View
212
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Poster Session
such example is damage to the globe requiring enucle-
ation. Reconstruction of these injuries with prosthesescan be complex and requires a multidisciplinary
approach often involving Ophthalmology, Occuloplas-
tics, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Maxillofacial
Prosthodontics. In the Wounded Warrior population,
one complication we have encountered is the loss of
orbital and facial volume that compromises the support
for a globe prosthesis as well as the cosmetic outcome.
Our group has overcome this challenge utilizing autolo-gous fat transplantation.
Methods: A case review was completed following
multispecialty intervention in the case of a traumatic
globe injury resulting in loss of the globe. Specialties/
Subspecialties in the collaborative effort include Ophthal-
mology, Occuloplastic, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics. Data analyzed included
mode of injury, amount of fat transferred, number of pro-cedures and a review of complications. The following
Wounded Warrior was treated at Walter Reed National
Military Medical Center in Bethesda, MD.
Results: One Wounded Warrior underwent two autol-
ogous lipotransfers to the periorbital region following
initial healing from his enucleation. Orbital architecture
and overall facial volume were successfully improved
via autologous lipotransfer to the periorbital, infraorbitaland nasolabial regions. The patient had objective
improvement of prosthesis fit as well as subjective
improvement in overall cosmesis. There were no signifi-
cant complications to report from the procedures.
Conclusions: Autologous fat grafting has proven to be
effective in the treatment of scars by clinically improving
contour deformities, softening texture and adapting hue
to the uninjured adjacent skin. Adipose tissue can be anabundant source of pluripotent stem cells. Fat transfer
can be designed to recontour scars, soften and reduce hy-
pertrophic deformities such as induration, involutions,
and deep furrow, and as in this report, treat an orbit
with periorbital hollowing. This case presents a multidis-
ciplinary approach to the restoration of the periorbital
region after orbital enucleation, utilizing an ocular pros-
thesis and lipotransfer.
References:
1. Thach AB, Johnson AJ, Carroll RB, et al. Severe eye injuries in the
war in Iraq, 2003–2005. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:377–382.
2. Cetinkaya A, Devoto MH. Periocular fat grafting: indications and
techniques. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24(5):494-9.
POSTER 262Retrospective Clinical Analysis of DoubleFree-Flap Reconstruction of maxillofacialdefect
K. Sung: School of Dentistry, Seoul National University,
J. Ho Lee, M. J. Kim, M. Hoon, S. KIM
AAOMS � 2014
Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze
the result of double free-flap reconstruction cases retro-spectively.
Patients and Methods: A total of 23 patients under-
went double free-flap reconstruction between 1999 to
2014 at Seoul National University Dental Hospital
(SNUDH). There were 13 men and 10 women. We exam-
ined Primary pathology, donor site of free flap, type of pri-
mary/secondary reconstruction, success rate, follow-up
period, operate time.Results: Patient age ranged from14 to 76withmean age
of 50 years, andmean post operative follow-up period was
56.1 months. Most common primary pathology was squa-
mous cell carcinoma (56.5%), followed by adenoid cystic
carcinoma (13.0%). 34.8% of the patients received radial
forearm free flap for reconstruction while 26.1% and
23.9% of patients received latissimus dorsi free flap and
fibular free flap, respectively. Remaining patients receivedserratus anterior free flap (8.7%) and rectus abdominis free
flap (6.5%). The most frequently used combination of free
flapswas that of radial forearm free flap and fibular free flap
(21.7%), followed by combination of latissimus dorsi free
flap and radial forearm free flap(17.4%) and combination
of latissimus dorsi free flap and fibular free flap(17.4%).
Among the 23cases included in this study, 19were primary
reconstruction and 4 were secondary reconstruction. Themean operation time was 15 hours. Local complications
included dehiscence (8 cases) and infection (1 case). Suc-
cess rate of double free-flap was about 91%.
Conclusion: Patients who had extensive defects after
ablation have no optional solution. Double free-flaps
reconstruction was a good alternative if single free-flaps
are not applicable. Double free-flaps were an indication
in case of composite tissue requirement.
References:
1. Andrades P, Bohannon IA, Baranano CF, Wax MK, Rosenthal E. In-
dications and outcomes of double free flaps in head and neck recon-
struction. Microsurgery 2009;29:171–177.
2. Kalavrezos N, Bhandari R. Current trends and future perspectives in
the surgical management of oral cancer. Oral Oncol 2010;46:429–432.
POSTER 2630steogenic potential of the osteogenicmatrix cell sheets in maxillofacialregeneration
Y. Ueyama: Nara Medical University, T. Yagyuu, M. Maeda,
T. Kirita
Regenerationofmaxillofacial bonedefects suchasmaxil-
lary alveolar clefts and bone resorption resulting frommar-ginal periodontitis pose a significant clinical challenge. We
focused on the new cell transplantation technique in
which bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells
(BMSCs) were cultured as cell sheets with osteogenic
e-199
Recommended