View
701
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lambert Heller ICSTI 2015: ITOC workshop on Open Science and Open Data
July 4th, 2015
Data sovereignity for researchers, open data for everyone – the VIVO approach to CRIS
About me
2 2
• I’m working for academic libraries since 2004. • 2013 I kicked off TIB “Open Science Lab”, a small
interdisciplinary team. • Context: Leibniz Research Alliance Science 2.0 • The net enables research to be more open and
collaborative. Together with researchers communities, we examine and cultivate new opportunities. Last not least: Which specific problems may libraries help to solve?
• More: @Lambo and http://biblionik.de/about-me/
A person-centric view on research metadata
3
„Profile“ view supports competition & collaboration
Researcher
Iden,ty
Research products
Social graph(s)
Impact data
Research area(s)
Ins,tu,onal role(s)
Scholarly profiles: Three and a half approaches
• Target audience: Publishers, orgs & individuals • Value proposition:Disambiguate authors & aggregate
info on one hub available to all • Business model: Multi-stakeholder operation • Data reusability: High
4
1. ORCID
Scholarly profiles: Three and a half approaches
• Target audience: Individual researchers • Value proposition:Conveniently reach out
& connect on the web • Business model: Commercial service • Data reusability: Low
5
2. ResearchGate, academia.edu et al
Scholarly profiles: Three and a half approaches
• Target audience: Research administration • Value proposition:Analyse, report & manage your
institutional research portfolio • Business model: Commercial software & services
• Data reusability: Low (often not even on public web)
6
3.a TR Converis, Elsevier Pure and similar CRIS
Scholarly profiles: Three and a half approaches
• Target audience: Research admins & individuals • Value proposition:Publish & connect academic
institutions’ profile data • Business model: Open source software & standards
• Data reusability: High (complements or even replaces 3.a)
7
3.b VIVO & other Linked Open Data based profiles
Scholarly profiles: Three and a half approaches
• Target audience: Research admins & individuals • Value proposition:Publish & connect academic
institutions’ profile data • Business model: Open source software & standards
• Data reusability: High (complements or even replaces 3.a)
8
3.b VIVO & other Linked Open Data based profiles
Hint: Next week I‘ll publish a
more detailed version of this
comparison on the LSE „impact
of social sciences“ blog.
Scholarly profiles: What young researchers look for
9
Some results from my DHI Paris workshop last month
What else do we do with VIVO?
• ...invite for a much anticipated first german workshop for VIVO users on September 9th this year
• ...match the upcoming official german CRIS standard „Kerndatensatz Forschung“ with VIVO ontologies
• ...advice & collaborate with institutes from Leibniz Association, maybe towards a large-scale VIVO based aggregation of german researcher profiles.
• Ina Blümel (eScience professor HsH Hannover) leads our VIVO development efforts with students, thereby growing a new generation of „linked data librarians“.
15
Currently, we...
Some questions and challenges
• ...all CRIS subjects and objects have PIDs, including objects and relations that are institution-specific? (cf. Den Haag Manifesto 2011)
• ...project ideas, grant proposals, running projects etc. can be well represented in a scholarly profile? („Realtime information“ on a researchers activity)
• ...small contributions and conversations scattered all over the web are timely, automatically captured within a researchers profile? (ORCID OAuth & push API?)
16
How can we make sure that...