5
1 Maximizing Satisfaction by Learning while Earning Gui Liberali Erasmus School of Economics Sloan School of Management, MIT Website Morphing Algorithms Have Been Published and Generated Quite Some BuzzMorphing trilogy (Website, Banner and Time-to-Morph) published at Marketing Science (twice), Management Science (forthcoming), Sloan Management Review Discussed in dozens of blogs and magazines

Gui Liberali Booking.com apr 4 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Gui Liberali Booking.com apr 4 2014

1

Maximizing Satisfaction by Learning while Earning

Gui Liberali Erasmus School of Economics Sloan School of Management, MIT

Website Morphing Algorithms Have Been Published and Generated Quite Some Buzz… •  Morphing trilogy (Website, Banner and Time-to-Morph) published at Marketing Science (twice),

Management Science (forthcoming), Sloan Management Review •  Discussed in dozens of blogs and magazines

Page 2: Gui Liberali Booking.com apr 4 2014

2

BT Experiment

•  Content areas of home page

•  All saw the same landing page

•  Each content area present the info differently

Source: Hauser, Urban, Liberali and Braun, 2009

Trick: Match cognitive styles and website characteristics

Cognitive-style dimensions (2 x 2 x 2 x 2) •  leader vs. follower •  analytic/visual vs. holistic/verbal •  impulsive vs. deliberative •  active vs. passive

Website characteristics (2 x 2 x 2) •  graphical vs. verbal presentations •  small- vs. large information load •  focused vs. general content

Source: Hauser, Urban, Liberali and Braun, 2009

Page 3: Gui Liberali Booking.com apr 4 2014

3

Key Challenges Fundamental Problems are general and application

independent (morphs can be sites, products, ..)

•  How do we update our beliefs about the cognitive style of each user?

•  Given these beliefs, what is the optimal morph (optimal website version? Optimal product to show?)

To keep it simple we will look at an application that morphs sites.

© 2008 MIT Sloan School of Management

Optimal solution with Gittins’ indices (assume we know cognitive style)

Gittins’ indices for the eight morphs.

Morph that was chosen.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000

Visitor

Cho

sen

Mor

ph

0.35

0.45

0.55

0.65

0.75

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000

Visitor

Gitt

ins'

Indi

ces

Morph 0 Morph 1 Morph 2 Morph 3 Morph 4 Morph 5 Morph 6 Morph 7

System experiments with Morph 3 for a while before settling back to Morph 2.

Source: Hauser, Urban, Liberali and Braun, 2009

Page 4: Gui Liberali Booking.com apr 4 2014

4

Empirically-grounded synthetic visitors (normalize profit to 1.0)

Expected Reward

Improve-ment Efficiency Relative

Efficiency No Gittins’ loop nor knowledge of cognitive styles. 0.3205 0.0% 80.4% 0.0% No morphing. Website chosen optimally by Gittins’ loop. 0.3625 13.1% 91.0% 53.9% Morphing: Match characteristics to cognitive style Bayesian inference of cognitive styles (10 clicks) 0.3844 19.9% 96.5% 82.0% Bayesian inference of cognitive styles (50 clicks) 0.3865 20.6% 97.0% 84.7% Perfect information on cognitive styles, Gittins’ loop.* 0.3879 21.0% 97.4% 85.5% Perfect information on style and purchase probabilities* 0.3984 24.3% 100% 100%

*Upper bounds. BT does not have perfect information on either cognitive styles or purchase probabilities.

Source: Hauser, Urban, Liberali and Braun, 2009

Estimated impact for BT Group

•  Gen-2 Results – 80,000 visitors –  Gittins’ loop alone – find the best static = $52.3 M –  10-click Bayesian loop adds + $27.4 M

– Gittins’ plus Bayesian = $79.7 M –  50-click Bayesian loop adds + $2.6 M –  perfect information adds + $1.8 M

Source: Hauser, Urban, Liberali and Braun, 2009

Page 5: Gui Liberali Booking.com apr 4 2014

5

Website Design Recommendations Morphing Theory relies heavily on website design

Website will morph efficiently when

•  It is able to rapidly identify the user style from clicks: we learn style from link choice •  It chooses the optimal morph for that style

Designing links •  A click is choice among alternatives: if alternatives are different, a click is informative •  Design webpages so that are links with different cognitive cues in the same page

Designing Morphs •  Best morph for one style should (ideally) be worst for another style •  Design various morphs and test them in priming study. Then you can pick the most

discriminating morphs before going live

Source: Hauser, Urban, Liberali and Braun, 2009

For more details

[email protected]

http://people.few.eur.nl/liberali Hauser, J., Liberali, G. & Urban, G (2014). Website Morphing 2.0: Technical and

Implementation Advances and a Field Experiment. Management Science. Urban, G, Liberali, G., Bordley, R, Macdonald, E & Hauser, J. (2014).

Morphing Banner Advertising. Marketing Science, 33(1), 27-46. Hauser, J., Urban, G, Liberali, G. & Braun, M. (2009). Website Morphing. Marketing

Science, 28(2), 202-223