33
COLLOCATION

Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

presentation for a semantic course MA level

Citation preview

Page 1: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

COLLOCATION

Page 2: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Firth introduced the notion of collocations by his statement:

“You shall know a word

by the company it keeps”

Page 3: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

heavy

smokerThis is a heavy bag rain

traffic

Page 4: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Collocates are lexemes that co-occur with each other in natural texts.

( http://www-01.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsACollocate.htm )

Page 5: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

•collocation )n.( A term used in lexicology by some linguists )especially Firthian( to refer to the habitual co-occurrence of individual lexical items

. )Crystal 6 edn(

Page 6: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

For example, auspicious collocates with : occasion, event,

letter collocates with alphabet, graphic

Page 7: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Collocations and idioms

we have to differentiate between collocations and idioms .

Idiom : a term used in grammar and lexicology to refer to a sequenceof words which is semantically and often syntactically restricted, so thatthey function as a single unit. From a semantic viewpoint, the meanings of theindividual words cannot be summed to produce the meaning of the idiomaticexpression as a whole. From a syntactic viewpoint, the words often do notpermit the usual variability they display in other contexts, e.g. it’s raining catsand dogs does not permit *it’s raining a cat and a dog/dogs and cats, etc.

.

Page 8: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Idioms Collocations to kick the bucket heavy rain

give up make a mistake

Page 9: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Collocates may be characterized as follows :

1 .Syntactically and semantically permissible

Page 10: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Example:

There was green grass growing everywhere

Page 11: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

2 .Syntactically permissible but

semantically impermissible

Page 12: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Example:

There were green ideas growing everywhere

Page 13: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

3. Syntactically and semantically impermissible

Page 14: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

'There was green ideas grows everywhere

Page 15: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Collocate may also be characterized as follow:

Syntactically and semantically permissible

, but incidental, as in live metaphor

Example

The barn was painted red like a tomato

Page 16: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Syntactically and semantically permissible, but fixed in usage, as in dead metaphors

( dead metaphor :a word or phrase that has lost its force through common usage / Webster 11 edn)\

red as a beet' He turned as

Page 17: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

“Collocation is not simply a matter of association of ideas. For, although milk

is white we should not say white milk ,though the expression white paint

is common enough”

Palmer)1976: p.76(

Page 18: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Although collocation is very largely determined by meaning, it can not easily be predicted in terms of the meaning of associated words

Example: blond with hair We should not talk about a blond door or a blond dress Also : rancid with bacon and butter

(milk never collocates with rancid but with sour)

Page 19: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Pretty child and buxom neighbor normally refer to females Not pretty boy or buxom man This is found in the collective words:

denoting a number of persons or things considered as one group or whole)) Folk of sheep Herd of cows

School of whales

Page 20: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Words may have more specific meanings in particular collocations

example: abnormal or exceptional weather

but an exceptional child is not an

abnormal child

Page 21: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

It would be a mistake to attempt to draw a clear distinguishing line between those collocations that are predictable from the meanings of the words that co-occur and those

that are not

Page 22: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

One can with, varying degrees of plausibility ,provide a semantic explanation by assigning very particular meanings to the individual words rancid : unpleasant taste associated with butter

Page 23: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

There is some plausibility in accounting for dogs bark, cats mew in terms of the kind of noise made ,since bark can be used of other animals )squirrels(

Page 24: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Not only is some of the semantic explanation a little implausible, but there are other examples where it would seem totally inappropriate)herd of cows \ flock of sheep( the only difference between herd and flock is that one is used with

cows and the other with sheep

Page 25: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

a word will often collocate with a number of other words that have some thing in common semantically

Page 26: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Palmer “individual words or sequences of

words will not collocate with certain groups of words. Thus, though we may say The rhododendron died, we shall not say The rhododendron passed away, in spite of the fact that pass away seems to mean ‘die’.” )1986:78(. This is caused by the restriction on the use of a particular word with a group of

words that are semantically related .

Page 27: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Cruse explains the problem by saying that pass away requires the grammatical subject to be human and that’s why it cannot be used

with a shrub

Page 28: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Cruse emphasises the semantic arbitrariness of the restriction and calls it collocational restriction. He defines it as “co-occurrence restrictions that are irrelevant to truth-conditions

Page 29: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Cruse maintains that collocational restrictions are not logically necessary; they are not primarily there to encode part of the message. This fact was already discussed by Firth who says that “meaning by collocation is an abstraction at the syntagmatic level and is not directly concerned with the conceptual or idea approach to the meaning of words”

Page 30: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

In relation to synonymy, we must not forget about collocational range and collocational restriction. Lyons )1995( speaks about collocational range of an expression, i.e. the set of contexts in which it can occur He relates it to the condition that two expressions are absolutely synonymous when “they are synonymous in all contexts” )1995: 61(. Lyons exemplifies his thesis by big and large. There are many contexts in which these two expressions cannot be substituted without violating the collocational restrictions of one or the other

You are making a big mistake. You are making a large mistake

Page 31: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Palmer )1986( sees three kinds of collocations :

1 .some are based wholly on the meaning of the item as in the unlikely green cow. semantics)

2 .some are based on range – a word may be used with a whole set of words that have some semantic features in common.” This accounts for the unlikeliness of pretty boy

( pretty is used to denote females )

Page 32: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

3 .some restrictions are collocational in the strictest sense, involving neither meaning, nor range” )1986(, as for example addled eggs.

Page 33: Collocation by mahmoud abu qarmoul

Adjective + noun

verb + noun

verb + adverb

Adverb + adjective

noun + noun

Verbs + preposition

a major problem

set the table

struggle desperately

sound asleep

a surge of anger

Filled with horror