12
Flickr Organizr Andrea Wiggins, Timothy Mills, Matt Rubinstein, Min Hu, David Lee

622 Final Deliverable

  • Upload
    triff

  • View
    272

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 622 Final Deliverable

Flickr Organizr

Andrea Wiggins, Timothy Mills, Matt Rubinstein, Min Hu, David

Lee

Page 2: 622 Final Deliverable

Organizr Overview

Page 3: 622 Final Deliverable

Personas and Scenarios

LauraArtist, 34 years old

New User

SaraPhysics Ph.D. student, 26 years old

Intermediate User

JohnCarpenter, 46 years old

Expert User

Page 4: 622 Final Deliverable

Summary of Findings

• Overall Flickr usability is very good

• Flickr is on an iterative release cycle(it’s constantly being changed… for the better)

• Some issues identified– Visibility– Labeling– Consistency

Page 5: 622 Final Deliverable

Usability testing: Overall Findings

Page 6: 622 Final Deliverable

Post Questionnaire ResponsesEase of Task Performance

Hardest Aspect of Organizr to Use

Aspect of Organizr they “Don’t Like”

Participant 1 Not too hard Groups Other – small size of text, basic tasks require practice

Participant 2 Very easy “except last task”

Sets Batch Organizr – difficulty selecting subsets of current selection

Participant 3 Not too hard Other – “missing out on little options”

Batch Organizr – “needs prompt to save changes because save button isn’t obvious”

Participant 4 Very easy Other – changing representative photo for sets

Batch Organizr

Page 7: 622 Final Deliverable

Evaluation Methods

• User testing– 4 subjects, 5 tasks

• Survey– 107 respondents

• Heuristic Evaluation– 10 heuristics with 5 reviewers

• Comparative Analysis– 9 physical and digital competing systems

• Vocabulary / Visual analysis

Page 8: 622 Final Deliverable

Visibility

• Findings: Clear batch, Findr filter feature, save button, date selector are examples of many functions are underutilized because they are not clearly visible

• Evidence: User testing, heuristic evaluation

• Recommendations: Trying other layouts that place functions in better locations. Need more pop-outpop-out

Page 9: 622 Final Deliverable
Page 10: 622 Final Deliverable

Labeling

• Findings: Some of the labeling is inconsistent. – “Add to set” sometimes creates a new set– Organizr vs Organizer vs Organize

• Evidence: Survey responses, Interviews, Heuristic Evaluation, User Testing, and Vocabulary Analysis

• Recommendations: Card sorting to determine optimal vocabulary

Page 11: 622 Final Deliverable

Consistency

• Findings: Good usability principles make for poor usability… sometimes. Its easy to select multiple things into the finder, but when you want to drag them out, it’s one at a time. Same thing is true when you’re working with groups.

• Evidence: User Testing, GTN, and Heuristics• Recommendations: Interaction consistency vs

labeling consistency.

Page 12: 622 Final Deliverable

Questions?