

RESERVOIR

5130205

LYON

2-FS

32-FS

2-FS

2-FS

3f9@U08

WAH FC PCR SCR

L~k~ B

_Lrnwr Cumb~rl~nd

RESERVOIR

5130205

CHRISTL4N

2 -FS

32 -FS

33

3f3@008

WAH, FC PCR 3CR

L~keMarti~

Low~rCurtib~rl~nd

RESERVOIR

5130205

CHRISTIAN

2-fS

32-FS

33

1H2O00

WAH PC PCR SCR

L~un Fum~a Cn~k 0.0 !0 2.9

LowK Cunb~rlrtd

RNER

5130205

TRIGG

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

LMtl~ River 14.7 W 20.8

Lwwr CunbelrW

RIVER

5130205

TRI(3G

TRIGG

_. TRIGG ~

SPS

33

33

72/~f2008

WAH FC PC SCR

Lfl tN River 20.8 to 30.0

Lower Cuir~rir~d

RIVER

5130205

SPS

SNS

~2-FS

35-PS

3713!2002 -1 W1012008

WAH FC PCR SCR

LNtN River 30.0 to

31.4

Lower Cumb~rlarW

RNER

5130205

5 -PS

33

35/2@002

WAH FC PCR, SCR

_. __.

LNW Wwr 31.E to 45.5

Lw~wr CuM~rland

RIVER

5130205

_TRIGG

5 -PS

5 -PS

33

3_

5/5/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

LKd~Rivsr45.51057.7

LowerCumb~rtand

RNER

5130205

CHRISTIAN

SNS

5 -NS

33

35I2J2002

WAH FC PC SCR

LNW

II Creak 0.0 to

4.2

Laver CumbMuM

RIVER

5130208

LOGAN

2-FS

33

33

8/24/2000

WAFT FC PCR SCR

Cn~k 4.6 to 7.0

Lower Cumb~rl~nd

RNER

5130205

LYON

5-PS

5-PS

5-PS

33

3H2O07

WAH, FC PCR 3CR

Crwk 11.8 to 15.5

Lower Cua~tl~nd

RNER

5130205

LYON

5-NS

33

33

322/2006

WAH FC PCR SCR

CrNk 0.4 to

3.5

Lrnwr Cumb~rl~nd

RNER

5130205

TRIGO

2-FS

33

33

5/2/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pond &ex~h 2.7 ~ 3.2

Lw~r Cumberland

RIVER

5130205

TRIGG

5-NS

33

33

5/2/Z002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lower &aneh 3.4 to

9.3

Lwwr Cumberland

RNER

5130205

CHRISTIAN

5-PS

33

33

5/x/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

AMddl~ &arxh of North Fork M LNW River 1.3 to

3.9

Laver CuiM~MrM

RIVER

5130205

CHRISTUW _

SPS

33

33!2212008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork 1,.5 W 28.8

Lower Curnb~rland

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

5130205

TRIGG

5-NS

33

_ _3 _

3~

3 ~

~3

__511f2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Font 3.0 W 6.1

Lower Curr~rl~rW

5730205

TRIGG

2•FS

~2-FS

33

3N2/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

NoAh Fork LigN River 10.9 to 18.1

Lower CumbalvM

5730205

CHRISTIAN

5-NS

5-NS

SNS

5-PS

5-NS

3 3 3 3

3 _ _

._

3 __ _

3 35l2f2002

WI1H FC PC SCR

Noah Fork of LMW River O

.O l0 0

.3Lower CumbKl~nd

_RIVER

5130205

CHRI3TIAN

__

,__

5/2f2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

North Fork d LHtM River 7.0 to 10.9

LowK Curib~rland

__

_ _

RNER

5130205

CHRISTUIN

SNS

3M1H96B

WAH FC PCR 8CR

NoM Fork W Lich River 0.310 7.0

Lower Cumb~rlrW

RNER

5130205

CHRISTIAN

&PS

SPS

~5-NS

___3 _

33

5/2/2002

WAH fC PCR SCR

PINs~nl C3rov~ Cn~k O

.O l0 2.2

Lower CurM~rland

RNER

RNER

5130208

L0C3AN

5 -PS

33

358/2002

WAN FC PCR SCR DWS

RW Rivsr 50.8 to 54.5

Laver

uW

5730208

LOG/W

2 5

5-NS

33

33H3l2007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Rid Rfwr 54.5 ro

58.9

Laver Curnb~rland

RNER

5130208

LOGAN

5-PS

33

33

1011Q2006

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

R~dRlwr 57.O1o85.B

Lwv~rCWnb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130206

LOGAN

2-FS

5.NS

32-FS

31/3@002-3/132007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Rif

f River 85.8 M 74.3

Lower Cumbal~nd

RNER

5130206

LOGAN

33

33

3WAH, FC PCR SCR

Rid River 7,.310 81.3

Lower Cumberland

RNER

5130208

SIMPSON

5-PS

33

33

6232000

WAH FC PCR SCR

RkhlrW Creak 0.710 5.4

Lowrr Cumberland

RNER

5130205

LNINOSTON

3S~NS

33

35/2/2002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

3

Cr~Nc 0.0 ro

2.3

LowK CumD~rlend

RNER

5730205

LIVINGSTON

35 -NS

33

352/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

305(b) Aa

er

t Reeulte, 2D08

~h ContumoNon

SiMchols Near

Fork

_

_Lower C~xnberland

SPRING

5130205

TRIGG

SB-NS

5 -PS

2 -FS

5 -NS

5 -NS

5-PS

5-NS

5 -NS

5 -PS

32 -

FS 3 3 35 -NS 3

5 -NS

5 -NS

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3311412007

~CAH FC PCR SCR

S

Fork 2.2 to 5.8

_

_S

Fork 24.1 to 30.9

___

S

Fork 13.8 to 18.8

S

Fork 37.0 to 32.7

Skkdnms Cn~k 0.0 l0 4.8

SkkxNr Crwk 0.0 M 5.0

_South Fork d LHds Riwr 0.0 l010.3

_

_Saulh FoAc of LNtl~ River 10.3 to 20.3

_

Lower Cunbwlr~d

L ower

L ower Cu1~rl~nd

Lower Ctrnb~rland

Lower Cunb~A~nd

Lower Curflberl~nd

L aw~r Cumb~rl~nd

Lwvx Curtiberl~rW

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

5130205

5130205

5130205

5130205

5730205

5130205

5130205

5130205

TRIG

TRIGG

CHRISTIAN

CHRISTVW

L YON

TRKiO

CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

~ 3H 91

2007

5 !2/2002

5 !2/2002

3/22J2008

5 1212002

SfJJ2002

5!1/2002

5!2!2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR 3CR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

W/W FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

SaAh Fork d Li

ltle River 21.31028.7

Lower Cumbal~nd

RNER

5130205

CHRISTIAN

5-NS

33

33

5/2/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sa~lft F

ork d Rid River O.O l0 5

.3Lower Curtibarl~nd

RNER

RIVER

~

5130206

LOGAN

2-FS

2-FS

33

310/10/1008

WAH FC PCR SCR

South Fork Rid RfvK 5.3 to 7_9

Lower Curr~l~nd

~ 5130208

LOC3/W

33

3~ 3

~ 3

~2-

FS5/2/2002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Cn~k 3.Ob3.5

Low~rCurtibM~nd

RNER

RIVER ~

..5130205

LYON

SN$~

33

3 3 3

b122D02

3 H5I2007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

WAH FC PCR SCR

S

CreNc 1~.1 to

16.3

_Lwwr Cumberland

5130208

TODD

2-FS

SNS

~ 2-

FS_ 2-FS

S -PS

3 33

~~ 3

~3

~~

3 3

~ ~

3

v Cask 1.0 ►0

7.4

Law

n C~

xnbw

lr~d

RIVE

R_

RIVE

R .^

R IVE

R ~

5130

205

CHRI

STUW

3 3 3 3 ~

5/2/

2002

WAH

, FC,

PCR

SCR

Cree

k 2.

2 to

6.9

_ _

._ _

__

__

Lowe

r Cur

tibK

lrW51

3020

5LN

ING

STO

N5-

PS~ 3 3

~ 3

5/L2

002

-1W

7020

06W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RS

Croa

k O

1o8.

8 ~

_~Lo

w~rC

~xnb

al~n

d57

3020

8_ .

SIM

PSO

N3

'612

3200

0W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R&

aneh

0.0

ro 2

.8

__

Lowe

r C~r

nbM

~nd

RIVE

R51

3020

5CH

RIST

IAN

35l2

~200

2W

AH, F

C, P

CR S

CRUT

to

Cnel

c 0.0

to 2

.1Lo

wer C

urtib

erl~

ndRI

VER

5130

205

TRIf3

G5 -

NS3

33

310

/3/2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT to

Ful

ton

CroN

c 0.0

to 0

.8Lw

v~r C

urnb

~rla

ndRI

VER

5130

205

LYO

N2-

FS3

33

3tO

HO@

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT

to L

Ktls

II C

n~k 0

.1 l0

0.6

Lowe

r Cun

bsrla

ndRI

VER

5130

208

LOCi

AN5-

NS3

33

33f

ZY20

08W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRWitt F

ork

Cn~

k no

t nrn

ed on

rrN

0.

8 to

2.0

Low

rr C

un~r

l~nd

RIVE

R51

3020

8TO

DDSB

-PS

33

33

5I2f

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

W~a

t Fak

Rid

Rive

r 14

.2 to

28.

4 _.

Lowe

r Cwn

berla

ndRI

VER

5130

208

CHRI

STIA

N5 -

PS2 -

FS3

33

3N91

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

II C

ask

0.0

to 1

3.2

Law~

r Cur

nbar

f~nd

__RN

ER

5130

206

LOG

AN2-

FS2 -

FS3

33

1W10

r200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RM

owh~

~dLN

uM

I R

ivx

LAKE

8010

100

BALL

ARD

33

33

3W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R__

__

.__

__

__

B de

Chh

n O

.Ol0

4.2

Miu

i Ri

ver

__R I

VER

BD10

207

FULT

ON

33

32-

F33

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

__

__

__

_Ba

ou

de C

hNn

14.3

to 2

8.2

Miu

hs

Riv

erR

NER

9010

207

HICK

MAN

2-F8

41M

N33

2-FS

331

2112

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Ba

ds C

hin

B.B

to 14

.3M

ini

Rive

rRI

VER

8010

201

FULT

ON

S~NS

5 -NS

33

32/

2712

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Brus

h C

n~k

0.0

to 6.

3M

isty

Riv

KRI

VER

RIVE

RLA

IC

8010

207

HICI

Q~M

N5 -

PS3

3~~

33

7rl/2

000

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

&w

h C

nsk

0,0

to 8

.4M

i~si

' Rfw

r80

1020

1G

RAVE

S~

~ 5-P

8~

33 3

3 33

~3

7152

001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

g~ p

~M

iu

Rive

r80

1010

0BA

LIAR

D~~

3

3W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R DW

SCN

dw~l

l Cre

ak O

.O l0

3.0

Mfu

l Ri

ver

RN

ER ~

RNER

8010

202

GRA

VES

S -NS

3 38

3 ~

381

2820

00_

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Cans

Cro

ak O

.O l0

5.3

Mls

Nuf

Ri

ver

8010

201

HICK

MAN

v

5-P8

33

~3

_7/

1220

00W

AH, F

C PC

R, S

CRCa

ns C

rssk

0.3

to 4

.1M

fulu

i Ri

ver

RN

ER80

1010

0BA

LLAR

D6-

PS3

33

37/

6/20

00W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

R DW

SCr

yCn

elt

3.31

04.1

Mis

alu

R~V

NRI

VER

8010

201

GRA

VES

5B-P

SSB

~PB

33

35/

4/20

02W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R DW

SCa

ns C

rask

0.0

to 4

.4M

iadt

si

Riv

xRI

VER

8070

201

HICK

~AAN

5 -NS

33

33

2/23

/200

7W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RC~

nlnl

Cre

ek 0

.8 to

2.5

Mlu

lu'

Rive

rRI

VER

8010

201

CARL

ISLE

34M

NS

33

33!

2512

002

WAN

FC

PCR

SCR

Crs~

k 0.

8510

2.3

hNul

Ri

ver

RIVE

R80

1020

7G

RAVE

S3

4A N

S3

33

SYL2

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

p~ ~

Miu

lu

RW

xLA

KE80

1010

0BA

LLAR

D3

33

33

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

OIIb

Mt C

rack

1.7

to 3

.5M

luiu

' R

iwa

RN

ER80

7020

1G

RAVE

S&

NS

33

3S

5Rf2

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

C3ow

e Cr

eek

0.0

to 4

.4M

itslu

Ri

ver

RN

ER80

7020

1G

RAVE

SS~

PS3

33

3Bf

29r2

000

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Hurl

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

3.7

Miu

is

Riv

KRI

VER

8010

100

BALL

ARD

5 -NS

33

33

7/61

2000

CAH

FC, P

CR S

CRHi

xrie

ans

Cree

k 0.

0 to

3.7

Mlu

lu

Rfv

xRI

VER

8010

207

CAR

USI

ES -

PS3

33

33l

21r2

008

-W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RJa

doon

C~e

k 0.

0 b 3.

0M

i~N

si

Rive

rR

NER

X10

201

GRA

VES

2 -FS

33

33

10/1

0200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RCr

oak

0.0

to 1.

8M

isus

e Ri

ver

RN

ER80

1020

1G

RAVE

SS

NS

33

33

4/26

1200

7W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

RKr

wb

Cree

k 1.

3 to

3.0

Mi

Rfvs

rR

NER

8010

202

GRA

VES

SN

S3

~3

33

512f

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lids C

rwk

0.0

to 2.

2M

iulu

R

ivx

RN

ER80

1020

1CA

RLIS

LES

PS

33

y3

32/

28!2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LittM

B~

ds C

hain

10.

0 to

12.

3M

iwiu

i Ri

ver

RIVE

R60

1020

1FU

LTO

NHI

CIQd

l4N5d

VS3

33

35@

/'200

2W

AH F

C PC

R CR

LNtl~

8~

d~ C

hin

0.0

to 1.

3M

iub

Rive

sRI

VER

8070

201

SP

S~

33

33

5!!!1

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LitW

Crs

Nt

0.0 M

5.3

Miu

i~i

Riv

xR

NER

8010

207

HIC

IaM

NS

NS

33

3 ~

37/

7f2D

00W

AH f

C P

CR S

CRLit

1N C

C

n~k 0

.0 to

2.0

Mbs

iu

Rive

sR

R

9010

201

GRA

VES

5-N

83

33

361

28!2

000

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LNd~

C

u C

rs~k

O.O

l0 3.

6M

iufu

R

iver

RN

ER80

7020

1H

ICIa

MN

SP

S3

33

332

2800

6W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRLM

W C

~s

Crs

~k 5

.8 to

9.2

Miu

iu

Rive

rRI

VER

8010

201

HICI

OiAA

N2-

FS3

33

317

/7/2

007

_ W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRU

ttN

Id C

r~Nc

0.0

to 1

0.6

Mlu

l Ri

ver

RN

ER80

1020

1G

RAVE

SS~

PS3

33

31 W

70@

008

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

_LM

tls M

ud C

nslt

0.0

to 1

.95

~L

GaN

c 0.

0 W

0.8

~Cr

eek

2.2 r

o 5.

5

Miu

luf

'Riv

erM

iuls

si

Rhro

rM

iufs

'R

iver

RIVE

RRN

ER

RIVE

R

8010

201

8070

201

8010

201

FULT

ON

CARL

ISLE

CARL

ISLE

SP

S5B

-PS

5 -P8

3S B

-0S

3

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

7H2I

2000

5/7/

2002

7110

2000

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

WAH

fC

, PCR

SCR

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

CreN

c 20

.E to

38.

1Cn

elc

36.1

to 3D

.2

--- --

-+M

iati~

~i

f Rive

r-~

~ R

IVER

~-

- - -

RIVE

R - .

RNER

8010

201

McC

RACK

ENb -

PS3

33

361

2980

00

_W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

RM

fatk

~i

Riv

er-8

0102

01G

RAVE

Sb -

PS3

33

3sr

2rz0

02W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRd

Crw

k 59

.8 to

82.

3M

iaN

uipp

l Rive

r80

1020

1G

ALLO

WAY

5-NS

33

33

Sr2r

1002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

CrsN

c 71

.1 to

18.

5M

iul~

'

Rive

rRI

VER

8010

201

CARL

ISLE

5-NS

5-NS

5 -NS

33

1011

0@00

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

R

a i N r-•

305(b) Assessment Reeulta, 2008

9 N N

i

.6010201

~AAA HW Creek 38.2 to X0.8

M~

Id Crs~k A0.8 W 43.7

_ _

Miasluf

RivK888.910953.5__

Mud Cn~k 0.0 to 7.8

___ ___

OWon Cnsk A0.8 to M.2

Miuiul 'River

Mietiai

River

Miuiui

Rfwr

Mfufui

Rlver

Miufu

River

RIVER

RNER

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

8010207

8010100

8010201

8010201

GRAVES

GRAVES

FULTON

FULTON

HICFQ~AAN

5-NS

5-NS

35-NS

SNS

&NS3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 32-FS

3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3!Z/2007

7/252008

3I2f2007

4N/1898

7/4/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAFI, FC, PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

ObianCn~k 14.21049.8

_ _

Miulss

River

RNER

8070207

HICI4WAN

5-PS

33

33

x!1/1002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Obion GsNc 0.

0. l0 78.5

__

NNssiui

R{vsr

RIVER

8070201

FULTON

5-NS

5-NS

33

33N212007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Oblon Crack 28.7 to 37.7

_..

_Miuiu

RivK_

RIVER

x010201

HICKMAN

2 -FS

33

33

1W10/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Obbn Cn~k 49.8 M 55.7

Mirsisi

'River

_ RNER

8010201

GRAVES

5-PS

33

33

1!312002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cnsk O.Oto2.3

Ml~si

RNr~r

RIVER

0070201

GRAVES

5-NS

33

33

8/28/2000

WAH FC PCR 3CR

RNlct NNunl ClwmN

Crwk 77.4 b 20.4

Miuiul Wwr

RIVER

8010201

CARLISLE

5-NS~3

33

31 W3/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

R

3

0.0 to 16.2

_Miuisti

River

RIVER

8010202

FULTON

5-PS

33

33

7/5J2001

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Sind Cn~k O.O l0 3.7

Mlulul

River

RNER

8010201

GRAVES

2•FS

33

33

12/1?12001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sh~vrr»~ Cfs~k 0.0 to 3.2

Mlsai~i

'River

RNER

8070100

BALLARD

5B-NS

SB-PS

33

35f2f2002 -1/1/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sh~wnss Creek 3.21012.4

Miuisti

River

RIVER

BO1D100

BALLARD

5-PS

33

2-FS

371512001 -1f28f2008

WAH FC PCR CR

Sh~wne~ Creek S

0.0 to 3.7

Mlului

I River

RNER

8010100

BALLARD

5-NS

2-FS

33

33/142007

-WAH FC PCR 3CR

South FoAc

tN ChNn 2.0 to 7.4

Missiul

f River

RNER

8070201

GRAVES

5-NS

33

33

71512001

WAH FC PC SCR

SaM Fork d B

de CM~n 0.0 M 2.0

Mis~iai

I River

RIVER

8010201

GRAVES

5-PS

33

33

3/22/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Stov~tl Croak 0.0 to 3.8

MluisW

River

RIVER

8010201

BALLARD

2-FS

33

33

7/8/2000

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Crs~k 0.0 to 1.3

Miti

River

RNER

8010201

BALLARD

5-PS

33

33

8R9f2000

WAH PC PCR, SCR

Swri Pond

_Misdu

Rfwr

_ LAKE

8010100

BALLARD

2-FS

32 -FS

33

31812008

WAH FC PCR, SCR

T

CnNc 2.7 to 6.0 ___„____

Mitsiui

River

RIVER

8010202

GRAVES

2-FS

5-NS

33

33/20/2007 - 3f23/2007

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

TorunCn~k O.Ol00.8

______

_Miasiu

Rhrer

RIVER

_RIVER

8070201

GRAVES

SB-PS

5B-pS

3_

33

811!2002

WAH FC PCR,SCR

Tnxn~n Croak 2.O to 3,2

_ ___

Mfalui

i River

8010201

CARLISLE

58-PS

b8-p3

33

3512/2002

WAM, FC, PCR, SCR

Trumu~ Crnk 3.210 4.7

__

___

Miufu

River

_ RNER

_.8010201

CARLISLE

5-P8

33

_

3 ___

33

32?l2006

WAH FC PCR, SCR

UT to Brwh Cn~k OA to 1.9

___.

Miulu

Rfwr

RNER

8070201

HICIO~MN

5-N$

33

3__

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

UT to

Cn~k 0.0 to 1.0

M(alt

River

__ RNER _

8010201

McCRACKEN

5-NS

33

33

SYL2002

WAH, FQ, PCR, SCR

____

UT to

Crs~k

1.1 to 3.5

Miuiw

River

RNER

8010207

GRAVES

~ 5-N3

33

33

5/1/2W2

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Mud Crs~k 0.0 to 2.2

Miuiu

Rlwr

RIVER

8010207

FULTON

5-NS

3~ 3

33

3/x/2006

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Obion Creek 7

.6 to 2.2

Migiul

Rivx

RIVER

9010201

HICI0Y4W

5-NS

33

33

5f2/2W2

WAM FC PCR SCR

Witt Fork

Crank 5.3 to 15.5

Mlui~~

River

RIVER

8010201

CARLISLE

2-FS

33

33

3!272006

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Wilson CnNc 0.0 to 2.7

Mlulul

River

RIVER

8010201

CARLISLE

5-NS

5-NS

33

33/23!2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Wilson CrNk 2

.1 to 8.0

Miulsal

Riva

RIVER

8010201

CARLISLE

2-FS

33

33

7!712000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ahx~ndri~ Prk Lake

OMo River

RESERVOIR

5090201

CAMPBELL

33

35-P3

3113112008

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

AINn Fork 2010 ~.8

Ohb River

RIVER

50902D3

BOONE

SPS

33

33

M11/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

B

Croak 0.5 to 11.9

Ohb River

RNER

51 0208

McCRACKEN

5-PS

33

2-FS

32!2212007

WAH FC PCR SCR

B

Croak 0.0 to 19.7

Ohb Rivx

RNER

5140203

LNINGSTON

5-NS

33

33

3Hl2003

WAH fC PCR SCR

Bur Run 1

.8 to 1,9

Ohio River

RIVER

5140201

BRECKINRIDGE

5-NS

33

33

3N/2003

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

Bs~wrdam LNce

Ohb River

LAKE

~5110208

BALLARD

33

33

3WAH FC, PCR SCR

Beech Fork 0.05 to 3.3

Ohb Rivx

~ ~

RIVER

5140201

BRECKINRIDGE

2-FS

33

33

1011/2007

WAH, FC PCR SCR DWS

811 Dftch 0.0 to 2.8

Ohb Rivx

RIVER

RIVER

5110207

DAVIESS

5-NS

2-FS

33

~

33 3

123/2008

3!3/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

BI Borg Creek 1

.2 to 70.7

~Ohb RWx

509D203

BOONE

33~ ~ 3

BI SaAh Fak O

.B l0 3.0

Ohb R{v~r

RNER

~5090203

BOONE

2-FS

33

33

8/12000

WAH FC PCR, SCR

BI S

r Croak 0.7 to 2.0

Ohb Rfwr

RNER

5080203

GALLATIN

5~P3

~3

33

33!312005

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Bl~ddord Cn~k 0.2 to ~.0

Ohb River

RNER

5140201

HANCOCK

2-FS

5-NS

33

31/22l200e

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bl~dcford Croak 4.0 M 8.4

Ohio RWx

RNER

5140201

HANCOCK

S~PS

33

33

2/28!2003

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Bladdord Cn~k 8.4 to 10.4

Ohb River

RNER

5140201

HANCOCK

2-FS

33

33

1IZ312008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bracken Creak 2.B to 11.0

Ohio Rivx

RIVER

5080201

BRACKEN

5-P8

33

33

tOr2512005

WAtI FC PCR SCR

Bench 0.210 2.2

Ohb River

RIVER

5090201

LEWIS

5~P8

33

33

10f2~f2005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Bnnh Cnelc 0.0 to

1.6

Ohb River

RIVER

5080201

CAMPBELL

2-FS

SNS

33

3215@007

WAH FC PCR SCR pWS

Buds Crs~k 0.0 to 7.8

Ohb River

RIVER

5140203

LNINGSTON

2-FS

33

33

3N/2D03

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

g~q~ ~~

Ohb Rlwr

LAKE

5140206

BAI.LARD

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Bulch~n Br~di 0.0 to 0.3

Otdo Rhror

RIVER

510201

W1N CK

2-FS

2-FS2-FS

33

813!2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Butchat &anti 0.3 to 2.~

Ohb River

RIVER

5110201

HAN CK

~A~N8

MMNSMMNS

3 _

32HIl2006

WAH FC PCR 3CR DWS

Cabin Cn~k 3.8 to 11.3

Ohb River

RIVER

5090201

MASON

5~N8

33

33

2/b/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Croak 0.0 to ~.3

Ohb Rlv~r

RNER

51402D3

CRITTENDEN

2-F8

33

3

~3

3112003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Carw~ Crask 2.~ to 5.0

Ohio River

R(VER

5140202

HENDERSON

SNS

5-NS

SN8

3 u

312312008

WAH f PCR SCR DWS

C

~r LNa

Ohb Rlwr

RESERVOIR

5140201

DAVIESS

5~PS

32-FS

33

11HU2008

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

C

Creak 0.8 W 9.7

Ohb RivK

RNER

61,0202

UNION

FrNS

33

33

3/1!2003

WAH FC PCR, SCR DWS

Clanton Crs~k o.0 to 4.9

oMo Rivx

RNER

510208

BALLARD

5~N8

33

33

78/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

CI

Breech 0.0 to

1.9

Ohio River

RIVER

5090201

LEWI3

SPS

33

33

4882004

WAH FC PCR 3CR

305(b) Ass

it RssuNi, 2008

C~d~t Crs~k O

.O l0 5.2

Cedr Crs~k 4.21011.1

In River O.Ol023.1

___

Sall Rivx

Sall Rfwr

S~kRiver

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

5140102

5740102

51A0103

BULLITT

J EFFERSON

NELSON

2~F8

2~FS

2-F$

32 fS

SNS

3 32-F$

3 3 3

3 3 3

9I2W2005

3H2/2001

1 ?H/2005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

W/W, FC PCR, scR

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

M River 10.910 54.2

____ _

SaR River

RIVER ~

5110103

WASHINC3TON

2-FS

33

33

920/Z005

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

in River d3.0 to 89.7

___ _ _.

C

in RH~r 68.7 to 7E

Sak RWer

RNER

~ RIVER ~

5140103

MERCER

SNS

33

33

Il9@001

WAH FC PCR SCR

SaR River

5140103

MERCER

~ 2-F$

33

33

~l912001

WAH FC PCR SCR

In Rlwr 32.8 to 32.8

_S~fl Rivx

RIVER

51,0103

WASHINGTON

2-F8

33

33

1!'9/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

ChN~e Lick 0.7101.4

Sift River

RIVER

51 0103

ANDERSON

5-PS

33

33

10/612005

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Ch~rwwMh Ran 0.0 b 5.2

_SNt Rlwr

RNER

~5110102

JEFFERSON

M4P3

5~N3

33

33N2f2007

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Ch~now~M~ Run 5.2 b 9.2

___

Saft River

RNER

5140102

JEFFERSON

~A.p3

5-NS

33

33H2/2001

WAH FC PCR, SCR

CNdu~w+P~ric Pond

______

Sek River

POND

5140107

JEFFERSON

33

35~P3

370/72005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Clpr Croak O to 4.4

Sak Rlvar

RNER

67 0103

HARDIN

SKIS

33

33

MB/2001

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Clan Creek 0.0 to 11.0

SaR River

RIVER

5140102

SHELBY

6-NS

33

33

7172/2001

WAH, FC PCR SCR

ComCnek O.Oto+.1

S~ItRivsr

RIVER

5110101

TRIMBLE

2-FS

33

33

812/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cox Cnelc 17.21015.5

3~R River

RIVER

5140102

NELSON

5-P8

33

33

72812000

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Cox Cask 0.0 to 4.7

Sell Rivsr

RIVER

51 0102

BULLITT

2 -FS

S~PS

2-FS

33

1212/2005

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Croolad Creek 1.0 to

10.1

S~k River

RNER

5140702

SPENCER

2-FS

33

33

81212000


Crooked Creek 5.8 to

12.8

Salt River

RIVER

5740103

BULLITT

S-N8

33

33

81t 12000

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Fork 0.0 to ~.8

Sall Rlver

RIVER

51A0102

OLDHAM

S -P8

5-NS

2-F8

33

12HI2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Doctors Fork 0.0 to 3.8

S~It Rfver

RIVER

5110103

BOYLE

2fS

33

33

10f112005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Dw Run 4.1 to 7.9

Sak River

RNER

5140104

MEADE

2-FS

5-NS

33

32-FS

3/82001

11H5/Z005

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Doi Val

L~k~

Sett River

RESERVOIR

51 0704

MEADE

33

~ 33

~~

ENt Fork Bsxh Fork 0.0 to 1.9

SaR River

RNER

5140103

WASHINGTON

SPS

~~ 3

33

3 32-FS

_

7017/2005

x/4@000

WAH, FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

_

_E~~l Fork Cox Crwk 0.0 to 4.3

Salt River

_RIVER

5140102

BULLITT ~

2-FS

3~ 3

_ _,_3

~ 3 ~

F Bmeh R~s~mir

SaH Rlwr

RESERVOIR

5740103

MARION

33

370H82D05

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fem Cn~k 1.310 ~.4

SNt Rhror

RNER

5140702

JEFFERSON

5-NS

5-NS

33

35/2/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fpm Creek 0.0 to 1.3

SNt River

RNER

51 0102

JEFFERSON

5-PS

S~N8

33

3 '

3122/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fpm Crs~k 4.1 to 5.9

SaH River

RIVER

5140102

JEFFERSON

5-PS

5-NS

33

33H2I2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fi

Crs~k

O.O to1.9

SNt R{vr

RIVER

5140102

JEFFERSON

2 -FS

2-FS

33

332/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

F Fork 0.0 to 11.8

SNt Rhnr

RNER

5140102

BULLfTT

2-FS

5-NS

2-FS

2-FS

39f202005

WAH FC PCR SCR

F

Fak11.8to24.2

SdtRiwr

RIVER

510/02

JEFFERSON

4A-NS

5-NS

3_

33

1W75/1999

WAH FC PCR SCR

F

Fork 24.2 to 31.1

S~k River

RIVER

b1~10102

JEFFERSON

5-NS

5-PS

2-FS

33

12/7/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

F

Fak 34.7 to 81.9

Sall River

RIVER

51 0102

SHELBY

4A-PS

33

33

12/12005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Gl~ru Croak 0.0 to 4.8

Salt River

RNER

51 0

'103

WASHINGTON

5-PS

33

3.3

10/10l20~D5

WAH FC PCR SCR

Gown CrsNc 0.3 to

3.8

SNt River

RIVER

b1~0101

JEFFERSON

5-PS

b -NS

33

33172/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

C;ow~ Cask 3.6 to 13.0

SaR River

RIVER

51 0101

JEFFERSON

5-PS

5-NS

33

33/15/2001

WAHFC PCR SCR

-- --- -

GravM Cn~k 0.7 to

2.9

-S~It Rhnr

-

-RNER

--510102

-BULLITT

---

... 2-FS

-- 2-FS --

..._5 -PS

._5-NS

3

- -3-3-

._3

_3 3

~

-. 3-

-- 3 32-FS

3

-.-

- . _3 _.

.._

__.

- _ _.._ _ 3 .

.. A

_.. __2-FS-•--•

_._2~____.

~ 2-FS

31W10I2005

WAHFC PCR SCR

-..- ------ -

Guist Cn~k OA l015.~

Satt River

,_

_.__

_ - -- RIVER .

--.

-..

---- RIVER _,__

RESERVOIR.

RNER ._ _ _

RIVER

_67 0102

_ _

SHELBY-

_ 3 3

__---WANFC PCR SCR

-

-- -

. - -

GuislCn~k 15.4 to 27.8

---.___._ _._ ._.

._._

GuistCrNkl~ks

___.__..__ ___

H~rwnond Crwk 0.0 to

5.2

_ _ -

~~1°r

-510102

._...

--

._. .SHELBY _,

_ SHELBY

ANDERSON

.-- -

3125/2002

--3125f2002

--.-

WAHFC PCR SCR

_SNtRiver

_5740102

5140102

S~PS--

_BI

Tti12005-1I31f200e

WAHFC PCR SCR

SMI River !

3 39/~l2000

7f28l2000

WAH

WFC

SCR

FC PC SCR

Hrdins Cn~k 0.0 to

SA

~ ~

SNl River

51 0704

BRECKINRIO(iE

5-NS

33

3Hrdins Creak 0.0 to 7.0

Salt River

RIVER

5140103

WASHINGTON

2-FS

33

33

317f2001

WAHFC

9CR

Hudiru Cnelc 13.3 ro

Y2.9 ~

SaR Rlwr

RNER

5740103

MARION

5-PS

33

33

8lB/20W

FC

SCR

Hvdlns CnMc 5.2 to

11.4

S~k River

RIVER

5140104

BRECKINRIDGE

5-PS

33

33

9/2012005

WAHFC

SCR

Creek 1.810 5.8

~Sall RivK

RNER

5740101

TRIMBLE

5 -PS

33

33

3122/2005

FC

SCR

H

CrNk 0.0 to 1.1

Sift River

RIVER

51A0101

TRMABLE

5 -NS

33

33

811!7989

WFC PCR SCR

H~rtodt Croak 0.0 W 3.2

Salt River

RNER

51 0101

OLDHAM

M~-NS

S-PS

2-FS

33

12/12005

FC

SCR

H~rroda Creek 3.2 to

33.3

SNl River

RNER

51 0101

OLDHAM

35-PS

2-FS

33

72/112005

WAHFC

8CR

Hrts Run OA to 1.8

Salt Rfvsr

RNER

51 0103

BULLffT

2-FS

33

33

9120/2005

WAHFC PCR SCR

H

Cnsk 0.0 to

1.3

Salt River

RNER

5140103

MERCER

5-N3

33

33

3!812005

WAH

FC, PCR SCR

Hk~ CnNt 0.0 M 5.5

Salt Rfwr

RNER

51A0101

JEFFERSON

5-NS

33

33

4!9/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

k~di~n Creek O.O l0 29

SNt River

RNER

5740103

MERCER

2-FS

33

33

31E2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

C~lc 0.0 to 0.7

SaR River

RNER

51A0102

SHELBY

5-NS

33

33

8!lf2000

_ WAH FC PCR SCR

Jorw~ Croslc OA to 3.9

~SAM River

RNER

5140103

MARION

5-PS

33

33

x/6@001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lids C~Mc O.O to ~.1

Sett River

RIVER

57 0103

WASHINdTON

2-FS

33

33

311W2005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Lids Rixi Cmk 0.0 to

3.5

SNt Rfwr

RNER

51A0104

BRECKINRIDCiE

5-P$

33

33

7/2Ef2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

LHW (ioos~ Creek 0.0 to 9.2

LktN

Rhrer 0.2 l0 21.4

Salt River

Sak Rtv~r

RNER

RIVER

5140107

5110101

JEFFERSON

TRIMBLE

2-FS

2-FS

5 -PS

2-FS

32-FS

3 33 3

3N2/2001

12/2/200.5

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAM, FC PG SGR

LNW

Rlv~r 21.0 to 27.0

Salt RiVx

RIVER

5140107

HENRY

5-PS

33

33

9/612000

WAH, FC PCR SCR

~iltle gouth Fork d North Rd

For1c OA to 3.7

S~II River

RIVER

5140703

CASEY

2-FS

33

33

9/19/2005

CAH FC PCR SCR

9 N W

305(b) AswauneM Rs~uke, 2008

'~ N

~@l31II

LoautCn~k OAl02A

S~kRiver

RNER

RIVER

5740701

OAR

-SRO L

2-FS

33

33

el~/200p

CAH,FC PC SC

Lilt CrMk 0.0 fo

10.5

S~II RiVef

51 0102

BULLITT

5 -NS

33

33

10H2/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

L Lids Cn~k 3.1 to 21.3

Salt Rlwr

RIVER

5740103

WASHINGTON

2-FS

33

3

~3

619/2004

WAM FC PCR SCR

Run 0.0 M 10.0

SAM River

RNER

5140102

JEFFERSON

2-FS

5 -NS

33

33N312001

WAH FC PCR SCR

l

Run LNcs

_ _Satt River

RESERVOIR

51 0702

JEFFERSON

2 -FS

32 -FS

2 -FS

382&2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Marion

min Wn

Sak River

RESERVOIR

51A0103

MARION

2 -FS

32-FS

33

8/28/ 2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

McNNI LMt~

SCRRivx

RESERVOIR

51/0102

JEFFERSON

2 -FS

32-FS

~ 5 -PS

3826/2005

W/1H FC PC SCR

MNlin~ &anch O

.O l01.5

SaR River

RNER

51A0101

CARROLL

5 -PS

33

33

3110/2005

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Middh Fak

Creak 0.0 to 2.0

SaH River

RIVER

5110101

JEFFERSON

SNS

&NS

33

33/1312001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Middy Fak

Cn~k 2.0 to

2.8

SaR Rfv~r

RIVER

5710101

JEFFERSON

5 -PS

SNS

33

33H3l2001

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Middy Fork

CENk 2.9 to

15.3

SNt RivK

RIVER

5140101

JEFFERSON

5 -PS

5-NS

33

33/122001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Middy Fork Otbr ChNc O.O l0 4

.2Satt River

RIVER

51/0103

LARUE

2 -FS

33

33

UBl2001

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Mils Park Pond N4

Safl Rlv~r

RESERVOIR

5140102

JEFFERSON

33

32-

FS3

1131@OOE

WAM FC PCR, 3CR

Mill

CroNc 0.0 to

11.2

_

_S~H•Riv~r

RNER

_5140107

JEFFERSON

5-NS

5-NS

33

33/13/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mill

Cn~k 11.8 to 23,8

SaH River

RIVER

570102

HARDIN

2 -FS

33

3 ~

3218!2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

MIII

CnNt 8.0 to

7.0

____ _ __

__

S~k Rfwr

~_ _

RIVER .

_RIVER

__ RNER ..__

_ _ RNER

RIVER

--

-- -

RIVER •

_ _

_RNER

. _ 570102

_5140102

51 0103

.._._

5140702

HARDIN

__ 3 _

2 -FS

. __2 -FS_ _

SB-PS

2 -FS

~ 2 -

FS --

-

3 33

5B-N S

32l8f2001

WAH, fC PCR, SCR

Mill

Creek 7.0 W 11.8

SOH Rives

_HARDIN

3-

_ 3 __. ----

3 3--- - -- 3 -.

3~I8f2001

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

MillCn~kO.Ol02.7

-

---__

-.- -

SaRRiver

_..NELSON _ _

HARDIN

,_3_

35-NS

- 3

_3 3

~_3 3

-- 3 -

3 3--

1W12/2005

2/8/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

MIII

C~k Bnndi 0.0 b 0.7

SNt River

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mill

CnNt Cu

toff 0.0 to

8.7 -

------- ----

Sak Rfwr

--

--

57 0101

JEFFERSON

33N22001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Monks Cn~k 0.0 to

1.8 _

_ _

._... - ----

Fork

Cn~k 0.0

to 6

.9Sett Rfwr

-S~k River

51 0103 _

NELSON

3 3--- 1 W12@005

3N212001

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

51 0101

JEFFERSON

2 -FS

5-NS

33

Mwsln &anch 0.0 to

1.7

S~fl River

RNER

51 0103

MARION

4A -NS

,A-NS4A-NS

33

2/1~If2006

WAH FC PCR SC DWS

Noah

Fork O.O to 3.7

Safi RNnr

RIVER

51 0103

MARION

2-FS

33

33

M8f2001

WAH PC PCR SCR

North RoH

Fork 7

8.7 l0 20.8

Sak RW~r

RIVER

51 0103

BOYLE

2 -FS

33

33

~IBl2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Northern Dikh O.O l0 7

.3SaR River

RNER

51 0102

JEffERSON

5-PS

5-NS

33

34H/1998

WAH FC PCR SCR

Othr CrMk 0.0 to

10.7

SNl River

RIVER

514010A

MEADE

2-FS

5-PS

33

33H3f2001

WAH FC PCtt SCR

OH~r Cn~k 0.0 to

2.9

S~k River

RIVER

51 0103

LARUE

2 -FS

5-PS

2-FS

33

10/13/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ov~nlh Croak 0.0 to 1.3

SaH River

RIVER

5140103

BULLITT

2 -FS

33

33

1 W13/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pau rih Run 0.0 to

3.3

~SCR River

RIVER

5140702

JEFFERSON

5 -NS

5-NS

33

3M18/2004

WAH FC PC 3CR DW3

Plwanl Run 4.2 to

8.9

S~k River

RIVER

5140103

WASHINGTON

5-PS

33

33

10/13f2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Plum Crs~k 0.0 to

17.0

Seft River

RNER

RNER

RNER

51 0102

SPENCER

5 -NS

33

33

1011312005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Pond Cn~k O.O!01.5

Sdt River

5140707

OLDHAM

S -PS

33

3 ~

35!2/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR DW3

Pond GMklSaAlNm Ditch 5

.1 l0 8

.1Satt River

5140102

JEFFERSON

5-NS

5-NS

3 33

~ 3

3311312001

CAH FC PCR SCR

P

Cmk 0.0 to

2.1

Sall Rivar

~ RNER

~51 0103

AAARION

2-FS

33

3!25!2002

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Lkk Crs~k 2.0 to

5.2

SaR River

RIVER

51 0102

JEFFERSON

2-FS

5 -NS

3

~3

33HU2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Putt

r CrNk 0.0 ro

5.0 ~

Sift River

~ RNER

51A0103

NELSON

2-FS

3~ 3

33

3!7/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

PrNh~r Creek 0.0 to 3.7

Sall River

RIVER

51 07 '.!

MARION

2 -FS

33

33

MBl2007

WAH FC PCR SC DWS

Road Run O.O to 7.7

SNt River

RNER

5740103

WASHINGTON

5-PS

33

33

1 W13f2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Roq

Fork 100.2 to

107.9

Sall RfvK

RNER

5140103

AAARION

33

33

3WAH FC, PCR, SCR

R

Fork 41.8 to 62.5

Salt River

RNER

57,0103

LARUE

2 -FS

33

33

M10I2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Roll

FoAt 82.5 M 78.3

Sak RNrK

RIVER

5140103

LARUE

2-FS

33

33

_ 8!112000 _

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Fork 78.3 W 93.7

SNI River

RNER

57~Ot0:i

MARION

2 -FS

33

33

317/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Rdl

Fork 9B.25to99.25

S~NRiwr

RNER

51A0703

MARION

33

33

2-FS

10/182005

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

R

Fork O.O l010.7

SaQ River

RIVER

51A010:i

LARUE

2-FS

5-NS

2-FS

33

12!1/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Rowan CnNt O.O l0 7

.4SNt RNr~r

_RIVER

5140103

NELSON

2-FS

33

33

4f10/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Salt L

ids CrNk 0.0 to

8.~

SMl RW~r

RNER

5140703

MARION

2-FS

33

33

B1D12000

WAH FC PCR SCR

SNt Rfwr 11.9 t

o 28.2

Sak River

RIVER

57/0102

BULLI7T

2-FS

_5-NS

2-FS

_ 5 -

PS3

11130/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

SAM RhMr 49.7 W 55.E

SNt Rhrsr

RIVER

51 0102

SPENCER

2-FS

33

33

325@002

WAH FC PCR SCR

S~k River 55.410 55.9

Salt River

RNER

51 0702

SPENCER

2-FS

33

2-FS

33n/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Sak Rive 57.1 to 81.25

SaR Rlv~r

RIVER

5140102

SPENCER

2 -FS

2-FS

2 -FS

32-

FS212N2006

WAH FC PCR SCR

SNt Rives 78.0 M E9.0

SCR RIvK

RNER

51~D702

ANDERSON

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

5-NS

39/2W2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

SaM River BO.S !0111.2

SaN RWa

RIVER

51 0102

ANDERSON

2-FS

33

33

81112000

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

SCR Rlwr 735.5 to

142.8

3~k River

RNER

5140102

I~RCER

2-FS

33

33

1011M2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bench 0.2 W 0.7

SaN RWo

RNER

51 0703

BOriE

2-F3

33

33

418/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

~ ~

Sall River

RESERVOIR

51 0102

SHELBY

SPS

33

33

71H/1909

WAH FC PCR SCR

Shat Creek OA to 5.0

SNt River

RNER

5140103

WASHINGTON

5-PS

33

33

8110f2004

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Si

CrNk 0.0 to

B.D

SAN River

RIVER

5140102

SPENCER

32-

FS3

33

2Hf2001

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Si

Cn~k 15.4 ro'39.7

Salt Rfwr

RNER

51,01 W

BRECKINRIDGE

2-fS

rrPS

3. _ 3

~ __

312Hl2005

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Croak 5.9 a 8.

7 ~

SAM Rivor

RIVER

RIVER

5140104

BRECKINRIDGE

33

33 3

3___

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Skdc

CreNc

B.7 to 15.4

SOU River

5140104

BRECKINRIDGE

5 -PS

5-NS

33

9H0/20D0

WAH FC PCR SCR

305(b) Aa

gnt Results, 20D8

Cbwr CrNk. 7.

7 M 9.2

______ ___

CoMi~ld Crs~k O.O l0 8.9 ___ __ _

__

C

CreMt 2.9 M 8.7

__ _ _ _

_Crooked Cn~k O.O to 12.1

_

Ohio Rivsr

OFro Rlwr

OMo River

Ohb Riwr

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

RNER

~ RNER

RNER

510201

5140203

5 090203

51 0203

BRECKINRIDGE

CRITTENDEN

OALLATIN

CRfiTENDEN

5-PS

2-FS 3

5-PS

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

11N~/2002

1011QR008

2f2820IXi

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

CrookW Creek 0.0 to

5.8

Ohb River

5090201

LEV111S

~2-FS

33

8/2f2000

WAN FC P R SCR

CrookW Cn~k 12.1 to 28.4

_ _________

Ohb River

51 0203

CRfTTENDEN

5-NS

5-NS

_3 3

3~

_3

~ ~

~ 3

3 31/24/2008

3N/2003

WAH FC PCR 3CR

os.r cn.k

o,o r

o e.~

Ohb Rivx

RIVER

RNER

5140203

LIVINGSTON

~DMfnis O'n~n DkdYC

Cn~k 0.4 M 10.9

~Ohfo Riva

5740203

UNION

5-NS

2 -FS

35-NS

32-FS

WAH FC PCR SCR

37/72008

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Daibh Udc CnNc OA l0 3.5

Ohio River

RIVER

5090203

BOONE

2 -FS

33

33

3/7/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

CnMc 0.2 to

7.0

OMo Rlwr

RNER

_5090203

BOONE

5 -PS

33

33

8142000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Crs~k 1

.1 W 3.0

Ohb Rlwr

RNER

5080203

GALLATIN

5-PS

33

33

813!2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

HIII

Cr~Nc 0.

~ to 8.0

Ohb River

RIVER

51 0203

LIVINCiSTON

5-PS

33

33

1123f200B

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Eu

t Fork Cabin Cn~k 0.0 to

4.7

Ohio River

RNER

5090201

LEWIS

2-FS

33

33

1027/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fit Fo

rk d Cress Cn~k O.O 101.4

Ohio Rhnr

_ RNER

51~1020Z

HENDERSON

5-PS

33~ 3 3

~~3

7 W7/2007

WAH, FC, PCR •SCR

EI

Cn~k D.0 W 5.2

_OMo River

RNER

5090203

BOONE

~4A -NS

33

3M11I2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

F ish L.ak~

Ohb River

LAKE

RNER

- --

- -

__ RNER

_ _

_ RIVER

_ _

_

RIVER

---

RNER

_ _

_RIVER

_ _

_ RIVER

_ _

RNER

RIVER

51 0208

BALLARD

33

3 35-PS

33

1f31R008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fourmil~ C1Nk 0.210 8.6

---

Ohio River

- -

--5090201

CAMPBELL

~~~~ 2-FS

5-NS

3B!3/200D

WAH FC PCR SCR

FarmiN Cn~k 8.5 to

9.4

___

Ohb Rfwr

5090201

CAMPBELL

. 2-FS

2 -FS

3 3 3 3

3 3 3~ 3

~

3_ _ 3 _

3 3

~ ~

3 3 3

M1012001

WAH, FC PCR SCR

G~Ri~Ofl CfMk 0.010 4.85

___ ___

Ohb River

SOD0203

BOONE

3/72005

~WAH FC, PCR, SCR

C,oaN CnNc O.O 101.9

Ohio RNrer

_5090201

51 0203

BRACI~N

UNION

5 -PS

~ S-NS

_813@000

WAH FC PC SCR

(3oa~ Pond DifeFVWrd~ns S

0.0 to 13.8 ---

Ohio River

33Nf2003

WAH FC PGR SCR

Gna Forts 0

.0 to

3.9

__ ___ . _. _

__ _

Ohb Rfvx

_SD90201 __

_ 5090203

5090203

_ LEWIS

__BOONE

2-FS

5-NS

~A-NS

_3

_3

_ 3 3~ 3

_ 3

__.__

3 3~

11/'112005

~_

1/8/2007

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

Cn~k 0.0 to

75.0

_____

____ . _ ____

Crok 15A to 17.1

Ohb River

WAH, FC PCR SCR

_Ohb River

_BOONE

33 3

__

33

BI3I199D

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Creak 1B.91o21.8

OhbRivsr

5090203

BOONE

5 -PS

33

351Y/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

H

Hollow Wc~

OMo Rfwr

LAKE

510208

BALLARD

33

33

3WAH FC PCR 3CR

H Ind Croak O.Ol07.6

OhbRiver

RNER

5140202

UNION

5 -PS

5-NS

33

3A/7H9DE

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ind Clwk 7.8 to

21.4

Ohb River

RNER

51 0202

HENDERSON

5-NS

5 -NS

5-NS

33

1/12/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hood Cn~k 0.0 to

5.4

Ohb River

RIVER

5090103

BOYD

2-FS

2 -FS

33 3

-- --

3 --- •--

--- .

3 i.__

- _ -- 3~ _-.-

_ _- -

- 3 -3

. _ 3

. _

._...

-.-3--

. _

..

.__.. - 3 - -

..3

31H812004

WAH FC PCR SCR

CrMk 0.0 M 3.7

OMo River

RIVER

-- --~ RIVER

~RNER

RIVER

_RESERVOIR

RNER

- -

--

RESERVOIR _

_-. _RESERVOIR.-

-...

_... RIVER

- -

--RNER

51 0208

BALLARD

5-P9

2 -FS

58-PS

2-FS

_ 2-FS

2-FS

. .__-. _

_ 2_FS

__

5-N3 .

..5-PS

.. .._

2-FS

2 -FS

5-PS

3 33

5!2/2002

CAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Croak 3J to 11.8

---------- -

Cf~Nc 11.51013.0 ---~ -~--- -- -

~ kMi~n CnNt 0.0 to

9.~

Ohb Rlwr -

OMo River

Ohio Rfv~r

Ohb RW~r

~ 5140208

.5140206

5090201

_ 5140201

_5 0D0201

. T--

_ 5110203

_.._.._CRf1TENDEN

5140101

BALLARD

3-

5/21200't

. _-

WAH FC PCR SCR

BALLARD

5B -PS3

- 9 --

2-FS

. . --

. 3 _

_ 3 _

. 9 _3

- 3 -

-- 32-FS-

2 -FS

----

.2-FS .

....._

Z -FS

...3 _

_3

35@12002

WAH, FC PCR SCR

L EWIS

_DAVIESS .

.L EWIS

_

- 3

1/10/2001

_ _W/W, FC, PCR, 3CR

_--- ~` _. _ .

_~

'. 3 3 3

_ _

._3

.-.3 3

~

_ _._ __

71H,@008

_9/

2012005

_ 71HM2008

_ _

.--- 8/2812005

_17

l3f2005

__WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

__ -.---- ----- -

-•Kirxiioonick Cis~k 0.0 to 50.9 ---~-------~-- -

-•--

L~k~

Mrion C

l.ak~~---.

..-

----_-

-~

~K{~q

-.-----_- - ---,- --_--

LwnlFork5.8to15.9

_... _.

_ .

..-- - --- ---

L~wnr~ Cn~k 2.610 4.

2

__ .

Ohio Rfwr

-

---

_-Ohio River__

OhbRiwr

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC'PCR SCR DYVS

--_

---

OhbRiwr

--5090207

5090201

.---HENRY

_._

WAH FC PCR SCR

_OMo Rfver

_LEWIS

_MASON

---

__~

11/3/2005

CAH, FC PCR SCR

L~~d Cn~k 0.0 to

0.8

Ohb River

RIVER

~ ~5140201

HANCOCK

2-FS

2-FS

33

M1I199B

WAH FC PCR SCR

Uad Crs~k 3.5 to

4.5

Ohb R{ver

RNER

510201

HANCOCK

58 -NS

58 -NS

3_

_3

_3

34I1N98G

WAH FC PCR SCR

LN Cnek 0.0 to

2.0

Ohb River

RNER

5090201

MASON

33

33

3WAH CAH FC PC SCR

LittN

Cn~k OA l0 7.2

Ohb River

RIVER

5140208

McCRACKEN

4MPS

33

SNS

35/2f2002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Litd~ So~Ah Fak 1.2 to

5.9

~Ohb Rivx

RIVER

5060203

BOONS

2-FS

33

33

M2~/100~

_ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Loam CnNt 0.0 W 4.1

Ohb River

RIVER

~~5080201

BRACI~N

2-FS

5-NS

33

3~IN2000

_WAH FC PCR SCR

Locwt Cn~k 4.1 to 12.2

Ohb Rives

RIVER

5080201

BRACI~N

5 -NS

33

33

B/81200D

WAH FC PCR SCR

pq~

Ohio Rivx

LAIC

5140206

BALLARD

33

33

3WAH FC PC SCR

Mwac Cask ~

.1 ro 4.7

~Ohb River

RNER

RIVER

5140208

McCRACKEN

5-PS

33

33

5/2/2002

WAM FC PCR SCR

Mgtac ~~Nk 4,7 ~p

7,g

Ohb Rlwr

5110208

McCRACKEN

2-FS

3 332 -FS

3_ 3 _

35/

112002

WAH FC PCR SCR

~Ohb Rfwr

RESERVOIR

5140202

UNION

2-FS

_3

11M~12008_

WAH FC PCR SCR

McCod~ Crs~k O.O l0 8

.7 J

OMo River

RNER

5080203

CARROLL -

33

3 -

3-

--- 3 -

---

-- -

-- 5-P3 -- -

3

3- __

WAH FC PC 8CR

Fork 0.010 2.2

OMo Rlwr

RIVER '

--5090203

-- BOONS

3- 3

3- 3

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

~OMoRiva

LAKE

510208

McCRACKEN

SPS

32-

FS3

1HI2000-3!82008

WAH FC PC SCR

Mlddl~ Fak d Mw~c CnMc 0.

0 W 8.4

Ohb Rives

RNER

51 0208

McCRACKEN

SPS

33

33l21f2007

WAH FC PC 8CR

~ ~OMo River

RESERVOIR

510208

BALLARD

33

33

3WAH FC PC SCR

Crs~kO.Olo6.5

M~xllidc Cn~k OA l0 8.8

Mudlidc Cn~k 8.81011.3

&MCh O

.O l0 2.8

N.w~on• Cask o.3 ro

e.2 ----- ..

. _ _ .. .---.-

Phu~nt Run CnNc 0.

2 !0 3.4

OhbRN~r

Olio River

Ohb Rtva

Ohio Rfv~r

., ---- Ohw River-

-O

F~fo River

RIVER

RNER

RNER

RNER

-

RNER-

RNER

5080207

5090203

5080203

~~M103

- - 51,02D8.

5090203

LEWIS

BOONS

BOONS

GREENUP

NkCRACKEN

.._

5-PS

3 35-NS

._-

- 5-P3

-2 -FS

3 3 3_

3-- 3 3

3 3 3 3-

- 3 -

3

32-

FS 3 3---

3 3 y ~

3 3 3 3 9 3

3M11l005

Ef92000

_

71/11!2003

. _ 3H212007 - -

7192004

WAH fC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

_ WAH FC PCR, 8CR

_ --

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

KENTON

WAH FC PCR SCR

305(b) As~sumsnt Rsault~, 2009

'~ N

P CnNc 2,

4 to 7.25

R~~~ ~

S~dl~r C~k 0.010 2.

4Salt L

ids CnNt 0.2 M 7.2

. 510201

DAVIESS

OLDHAM

L IVINGSTON

L EWIS

2 -FS

2-FS

5 -PS

5 -PS

3 3 3 3

32 -FS 3 3

32-FS 3 3

3 3 3 3

112M2008

Bl26r2005

1@4/2008

BI212004

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ohb Riwr

Ohb R1VM

Ohb RW~r

Ohb River

RIVER

RESERVOIR

RNER

RNER

5140101

510203

5 090201

Sonic Lake

S~caid

C►Nk

0.5

t0 2

.9O

hb R

iver

Ohb

Rive

rRE

SERV

OIR

R IVE

RLA

KE

51 0

202

5090

203

HEND

ERSO

NBO

ONE

5-PS

2 -FS

3 33 3

3 33 3

1H11

962

17/e

R005

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, 3CR

Wa

Oh{o

Rive

r51

4020

8BA

LIAR

D~

33

33

3W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRCn

~k 0

.510

5.5

_-

---

-O

hb R

iver

RIVE

R50

9020

1BR

ACKE

N3

5 -NS

3~ ~

~ 3

3 3E

/14

/20

00

'W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRSo

ulh F

ork

CrN

k 4.

1 l0

8.8

_ __

SaA

h Fo

rk

Crs~

k OA

to 2

.0 _ _

__. _

_

__

Ohi

o Rive

r_

_. R

NER

__ __

RIVE

R_ _

RN

ER

_-- R

IVER

_---

RIVE

R_

_ R

NER

_

RIVE

R__

_

LAKE

5090

203

BOO

NE__

_ 3

5-NS

33

~'~

3-

---

~. _ 3

_

~ -

-- ~

- 3 -~

--

-_

._--

3 --

---

--- 3

~-

---

- 3

----

3/3x

200 1

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

Ohb

RW~r

5080

203

- .50

9020

3 _

.5 0

9020

1

BOO

NE-

GAL

LATI

N_.,

LEW

IS -

-

_5 -

NS_ .

2-F

S -..

-2-

FS5 -

N3

- 5

-pS

~. ._ -

5-P

S2-

FS

3.

3 _

3 3-

3- 8 -

3_

3 _-~

3 3-

8 3 ~

3 34/

7012

001

~~8/

1020

00 ~

~-•

~ W

AH, F

C. P

CR, S

CRS

CnN

c 0.

0 to

1.0 ~

-•--

-

---•

----

. _

_fo

rk O

.O 10

1.9

. --- _

-~- ------.

Ohb

Rive

r_._

-O

hio

Ww

r -~

---

Ohb

Riw

rOh

b Ri

ver

__

---W

AH~ F

C, P

CR, S

CR --

-- 3

-

3--

- U1

1120

01W

AH. F

C. P

CR, S

CRS

Cn~

k O

.Oto

1.3

----

-•-

-•--

.--•

-.--

---

T~rrM

N C

n~k

0.05

to 1.

15_.

..--

-- •

• --

-.. --

-- _

-Tn

aCro

~k0.

21o4

.8

.---

---

. ..-

-- ---

Turr~

r Wu

__

__

,_

_

_

5140

203_

5090

201

5 080

201

_ _ U

NIO

N -

-b

AMPB

ELL

L EW

IS

---

BALL

ARD

----

3/1/

2003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

3 33H

6l20

05W

AH, F

C. P

CR, S

CR-

Ohi

oRfw

r _

17H~

@00

5_

_W

AH,F

C P

CR S

CROh

b Ri

ver

5140

206

32-

FS ~

33

1123

2008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

TwN

vs A

AiM C

n~k

3.51

0 9.0

Ohi

o Ri

ver

RIVE

R50

9020

1CA

MPB

ELL

2-FS

33

33

8H 1/

2000

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

T wN

wm

iN C

roak

10.~I

1013

.2O

hio

F2iw

rRI

VER

5oD0

201

CAM

PBEL

L2 -

FS3

33

31H

4I20

05W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRUT

to B

C

ask

1 A to

1.8

Ohi

o Ri

ver

RIVE

R50

9020

3G

ALLA

TIN

2 -FS

33

33

3/ 1

2005

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

UT to

Chi

mp

&ar

eh 0

.0 to

1.1

Ohb

Rive

rRI

VER

5090

103

GRE

ENUP

S~NS

33

33

11/1

W20

03W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RU

T to

E

Cree

k O

A to

1.8

OM

o Rive

rRI

VER

5140

203

UNIO

N58

-NS

SB-N

S3

33

1f2,

1200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RUT

to

&in

ch O

A to

7.4

Ohb

Rive

rRI

VER

51 0

208

BALL

ARD

58-P

S58

-PS

33

35/

2/20

02W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRUT

to M

uwc

Cn~

k O

A to

0.~

Ohi

o Ri

ver

RN

ER51

1020

8AA

cCRA

C1~N

5B-P

SSB

-PS

33

331

1/20

07W

AH, F

C PC

R, S

CRU

T W

Mp

uc

Croa

k 0.

0 to

0.7

_

_

__ _

_O

hio R

iver

~R

NER

_51

+020

8M

cCRA

CKEN

3SB

-PS

33

3Sf

212W

2W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CRU

T to

M~u

~c C

n~k

0.0

W 1.

7 _

_,_

_ _

___ _

Ohb

Rive

rR

NER

51 0

208

McC

RACK

EN2 -

FS3

3_

__

3

__

__

3

___

__..

3 _,_

__

3 3

31 W

1oR0

o8W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRUT

to O

hb R

hnr 3

.55

to 3

.7

__

Ohb

Rive

rRI

VER

5702

08M

cCRA

CKEN

5B-P

S3

33

_3H

2/20

07W

AH F

C, P

CR, S

CRU

T to

Rw

h C

n~k

0.0

to 1

.3

__

__

_ _

_ .

Ohb

Rive

r_

RIVE

R _

51A0

203

CRIIT

ENDE

N5-

PS3

33

,__ ___

70H

0120

08

_12

,/200

83!1

9/20

07

~5/

2/20

02

_W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRUT

to U

T to

E

Crs~

kO

hio

Rlvs

rRI

VER

5102

03UN

ION

SB-N

S3

SB-N

S3

~~3

3 3 3 3

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

UT W

UT

to W

nt F

ak o

f M~s

uc C

n~k

0.0

W 0

.7O

hio

Rive

rR

NER

5110

208

McC

RACK

ENSB

-NS

~ W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RW

AH F

C PC

R SC

RU

T to

Wirt

For

k AA

~uac

CrN

k 0.

0 to

0.8

Olio

RW

~rR

NER

RIVE

R51

A020

8M

cCRA

CKEN

SB-P

3SB

-PS

33

~ y 3

~ 3

UT

to N

hd

Fak

of A

Awue

CrN

k 0.

0 ro

0.8

Ohb

Rive

r51

1020

8M

cCRA

CKEN

58-P

S3

3 3~~

3!

1912

007

WAH

FC,

PCR

, SCR

UT to

Wut

For

k W

Mus

ic C

nNc 1

.75

to 2.

0O

hb R

ivx

RIVE

R51

4020

3AA

cCRA

CKEN

5•PS

33

3N91

2007

WAH

FC

PCR,

SCR

WN

l For

k of M

usic

CnN

c 0.

0 to

0.3

Ohb

Rive

rRI

VER

5110

208

McC

RACK

EN5B

-PS

33

33

I/1H

99B

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Wes

t For

k d M

usic

Cn~

k 1.

0 to

8.2

Ohi

o Ri

ver

RIVE

R51

020

8M

cCRA

CKEN

2-FS

33

33

1 W10

l200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RW

Crs~

k 17

.8 to

1~.0

Ohi

o Ri

ver

RIVE

R50

9020

3BO

ONE

5 -NS

5-NS

33

38/

1020

00W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

RW

Cn~

k 2.

B l0

7.2

Ohi

o Rlw

rR

NER

5080

203

BOO

NE3

5-NS

33

38H

0120

00W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RM

ME

Cn~

k 0.

~ W

B.8

Salt R

iver

RN

ER57

1010

2NE

LSO

N2-

FS3

33

37 W

5J20

05W

AH F

C PC

R 8C

RCn

~k 0

.510

1.8

Sall R

iver

RN

ER51

4010

1JE

FFER

SON

5 -NS

33

33

511/

2002

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

B~w

~r C

reek

0.0

to 2

0.9

SCR

Rive

rRI

VER

51A0

103

ANDE

RSO

N2-

fS3

33

341

9200

1W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CRgN

yK 1

.~Sa

k Rlv~

rRE

SERV

OIR

5101

03AN

DERS

ON

2-FS

34C

-PS

33

825/

2005

WAH

, FC

PCR,

SCR

BMeh

CrM

k 4.

6 to

19.8

SaH

Rive

rRI

VER

5140

102

- 57

401 0

351

4010

3

SHEL

BY2-

FS- -

2-F

S --

-2 -

FS _

_.2 -

FS

_ _2-

FS2-

FS

5 -NS

5-NS

33

1015

@00

5W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RBN

ch F

ork

109.

7 to

717

.9Sa

R R

fwr

RN

ER

--M

ARIO

N -NE

LSO

N-

3- 3

---

3 --

310

15/2

005

WAH

FC

PCR

3CR

BMch

For

k 39

.5 to

50.4

Sett

RNer

RIVE

R ~

RIVE

R~ R

NER

RIVE

R-

---

RN

ER

- -

~_ 5-N

S~ _

_3. 3 3

2_FS

_ 3 3 3

2 -FS

~

~ 3 3 3

---- -

3

- --

-

381

2W20

~5W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR8e

~ch F

ork

49.7

to 56

.5Sa

R Ri

ver

5140

103

WAS

HING

TON

3 3 3

BH 1/

2000

8N 11

2000

72/2

1200

5

CAH

FC P

CR

SCR

,._

.___

____

_Be

echF

ak 5

8.51

085.

3Be

wh

Fork

0.0

to 12

.0Se

tt Rive

r57

4010

351

4010

357

A010

3

WAS

HING

TON

N ELS

ON

WI1

H FC

,PC

R S

CR D

WS

SaR

Rive

rW

AH F

C PC

SC

R8

SaAh

Fork

18.

8101

8.0 --- -

------

--~

SaR

Riw

r -

MAR

ION

2 -FS -

3 -

--3

3--

1W

6/20

05 ~

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

B'

Saut

h For1

c 0.0

to 12

.4Sa

lt Rive

rRI

VER

514D

103

MAR

ION

2 -FS

5 -PS

2-FS

33

9H 1/

2000

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

BIu~

Di

tch 0

.0 to

2.1

~

Salt R

fvsr

RN

ER57

010

2JE

FFER

SON

2-FS

5-NS

33

328

4/20

06W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RBn

N►

Nn

Crs~

k 0.

0 W

13.

0Sa

R R

ivK

RN

ER51

A010

2SP

ENCE

R2-

FS5 -

NS2-

FS3

312

/220

05W

AH F

C PC

R, S

CR8n

~h

ws

Cn~

k 13

.0 to

25.

8S~

k Rive

rR

NER

51 0

102

SHEL

BY2-

F83

33

39/

2012

005

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Broo

ks R

un O

.O l0

2.5

S~II R

iver

RN

ER51

4010

2BU

LLIT

T5 -

PS2-

FS3

33

_ 2!

9200

1 _

WAH

, FC,

PC

R S

CRBr

ooks

Run

2.S

l0 4.

1Sa

lt Rfv

KR

NER

51A0

102

BULL

ITT

5 -PS

5-PS

33

32!

1/20

08W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRBr

ooks

Run

4.1

to 6.

1 ~

S~II R

lwr

RIVE

R51

070

257

4010

2BU

LLIIT

MER

CER

SPS

5-NS

33

34/

7!20

08

_W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RBu

dvna

n C

n~k

O.O l

0 3.

7 ~

Sift

Rive

rR

NER

2-FS

33

33

1 WBl

2005

WAH

FC

PCR,

SCR

Budc

twm

Cro

ak O

.O l0

2.3

Sdt

Rive

r.-

- - .

..RIV

ER-

--_

_ _ RI

VER

__ _

RNER

_ _.

5110

103_

5740

102

MAR

ION

._2-

FS .

2-F3

, - -

9 --

. ...__

.._3

3 3 3

_ ._

M1N

9YE

7/20

@00

082

EI20

05

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

_- --.

--------

Bullit

t Lkk

Cn~

k O.

O l0

2.3

__. _

__

_ _

__

Bull~

kfn C

rNk

0.0

to 3

.4

---

--__

_

Safl R

lwr_

___

S~It

Rfvs

rBU

LLIT

T. _

,5-

PS2-

FS2-

FS

3 3 3 __

_3~_

_~S

NS

3 3 ~ ~

3

3 3 ~

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

_.51

4010

2_

3HEL

BYW

AH F

C PC

SC

RC~

nsR

txl 0

.010

7.8

S~NR

iv~r

__. _

_RI

VER

____

RNER

5101

02JE

FFER

SON

___

3 __

2-FS

~ 3

3_

415!

2001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

DWS

__

__

__

__

C C

~k

0.0

to 8.

8__

3~M

Rive

r51

070

3W

ASHI

NGTO

NSP

S3

4!91

2001

WAH

fC

PCR

SCR

C B.

E 101

2.8

SNt R

iver

RN

ER51

0703

WAS

HING

TON

5 -PS

33

3~1

6I20

01W

AH F

C PC

3C

R

305(b) Ae

r ant Resulla, 2008

.5140107

South Fork

Crs~k 0.0 to 2.7

South Fork

Cn~k 2.7 to 13.8

SoulMbm Ditd~ O.O l0 6.9

Cn~k 0.0 W 10.0

S ~

T

WII~ I.alu

Cnelt 0.0 to 9.2

_CfMit 0.0 W 2.5

___

SAN River

SNt RNsr

5aft Rlwf

S~II River

Sall River

Salt River

S~fl Rivx

Sak River

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

RESERVOIR

RESERVOIR

RNER

RNER

51A0101

51,0102

5140103

51 0103

5140702

5140103

5140104

JEFFERSON

J EFFERSON

JEFFERSON

ANDERSON

NELSON

SPENCER

MERCER

HARUIN

5 -PS

5-NS

2-FS

2 -FS

2 -FS

4A -PS

5 -PS

5-PS

5-NS

5-NS

5-NS

5-PS

3 3 3 3

3 3 32-FS

2-FS

2-FS

3 3

3 3 3 3 3S~PS

3 32 -FS

~

3 3 3 32-FS

3 3 3

3H5J2007

3 H512001

4/1l19GB

1 4/12005

828/1005

2/2E2006

3N7/2005

1 011~l2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

WAH FC PCR SCR

Tom Wdl~cs L~

__ _- ----

SaN River

RESERVOIR

~ 51 0102

JEFFERSON

3 ~

3 33

39!2512007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Town Crwk 0.0 to

,.1

Sak River

RNER

RIVER

~ ~

51A0103

NELSON

2-FS

__ 5-NS.

_ _5-N8

~ _3 __

2 -FS

3~

33

M71/2001

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

UT to Brooks Run OA to 2.0

_

_

_Satt RNK

51 0702

__ _ BULLfTT

6.N8

3~ 3 3

~~ 3

~3

~ ~

3 3 3

81511999

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Bufhlo Run 0.0 to 1.7

Sak River

RIVER

_ __ RIVER _, _._,

RNER

5140102

BULLITT

M8120W

9/30I20D5

WAH FC PCR 6CR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

UT to Carmon Creek OA to 1.9 _____ ___ _

__Sak River

_ 5140101

51 0101

HENRY

~ ~

--

58 -NS

3 3

SB-NS

~ 3

~UT to Com Creek 0.0 W 2.0

___ _

SCR Rfwr

TRIMBLE

3 3'-

~~ 3

~~3

3 31W10/Z005

4 /8f20M

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

WAH, FC PCR SCR

UT to GNn~ Crack 0.0 to

2.3

Salt Rfwr

._

RNER

51 0103

WASHINGTON

~2-FS

UT to Hrrma~d Creek O.O !0

1.8

SaR River

RIVER

51 0102

ANDERSON

5 -NS

33

33

4!8!2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to N. Fak C

Fork O.O l0 0.1

SOH Wver

RIVER

5140102

OLDHAM

358 -NS

33

39/2812005

WAH, FC PCR SCR

UT to Pond Crs~k O.O l0 0.5

Sift River

RIVER

51 0101

OLDHAM

5-NS

33

33

4/122007

WAW FC PCR SCR

UT to Pond CnNc 0.5 to 0.9

SaN River

RNER

51 0701

OLDHAM

2-FS

33

33

M12noo7

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT a Roll

Fork o.0 to 0.6

Salt River

RIVER

5140103

MARION

~A-NS

4A -NS4A -NS

33

2114!2008

WAH FC PCR, SCR

UT to SaR River 0.0 to 2.4

___

Sail River

__ RIVER

__5140102

MERCER

5-pS

33

33

5/4I20W

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Souttrrn DNch O.O l0 2.8

Sak River

RIVER

~ ~

RNER

~ RNER

~RNER

510102

JEFFERSON

5-NS

33

33 3

4N8/2004

1 W1012005

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to UT to Guist Cnsk O.O l0 2.4

~ i

SeN River

~ S1I0102

SHELBY

5-PS

3'

35-NS

3

3 3 3 ~3

3 3 3~

~ 3

Wed Fork Otter Croak 0.0 to 3.1

Sall River

51 0103

LARUE

2-FS' ~

S-PS

~~3

3 3 3

10/17f20U5

M117909

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ws~wod~ Creek S

Dileh 0.0 to 3.7

Sift River

51 0702

~~ 51A0101

JEFFERSON

~ HENRY

WAH FC PCR SCR

VYhlu Su

Cn~k O

.O l0 3.9

S~It Rivx

RIVER

WAH FC PCR SCR

Will

! Wc~

Safl Rfwr

RESERVOIR

5140103

WASHINGTON

SPS

32-FS~

32-FS

8128/2005

WAH FC PCR SCR

callow Pond

Salt RW~r

POND

5110107

JEFFERSON

3

~3

32-FS

310f7rzo0.5

WAH FC PC SCR

Wilson Crs~k O.O !02.2

S~k River

RIVER

51 0103

BULLfTT

SNS

33

33

1W17f2005

WAH FC

8LR

Wilson CreNt 9.5 to 18.4

SaR River

RIVER

57 0103

BULLITT

2-FS

33

33

4/1312008

WAH FC

8CR

WNfxow Cn~k 0.0 to

3.9

S~k RWx

RIVER

5140703

NELSON

S-PS

33

33

1 W17/2005

WAH FC

Wolf Cn~k 0.0 to

8.7

SaM River

RNER

5140104

MEADE

33

33

3W

FC

8CR DWS

YMlowbr~ Crs~k 1.5 to 12.0

Sak River

RIVER

51401 W

BRECKINRIDOE

SPS

33

33

9202005

VWW FC

8CR

Y

CnNc O.O l0 4

.53Nl Rfvar

RIVER

5140103

HARDIN

5-P3

33

33

1 W17I2005

WAN FC

8CR

NxNnon Cn~k 1.9 to

5.0

T~~we River

RIVER

8W0005

GALLOWAY

2-FS

33

33

2!212007

WAH FC

SCR

Croak 0.0 b 0.8

T~rciss~sa RNrar

RNER

8040008

MARSHALL

5-PS

5-N9

33

33!2512002

FC

aCR

Bwr Croelt 0.8 W 1.8

Terx~su~s River

RNER

BWOODB

GRAVES

58-PS

SB-PS

33

35/420D2

FC PCR SCR

Bar Cn~k ~A l0 7.2

Tux~s~~ Rlvsr

RIVER

8040005

MARSHALL

35-NS

33

33@52002

WAH FC P6R SCR

Bas Cn~k 0.0 b 07

T~atw River

RNER

~

RNER

.,_

._ _ _

, RIVER

RNER

RNER

8W0008

~ 8WOD08

~GALLOWAY

SNS

_ 2 -FS

_... _2F8_ .

5-NS

5-NS

3

3 3~

__3.

3.-••-. 8

.~

. -_3--

_..

_.

3~~

~ 3

~- -- _. 3 . _

_-

... ~

3

._

331252002 - 2/22/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

BNCn~kOJto2A

T~rxNtweRive

rCAILOWAY

33/258002-11112007

WAH.FC.PCR,SCR

._.____

Cnsk 0.5 ro

3.7

Terx»awa Rivx

-~-

-_ BW0005 _

BW0008

- ..

GALLOWAY

3 .

3 3~ 3

--

--

WAN. FC, PCR. SCR

--

----

Bllard Pond 4.8 M 5.d

T~x»~sw River

McCRACKEN

58-PS

SPS

b8 -PS

SNS

_3 3

. __.._.8N02000

S f?J2002

~ tON012008

W

FC PCR SCR

Blfa~rd Pond

C~rrl D.0 b 3.7

~Tennsuee RWx

8W0008

McCRACKEN

WAH FC

SCR

Blood River 10.7 to 18.7

-----••---• '

Tarw~ws River

~ RNER

80 0005

GALLOWAY

2-FS

3S~PS•-3 --

3'-

7/5!2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Creek

O.O l0 5.~

~T~ts~ River

RNER ~

8W0006

McCRAC1~N

5-PS

33!2512002

FC

SCR

C

Cn~k O.O!01.5

T~weRiver

RNER

8W0008

McCRACI~N

5 -NS

33

33

3!252002

WAH FC PC SCR

Ch~Wwt CnNc O.O l0 3.0

Tx~ws River

RNER

8040006

MARSHALL

5-P3

SPS

33

33125/2002

CAH FC PCR SCR

Cleks River 13.2 l0 20.8

T

s River

RNER

BW0008

McCRACi~N

5 -NS

S~PS

33

33f25120D2 -2/288007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Clerks River 28.7 to

30.T

Taws RM~r

RIVER

8W0006

MARSHALL

2-FS

33

,__

33

3/Z52002

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Cl~rfu River 31.7 W 31.8

Tem~u~s River

RIVER

8040008

MARSHALL

2 -FS

33

3S

325IZ002

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Clrks River 12.8 W 48.8

Tee River

RNER

QW0008

MARSHALL

2-FS

33

_3

3325/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Clarks Rlv~r S.0 to 13.2

T~rx~wwa River

RIVER

8040008

McCRACKEN

5-P3

33

33

3125/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cluks River 50.910 55.6

T~nna~ River

~etR-

_.__.

RIVER

_ _

RNER

~~ RNER

8040006

GALLOWAY

5-PS

bNS

32-FS

35122002

WAH FC PCR SCR

ClarkiRiwr 55.6 to84J _

___,___._

_Clrka Wv~r 34.8 to X2.8

T~w~

iv~r

__ 8040006

_8W0008

6040008

.. 8040008

8040008

GALLOWAY

_28~5~__

5-PS

5-PS

SNS

3__

2 -FS

35/212002-102/2007

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

Ts~ssN River

_MARSHALL

33

33

312212006

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Cl.rw Rfv.r84.7 ro8

6.e

~~

~~ T.rrune. Ri

v.r

GALLOWAY

S~PS

38

37H120o7

WIW FC PCR SCR

C

Cnsk 0.75 to 3.3

T~uw Rfwr

, . __RIVER

..RNER

RIVER

_ , GALLOWAY _

,GALLOWAY

. ,..,

5-PS

5 -PS

33

._ _ _

_ 3

, _ _.

3 37!1!2007

5@12002 -141012008

WAH fC PC SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

,_ _.__, _ _ _,, __

C

Cn~k 3.3 to

7.7

T

River

SNS

33

~Cl~r Croak 0.7 to 3.1 ~

~ T~s~s Ri

ver

8040005

MARSHALL

5-P&

33

33

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Croslc 0.1 to 8

.3T~rx~utee River

RIVER

8W0006

MARSHALL

5-NS

2-FS

33

3?127fZ007

WAH FC PC SCR

C u Creek 8.3 to

7.7

Tsrx»s~ Rlwr

RIVER

8040008

MARSHALL

5-NS

33

33

WAH F

a 1 N V

305(

b) Asaesement Results, 2D08

AAARSHALL

GALLOWAY

A AARSHALL

GALLOWAY

GALLOWAY

GALLOWAY

5-NS

28(5)

2-FS

2-FS

35-PS

2-FS

35-NS

5-PS

35B-PS

3

3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3

2/272002

SR/2002 -10J702006

5/2x2002

1/12007

5/Y12002

2/2e12008

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

CAH FC PCR SCR

CAH FC PCR SCR

CAH FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

C

~ CnNc 7.7 l0 9.

7D~ngn Cn~k 0.0 to 7.

8 ___ _ _

Duncan Crs~k 0.0 to

2.5

_ ___

Eut Fork W Cl~rfa Rivx OA l0 27__ ___ _

Eut Fork d Cluks River 8.7 l0 7.

1F

Bench OA to 2.2 _

_ __

T~rw~uN Rlvsr

T~~sN RIVE

T~rxws~ River

Terx»uw River

T~rxws~ Rfv~r

T~r~uu~s Rfwr

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

RNER ~

~ RNER

~ RNER

8040008

EW0008

BW0006

BW0008

8W0006

8040008

Gri

ndrl

ona Creek 0.2 to 2.3 ____ __

T~ss~s Riva

RNER

8040005

GALLOWAY

~~NINGSTON

33

3 3~

3

310

/10/

2008

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Gu~a~ C~k 0.0 to 2.6

_ _ __

_ _

___

T~rrin~ Riveri

RIVER

8040008

GRAVES

5-P3

S-PS

3 33

~ 3

3 3512/2002

WAH FC, PCR SCR

HaNall Burch 1.2 to 4.5

__

__T~rxwsu~ River

RNER

~~8040008

1H/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Homin Br

arx~

h 2.3 to 3.8

T~rxNi~ Rlv~r

RNER

80102D1

CRAVES~ 2-FS

33

33

212E

I200

7WAH, FC PCR, SCR

I ur~d Creak OA to 5.6

T~rxwuss Rivx

RNER

8040008

McCRACKEN

5-PS

5-NS

33

35/2f2002

WAH FC, PCR SCR

INand Cnslc 5.6 to 10.3

Terx~use River

RIVER

8W0008

McCRACKEN

S~PS

33

33

4/1H998

WAH FC PCR SCR

JonNh~n Croak 10.

9 to 19.3

Terx~~Ne Riva

RNER

8040005

GALLOWAY

63

33

351'1@002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Jo~Nh~n Cn~k 7.4

to 10

.9Terx~s~s River

RNER

8010005

GALLOWAY

S~P$

33

33

2128@007

WAH FC PCR SCR

K~r%uek LMc~

Txmesws Rlwr

RESERVOIR

8040005

GALLOWAY

1 -FS

1-FS

1-FS

1•FS

1-FS

11128@008

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Lsdb

elt~

r Cr~Nc 2.910 5.5

Terc~s~as Rives

RNER

6W0005

MARSHALL

2-FS

33

33

512/2002

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Litlh C u Cn~k 3.4 to 8,0

Terr»~ss~ RiWf

RIVER

6W0008

MARSHALL

S~N8

33

33

5/2/2002

CAH FC PCR, SCR

LittN C u Creak 0.0 to 3.4

T~nr»u~s River

RIVER

9W0008

MARSHALL

5-NS

5-PS

33

35/Z/2002

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Little JonNhan Cn~k 0.0 to 3.0

Tenn~s~a River

RIVER

BW00p5

GALLOWAY

2-FS

33

3

~3

512/1002

CAH, FC PCR, SCR

Llttls Hlhk~ Oak Croak

0.0 to 2.4

Tee River

RNER

8W0008

MARSHALL

5B-P$

58-pS

33

33/2?12008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Martin Creek 0.0 to 0.0

Tsrx~s~ River

_RIVER

8040006

MARSHALL

58-p8

SB-pS

33

35R/2002

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

Middy Folk Cn~k 0.2 b BA

T~~~ Rlwr

_ RNER

8040008

MARSHALL

5-P8

5-NS

33

35?J2002

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

Middy FakW Cirks River 2.7

to 4.D

_T~rxNUN Wwr

__

RIVER

BW0008

GALLOWAY

5-P8

33

33

3/'2/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

MIddN Fork d Cl~r1u RW~r 0.0 to 2.

7Terx~uN River

RIVER

6040008

GALLOWAY

SPS

5-NS

33

351

2!20

02 - t/1f2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

PantMr Creek O

.O l0 3.0

T~nr»aNs River

RIVER

8040005

GRAVES

2-FS

S-NS

33

310H02008

WAH FC PCR SCR

P~rNMr Cnslt O.O to 5.2

T~we River

RNER

BW0005

GALLOWAY

2-F8

33

33

3!12!2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Panlh~r CnNc 3.0 to 4.

2T~uw Rlvx

RNER

BW0008

GRAVES

2-FS

33

33

8282001

WAH FC PCR SCR

P

Brands O.Oto2.9

T~nnns~eRlv~r

RIVER

8W0008

GRAVES

2-FS

33

33

628/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

RNv~s &inch 0.0 to

0.3

Tarxw~sN River

RNER

8040008

MARSHALL

5-PS

33

33

5122002.

WAH FC CR SCR

Radchou~e CnNc 0.0 to 4.8

Tenr»s~ River

RIVER

BW0008

GALLOWAY

2-FS

33

33

3I21f2008

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Sol

dl~r

Creek 0.0 to 5.7

Terxiasss River

RIVER

BW0008

MARSHALL

2-FS

33

33

70HO12008

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

Crs~k 0.0 to 2.0

T~rx~wsN Rivx

RNER

6040006

GRAVES

5-PS

33

33 3

3/152007

3H6/2007

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

WAH,fC,PCR,SCR

_

. _

_ _

S

Cro~k3.8to5.4

T~uNRfv~r

__

_RNER

8040008

_GRAVES

~ 5-NS

33

_

_ _

3__________.__.__

Cn~k OA to 3.9

Terx~wea Rivx

__

- _

RNER---

---

8040008--

80400D5

- ~

-

- GRAVES

GALLOWAY

. _2 -FS-

• -

2 -F$

~- -

_.. ;2FS_

~C-PS

~ _ 2-F$

~3

~- 3 3-

•-3 3

~_ 3

58-NS

9_

_.-

-- --- 3

- -

.. __ 3_

_. _ _.

3 ~ _

~

2-FS _.

__ _

_.

3~~~

~ 3 ~

3

3 3 3 _3

WAH, FC PCR SCR

--.

- ---.-

--

S

CrsNc 2.0 to 5,5

Tenn~use Rivx

- Tannauss Rlver_

_-_

--._

__ RNER

__

RNER - •---

_ _

RIVER

_

_ RNER _

_RIVER

RNER

_ 3 _

. 3 3 3 .

3

~_612ER000 _---

_.___3!15/2007 ___.

_ _

14/3/2001 _.__

3 f20@008

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

_ _ __..___ _

T~tw~ River 12.0 to 21.

8 - •----.--•_ ---- -

T~~w River 21.

8 to 23.1

.,

_. - 80A0008

_

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

Tennes~se River

6040006

_8040006_

6W000B

_MARSHALL

_.AAARSHAI.L

_ McCRACKEN

A AeCRACKEN

_ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

_.___ _~_.__

T~aNs River 4.8 to 1D

.5TerMease River

3 3

_302012007

_.

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

_.__ .. ~.___`_, ___

T~rrwt~ River 1.5

to 4.1

Terxhaae R vx

3h8/2007

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

Tncs CtMk 1

.1 to 5.9

Terx~s~s Rlvir ~

8040006

GRAVES

2-FS'

33

33H812~07

WAH FC PCR SCR

TuAt~ Cn~k 1.8

to 3.9

Tsrx~Ns Rfvsr

RJR

8W0005

TRIGG

2-FS

33

33

5/7/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Turks CrNk 0.0 to 3.4

TsrxN~s~s'Rivx

RIVER

6040008

GRAVES

SPS

33

33

1/7/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to CMaMut CrMk 0.0 to 0.7

Terx~saN River

RNER

BW0008

NWRSHALL

58-PS

58-PS

33

35122002

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Clerks Rivx 0.0 to 3.3

Tmxwu~s Rfv~r

RNER

8040008

GALLOWAY

5-NS

33

33

3122!2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Old B~w~r Dan S

h OA to 0.5

Tsrx»at~a River

RNER

8040008

AAARSHALL

&NS

33

33

5/2/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Stics Cn~k 0.0 to 0.

4Ter~~s~s Rivu

RNER

8010006

MARSHALL

35813

33

33H 5!2007

WAH FC PC SCR

UT to 3

Cn~k 0.0 to 3.0

T~mu~ River

RNER

8040005

GALLOWAY

2-FS

33

33

WAH FC PC SCR

UT to UT to PrNMr CnNc O.O !01.7

T~s~s River

RIVER

8040006

GRAVES

2-FS

33

33

WAH fC PCR, SCR

UT to UT fo T

Rfwr

Lake 0.1510 0.8

Taws River

RNER

6040005

GALLOWAY

5-NS

33

33

3/2?12008

WAH FC PCR SCR

WW~aCrMk0.0lo4.0

T~nn~s~River

RIVER

8040008

MARSHALL

2-FS

33

33

5/22002

WAH,FC PCR SCR DWS

W~at Fork d Clarks River OA !010.4

TerxNaws River

_RNER

80400D8

hkCRACKEN

5 -NS

5~N8

33

3_

3/7 8120 07

WAH FC PCR SCR

WNt Fork d Clrks River 1

3.1 to 17.2

TerxNu~s River

RNER

8W0008

GRAVES

2-FS

SNS

33

3S/M2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

West Fork d Clrk~ River 17.2 to 20.0

Tenn~u~s River

RNER

BWD008

MARSHALL

2-FS

33

33

3f212006

WAH FC PCR SCR

YV~at For1c W CIrW River 20.1 !028.4

T~nnuMs River

RIVER

BW0008

MARSHALL

2-FS

5-PS

35-PS

310NOf2008

WAH FC PCR, SCR

W„t Fak of Cl~rkt River 31.

210 38

.2TemN~ River

RNER

BW0008

GALLOWAY

28(5

13

33

33178@007

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

WeN Fork d Cluk~ Rfv~r RNkt Ch~xisl OA t

o 13

.8Terwh~sw Rivx

RNER

8040008

GRAVES

2-FS

33

33

7H 1/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Weft Fork of Clrks RNrx RNkt Clum~l 79.7 fo 22.7

Tsrr»uw River

RNER

8040008

MARSHALL

2-FS

33

5-PS

31I

3f20

02WAH FC PCR, SCR

Wfidat Cn~k 1.310 6.8

Tenrnu~a Rfvar

RIVER

800005

GALLOWAY

2-FS

33

33

10110I20D8

WAH FC, PCR SCR

BI

Desch OA to 2.7

Tnd~wN~r

RIVER

5140205

WEBSTER

SNS

33

33

3/1f2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Brooks Crnk 0.0 to 4.9

Trad~w~ter

RIVER

51+0205

HOPKINS

2-FS

33

33

3H/2003

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Buffalo Creak O

.O l0 8.

8Tradewater

RNER

5740205

HOPKINS

SPS

33

33

3/12003

WAN FC PCR SCR

N

305(b) Ae

ml Results, 2008

Bull C

rsNc 0.0101.0

_Crrw Run 0.0 to 4.0

C

Creek 0.0 W 3.3

C

Cn~k O.Oto8.2

C

Fork 3.4 to 7.8

C

Cnalc 0.0 to 2.1

CINr Creek O

.O to 7.5

Cl~r CnNt 79.4 to 28.2

CIS Croak 26.2 to 26.5

Trad~wd~r

TrWewN~r

Tnd~w~Ut

Trad~w~t~r

Tndrw~hr

Tndwv~br

Tf~d~W~tK

Tnd~wN~r

Tnd~w~br

Sc9.yn4C

-5-PS

4A -NS

5 -NS

SNS

b -PS

5-PS

5 -NS

5-PS

3

3~A-NS

35-NS

3 32-FS

35-NS

3M4-NS

35-NS

3 32 -FS

3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3HI2003

Mt/1998

3!1/2003

1W7/Z007

3118003

3 !12003

1Hef1008

3H/2003

4HN99B

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR,SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

RNER

RNER

RNER

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

RNER

RNER

RIVER

5740205

510205

51A0205

510205

51 0205

51102D5

5110205

5140205

5140205

WEBSTER

HOPKINS

CALDWELL

HOPItlN3

WEBSTER

CHRISTIAN

HOPKINS

HOPKINS

HOPKINS

Crssk 0.0 to

2.7

Tr~dew~hr

RNER

5140205

HOPKINS

5-NS

5 -NS

5-NS

33

10112007

WAH FC PCR 3CR

C

Creek O.Olo3.8

Tndew~Nr

RNER

51 0205

HOPKINS

5-NS

4A-NS4A -NS

33

10HI2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cnb

o►dw

td C

nsk

Incl

udi

V hn

Ditc

h 0.

0 to

14.

7Tn

dew

der

RIV

ER51

0205

WEB

STER

2-FS

5-NS

2 -FS

33

1/7/

2008

-1H

7/20

08W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRCn

bw

ciw

d C

nNt 1

9.21

0 21

.5Tr

edew

~ter

RIV

ER

~57

1020

5YV

EBST

ER5 -

PS3

33

33H

f200

3W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRDa

Mld

son

CrsN

c 0.

0 to

14.

2 _

Tnd~

w~t

aR

IVER

5102

05H

OPK

INS

2-FS

SN

SS

PS

33

1N82

008

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

RE u

t For

k of

FI

Fork

2.7

to 4

.8Tr

ad~w

~t~r

RIV

ER57

0205

CAL

DW

EIL

2 -FS

33

33

11/1

2!20

02W

AH, F

C P

CR S

CREu

t For1

c d H

urtic

arn

Cre

ak 0

.0 to

2.2

Tndw

v~br

RIV

ER51

1020

5HO

PKIN

S5-

NS3

33

310

1720

07W

AH, F

C P

CR S

CRFo

x R

un 0

.0 to

1.1

Trad

ew~t

xR

IVER

5102

05H

OPK

INS

5-NS

5 -N

S5-

NS

33

10/1

1200

7W

AH F

C P

CR

SCR

DW

SHo

ods

Cn~

k O.

O to

7.2

Trad

ewat

xRI

VER

5140

205

CR

ITTE

ND

EN2-

FS3

33

311

H2/

2002

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

Hurrk

:ans

Cro

sk O

.Oto

1,8

Trad

~w~t

xR

NE

R51

0205

H P

KIN

S5-

NS

5 -NS

SN

S3

31/

11!2

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LduB

uh~

~r

TrW

~w~t

xRE

SERV

OIR

5102

05C

ALD

WEL

L2-

FS3

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

11/1

4/20

08-1

128/

2008

W/1

H FC

PCR

SCR

Like

Pse

wss

Trad

~wet

xRE

SERV

OIR

51 0

205

HO

PKIN

S2-

FS3

2-FS

32B

571

HM

2008

WAH

FC

PC

R S

CR D

WS

Lrnb

s C

roak

OA

to 3

.3Tr

adew

~hr

RN

ER

5140

205

HO

PKIN

SS~

PS3

33

331

1!20

03W

AH F

C P

CR 3

CR

Lids

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

11.

9Tr

ad~w

atx

RN

ER

5110

205

_ H

OPK

INS

5 -N

S3

33

33N

f200

3W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRLo

chTr

adew

etx

~ RE

SERV

OIR

5140

205

HO

PKIN

S2-

FS3

2-FS

32-

FS77

H412

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

L Fo

rk O

.O l0

2.4

Tnde

wat

xR

NE

RR

E SER

VOIR

5140

205

WEB

STER

UN

ION

5-PS

3_ _

33

33

3H2O

03W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRM

oRit L

Ma

_ _

._

__

,__

__

Trad

ewdx

5140

205

2-FS

2-FS

3~ ~

3~

3

311

l1~I

20o6

WAH

FC

PCR

, SCR

Mon

t C

n~k

0.0

to 7

.3Tr

~d~w

~ter

___

RN

ER

___

RIV

ER

~ R

ESER

VOIR

_51

4020

5_

CALD

WEL

L2-

FS3 ~ 3

33

~ 3H

2O03

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

Ow

ern

Cra

ck 1

.7 to

2.3

Tnde

wat

sr51

4020

5W

EBST

ERSB

-N3

33 3 3

~3

1H 11

2009

11l7

M20

08W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRW

AFI F

C P

CR S

CR

P~rx~

N

Wt~

~Tr

adew

~tsr

5140

205

~ 51A

0205

CHRI

STUW

2-FS

~ ~~5

-PS

~ 3 3

2-FS

3 ~

~ 3

~ ~

3 ~~

P C

reek

O.O

to3.

9 ~

Trad

~w~l

xR

IVER

CR

RTE

ND

EN~

33/

1x20

03W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRP

CrN

k 17

.7 to

25.

4Tr

Wew

~tx

RIV

ER

~51

0205

CR

IITEN

DEN

2-FS

~

33

11H2

@00

2W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRPi

ro C

neic

x.5

1070

.2

~Tn

dew

~ter

RIV

ER51

020

5C

ALD

WEL

L2 -

FS3

33

377

N2@

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

P C

reN

c0.O

M4.

9Tr

W~w

atx

RN

ER

5110

205

HO

PKIN

S2 -

FS3

33

33H

/100

3W

AH F

C P

CR

SCR

Pond

Cro

Mc

0.0

to 5

.5Tr

adew

ner

~ R

NE

R51

4020

5H

OPK

INS

5 -PS

33

33

3H/2

003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Prov

iden

ce C

R

wrv

okTr

W~w

atx

RESE

RVO

IR51

4020

.5W

EBST

ER2-

FS3

2-FS

32 -

FS1H

I200

2 - 7

2812

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

RNic

t Ch

wis

l d C

s

Cn~

k 0.

510

3.3

Tnde

w~t

erR

NE

R51

A020

5U

NIO

N2-

FSS~

AtS

S~PS

33

1!18

!200

8W

AH F

C P

C

SCR

DW

SRI

ch1~

rW C

ask

0.0

W 4

.5Tn

dew

atK

RN

ER

5740

205

NO

PKIN

S5 -

NS

33

33

3H/2

003

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

Sand

lidc C

nelc

4.5

to 8

.6T

nd~w

Nx

RIV

ER51

4020

5CH

RIST

UW2-

FS3

33

31/

1820

08W

AH, F

C P

CR S

CRCr

wlc

0.0

to 5

.3Tr

Wew

atx

RN

ER

5710

205

HOPK

INS

4A-N

S4M

NS

,PrM

33

33/

1200

3W

AH F

C P

CR 3

CR

Tna

Br~

h 2.

~ to

2.B

TrW

~w~t

arR

IVER

5710

205

HO

PKIN

S58

-NS

33

33

1/18

x200

9W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRTn

dew

~l~r

Riv

er 0

.0 to

18.

8Tn

d~w

~br

RIV

ER51

4020

5U

NIO

N2-

FSS

NS

33

33@

7120

03W

AH F

C P

CR, S

CRTr

ad~w

N~r

Riv

er 1

22.9

to 1

33.9

Tndw

wt~

rR

IVER

51~0

2Q5

CHRI

STUW

2-F3

33

33

M1N

9BE

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

RTn

d~w

N~r

Riw

r 20

.81o

Ae.4

Tr~d

~w~M

rR

IVER

5702

05W

EBST

ER5 -

NS

S~NS

5~N3

32-

FS7 /

1 812

0 0 8

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Tred

~w~l

~r R

ivsr

83.

1 to

79.

4Tn

d~w

M~r

RIV

ER51

4020

5H

OPK

INS

5 -PS

2-FS

33

33!

1120

03W

AH F

C P

CR 3

CR

Tnde

wM

~r R

ivw

98.

7 ►0

98.

5T

rW~

w~

rR

NE

R51

0205

HO

PKIN

S2-

FS3

33

31/

16!2

008

WAH

FC

, PCR

, SCR

Trad

ww

tw R

ivr 9

8.5

to 1

11.1

TrW

~wM

~rR

IVER

5140

205

CHRI

STUW

SP

S2-

FS2-

F33

31N

8I20

09W

AH F

C, P

CR, S

CRT

ion

Bra

nch

O.O

l0 2

.5Tn

dew

N~r

RN

ER

51 0

205

CALD

YVEL

L5-

NS

33

33

3Hf2

003

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT

to C

iw C

rs~k

0.0

l0 2

.2Tt

ad~w

MK

RIV

ER51

0205

HO

PKIN

SSB

-NS

58-N

S3

33

1H 1/

2008

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

RU

T to

C

rwk'

O.O

to1.

1Tr

W~w

M~t

RIV

ER51

0205

HO

PKIN

S5-

NS3

33

370

17/Z

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT

to

~ C

reek

0.0

fo 0

.9Tr

ad~i

wtlK

RIV

ER51

020

5HO

PKIN

S5-

NS

5-N

S5-

NS

33

1/t 1

!200

8W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRU

T to

Cra

borc

hrd

Cree

k 0.0

to 1

.7Tr

ad~~

xM~r

RIV

ER51

020

5W

EBST

ERSB

-NS

5B-N

S3

33

1111

2008

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

RUT

to D

on~l

dw~

C~

Ic 0

.0 to

1.B

Tra

d~w

~rR

IVER

5140

205

CALD

INEL

L5-

PS3

33

37H

1/20

08W

AH F

C, P

CR S

CRU

T to

Hur

tkar

M C

n~k

OA

ro 0

.2Tn

d~w

~br

RN

ER

b740

205

HO

PKIN

S5 -

NS

5-N

S5 -

NS

33

1H 1R

OOe

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT

W l

Fork

1.2

ro 2

.6T

r~w

N~

rR

IVER

5102

05W

EBST

ERSB

-NS

SB-N

S3

33

1H 12

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT

to P

C

rNk

0.0

to 2

.9Tr

ad~w

~t~r

RIV

ER51

4020

5C

ALD

WEL

L2-

FS3

33

31/

18!2

008

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

R D

WS

UT

W 3

andl

idc

CnN

c 0.

0 to

1.4

Trad

awN

~R

IVER

5702

05CH

RIST

UW2-

FS3

33

311

H2l

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

UT to

31o

wr C

naic

O.O

!01.

5 ~

~

~T

nd~w

Na

RIV

ER51

020

5W

EBST

ERS

PS

3SB

3 3

3 3 3 3 ~

3 3~

3 3 . ~

_._

31H

9f20

0BW

AH F

C, P

CR S

CR3

_ 3

_1N

1@00

8 _

_ 1M

8120

08

__

__W

AH F

C P

CR S

CR51

1020

5U

NIO

N3

SPS

UT to

UT

to C

C

n~lt

0 .0 b

0.1

Tndr

w~t

~rR

IVER

_ _

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

51 0

205

WEB

STER

Tnd~

wN

~rR

IVER

UT to

UT

to $

love

r CrN

k 0.

0 b 1.

2U

T to

UT

to S

bvsr

Cro

Nc 0

.210

1.5

Tnd~

w~M

r~

RIV

ER ~

5140

205

WEB

STER

SN

S3

~~

3N

I200

3W

AH, F

C, P

CR S

CR

_U

T to

UT

to S

lovx

Cra

ck 0

.0 to

1.7

Tnd~

wN

KR

IVER

~51

020

5W

EBST

ER58

-NS

SB-N

S3

33

1/77

/2 0

9W

AH F

C P

CR S

CR

a N ~D

305(b) Assessment Result, 2008

a W O

.5140205

UT to UT to TrW~w~tsr Rivx 0.0 W 0.55

Wwd CrNk 4.9 to

10.3

Woks Croak 0.0 ro

4.9

TrW~w~ter

Tnd~w~tar

TrWrw~ter

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

510205

5110205

HOPKINS

CALDINELL

HOPKINS

58-NS

5-NS

5-NS

58-NS

3 3

3 3 3

3 a 3

3 3 3

1N812008

~~2ao3

3/1/2003

WAM FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WMlaid~ CnNc 7.9 to 2.85

WoH CnNi 0.0 to 1.0

TrW~w~ter

Tnd~w~ter

RNER

RIVER

514020.5

5740205

HOPKINS

CRITTENDEN

SB-NS

S~NS

3 33 3

3 33 3

1H 712008

3NI2003

WAH FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Becks Bench O

.O l0 0.9

__

T

CENk

RNER

~ X103

GREENUP

5~P3

33

33

11/12/2003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Brush Croak 0.0 to 3.9

TyprU Creak

~~ RNER

5090103

GREENUP

~2 -FS

33

33

7!2/20W

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Buff~b Croak 0.0 ro

8.3

_. __

T

s CiNk

_RNER

__5090103

CARTER

2-FS

2-F$

3~

33

1H420W

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bufhb Crs~k 8.3 to

9.8

_ _ _^..___

Typarl~ Cnsk

RNER

._ RNER

RNER

5080103

CARTER

2-FS

33

~ 3

3 311/25J2003

11/1212003

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

J~oobt Fork 3.910 5.7

___.

T

CrNk

T

s Creek

5090103

~ 5090103

CARTER

5-P$

33

3 3

L~alh~rwood Brrrh 0.0 to

4.3 ____ ~

GREENUP

2.FS

33

31/212004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Mealons Fork 0.0 ro

2.5

Typ~rts CrNk

RNER

5090103

CARTER

2-FS

33

33

1f24f2004

WAH, FC PCR SCR

SctwNz Cn~k 1.3 l0 4

.7T

s Cndc

RIVER

5090109

GREENUP

2-F$

33

33

17H 1/2003

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Schultz Creek 4.7 to 10.8

T

Creek

R R

5090103

GREENUP

bP$

33

33

7J9/2004

WAH FC PCR SCR

Smith Cn»k 2.0 w 4.3

T

s Cnsk

RIVER

5090103

CARTER

5-P$

33

33

11N 12003

WAH fC PCR SCR

Smok VN Wu

T orb Cn~k

RESERVOIR

5080103

CARTER

2-F$

33

33

3/512003

WAH FC PCR SCR

Smelt Crs~k 1.4 to 3.0

T

arts CENk

RNER

50J0103

CARTER

33

33

3WAH FC PCR 3CR

Soldier Fork 0.0 to 2.0

T

Creek

RNER

5090103

CARTER

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Thrss P

Breech 0.0 to

5.8

T

CnNt

RNER

5090103

CARTER

2-F$

33

33

1f21f2004

WAH, FC PCR SCR

T

C

1.5 to 8.1

T

CrNk

RNER

~ D0103

CARTER

5-P3

33

33

71!112003

WAH, FC PCR SCR

T

~ Creek 0.0 to X5.7

T

Cn~k

RIVER

5090103

CaREENUP

2-F$

2 5

35-NS

31@0@004

WAH FC PCR SCR

T

Cn~k 51.0 t0 57.8

T

s CnNc

RNER

5090103

CARTER

2-F8

33

33

11/122003

WAH FC PCR SCR

T

Crwk 65.0 to 88.8

T

GnNc

_._ RNER

5090103

GREENUP

2-F8

2-FS

33

31/18I~004

WAH, fC, PCR, SCR

T

Cn~k 78.0 l0 88.8

T

Crwk

RNER

5080103

CARTER

33

32-FS ~

2-FS

4/9l20W

WAM, FC PCR SCR

Whig Oak Crs~k 0.0 to 1.7

T

s Creek

RIVER

5090103

GREENU

33

33 v

3M7I19Be

WAH FC PCR SCR

AdrrN 8nneh 0.0 to

1.8

U

CumWrfand

RNER

5130107

WHITLEY

2-FS

33

33

4J7H998

WAH, FC. PCR, SCR

Areh~rs Croak 0.0 W 4.4

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130101

WHITLEY

2-FS

33

33

M7N990

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bid Brrxh 0.0 to 3.0

U

Curnb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

LETCHER

2-FS

33

33

7/31/2001

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Bas

CrsNc 0.0102.6

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130101

HARL.AN

34MN8

33

3M1N99B

WAH FC PCR SCR

B~Ac C

Cn~k 0.1 to 3.8

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

5730101

WHRLEY

S~PS

33

33

11/8/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bar Cn~k 0.0 to

2.8

U

Cwnb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130103

CUMBERLAND

2-FS

33

33

1/28/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bur Crs~k 0.0 to 3.3

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RNER

5130104

McGREARY

5-NS

5-NS

5-NS

2-FS

34/1I199B

WAH FC PER SCR

Bw CreNt O.O to 2.7

U

Cwnberland

fiNER

6W0005

PULASKI

33

33

3WAH FC, PCR, SCR

B~~vsr Creek

1 A to 7.0

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130703

McCREARY

2 -FS

33

33

7!31/2007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

B~~wr Crs~k 1

8.8 to 34.5

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130703

WAYNE

5-PS

33

~3

3727/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bwv~r C~k 78.2 to 18.8

U

Cumberland

RNER

5730103

WAYNE

5-PS

33

33

11/BR006

WAH FC PCR SCR

Backs Crask O.O la ~.0

U

Cumberland

RIVER

---- 'RNER

RIVER

_ __

RNER

RIVER

5130101

WHRLEY

5-PS

5-PS

5-P3

3- 3 -- -~

T~ 3 _

3 3 3 ~

~-

~ ---- 3 --

---

3

3M1H99B

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

BwlickCrwk O.Olo5.7---

-- --------

Ut~rCumberiand

5130103

5130103

PULASKI

2-FS

~~ 5-PS

5-P3

5-PS

8-3 3 3 3

• 3

33

- ---9N92000

WAH FC, PCR SCR DWS

BNLick Crs~k 7.5 to

10.9

U

Cumb~rtand

_.LINCOLN _

BELL

~ 3 3 ~3 3

- 8 -

3 3 3

_ 3122/2008 ~

1 fZ812007 ~

1!3112007 ~

~

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

B~rx~tta Fork d Y~Ibw Cn~k B

0.0 to 3.2

Upper Curnb~rland

5130107

5730101

~ WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Bern Fork O.O to 2.2

B' Br~neh 0.4 to 2.0

U

CumWrlrnd

BELL

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Upper Cutnbal~ nd

R(VER

RNER

5130101

McCREARY .

2-FS

.. 2-FS -

3M7/198E

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

B' CI' CnNc 1.1 b~_8

- -- -~- -- -

U

Cumbsrlxid

5730703

PULASKI

- 3 3

7f28/2007

W/W FC PCR SCR

B

CI'

Cn~kO.Olo 1.7 ~

U

CunbKleW

RIVER

5130103

PULASKI

2-F$

33

1f2812007

WAH FC PCR, SCR

8' Indian Creek

O.O l0 5.8

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130701

KNOX

SNS

33

__

33

9/212000

WAH FC PCR SCR

B' Lids &inch 1

.1 to 2.8

U

r Gland

RIVER

5130103

PULASKI

2-F8

33

33

72J10ft007

WAH FC PCR SCR

B'

CnNt O.O l0 5.0

U

CumbMand

RNER

5130703

RUSSELL

2-FS

33

2-FS

31/312002

WAH FC PCR SCR

B Rewx Cnslc 0.0 to 5.8

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130703

CUMBERLAND

5-PS

33

33

7110/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

B

Wilier Cn~k 0.0 to

~.0

U

Cumbsrlmd

RNER

5130103

CUMBERLAND

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Bills Bmdi 2.

~ to 3.7

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130102

JACKSON

33

33

2-FS

WAH FC PCR SCR

8ladcxwk~ &inch 0.0 to

2.1

U

Cumbert~nd

RIVER

5130107

BELL

2 -FS

33

33

12!!/2001

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Blake Fork 0.0 to 4.8

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130701

WHITLEY

2-F8

33

33

112E12007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bond Burch 0.5 to

1.8

U

Cun~!»rland

RIVER

5130101

HARLAN

SN8

2 -FS

5-PS

2-FS ~

~

6-N8

5-N8

33

11/308008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bn~d~ns CnNc 0.0 to

2.6

U

Cumberland

RIVER

~ 5730101

MARLAN

33

33

12H02007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bri

Chek 0.0 to 4.1

Upper Curt~l~n d

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

33

83

9/1912000

WAM, FC PCR SCR

Brio~a Cn~k 0.0 to

3.2

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130101

KNOX

33

33

12H02001

WAH FC PCR SCR

&ownNs Creek B

.9 to 18.7

U

CWr~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

BELL

2-FS

33

33

1/28f2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Brush CnsFc 0.0 to 3.5

U

Cumberland

RIVER

~5130107

KNOX

5 -NS

33

33

12182000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bnah Croak 1

.1 to 7.5

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RNER

5130702

ROCKCASTLE

34A-NS

33

.3

1/12001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Creek 0.0 to B.0

U

Cunb~rland

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

2-FS

33

33

10H0@008

WAH FC PCR SCR

BuckCrs~k 11.71032.3

U

C~xnb~rlrx!

RIVER

5130103

PULASKI

2-FS

2-FS

2 -FS

33

1W1Q@008

WAH FC PCR SCR

305(b) Aa

,nt Rasulls, 2008

Buck Crack 32.310 40.8

_ _ __

__ __

Water Bodv Tvo~

0-Dlalt HUC

5130103

Counri _

_

_ __ PULASKI

PULASKI

_ .

PULASIC

I ~

~ PULASICI

~Fish Co~sumotlon

ows.

Assas Dab

D~sianat~d Uses

U

r Cumberletd

__ __RIVER _

_

2-F$

_. T-F3.._

._ _2FS __

~2 -FS

3 3 3 3

3 g - ~

3

~- -

3

3-

- -- . 3 _

. __

~ 3

~-- ~. 5-PS

-

_

3 3

__3/258002

.- --3125/2002 ---

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

Buds Crs~k 40.8 l0 45.2

---.------

U

Cumberland

. - -- --RNER ..

. _ .

RNER

- -

-RIVER

- ---

~ RNER ~

5130103

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buds Cnslc X5.2 to 45.6

__ ___

U

Curnberl~nd

r Curtibxlend

U

r CumWrl~nd

..51 30103

~ - 5130103

~ 3 370N0l2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buds CnNt X5.8 to 53.0

-- ----------

3122/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buds Cn~k 53.0 to SB.B

5130103

~LINCOLN

2-FS

33

33

3@512D02

WAH FC PCR SCR

Buds Crs~k 0.4 to 2.8

_r Cuiribsrl~nd

RNER

5130101

VNi1TLEY

2-FS

33

33

12H0/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Budts &~neh O.O l0 2.5

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130101

WHITLEY

2-F8

2-FS

2-F8

33

M7/79BB

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Buffab Creek 2.610 3.9

U

CumberlrW

RNER

5130701

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

1Nf2001

WAH, FC PCR 8CR

Bull Run 0.0 to

3.7

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130701

KNOX

SP$

33

33

3/232008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Bund~s Creek 0.0 to 3.3

C~xnb~A~nd

RNER

5130101

WHITLEY

2-FS

33

33

1W1012008

WAH, FC PCR SCR

CAN Pin Fork 0.0 to 3.8

U

ar Cunbal~nd

RIVER

5130101

YVHfTLEY

2-FS

33

33

10/10/2006

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

&~rxh 0.0 to 2.1

Curt~berl~nd

RIVER

5730107

WHITLEY

2 -FS

33

312/10/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

CaneBnnch O.Oto2.0

CRNER

5130703

McCREARY

IMNS

4MM8~MNS

33

2/1M2006

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cans Cn~k 0.0 to

1.5

U

Cumbwlr~d

RIVER

5130101

WHITLEY

2-FS

33

33

11H7fZ001

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

Cans Creek 0.0 to 11.9

___

U

Cunb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130102

LAUREL

2 -FS

33

33

8!7012005

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

CarwCn~kO.Oto~.4

U

Cumbertend

RNER

5130101

WHITLEY

5-NS

33

33

3122/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Cans Cn~k O.Oto0.8

U

Cwnberla~d

_

RIVER

_5130701

BELL

2-FS

33

33

12/1012001

WAH, FC PCR 3CR

Carxwn Cn~k O.O!01.8

U

Cwnbarl~nd

_ RIVER _

5130101

BELL

S~PS

33

33

1/28/2007

WAH FC, PCR, SCR

Canon Croak 4.9 to

8.8

U

C~xnb~A~nd

RIVER

5130101

BELL

2-FS

33

__

33

111102001

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Carxwn CrNk Wu

_U

CumGrf~nd

RESERVOIR

5130101

BELL

2-FS

32-FS

32-F8

1H82006

WAH FC PCR, SCR

C

CnNc0.Oro1.3

U

CumbMand

RIVER

5730107

WHITLEY

2-FS

33

33

1/28x2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

C

Fork of M~rtowborN Croak 0.0 ro 2.0

U

Cixnb~rl~nd

RNER

5730703

CUMBERLAND

2-F8

33

33

8/!0@000

WAH FC, PCR SCR

CMron Croak 0.0 to

8.9

U

r C~xnb~Arid

RIVER

5130107

HARLAN

2-F$

M-N8

33

312/8/2000

CAH FC PCR SCR

Cheno~ LNu

U

CurnbKl~nd

RESERVOMt

5130701

BELL

2-FS

34C-P8

32-FS

1232008

CAH FC PCR SCR

CNr Cn~k 3.4 to 7.B

U

C~mb~rlmd

RNER

5130102

ROCKCASTLE

2-F8

33

33

1292007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cigar Cn~k O.B to 3.2

U

Cumbert~nd

RIVER

5130107

BELL

2 -FS

33

33

1f3/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

Cl~v Fork 0.0 to 9.1

U

r Cumberland

RIVER

5130101

1NFIITLEY

2 -FS

2-F$

33

31!31@007

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Cl~u Fak 17.0 to 19.4

__

U

Curnb~ri~nd

_ RNER

5130101

WHfTLEY

5-PS

33

33

7W10rz008

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Cii

Creek 0.0!02.7

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

-- _

RNER

5130703

5130101

-

PULASKI

HARLAN

2 -FS

5-P8

~3

33

3512/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Clover Fork 28.2 ro

28.9

__

_U

Curnberl~nd

4MNS

33

35f212002

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

Clovsr Fork 28.9 to 33B

`---

U

r CumberlvW

__.._.

RIVER

_..-

- RIVER

_ _. _. RIVER.-

- _

-- -

RIVER --

-- 5130101. -

5130101 -

- 5130101

--

-- HARLAN - ..

HARLAN

- -- HARLAN_

-_ _ -• S-NS-

6-NS

_.2-FS ..

.- PS_

4~1-NS

4A-NS

4MN3

4MN3

3 3_ 3 3

_,

__ .

- 3

--.__

3_ -

. 3 -- ~

. ~

__ V 3

__ ,

_3

3_

WAH, FC. PCR, SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

--Cbvsr Fak 9.2 to

15.5 -

-Upper Curt~rl and

..3

-- _512!1002

9!3/2002

Clover Fak O.O to 8.2

---

U

Cumberland

3 _

3_ ~5

I20 02 -1

13112007

B f812007 -- -

-- - WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

_-Clov~rFark15.51o1B.2-

_ _--_-

-_ - -....__..

Cbwr Fork 78.2 to

28.2

__ __ __ _

_ _ __ _~ _

Ctov~rlfck Croak

O.O l0 5.0

U

Cumberland

- 5730101

HARLAN

- WAH FC.PCR, SCR

r Cumberland

RIVER _

5130101

_,_

HARLAN

_5 SNS

4A-NS.3

3M1N998

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

CurM»rluid

RIVER

5130107

MARLAN

5-PS

~MNS

33

33/22/2006

WAH FC PCR, SCR

______ _

Branch

0.7 to 2.0

Cumberland

_RIVER

5130104

AAcCREARY

2-FS

33

33

77H92001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fork 0.O to 7.9

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130101

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

7 W1012008

WAH FC PCR SCR

CoNiBnnch0.01o2.1

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5730107

IWOX

2-FS

33

33

4l1H9B9

WAH FC,PCR SCR

Colliers Croak 0.0 to

1.7

U

Cur~ert~nd

RIVER

5430101

LETCHER

5-PS

33

33

1/3112007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

C

t ForkO.Olo4.23

U

Curtib~riand

RNER

5130104

McCREARY

~A-NS

4A -NS,A-NS

33

2H4f2008

WAH, FC PCR SCR

CorWn C

R~t~rvdr

U

Cumberland

RESERVOIR

5130107

LAUREL

5-PS

33

35 -NS

iH/1000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cnb Ordwd CnNc O.O !01.0

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

2-FS

33

33

512/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn

Crsslcb.8 W 8.8

U

CumWrland

RNER

5130101

LAUREL

5-PS

33

33

129/2007

WAN FC PCR SCR

Cn

Cn~k B.8 to 9.0

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER v

5130101

LAUREL

2-FS

33

33

11/112006

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Cans Crwk 1.410 2.0

U

Ctrr~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

HARLAN

5-PS

33

_ _3

3_

7 1 /3 0120 0 6

WAH FC PCR SCR

Corks Cn~k 7

.8 to 2.4

U

C~xnb~rl~nd

RNER

5130101

HARLAN

5 -PS

33

___

33

11/30/1008

WAH FC PCR SCR

___

prr~ pnNc Wa

U

Cixnbsrland

RESERVOIR__

5130101

HARLAN

28(5)

55

__

___ _ 3 ___ _

.__

33 3

1/1812008

WAH PC PCR SCR

CriadlNs Brruh 0.0 to 1.9

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

_WHITLEY

_ _

2-FS

33

__12H0/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Crate Cn~k 0.0 to 4.8

U

Curt~rl~nd

RNER

5130103

CUMBERLAND

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

33

2/7/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

_Croau Cn~k 1~.0 to 17.15

U

Cun~rl~nd

RIVER

5130103

ADAIR

SPS

33

33

7/7012000

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

Croau Cn~k 4.9 to 1~.0

CurtibKirid

RIVER

5130103

CUMBERLAND

5-PS

5-NS

bN8

33

512@002

WAH CAH FC PCR SCR DWS

CrookW Crs~k 5.71012.2

U

CIr~d

RIVER

5130102

ROCKCA3TLE

2-FS

4A-NS

33

3~l1NBD9

WAH FC PCR SCR

Crooked Creek 0.110 5.7

U

Curt~rUnd

RNER

5130102

ROCKCASTLE

34A-PS

33

33128/2007

WAH FC PC SCR DWS

Cunb~riand Wwr 480.2 to X80.9

U

C~xnb~rhnd

RIVER

5130103

RUSSELL

2-FS

33

33

5/2x1002

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

Cunb~rlandRiver 860.810854.5

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

BELL

34A-NS

33

35/7/2002

WAH fC PCR SCR

Ctrnb~rhnd River 871.910 682.3

U

CunberlrM

RIVER

5130101

HARLAN

SPS

33

33

1 W10R006

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Curtd»rlr~d River 385.5 to 434.4

U

Cur~rl~nd

RIVER

5130103

RUSSELL

2-F3

2-FS

2-FS

32-FS

2!1/2007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Cu~t~nd Rfver X58.8 to X80.2

U

Cunb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130103

RUSSELL

358-PS

33

32x28007

WAH FC, PCR, $CR

Cunb~rlrM River 554.85 to 589.4

U

CurMsAmd

RIVER

5130101

WHRLEY

2-FS

5-PS

32-FS

2-FS

_. 72/11/1008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cumbsrl~nd River 589.4 to 575.1

U

Cunb~rl~nd

'RIVER

513D101

WHITLEY

5 -PS

33

33

9/8/1007

WAH FC PCR SCR

'~ W r

305(b) Aaeeaamenl Re

sult

s, 2008

W N

Cumberland Rivx 5&1.7 to 585.7

C~r

nb~r

l~nd

Rfwr 880.7 to 888.8

Cumbwland Riwr 682.3 to 883.6

U

Cumberland

U

Cumberland

U

Curnbal~nd

RIVER

RIVER

RIVER

5130101

5130101

5130101

WHtTLEY

HARLAN

HARLAN

3SPS3

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

2-FS 3 3

2/2/2007

5 RI2oo2

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

C~x

nber

land

RNx 883.8 to

891.2

U

Curt~rl~nd

RNER

5130101

HARLAN

3~MNS

33

3711/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

DAN Hallow R~Nrvoir

D~Ws &arxh 0.0 to

2.B

U

Cumberland

U

r Cumberland

RESERVOIR

RNER

5130105

5130101

CLINTON

BELL

2 -FS

2 -FS

3 32 -FS 3

2 -FS 3

2 -FS 3

12H8f2008

1 21102001

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

D

Croak O.Olo3.5

SI

Cn~kO.Oto1.2

U

Cumberland

U

Cumbarl~nd

RIVER

RIVER

5130164

5130101

McCREARY

WHfTLEY

2 -FS

2-FS

3 33 3

3 33 3

~M1N99B

1129/2007

WAH FC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Branch

O.O l0 0.

4U

Cumbal~nd

RIVER

5130103

PULASKI

58 -PS

33

33 ~

5IY/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fak 0.0 M 3.0

U

CumWA~nd

~ RNER

5130102

ROCKCASTLE

2-FS

33

33

~811 W2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

E

Cnsk D.0 to

8.7

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130101

McCREARY

2-fS

33

33

1 W10f2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Eul Fork of L

C

Crs~k 0.

0 to 4.5

U

Curnb~rland

RIVER

5130101

KNOX

5~P3 ~

33

33

9I27f2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Elk

CnNt O.O to 7.8

____

U

CumWrlr~d

RNER

b130103

WAYNE

5-NS

33

33

8H6/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

E

CnNc 0.1 to 2

.9U

Cwnbsrl~nd

RIVER

5130701

HARLAN

5-NS

33

33

11/1912001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fortis For1c C

rs~k 0.0 to

1.2

CumWrland

RIVER

5130103

CUMBERLAND

5-N3

33

33

5/212002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ferris Fak Creak 3.0 to B.0

U

Cumb~rlr~d

RIVER

5130103

METCALF

2-FS

33

33

3!22

!200

8WAH FC PCR SCR

Ff

Cnsic 16.0 to

26.4

U

Cumbal~nd

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

2-FS

33

33

1/312002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Foroslsn Creek O.O l0 5.1

U

Curtibarlu~d

RIVER

5130707

HARLAN

2 -FS

33

33

1292007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Fou

r Mik Run 0.7 to

2.7

U

Curnbsrfend

RIVER

5130101

BELL

2-FS

33

33

5/2x2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Farmil~Crs~k 1.7104.8

_U

Cumberland

RNER

5130101

BELL

2-FS

33

33

1218/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

Frxdcs Gask 3.210 4.9

_U

Curt~b~rlxW

RIVER

5130107

LETCHER

2-FS

33

33

11/19f2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

F ift

Crs~k 0.0 to

4.7

__ ___ ____

U

Cumberland

_ RIVER

._5730101

FIARLAN

2-F$

33

33

2/9/

2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Giknon Croak 0.0 w 5.9

U

Cwr~Wrl~nd

RNER

5130103

LIN LN

5 -PS

33

33

5/22002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Goodin Crs~k

2.1 to 2.8

Cina~ Creak O.Oto3.7

.._~_ _~__

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130707

KNOX

5-PS

33

33

5/t/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

U

CumD~rl~nd

_5130107

BELL

~__ 3

~4MPS

33

3 312/8/2000

1 2/1012007

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hak Fork 0.0 to 2.9

CurtibsAxid_

RIVER

,_~,.~.

RNER

_5130101

_KNOX

2-FS

33

. __

3 3Hrri~ Brrwh 0.25 to 0.8 _

_,

U

Cwr~b~rt~nd

_ _

RIVER _

RNER

5130101

HARLAN

5 -PS

33

3 3~17I30@008

WAH FC PCR, 3CR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Harrods Fork 0.0 to 5.3

U

C~xnb~rlmd

5130103

CUMBERLAND

33

33

~HMchNI Bench O

.O !01.0

U

C~xnb~rlmd

RNER

5130701

McCREARY

5-PS

33

33

11!192001

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Hawk Cn~k 0.0 to

8.6

U

Curtibxland

RNER

5130102

LAUREL

2 -FS

33

33

2812007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k 1.310 2.3

Cun~bxf~nd

RNER

5130105

CLINTON

-FS

33

33

5/2/2002

WAH FC PCR, SCR

H~zN Patch Cnsic 0.

0 to 1.8

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130102

LAUREL

5 -PS

33

33

218!

2007

WAH, FC, PCR SCR

H~I

ton Breech O.O!01.0

U

CumGrtand

RNER

5130103

McCREARY

33

33

3WAH FC PCR SCR

Hk*leBrrich O.O!01.8

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RNER

5130101

KNOX

2-FS

33

33

12H020D1

WAH FC PCR SCR

t &~neh 0.0

to 1.8

U

CumbKland

RNER

5130101

KNOX

2-FS

33

33

7Z/1Q2U07

WAH FC PCR SCR

Hone Lids Cn~k 0.0

W 15.2

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130102

JACKSON

2-FS

2 -FS

33

3tOH02006

WAH FC PCR SCR

How~rda Crs~k 0.6 to

4.6

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RNER

5130105

CLINTON

2-FS

33

33

731/2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

H~rrti

Shlrt Branch 0.0

to 2.8

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

KNOX

2 -FS

33

33

12/7012007

WAH FC PCR SCR

IlAvi

ll Crs~k 8.8 to

122

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130105

CLINTON

2-F

33

33

2!1!

2007

WAH, FC PCR SCR

Indi

an Cn~k 0.0 to

4.2

_Cumberland

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

5 -PS

33

33

5fYR002

WAH FC PCR SCR

I ndian Crssk 0.0

to 4.5

U

Cumbarl~nd

RIVER

5730102

JACKSON

5~PS

33

33

4/7/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Indi

an Cro

sfc 2.3 l0 6.

7U

~r Cumberland

RIVER

5130101

McCREARY

2-F$

33

33

1 W1012008

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Jackie Breech 0.0 to 1.7

r Cumb~rlrxf

RIVER

5730107

WHITLEY

2-FS

33

33

11/19!2001

WAH FC PCR SCR

JNIkoCrNk O.Oto6.1

Cumbsrl~nd

RNER

RIVER

5130101

WHITLEY

2-FS

2 -FS

33 ~

~3

701102006

WAH FC PCR SCR

J~Ilko Croeit 22.5 to

25.3

U

Curtib~rland

5130101

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

2!!/2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

J Bnneh 0.0 M 8.0

U

Curnberl~nd

RNER

5130101

McCREARY

5-PS

33

33

511/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

K~rn~d

Crssk 0.0 to 3.0

U

Cumberland

RNER

5130104

WAYNE

2-FS

33

33

12/1 W2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Ketth CnNt 1.75 to 8.

1U

Ctxnb~rlmd

RNER

5130103

MONROE

2 -FS

33

33

7!1812007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Kflbun Fork 0.0 to 0.

9U

Cwnbarland

RIVER

5730101

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

2/2012007

WAH FC PCR SCR

lGlbum Fork 0.9 to 8.2

U

Cumberland

RIVER

5130107

McCREARY

5-PS

33

33

7172007

WAH FC PCR SCR

L~ka Curnb~A~nd

U

Cumberland

RESERVOIR

5130103

RUSSELL

2-FS

32 -FS

5-PS

2-FS

1?J12@008

WAH FC PCR SCR

~y ~~~~N

U

Cumbxl~rW

RESERVOIR

5130102

ROCKCASTLE

2-F3

32-FS

32-

FS1/21!2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

LrxN &~ndi 0.0

to 2.2

U

er Curt~~fend

RNER

5130702

LAUREL

2-FS

33

33

2172007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Lnx~l Cn~ic 0.8 W 3.d5

U

r Cumberland

RNER

~ 5130701

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

7.!8!1007

WAH FC PCR SCR

L~unl CrNk 3.65 W 6.1 i

Curnb~A~nd

RIVER

5130101

McCREARY

5-PS

33

33

WAH FC PCR SCR

~~ ~~ ~

U w C~xnb~rland

RESERVOIR ~

RIVER

5130107

McCREARY

2-FS

~ SB-PS

3 3 3 3

2-F8 3 3 3

3

~3

~3 !

~ 3

2 -FS 3

3!82008

_._._ \NAM FC, PCR, SCR

l.aunl Folk 7.~ l0 9.

1Upper Ct~~rlutd

5730101

McCREARY

2/82007

WAH FC PCR SCR

L.rrN Fork d CN~r Fork 10.3 !013.8

U

Cumberland

RIVER

~RIVER

~5130101

WHITLEY

SN8

2-FS

3~

8!31@000

WAH FC PCR SCR

L~x+l FoAc of CNr Fork 16.9 !0

18.9_

~

~U

Cumb~rlrid

5130101

WHITLEY

35!2!2002

WAH FC aCR SCR

Lrr~l Fak of CMv Fork a.25 to 10.9__ _ ~

U

r Cumb~dand

RIVER

3130101

WHRLEY

2-FS

33

3

_3

12H1/2001

WAH, FC PCR, SCR

LwM Fork d Kilburn Fork OA to 2.3

U

Cumbsrlrid~

RIVER

7 01

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

BH12000

WAH FC PCR SCR

305(b)

m~ntRasulu,2008

~Y

W W

Lwnl Fork W Middy Fork 0.0 to

5.0

~t

3U

Curnberl~nd

RNER

~ RNER

--

RIVER

~~- - -

-. - RIVER---

---._

--

RIVER__

RESERVOIR

- - RIVER --

-RIVER

5130102

5730101

- 513010

1

J ACK~SON~_

LAUREL

~ LAUREL

- - LAUREL --

-- -LAUREL --

WHITLEY

HARLAN

2-fS

33

_

_LwrN Riwr

33.7 W 39.8

__ __ ___

U

Cur~A~nd

U

Curnb~Arid

U~C

umt~rland

310N012008

WAH, FC

, PCR, SCR

5 -P5

---- S-NS- -

5-p$

SNS

~ 2 -FS

._ 2 -

FS _

...

5-NS

33 3 -

-- 3

~ - 3 -

2-FS

_ 3 _

5 -NS

-- --- 3 ----

321812007

WAH FC PCR, SCR

L ~urM Rlwr 0.

9 to 2.2

----. ~- --

- -- -

Lwnl Riwr23.7 W 21.9

-. --- - -

--

--LauM Riwr28.310 33.7

_ _.. - •

------

LwrN River R~rvok

5130701

5130701

_5130101

-5130101

5130101

~

3_•- 3

--2-FS 3 3_

M►-N

§

3---- -

3 -

- -

----- 3

--

-•--

-~ 2

-FS

~3

-3

3 3-

S2 -

FS-3

-•3

11/7

2008

---

1117

/'200

5 --

218/2

007

-- --

1 %1/2

001 -

12/M

2008

~-

-- 2/9

1200 --

--2l2

0f20

07

--

WAH

. FC,

PCR

. SCR

WAH

, FCC

PCR

, SCR

--

U

Cum

b~d~

nd--

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

Cum

b~rlu

MLN

t For

k of F

upkt

CroN

tOA

W 7

.5

- •-

--- -- --

Cum

b~fla

nd6u

rt~rlr

~d-

- W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRW

AFI, F

C, PC

R~ S

CR

-LN

t For

k of

CnN

t 0.0

W 1

3.1

BELL

WAH

FC,

PCR

SCR

L~wf

~ Cre

ek 0.

0 to 3

.5Cu

r~M

rl~nd

RIVE

Rb7

3010

3CU

MBE

RLAN

D5-

PS3

33

32/

9/20

07W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRL id

s For

k 0.0

b 1.

3G

xnb~

rland

RIVE

R51

3010

7HA

RLAN

SPS

33

33

2192

007

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

Lids F

ork d

Y~Ilo

w C

nsk

0.0 t

o 2.9

Orl

an

dRN

ER51

3070

1BE

LL2-

FS3

33

3SI

2R00

2W

AH F

C PC

R SC

Rl

M~

Cro'e

k 2.3

to 5.

5Cu

mb~

rl~nd

RNE

R57

3010

2PU

LASK

I5 -

PS3

33

33I

23f2

006

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

HW C

N~r C

nNt 0

.0 b

10.9

~

Cw

►~I

~nd

RIVE

R51

3010

1BE

LL5 -

NS2B

52

53

~3

1/31

2007

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

LitN~

Hur

k.~r

~ Fo

rk of

B~w

~r C

n~k O

A to

3.9

_ _

__

C~xn

ba~la

ndRI

VER

R IVE

R51

3010

3M

cCRE

ARY

2-FS

33

33

5/2/

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LitUs

Lw

rM R

fwr

12.7

1014

.8

_C

5130

101

LAUR

EL5 -

NS5 -

NS3

33

512x

2002

WIW

FC

PCR

SCR

LHW

Lau

rN R

iver 1

1.8 t

o 23.

0U

Cu

mbe

rland

RIVE

R51

3010

1LA

UREL

35 -

NS3

33

M7N

96B

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LittN

L~un

l Rlv

e O.

O l0

8.4

U

Cum

bert~

nd_

RNER

_51

3010

1LA

UREL

5-PS

5-PS

33

35P

2f200

2 - 31

2212

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LiIW

L~u

nl R

fwr 8

.4 to

12.7

Cum

baAY

ld_

_

RIVE

R ._

RIVE

R_ _

RNER

_ . _

RIVE

R

5730

101

LAUR

EL5-

NS5 -

NS3

33

5/2/

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

LHW

P

Cn~

k 0.

0 to 2

.BU

Cu

nb~r

land

5730

707

_. 513

0101

IOJO

X.-

KNOX

.--

5 -PS

33

33

8231

2000

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

LNtN

C

rwk

3.1 t

o 4.

4 _

. ----

Upp

x Cu

mb~

rl~nd

- 5 -

PS3

~5-

NS3

-5 -

NS3

3W

AH F

C PC

R 3C

RLN

W R

acoo

n C

n~k D

A to

7.7

__

Cunb

~rt~

nd51

3010

2LA

UREL

_5 -

NS- - --

--

__3

_3

1114

/2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lktls

Rod

ca~t

h Ri

ver

0.0 t

o 2.

3Cu

mb~

rl~nd

RIVE

R57

3010

2LA

UREL

2 -FS

33

33

1 /1

002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Lktls

Sou

th Fo

rk 4

.4 to

35.

7U

C~

xnb~

rland

RIVE

R51

3010

4W

AYNE

2-FS

33

2-FS

31 W

1011

008

WAH

FC

PC

SCR

LItW

Sout

hFor

k0.0

lo4.

4Cu

mbs

rf~nd

RNER

5130

104

WAY

NE5-

PS3

33

3M

1H99

9W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RL

Bran

ch O

.Ol0

2.9

Cum

berla

ndRI

VER

5730

101

BELL

2 -FS

33

33

1?J7

1f20

01W

AH F

C PC

R 3C

RCr

ysk O

.O 10

1.4

Cun

~rU

ndRI

VER

5130

101

HARL

AN3

4A-N

S3

33

5128

002

WAH

FC

PCR

3CR

Loon

s C

rwk 3

.4 to

5.9

Cur

nb~r

lrid

RNER

5130

101

HARL

AN3

4A-N

S3

33

512/2

002

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, 3CR

CreN

t 5.9

b 9.

8Cu

mb~

rl~nd

RNER

5130

101

LETC

HER

2-FS

33

33

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

L C

nNt 0

.04 t

o 3.4

5U

~r

Cum

Wd~

ndRI

VER

5130

101

LAUR

EL5 -

NS5 -

NS3

33

5/2/

2002

-11l

If200

8W

AH, f

C, P

CR, S

CRl

C C

rNk

4.5 t

o 10.

5 ~

U

Curt~

bsrla

ndRN

ER57

3010

1W

HITL

EY5 -

PS3

33

39/

8200

0W

AH, F

C PC

R SC

RM

arro

v~bo

rw C

nMc

0.0 l

0 2.

8U

Cu

mb~

rl~nd

RIVE

RRI

VER

5130

103

CUM

BERL

AND

5 -PS

2 -FS

33 3

32/

72/2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Mur

owbo

ns C

mk

13.5

to 15

.2U

Cu

mbe

rland

5730

103

CUM

BERL

AND

2 -FS

33

38/2

012o

D0W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRFA

~r►ow

bon~

Crs

~k 3

.810

8.7

U

Cun

bMr~

dRI

VER

5130

103

CUM

BERL

AND

2-FS

33

~3

3- -

- - 3

---

- --

_ _

3__

_ .3-

----

---

3

32/

1220

06W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRM

wh

CtM

k 0.

0 to 1

3.5

U

Cum

b~rla

~d_

_ RN

ER -

_ -

._ R

NER

_._

_RNE

R --

--

RNER

5130

701.

_ M

cCRE

ARY

----

2-F

S_ 5

-NS

_- _

5-N

S..

_2-

FS

2 -FS

---3

_ , 3

_--

3 3

_

2113

1200

75C

2I200

2W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR-

-_

---

Mir

th C

n~k

13.5

W 1

8.5

U

Cum

bed~

nd57

3010

1 _

.._ M

cCRE

ARY

_._ _

McC

REAR

Y --

CL

AY

_ 3

_3 3

_3 _3_

.3

__W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR__

_~

, __

_ _

__M

anhC

nNcl

9.O

to2,

.1 - -

----

----

----

----

Ml~rti

n Cn~

k 0.

0 to 1

.2U

Cu

mb~

rl~nd

5130

101

_. __

. _,

U1H

998

_BN

8120

00W

AH.F

C,PC

R,SC

R --

r Cur

r~~l

~nd

5130

702

WAH

, FC

PCR

SCR

Mrt

int F

ork

11.8

1017

.45

----

---

--

- -----

Cum

b~rl~

nd--

--

RIVE

R51

3010

1HA

RLAN

5 -NS

33 -

--

-- 3

~2-

FS11

/dW

2008

WAH

, FC

PC

8CR

hMAM

~ For

k 0.0

to 11

.8U

Cu

mbe

rUnd

RIVE

R51

3070

1HA

RLAN

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

33

2111

2007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Mrt

kn F

ork 1

9.4 t

o 28.

85U

C

urnb

Mrid

RIVE

R57

3010

1HA

RIAN

2 5

5 -NS

2B 5

33

11f3

Q200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RAM

rtirN

Fak

2E.9

5 to 3

8.8

Curn

baAa

ndRI

VER

5130

101

FFAR

LAN

2-FS

33

33

10HQ

I200

8W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RM

wtln

'~ F

ork R

Nerv

olr

U

C~xn

Mrl~

ndRE

SERV

OIR

5130

101

HARL

AN2-

FS3

2 -FS

2-FS

31I

1f20

01 -1

1R7f

2008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

McC

artm

o~ &

r~eh

0.0

to 2.

8Cu

mb~

rl~nd

RNER

5730

102

JACK

SON

2-FS

33

33

5f2f

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

McF

rl~nd

Crw

k 0.

8 to 8

.2Cu

rtibM

~nd

RIVE

R51

30]0

3M

ONRO

E2-

FS3

33

37/

7/20

00W

IW, F

C, P

CR, S

CRM

Mdo

w C

rNk

0.0 t

o 7.~

~

C~xn

bel~

ndRN

ER51

3010

1KN

OX5 -

PS3

33

391

~120

0DW

AH F

C PC

R SC

RM

wdo

w F

ork

0.0 t

o 1.

0 ~

Cunb

~A~n

dRI

VER

5130

101

LETC

HER

2-FS

33

33

1?13

/1001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Mwh

~dc C

tMlt

0.0 t

o 2.8

~

Mid

dle F

olk o

f Rod

~euW

Rlw

r O.

O to

7,8_

- ---

- --

--M

iddy

For

k d B

~ww

Cn~

k 0.0

to 2.

3

CuM

wl~

ndRI

VER

___ .

.._RI

VER

_ _ .

...

__

RIVE

RRI

VER

___

RIVE

R ..

_RI

VER

RIVE

R

b730

103

MON

ROE

2-FS

33

33

7/6/

2000

_W

AH F

C PC

R SC

Rum

b~rla

nd_ 5

1301

02_._

5130

103

5130

101

5130

101

.._ J

ACKS

ON .

--M

cCRE

ARY

.--

2 -FS .

--5 -

PS2 -

FS3

93

2H31

2007

-- -

WAH

, FC.

PCR

, SCR

U C

txr~

rl~nd

5-NS 3 3

5-NS 3 3

--.

--- -

____

3

__

3~

3 ~

3

3-

2/12/

2007

_ W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR. _

_ _

_Mi

ddy F

ork o

f Rich

land C

n~k

0.01

01.2

r C~r

r~rt~

ndCu

mb~

rlrid

U Cu

mbe

rland

KNOX

5-PS

__ 2

-FS

391

27@

000

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

Mip

grr

xh d

C

n~k

0.0 M

2.2 _

._._

__ _

.__

Mitl

CrN

k of

Cum

b~rl~

nd R

iver 0

.8 to

5.6

AAill C

nNc d

3 C

n~k

0_0 t

o 3.4

3&1

4/20

07W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR_

5130

101

5130

107

_KN

OXM

cCRE

ARY

_2•

FS3

_.3

312

!6!2

001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

C~xn

b~rl~

ndBE

LL2 -

FS3

33

312

/8120

01W

AN F

C PC

R SC

RMY

te~l

l Cre

ak 0

.0 to

3.8

Curti

b~rl~

ndRN

ER51

3010

2LA

UREL

5-NS

33

3 _

351

2120

D2W

/W F

C PC

R SC

RM

oar~

&rr

ch O

.O M

0.7 i

Cum

b~rl~

ndRN

ER51

3010

1BE

LLSB

-PS

5B-N

S5B

-NS

3 _

351

2120

02 -2

/132

007

WIW

FC

PCR,

SCR

Moo

f~ C

rwk 0

.0 to

4.4

Cur

t~rt~

ndRI

VER

5130

101

KNOX

2fS

33

33

1217

1120

01W

AH f

C, P

CR S

CRM

ud

Cn~k

O.O

IoB.

BC~

rnb~

rl~nd

RNER

5130

103

CUM

BERL

AND

2 -FS

33

33

_W

AH F

C PC

R SC

RM

ud C

rNk d

Cha

r For

k O.O

l0 5.

2Cu

mbK

l~nd

RNER

5130

101

WHI

TLEY

-- 5 -

PS3

33

-- --

- 3

~

~3

~ ~

3

3__

8130

/2000

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

Mud

Lldc

of

Cn~

k 0.0

to 2

.3

---

-Ct

mb~

rl~nd

--

RNER

---

b730

107

KNOX

2-F3

3 3~

3

3 3 3

31Y

ro/2

001

WAM

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

Ned

enne

h 0.

6101

.9Ci

xnbe

land

RNER

RNER

51

102

LAUR

EL2 -

FS2-

FS3

_

12P6

f2001

_

WAH

, FC,

PCR

, SCR

North

Fork

d

x C

rs~k

0.0

to 0.

7C~

xnb~

rl~nd

5130

101

VYHI

TLEY

37/

31/2

001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

305(b) Asss~sm~nt RewIU, 2008

a W A

Otter CnNc 1~.0 to 22.1

________ _

Cumbsrlsrid

Water Bodv Tvo~

CouMv

Q~afan~tW Uus

RIVER

RIVER

5730103

5130101

WAYNE

2-FS

2-F S _

2-FS

2 -FS

3_ 3 3 3

3_3 .,

_3 3

3~. _ 3__

_3 3

3211312007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pstt~non C~k 0.0 to

5.3

U

C~xra»riand

____

Patt~reon CnNc 5.

3 to 9.3

_ _

PNK &aneh O.O l01.D

U

r Curtib.rl~nd

U

Cumb~rl~rW

_RIVER

RNER

5130701

5130102

WHITLEY

WHRLEY

JACKSON

3w6n000

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

3 312/1112001

5 /y1p02

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pilol Crs~k 0.

to 2.5

P{ns Cnelc 2.5 to 5.3

Pifm~n Cn~k 8.15 to 23.4

U

Cumb~rlxW

U

Cumb~rluW

U

Curtib~rfand

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

5130103

5730102

5130103

LINCOLN

L AUREL

PUUSKI

2-FS

2-FS

2-FS

3 32-FS

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

5/2f2002

2/13f2007

2/1~l2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC PC SCR

WAH FC, PCR SCR

Pitman Cn~k 23.410 21.1

U

CumWA~nd

RIVER

5130103

PULASKI

2-FS

33

33

5P212002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pifm~n CrsNt 4.B to 5.95

_U

Cumberland

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

5SPS

33

311l7I2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

Pdrk~r Croak 0.2 W 3.8

U

Cumbert~nd

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

2-FS

33

33

9120@000

WAH, FC, PCR, 3CR

Pond CnNc O.O l0 8

.3Curtib~rt~nd

RIVER

5130102

JACKSON

5 -PS

33

33

4/1412007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Poor Fak of

C~r►

~A~n

d R

lvsr

14.

9101

8,3

U

C~xn

b~Aa

ndR

NE

R51

3010

1HA

RLAN

5 -PS

4MN

S3

2 -FS

32/

7112

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Poor

Fol

k of

Cun

b~A~

nd R

W~r

X1.

4 to

51.

7 _

U

Cum

berla

ndR

NER

5730

101

LETC

HER

2-FS

33

33

1W70

f200

6W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRPo

a Fo

rfc o

f Cum

bM~n

d Riw

r 0.0

to 1

4.9

U

Curti

b~rl~

ndR

IVER

5130

101

HAR

LAN

2-FS

2 -FS

32-

FS2 -

FS2I

14f2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Poor

Fak

of C

unb~

rl~nd

Rlw

r 18.

310

31.8

U a

Cum

berla

ndR

NER

_

5130

101

HARL

AN3

4A-N

S3

2-FS

37J

1~20

07W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRPo

wde

r MiN

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

4.9

Upp

er C

umbe

rland

RN

ER

_51

3010

2LA

UR

EL2-

FS3

33

3Sf

~120

02W

AH F

C P

CR 3

CR

P N

ouw

&in

ch 0

.0 to

7.5

__

_U

~u

mb

~ri

~n

d_

R

IVER

5130

107

LETC

HER

2-FS

33

33

10H0

1200

7W

/1H

FC P

CR S

CRPu

dcN

t CrN

k 0.

0 to

9.9

__

_U

~r

Cum

b~rl~

ndRI

VER

5130

701

BELL

2-FS

4A-N

S3

33

8115

x200

6W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRBr

~neh

O.O

tot.B

Cum

b~rl~

ndR

NER

5130

104

hAeC

REAR

Y2 -

FS3

33

311

H9I

2001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

R~e

eoon

Cre

ek O

.O l0

2.7

U

Curn

b~rl~

ndRI

VER

5130

102

LAUR

EL5 -

PS3

33

38/

15/ 2

000

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Fork

0.0

to 7

.1C

wr~

rl~nd

RIV

ER51

3010

1LE

TCHE

R5-

PS3

33

3W

AH F

C P

C SC

RR~

Mro

C.n

~k O

.O l0

3.0

Cum

berla

ndR

NER

5730

102

ROCK

CAST

LE~r

PS3

33

381

9200

0W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRRim

Cre

ek 7

1.61

0 21

.5C

urnb

elan

dRI

VER

5130

101

KNO

X2-

FS~A

-NS

33

3eH

5200

7W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRRk

M~n

d C

n~k

0,0

to 8

.3r C

urt~

rl~nd

RIV

ER51

3010

1KN

OX

5 -NS

2 -FS

33

3YJ

75f2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

, SCR

R

Fak

0.0

to 3

.8U

~r

Cui

r~rl~

ndR

NER

5130

701

KNO

X2-

FS3

33

33/

22f2

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

R

Prn

ch C

nNt 0

.0 to

7.B

U

Cum

b~rlu

WRI

VER

_ RIV

ER _

_--

-..

RIV

ER _

- -

5130

104

McC

REAR

Y2-

FS2 -

FS2-

FS3

32/

7412

007

WAH

FC

PC

R S

CRR

Pw

rxh

CtN

k 7.

B ro

15_

6 _

.__

__

_U

Cu

mbe

rland

5730

101

- 51

3010

1__

McC

REAR

Y __

LAU

REL

_ 5

-NS

_2'

FS _

-_

SNS_

_-

2-F8

2_FS

~

. 2-

FS2 -

FS2 -

FS

SN

S- 3

_2_

FS.

3 _3 3 3 3

5-NS

_-_

3-

_2-F

S .

3 8-

3 3 ~

3

3-

- _

3. --

--..

---.

-. 3

-_-

3 ~~

--

- - 3

-- -

-- '

S-PS

.- -

- .3 3

32I

1~I2

007

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

RabM

uon

Croa

k BJ

to 9

.6

.,~

..-•

- ---

U

~r C

~xr~

l~nd

_ 3

-3

--- 3

- 3- 3

- 3 3 ~---

- 113

1200

2W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR -

--

Rod

c Cn~

k 0.

0 to

4.3

---.-

---._

----

- C

ut~

rl~nd

_ ._

.__.

RN

ER _

..

_....

_. RI

VER

---

_ RN

ER

- ---

RIV

ER __

..._.

RNE

RR

IVER

_.51

3010

4 _

.51

3070

1--

_~-51

3010

4 _

... 5

1307

045 1

3010

351

3010

2

.. M

cCRE

ARY

- McC

REAR

Y .-

McC

REAR

YM

cCRE

ARY

_ _

PULA

SKI

RO

CKCA

STLE

_2/

14/2

008

----

5!2!

2002

- - _

_.. - -

211 5

12 0 0

7 ~ ~

~ 1H

I200

7__

-~

-- - W

AH, F

C, P

CR

, SCR

-

Rod

c CnN

c 0.

0 ro

5.B

--

.- -,-

Upp

er C

umb~

rlarW

.-

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, 8C

RRo

de C

reek

4.3

to 1

5.5

----

-.--

_

-_ _

Upp

er C

tmb~

rl~nd

_W

AH, F

C, P

CR

, SCR

-{

Rode

Cre

ek 1

8.5

to 2

1.5

-_--

.---

----

---

• ---

Rodt

Lld

t Cn~

k 0.

0 M B

.B. U

pper

Cui

f~er

land

-

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

UppK

Cur

nb~r

l~nd

9/20

!200

0W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRRo

ckc~

~N R

iver

10.

4 to

X18

.1C

ur~

rl~nd

1!31

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

RRo

dtra

ttl~

Riv

er 1

2.3

to 2

7.2

Cum

b~A~

ndRI

VER

5130

102

LAU

REL

2 -FS

2-FS

33

312

!&20

00 -1

2H8/

2006

WAH

FC

PC

SC

RRo

ss B

ench

0.0

W 1

.5Cu

mb~

rl~nd

RIV

ER51

3010

1W

HITL

EY2 -

FS3

33

37Y

N2/2

001

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Roun

daW

ns C

roak

O.O

!010

.9C

umbe

rland

RIV

ER51

3010

2R

OC

KCAS

TIE

2 -FS

5 -PS

33

32H

5/20

07W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRR

ound

don~

Crn

k 17

.1 to

23.

9U

C

unb~

rleM

RN

ER

5130

102

ROCK

CAST

LE5 -

NS

33

33

3!22

1200

8W

AH, F

C P

CR

, SCR

R C

n~k

O.O

Io5.

3U

C

ur~~

l~nd

RIV

ER51

3010

1AA

cCRE

ARY

5-N

S4A

-NS

4A-N

S3

32H

U20

08W

AH F

C P

C

SCR

DW

SSM

t Lid

s Crs

Nc 1.

7 l0

3.6

U

Cum

berla

ndRI

VER

5130

703

RU

S3EL

L2 -

FS3

33

331

72!1

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Sam

&~n

eh O

.O l0

0.5

Cutn

b~rl~

ndR

NE

R51

3010

3PU

LASK

I5 -

PS3

33

351

22W

2W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRSa

nder

s Crw

k O.

O l0

5,3

U

Cix

nb~r

l~nd

RIV

ER51

3010

1W

HIT

LEY

2 -FS

33

33

12f8

1200

1W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRSh

illal~

h C

n~k

OA

l0 5

.5U

Cu

mb~

rl~nd

RIVE

R51

3070

1SE

LL2-

FS3

33

37/

5/20

01W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRSh

ut-in

&an

ch 0.

0 to

1.1

U

r Cum

b~rl~

ndR

IVER

RIVE

R51

3010

151

3010

751

3010

3

McC

REAR

YB E

LLPU

LASK

I

2-FS

5 -N

S2-

FS2-

FS

33

33

12/6

/200

1W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRSi

ms F

ork

0.0

to 5

.2U

Cu

rnb~

dand

33

33

12/N

2001

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

_S'

C

nNt

0 0

to 1

.9U

Cu

rtlb~

Aand

_

_R

IVER

33

_ _

33

_51

7!20

02W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CRS

ChN

t 0.

0 to

10.

0U

C

tHra

»rl~

ndR

IVER

RNE

R

-__-

5130

102

- 51

3070

2LA

WRE

L3

3~

3-

---~- 3

--_

_-

3

3-

3~

10H

Of2

008

CAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR

Skrd

C

rssk

70.

Oto

13.3

Cum

berla

ndLA

UR

EL

---_

2-FS

----

33_

3--

5/21

2002

WAH

FC

PC

R,S

CR

3 C►

~Nt 1

3.3

tot6

,3U

C

tanb

Ml~

nd--

-R

IVER

5130

102

LAUR

EL2-

FS3

3_

517!

2002

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Cn~

k 0.

0 to

3.3

Cur

nbKl

~nd

RN

ER

5130

702

ROCK

CAST

LE5 -

PS3

33

32H

5/20

07W

AH F

C P

CR S

CRSk

C1

MIc

3.3

to 1

7.1

Cum

6~rl~

ndR

NER

5130

102

ROCK

CAST

LE2-

FS3

33

38/

21f2

007

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

SmkA

Cre

ek 0

.0 to

3.3

U

CuM

~rl~

ndR

NE

R51

3010

1LE

TCHE

R2-

FS3

33

312

/612

001

WAH

FC

PCR

3C

R

__

Sout

h Po

rk C

umb~

rl~nd

Riv

er 4

3.0

to 4

8.7

U

Cix

ob~r

land

RN

ER57

3010

4M

cCRE

ARY

2 -FS

2 -FS

32-

FS3

1 W

70I2

008

WAH

FC

PCR

SCR

Sout

h Fo

rk C

umb~

rl~nd

Riv

er X

8.7 l

0 54

.0U

C

urt

~ri

rid

RIV

ER51

301 W

McC

REAR

Y2-

FS3

33

31/

31'10

02_

WAH

, FC

, PC

R, S

CR _

_So

uth

Fork

d C

oI1M

n Crs

~k O

.O !0

1.9

Cum

berla

ndR

NE

R51

3070

7LE

TCHE

R5 -

PS3

33

31~

f200

7W

AH, F

C, P

CR S

CRSa

Ah

Fork

of

SI

~r C

rs~k

0.0

to 4

.8U

r C

unbe

rl~nd

RN

ER

5130

101

WHI

TLEY

2 -FS

33

33

~ 71

5/20

01_

_ W

AH, F

C P

CR, S

CR _

3a~t

h Fo

rk o

f Rod

ca~t

N R

lwr

21.2

to 2

9.1

~U

Cu

rnb~

rland

RN

ER51

~1D

2~

LAU

REL

5-NS

- -

33

33

8/21

/200

7CA

H, F

C, P

CR, S

CR-

----- -

---

Sout

h Fo

rk M

Rod

cwW

Riv

er 4

.3 to

5.B

U

C~rn

b~rl~

nd-- --

----

___

, .__ R

IVER

_ __ _

_RN

ER

_ __

RIV

ER

_R

NE

R

5130

102

._ JA

CKSO

N_

2~S

__

2-FS

_ 3

33

7470

/200

8 __

__ _

WAH

, FC

, PCR

, SCR _

__

_ _ _

.___

____

Croa

k 1.

3 to

3.8

Upp

er C

unb~

rl~nd

U C

umbs

rl~nd

_ _51

3070

55 7

3070

551

3010

1

CLIN

TON

CLIN

TON

___

2 -FS

2 -FS

3 ,3 3

3 3__

3

3. _

3

, __

__3

3 32!

1&20

077!

5/20

01

____

_ W

AH, F

C, P

CR, S

CR

_Cr

eak

3.81

07.4

WAH

,FC

,PC

R,S

CR

____

.._._

_

Stw

~o

n B

reec

h 0.

0 M 1.

9U

C

umW

rl~nd

BELL

__5 -

NS3

12/1

7200

7W

AH F

C P

CR S

CR

305(b)

~m~nt Rewfls, 2008

W In

St

Cnsk O.O to 2.1

S

Cn~k 11.3 to 12.E

3t

Fork O.Oto2.3

S

Fork 0.0 M 5.3

Sln

CreNt 0.0 fo 1.7

CumbMand

U

Cunberlx~d

U

Curt~rl~nd

Cur~rl~rW

Curt~berl~rld

RNER

RNER

RIVER

RIVER

RNER

RIVER

5730101

5130701

5130701

5130101

5130107

KNOX

KNOX

BELL

BELL

BELL

5 -NS

5-PS

5 -N3

5 -NS

28(5)

5-NS

3 3 3~ ~A-NS

5 -NS

3 3 3 3

~

3 3 3 3 3 3

~

3 3 3 3 3

1I3R007

BN4l2oo5

1 28/2000

121612000

S r2/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH PC PCR sCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

S

CnNc 1.7 M 23.3

U

r Curtib~rl~nd

5130107

BELL

_SPS

2-FS

3 ~

32H82007

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

C

Brr~ch 0.0 to 1.4

U

C~xnWrlsnd

RIVER

RNER

5130102

PULASKI

5-NS

2-FS

5-NS

3 3

5 -NS

3 3

3

~3 3

3 33121/2008

~ 715@001 - ~

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Cn~k 1.7 to 5.1

Cunb~riand

~ 513D105

CLINTON

WAH FC PCR SCR

Creek 0.5 to

28

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

~5130103

MONROE

2-FS

3 3u

~~

WAH, fC PCR, SCR

WAH FC PCR SCR

Cn~k 5.2 to

8.1

C~xr~A~nd

RIVER

5130105

CUMBERLAND

2-FS

33

3Tna&tnchO.Dto3.0

Cumberland

RIVER

5130701

KNOX

2-FS

33

33

Mt1t998

WAH FC PCR SCR

TrartmNl Fork W Mush Croak OA l01.9

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

McCREARY

2-F$

33

33

12/1?f1001

WAH FC PCR SCR, DWS

T

CENkO.Olo11

Cunb~rland

RIVER

5730107

KNOX

2 -FS

33

33

12!112001

WAH FC PCR SCR DWS

T Wu

rCumb~rl~nd

RESERVOIR

5130102

JACKSON

2-FS

32-FS

32-FS

1124/2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Acom Fork

O.O !01.0

Curtib~rt~nd

RNER

5130101

KNOX

2-FS

33

33

12N2I2001

WAH FC PC SCR

UT to B CI

Cn~k 0.0 W 0.5

_ _

U

~r Cumberland

RIVER

5130103

PUI,ASKI

35B-PS

33

3SfL200Z

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to B Ctwlc 0.0 to 1.8

____

U

~r Cumbelrid

_RIVER

._5130104

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

3I26f2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to

ForkO.Oto0.1

______._____

U

Curtibxiand

RIVER

5130101

McCREARY

5&PS

33

33

512/2002

WAH FC PCR,SCR

UT to

C

Fo11t 0.0 to 0.8

_U

Ctrnb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130103

RUSSELL

_3

33 3 3

~ ~-

g 3 3

33

WAH FC PCR, SCR

UT to H~Mon &inch D.0 ro 0.4

_U

Cun~rl~nd

- RIVER

~..- RNER

5130701

KNOX

5-PS

5-NS

_ _._ ~S

5B-PS

3 3:_ _3- 3

3 3-

---._

3_.

._._ ._...

3_

~ 3

33Q3/2008

WAM FC PCR SCR

WAH FC PCR, SCR

UT to

Br~h 0.0 W 1.3

-Cumb~rlr~d

-5130101

McCREARY

3--3 , 3

~ 11119f2007

UT to LItW Lwnl Rlwr 0.0 b L4

- - ---

Cumbsd~nd

_ __ RNER _

_RNER

RNER

5130701

---

_ LAUREL _

JACKSON

BHI12007

WAH, FC, PCR, 3CR, DWS

UT to Pond Cn~k O.O l0 0.2

UT to PondCn~kO.Olo0.2 ~_`

U

Cumb~rlrM

--5730102

_512/2002

WI1H FC PCR SCR

U

Cumberland

5130102

JACKSON

SB-PS

58-PS

352@002

WAH FC PCR,SCR

___ _~_

UT to Rode CnNc 0.0 M 1.2

Ctxnbeland

__RNER

51301M

McCREARY

2 -FS

33

33

5122002

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT b Rods CfsNt 0.0101.3

U

Curt~rl~nd

RIVER

5130104

McCREARY

2 -FS

33

33

11/192001

WAH FC PCR SCR

UT to Rode Ct~Nc 0.0 M 7.9

U

Curt~Wrl~rW

RIVER

5130104

McCREARY

2-FS

33

_3

311H712007

WAH FC PCR SCR

WNlirw CtNk O.O l0 4,2

U

CumbxUnd

RNER

5130101

HARLAN

5-NS

33

33

7/1912007

WAH FC PCR SCR

W~tb &inch 0.0 W 2.8

Curt~i~nd

RIVER

5130104

McCREARY

2-FS

33

33

11H92007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Watt Cn~k 0.0 b 1.3

U

er Cunb~rland

RNER

5130101

WHRLEY

2-FS

33

33

Z15f2002

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

W~Ns Cn~k 20 b 1.~

U

Cumb~f~nd

RNER

RIVER

5130101

HARLAN

2-FS

33

33

14/12001

WAH FC PCR, SCR

Whig ONc CnNt 0.0 to

1.0

Cumbeland

5130702

LAUREL

5-NS

33

33

8!1/2002

WAH FC PCR SCR

WMt~ Odc Cn~k 1.0 to 5.7

Curt~fand

RNER

5130102

UUREL

2-FS

33

33

81212007

WAH, FC, PCR, SCR

While ONc Crs~k 1

.1 l0 22

U

Curnb~rland

RNER

RIVER

5130102

ROCKCASTLE

2-FS

33

33

522002

WAH FC PCR SCR

Whf1~ Oak Cask O.O l0 4.2

U

Cumb~Aand

51301 W

McCREARY

5-NS

5-PS

2-FS

2-FS

33

2/92008

CAH, FC, PCR, SCR

Whin Oak CrNk 7.1 to 11.2

U

CWnt~rl~nd

RIVE R

b130103

PULASKI

33

33

7!192007

WAH CAH FC, PCR, SCR, DWS

Whit

Brrxh O.O!01.0

U

Cumb~rl~nd

RIVER

5130101

LAUREL

58-N S

58-PS

33 3

35/2@002

WAH, PC PCR SCR

Bmeh 1

.1 to 2.8

Cunb~rland

RIVER

5130101

LAUREL

35-NS

33

1l11799E

WAH FC PCR 3CR

WIWcN Bnneh O

.O l0 2.1

CuMM~nd

RNER

5130103

PULASKI

4A -NS

4A-NS4A-NS

33

2/7~l2008

WAH FC PCR SCR

WoN Cn~k OA to 1.8

Cunbarlrtd

RIVER

5730107

WHITLEY

5-NS

33

33

8f22/2000

WAH FC PCR SCR

Waad Creak 0.0 M 1.95

Curtib~rl~nd

RIVER

5130102

LAUREL

5-NS

33

33

2H912007

WAH FC PC SCR

yy~ ~~ ~

U

C~xnbxl~nd

RESERVOIR

5730102

LAUREL

2-FS

32-F3

32-FS

124f2008

WAH FC PC SCR

YNlow Cnsk O.O l0 8.7

C~xnbal~rW

RNER

5130101

BELL

5-PS

2-F3

33

3BH8I2007

WAH FC PCR SCR

YNlow Croelt 8

.7 b 15.9

U

Cwnbsrl~nd

RNER

5130101

BELL

2-F8

33

33

811812007

WAH FC PCR 8CR

YNlow CrMlt B au O.O l0 3.2

Cumbalend

RNER

5130101

BELL

2-FS

33

33

3I2W2007

WAH FC PC SCR

Yoeurn Creek 0.0 M 8.5

U

CunhsA~nd

RNER

5130101

HARLAN

34A-NS

33

3BN612007

WAH FC PCR SCR

Y

Creek O.Ol05A

Cunb~rland

RNER

5130101

WHITLEY

2-FS

33

33

82112000

WAH FC PCR 3CR

Appendix B. Reach Indexing Maps of Assessed Streams in theUpper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMLJ andGreen — Tradewater Rivers BML1

Figure B-7

: Reach ind

exin

g results of str

eams

assessed

in the Upp

er Cum

berl

and River basin for

Aqu

atic

Life Use

1

. ~~

SOMERSET

,,.

r.

, ~

i

y\ ~

r✓~

: ~J~

.~

_

BURKESVILLE

Miles

0 5 10

20

30

40

Source 2008 Integrated Report to Congress

~~ '~

l

~ ~ ~

f'' ~'

~.

,x ~'

;`'

_t

~

~~ ~ .~

-~~~

~

~ Aq

uati

c Li

fe Use

Ful

ly Supporting

WILLtAMSBURG

Part

iall

y Su

ppor

ting

Not Supporting

Streams >/= 4th Ord

erL1 City

8-digit HUC

Cou

nty

Figure B-2

: Reach ind

exin

g re

sult

s of str

eams

assessed in

the Upp

er Cumberland Ri

ver ba

sin for

Pri

mary

Contact Rec

reat

ion Use

M

N

N

4

BURKESVILLE

_

Miles

0 5 10

20

30

40

SOMERSET

WILLIAMSBURG

Primary Co

ntac

t Recreation

Fully Sup

port

ing

Par

tial

ly Sup

port

ing

Not

Sup

port

ing

Str

eams

>/= 4th

Ord

er

~~ City

8-digit HUC

County

Sou

rce 20

Q8_ integrated Report to

Congress

-_

,—~.

F igure B-3

: Reach ind

exin

g re

sult

s of

streams ass

esse

d in

the Upper Cum

berl

and Ri

ver ba

sin for

Sec

onda

ry Contact Recreation Use

N A

w

Mile

s0

a 10

20

30

40

Fully Supporting

Par

tial

ly Supporting

Not Sup

port

ing

Streams >/=

4th Order

City

&di

git HUC

Cou

nty

Source 20081ntegrated Report to Congress

Figure B-4

: Reach ind

exin

g results of

str

eams

assessed in

the Upper Cumberland Ri

ver ba

sin for

Fish Consumption Use

Mil

es0 5 10

20

30

40

Full

y Su

ppor

ting

Partially Sup

port

ing

Streams >/=

4th Order

City

8-d

igit

HUC

Cou

nty

Sou

rce 200A_lntegrated Report to Congress

BURKESVILLE

WILLiAMSBURG

Fish

Con

sump

tion

,~

F igure B-5: Reach indexing re

sult

s of str

eams

assessed

in the

Upper Cumberland Riv

er bas

in for

Dri

nkin

g Water Source Use

Miles

d 5 10

20

30

40

Drinking Wat

er Sou

rce

Fully Sup

port

ing

Str

eams

>/=

4th Order

U

City

8-digit HUC

County

Source 2008 Int

egra

ted Re

port

to Congress

BURKESVILLE

WILLIAMSBURG

Figure B-6: Re

ach indexing results of streams assessed in the 4 -

Rivers basin (lo

wer Cumberland, Mississippi,

Ohio an

d Tennessee ri

vers

) for Aqu

atic

Life Use

EDDYVI LLE

i

HICKMAN

Miles

0 5 10

20

30

40

HOPKINSVILLE

N A

.~

Aquatic Life Use

Ful

ly Sup

port

ing

Par

tial

ly Sup

port

ing

Not

Supporting

Streams >/=4th Or

der

p

City

8-Di

git HUC

Cou

nty

Source 20

08In

tegrated Report to

Congress

,~

F igu

re B-7: Reach ind

exin

g re

sult

s of streams assessed in the 4-Rivers basin (l

ower

Cum

berl

and,

Mis

siss

ippi

,Ohio and Ten

ness

ee riv

ers)

for Primary Contact Recreation Use

EDDYVILLE

a~ i V

HICKMAN

Miles

0 5 10

20

30

40

HOPKINSVILLE

Primary Contact Re

crea

tion

Use

Fully Sup

port

ing

Par

tial

ly Sup

port

ing

Not

Supporting

Str

eams

>/=

4th Or

der

Q

City

8-Digit HUC

County

Source 2008 Int

egra

ted Re

port

to Congress

Figure B-8

: Reach ind

exin

g results of str

eams

ass

esse

d in

the 4-Rivers ba

sin fl

ower

Cumberland, Mis

siss

ippi

,t~ii

o and Tennessee

riv

ers)

for Primary Contact Recreation Use

EDDYVILLE

w

HICKMAN

Miles

0 5 10

20

30

40

HOPKINSVILLE

N

Sec

onda

ry Contact Rec

reat

ion Use

---

- Fully Supporting

Par

tial

ly Supporting

Not

Supporting

Str

eams

>/=4th Or

der

p

Ciry

8-Digit HUC

County

Source 200P-~^tegreted Report to Congress

~

-~

Figure B-9: Reach in

dexi

ng results of streams as

sess

ed in the 4 -

Rivers basin {lower Cu

mber

land

, Mississippi,

Ohio and Tennessee rivers) fo

r Fish Con

sump

tion

Use

N A

i

Miles

0 5 10

20

30

40

Source 2008 Int

egra

ted Re

port

to Congress

~PKI

NSVI

LLE

i--J

Fish

Consumption Use

--c~- Fu

lly Supporting

Par

tial

ly Supporting

Not

Sup

port

ing

Str

eams

>/=4th Or

der

Q

City

8-Digit HUC

Cou

nty

Figu

re B-1

0: Reach indexing results of

streams assessed in the 4-R

iver

s basin (lower Cumberland, Mississippi,

Ohio and Tennessee rivers) fo

r Drinking Water Source Use

td i 0

HICKMA

,.

Miles

0 5 70

20

30

40

_LE

N

Drin

king

Water Source

---~ Fully Supporting

Partially Supporting

Not

Supporting

Streams >/=4th Or

der

Q

City

8-Digit HUC

County

Source 2008 Int

egra

ted Report to Congress

. -~

~

-~

Figu

re B-~1: Reach indexing results of streams ass

esse

d in

the Gre

en Riv

er bas

in for Aquatic Life Us

e.

Aquatic Lif

e

--~--

- Fu

lly Supporting

Par

tial

ly Supporting

— Not Sup

port

ing

— Streams =h 4th

Ord

er

<~

City

8-Digit HUC

Cou

nty

N

r V

.r

f

~ ~

t

Jf 1

~ J

Mad

ison

vill

e 0

i~

~~ f ~~

~ -~

~- .`~ ~~ ~,

~~

Liberty

~

~

{

~..

-- .~ f

.-~

L

h

~ '~-

Eliz

abet

htow

n

'+~

~

4 ~ ~

~P'r

0

10

20

40

60

80 M

iles


Figure B-12: Reach indexing re

sult

s of streams assessed

in the Gre

en River basin for Pri

mary

Contact

Rec

reat

ion Use.

Primary Contact Recreation

----

- Fully Su

ppor

ting

.e~~„~

Partially Su

ppor

ting

Not Supporting

Str

eams

=/>

4th

Order

Owensboro

Eliz

abet

htow

n

N

Madisonville ~~•

Source 200P - grated Report to Congress

—__-__

.~

\

0

10

20

40

60

80 Mi

les

;~ ~~~

&Di

git HUC

County

—~

-f

:,

Liberty

~1

Figure B-13: Rea

ch indexing results of streams ass

esse

d in

the Gre

en Riv

er basin fio

r Secondary Co

ntac

tRec

reat

ion Us

e.Se

cond

ary Co

ntac

t Recreation

i w

Madi

s

0

10

20

40

60

80 Mi

les

Source 2008 Int

egra


Figu

re B-14: Reach ind

exin

g results of

i str

eams

assessed

in the

Green Riv

er basin for Fis

h Co

nsum

ptio

n Us

e.

Fish Consumption Use

— Fu

lly Supporting


Not Sup

port

ing

Streams =/> 4ih

Ord

er

~~,

City

&Digit HUC

County

Elizabethtown

~i°

Madi

sonv

ille

v

0

10

20

40

60

80 Mi

les

Source 200f' ' ~~grated Rep

ort to

Congress

i r~

Figure B-15: Rea

ch indexing results of

streams ass

esse

d in

the Gre

en Riv

er bas

in for Drinking Wa

ter Source Use.

Dri n

king Water Source

,~

.-~--~

~- Fu

lly Su

ppor

ting

Partially Sup

port

ing

Not

Sup

port

ing

Str

eams

=h 4th Order

<>

City

Owensboro

8-D

igit

HUC

Cou

nty

_ ~

Eliz

abet

htow

n~

,

y"'

~ ,N

Libe

rty

~,~°•

Mad

ison

vill

e

~

~

N

Bowling Green

/V

0

70

20

40

60

80 M

iles

Source 2008 Int

egra


Figure B-16: Reach indexing resulfis of streams assessed in the Tradewater Riverbasin for Aquatic Life Use.

l

N

Aquatic Life

Fully Supporting

Partially Supporting-- Not Suppofing

~,l City

-- Streams =/>4th Order

8-Digit HUC

County

Henderson

~_

'-`~ ' r

~ ~

.. ~~~ -. r 1

0 8 16 24 32Miles


~_~

• 1

~"'~ ~1

B-16

Figure B-17: Reach indexing results of streams assessed in the Tradewater Riverbasin fior Primary Contact Recreation Use.

Primary Contact RecreationFully Suppor4ng

C


B-17

Figure B-18: Reach indexing results of streams assessed in the Tradewater Riverbasin for Secondary Contact Recreation Use.

N

ASecondary Contact Recreafion

Fully Supporting

C_


B-18

Figure B-19: Reach indexing results of strearris assessed in the Tradewater Riverbasin for Drinking Water Source Use.

N

Drinking Water Saurce

Fully Supporting


--~-- Not Supporting

-- Streams =h4th Order~, City

8-Digit HUG

0 8 16 24 32Miles


B-19

to i N O

Figure B-21: Reach indexing results of springs ass

esse

d in the Green Riv

er basin for Primary

Contact Recreation Us

e.

~.I~"

i

~ l

~~ f

~ ~~~~ ~,

~V

~

~ r

~

,

~~tr"~.` ~f

Madisonvillev

R

'~~

~'

~~

~

}r

~ ~

J Bo

wlin

g Green.

N

/V

Primary Contact Recreation

/.

Partially Su

ppor

ting

~ No

t Su

ppor

ting

—

Streams =h 4th Ord

er

~~>

City

8-D

igit

HUC

County

0

10

20

40

60

80Mi

les

Appendix C. Use Assessment Maps of Lakes and ReservoirsMonitored in the Upper Cumberland — 4-Rivers BMU

and Green — Tradewater Rivers BMU.

Figure C-1:

Monitoring locations, trophic state in

dex and general use support on

Lake Cumberland in the

upper Cumberland Ri

ver basin.

f lL~

RUSSELL

COUNTY

n

PULA

SKI

COUNTY

4,

Assessed Lakes)

~ Fully Sup

port

s Assessed Uses

~ Impaired for One or More Uses

County

Major Rivers

t Sample Loc

atio

ns

L 7

.~

V~

U O

Cumberlan Rivec

~~o j~ ~0 ~

c~ / ~

m

Lake

Cumberland

TSI = 39

Oli

gotr

ophi

c

WAYNE COUNTY

0

2.5

5

7.5

10 Mi

les

f171

MICR EARY

COUNTY

.~ ~= a c ~a -a a U

Figure C-2:

Monitoring locations, tr

ophi

c state index an

d general us

e su

ppor

t on Dale Hollow Reservoir in the

Nupper Cumberland Ri

ver basin.

'~

Cumberland

Co~mty

n i N

TENNESSEE

Clinton

County

Dal

e Ho

llow

Reservoir

TS I = 40

Oligotrophic

~,

Dam

Assessed Lakes

Fully Supports Assessed Uses

A

; —' ""'~

"',.

~^ Im

pair

ed for

One or More Uses

Kentucky Bo

rder

0

2

4

6

8

County Boundaries

Miles

~ Sample Loc

atio

ns

Figure C-3

: Monitoring loc

atio

ns, trophic state index and general use support on Laurel River and Corbin Ci

ty~~

reservoirs in the upper Cumberland River bas

in.

G~eeK~``~

c,°~~

N

~ i

A

w

C~\

R~~

eC

m~

/

Assessed Lakes)

y;;~


Impaired for One or More Uses

Str

eams

~_; County

• Sample Locations

~~G n mC

WHITLEY COUNTY

,_ z

LAUREL COUNTY

Laurel River Re

serv

oir

TSI = 39

Oligotrophic

~~'

J

Corbin Cit

y Re

serv

oir

TSI = 48

Eutrophic

Da

m a~ w c

0

0.5

1 1.5

2Miles

Figure C-4

: Monitoring locations, t

roph

ic state index and general use sup

port

on Martins Fork Reservoir

and Cranks Creek Lake in th

e upper~Cumberland River basin.

N

~s ~e~

e~

~.

G~a~

Har

lan Co

unty

~C°cy ~~

`°

Cranks Creek Lake

Mar

tins

Fork Reservoir

y

TSI = 35

TSI

= 43

crar

'~

Olig

otro

phic

Mesotrophic

Dam

~~~~ Dam

~Fo~

~a~

~r

Asse

ssed

Lakes)

Fully Sup

port

s Assessed Uses

~ Impaired fo

r One or More Uses

Streams

~,~

v(',

KY

0 Kent

ucky

Border

~~G

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6


Miles

J~~GIN~A

n i

Figure C-5: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Cannon Creek and Chenoa lakes in the upperCumberland River basin.

s

Bell County ' ~ .~Dam

~ CN

~~ ~~ ,

_:V~ ~ ~

c°c °~'Gam N~,

m

Assessed Lakes) Cannon Creek Lake

Fully Supports Assessed Uses TSI = 33

I mpaired for One or More Uses Oligotrophic

--- Streams 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8• Sample Locations Mile

C-5

~-6

Figure C-7: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Laurei Creek Lake in the upper CumberlandRiver basin.

~~ NGee

¢~,J

' Daniel Boone~ National Forest

McCreary County

DamAssessed Lakes)

:, Fully Supports Assessed Uses

Laurel Creek Lake ~ impaired for One or More Uses

TSI = 52 Streams

Eutrophic • Sample Locations

~a~te~ Y Cr~~

GN

~'~ ~ ~~

~' e~~'~ r'~'~~

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mike

C-7

Figure C-8: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Wood Creek Lake in the upper CumberlandRiver basin.

N

w~~ AaC~mm

Dam

Daniel BooneNational Forest

_-_-f

r .\ggranch Wood Creek LakeTSI = 43Mesotrophic

G~~lis Branch

GreekW o°a

Assessed Lakes)

Fully Supports Assessed UsesImpaired for One or More UsesStreams

• Sample Location

G

Jackson County 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6Miles

C-8

rFigure C-9: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general use support

~on Kentucky Lake and Lake Barkley in the 4-Rivers basin.

CALDWELLCOUNTY

N _ 4mberland River

C ~~LIVI NGSTONCOUNTY

~ Uh io Rivec~ ;~

e~~nessee~

Dams

Kentucky LakeTS1=61Eutrophic

MARSHALLCOUNTY

GALLOWAY COUNTY

Assessed Lakes}

Assessed Lakes)

Major RiversCounty

•~• Kentucky Boundary Line• Sample Locations

0 3 6 9 12Miles

LYONCOUNTY

Y._'k,.y

s'~:~-~ ~' rf

Lake Barkley~~ ~ TSI = 55F;#. Eutrophic

1;~~e

TRIGGCOUNTY

TENNESSEE

i

. ~~

a0000

C-9

Figure C-10: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general use supporton Energy, Hematite and Honker lakes in the 4-Rivers basin.

:;N

Dam

"~~

~~Honker Lake ~TSI = 48

~ _-~ Mesotrophic ~L~

_s ,,_~ ~;-s ~ `DamJ ~a~ Hematite Lake

TSI = 44~ Mesotrophica~

a~ma~ .-.c~J

Lyon, Trigg Counties

Dam

Assessed Lakes Energy LakeFully Supports Assessed Uses TSI = 61Impaired for One or More Uses Eutrophic

y County Boundary

---- Streams

Sample Locations

0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1 2Mile

C-10

Figure C-11: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on lakes Blythe and Morris in the 4-Rivers basin,

N

A

Christian County

Lake MorrisTSI = 66Eutrophic

Lake Blythe _ - "~- , ~TS I = 46 yMesotrophic

~~__

Dam '~~+~.-

~-UT ,,~~~fo ~~~

t~ ~ ~o

~,'~ Dam ~~' k ~ ~

~~r~~mL,

W ~

TCd

` `~aa~~c

GAssessed Lakes ~

Full Su ~y pports Assessed Uses

Impaired fa Ore or More Uses

Streams

Sample Locations 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2Miles

C-11

Figure C-12: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Arrowhead, Buck, Fish and Flat lakes and Burnt,Long and Swan ponds in the 4~Rivers basin. t

NBallard WildlifeManagement Area

Flat Lake

~ Burnt Pond TSI = 64

TSI = 60 Eutrophic

~~ Eutrophic

~ ~ Arrowhead Lake=: TSI = 68

Eutrophic

.:

c

Ballard County

Long PondTSI = 60Eutrophic

Swan PondTSI = 70Hypereutrophic

Assessed Lakes


I mpaired for One or More Uses


Fish LakeTSI = 68Eutrophic

Buck LakeTSI = 64Eutrophic

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1Mile

C-12

Figure C-13: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Metropolis Lake in the 4-Rivers basin.

N

A

~h~o

~'%~°r

Metropolis LakeTSI = 62Eutrophic

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mile

Assessed Lakes

Fully Supports Assessed Uses~ Impaired for One or More Uses

• Sample Location °

McCracken County

C-13

Figure C-14: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Beaverdam, Happy Hollow, Mitchell, Shelby andTurner lakes in the 4-Rivers basin.

N

— any

aBallard County ~~

Shelby Lake~J TSI = 60~- Eutrophic

~r~~ •

t Turner LakeTS1=59Eutrophic

Ballard State Waterfowl Mitchell Lake

Management Area Tsi = ssHypereutrophic

•

Happy Hollow LakeTSI = 75 Beaverdam LakeHypereutrophic ~ TSI = 86 Assessed Lakes

Hypereutrophic Fully Supports Assessed Uses

:- .:~ impaired for One or More Uses


0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2Miles

C-14

Figure C-15; Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Barren River Reservoir in the Green River basin°

~~ ~~ ....._

:C~ /

~~995 Cree5 ~

~

,

-~'' eea rren R~ ~-

Dam

BARRENCOUNTY

•

,:~, x~~,~ b ..

Assessed Lakes)


I mpaired for One or More Use

- Streams =/> 4th Order

D County• Sample Locations

.;;~

Pe'~~~ Creek

Barren River ReservoirTSI = 52Eutrophic

~... "."~

~eeKG

ALLEN c~' MONROECOUNTY -°i COUNTY

~~ {ed~

1_. - ~~~er _ ~ \.

0 0.5 1 2 3 4Miles ~.

C-15

Figure C-16: Monitoring locations, tr

ophic state index and general use support on Nolin Riv

er Reservoir

i n the Green River basin.

Assessed Lakes)

Ful

ly Supports Assessed Uses

Impaired for One or More Use

Streams =/> 4th Order

~ County

•

Sample Locations

n i o,

EDM

COU

0

0.5

1 2

3

4Miles

Dam

n i V

Figure C-17:

Assessed Lakes)

Moni

tori

ng locations, t

roph

ic state ind

ex and gen

eral

use support on Rough Riv

er Reservoir

in the

Green Riv

er basin.

tN n

~~

4

ON~ ~

t ~"

Ful

ly Sup

port

s As

sess

ed Uses

~ Impaired fo

r One or More Use

Str

eams

=/> 4th

Ord

er

~ County

• Sample Loc

atio

ns

diver

R°J~~

Dam

Rough River Reservoir

TSI = 50

Eut

roph

ic

BRECKINRIDGE

COUNTY

r-„

~.~

C/~fy ~ C,, m ~~

GRAYSON

COUNTY

0

0.5

1 2

3

4Mi

les

Figure C-18: Monitoring locations, tr

ophic state index and general use support on Green River Reservoir

in the Green River basin.

--~~

Assessed Lakes)



Streams =/> 4th Order

~ County


Green River Reservoir

T SI=54

Eutrophic

Wilson CreeK

TAYLOR COUNTY

n i~i

~c c~

Dam

N

ADAIR COUNTY

e~~e

~5ey G /

V

~~

seen River

C~

~-~

0

0.5

1 2

3

4Miles

Figure C-1

9: Mon

itor

ing lo

cati

ons,

tro

phic

state ind

ex and gen

eral

use support on Lake Malone in th

eGreen Riv

er basin.

.~ ;~ U

Lake Malone

Dam

o~

TSI

= 60

~Eutrophic

~~`~ ~~

~ p Ur Sp

ring

Cr~,~~

n i

,~,

TODD COUNTY

Assessed Lakes)

Ful

ly Sup

port

s As

sess

ed Uses

Impa

ired

for

One or More Use

Selected Streams

I~

~J County Boundary ?o

lygo

ns

~ Sample Locations

0

0.5

`I 1.5

~v

,,

N

MUHLENBERG

COUNTY

2 ~ Mi

les

LOGAN COUNTY

n i N 0

Figure C-20: Mon

itor

ing lo

cati

ons,

trop

hic state in

dex and general use

support on Car

pent

er and Kingfisher

l akes in

the

Green Riv

er bas

in.

Car

pent

er Lake

TSI = 65

Ass

esse

d Lakes)

Eutt'OphiC

Ful

ly Supports As

sess

ed Use

s

~ Imp

aire

d fo

r One or More Use

Str

eams

• Sample Loc

atio

ns

Gt~e~

Kingfisher Lake

Q~Q

TSI = 66

Eut

roph

ic

Dams

k

+V ~°

NDaviess Cou

nty

~0 rn Q

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 M

ile

~~ `\

Figure C-21; Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general use support on Spa and'Briggs lakes in the

Green River basin.

~ ~~

~~;~ck

~o ~

n NSpa Lake

TSI = 58

Eutrophic

N

Briggs Lake

TSI = 65

Eutrophic

t 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

_ __

Mile

Logan County

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1Mile

Assessed Lakes)

~

""''

Full

y Su

ppor

ts Assessed Uses

'~'


a

Streams

~J

uTt

io


Figu

re C-2

2: Monitoring locations, tr

o.ph

ic sta

te ind

ex and gen

eral

use sup

port

and Spu

rlin

gton

Lake in th

e Green Riv

er basin.

Campbellsville City Res

ervo

ir7SI = 58

Eutrophic

n i N N

Assessed Lakes)

Ful

ly Sup

ports Assessed Uses

'. ~

Impaired for

One or More Use

Str

eams


.Campbellsville City Reservoir's

N

Spurlington Lake

TS1=61

Eutrophic

•

Dam

Taylor County

0

0.2

0.4 ~ 0.6

0.

8 Mile

~~o

e< '

Sr~0.

1 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

Mile

Figure C_23: Mon

itor

ing locations, trophic state ind

ex and general use support on Freeman/and Salem lakes

`inrthe Green Riv

er basin. ~

~'

Freeman Lake

~

NTS1=59

Eutrophic

1

Assessed Lakes)

Fully Sup

port

s As

sess

ed Uses

.,~

;,, Impaired for One or More Use

Salem Lake

TS1=61

Str

eams

Eutrophic


n i N w

Da rr

f a~i U C0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

~M

ile

a~ "-

Hard

in Cou

nty

Laru

e Co

unty

/ ~r

Fork No~~~~

~o

~~er

0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

Mile

Figure C-24~ Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupporfi on Grapevine and Nortonvill~e lakes in theGreen River basin.

~~a~ Creek~tio

J N

Dam

Grapevine Lake~ TSI = 47

Mesotrophic

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Hopkins CountyMile

Assessed Lakes)


Impaired for One or More Use ~-- -Stream ~/• Sample Locations ~~

/'~ i

--~ ~UT to Drakes Creek

Dam

•

~.,

..

Nortonville LakeFish Consumption Use

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mile

G-24

Figure~C-25: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Shanty Hollow Lake and West Fork Drakes CreekReservoir in the Green River basin.

Clay dick

Dam

Warren County

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

Assessed Lakes)


Impaired for One or More Use— Streams


~a,~o,~so

~d~~' ~ CO~~ COG 4~~

~ ~~

Shanty Hollow LakeTSI = 58Eutrophic

0.8~ Mile

e~Gee ~

~~/~ ~~a~

~/i Da m

N

West Fork Drakes Creek ReservoirN Drinking Water Source Use

Simpson County

~. W F O~`~~~

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 ~'Mile~'" n

,- ~ 1// ..

C-25

Figure C-26:_Monitoring locations, trophi~c state index and general usesupport on Metcalfe County and Mill Creek lakes in theGreen Rive basin.

-~

n~ ,.__~ --~,_.

Dam\ Metcalfe County Lake

TSI = 64Eutrophic

~,,.

Metcalfe County

<~'U ,

~~~

N

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mile

~ Mill Creek Lake4 TSI = 52

~ Eutrophic

' _ ~~ ~~

/ r~~

Dam ~ Assessed Lakes)



Monroe County

----- Streams


~

~—

~; t-~.

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1Mile

C-26

Figure C-27: Monitoring locations, firophic state index and general usesupport on Liberty Lake and Lake Washburn in theGreen River~basin.

Dam \~

•

Casey County

Liberty LakeTSI = 42Mesotrophic

Ici

N~

n N0.8 ~ n~ Mile N

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

\,`Ci~k Cr~~k

Dam

•

Assessed Lakes)


Impaired for One or More Use----- Streams


~~__ _.._-., ~,.-

`'~ _ .~ __

Ohio County

Lake WashburnTSI = 55Eutrophic

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mile

C-27

Figure C-28: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Mauzy and Moffit lakes in the Tradewater Riverbasin and adjacent Ohio River minor tributaries.

DamHigginson Henry Wrldlife G~Management Area ~~~

G~

Mauzy LakeTSI = 56Eutrophic

r

l

r.~ .

Assessed Lakes) ~~~~Fully Supports Assessed Uses

Impaired for One or More Uses N

Selected Streams n• Sample Locations ~~~

Union County

~f.

So~G~e ~`~ ~ Dam

O~ ~`~, .~.

Motet LakeTSI = 53Eutrophic

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1Mile

C-28

Figure C-29: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Lake Peewee and Loch Mary in the TradewaterRiver basin.

1~`

NDam n

v ~ %Va

~~ v~ Lake PeeweeTSI = 53 ~ `~

G~~ Eutrophic

v

--~----- ~ LL - -~A. ~ ~ Madisonville

Assessed Lakes)


I mpaired for One or More Uses

--~- ~ Selected streams

8-Digit HUC


G\ea~ Greek

y

~~ Loch MaryTSI = 48Mesotrophic

Dam

Hopkins County

0 0.5 1 1.5 2Miles

C-29

~ -'--Figure 'C 30: Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general use

support on Lake Beshear and Pennyrile Lake in the TradewaterRiver basin.

HOPKINS COUNTY

CALDWELL COt

-o

m

C~mcod

i

am

Lake Beshear \~TSI = 53

~,

Eutrophic \

t ~ CHRISTIAN COUNTY

N~~- A.~~j....~

Assessed Lakes)


~~ Impaired for One or More Uses

;-'"` Selected streams

C] County

C, • Sample Locations

c~mm

Dam

Pennyrile LakeTSI = 49Mesotrophic

0 0.75 1.5 2.25 3Miles

C-30

Figure C-31:

oKedG~eek ''~.~ /

V~o `

Lake George(Marion City Lake)TSI = 54Eutrophic

Assessed Lakes)


Impaired far One or More Uses

-- - Selected streams


Monitoring locations, trophic state index and general usesupport on Lake George and Providence City Reservoir in theTradewater River basin and adjacent Ohio Riverminor tributaries.

Dam

Crittenden County

-,.~

Q 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Mile

C-31

,, -_i

~~ti~rtu~~UNBRIDLED SP1RlT

Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet

EPPC.KY.GOV

Documents

r ~es~L~.~~~~ i~ ~e~~~.~~1 - Kentucky Energy and

r ~es~L~.~~~~ i~ ~e~.1 - Kentucky Energy and