090 ict usage-survey-report-final-mon (1)

  • View
    153

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Text of 090 ict usage-survey-report-final-mon (1)

  • -

    , ,

    2009 1- 16

  • ii

    iv

    1: 1

    1.1. 1

    1.2. 2

    1.3. 4

    2: - , 5

    2.1. 5

    2.1.1. , , 5

    2.1.2. , , 7

    2.1.3. - , 10

    2.1.4. 13

    2.1.5. - 14

    2.2. 15

    2.2.1. 15

    2.2.2. 20

    2.2.3. 26

    2.2.4. 32

    2.3. 39

    2.3.1. 39

    2.3.2. 45

    2.3.3. 49

    2.3.4. 54

    2.3.5. 58

    2.4. 62

    2.4.1. 62

    2.4.2. , 74

    2.4.3. 80

    2.4.4. 87

  • iii

    2.4.5. , 93

    3. 100

    3.1. , 100

    3.2. , - 101

    3.3. 102

    1. 103

    2. 107

    3. 3.1 111

    4. 116

    5. - 118

  • iv

    - , , ()- , , () - (NIDA)- . - .

    - , , , .

    - , , -, , - , .

    - , , . - , , .

  • 1

    1.

    1.1.

    , , , , , .

    5 , , ()- . - , . - , , - , . - .

    , , , - , . - , , , , .

    , , .

    .

    - .

    - , , - .

    , ,

  • 2

    .

    , ()- , , - , - , - (NIDA)- .

    1.2.

    - , 2008 10-12 2008 10 . .

    /2008 9 / .

    36046 , 28000 .

    . .

    , , , , . 6 , -, , -, , , 6 , 6 12 .

    , -, 3 . 2 . .

    - , , , (Stratified Random Sampling)- .

  • 3

    5- (threshold)- . . (Newmans allocation)- . , . .

    1. - ,

    ,

    18799 895 557 529

    1989 143 109 107

    7212 507 254 244

    28000 1545 920 880

    . , - .

    2007 UNCTAD - - .

    880 , 3.14 . 167 // . .

    - / / . , , . .

  • 4

    -

    ,

    ,

    .

    1.3.

    - ,

    - . :

    1. . , - 2. . , - ,

    3. . , -

    .

    20 .

  • 5

    2. - ,

    2.1.

    2.1.1. , ,

    .

    GSM . .

    2008 10 61.4 . , .

    18.9 , 2.1 , 0.5 . 2 , , , 1- .

    1. ,

    2008 2009 2010

    61.4% 73.2% 84.3%

    18.9% 25.7% 32.0%

    2.1% 4.2% 6.8%

    0.5% 0.8% 1.7%

    0.0%

    10.0%

    20.0%

    30.0%

    40.0%

    50.0%

    60.0%

    70.0%

    80.0%

    90.0%

  • 6

    23 . , 2- .

    2.

    .

    1.

    (e-office)

    48.10%

    24.70%

    27.20%

    /

    46.90%

    33.30%

    19.80%

    , ,

    73.90%

    14.70%

    11.40%

    , 20 .

    22.2%

    34.0%

    38.6%

    0.0%

    5.0%

    10.0%

    15.0%

    20.0%

    25.0%

    30.0%

    35.0%

    40.0%

    45.0%

    2008 2009 2010

    ,

  • 7

    8.5 .

    2008 10

    9.0 ,

    34.5 ,

    49.5 ,

    71.0 .

    , - .

    2. - ,

    - 43% 35% 9% 13%

    33% 39% 9% 20%

    - , / /

    47% 21% 7% 25%

    41% 39% 8% 13%

    , . , .

    2.1.2. ,

    2008 36.6 . 91 9 . 1-9 .

  • 8

    2. , / /

    1. ,

    2009 , , .

    2009 , .

    3. 2008 //

    /1 / 384 kbps, 10 mbps .

    , .

    36.6%

    56.7%60.7%

    8.0%

    18.5%23.0%

    2008 2009 2010

    17.0%

    20.7%

    16.9%

    74.0%

    75.9%

    80.7%

    9.0%

    3.4%

    2.4%

    0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%

    2008

    2009

    2010

    14%

    39%15%

    30%

    2%

    dial-up ADSL

  • 9

    1.

    2008 2009 2010

    ( , )

    42.3% 51.5% 55.0%

    55.7% 64.8% 60.0%

    , , 85.2% 89.0% 89.3%

    - 5.1% 9.8% 12.7%

    2008 ,

    84%

    66%

    56%

    14%

    .

    2008 10 8.4 . ,

    100% , ,

    27% ,

    17%

    .

    40 . 2008 35.7 , , 48.4 , 63.0 .

    2008 .

    2.

    29.0% 50.0% 12.2% 8.8 %

    20.8% 46.5% 24.5% 8.2 %

    43.9% 34.7% 6.5% 14.9 %

  • 10

    .

    98% (Anti-virus, Anti-spyware Firewall, Spam-filter)

    18% (SSL,HTTPS)

    31% (, , .)

    34%

    .

    4. ,

    2.1.3. - ,

    2008 4.5 2009 .

    36%

    50%53%

    2008 2009 2010

  • 11

    1. - ,

    2008 / 92 , 8 91 , 9 . - .

    2008 - :

    2.9 % 1-4

    14.5 % 5-9

    30.4 % 10-49

    33.3 % 50-199

    18.8 % 200

    .

    2008 - :

    9.1 % 1-4

    13.6 % 5-9

    27.3 % 10-49

    25.0 % 50-199

    25.0 % 200

    .

    - 2008 - 2- .

    2008 2009 2010

    3.4%

    10.4%

    18.3%

    2.2%5.5%

    13.4%

    - -

  • 12

    2. -

    - - 1- 10 49 .

    2008 - -

    82

    68

    57

    .

    - 2008 - . 1. -

    22.6 % 44.0 % 15.5 % 17.9 %

    27.4 % 32.1 % 26.2 % 14.3 %

    ,

    25.0 % 34.5 % 14.3 % 26.2 %

    25.0 % 26.2 % 25.0 % 23.8 %

    -

    19.0 % 22.6 % 28.6 % 29.8 %

    25%7%

    49%

    46%

    20%

    39%

    6% 9%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    - -

    1- % 1- 10 %

    10- 50 % 50 %

  • 13

    , , , - .

    2.1.4.

    2008 9.7 .

    1. ,

    2009 2010 .

    88.6 , 11.4 .

    77.1 .

    ?

    42.3

    35.8

    17.4 ,

    48.8

    52.7

    . , .

    18.8 2008 , , .

    9.7%13.6%

    25.2%

    2008 2009 2010

  • 14

    1. - //

    2. 2008 - //

    2008 - 2009 2. .

    2. -

    2.1.5. -

    2008 33.5 - 44.8 - .

    9%

    14%17%

    37%

    2008 2009

    -

    -

    64%

    29%

    4% 2% 1%

    1 1-5 5-20

    20-50 50

    83%

    15%

    2% 0%0%

    1 1-10

    10-50 50-100

    100

  • 15

    2.2.

    2.2.1.

    - , .

    (-, )

    (-, ) 3 .

    , ,

    2008 , 1- .

    1.

    2008 24.1, 19.6, 1,0 .

    2 1- .

    0.0%

    20.0%

    40.0%

    60.0%

    80.0%

    100.0%

    120.0%

    2008 2009 2010

  • 16

    1. ,

    2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010

    56.1% 64.8% 69.9% 16.1% 23.3% 28.0% 4.9% 6.6% 10.2%

    34.6% 41.1% 45.8% 3.7% 4.7% 6.5% 1.9% 2.8% 3.7%

    4.9% 14.3% 20.1% 0.0% 0.8% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

    , , , .

    , , 2- . 2. ,

    , ,

    2008 , .

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    2008 2009 2010

  • 17

    3. ,

    2008 , .

    4. ,

    -

    2008 -

    .

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    2008 2009 2010

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    2008 2009 2010

  • 18

    5. 2008 -

    - , - , .

    2008 , 6- .

    6. - ,

    0.0%

    2.0%

    4.0%

    6.0%

    8.0%

    10.0%

    12.0%

    14.0%

    - -

    0.0%

    1