View
220
Download
3
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
UCB Corridor and Horner-Veasy
Focus Area Alternatives
City Council Meeting
Item VII.d
Tuesday June 14, 2016
We’re on a mission...
Community 2040 Vision
• Regional hub
• Strong economy
• Ethnic + diversity + culture
• Safe and healthy neighborhoods
• Valued education
• Expanded recreation
• Effective and efficient public services
Community Guiding Principles
• Economic Development
• Health and Quality of Life
• Land Use and Community Design
• Housing
• Mobility and access
• Sustainability and Resiliency
• Parks and Recreation
• Public Safety
• Services and Facilities
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 3
General Plan Update Schedule
Project Initiation…………………… Complete
Background Report………………… Complete
Issues, Opportunities, and Vision….. Complete
Land Use Alternatives.......................Fall 2015 - Summer 2016
General Plan Policies………...………Summer 2016-Fall 2016
Environmental Review…………....…Fall 2016-Winter 2017
Plan Adoption…………………….… Spring 2017
SPRING
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 4
Alternatives Report and Newsletter
• Focus Area
Alternatives
• Citywide
Alternatives
• Evaluation and
comparison
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 6
Publicity and Advertising
• e-Blasts
• Newspaper Notices
• Meeting Flyers
• www.uc2040.com
www.uc2040.com
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 7
How we gathered input...• Alternatives Newsletter/Worksheet Mail-In
• Online Townhall Forum
• Community workshops
• Community group/stakeholder meetings
• Open houses
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 8
Public Input Summary
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 9
Provides overview of public input received during the Alternatives phase
Focus Areas
Greater
Station
DistrictHorner-Veasy Area
Union City
Boulevard
Corridor
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 12
Union City Boulevard Alternatives
A B
C1 DC2
2002 General Plan
(Light Industrial)
Light Industrial and
Lower-Density Residential
Medium-High Density
Residential
Retail Commercial and
Mixed UseLight Industrial, Retail Commercial,
and Medium-High Density Residential
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 13
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 14
Lincoln-Alvarado Business Park
Crossroads Technology Park
Kohoutek Area / Clock Tower Commerce Center
FOCUS AREA
SFR
SFR
KAISER
UCB: Alternative A – Existing GP
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 16
Considerations• Low opportunity cost• Improves jobs/housing balance• Provides closest match of new job types to existing
labor force • Provides mostly industrial jobs and the greatest
opportunity to meet city’s employment demands• Provide jobs that pay a living wage• Has the lowest fiscal benefit• Creates the fewest additional peak hour trips• Has the potential to generate fewer outbound trips• Accommodates existing uses and does not result in
land use conflicts with Lincoln-Alvarado Business Park to the West
00348
Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 17
UCB: Alternative B
East Side Residential
965370114
Considerations• Maintains existing GP designation on West side of
UCB that is supportive of existing uses• Provides a good match of new job types to
existing labor force • Worsens jobs/housing balance due to more
housing being added than jobs• Would provide some jobs that pay a living wage • Has a relatively low fiscal benefit• Has potential to generate fewer outbound trips• Supportive of existing uses and minimizes land use
conflicts with existing business park to the West and SFR to the East
Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 18
UCB: Alternative C1
East-Side Commercial / Residential
521218487
Considerations• Provides opportunity to address the city’s
retail leakage• Second highest fiscal benefit • Improves jobs/housing balance • Supportive of existing uses and minimizes
land use conflicts• Likely create more walking/biking
opportunities
Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 19
UCB: Alternative C2 – Commercial / Mixed Use
4081711,536
Considerations• Provides best opportunity to address the city’s
retail leakage• Has the highest fiscal benefit• Has highest job creation but majority of jobs
below living wage• Improves jobs/housing balance • Would likely create more walking/biking
opportunities• Minimizes land use conflicts • More traffic congestion
Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 20
UCB: Alternative D -Residential
2,040815-319
Considerations• High opportunity cost• Help meet city’s future residential demands• Most opportunity for affordable housing• Loss of jobs due to loss of employment-
generating land uses• Lowers jobs/housing balance• Relatively low fiscal benefit• Creates more parkland and walking/biking
opportunities• Potential for land use conflicts with business park
to the West
Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 22
Fiscal Summary
A L T D
A L T C 2
A L T C 1
A L T B
A L T A
$7,028,560
$1,474,704
$1,880,032
$3,407,300
Capital Facilities Fee*
* No operations and maintenance expenses
Union City Boulevard Alternatives
A B
C1 DC2
2002 General Plan
(Light Industrial)
Light Industrial and
Lower-Density Residential
Medium-High Density
Residential
Retail Commercial and
Mixed UseLight Industrial, Retail Commercial,
and Medium-High Density Residential
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 26
A B C
D1 D2Union Sanitary District Facility
Expansion Option 1
Union Sanitary District Facility
Expansion Option 2
2002 General Plan
(Light Industrial)
Lower-Density Residential and
Open SpaceOpen Space, Light Industrial, and
Low Density Residential
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 27
Horner-Veasy Alternatives
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 30
HVA: Alternative A
2002 General Plan00180
Points of Consideration• Provides greatest opportunity to meet
city’s employment demands• Provides greatest opportunity to meet
city’s job/housing ratio• Generates flex-industrial jobs, which
pay a living wage• Creates little fiscal impact• Generates fewer trips than residential
uses• Adds relatively few additional peak
hour trips compared to today• Not conducive to walkability or
bikeability
Theme:Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
HVA: Alternative B
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 31
Residential1,084431-14
Points of Consideration• Would lose jobs due to loss of
employment-generating land uses• Would help meet city’s future residential
demands• Would lower jobs/housing ratio• Provides some multifamily housing, which
has greatest potential to be affordable• Creates little fiscal impact• Results in more net trips due to
residential land uses • Results in the greatest increase in total
VMT• Greatest relatively opportunity to
promote walkability and bikeability
Theme:Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 32
HVA: Alternative C
Residential/Light Industrial15441181
Points of Consideration• Would generate flex-industrial jobs, which
pay a living wage• Potentially improves the jobs/housing
balance• Does not provide opportunity for
affordable housing• Creates little fiscal impact• Generates relatively few additional total
trips• Creates relatively few additional peak
hour trips compared to today• Not conducive to walkability or bikeability
Theme:Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 33
HVA: Alternative D1
Union Sanitary Expansion Option9224182
Points of Consideration• USD would create office and industrial
type jobs, which would pay a living wage• Provides opportunity to improve
jobs/housing balance• Does not provide opportunity for
affordable housing due to low-density designation
• Creates little fiscal impact• Generates limited new trips because of
USD expansion• Not conducive to walkability or
bikeability
Theme:
Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 34
HVA: Alternative D2
Union Sanitary Expansion – City Option9224199
Points of Consideration• Similar to Alternative D2• Locates the USD expansion in the
western half• Provides better opportunity to develop
light industrial uses adjacent to Whipple Road
Theme:
Net New Population:Net New Housing:Net New Jobs:
City Council Meeting | June 14, 2016 | 36
Summary of HVA Indicators
A L T D 2
A L T D 1
A L T C
A L T B
A L T A
$293,544
$293,544
$501,471
$3,864,831
0
Capital Facilities Fee*
* No operations and maintenance expenses
Recommended