Upload
ivana-pais
View
385
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology Professional communities online: the case of Legalit
Citation preview
XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology
Professional communities online: the case of Legalit– preliminary results –
Ivana Pais – University of Brescia ([email protected])Angela Palmieri – University of Calabria ([email protected])
Agenda• Theoretical background• Research questions• Empirical setting• Methodology• (Preliminary) results• Discussion• Next steps
Theoretical background
Sociologyof professions
Sociologyof new media
Online professionalcommunities
Theoretical backgroundSociology of professions: profession as communities?A profession, as a whole, cannot be defined as 'community',
unless you consider only the superior layer, for social origin and for position in the stratification.
Reasons: processes of inside stratification tied to different opportunities of career, forms of exercise of the profession, specializations, professionals associations, colleagues and -particularly for the lawyers - clienteles.
(Hughes 1958; Freidson 1983, 1984, 1986; Abbott 1986, 1988; Tousijn 1987; Speranza 1999)
Theoretical backgroundSociology of new media: online communities• They are a way of accessing an open and frequently
democratic group of peers dealing with similar knowledge issues, even if geographically distributed (Ahuja et al., 2003)
• They are ‘communities’, even if virtual: sharing of common interests (Lave, Wenger 1991); sharing of a space, even if not physical; pact of trust; sense of belonging; collective identity (Rheingold 1993; Stone, 1991).
• Imagined communities (Anderson, 1991)• Personalized communities embodied in me-centered
networks (Wellman, 2000); privatization of sociability (Castells, 2001)
Research questionsOnline communities of practice can be considered as
‘professional communities’?
RQ1. What are the distinctive characteristics of the professionals who participate?
RQ2. What is their functioning logic? RQ3. Do the members develop a sense of stronger affiliation
with their profession or with the community online (van Knippenberg, van Schie 2000; Levin 2005)?
Empirical setting• The first (and most active) Italian discussion group for jurists,
founded in 1993• In the last year, it has differentiated its online presence
through various platforms:▫ a Google Group (Legalit), opened in April 2007, 439
members;▫ a Facebook Group (Avvocati italiani), opened in February
2009, 724 members; ▫ a LinkedIn Group (Avvocati italiani), opened in March
2009, 128 members.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600A
pr 0
7M
ay 0
7Ju
n 07
Jul 0
7A
ug 0
7Se
pt 0
7O
ct 0
7N
ov 0
7D
ec 0
7G
en 0
8Fe
b 08
Mar
08
Apr
08
May
08
Jun
08ju
l 08
Aug
08
Sept
08
Oct
08
Nov
08
dec
08G
en 0
9Fe
b 09
Mar
09
Apr
09
May
09
Jun
09Ju
l 09
Aug
09
Sept
09
Oct
09
Nov
09
dec
09G
en 1
0Fe
b 10
Mar
10
Apr
10
May
10
Jun
10
Messages posted on Legalit – April 07 to June 2010
MethodologyCase study• Semi-structured interviews to key-informants• Online questionnaire (28 May – 10 June 2010): 93
respondents out of 427 (22%). The interviewees wrote 9,828 out of 14,955 messages (66%).
• Social Network Analysis (Ucinet and Netdraw)• Content Analysis (Automap and Ora)
(Preliminary) resultsRQ1. What are the distinctive characteristics of the
professionals who participate?• 69% male• 49% in their 30’s, 39% - 40’s, 8% - 50’s e 4% - 60’s• self-employed (89%) and, on average, sharing office space
with less than 4 colleagues• 67% deals with Civil Law; only 3% with all the other
aspects (civil, criminal, business)• clients: private (53%) or small businesses (31%); yearly
average 28 clients and 1.1 case per client• income: 68% less than 60K €
(Preliminary) results• Reason for studying Law: 29% genuine interest in the
science of law, 19% to be self-employed and independent, 12% to be of help to others
• 11% father already lawyer, 5% partner• Only 18% socializes with lawyers in their free-time• Only 14% is member of professional associations• 80% is victim of unethical practice• 80% professional referral system (Freidson 1960)• 48% registered with other online professional
communities, 63% is gamer
(Preliminary) resultsRQ2. What are their functioning logics? • E-mail address when registering: 40% private, 40%
business, 11% has only one e-mail, 9% dedicated address• How they knew about Legalit: 80% via internet , 20%
word of mouth, 10% introduced directly by the administrator
• 82% knew no other member when registering; 13% contacts members through e-mail; 6% has met other members
(Preliminary) results• Choosing a message▫ To read: 53% because of title, 24% read all, 21% when time
permits, 2% rarely▫ To reply to: 63% topic in which they feel skilled, 15% topic of
interest, 2% posted by a colleague, 20% never• Lurkers: 57% lack of time, 29% does not believe to be
competent, 14% fears of making mistakes• Prerequisites for building a reputation on Legalit:
technical competence (54%), accuracy of posting (39%), attention to editorial aspects (15%), charisma (13%), time on Legalit (11%), group role (6%), external crediting (5%)
(Preliminary) results
05
101520253035404550
exch
ange
of
info
rmat
ion
exch
ange
of
opin
ion
prob
lem
sol
ving
look
ing
for
colla
bora
tion
look
ing
for
frie
ndsh
ip
goalresult
(Preliminary) results
0102030405060
aspe
cts
wit
h w
hich
I'm
invo
lved
re
gula
rly
ques
tion
s w
hich
I
only
occ
asio
nally
m
eet
ques
tion
s I
don'
t de
al w
ith,
but
like
to
be
info
rmed
ques
tion
s re
gard
ing
prof
essi
on
goalresult
(Preliminary) resultsRQ3. Do the members develop a sense of stronger affiliation
with their profession or with the community online?• Comparing competence: on average 15% feels less
prepared than colleagues, 67% the same, and 18% more • Strong point: managing communication• Weak point: preparedness with regard to their
specialization
(Preliminary) results
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
com
peti
tion
conf
lict
help
fuln
ess
ease
of r
each
ing
an
agre
emen
t
quic
k at
get
ting
in
form
atio
n
wid
e ra
nge
of v
iew
s
cont
rol
fun
info
rmal
ity
fam
iliar
ity
moresameless
(Preliminary) resultsSense of belonging
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
legalit italian lawyers
layers legal professions
very muchsomewhatnot muchnot at all
DiscussionSameness + sense of belonging
In contrast to the profession as a whole, the online discussion group of Italian lawyers can be considered a community of professionals
Next steps• Social network analysis + content analysis
SNA: test March 2009
March 2009: network by message content
Exchange of advice
Requests for collaboration
Legalit Group
Lawyers
Next stepsComparing:• Other platforms (Legalit in Facebook ans LinkedIn)• Other online communities (lawyers in other countries, other
legal professions, other professions)
Professional communities online: the case of Legalit– preliminary results –
Ivana Pais – University of Brescia ([email protected])Angela Palmieri – University of Calabria ([email protected])