Upload
cophha
View
254
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Strategic purchasing:An emerging agenda in Africa for
Universal Health Coverage
30 September 2016
RabatInke Mathauer, MSc., PhDHealth Financing Policy Team WHO, Geneva
What is purchasing?It is the process of paying for services:
relates to the relationship between purchaser and provider
refers to the allocation of resources from the purchaser to health service providers and concerns:
– Benefit package design: Which services and drugs to finance, and at what level?
– Resource allocation and provider payment methods: how are providers paid and at what rates?
– Selection of providers: from which types of providers?
occurs in all countries and in all types of health financing systems
Medicines: underuse of generics, higher than necessary prices
Services: medical errors, sub-optimal quality of care
Medicines: inappropriate or ineffective use
Services: inappropriate hospital size (low use of infrastructure)
Medicines: use of sub-standard and counterfeit medicines
Services: inappropriate hospital admissions and length of stay
Services and products: oversupply and overuse of equipment, investigations, procedures
Health workers: inappropriate or costly staff mix, unmotivated workers
Interventions: inefficient mix or inappropriate level of strategies
Leakages: waste, corruption, fraud
Ten leading sources of inefficiency
Source: World Health Report (2010), Chapter 4
An estimated 20-40% of health resources are wasted
Medicines: underuse of generics, higher than necessary prices
Services: medical errors, sub-optimal quality of care
Medicines: inappropriate or ineffective use
Services: inappropriate hospital size (low use of infrastructure)
Medicines: use of sub-standard and counterfeit medicines
Services: inappropriate hospital admissions and length of stay
Services and products: oversupply and overuse of equipment, investigations, procedures
Health workers: inappropriate or costly staff mix, unmotivated workers
Interventions: inefficient mix or inappropriate level of strategies
Leakages: waste, corruption, fraud
Ten leading sources of inefficiency
An estimated 20-40% of health resources are wasted
Some of these inefficiencies can be addressed through
better purchasing, others are to be addressed by
improved procurement.
Addressing efficiency requires several entry points
• Buying goods/supplies and medicines
• Determining the type of goods to buy
• Price and volume negotations
• Paying service providerso Provider payment
methods and rates• Contracting with public
and private providers
Purchasing ProcurementPurchaser(s) Purchaser(s), hospitals
central procurement agency
Human resource management
Infrastructure planning
At stewardship level:
What is strategic purchasing?
• «Linking payments to information on performance and health needs of the population»
• «Active, evidence-based engagement in defining the service-mix and volume, selecting the provider-mix, and deciding how to purchase»
through
– Payment methods and payment rates that create incentives for providers to manage their expenditures and/or focus on quantity or quality performance metrics
– (Selective) contracting, accreditation, performance monitoring
Moving from passive to strategic purchasing
“Passive”– resource allocation
using norms– little/no selection of
providers– little/no quality
monitoring– price and quality taker
Passive Strategic
• “Strategic”– payment systems
that create deliberate incentives for efficiency and quality
– selective contracting– quality improvement
and rewards– price and quality
makerSlide from WHO Advanced HF training, Tunis 2014
Align funding and incentives with promised health services
Promote quality in
service delivery
Promote accountability of
providers and purchasers to the
population
Enhance equitable
distribution of resources
Manage expenditure
growth & promote efficiency
Objectives for strategic purchasing
No progress towards UHC without efficient spending
“more health for the money” (WHO 2010, Ch. 4)
Align funding and incentives with promised health services
Promote quality in
service delivery
Promote accountability of
providers and purchasers to the
population
Enhance equitable
distribution of resources
Manage expenditure
growth & promote efficiency
Objectives for strategic purchasing
Countries “cannot simply spend their way to UHC” (Kutzin et al. 2016)
Closed-ended/budget-neutral
provider payment
Incentives to limit high-cost services
Emphasis on Primary
Care
Procurement: e.g., negotiation of drug prices
What does effective strategic purchasing look like in practice?
Source: Japan-WB Partnership Program on UHC 2014
But we often spend without knowing what we buy
Would you support a system that purchases– A very vaguely defined benefit package or a wide package that is
effectively not deliverable?
Would you support a system that purchases– Ineffective services, ineffective drugs– High volume of expensive diagnostic and curative services at the
expense of cost-effective public health measures and low cost curative services?
Would you support a system that pays for– Services without information on need and effectiveness
Many systems do the above to some extent!Slide from WHO Advanced HF training, Tunis 2014
Current challenges to moving towards strategic purchasing (1)
Weak stewardship for reform in general, and weak or absent governance of purchasing functions in particular
Unclear mandates of purchasing agencies and inadequate levels of autonomy of providers and purchasers;
Piloting mode of reform efforts with insufficient orientation towards institutionalization
– E.g., stand-alone performance-based financing mechanisms
Current challenges to moving towards strategic purchasing (2)
Existing public financial management regulations as a hurdle to implementing more output-oriented payment mechanisms;
Inadequate generation and use of data related to provider payment for wider system monitoring and for informing decision-makers;
Inadequate global information sharing on strategic purchasing experience and best practices, what works and does not work.
2. Mixed provider payment systems
4. Information management systems for effective purchasing
Some key topics and issues we think need more attention
3. Benefit package design and alignment with PPM
1. Governance around the purchasing function
1. Governance around the purchasing functions Need for clear mandates of purchasing agencies and adequate
levels of autonomy of providers and purchasersCoherent decision making structure (and division of labour
in decision-making) on purchasing aspectsOversight and accountability of purchasers, citizen
participation(Institutional) leadership to shift to more strategic
purchasingEnsuring effective purchasing market (e.g., single or
multiple) and institutional setup for purchasing (e.g. purchaser-provider split)
2. Mixed provider payment systems
Seeing the ‘mixed’ in mixed provider payment systems– Shifting from a messy mix to a coherent mix
Finding a context-appropriate mix of provider payment methods with aligned incentives
Let’s not forget: Improving budget execution
Integrating Performance Based Financing mechanisms into the system
3. Benefit package design and alignment with PPM
Realising the principle of “whatever is promised, can be delivered”
– based on a transparent process that determined which specific health services are included and which ones are excluded
– People are aware of what is covered
Finding the right specificity level in BP design– Institutionalization of BP revision and role of HTA
Focus on pricing and less on costing of BP (need to be clear on the purpose of costing)
Need to align BP and provider payment methods
4. Information management systems
Need for data and information to – improve purchasing and provider payment– improve planning to meet population needs– monitor and evaluate
Clarity in what data is needed and how to make use of it
Need to set up national, integrated (non-fragmented) health information management systems
Thank you very much!
Questions? Comments!
Purchasers and patients
Providers and industry
Policy makers
“I’ve got a strange feeling we’ve been
going round in circles”
Source of slide: A. Maynard