Upload
archel-francisco
View
139
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
State of Local Governance Performance Report
determines how the fundamentals of good
governance such as Participation,
Transparency and Accountability are valued
in the LGU. It is assessed based on key areas of governance.
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
(1)Administrative Governance,(2) Social Governance,
(3)Economic Governance, and(4)Environmental Governance.
(5) Valuing Fundamentals of Good Governance
Five (5) Areas of Governance
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Administrative Governance
Local Legislation, Development Planning, Revenue Generation, Resource Allocation and Utilization, Customer Service, and Human Resource Management
and Development
Six Areas
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Area(s) with Excellent
Performance
Performance
DescriptionInterpretation
Customer Service - CivilApplications
5 - HIgh Seamless delivery and ease ofobtaining frontline services areprincipal in civil registry and realproperty documents.
Human Resource Management and
Development
5 - HIgh Managing the human resource isgeared towards a desired endwhich is "desirable organizationalperformance and productivity".
Priority Area for
Improvement
Performance
Description
Interpretation
Resource Allocation and Utilization3.83
Fair
Management and coordination processes for budgeting and
accounting are in place. However, these processes need to
be revisited and improved. They are guarantees to an
effective allocation and optimum utilization of financial
resources.
Local Legislation4.20
High but not Excellent
The imperatives of quality legislation have to be looked
into. This might mean looking into legislative staff
competence and the greater use of legislative tools such
agenda development, legislative tracking, backstopping
committee and legislative performance.
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Priority Area for
Improvement
Performance
Description
Interpretation
Revenue Generation4.67
High but not Excellent
Existing measures in support of revenue generation need to be
enhanced. This is an initial yet essential step in maximizing revenue
generation potentials.
Development Planning4.91
High but not Excellent
Improvements in the following areas are underscored: (a)
organizational performance; (b) consultation process; and (c)
management of planning database. These areas are instrumental in
quality land use and development planning, or lack of it.
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Area(s) with Excellent
Performance
Performance
DescriptionInterpretation
Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management 5 - High
Appropriate structure and plan for community and child protection
are established. Funding and other essential support for protective
services and the Katarungang Pambarangay are ensured. Crime
incidence is reduced, and most if not all interpersonal disputes are
immediately and amicably settled. The Local Disaster Coordinating
Council is functional - which is a measure of disaster-
preparedness.There is a high level of readiness to respond to, or
manage, the risks attendant in a disaster or calamity - including relief
and rehabilitation.
Support to Housing and Basic Utilities5 - High
An administrative mechanism dedicated to addressing the multiple
requirements of housing services is in place. Mass housing project
and donation of lots for socialized housing are twin-response to the
housing backlog.
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Area(s) with Excellent
Performance
Performance
DescriptionInterpretation
Support to Housing and Basic Utilities5 - High
An administrative mechanism dedicated to addressing the
multiple requirements of housing services is in place. Mass
housing project and donation of lots for socialized housing
are twin-response to the housing backlog.
Support to Education Services5 - High
Truly effective support to basic education. The LSB is
functional. Principally, the SEF is used where it should be
utilized in the first place - school facilities, educational
research, additional classrooms and teachers, scholarship
program. Supplementary allocation from the General Fund
is an added value in favor of the education sector.
Priority Area for
Improvement
Performance
Description
Interpretation
Health Services4.97
High but not Excellent
The overall quality of the local health system deserves a second look.
This is so because performance falls short in certain aspects. The
principal support system on this matter is the Local Health Board. It
might have to do more.
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Area(s) with Excellent
Performance
Performance
DescriptionInterpretation
None of the 2 areas in EconomicGovernance marked "excellentperformance" so far. Meantime,dedicate more time and effort onthe areas for improvement.
Priority Area for
Improvement
Performance
Description
Interpretation
Entrepreneurship, Business and
Industry Promotion
4.50
High but not Excellent
More need to be done to institutionalize a business-friendly environment.
Support to Agriculture Sector4.67
High but not Excellent
Local government support is extended to the Agriculture
Sector. But greater intervention is necessary.
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Area(s) with Excellent
Performance
Performance
DescriptionInterpretation
Freshwater Ecosystems Management 5 - high
Freshwater ecosystem management is of
importance to the LGU. Long-term planning is
valued. CSO and citizen participation are
recognized and are mobilized in fresh water
protection and rehabilitation. Areas for
rehabilitation and protection are set, and that target
areas for rehabilitation and protection are met.
Priority Area for
Improvement
Performance
Description
Interpretation
Urban Ecosystems Management 4.00
High but not Excellent
Pollution control and proper solid waste management are
essential in preserving the integrity of the environment.
More need to be done. To gain better performance in this
area, consider the following:
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Area(s) with Excellent
Performance
Performance
DescriptionInterpretation
Transparency 5 - high
Transparency in governmental operations is remarkable.
Communicating to the public through various means, i.e., Bulletin
Board, Public Information Office or Desk, print, broadcast media,
website, and forum, is valued.
Participation 5 - high
Engaging the citizens and CSOs in local governance has achieved an
admirable level of maturity. Proofs to this are CSO participation in
decision-making through the Local Special Bodies, CSO
involvement in local development projects and Citizens Feedback.
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Priority Area for
Improvement
Performance
Description
Interpretation
Financial Accountability4.92
High but not Excellent
Efforts to improve financial accountability are
acknowledged. However, administrative capacity to ensure
observance of guidelines relative to accounting, internal
control, procurement and financial transactions need to be
strengthened.
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
e-SLDR is an approximation of the state of
socio-economic and environmental
development in a locality. The result is
based on LGU self-assessment or
estimates of key development indicators.
National target, average and expert
inference are used as benchmarks.
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
(1)Social Development(2) Economic Development
(3)Environmental Development
Three (3) Areas of Development
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Social Development (4.62)
Social development is determined using quality of life and
minimum basic needs indicators, such as:
a. Health and Nutrition,
b. Education,
c. Housing and Basic Needs, and
d. Peace and Security
It is affected by both the state of the economy and environmental
quality.
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Description on Social Development
1.State of Health and Nutrition
Indicator Interpretation GuidePercentage (%) of childrenbelow normal weights.
Condition: Children nutrition, in general, is assured.
MTPDP 2010 Target is
exceptionally met. Sustain! Zero incidence of
malnutrition is ideal but desirable
LGU Data: 10 % or below
Benchmark: should not exceed 25%
Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 21.6%; 2005
National Average - 24.6%
:
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Detailed Description on Social Development
1.State of Health and Nutrition
Morbidity Rate Condition: Morbidity rates for the identified leading illnesses, in general, arewithin acceptable conditions. The challenge is, at the very least, to keep therates lower (if zero prevalence is not attainable) than the national targets.LGU Data: Collated morbidity rate for specific illnesses, i.e., Tuberculosis, HIV,Malaria, Heart diseases, Diarrhea, Dengue, is between the index of 3 - 3.99Benchmark: should not be lower than the 2010 Target (specific targets arecontained in the Data Capture Form)Reference: MTPDP and National Objectives for Health
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Detailed Description on Social Development
1.State of Health and Nutrition
Crude death rate Condition: Crude death rate is low. Local situation is better than the national.The lower the rate, the better.LGU Data: 2 - 3 per 1, 000 populationBenchmark: 4 - 5 per 1,000 populationReference: National Ave. - 4.8 per 1,000 population based on 2000 Census
Maternal mortality rate Condition: Maternal mortality is not an issue. The situation is far better than thenational situation. Sustain programs that ensure maternal and child care.LGU Data: 0.3 or below per 1,000 live birthsBenchmark: 0.7 - 0.9 per 1,000 live birthsReference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 0.9 (converted from 100,000 to 1,000 livebirths)
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Detailed Description on Social Development
1.State of Health and NutritionInfant mortality rate Condition: Infant mortality is currently not a problem. Local condition is far
better than the national.LGU Data: 0 -5 per 1,000 live birthsBenchmark: 15-17 per 1,000 live birthsReference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 17 per 1,000 live births. 2003 National Ave -29 per 1,000 live births (Source: 2003 National Demographic and HealthSurvey)
Children mortality
rate (under 5
yrs. old)
Condition: Children mortality rate in the LGU is far better than the nationalsituation. Sustain programs that ensure child care.LGU Data: 10 or below per 1,000 live birthsBenchmark: 30 - 33 per 1,000 live birthsReference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 32.24 per 1,000 live births . 2003 NationalAve. - 40 per 1,000 live births
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
State of Education
Indicator Interpretation Guide
Elementary Participation Rate
Condition: Elementary participation rate is very high. Rate is definitely higherthan the 2010 Target. Access to primary education is assured.LGU Data: 98 % or aboveBenchmark: 92 - 94%Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 93%
Elementary Completion Rate
Condition: Elementary completion rate is very high. Sustaining primaryeducation is of importance.LGU Data: 96 % and aboveBenchmark: 78 - 88%Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 78%
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
State of Education
Secondary Completion
Rate
Condition: Secondary completion rate is very high. Secondary educationappears to be well supported.LGU Data: 96 % or aboveBenchmark: 71 - 84%Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 71.5%
Tertiary or Technical
Education Completion
Rate
Condition: Tertiary or Technical Education Completion Rate is low. Quality ofhuman capital is an issue.LGU Data: 25 - 50%Benchmark: 50-75%Reference: Target estimate
Simple Literacy Rate
Condition: Simple literacy rate is very high.LGU Data: 98 % or aboveBenchmark: 92-94%Reference: National Ave. - 92.8, 2000 Census
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
State of Housing and Basic Utilities
Indicator Interpretation Guide
% of non-owner households
Condition: Extent of house & lot ownership is high.LGU Data: 11 -24 %Benchmark: 25 - 34%Reference: National Ave. - 33.5% (Source: NSO, 2002 Poverty IndicatorSurvey, Preliminary Result)
% of squatter or informal
dwellers
Condition: The size of the informal dweller-population is negligible.LGU Data: 5 % or belowBenchmark: Should be lower than 21%Reference: Target estimate
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
State of Housing and Basic Utilities
Percentage (%) of
households with makeshift
houses.
Condition: Households with makeshift houses exist in the area. But themagnitude is lower than the national situation.LGU Data: 2 % or below but not 0Benchmark: This condition should not exist.Reference: 2000 National Ave . - 2.04% (Source: PIDS)
% of households with
access to piped-in water
(level III)
supply for LGUs outside
Metro and non-HUCs
Condition: Majority of the HHs have easy access to water supply (piped-in).That situation is far better than most of the LGUs outside Metro Manila andHUCs.LGU Data: above 70 %Benchmark: should be greater than 35% for LGUs outside Metro Manila andnon-HUCsReference: 2001 National Ave. for both urban and rural areas - 34.3% (Source:National Objective for Health, DOH)
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
State of Housing and Basic Utilities
% of households with sanitary
toilet facility for LGUs outside
Metro and non-HUCs.
Condition: The situation is far better than the target for rural areas or thebenchmark for LGUs outside of Metro Manila and HUCs. Water pollution due todomestic wastes and its effect to public health is not an issue.LGU Data: 97 - 100 %Benchmark: should be at least 86% for LGUs outside Metro Manila andnon-HUCsReference: 2010 Target - 86% for rural areas (Source: National Objective forHealth, DOH)
% of households with
electricity for LGUs outside
Metro and non-HUCs.
Condition: The situation is far better than the 2002 national average for ruralareas or the benchmark for LGUs outside of Metro Manila and HUCs.LGU Data: 91 -100 %Benchmark: should be higher than 78% for LGUs outside Metro Manila andnon-HUCsReference: 2002 National Ave. - 79% for rural areas (Source: NSO, PovertyIndicator Survey)
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
State of Peace and Order
Indicator Interpretation Guide
Incidence of index crime
Condition: Incidence of index crime such as murder, homicide, physical injury,rape,robbery and theft is very low.LGU Data: less than 1 per 10,000 populationBenchmark: 5 - 6 per 10,000 populationReference: 2005 National Ave. - 5.26 per 10,000 population (Source: NSCB.Adjusted from 100,000 to 10,000 population)
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
State of Peace and Order
Incidence of non-index crime
Condition: Incidence of non-index crime such as crimes against nationalsecurity, fundamental laws of the state, public order, public morals, violations ofspecial laws, illegal gambling, illegal possession of firearms, carnapping, illegaldrugs, kidnapping, serious illegal detention, and smuggling is very low.LGU Data: less than 1 per 10,000 populationBenchmark: 3 - 4 per 10,000 populationReference: 2005 National Ave. - 3.84 per 10,000 population (Source: NSCB.Adjusted from 100,000 to 10,000 population)
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Economic Development (3.50)
Economic development is determined by indicators of
employment and income. Economic activities have the capacity to
greatly affect the quality of the environment. Well-managed
economic growth does not pollute the environment and does not
destructively exploit and irreversibly damage natural resources.
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Description on Economic Development
1.State of Employment
Indicator Interpretation GuideUnemployment rate.
Underemployment rate
Condition: Unemployment rate is within acceptable level.LGU Data: 6 -7 %Benchmark: should not be higher than 7%Reference: National Ave. - 6.3% (Source: October 2007 Survey, NSO)
Condition: Underemployment rate is highLGU Data: 21 - 30%Benchmark: should not be higher than 20%Reference: National Ave. - 18.1% (Source: October 2007 Survey, NSO
:
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Description on Economic Development
1.State of Income
Indicator Interpretation GuideIncome Per Capita
Poverty Incidence for LGUsoutside Metro Manila andnon-HUCs.
Condition: Income per capita is a little higher than the calculated nationalaverage.LGU Data: 36, 000 - 50,000 per yearBenchmark: should not be lower than PhP 35,000 per yearReference: Calculated National Ave. - PhP34,600 (Source: 2006 data, NSO)Condition: Poverty incidence is low.LGU Data: below 10 %Benchmark: 26 - 35 %Reference: National Ave. - 26.9% (2006 Poverty Statistics, NSCB)
:
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Environmental Development (3.00)
Environmental development is determined using environmental
quality indicators such as the land, air and water quality and
natural resources indicators describing agricultural, forest and
aquatic resources productivity. The result depends on the type of
ecosystem in the LGU.
e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report
Description on Environmental Development
1.State of Urban Ecosystems
Indicator Interpretation Guide% of tree cover in urban areas(cities and town centers)
% of polluting industries.
Condition: Tree cover in urban areas falls short with the
desirable condition. Air
quality is at stake
LGU Data: less than 10%
Benchmark: should be at least 20%
Reference: Local Development Watch Manual
Condition: No polluting industries. Better air quality in urban
areas is expected.
LGU Data: All industries have pollution control facilities.
Benchmark: All industries should have pollution control
facilities
Reference: Local Development Watch Manual (as indicated
by an environment specialist)
1.State of Urban Ecosystems
Indicator Interpretation Guide
Absence of smog, odor andnoise in urban areas (citiesand town centers).
Presence of solid waste heapson roadsides and vacant lotsand in urban lands (cities andtown centers).
Condition: Air quality is uncomfortable.LGU Data: Few cases of smog, occasional odor and slightly disturbing noiselevelBenchmark: Absence of smog, odor and noise in cities or town centersReference: Local Development Watch Manual (as indicated by an environmentspecialist)
Condition: Sanitation in the urban land area is somewhat an issue.LGU Data: Presence of solid waste heaps are observed in some spots andsites along roadsides and vacant lotsBenchmark: This situation should not occurReference: Local Development Watch Manual
Indicator Interpretation Guide% of irrigated land to totalirrigable lands.
% of prime lands converted tonon-agricultural uses for CCsand 1st - 3rd classmunicipalities.
Crop yield.
Condition: Maximum effort on agricultural land development and very highpossibility to increase agricultural land productivity.LGU Data: 81- 100 %Benchmark: 40-50%Reference: National Ave. - 46% (Source: Status of Irrigation Development, NIA,December, 2006)
Condition: Prime agricultural land is sustained.LGU Data: 10 % or belowBenchmark: should not be higher than 10%Reference: Section 20, LGC of 1991
Condition: Crop production indicates average agricultural land productivity.LGU Data: 3 - 3.99Benchmark: An index of 3, meaning the average yield for top 3 crops reachedthe national average for crop production. ( see Data Capture Form as reference)Reference: Crop Statistics of the Philippines, Bureau of Agricultural Statistics,Department of Agriculture, August 2007
2. State of Agricultural Ecosystems
3. State of Freshwater Ecosystems
Indicator Interpretation GuideFish catch in river or lake.
Presence of pollutingindustries in riverside orlakeside.
Condition: Fish catch in river or lake has decreased over the past five yearsLGU Data: Fish catch in river or lake is decreasingBenchmark: Should be stable or increasingReference: Local Development Watch
Condition: Presence of polluting industries in riverside or lakeside.LGU Data: 1 or more industries have no pollution control facilitiesBenchmark: All industries should have pollution control facilitiesReference: Local Development Watch
Indicator Interpretation GuideFreshwater quality.
Extent of riverside or lakesidesquatters.
Condition: Freshwater quality is poor.LGU Data: Water is turbid (light brown to brown color) with some floatingwastesBenchmark: Water should be clear, without water lilies and/or floating wastesReference: Local Development Watch
Condition: Many squatter households are observed on riverside or lakeside.It’s a social and environment issue.LGU Data: 21 - 100 houses per km stretch on riverside or lakesideBenchmark: Should not be more than 20Reference: Local Development Watch
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
This Report provides a practical tool to gauge Cabuyaofinancial performance as compared to financialperformance of all LGUs within the same LGU type andincome class..
Two Parts:(1) Revenue Generation, and
(2) Resource Allocation and Utilization.
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Revenue Generation
Exceptional performance:
Lower for both conditions: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income
class, (2)national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Desired performance:
Should be lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Revenue Generation
Exceptional performance:
Locally-sourced revenues to total income is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the
same LGU type and income class, (2)national average of the same LGU type regardless
of income class
Desired performance:
Locally-sourced revenues to total income should be higher than the average of LGUs
with the same LGU type and income class
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Revenue Generation
Exceptional performance:
It is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)
national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Revenue Generation
Exceptional performance:
It is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)
national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Revenue Generation
Exceptional performance:
It is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)
national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Revenue Generation
Exceptional performance:
It is lower than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)
national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Resource Allocation and Utilization
Exceptional performance:
Met these three conditions: (1) lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and
income class, (2) lower than national average of LGUs with the same LGU type regardless of
income class, (3) Did not exceed the 45-55 ceiling for P.S.
Desired performance:
Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budget allocation LGU type and
income class. Should not exceed with the ceiling as mandated by law, i.e., for 1st - 3rd class LGUs
- 45%, for 4th - 6th class LGUS - 55%.
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Resource Allocation and Utilization
Exceptional performance:
It is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)national
average of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Financial Performance, Electronic Report
Resource Allocation and Utilization
Desired performance:
Should not exceed 20% of the regular income. That is the debt servicing limitation set for
under LG Code of 1991.
e-SLDR
CORE DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES
STATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Cab
uy
ao
State of Education - Tertiary or Technical Education
completion rate is low . Quality of Human
capital is an issue.
State of Employment -Underemployment rate is high
State of Employment - Underemployment rate is highState of Employment - Underemployment rate is high
e-SLDR
State of Urban Ecosystems - Tree cover in urban areas falls short
with the desirable condition. Air quality is at stake; Air
quality is uncomfortable.
State of Freshwater Ecosystems - Fish catch in river or lake has
decreased over the past five years ; Presence of polluting
industries in riverside or lakeside. ; Freshwater quality is
poor. ; Many squatter households are observed on
riverside or lakeside. It’s a social and environment issue.
Note: Core Development Challenges are those development
indicators where the LGU failed to achieve the minimum or
acceptable condition, and got an equivalent development
index of "2" or "1"
STATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Cab
uy
ao
e-SLDR
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
INTERDEPENDENCIES
1
2
3
5
The plot helps to determine which sector needs special attention, or which needs to be sustained.
STATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Green line - Ideal level of development
(DI: 5)
Red line - Danger Zone (DI: 3)
Blue line - LGU development index
Cab
uy
ao
e-SLDRSTATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
INTERDEPENDENCIES
Socio-economic and environment are inter-dependent. A healthy and good
quality human resource (labor force) is a productive working force that
breeds a healthy economy and one that recognizes the value of
environmental quality. A well-managed economy sustains the productivity of
natural endowments and the life support system needed to build a health
society. Well-conserved natural resources provide communities with a
sustainable source of livelihood and income and thus improve their
economic welfare. Clean environment and good economy ensure the quality
of life.
Cab
uy
ao
e-SLDRSTATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
INTERDEPENDENCIES
In brief, recognizing these interdependencies is about
understanding human life.
Every action or inaction corresponds to great benefits or serious
problems in the future.
The future of next generation lies in our hands.
.
It is, therefore, important that these three sectors are equally
given importance to achieve a balanced and sustained
development.
Cab
uy
ao