STRUCTURAL ANATOMY OF BUILDINGS - DRPILLA · 2016. 10. 5. · sTRuCTuRaL aNaTomY oF BuiLDiNGs...

Preview:

Citation preview

The City College of New York Bernard and Anne Spitzer School of Architecture

STRUCTURAL ANATOMY OF BUILDINGS

PROFESSOR DOMINICK R. PILLAStudent Work I Spring 2015

STRU

CTU

RA

L AN

ATO

MY

OF B

UILD

ING

S The City C

ollege of New

York Bernard and Anne Spitzer School of A

rchitecture PR

OFESSO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. PILLA

Student Work I Spring 2

015

32

PR

EC

ED

EN

T

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

ST

UD

EN

T N

AM

ES

COURSE DESCRIPTIONThis course will offer students a foundation and familiarity with the use of structural systems through various case studies and examples. Each case study will be presented holistically and then deconstructed and analyzed to determine structural systems used and the reasoning behind the selection. Through structural investigation, students will peel away the design and actively calculate loads and forces while discussing the possibility of modifying existing structures.

The course allows the student to immerse in a built example and imagine the evolution of the design and consider the effectiveness of the system as it pertains to the architectural design constraints and other building systems.

Students (teams) will be exposed to a lecture and seminar/analysis period to deconstruct their chosen building based on the lecture’s focus. The intent is to have the student dissect/deconstruct the building to understand the design constraints and forces, which influence the structural design to give the student a holistic understanding of structural systems at work.

SPRING 2015 STUDENTSNagi Alamri, Christina Bien-Aime, Berk Eraslan, Jennifer Ewald, Sunny Fok, Sarah Holtzer, Cheuk Kei Hui, Peiying Jiang, Xiao Yi Lin, Andy Liu, Katerina Marcelja, Ronald Martin, Nicole Montenegro, Sino Mukhitdinov, Dmitriy Polyakov, Nelya Sachakova, Toar Sadia, Renee Thomas, Shereese Trumpet, Lyubov Tsinis, Julian Usman,Young Do Yoo.

TABLE OF CONTENTSPRECEDENT 04STRUCTURAL FORM STUDY 14KEY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS 38STRUCTURAL VIGNETTES 82

54

PR

EC

ED

EN

T

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

ST

UD

EN

T N

AM

ES

Precedent assignment: Students, in groups of two, are assigned abuilding as the subject of their project. The students are requiredto investigate and research the structural system of the building.Their investigation should discuss the influence of the location,use/function and aesthetic design of the building under studywhen determining the structural design system selected. That is, buildings in a high wind or high seismic region will be subject to higher lateral loadings and certain systems function better than others. Also the use and function of the building, such as a school, hospital or library, often require column free areas, which will influence the structural system selected – this should be discussed. In addition, the structural system will often determine the materials of the building such as a concrete, steel, masonry or combination thereof.

PRECEDENT

6

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

7

PR

EC

ED

EN

TC

hR

isT

iNa

BiE

N-a

imE

+ T

oa

R s

aD

ia +

sh

ER

EE

sE

TR

um

PE

T

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

ARCHITECT Eero SaarinenSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER Fred N. SeverudLOCATION 73 Sachem Street, New Haven, CTYEAR 1953-1958BUDGET $750,00.00

CASE STUDY INGALLS RINK

98

PR

EC

ED

EN

T

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

aN

aT

om

Y o

F B

uiL

DiN

Gs

PR

oF

Es

so

R D

om

iNiC

K R

. P

iLL

a

Ch

Ris

TiN

a B

iEN

-aim

E +

To

aR

sa

Dia

+ s

hE

RE

Es

E T

Ru

mP

ET

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

Ingalls Rink

Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet

Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation

Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram

Construction Section

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Tension and Compression Diagrams

Deflection Scenarios

10

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

11

PR

EC

ED

EN

TB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

ARCHITECTS OMAENGINEERS ARUPSPACE 51 Million SFMAXIMUM HEIGHT 768 FTTOTAL LEVELS 31 StoriesYEAR COMPLETED 2012

CASE STUDY CCTV HEADQUARTERS

12

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

13

PR

EC

ED

EN

TB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

1514

PR

EC

ED

EN

T

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

ST

UD

EN

T N

AM

ES

Students, in groups of two create building forms (models) to study and examine the principles of repetitive structural forms such as Hyperbolic Paraboloids (HyPar), domes, vaults, shells, torus etc.

By experimenting with these forms, the student better grasps the load paths and can explore form finding of structural shapes and development of structural modules.

STRUCTURAL FORMSTUDY

16

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

17

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

YJu

Lia

N u

sm

aN

+ C

hE

uK

KE

i h

ui

18

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

19

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

YN

iCo

LE

mo

NT

EN

EG

Ro

+ Y

ou

NG

Do

Yo

o

20

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

21

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

YB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

22

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

23

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

YC

hR

isT

iNa

BiE

N-a

imE

2524

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

Y

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

aN

aT

om

Y o

F B

uiL

DiN

Gs

PR

oF

Es

so

R D

om

iNiC

K R

. P

iLL

a

Na

Gi

aL

am

Ri

+ R

oN

aL

D m

aR

TiN

+ N

ELY

a s

aC

ha

Ko

va

26

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

27

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

YN

aG

i a

La

mR

i +

Ro

Na

LD

ma

RT

iN +

NE

LYa

sa

Ch

aK

ov

a

2928

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

Y

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

aN

aT

om

Y o

F B

uiL

DiN

Gs

PR

oF

Es

so

R D

om

iNiC

K R

. P

iLL

a

sa

Ra

h h

oLT

zE

R +

Ka

TE

RiN

a m

aR

CE

LJa

30

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

31

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

YT

oa

R s

aD

ia

32

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

33

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

YX

iao

Yi

LiN

+ R

EN

EE

Th

om

as

34

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

35

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

Ys

iNo

mu

Kh

iTD

iNo

v

36

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

37

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

Fo

Rm

sT

uD

Ys

uN

NY

Fo

K +

aN

DY

Liu

+ D

miT

RiY

Po

LYa

Ko

v

3938

PR

EC

ED

EN

T

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

ST

UD

EN

T N

AM

ES

Students returning back to their precedent building studies or an acceptable alternate are to dissect the building system and discuss key structural components by creating diagram studies of the assemblies illustrating the structural composition and load path of the system.

KEY STRUCTURALELEMENTS

40

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

41

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

42

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

43

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

44

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

45

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

ss

aR

ah

ho

LTz

ER

+ K

aT

ER

iNa

ma

RC

EL

Ja

46

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

47

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sL

EF

T:

sa

Ra

h +

Ka

TE

RiN

a |

RiG

hT

: C

hR

isT

iNa

+ T

oa

R +

sh

ER

EE

sE

48

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

49

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sC

hR

isT

iNa

BiE

N-a

imE

+ T

oa

R s

aD

ia +

sh

ER

EE

sE

TR

um

PE

T

50

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

51

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sL

EF

T :

Ch

Ris

TiN

a +

To

aR

+ s

hE

RE

Es

E |

RiG

hT

: N

iCo

LE

+ Y

ou

NG

Do

52

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

53

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sL

EF

T:

Na

Gi

+ R

oN

aL

D +

NE

LYa

| R

iGh

T:

NiC

oL

E +

Yo

uN

G D

o

54

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

55

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sN

aG

i a

La

mR

i +

Ro

Na

LD

ma

RT

iN +

NE

LYa

sa

Ch

aK

ov

a

56

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

57

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

+ T

oa

R s

aD

ia

58

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

59

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

60

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

61

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sB

ER

K E

Ra

sL

aN

+ P

EiY

iNG

Jia

NG

62

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

63

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sL

EF

T:

BE

RK

+ P

EiY

iNG

| R

iGh

T:

Na

Gi

+ R

oN

aL

D +

NE

LYa

64

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

65

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sN

aG

i a

La

mR

i +

Ro

Na

LD

ma

RT

iN +

NE

LYa

sa

Ch

aK

ov

a

66

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

67

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sN

aG

i a

La

mR

i +

Ro

Na

LD

ma

RT

iN +

NE

LYa

sa

Ch

aK

ov

a

68

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

69

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

ss

aR

ah

ho

LTz

ER

+ K

aT

ER

iNa

ma

RC

EL

Ja

70

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

71

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

ss

aR

ah

ho

LTz

ER

+ K

aT

ER

iNa

ma

RC

EL

Ja

72

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

73

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

ss

aR

ah

ho

LTz

ER

+ K

aT

ER

iNa

ma

RC

EL

Ja

74

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

75

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sY

ou

NG

Do

Yo

o +

NiC

oL

E m

oN

TE

NE

GR

o

76

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

77

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sL

EF

T:

NiC

oL

E +

Yo

uN

G D

o |

RiG

hT

: C

hR

isT

iNa

+ T

oa

R +

sh

ER

EE

sE

78

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

79

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sC

hR

isT

iNa

BiE

N-a

imE

+ T

oa

R s

aD

ia +

sh

ER

EE

sE

TR

um

PE

T

80

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

81

KE

Y s

TR

uC

Tu

Ra

L E

LE

mE

NT

sL

EF

T:

BE

RK

+ P

EiY

iNG

|

RiG

hT

: N

aG

i +

Ro

Na

LD

+ N

ELY

a ,

NiC

oL

E +

Yo

uN

G D

o

8382

PR

EC

ED

EN

T

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

ST

UD

EN

T N

AM

ES

Students are given construction documents of several buildings. Focusing on areas of interface between structural system and the building shells, the students are required to create a variety of assembly vignettes which best describe the essential structural concepts.

STRUCTURALVIGNETTES

84

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

85

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

viG

NE

TT

Es

Na

Gi

aL

am

Ri

+ R

oN

aL

D m

aR

TiN

+ N

ELY

a s

aC

ha

Ko

va

86

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

87

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

viG

NE

TT

Es

Ch

Ris

TiN

a B

iEN

-aim

E +

To

aR

sa

Dia

+ s

hE

RE

Es

E T

Ru

mP

ET

88

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

89

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

viG

NE

TT

Es

NiC

oL

E m

oN

TE

NE

GR

o +

Yo

uN

G D

o Y

oo

90

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

91

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

viG

NE

TT

Es

sa

Ra

h h

oLT

zE

R +

Ka

TE

RiN

a m

aR

CE

LJa

92

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

AN

AT

OM

Y O

F B

UIL

DIN

GS

PR

OF

ES

SO

R D

OM

INIC

K R

. P

ILL

A

93

sT

Ru

CT

uR

aL

viG

NE

TT

Es

BE

RK

ER

as

La

N +

PE

iYiN

G J

iaN

G

Recommended