After Action Review F2F Cuzco Core Group CCE Network

+ Positive +• Majority of things went well• 1st time Network entered more deeply into thematic issues• 2 common reference experiences (field visits) that motivate(d) the

discussions• Good working team in Bern – very good counterparts in Peru• A good harvest that justifies the investment of time – not only for the

Network, it has and will also have a good effect on the work of SDC in Peru• NW has grown out of a larva stage – mostly for f2f participants• High level of interest & engagement in social reporting – supported by

strong technical backstoppers• Good timing to wait for f2f (eg. CC &DRR Check, progress of rather new

EELA and PACC projects in Peru)• Open Space worked well for Network development

After Action Review F2F Cuzco Core Group CCE Network

- Negative -

• There could have been more GPCC participation in thoughts on network development and thematic discussions

• We need to convince Africa and Asia members to participate more intensively

• Network ownership at COOF and division level needs to grow• More NPOs are good for the peer exchange• Language issues – some reduced participation, but for a global face to

face English is the only option

After Action Review F2F Cuzco Core Group CCE Network

Next steps

• Need to give management a good debriefing• Develop concrete requests to management out of this workshop (e.g. Co-

Focal Point and working group related resources)• Steering resp. core group meeting on DRR & CC Interaction• Steering resp. core group members become key stakeholders of the

network