Upload
nithya-ravi
View
190
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WITH REFERENCE TO THE NOODLES BRAND
“MAGGI’’ AND “TOP RAMEN’’
INTRODUCTION
• Brand Equity is defined as “The commercial
value that derives from consumer perception of
the brand name of a particular product or
service, rather than from the product or service
itself”.
• Brand equity refers to the value of a brand.
DIMENSIONS OF BRAND EQUITY
Customer based brand equity is defined as the value that
consumers associate with a brand (Aaker 1991).
CUSTOMER BASED
BRAND EQUITY
DIMENSIONS
BRAND
LOYALTY
PERCEIVED
QUALITY
BRAND
ASSOCIATION
BRAND
AWARENESS
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
• To analyse the various dimensions of Brand
Equity with reference to two brands of noodles
“Maggi” and “Top Ramen” on a comparative
basis.
• To examine relationship among the four
dimensions of Brand Equity with reference to
two brands of noodles “Maggi” and “Top
Ramen”.
METHODOLOGY
• Study Area - The study covers Female college students in Chennai city .
• Sample Size - 50 respondents
• Sampling Method Used - Convenience Sampling
• Data Sources - The study is based on primary data that has been collected using a structured questionnaire.
• Questionnaire- The structured questionnaire consists of twelve sub factors measured by thirty-six statements
• Statistical Tool Used- Weighted Mean and Correlation techniques are used to analyse the data collected using
MS Excel and SPSS 20.0
• Level of significance- Tests are carried out at 5% and 1% level of the significance.
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
• Due to paucity of time sample size has been
restricted to 50
• The study is made only with respect to two
noodles brand “Maggi” and “Top Ramen”
DATA ANALYSIS
WEIGHTED MEAN-BRANDAWARENESSS.NO STATEMENTS MAGGI TOP
RAMEN
BRAND RECOGNITION 3.83 3.28
1 I am aware of all the products offered by this brand 4.02 3.22
2 I have an excellent opinion on this brand 3.30 3.26
3 I can recognize this brand among other competitive brands 4.16 3.36
BRAND RECALL 4.11 3.12
4 I don’t have difficulty in imagining this brand in my mind 4.08 3.52
5 I can easily recall the slogan of this brand 4.00 2.76
6 I know how this brand logo looks like 4.24 3.08
BRAND FAMILIARITY 4.36 3.78
7 This brand is always available in the market 4.18 3.62
8 I have used this brand personally before 4.36 3.70
9 I have seen advertisements of this brand 4.56 4.04
WEIGHTED MEAN-BRAND ASSOCIATION
S.NO
STATEMENTS MAGGI TOP
RAMEN
PERCEIVED VALUE 3.45 3.27
1 Compared to alternative brands, this brand charges low price for its products
3.28 3.48
2 Among brands of instant noodles I consider this brand a good buy
3.84 3.22
3 Considering what I pay for this brand, I get much more than my money’s worth
3.22 3.10
BRAND PERSONALITY 3.94 3.45
4 This brand has a personality 4.08 3.56
5 This brand is interesting 3.94 3.60
6 I have a clear image of the type of person who would use this brand
3.80 3.20
ORGANISATIONAL ASSOCIATION 3.72 3.42
7 I trust the company which makes this brand 3.48 3.42
8 I like the company which makes this brand 3.92 3.48
9 The company which makes this brand has credibility 3.78 3.36
WEIGHTED MEAN-PERCEIVED QUALITYS.NO STATEMENTS MAGGI TOP
RAMEN
PERCEIVED QUALITY 3.05 3.36
1 The products offered by this brand are of high quality 3.18 3.42
2 No other brand can beat this brand in terms of quality 2.80 3.30
3 This brand maintains consistency in terms of its quality 3.16 3.38
LEADERSHIP 3.69 3.09
4 In comparison with alternative brands this brand is a leading brand
3.92 3.20
5 The products of this brand are growing in popularity 3.66 3.14
6 Compared to alternative brands this brand is innovative 3.50 2.94
PACKAGING OF PRODUCT 3.41 3.43
7 This brand’s product are neatly packed 3.94 4.04
8 The packaging of the products of this brand are different from that of its competitors
3.24 2.96
9 Products of this brand contains all the necessary true details of its contents on their package
3.06 3.30
WEIGHTED MEAN-BRAND LOYALTYS.NO STATEMENTS MAGGI TOP
RAMEN
EXPERIENCE 3.64 3.47
1 I have thoroughly enjoyed using this brand 3.96 3.46
2 This brand does not pretend to be something it is not 3.20 3.50
3 My past experiences with this brand makes me to expect it, to keep its promises
3.76 3.44
SATISFACTION 3.20 3.50
4 This brand delivers what it promises 2.86 3.64
5 This is one of the best brands I have ever bought 3.44 3.36
6 This brand has always satisfied me with regard to price, quantity, quality and also taste
3.30 3.50
BEHAVIOURAL AND ATTITUDINAL LOYALTY 3.49 3.28
7 This brand is always special to me and I would recommend this brand to others
3.58 3.50
8 Whenever possible I buy this brand on a regular basis 3.48 3.40
9 Even if many alternative brands arise I would surely stick on to this brand
3.40 2.94
WEIGHTED MEAN-BRAND EQUITY DIMENSIONS
S.NO BRAND EQUITY DIMENSIONS MAGGI TOP RAMEN
1 BRAND AWARENESS 4.10 3.93
2 BRAND ASSOCIATION 3.70 3.38
3 PERCEIVED QUALITY 3.38 3.29
4 BRAND LOYALTY 3.44 3.42
INTERCORRELATION-RELATIONSHIP
AMONG BRAND EQUITY
DIMENSIONS- MAGGI
Interpretation: In case of brand “Maggi” there is a perfect correlation between Perceived quality and brand association and the correlation value is significant at 99% confidence level. In case of interrelationship among other dimensions of brand equity the correlation values are not significant.
Correlations
brandawareness brandassociation perceivedquality brandloyalty
brandawareness
Pearson Correlation 1 .577 .588 -.366
Sig. (2-tailed) .608 .600 .762
N 3 3 3 3
brandassociation
Pearson Correlation .577 1 1.000** -.971
Sig. (2-tailed) .608 .008 .153
N 3 3 3 3
perceivedquality
Pearson Correlation .588 1.000** 1 -.968
Sig. (2-tailed) .600 .008 .162
N 3 3 3 3
brandloyalty
Pearson Correlation -.366 -.971 -.968 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .762 .153 .162
N 3 3 3 3
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
INTERCORRELATION-RELATIONSHIP
AMONG BRAND EQUITY
DIMENSIONS-TOP RAMEN
Interpretation: : In case of brand “Top Ramen”among all the four dimensions of brand equity the correlation values are not significant at 95% confidence level.
Correlations
brandawarness brandassociation perceivedquality brandloyalty
brandawarness
Pearson Correlation 1 .133 .816 -.994
Sig. (2-tailed) .915 .392 .069
N 3 3 3 3
brandassociation
Pearson Correlation .133 1 -.465 -.239
Sig. (2-tailed) .915 .692 .846
N 3 3 3 3
perceivedquality
Pearson Correlation .816 -.465 1 -.749
Sig. (2-tailed) .392 .692 .462
N 3 3 3 3
brandloyalty
Pearson Correlation -.994 -.239 -.749 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .069 .846 .462
N 3 3 3 3
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
• Prior to the ban, Maggi ruled India’s instant noodles market not just with its ubiquity in the remotest corners of India but also with its popularity as a quick-fix meal.
• Even after lot of controversies Maggi is still preferred by customers among other brands of noodles.
• Customers have felt satisfied with Maggi noodles due to its Familiarity, Perceived value, Organisational association, Personality and Leadership in the market.