15
Synthesis of symposium outcomes John Butterworth/ IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre

Synthesis of symposium outcomes

  • Upload
    irc

  • View
    472

  • Download
    6

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

By John Butterworth, IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre. Prepared for the Monitoring sustainable WASH service delivery symposium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 9-11 April 2013.

Citation preview

Page 1: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Synthesis of symposium outcomesJohn Butterworth/ IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre

Page 2: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

It’s the end of the symposium• Did we just network?• Did we learn?

– Presentations, papers, demos• Did we think enough about right things?• Are we concerned about the same things?• Are there things we will do differently?• Did the right people do the thinking & talking?

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 3: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Country monitoring• Government-led• Own history, own priorities, own journeys• Governments are leading, linked to sector reform and SWAPs,

progress• Right players, right accountability, right menu• Government leadership accepted: expectations about good

governance, transparency• Supporting or inhibiting?

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 4: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Global-regional-national coherence• Standard global comparison vs national priorities

and contexts• Inputs and outcomes• GLAAS and JMP evolving• Flexibility and realism in regional approaches• Efforts distinct with differences understood

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 5: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Monitoring human resources

• Making progress but at an early stage• Right people, right skills, right positions?• Indicators and benchmarks need refining• Message: need for staff or contribution of the

industry to the economy?

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 6: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Project monitoring: vicious cycle or necessary?• Different interests, project monitoring valid• Valid roles for NGOs: challenging, innovating• NGOs challenged: lack of accountability, report more,

more directly• Lack of linkages and integration: don’t know or don’t do• Incentives and behaviours

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 7: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Proliferation of sustainability-related tools• Functionality to sustainability predictors• Let the best emerge and be used• Process more important than tools• Multi-stakeholder processes• Ownership? Externally driven. Conditionality.

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 8: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Sanitation and hygiene

• Services discourse is new• Post-ODF monitoring• Hygiene promotion behavioural outcomes with costs: from

research to monitoring, at project not country level• Handwashing: monitoring behaviour change• Monitoring business or monitoring for business: private

sector as a user and beneficiary of efforts

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 9: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

ICT

• Not a panacea, quality/quantity• Different tools• From NGO to government systems• From piles to files: huge volumes of digital data but still

hidden, where is the data?• From tools and data collection to analysis, use, capacity,

costs and governance issues

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 10: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Finance

• Financial language is flowing through the sector• More finance data being collected, tracking

expenditures, Value-for-money• Examples of putting finance tools/data to use• From projects to sustained efforts, from use in

national policy making to local service delivery

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 11: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Other things we learned• Monitoring is a means to an end: use not data dumps

– Keep it simple/relevant and action-orientated– Don’t collect anything that doesn’t lead to decisions and actions

• Monitoring is politics– agendas, power, influence monitoring from data collection to use,

transparency• Think about we want to communicate: fixed assets, costs to

maintain, benefits that flow in taxes

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 12: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Things we didn’t learn enough about…gaps• Use: collect a lot we don’t use…service delivery• Cost of monitoring: sustainability• Transparency and accountability• Monitoring for equity, monitoring unserved• Monitoring for asset management, preventative

maintenance• Using data to engage consumers

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 13: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Overall trends, big questions

• Governments investing more in national monitoring systems – Money, coordination, leadership– National is more than government– Systems go beyond sector monitoring– Use is especially important– Local government level is critical

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 14: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Overall trends, big questions• More coherency or complexity in global monitoring?

– What will be standard? What will use different methods, definitions and indicators

• Project monitoring that uses, supports and reinforces national monitoring systems

• Emergence of bottom-up monitoring processes?– more sustainable? – another dimension in accountability

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium

Page 15: Synthesis of symposium outcomes

Overall trends, big questions

• Governments investing more in national monitoring systems

• More coherency or complexity in global monitoring?• Project monitoring that uses, supports and

reinforces national monitoring systems• Emergence of bottom-up monitoring processes?

Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium