Upload
djhutch
View
490
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given by Catherine Teeling and Lee Woods (Portsmouth School of Architecture, School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Portsmouth) at UPEN workshop - Climate change and the Solent: Opportunities and Vulnerabilities
Citation preview
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
Interreg IVCLow Carbon Economies
Energy EfficiencyRenewable Energies
Eco-innovation and Environmental Technologies Sustainable Transport
Behaviour Change
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCitTransport Carbon IntenCities
Sustainable Transport
SILCSStrategies for Innovative Low Carbon Settlements
Eco-innovation and Environmental Technologies
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCitTransport Carbon IntenCities
Sustainable Transport
€ 322,100.00 - € 261,975.00
Strategies for Innovative Low Carbon Settlements
Eco-innovation and Environmental Technologies
€ 302,752.00 - € 227,064.00
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
Strategies for Innovative Low Carbon Settlements
Transport Carbon IntenCities
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCit Partners
• CURe – University of Portsmouth – SE UK (SEEDA)• Cracow University of Technology – Malapolska - Poland• Viimsi Municipality, Viimsi Parish - Estonia• SEIT Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn – Estonia
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCit
AimIdentify - Schemes and policies with the potential
to reduce carbon intensive travel
Support - development, economic growth and sustainability of new and existing
urban environments
Integrated approach to sustainable mobility and urban and regional development to determine improved implementation of Low Carbon Transport strategies to the benefit of both.
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCit
How
Method - Common approach to measuring travel
intensity and carbon audits with respect
to CO2 emissions – all scales
Pilots - installation design, development &
implementation
Advice - web environment project updates of key
Guide material outputs good practice guidance
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCitPilot Studies
CURe, University of Portsmouth 1. Big Green Commuter Challenge (BGCC)2. Land Use Transport Interaction (LUTI) Modelling 3. Design Charrette
Krakow University of Technology (CUT) 4. Promotional Tram event5. Promotional 'Bike Happening' event6. Transport policy measures7. Simulation Modelling
Viismi Municipality 8. Various alternatives of public transport 9. Coastline development incorporating leisure facilities 10. Viimsi Bike event
Stockholm Environmental Institute, Tallinn (SEIT) 11. Interactive internet cartoon 12. Estonian transport carbon audit and policy pathway
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCitResults
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
05:00-06:00
06:00-07:00
07:00-08:00
08:00-09:00
09:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
Child Student Adult Elderly
Impact LocationTransport policy measures (Pilot study 6)(VISUM)
Krakow, Poland
Overall, a 20% reduction over a 10 year period (2007-15)580,000 veh-km during afternoon rush hour.
116 kg of CO2 per capita per year.
Simulation modelling of different land use schemes (Pilot study 7)(VISUM)
Krakow, Poland Veh-km CO2 (T)
Land use development plan 4,192,000 386 Transportation corridors 4,006,000 369
188 kg of CO2 per capita per year.
Various transport and land use interventions (Pilot study 2)
South Hants, UK
Model used as best practise exemplar to inform partners’ models.
Various alternatives of public transport(Pilot study 8)
Viimsi, Estonia 72.4 CO2 (kg) per capita per year
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
TraCitResults
Bike event Krakow
Bike event Viimsi
Tram event Krakow
BGCC Cartoon
Number aware (or participations) of the event
500 315 1,300 - 100,000 estimated hits
Survey sample 419 112 120 1,089 -
Cost (€) 5,500 15,282 2,000 3,338 1,296 (1st cartoon only)
Date of event 25/5/2011 4/6/2011 10/12/2011 17/5/2011 -23/5/2011
18/5/2011 launched
Reduction in CO2 (kg per capita
per day)
0.25 0.03 (from literature)
1.75 0.74 0.01 (from literature)
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
Project Partners
SE UK - Seeda • CURe University of Portsmouth (Lead Partner)
Noord Brabant• Province Noord Brabant , Holland
SE UK - Seeda • KCC Kent County Council
Andalucia • EPSA Empresa Publica de Suelo de Andalucia
(The Public Enterprise for Social Housing in Andalucia )Spain
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
AimIdentify and demonstrate effectiveness of low carbon building initiatives within the framework of sustainable developments
ObjectiveTo explore and evaluate solutions and low
carbon strategies reducing carbon emissions for Sustainable Developments, whilst supporting economic growth and sustainable communities.
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
Themes:
Participation – Involvement of all stakeholders
(consultation & engagement practice)
Finance – Approach on financial models and life cycle costs
Organisation – Optimal building design process & delivery
– construction & implementationTechnology – Most effective systems for low carbon solutions
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
Project Outcomes
• Regional workshops• Case studies – evaluation & appraisal• Site Visits to regional sustainable developments• Themed reports (Participation, Finance, Organisation, Technologies)• Final comprehensive project report (Correlation across all themes)• Final Dissemination Events • Transferable practice – regional policies and strategies
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCS
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCSCase StudiesUK
Graylingwell Chichester, Carbon Neutral Neighbourhood, the largest carbon neutral development in the United Kingdom JTP
Sustainable Cities of the Future – Eco Towns – ME Martin Centre
Chale – Community Retrofit; Isle of Wight - Southern Housing Group, Isle of Wight:
Sustainable Neighbourhoods Pan Urban Extension – Isle of Wight City Council:
ecoisland – the hub of a sustainable future; Eco-Island partnership CIC, Isle of Wight:
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCSCase StudiesUK
Testing the Future : SMART URBAN-ISM Urban Initiatives
Borough Grove - Retrofit housing solutions, Petersfield – Interreg GESB
Rackheath eco-community. Norfolk
Live Design Charrette: Working with the community of Portsea to define their own sustainable strategies
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCSCase Studies
Netherlands
Innovative-green.Geerpark.Waterslingers. - Opportunity Cards – Dak Lab “Brabantwoning” in Almkerk.
Andalusia. Spain.Rehabilitación de la Barriada San Martín de Porres. Córdoba.MONITORING OF SOCIAL HOUSING. R&D PROJECT: EFFICACIA.SOCIAL HOUSING IN SEVILLE ( POLÍGONO AEROPUERTO-SEVILLE)Social housing in Umbrete, Seville.
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCSResults
Geer Park
Waterslingers
Christiaan Huygens College
Brabantwoning
San Martín de Porres
EFFICACIA
Umbrete
Polígono Aeropuerto
Graylingwell Park
Spanners Close
Borough Grove
Rackheath
High insulationX
XX
XX
X6
32Air tightness
XX
XX
X5
Passive design / orientationX
XX
XX
5N
atural lightingX
XX
X4
Solar protectionX
XX
X4
Green roofX
XX
3N
atural ventilationX
XX
3Evaporative cooling
X1
Low-tech
X1
Air source heat pump
XX
XX
413
VentilationX
XX
X4
Efficient lighting
XX
X3
Ground source heat pump
XX
2PV panels roof
XX
XX
XX
614
Solar thermal panels
XX
XX
X5
Combined Heat and Pow
erX
1Com
post biogasX
1W
ind turbinesX
1M
etering
XX
X4
8M
onitoringX
XX
X4
SUDS
XX
XX
47
Managem
entX
1W
ater -cycleX
1W
ater saving measures
X1
BiodiverstityX
XX
XX
512
Green-blueX
XX
3Grow
ing lotsX
X2
Eco-friendly materials
X1
Green corridorsX
1Prefabrication
XX
27
R&D
XX
X3
Working Process
XX
2Aff
ordableX
XX
X4
8Cost eff
ectiveX
XX
X4
ProjectX
XX
3Construction
XX
X3
BuiltX
XX
XX
X6
73
415
69
97
116
1014
101
CASE STUDIES
nº items
Project's nº Items
Total strategy items
STRATEGYTO
PIC
INN
OVATIO
N
COSTS
STAGE
Province Noord
Braband.NL
Andalusia.SSouth East
England. UK
PASSIVE STRATEGIES
ACTIVE SYSTEM
S
RENEW
ABLE EN
ERGY
CON
TROL
WATER
NATURE
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCS
ResultsNumerous barriers continue to impede the improvement of energy efficiency in homes. The
energy efficiency market is still characterised by information failure, numerous convoluted incentives in the energy chain, high subsidies, and disparate processes of measurement and verification and fragmented organisational structures.
The need for strong leadership and greater co-ordination in delivering and sustaining low carbon development projects is paramount. This includes leadership from local authorities with clear and consistent vision, encouraging and enabling partnerships with the private sector and community, through a simplified regulatory approach.
Far greater collaboration is needed through long term proactive partnerships between all stakeholders. The challenges we face need us to work holistically and at scale, to develop the evidence for what works to encourage and de-risk investment.
The availability of finance to meet the carbon reductions targets is probably the biggest challenge to overcome. Retrofitting existing buildings, particularly public sector housing, is the largest part of the problem for the built environment.
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCS
Results
Good architecture should always have due regard to the prevailing climate. Passive design principles should always be utilised as a base standard to reduce the reliance on energy consuming technologies.
The requirement to innovate: not just technological innovations but systems innovation and smarter ways of using technology. We need new models of delivery through community engagement; and new models of social enterprise which give the community a sense of ownership and encourage social cohesion.
It is essential to, work with, and engage communities over the whole project life – to understand the “Characteristics of place” - sharing the issues, the aspirations and evolving solutions collectively an collaboratively ensuring the community benefits from the legacy of infrastructure investments such as retrofit and renewables through stimulating local low carbon supply chains.
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
SILCS
Results
The availability of finance to meet the carbon reductions targets is probably the biggest challenge to overcome. Retrofitting existing buildings, particularly public sector housing, is the largest part of the problem for the built environment. Particularly as life cycle costing techniques are not systematically employed in making long term economic decisions.
Contrary to expectations, this reports findings emphasise that increased capital availability is not necessarily the most important tool in overcoming energy efficiency’s financial barrier. Instead, the solution lies in carefully designed policy packages, and strong political will, open and accessible advocacy and transparent accessible organizational processes. Policy makers should focus on reducing obstacles to the involvement of private and public stakeholders.
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
Policies &
Recommendations
Brussels 21st September 2011
PP1.1 INTRODUCTION
www.TraCit.port.ac.ukwww.TraCit.org.uk
Lee Woods: [email protected]
www.SILCS.port.ac.ukwww.SILCS.net.uk
Catherine Teeling:[email protected]
www.CURe.port.ac.uk
Catherine Teeling:[email protected]