FINANCIAL OVERVIEW –Lessons learned

2009 - 2013

2009-2013

63 MILLION EURO

Globally Raised

Locally Raised

In Kind

40 million

10 million

12.6 million

(48 million)

(6.4 million)

(?? million)

FINANCIAL RESOURCES 2009-2013 (2004-2008)

35 m core 35 m core

4 RWP 84%

3 RWP 62%

Globally Raised40 million FINANCIAL PARTNERS

Austria

China

Denmark

European Commission

France - secondments

Germany

Netherlands

Norway

Sweden

Switzerland

UK

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

465

23

781

74

0

400

1,900

525

2,212

1,088

0

434

30

935

496

0

400

2,600

0

2,297

379

3,648

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

3 donors 2/3 of Globally raised

3 donors 70% of coreNEW

LOST

Locally Raised10 million

CACENA CAF CAM CAR CEE CHINA EAF MED SAM SAS SAF SEA WAF0

200

400

600

800

1000

12002009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Vs 13.5 million core funds

In Kind12.6 Million

FINANCIAL RESOURCES 2009-2013

CAM CAR CEE CHINA SAM SAS SEA Cacena CAF WAF EAF MED SAF GWPO 0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

2009-2013 63 MILLION EURO

Prepared > 200 Budgets and Work Plans

Produced > 400 financial reports + locally raised

Survived > 100 annual audits + CIDA audit

Closed > PAWDII Programme, USAID, PIWAG Programme, FWG…

Started > WACDEP, SITWA, ......

8

FUTURE -> -> ->-> -> -> -> -> ->

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 B2014 E2015 E20160

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

8,545

7,311

5,412

7,488

11,432

17,250

20,000 20,000

1,765996

2,972 2,337 2,100

3,0004,000

5,000

GLOBALLY RAISED LOCALLY RAISED

Income in 000´Euro

9

LESSONS LEARNED ?????????????????????Core funds to remain/decrease project funding?

The global funding base is vulnerable broaden the base?

Bilateral donors only + EC need to change to become attractive?

Network´s fundraising skills uneven allocate resources + incentives?

All time low/all time high = organizational stress stability priority?

Start up & implementation of projects learn from the past

Governance Review to provide some answers

10

EXPENDITURE DISTRIBUTION

2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

20% 21% 18% 20% 17%

5%5%

7%8%

6%

5%7%

8%8%

7%

28%

33%30%

36% 47%

22%

18%

2%

1%

5%

18%12%

33%24%

15%

Programme activities Locally raised

Programme activities Designated funds

Programme activities Regional core

Network Operations

Global Tec&/Knowledge M.

Governing bodies

Global Secretariat