Upload
sesar-joint-undertaking
View
744
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8 March 2016, SESAR Exchange TheatreWorld ATM Congress, Madrid
Ground-to-ground interoperabilityFlight Information Exchange - SWIM Blue Profile
#SESAR@SESAR_JU@WorldATM_Now
Flight Information & SESARSerge Bagieu, SESAR Joint Undertaking
Where are we today with IOP Ground-to-ground validation?
Benefits from an operational perspectiveRémi Chambelin, DSNA
Underlying mechanism - Flight Object ServerHugo Salinas, INDRA
Technical Infrastructure - SWIM Environment & Blue ProfileHakim Souami, Thales
Wrap up & Question & AnswersSerge Bagieu, SESAR Joint Undertaking
What’s in the agenda
Flight information and SESAR
3
Initial SWIMInitial trajectory
information sharing
Source: 2015 European ATM Master Plan
Optimised ATM
Network Services
Advanced Air Traffic Services
High Performing
Airport Operations
Enabling Aviation
Infrastructure
Ground-to-ground Interoperability in a nutshell
4
Watch video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2MxgP5dRRM
Rémi Chambelin, DSNA
BENEFITS FROM AN OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
#SESAR@SESAR_JU@WorldATM_Now
Experiencing IOP in Real Time Validations
6
MUAC/KRH/Reims
VP022 VP711
MUAC/KRH/Reims Seamless cross border
Operations
April 2015 2013
IOP roadmap overview
WAC
March 2016
SESAR 1 Solution validations
November 2016
7
DSNA side with 4Flight (Coflight inside)
VP711 configuration
Experiencing IOP in Real Time Validations
Getting rid of boundaries to achieve Single Sky
• Upstream/downstream bi-directional exchanges, with distant sectors as well as neighbours
• Real-time sharing between all interested partners
• Same level of information for all concerned actors
ALL THE FLIGHT INFORMATION IS SHARED
8
• Data related to a flight (clearance, route, ...) is exchanged mainly with next downstream sector
• Point to point exchange with no real time sharing between all the partners
DIFFICULTIES TO EXCHANGE AND TO USE
INFORMATION SUCH AS CLEARANCE, ROUTE AND
LATE CHANGES
Today’s operations WITH SESAR Solutions
Way to improve ATC safety
For any aircraft in my area of interest, I have access to all clearances given by downstream or upstream ATSU and state frequency
The ATCO can then “delete” this flight from his mental image
Safety is improved in high traffic density areas
9
4F HMI example (VP711)
Way to improve ATC capacity
Direct, route or runway modification
Coordination is immediate, easy and unambiguous
Common situation awareness between multiple partners is ensured in real time
10
Way to improve ATC capacity
4F HMI example during VP711
ATCOs appreciate this feature as a very big improvement regarding safety and situational awareness.
11
Operational conclusion
12
Allow seamless operations over boundaries
Ensure a consistent view of the flight by a disparate set of Air Traffic Centers
Improve airspace capacity while
reducing controllers workload
Tackle current limitations and bring additional
operational benefits
Improve safety through ensuring the resilient provision of
consistent information
A solution to cope with Core Area specific complex situation
Hugo Salinas, INDRA
FLIGHT OBJECT SERVER
#SESAR@SESAR_JU@WorldATM_Now
Flight Object Server Objectives
14
Additional Component to ATC System
Support the Flight Object Handling Translations Dissemination Reception Determination and management of IOP roles
The IOP AREA
15
Union of the Areas of Responsibility (AoRs) and Areas of Interest (AoIs) for several ATSUs.
Within the IOP area a set of rules are defined for :•IOP roles•Flight Object
Creation Distribution
•Mechanism to exchange information
The Flight Object
16
‘Flight Object’ (FO) Flight Key
Flight Plan DataFlight Identification
ATSU Distribution ListCoordination
SSRAircraft
TrajectoryIOP information
DepartureScriptArrival
Departure Clearance
provide consistent view of the flight.
support sharing of consistent flight data between all stakeholders.
The IOP Roles
17
1. Flight Data Manager Publisher (FDMP)
2. Flight Data Contributor (FDC)
3. Flight Data User (FDU)
Dynamic IOP role allocation according to flight situation
IOP Roles : a dynamic concept
18
A B C
D E FX
ATSU E -AOI
T1 planned routeT2 requested route
ATSU A
ATSU B
ATSU C
FDMP Creates and Distribute the Flight Object
FDC Request updates to the FDMP
FDC Request updates to the FDMP
ATSU E FDU Receives the FO, no request to the FDMP
IOP AREA
Architecture Impact
19
SWIM
SWIM ATC –
Specific layer
IOP Application
ATC ComponentX
ATC Component Y
ATC Component FDPS
ATC System – Internal Interface
API ICD
ICD
FOSWIRE ICD
API ICDshared Specifications
Internal Specifications
SWIM
SWIM ATC –
Specific layer
IOP Application
ATC ComponentX
ATC Component Y
ATC Component FDPS
ATC System – Internal Interface
API ICD
ICD
Air Traffic Center #1 Air Traffic Center #2
FOS maturity
20
EXE-04.03-VP-711
VP-711-T NATS-MUAC
EXE-07.06.02-VP-714
VP-711-T ENAV-DSNA
EXE-04.03-VP-030
Exchange Flight Objects with
Network Manager
Exchange Flight Objects with RealTraffic
between ENAV, DSNA
Exchange Flight Objects with RealTraffic
between DFS, MUAC, and DSNA
(with ATCO Actions).
Exchange Flight Objects with RealTraffic
between NATS, MUAC
Exchange Flight Objects with
Extended Path Profile (EPP) information
between MUAC, and LVNL (with ATCO Actions). FOS
Hakim SOUAMI, THALES
SWIM ENVIRONMENTBLUE PROFILE
#SESAR@SESAR_JU@WorldATM_Now
What Defines SWIM?
22
Standards
ATM Information
Infrastructure
GovernanceQualified Partie
Services
SWIM
Ground /GroundSWIM
Data Exchanged
• Sharing information via Providing / Consuming service(s)• Information Services Reference Model (ISRM)
• Common data definition• ATM Information Reference Model (AIRM)
• SWIM Technical infrastructure
A/G DatalinkGround
Management
AOC ATM
AdvancedAirspace
Management
Surveillance Data
Flight Data
Aeronautical Data
Meteo Data
Demand & Capacity DataAirportAirside
Opeations
AerodromeATC En-route /
ApproachATC
Military
AeronauticalInformation
ManagementNetwork
InformationManagement
Meteo
Air/GroundSWIM
ATFCM scenario data
Seamless…
ATM information using SWIM
23
Ground /GroundSWIM
Data Exchanged
• Sharing information via Providing / Consuming service(s)• Information Services Reference Model (ISRM)
• Common data definition• ATM Information Reference Model (AIRM)
• SWIM Technical infrastructure
A/G DatalinkGround
Management
AOC ATM
AdvancedAirspace
Management
AirportAirside
Opeations
AerodromeATC En-route /
ApproachATC
Military
AeronauticalInformation
ManagementNetwork
InformationManagement
Meteo
Air/GroundSWIM
Seamless…
Exchange ModelAIRM
Data Exchanged
Surveillance Data
Flight Data FIXM
Aeronautical Data AIXM
Meteo Data WXXM
AIRM - ATM Information Reference Model
24
SWIM Global Interoperability Framework
25
Interoperable Infrastructure to distribute data & information
26
Standard Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) technologies
Cost Off The Shelves (COTS) based SOA products
Additional Software for integration
IP-based networks
SESAR SWIM Profiles
27
Reduce complexity with technical profiles tailored for specific usage:
Yellow profile for non critical information (AIM, Weather, …)Blue profile for critical information (Flight Object)Purple profile to accommodate air-ground exchanges
The SWIM Blue Profile
The Blue Profile
Real-time or near real-time uses
High availability Secured interactions Severe constraints with
respect to the available resources
Build a unique Flight Object
ATSUs contribute to common view
Dynamic allocation of Flight Object responsibility consistent with ATC handover
28
SWIM Blue Profile Achievements
Sharing of Flight Objects with the
Network Manager
Assessment and Improvement of OMG
DDS Security Standard
Sharing of Flight Objects with
Source-Specific Multicast (SSM)
over PENS
Extract of Real-Traffic between
KUAC, MUAC, and REIMS (with ATCO
Actions).
29
30
SWIM Blue Profile in a nutshell
ED-133Flight Object
Interoperability Specification
SWIM-TI Blue Profile
IOP Maturity Board
AIRMFlight Object
ECTL, ENAV, DFS, DSNA, NATS
ISRM 1.41- Shared Flight Object Service2- ATC Flight
Object Control Service
Serge Bagieu, SESAR JU
CONCLUSIONSQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Consolidating Flight Information Exchanges solution
32
MUAC/KRH/Reims
VP022
2013
VP711
MUAC/KRH/Reims Seamless cross border
Operations
2015
Very Large Scale Demonstration
SESAR 2020 Validations
2019
Skip ATSU
VP841
2016
MUAC/KRH/Reims
2025
ImplementationRule (PCP)
IOP International context
33
• European standardisation– Update EUROCAE ED 133 standard– New SWIM Standards
• International standards– Flight & Flow Information for Collaborative Environnent (FF-ICE) challenges– Information Exchange Standards (FIXM…)– Trajectory Based Operation (TBO) concept
ICATS demonstration
34
Thanks for your attention
35