51
Melinda Koslow & Celia Haven Great Lakes Regional Center National Wildlife Federation [email protected] [email protected] Jill Ryan Freshwater Future [email protected] Wednesday September 12, 2012 Climate-Smart Restoration Success: Local and Landscape Scale Examples and Tools

Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Melinda Koslow & Celia Haven

Great Lakes Regional Center

National Wildlife Federation

[email protected]

[email protected]

Jill Ryan

Freshwater Future

[email protected]

Wednesday September 12, 2012Climate-Smart Restoration Success: Local and Landscape Scale

Examples and Tools

Page 2: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Order of Workshop

1. Landscape-Scale Process & Example

2. Online Tools Demo

3. Community-Scale Process & Example

Page 3: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Is Your Coastal Restoration Project

Climate-Smart?

6-step Guidelines for the Great Lakes

download a copy at:

http://www.nwf.org/glcoastalfuture

Page 4: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 5: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Testing Guidance On-The-Ground & Getting Results

Page 6: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

512 acres, jobs created,

$1.3 million in GLRI

Page 7: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Restore or enhance 512 acres of habitat to emergent wetland, bottom and upland forest, sedge meadow and grassland, providing hydrologic reconnection to Lake Erie within the Maumee AOC and in a Globally Important Bird Area. Restoration work is currently starting and will conclude in 2013.

Lake Erie

Page 8: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

91-acre Helle tract, reforesting approximately 53 acres of uplands and floodplain and restoring 16 acres of wetlands

Page 9: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 10: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Step One: Identify Restoration Goals and Targets

• Restore water quality

• Enlarge floodplain

• Increase wildlife and migratory bird stopover habitat

• Fish passage

Page 11: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 12: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Step Two: Identify Restoration Project Approaches

• Take 53 acres of agricultural land out of production and reforested

• Plant native species known to be favored by migrating landbirds, such as dogwood, hackberry, oak, and willow

Page 13: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 14: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Key Climate-Smart Questions

• Given the life span of trees (50-100 years and beyond), under what climate scenarios should we prepare?

• Is it too early to consider planting species of a different range?

• Is it more urgent to plan for increasing air temperatures or uncertain precipitation conditions?

Page 15: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Step Three: Assess Vulnerability of Targets/Project Approaches to Climate Change

1. Sensitivity of species or ecosystem2. Exposure of species or ecosystem to

climate change3. Adaptive Capacity – ability of

species or ecosystem to deal with, survive through or adapt to changes

Find Scanning the Conservation Horizon at www.nwf.org/vulnerabilityguide

Page 16: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Bl

Assessing VulnerabilityCurrently looking at vulnerability of four different species (as requested by project partners)

4. Black Willow

1. Flowering Dogwood 2. Bur Oak

3. Pin Oak

Page 17: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Sensitivity - Water

4. Black Willow

1. Flowering Dogwood 2. Bur Oak

3. Pin Oak

Thrive in moist, well-drained areas

Thrive in flood plains and swampy areas

Thrive in swampy, low lands of forested areas and seasonal standing water

Thrive in wetlands and alongside streams and rivers, as well as marshy areas

Page 18: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Sensitivity - Range1. Flowering Dogwood 2. Bur Oak

Page 19: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Sensitivity - Range3. Pin Oak 4. Black Willow

Page 20: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Exposure

Climate Change Impacts of Concern (as a result of climate drivers exercise with local land managers)

– Seiche (high wind, innundation)

– Summer drought– Spring flooding,

runoff to Lake Erie– Year-long warmer

air temps

Photo courtesy of NOAA

Page 21: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 22: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Exposure –Spring Precipitation

Maps generated on Climate Wizard, High A2, Ensemble Model www.climatewizard.orgBase climate projections downscaled by Maurer et al., (2007) Santa Clara University.

Spring Precip Change Next 40 years Spring Precip Change Next 70 years

Models in agreement on increases of precipitation spring over next 70 years.Intensity and duration will also be a large factor to consider.

Page 23: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Exposure - TemperatureMaps generated on Climate Wizard, High A2, Ensemble Model www.climatewizard.orgBase climate projections downscaled by Maurer et al., (2007) Santa Clara University.

Annual Temp Change Next 40 years Annual Temp Change Next 70 years

Models show annual warming temperatures of 4.5 ºF to 6.5 ºF over next 70 years.

Page 24: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Exposure –Summer DroughtMaps generated on Climate Wizard, High A2, Ensemble Model www.climatewizard.orgBase climate projections downscaled by Maurer et al., (2007) Santa Clara University.And Hayhoe et al. (2010) Regional Climate Change Projections for Chicago and the US Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research.

Summer Precip Change Next 40 years – Hayhoe paper (SRES A1)

Summer Precip Change Next 40 years – Climate Wizard (SRES A2)

Page 25: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Adaptive Capacity

USFS Climate Change Tree Atlas

Prasad, A. M., L. R. Iverson., S. Matthews., M. Peters. 2007-ongoing. A Climate Change Atlas for 134 Forest Tree Species of the Eastern United States [database]. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/tree, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Delaware, Ohio.

Page 26: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Adaptive Capacity1. Flowering Dogwood

Dogwood Model Reliability: High

Looks fairly safe

Page 27: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Adaptive Capacity

2. Bur Oak

Could summertime precip changes be to blame?

Bur Oak Model Reliability: Medium

Page 28: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Adaptive Capacity3. Pin Oak

Pin Oak Model Reliability: Medium

Page 29: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Adaptive Capacity4. Black Willow Black Willow Model Reliability: Low

Page 30: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 31: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Step Four: Identify Climate-Smart Options

• Strategies that reduce sensitivity or exposure, or enhance adaptive capacity

– Plant a diversity of species and ages that can tolerate a range of flow conditions (pin oak) and disturbances like heat waves or drought (flowering dogwood)

– Enhance riparian vegetation to cool surrounding air temperatures

– Reduce exposure to flooding by enhancing wetlands upstream

– In cases of extreme drought, a nearby water pump system could be used until trees are established

– Prevent disease and pests, if possible

Page 32: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 33: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Step Five: Select and Implement Management Options – Results!

Of Relevance to this Project:• Urgency – moderate to high

• Costs of climate-smart seed selection same as typical seed selection

• Technical Feasibility - high• Performance under uncertainty – water

management upstream• Availability of resources – donated box culvert

• Ability to re-plant if necessary

Page 34: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 35: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Step Six: Monitor, Review, Revise

QAPP plan may include: • Streamgaging – water depth and

volume• Phenological and composition changes, esp. avian• Tree species survival rates• Weather station(s)/Climate Information

– Anemometer helps identify potential seiche events – Measured air and precipitation temperatures provide a

daily (weather) and yearly, long-term (climate) record, can inform NWS Cleveland

– Build relationship with Ohio state climatologist

Review and revise with future vulnerability assessments, as climate and ecosystem models improve

Page 36: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Testing Guidance On-The-Ground & Getting Results

1250 linear feet of fish habitat, $350,000 in

GLRI

Page 37: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 38: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 39: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 40: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Upcoming

Updates include: monitoring section, plant selection, and case studies

Page 41: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Thank you! Melinda Koslow, Regional Program Manager [email protected]

Page 42: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

How to find what you’re looking for?

Online Climate Change Resources

Led by Celia Haven, [email protected]

Page 43: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Online Climate Change Resources

• Modeled Impacts/Vulnerabilities

• News and Blogs• Case Studies and

Knowledge Sharing• Historical Climate Info• Future Climate Change

Scenarios

Page 44: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Online Climate Change Resources

• CanVis:– http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/tools/canvis/

• U.S. Forest Service Climate Change Tree Atlas:– http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/tree/tree_atlas.html

Page 45: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 46: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

West Grand Boulevard

Collaborative

Page 47: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 48: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 49: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012
Page 50: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Considering Climate isn’t new work to be done, it is a new way of working

1. Think about how your work could be impacted by the effects of climate change

2. Assess the information you have

3. Brainstorm how you can incorporate climate adaptation activities based on what you know about climate change

4. Start taking action, monitor your effectiveness, and talk with others to ensure your work will provide the desired impact

Page 51: Climate Smart Restoration Success-Koslow, Haven and Ryan, 2012

Jill Ryan, Executive Director231.348.8200 [email protected]

View our Climate RFP at:www.freshwaterfuture.org/grants

Thank you Kresge Foundation for your support and EcoAdapt for your expertise!