Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The City College of New York Bernard and Anne Spitzer School of Architecture
STRUCTURAL ANATOMY OF BUILDINGS
PROFESSOR DOMINICK R. PILLAStudent Work I Spring 2015
STRU
CTU
RA
L AN
ATO
MY
OF B
UILD
ING
S The City C
ollege of New
York Bernard and Anne Spitzer School of A
rchitecture PR
OFESSO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. PILLA
Student Work I Spring 2
015
32
PR
EC
ED
EN
T
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
ST
UD
EN
T N
AM
ES
COURSE DESCRIPTIONThis course will offer students a foundation and familiarity with the use of structural systems through various case studies and examples. Each case study will be presented holistically and then deconstructed and analyzed to determine structural systems used and the reasoning behind the selection. Through structural investigation, students will peel away the design and actively calculate loads and forces while discussing the possibility of modifying existing structures.
The course allows the student to immerse in a built example and imagine the evolution of the design and consider the effectiveness of the system as it pertains to the architectural design constraints and other building systems.
Students (teams) will be exposed to a lecture and seminar/analysis period to deconstruct their chosen building based on the lecture’s focus. The intent is to have the student dissect/deconstruct the building to understand the design constraints and forces, which influence the structural design to give the student a holistic understanding of structural systems at work.
SPRING 2015 STUDENTSNagi Alamri, Christina Bien-Aime, Berk Eraslan, Jennifer Ewald, Sunny Fok, Sarah Holtzer, Cheuk Kei Hui, Peiying Jiang, Xiao Yi Lin, Andy Liu, Katerina Marcelja, Ronald Martin, Nicole Montenegro, Sino Mukhitdinov, Dmitriy Polyakov, Nelya Sachakova, Toar Sadia, Renee Thomas, Shereese Trumpet, Lyubov Tsinis, Julian Usman,Young Do Yoo.
TABLE OF CONTENTSPRECEDENT 04STRUCTURAL FORM STUDY 14KEY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS 38STRUCTURAL VIGNETTES 82
54
PR
EC
ED
EN
T
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
ST
UD
EN
T N
AM
ES
Precedent assignment: Students, in groups of two, are assigned abuilding as the subject of their project. The students are requiredto investigate and research the structural system of the building.Their investigation should discuss the influence of the location,use/function and aesthetic design of the building under studywhen determining the structural design system selected. That is, buildings in a high wind or high seismic region will be subject to higher lateral loadings and certain systems function better than others. Also the use and function of the building, such as a school, hospital or library, often require column free areas, which will influence the structural system selected – this should be discussed. In addition, the structural system will often determine the materials of the building such as a concrete, steel, masonry or combination thereof.
PRECEDENT
6
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
7
PR
EC
ED
EN
TC
hR
isT
iNa
BiE
N-a
imE
+ T
oa
R s
aD
ia +
sh
ER
EE
sE
TR
um
PE
T
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
ARCHITECT Eero SaarinenSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER Fred N. SeverudLOCATION 73 Sachem Street, New Haven, CTYEAR 1953-1958BUDGET $750,00.00
CASE STUDY INGALLS RINK
98
PR
EC
ED
EN
T
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
aN
aT
om
Y o
F B
uiL
DiN
Gs
PR
oF
Es
so
R D
om
iNiC
K R
. P
iLL
a
Ch
Ris
TiN
a B
iEN
-aim
E +
To
aR
sa
Dia
+ s
hE
RE
Es
E T
Ru
mP
ET
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
Ingalls Rink
Christina Bien-Aime, Toar Sadia, Shereese Trumpet
Architect: Eero SaarinenStructural Engineer: Fred N. SeverudLocation: 73 Sachem St. New Haven, ConnecticutYear: 1953-1958Budget: $750,000Construction Cost: $1,500,000Dimensions: 335 ft long x 196 ft wide x 75 ft highFootprint: 47,983 sfGross Square Footage: 61,646 sfCapacity: 3,500 peopleEntrance Elevation
Aerial View Interior View Material Diagram
Construction Section
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Tension and Compression Diagrams
Deflection Scenarios
10
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
11
PR
EC
ED
EN
TB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
ARCHITECTS OMAENGINEERS ARUPSPACE 51 Million SFMAXIMUM HEIGHT 768 FTTOTAL LEVELS 31 StoriesYEAR COMPLETED 2012
CASE STUDY CCTV HEADQUARTERS
12
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
13
PR
EC
ED
EN
TB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
1514
PR
EC
ED
EN
T
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
ST
UD
EN
T N
AM
ES
Students, in groups of two create building forms (models) to study and examine the principles of repetitive structural forms such as Hyperbolic Paraboloids (HyPar), domes, vaults, shells, torus etc.
By experimenting with these forms, the student better grasps the load paths and can explore form finding of structural shapes and development of structural modules.
STRUCTURAL FORMSTUDY
16
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
17
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
YJu
Lia
N u
sm
aN
+ C
hE
uK
KE
i h
ui
18
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
19
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
YN
iCo
LE
mo
NT
EN
EG
Ro
+ Y
ou
NG
Do
Yo
o
20
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
21
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
YB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
22
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
23
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
YC
hR
isT
iNa
BiE
N-a
imE
2524
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
Y
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
aN
aT
om
Y o
F B
uiL
DiN
Gs
PR
oF
Es
so
R D
om
iNiC
K R
. P
iLL
a
Na
Gi
aL
am
Ri
+ R
oN
aL
D m
aR
TiN
+ N
ELY
a s
aC
ha
Ko
va
26
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
27
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
YN
aG
i a
La
mR
i +
Ro
Na
LD
ma
RT
iN +
NE
LYa
sa
Ch
aK
ov
a
2928
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
Y
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
aN
aT
om
Y o
F B
uiL
DiN
Gs
PR
oF
Es
so
R D
om
iNiC
K R
. P
iLL
a
sa
Ra
h h
oLT
zE
R +
Ka
TE
RiN
a m
aR
CE
LJa
30
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
31
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
YT
oa
R s
aD
ia
32
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
33
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
YX
iao
Yi
LiN
+ R
EN
EE
Th
om
as
34
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
35
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
Ys
iNo
mu
Kh
iTD
iNo
v
36
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
37
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
Fo
Rm
sT
uD
Ys
uN
NY
Fo
K +
aN
DY
Liu
+ D
miT
RiY
Po
LYa
Ko
v
3938
PR
EC
ED
EN
T
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
ST
UD
EN
T N
AM
ES
Students returning back to their precedent building studies or an acceptable alternate are to dissect the building system and discuss key structural components by creating diagram studies of the assemblies illustrating the structural composition and load path of the system.
KEY STRUCTURALELEMENTS
40
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
41
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
42
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
43
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
44
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
45
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
ss
aR
ah
ho
LTz
ER
+ K
aT
ER
iNa
ma
RC
EL
Ja
46
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
47
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sL
EF
T:
sa
Ra
h +
Ka
TE
RiN
a |
RiG
hT
: C
hR
isT
iNa
+ T
oa
R +
sh
ER
EE
sE
48
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
49
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sC
hR
isT
iNa
BiE
N-a
imE
+ T
oa
R s
aD
ia +
sh
ER
EE
sE
TR
um
PE
T
50
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
51
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sL
EF
T :
Ch
Ris
TiN
a +
To
aR
+ s
hE
RE
Es
E |
RiG
hT
: N
iCo
LE
+ Y
ou
NG
Do
52
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
53
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sL
EF
T:
Na
Gi
+ R
oN
aL
D +
NE
LYa
| R
iGh
T:
NiC
oL
E +
Yo
uN
G D
o
54
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
55
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sN
aG
i a
La
mR
i +
Ro
Na
LD
ma
RT
iN +
NE
LYa
sa
Ch
aK
ov
a
56
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
57
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
+ T
oa
R s
aD
ia
58
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
59
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
60
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
61
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sB
ER
K E
Ra
sL
aN
+ P
EiY
iNG
Jia
NG
62
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
63
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sL
EF
T:
BE
RK
+ P
EiY
iNG
| R
iGh
T:
Na
Gi
+ R
oN
aL
D +
NE
LYa
64
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
65
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sN
aG
i a
La
mR
i +
Ro
Na
LD
ma
RT
iN +
NE
LYa
sa
Ch
aK
ov
a
66
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
67
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sN
aG
i a
La
mR
i +
Ro
Na
LD
ma
RT
iN +
NE
LYa
sa
Ch
aK
ov
a
68
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
69
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
ss
aR
ah
ho
LTz
ER
+ K
aT
ER
iNa
ma
RC
EL
Ja
70
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
71
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
ss
aR
ah
ho
LTz
ER
+ K
aT
ER
iNa
ma
RC
EL
Ja
72
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
73
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
ss
aR
ah
ho
LTz
ER
+ K
aT
ER
iNa
ma
RC
EL
Ja
74
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
75
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sY
ou
NG
Do
Yo
o +
NiC
oL
E m
oN
TE
NE
GR
o
76
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
77
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sL
EF
T:
NiC
oL
E +
Yo
uN
G D
o |
RiG
hT
: C
hR
isT
iNa
+ T
oa
R +
sh
ER
EE
sE
78
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
79
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sC
hR
isT
iNa
BiE
N-a
imE
+ T
oa
R s
aD
ia +
sh
ER
EE
sE
TR
um
PE
T
80
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
81
KE
Y s
TR
uC
Tu
Ra
L E
LE
mE
NT
sL
EF
T:
BE
RK
+ P
EiY
iNG
|
RiG
hT
: N
aG
i +
Ro
Na
LD
+ N
ELY
a ,
NiC
oL
E +
Yo
uN
G D
o
8382
PR
EC
ED
EN
T
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
ST
UD
EN
T N
AM
ES
Students are given construction documents of several buildings. Focusing on areas of interface between structural system and the building shells, the students are required to create a variety of assembly vignettes which best describe the essential structural concepts.
STRUCTURALVIGNETTES
84
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
85
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
viG
NE
TT
Es
Na
Gi
aL
am
Ri
+ R
oN
aL
D m
aR
TiN
+ N
ELY
a s
aC
ha
Ko
va
86
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
87
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
viG
NE
TT
Es
Ch
Ris
TiN
a B
iEN
-aim
E +
To
aR
sa
Dia
+ s
hE
RE
Es
E T
Ru
mP
ET
88
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
89
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
viG
NE
TT
Es
NiC
oL
E m
oN
TE
NE
GR
o +
Yo
uN
G D
o Y
oo
90
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
91
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
viG
NE
TT
Es
sa
Ra
h h
oLT
zE
R +
Ka
TE
RiN
a m
aR
CE
LJa
92
ST
RU
CT
UR
AL
AN
AT
OM
Y O
F B
UIL
DIN
GS
PR
OF
ES
SO
R D
OM
INIC
K R
. P
ILL
A
93
sT
Ru
CT
uR
aL
viG
NE
TT
Es
BE
RK
ER
as
La
N +
PE
iYiN
G J
iaN
G