Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Originally this was made as a Mac Keynote presentation - I am not sure how it will work or look in PPT, but if you are interested in Web2.0 and Web3.0 trends perhaps this will be of some help.
Citation preview
web 2.0
quick history lesson: #1
quick history* lesson: #2A survey was conducted with teens regarding what they thought has become passe in their lifetimes:
"I used to use Instant Messenger,but now I mostly use Facebook to communicate with people. I use e-mail for, like, reaching my coaches or uncles -- older people. Otherwise it's either my cellphone or Facebook." -- Emily Siegel, 16, Alexandria
"Dictionaries and encyclopedias. They've been replaced with Google, Wikipedia and online dictionaries. It's been years since I looked at the dictionary or encyclopedia on my family's bookshelf." -- Vidya Srinivasan, 13, Chevy Chase
"In elementary school we had chalkboards in every single room, but now teachers all use boards that are connected to the computer." --Emma Fensterheim, 13, Bethesda
"We had an old Saturn, and you had to crank something to open the window. I only remember that in one car. It was fun to play with, but I never got the window open." -- Ariana Steel, 13, Washington
rationale
“They have never known a world without eBay, Amazon, or Google,” he added. “They assume that when you create a piece of software it will be Internet-connected and it will have an innate sense of who your friends are.”
In three weeks of February, the Barack Obama entry in Wikipedia had almost 2 million views and was the seventh most visited (and, really, second most visited in terms of content) article on the site.* John McCain’s had 1.1 million. Hillary Clinton, who apparently more people “know” about, had about 422,000. In those same three weeks, the Wikipedia home page got over 140 million views. The point? People are turning to Wikipedia in large numbers to learn about the topics that are of interest and importance to them. Many of them, no doubt, are kids. Go figure.
Design tools that are intended for a generation of Web users who are familiar with the Internet but are not skilled programmers (consider: the phenomenon of 13-year-olds who are “tricking out” their MySpace pages with “digital bling.”) They didn’t realize it, but by cutting and pasting snippets of code together, they were programming.
Publish-then-filter world.Teach students how to interact with digital data in new ways!
overviewMain Points of Discussion:
What are the current trends of Web 2.0?
What are we doing to incorporate the principles of Web 2.0 in our curriculum, and why bother?
How are we teaching information literacy?
What are we doing to help build towards Web 3.0?
background1989 = Web 1.0 “Web as an information source.” (Bernes-Lee, Switzerland)
2004 = Web 2.0Terminology resulted from O'Reilly Media Web conference.
“Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not refer to an update to any technical specifications, but to changes in the ways software developers and end-users use webs.”
2008 = Semantic Web (Web 3.0?)
web2.0 = definitionRefers to the second generation of web-based communities and hosted services focused on:
“facilitating creativity, collaboration, and sharing between users/people [i.e., social-networking sites, wikis, and folksonomies]...Finally, people are people, not ‘users’ - a banned word.”
web2.0 = definition cont.
Web 2.0
write
read
read
write
(blogging)
Web 1.0
write
read
(self-description)
Web 3.0
write
read
read
write
(active-services)
WEBWEB
request
request
characteristicsAJAXValid XHTMLFolksonomiesCSSXML APIsRSS and Atom feedsMashupsWeblogsWiki/ forum softwareWYSIWYGStandards based web (w3c)
categories
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Youtube
Slideshare
flickr
blip
APIs(picnik)
greasemonkey
safariwidgets
googalyzer
delicious
photobucket
linkin
typophile
google docs
wiki
vmukti
skype
thinkature
openWeb
CC
googlecoop
free/open ware
oer
formats (mp3, mp4)
derivatives vs. original
housingmaps.com
programmableweb
.com
gatekeepers
network concentrat
or
social rating
systems (Digg, Pligg)
online socialware
opensource
freeware
moodle
joomla
iSafe
w3c
literacy
trust
+growth
http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/10/15/k12-online-more-than-cool-tools/
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollabora
teShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollabora
teShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
Embed Connect SocializeCollaborat
eShare Remix Filter Liberate Disrupt
class examples
most obvious:
wikipediabloggerflickrfacebookdel.icio.us
uses:
dynamic collaborative informationdynamic collaborative commentarydynamic collaborative imagerydynamic collaborative networkingdynamic collaborative bookmarking
class examplesno so obvious:
sageoffice2.0cclinkedinmoodlefotonotespod/vod casts
uses:
dynamic data aggregation dynamic collaborative workspacesdynamic collaborative sharingdynamic collaborative networkingdynamic collaborative managementdynamic image annotationdynamic data sharing and aggregation
summaryMain Points of Discussion:
What are the current trends of Web 2.0?
What are we doing to incorporate the principles of Web 2.0 in our curriculum, and why bother?
How are we teaching information literacy?
What are we doing to help build towards Web 3.0?
