New Energy for an Ultra-modern Vietnam

Part 3: The ScienceSection C: Implications

June 2014 Saigon New Energy Group

To discuss this presentation and pose any questions you may have, please visit our website,

www.nangluongmoisaigon.org

Talking about the formation of galaxies and solar systems is a good way to move to our next topic, which is how New Energy science

helps us to re-think our cosmology.

There are at least four aspects of cosmology which New Energy science allows us to reformulate. These are:

• Dark energy• Unified Field Theory• Expansion of the universe after the “Big Bang”• Redshift of light from distant galaxies and stars

First, let’s talk about Dark Energy.

• “Dark Energy” has been postulated by cosmologists who believe that gravity is the fundamental force that determines the interactions of galaxies and stars.

They probably are so wedded to the idea that gravity controls these interactions due to the

fact that we can indeed see gravity controlling the Moon’s orbit around the Earth and the

Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

They made a big leap of faith by postulating that therefore, gravity must also control intergalactic and interstellar interactions

But remember the distinction we made earlier – that

“Gravitation plays the dominant role for internal interactions, while electromagnetism plays the dominant role for external interactions among unbounded systems.”

Because most cosmologists are failing to see the plasma-like interactions of galaxies and stars, they run into many difficulties trying to explain the universe using gravity.

For example:

Problems with the Gravitational Model for Celestial Mechanics

• Gravity can’t explain how galaxies formed in the first place

Problems with the Gravitational Model for Celestial Mechanics

• Gravity can’t explain how or why the first stars formed

Problems with the Gravitational Model for Celestial Mechanics

• Gravity can’t explain why the outer sections of the arms of a spiral galaxy spin around the center as fast as the inner sections of the spiral arms do.

Problems with the Gravitational Model for Celestial Mechanics

• The Gravitational Model predicts big variations in cosmic background radiation and the density of matter in the Universe… but observations have shown them to be quite uniform

In order to fill in the holes in their theory, these gravity-obsessed cosmologists have invented new terms in their equations for “Dark

Energy,” “Dark Matter,” etc. to make their equations “work”

And yet, no scientist and no scientific instrument has ever seen this “Dark Energy” or “Dark Matter”

Orthodox cosmologists try to explain the problem away by defining these things as inherently imperceivable

But this just makes Dark Energy and Dark Matter sound more and more like “fudge factors” invented by confused scientists

Now, scientists are beginning to think that ZPE can take the place of the postulated “Dark Energy”

There are many important consequences for cosmology if this is the case

For one, it would mean that there was no “Big Bang”

Instead, the physical Universe that we observe simply “bubbled up” from the transmuting ether

And the Universe formed – indeed, continues to be formed – largely by the principles of plasma physics

Which, as we have seen, are a key part of New Energy research

Yes, this process of bubbling up from the transmuting ether in our Physical Universe could still have had a beginning, but it may

not have been explosive

Second, these principles of plasma physics – in which gravity plays only a minor role, whereas electricity and magnetism play a greater role – work the same at

the level of the hydrogen atom as well as the level of two colliding galaxies

This allows us to move toward a reconciliation of General Relativity with Quantum Electrodynamics, i.e. a Unified

Field Theory

Third, it would mean that the Universe is not expanding in the way that conventional cosmology explains

Expansion of the Universe was considered “necessary” due to mainstream belief in

the Big Bang Theory

The conventional “Big Bang” view holds that very distant superclusters of galaxies are moving at near-light speeds

… and other things that seem rather implausible

The conventional view cites the increasing red-shift of light observed in very distant

stars and galaxies as evidence of the expansion of the Universe

However, New Energy science suggests that this red-shifting of light results from the fact that as photons travel through millions or billions of light-years of space,

they have a tendency to lose energy and drop back into the transmuting ether

Remember that as these photons fly through the vacuum of space, that vacuum

is not as empty as it initially appears

Instead, it is full of virtual particles.

And each time a photon hits a virtual particle, its energy is ever so slightly dissipated

Imagine you had to run a distance of >10 billion light years

Wouldn’t you get tired too?

We call this the “tired light hypothesis”

• It was made famous by Walther von Nernst in 1921

The tired light hypothesis didn’t attract many supporters in the twentieth century because people were mostly unaware of the existence of those

virtual particles which impeded a photon’s journey through space

However, now an increasing number of scientists, including Don Hotson and Paul LaViolette, are supporting a more well-

informed version of the tired-light theory

If the tired light theory is correct,

then it would explain why the

light from distant stars and galaxies

is red-shifted

In other words, the Doppler effect would not be responsible for red-shifting

And we could discard Hubble’s theory of the expanding universe

The consequence of this is hard to overstate:

There never was a Big Bang

Yes, my friends, we can finally retire that old, worn-out theory, which has been patched up more times than a 20-year-old pair of

blue jeans

Doesn’t it feel nice to get a new set of clothes?

So now we’ve seen how acknowledging the existence and role of ZPE in the Multiverse

allows us to revise our cosmology

• Zero Point Energy is the “Dark Energy”• No more Big Bang Theory• Tired light explains red-shifting of light• We can finally unify Quantum Electrodynamics

and General Relativity