Videoécriture: interactive video vernaculars

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

These are the slides from a conference paper I delivered in Maastricht in 2002, well before YouTube, Vimeo et al. We're getting there, but most of what I was thinking about then is only just happening now.

Citation preview

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Adrian MilesInterMedia UiB (Norway)

RMIT (Australia)

vogmae@gmail.comhttp://vogmae.net.au2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

vogmae@gmail.com2002

Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive.

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive.

• it appropriates web browsers or clients as a de facto tv

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive.

• it appropriates web browsers or clients as a de facto tv

• looks backwards for a networked model

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive.

• it appropriates web or clients as de facto tv

• looks backwards for a networked model

• treats the network as broad or narrowcast where the model is middlecasting

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive.

• it appropriates web or clients as de facto tv

• looks backwards for a networked model

• treats the network as broad or narrowcast where the model is middlecasting

• interactivity must be within the video stream

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video

• recognises users constraints of time, bandwidth, screen

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video

• recognises users constraints of time, bandwidth, screen

• we are time poor - example of tv advertising

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video

• recognises users constraints of time, bandwidth, screen

• we are time poor - example of tv advertising

• we are bandwidth poor - instant broadband will not erase lack

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video

• recognises users constraints of time, bandwidth, screen

• we are time poor - example of tv advertising

• we are bandwidth poor - instant broadband will not erase lack

• we are screen poor and window rich - collage + montage

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm

• they assume temporally constrainedand delimited media (tape, film, broadcast)

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm

• they assume temporally constrainedand delimited media (tape, film, broadcast)

• this media has a fixed duration, it occupies time

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm

• they assume temporally constrainedand delimited media (tape, film, broadcast)

• this media has a fixed duration, it occupies time

• if the computer screen is the medium of publication (and interaction/consumption) this is no longer the case

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• yes, linking.

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• yes, linking.

• but wait . . .

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• yes, linking.

• but wait . . .

. . . there’s more

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• users own their desktops, including windows, applications and their qualities

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• users own their desktops, including windows, applications and their qualities

• works are open

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• users own their desktops, including windows, applications and their qualities

• works are open

• works are variable

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• users own their desktops, including windows, applications and their qualities

• works are open

• works are variable

• works are performative (not constative)

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• users own their desktops, including windows, applications and their qualities

• works are open

• works are variable

• works are performative (not constative)

• and can be ergodic

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Soft copy video is a different paradigm

• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext

• users own their desktops, including windows, applications and their qualities

• works are open

• works are variable

• works are performative (not constative)

• and can be ergodic

• are about vectors, events, relations vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts

• montage moves to a site between the author and thework

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts

• montage moves to a site between the author and thework

• montage moves to a site between the work and the user

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts

• montage moves to a site between the author and thework

• montage moves to a site between the work and the user

• video has a variable duration (user controlled variable looping)

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts

• montage moves to a site between the author and thework

• montage moves to a site between the work and the user

• video has a variable duration (user controlled variable looping)

• video has a possible open duration

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts

• montage moves to a site between the author and thework

• montage moves to a site between the work and the user

• video has a variable duration (user controlled variable looping)

• video has a possible open duration

• we now have relations between video panes

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

So what?

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

So what?

• this technology is distributed

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

So what?

• this technology is distributed

• is writerly

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

So what?

• this technology is distributed

• is writerly

• offers viable models to explore broadbandentertainment, documentary, fiction, and education

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

So what?

• this technology is distributed

• is writerly

• offers viable models to explore broadbandentertainment, documentary, fiction, and education

• is a vernacular which needs a grammaror rhetoric

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

So what?

• this technology is distributed

• is writerly

• offers viable models to explore broadbandentertainment, documentary, fiction, and education

• is a vernacular which needs a grammaror rhetoric

• is a vernacular that provides a grammaror rhetoric

vogmae@gmail.com2002

videocriture: interactive video vernaculars

http://vogmae.net.au

vogmae@gmail.com2002

Recommended