Upload
justin-shin
View
1.360
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
국내 종합병원의 웹접근성실태조사 자료
Citation preview
2. . . , , , [2]. [5]. , (accessibility) . [6]. (technology-oriented) (culture-oriented) . [7]. . , . . 2007 6 6 75.5% 3,443 , 12 56.7% . / [3], [4] .84.4% . . . 2. . 4 / 20042.1 4929, 2005 5,110, 2006 9,555 [5]. (Tim Berners-Lee) (Universality) , 88 2010. 6 3. [9]. 2.2 , , 1) . ., 1994 , , . 1 W3C (World Wide. WebConsortium).1997(, ), EC(European Commission) , W3C WAI(Web Accessibility Initiative) WCAG(Web Content [8][33].Accessibility Guideline)1.0 , 2008 12 WCAG2.0 . WCAG 2.0 , ( 1) , (2002.1 )ISO(International , , , Standards Organization) (ISO 13497, 1997) (Physical access to equipment) Benyon[42] (Operational suitability) , W3C WAI[9] , , &Thatcher, et.al.[8] (User Agent)Wikipedia[44] Microsoft[43] , , . , Fujitsu[45] . Hitachi[46] (, ), [33] . (113)89 4. , , 4 WCAG 1.0 12 , (J-WAS) 2001 4 61 . WCAG2.0 . . (Japanese Industrial 1996 9 (American Standards, JIS) with Disabilities Act, ADA) - , () 2) . (2004 6) 3). 1998 508 (undue burden) , . JIS, , , X8341-3:2004 . JIS X8341-3 2000 8 7 2009 WCAG2.0 , [44]. , [10] . 2005 10 , , . . .1) , 1999 6 Mcguire , . 2.3 (Disability Discrimination Act, DDA) (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, HREOC) . , , . 2002 1 DDA . () Oracle (2002), B. Sexton Target (2006), 3) ISO/IEC Guide71 2003 JIS Z 8071 JIS. (2007), () , JIS X8341-1:2004 (2007) . , (JIS2) ADA , , X8341-2:2004), (JIS X8341-3:2004), (JIS X8341-4:2005), . , , (JIS X8341-5:2005) . , Universal Design, . , JIS Z8071:2003 ISO/IEC Guide71 . KS A ISO/IEC Guide71 .90 2010. 6 5. . 2009 2.4 , , , , [19]. ( 31). Loiacono[20] Bobby WCAG2.0 100 1.0 20% 2.0(Korean Web Content Accessibility . Sullivan & Matson[21] Guideline2.0, KWCAG2.0, ) 50 WCAG 1.0 . 2008 4 1 ( ) . , LIFT ( 4. , 20), , , ( 46) , , . . Mankoff et al.[19] 2009 . , , , 2011 2015 (screen reader) ( 14 1). , , . Lchtenberg et al.[22] [11]. 2005 139 WCAG1.0 [12]-[15]. . 18%(15 sites) Level A Level AA , Level . 2006AAA . 82% . Zeng et al.[23] 108 [13]. 2008 () ., 503 Web Accessibility [15].Barriers(WAB) Score . (113) 91 6. , 70% , . . WCAG 1.0OGrady[24] WCAG1.0 Bobby . [30] Bobby WCAG1.0 1 40% , . Mancini et . , al.[25] Italy 170 WCAG1.0 1 . 70% . WCAG1.0 [31] 10 , . [26] A-prompt 2005, 2006 2 . , . 54.2, 56.6 . , 75.7%, 78.7% . . 2005 60.8%, 2006 63.2% . HTML . . [32] [27] 16 . . KADO-WAH 2.0 WCAG1.0 , Fujitsu1 2 . WebInspector5.0 JIS X8341-3:2004( ) . 64.39 . [33] 40 . KADO-WAH 2.0 [28] . . , . [29] . 3.5 . , 2.2 , WCAG 1.0 50% . [34] 3 922010. 6 7. KWCAG1.0 . KADO-WAH2.0 2007 . , [35]. 4 . 2005 2007-2009 2 . .3.2 3. (2. ). 3.1 . KADO-WAH2.0(Web Accessibility Helper2.0) 2005 . 2008 (IWCAG)1.0 13 ., 26 51 . 5 1.0, W3C WCAG1.0, 508 3 1194.22( ) . . () , 503 . , , , , . , , (, (http://www.wah.or.kr) ) [15]. 2008 4 11 2009 . WAMS(Web Accessibility Managemenrt System,4) 40, 40 80 (), http://www.cakesoft.net) , 4) 3 3 6 2 . 2010 1 , 40 . 2, 8 1 . (113)93 8. . Validator (2 ).Validator . Validator (IWCAG1.0, WCAG1.0 ) . , , . , URL URL . . , . , Validator , CSS, HTLM . , , . , , ( . , ) . 3.3 . (Accessibility-based Criteria, ABC) (Usability-based Criteria, UBC) . . KADO-WAH2.0 KWCAG1.0 14 1 , , , (non-text content, ), 2 , . ( 1 Tab , tabindex) ( . , accesskey) (priority)-1 . . HTML , , . , .942010. 6 9. , 27 2) . , . . One-stop [39]. 2012 10 , . . , . . , , . . , . , , 100 , , , , , , .[37][38]. 2010 15 120 . ( 27, , KADO-WAH2.0 ( 2) alt longdesc KWCAG 1.0 1. *) alt 1.1(priority1) alt WCAG1.0 1(priority1) (alt ) 508 a. title KWCAG 1.0 2. title 2.2(priority1) title WCAG1.0 12(priority1) title 508 i. ()KWCAG1.0 2. 2.4(priority1) WCAG1.0 9.2(priority2) *)(, , , ,, , GIF, , , ASCII, ) . (113) 95 10. . 64%, 60%, 62% , Dell Precision PWS670(CPU 3.2GHz, , RAM 1GB), Microsoft Window XP2002, Internet . Explore 6.0 . 90% 34 44% 4. 80% 39(51%) .4.1 2008 [41] 6 . 2008 KADO-WAH 14% 62% 4 . 90% . 2008 3 (, , ) 34 80 (44%) 100% 3 . 19(7 ). , , . . , ( 4) vs. 90% , 8980% , 80% [15], (2161/3357, 64%) (1196/3357, 36%) . (1905/3175, 60%) (1270/3175, 40%) (4066/6532, 62%)( 3) ( 5) 381837 (%) 391737(90 ) 18(47%)16(41%)34(44%)773574(89-80)1(3%)3(8%)4(5%)(80 ) 19(50%)20(51%)39(51%)4.2 38(100%)39(100%)77(100%)4.2.1 ( 6) W3C WCAG, 2010.12008.8 508, IWCAG (2161/3357, 64%)(525/3303, 16%) . (1905/3175, 60%)(340/2824, 12%) (4066/6532, 62%)(865/6127, 14%)962010. 6 11. ( 7) KWCAG1.0 2.2 1 1 (189/193, 98%) 2 (149/151, 99%) . 3(103/103, 100%) . 4 (61/62, 98%) 35 100% 5(79/87, 91%) 22 63% 6(87/87, 100%) 7 (42/42, 100%). 8 (78/78, 100%) 91%, 62% 9(113/113, 100%) 10 (84/84, 100%) . 11 (128/128, 100%) 12 (127/127, 100%)(100% ) (0% 13 (56/56, 100%)) . 14 (53/53, 100%)2008 15 (107/107, 100%) 1, 16 (115/115, 100%) 22 (11 ). 17 (138/139, 99%) 18 (121/126, 96%)( 8) vs. (1830/1851, 99%) (75/82, 91%) (7/82, 9%) (50/80, 62%)(30/80, 38%) 1 (177/178, 99%) 2(166/171, 97%) (125/162, 77%) (37/162, 23%) 3 (41/41, 100%) 4(89/92, 97%) ( 9) 5 (47/47, 100%) (%) 6 (79/84, 94%) 7 (102/102, 100%)(90 )12(67%) 10(59%) 22(63%) 8 (170/170, 100%)(89-80) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 9 (175/177, 99%) (80 )6(33%) 7(41%) 13(37%) 10 (86/90, 96%) 18(100%)17(100%) 35(100%) 11 (32/32, 100%) 12 (78/78, 100%)( 10) 13 (73/74, 99%) 14 (82/82, 100%) 15 (59/59, 92%) 2010.12008.8 16 (26/29, 90%) (75/82, 91%) (1/22, 5%) (1482/1511, 98%) (50/80, 62%) (0/29, 0%) (3312/3362, 99%) (125/162, 77%)(1/51, 2%) (113) 97 12. ( 11) 77 10 (13%) . 1 (15/15, 100%) 17%, 30%, 23% 2 (15/15, 100%) . 3 (1/1, 100%) (62%) (77%) 4 (1/1, 100%) 5 (7/7, 100%) . 6 (3/3, 100%) 7 (1/1, 100%) . 8 (12/12, 100%) 9 (12/12, 100%) . 10(5/5, 100%) 2008 11(1/1, 100%) 12(2/2, 100%) 2, 10 (75/75, 100%) (15 ). 1 (15/15, 100%) 2 (1/1, 100%)( 12) vs. 3 (1/1, 100%) 4 (2/2, 100%) (290/1740, 17%) (1450/1740, 83%) 5 (1/1, 100%) (520/1735, 30%) (1215/1735, 70%) 6 (3/3, 100%) (810/3475, 23%) (2665/3475, 77%) 7 (5/5, 100%) 8 (4/4, 100%) 9 (15/15, 100%) ( 13) 10(3/3, 100%)(%) (50/50, 100%)(90 ) 5(14%)5(14%)10(14%) (125/125, 100%)(89-80) 0(0%)0(0%) 0(0%)(80 )32(86%)32(86%) 64(86%) 37(100%) 37(100%)74(100%) KWCAG1.0 2.4 ( 14) . 2010.1 2008.8 . (290/1740, 17%)(101/2122, 5%) onmousedown" onkeydown" (520/1735, 30%) (56/1099, 5%) . (810/3475, 23%)(157/3221, 5%)982010. 6 13. ( 15) . 14 1 (30/30, 100%) 2 (76/76, 100%) . 3 (78/78, 100%) 4% 4 (13/13, 100%) 3 . 5 (7/7, 100%) (204/204, 100%) [36]. 1 (22/22, 100%) 2 (96/96, 100%) . 3 (263/263, 100%) 4 (20/20, 100%) ( 16) 5 (22/22, 100%) (423/423, 100%) (627/627, 100%)61222 3 (%)(8%) (16%) (29%)(4%) 4.2.2 ( , 9.5) 5. , , , 2008 4 4 . , 8% 6 . . . 1 , , , 3 , . 5 . 16% 12 3 , , , 4 80 . 29% 22 . . . 2 (113)99 14. , . . . [1] 28. [2] Eysenbach G., Consumer health informatics. .BMJ, vol.320(7251), pp.1713-1716, 2000. 2008 [3] , "2007 (503) (81 ", 2007.6.) [4] , , " , ", 97, pp.71-87, , 2004.11. .[5] , , , , , , "2007 , , ", 2007-23, . 2008. . [6] Chan B.L., Bakken S, Brown S.S., Houston T.K., Kreps G.L., Kukafta R, et al., "Bridging the digital divide:Reaching vulnerable populations." J, Am Med Infom Assoc, vol.11, no.6, pp.448-457, 2004. . [7] , " 85% ", 30 2008-6, pp.25-37, , 2008.6. [8] Jim Thatcher, Mark Urban, Michael Burks, . Cynthia Waddell, Shawn Henry, et al., (e-Exclusion) "Constructing Accessible Web Sites". Glasshaus, (e-Inclusion) 2002.(e-Accessibility) . [9] W3C, http://www.w3.org/WAI.(:2010.2) [10] , " ", http://www.med.or.jp/(2008. Less comfortable, more comfortable." ).(:2010.2) [11] , "2006 ", , 2006. [12] . "2005 ", , 2006.100 2010. 6 15. [13] . "2006 Cross Sectional Evaluation," Journal of Medical ", , 2007. Internet Research, Vol.6, No.2, e19, 2004.[14] . "2007 [24] Laura OGrady, "Accessibility compliance rates ", , 2008. of consumer-oriented Canadian health care Web[15] . "2008 sites, Informatics for Health and Social Care," ", , 2009. vol.30, Issue 4 , pp.287-295, December 2006.[16] , , " [25]Cristina Mancini, Monica Zedda & Annarita ", KADO Barbaro, "Health information in Italian public 31, vol.3 no.7, 2006. health websites: moving from inaccessibility to[17] Darell M. West, "Improving Technology accessibility," health information & libraries Utilization in Electronic Government around the journal, vol.22 issue.4, pp.276-285, Willy World," Governance Studies at BROOKINGS,InterScience, 2005. 2008. [26] , , "[18] Darrell M. West. "Globla E-Government 2007." Center for Public Policy, Brown University,", 2007.(Jananese Journal of public health), vol.55,[19] Mankoff, J., Fait, H., and Tran, T., "Is Yourno.2, pp.93-100, , 2008. Web Page Accessible? A Comparative Study of [27] , , , " Methods for Assessing Web Page Accessibility for the Blind", Proceedings of the SIGCHI2005, ", (Japan journal of April 2005, pp.41-50, 2005.medical informatics), vol.26, no.6, pp. 389-394,[20] Loiacono, E.T., "Cyberaccess:Web Accessibility , 2006. and Corporate America," Communications of [28] , " the ACM, Vol.47, No. 12, pp.83-87, December ", 06 2004., pp.89-94, [21] Sullivan, T. and Matson, R., "Barriers to, 2006. use:Usability and Content Accessibility on the[29] , , , , "Web Webs Most Popular Sites," Proceding s on theAccessibility for Elders and Physically or 2000 Conference on Universal Usability, pp.Cognitively Impaired Citizens-A Descriptive 139-144, November 2000.longitudinal analysis of government-related sites[22] Lchtenberg M, Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Sinanginin the republic of Korea", Report, Apr 2004. Y, Ohrloff C, Schalnus R., "Accessibility of[30] , " Health Information on the Internet to the ", , Visually Impaired User," Ophthalmologica vol.12, no.4, pp.33-44, 2005. vol.222, no.3, pp.187-193, 2008.[31] , , " [23] Zeng, X., Parmanto, B., "Web Content ", Accessibility of Consumer Health Information vol.7, no4, pp.224-233, 2007. Web Sites for People with Disabilities : A[32] , , , " (113) 101 16. ", [39] , 2 27 , 20(), 2008.3.7. pp.473-476, , 2007.[40] , [33] , , , " 2.0, , (accessibility) ",TTAK.OT-10.0003/R1, 2009.12.22. ,[41] , , pp.336-342, , 2006. , 2008 [34] , : , vol.9, no.2, pp.375-380, , Journal of digital , 2008.11.7. interaction design(DID), 6, pp.[42] Benyon, D., A. Crerar & A. Wikinson. A., 87-94, , 2007."Individual Difference and Inclusive Design."[35] . 2007 , pp.21-46 in Constantine Stephanidis (ed.). User 2007.5.23. .Interfaces for All: Concept, Methods, and[36] Oh Kun-seok, Kim Yong-seob, SurenderTools. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Kumar, Evaluation of web accessibility for Associates, Inc., 2001. people with disabilities in medical institute at [43] Microsoft Corporation, "Accessible Technology domestic and foreign, The Asian Journal of in Todays Business-case studies for success." Disable Sociology, vol.8, pp.73-90, The Asian Microsoft Press, 2002. Society of Disable Sociology, 2008.9.[44] Wikipedia."Web Accessibility."[37]KTV , 100http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_accessibility,, 6, 2009.8.5.2008. ( : 2010.2.)[38] , [45] Fujitsu. "FUJITSU : ",http://jp.fujitsu.com/accessibility/ [], , 09-44(373( : 2010.2.) ), , 2009.11.6.[46] Hitachi. http://www.hitachijoho.com/policy/webaccessibil ity.html. ( : 2010.2.)102 2010. 6 17. 1991 ()1998 ()()1999 2000 2001 ()()2002 : , , , etc.E-mail : [email protected] ()1998 ()2001 ( )()2002 : , , etc.E-mail : [email protected] (113)103