86
METHODS OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSION Presented by– Dr. Shahanur Rahman

Methods of immunosuppression

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Methods of immunosuppression

METHODS OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSION

Presented by– Dr. Shahanur Rahman

Page 2: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunosuppression

Involves an act that reduces the activation or efficacy of the immune system.

Page 3: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunosuppression is induced by-medications surgery (spleen removal), plasmapharesis, or radiation

Page 4: Methods of immunosuppression

HistoryInitial attempts at immunosuppression tried with

Total body radiation all the patients expired.

First immunosuppressant identified Cortisone side-effects limited its use.

Research work by Sir Peter B. Medowar (1940) led to a better understanding of Immuno system considered to the birth of Transplant immunobiology.

Page 5: Methods of immunosuppression

First to report a series of human-to-human kidney transplants in the 1940s Yu Yu Voronoy (Russian surgeon) outcomes were dismal.

Long-term success Joseph E. Murray in Boston, (1954) identical twins no immunosuppression required.

Page 6: Methods of immunosuppression
Page 7: Methods of immunosuppression

Pharmacological immunosuppression era 6-mercaptopurine azathioprine (1960s)

Primary immunosuppressive regimen azathioprine and steroids (1962 and 1964)

Polyclonal antilymphocyte globulin 1967.

Page 8: Methods of immunosuppression

Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine Dr. Joseph Murray, 1990 (immunosuppression).

Mycophenolate mofetil (1994) replaced azathioprine (almost universally)

Tacrolimus (1994) replaced cyclosporine

Page 9: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunosuppression is performed to

Prevent rejection of organ transplant,

Treat graft-versus-host disease after a bone marrow transplant,

Treat auto-immune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, Behcet's Disease, pemphigus.

Page 10: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunobiology• Immune system has two complementary

divisions:

Innate immune system: acts during ischemia, necrosis or trauma.

Acquired immune system: specifically recognizes foreign substances (peptide or carbohydrate moieties) and do disposition. It has immunologic memory also. Cellular T cell T cell receptor (TCR) Humoral B cell B cell receptor (antibody)

Page 11: Methods of immunosuppression

B cell receptor (antibody): can identify its epitope directly without preparation of the antigen.

T cells: only recognize specific epitope after it has been processed and bound to histocompatibility proteins. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) – cluster of

highly conserved polymorphic genes located on short arm of chromosome 6.

In human its called HLA (human leukocyte antigen) – these MHC molecules binds to peptide antigens processed it and present to TCR called antigen presentation responsible for human transplant rejection.

Page 12: Methods of immunosuppression

Types of MHC molecules - HLA class I HLA class II HLA class III

HLA antigens: Are the most common cause of graft rejection. Their physiological function is to act as antigen

recognition units. Are highly polymorphic (amino acid sequence differs

widely between individuals). HLA-A, -B (class I) and -DR (class II) are most important

in organ transplantation.

Page 13: Methods of immunosuppression
Page 14: Methods of immunosuppression

HLA class I molecules –Comprises of HLA-A, -B and –C.Present on all nucleated cell and platelet.Specific for CD8+ T cells.T cell activation occurs when-

CD8+ T cells binds to free antigen bound with class I MHC.

Cross-presentation: when APCs (dendritic cells) take up and process exogenous antigen and present it on class I molecules to CD8+ T cells.

Direct allo-response: in case of transplantation T cells directly interact with the graft tissue class I MHC antigens.

Page 15: Methods of immunosuppression

HLA class II molecules –Comprises of HLA-DR, -DP and –DQ.Present on antigen presenting cells (macrophage, dendritic

cell, B cells, activated T cells) and can appear on parenchymal cells in case of cytokine release cause by transplantation.

Specific for CD4+ T cells.T cell activation occurs when-

CD4+ T cells binds to free antigen bound with class I MHC.Indirect allo-response : when APCs (dendritic cells) take

up and process exogenous antigen and present it on class II molecules to CD4+ T cells.

Direct allo-response: in case of transplantation T cells directly interact with the graft tissue class II MHC antigen because trauma of surgery or ischemia can up-regulate class I molecules on all cells of an allograft .

Page 16: Methods of immunosuppression

HLA class III molecules –Examples – TNF-alfa, TNF-beta, HSP-70, and component of complement cascade.

Blood group antigens of ABO system –ABO antigens must be consider in transplantation, takes

part in hyperacute and acute rejection.Rh antigens however not considered.

Minor histocpmpatibility complex – Exists in the genome outside of HLA locus.Play a minor role in transplant rejection.Point to be noted is that even HLA identical individuals are

subjected to rejection on the basis of this minor antigens.

Page 17: Methods of immunosuppression

Co-stimulationRecognition of the antigen-MHC complex via TCR

(signal 1) binding is not sufficient to generate a response in naïve T cell.

Co-stimulatory pathway (signal 2) required optimal T cell activation.

In absence of co-stimulation (signal 2) T cells fails achieve activation leads to a state of inactivation/anergy.

There are two co-stimulatory pathway- CD28-B7 pathway CD154-CD40 pathway

Page 18: Methods of immunosuppression
Page 19: Methods of immunosuppression

CD28-B7 pathway:CD28 presents on T cells and B7(CD80 & CD86) on APCs.CTLA-4 is a ligand for CD80 & CD86 (upregulated and

expressed on activated T cells) binds B7 receptors (10 to 20 times greater affinity than CD28) negative regulatory effect on T cell activation and proliferation.

CTLA-4 Ig (abatacept): binds to B7 molecules prevents costimulation via CD28.

CD154-CD40 pathway:CD154 primarily found on activated T cell and CD40 found

on cell surface of endothelium, Dendritic cells and B cells.TCR signaling up-regulation of CD154 on T cells CD154

binds to CD40 of APCs signal for B cell activation and proliferation and co-stimulate cytotoxic T cells.

Page 20: Methods of immunosuppression

T cell costimulaion

Page 21: Methods of immunosuppression

HLA typing:HLA matching has a relatively small but definitive role on

renal allograft survival (HLA-DR>HLA-B>HLA-A)Well matched renal allograft recipient may require less

intensive immunosuppression and encounter less rejection episodes.

HLA identical allograft – matched at all HLA loci (though not an isograft, still differ genetically at other genetic loci)

HLA haploidentical allograft – matched at half of HLA loci.

Degree of HLA mismatch:‘000 mismatch’ - complete match‘012 mismatch’ – matched at HLA-A loci, one mismatched at

HLA-B loci and Both mismatch at HLA-DR loci.

Page 22: Methods of immunosuppression

Allograft rejection manifests itself as functional failure of the transplant and is confirmed by histological examination.

Biopsy material is obtained renal and pancreas grafts by needle biopsy, and hepatic grafts by percutaneous or transjugular liver biopsy. Cardiac grafts are biopsied by transjugular endomyocardial biopsy and lung grafts by transbronchial biopsy. small intestinal transplantation, mucosal biopsies are obtained from the

graft stoma or more proximally by endoscopy.

A standardised histological grading system, termed the Banff classification defines the presence and severity of allograft rejection after organ transplantation

Page 23: Methods of immunosuppression

Types of allograft rejectionType Time Pathological

findingsMechanism Treatment

Hyperacute Rejection

Minutes to hours

Thrombosis, necrosis

Preformed antibody and complement activation (type II hypersensitivity)

None,Only prevention

Acute Rejection

5-30 days Vasculitis

Cellular infiltration

Antibody, T and B lymphocytes

CD4 and CD8 T cells (type IV hypersensitivity)

Removal of antibody through plasmapheresis,

Increase immunosuppression

Chronic Rejection

> 30 days Fibrosis, scarring

Immune and non-immune mechanisms

Minimise drug toxicity, control hypertension and hyperlipidaemia

Page 24: Methods of immunosuppression

Hyperacute rejection

A very rapid type of rejection, occurs immediately, within minutes to hours.

Triggered by preformed antibodies against the donor’s HLA or ABO blood group antigens.

Ab Arises from previous blood transfusion, a failed transplant, pregnancy or ABO incompatible organ transplantation.

Resulting in irreversible graft destruction immediately after organ reperfusion.

Page 25: Methods of immunosuppression

• Characterised by Intravenous thrombosis, interstitial haemorrhage and necrosis.

Example: Kidney transplants are particularly vulnerable to hyper-acute graft rejection. Liver is resistant to hyperacute rejection (dual blood supply)

No treatment available.

• Prevented by: ensuring ABO blood group compatibility and by performing a cross-match test on recipient serum(in which the donor’s cells are mixed with the recipient’s serum and then destruction of the cells is observed).

Page 26: Methods of immunosuppression

Acute Rejection Occurs usually within a few days or weeks

post-transplant (5-30 days)

The most common type of rejection.

Mediated by: predominantly T lymphocytes but allo-antibodies play an important role.

Characterized by: mononuclear cell infiltration of the graft.

Page 27: Methods of immunosuppression

The diagnosis: of acute rejection is based on the results of

biopsies of the transplanted organ,

special immunologic stains and

laboratory tests.

Treatment: Most episodes of acute rejection can be reversed by additional immunosuppressive therapy.

Page 28: Methods of immunosuppression

Acute renal allograft rejection with a heavy mononuclear cell infiltrate and intimal arteritis.

Page 29: Methods of immunosuppression

Acute renal allograft rejection, widespread staining for the complement component C4d within the peritubular capillaries

that indicates alloantibody binding to the graft vasculature.

Page 30: Methods of immunosuppression

Some Laboratory tests are: elevated creatinine levels in kidney

transplant recipients,

elevated liver function values in liver transplant recipients,

and elevated levels of glucose, amylase and lipase in pancrease transplant recipients).

Page 31: Methods of immunosuppression

Chronic rejection

is a slow type of rejection, occurs after 30 days posttransplant to the first six months, progresses gradually over several years.

is a major cause of allograft failure.

The mechanism: Immune and non-immune mechanisms.

Page 32: Methods of immunosuppression

Organ-specific features of chronic graft rejection

Kidney: glomerular sclerosis and tubular atrophy;

Pancreas: acinar loss and islet destruction;

Heart: accelerated coronary artery disease (cardiac allograft vasculopathy);

Liver: vanishing bile duct syndrome;

Lungs: obliterative bronchiolitis.

Page 33: Methods of immunosuppression

The histological picture of chronic rejection after organ transplantation:myointimal proliferation in graft arteries (vascular

changes) ischaemia and fibrosis.

Pathologic changes eventually lead to fibrosis and loss of graft function.

Page 34: Methods of immunosuppression

Chronic renal allograft rejection, The arteriole shows severemyointimal proliferation and luminal narrowing, resulting in

ischaemic fibrosis.

Page 35: Methods of immunosuppression

Graft versus host disease (GVHD)• Mechanism: Bone marrow and some donor organs

(particularly liver and small bowel) contain large numbers of lymphocytes these donor T cells recognize the allogeneic HLA antigens (MHC molecules) or the minor histocompatibility antigens of the host initiate an inflammatory immune response against host tissue leading to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

frequently involves the skin, causing a characteristic rash on the palms and soles.

It may also involve the liver (after small bowel transplantation) and the gastrointestinal tract (after liver transplantation).

Page 36: Methods of immunosuppression

?How to overcome the risk of GVHD

Taking graft from:Genotypic identical sibling.

Other family members.

Matched unrelated donor.(Though the probability that any two unrelated persons will match, is extremely low)

Page 37: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive drugs Small-molecule drugs Immunophilin-binding drugs

Calcineurin inhibitors Cyclophilin-binding drugs: cyclosporine FKB12-binding drugs: tacrolimus,

modified release tacrolimus Target-of-rapamycin inhibitors: sirolimus,

everolimus Inhibitors of nucleotide synthesis

Purine synthesis (IMDH) inhibitors Mycophenolate mofetil,

Enteric-coated mycophenolic acid (EC-MFS) Mizoribine (MZR) Pyrimidine synthesis (DHODH)

inhibitors LeflunomideFK778 Antimetabolites: azathioprine (Aza) Sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor

antagonists: FTY720 Glucocorticoids

Protein drugs Depleting antibodies (against T cells, B cells, or

both) Polyclonal antibody: horse or rabbit

antithymocyte globulin Humanized monoclonal anti CD-52 antibody

(alemtuzumab) B-cell-depleting monoclonal anti-CD-20

antibody (rituximab) Mouse monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody

(muromonab-CD3) Nondepleting antibodies and fusion proteins

Humanized or chimeric monoclonal anti-CD25 antibody (daclizumab, basiliximab)

Fusion protein with natural binding properties: CTLA4-Ig (Belatacept)

Intravenous gammaglobulin C5 inhibitor Eculizumab Protease inhibitor Bortezomib

Page 38: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive agents. Principal mode of action

Corticosteroids Widespread anti-inflammatory effects

Azathioprine Prevents lymphocyte proliferation

Mycophenolic acidPreperations

Prevents lymphocyte proliferation

Calcineurin inhibitors Blocks IL-2 gene transcription

mTOR inhibitors Blocks IL-2 receptor signal transduction

ALG Depletion and blockade of lymphocytes

Anti-CD52 mAb Depletion of lymphocytes

Anti-CD25 mAb

Targets activated T cells

CTLA-4Ig Blocks T-cell costimulation

Anti-CD20 Depletion of B lymphocytes

Page 39: Methods of immunosuppression

Site of action of immunosuppressive agents on T cell.

Page 40: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunosuppression is delivered in two phases

A. Induction (started immediately post-transplant, when the risk of rejection is highest) and done with anti-T-lymphocyte–depleting or non-depleting antibodies.

B. Maintenance (usually started within days post-transplant and continued for the life of the recipient or graft) and conventionally done with calcineurin inhibitors, anti-proliferative agents, and corticosteroids.

Thus, the level of immunosuppression is highest in the first 3 to 6 months post-transplant; during this time, prophylaxis against various bacterial, viral, or even antifungal opportunistic infections is also given.

Page 41: Methods of immunosuppression

• Dual Therapy: Calcineurin inhibitors + Antiproliferative agents / Corticosteroids.

• Triple Therapy: Calcineurin inhibitors + Antiproliferative agents + Corticosteroids.

• Quadriple Therapy: Polyclonal antibodies + Calcineurin inhibitors + Antiproliferative agents + Corticosteroids. (Risk of Acute Rejection)

Page 42: Methods of immunosuppression

InductionIncludes the use of depleting (polyclonal) antibodies

or non-depleting antibodies within the first month post-transplant.

Advantages: induction with antibody regimens may prevent acute rejection, potentially leading to improved graft survival and the use of less maintenance immunosuppression.

Page 43: Methods of immunosuppression
Page 44: Methods of immunosuppression

Atgam (which has largely been replaced by Thymoglobulin) is a purified gamma globulin obtained by immunizing horses with human thymocytes.

Page 45: Methods of immunosuppression

Thymoglobulin(Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) is a purified gamma

globulin obtained by immunizing rabbits with human hymocytes.

Contains antibodies to T cells and B cells, integrins and other adhesion molecules, thereby resulting in rapid depletion of peripheral lymphocytes.

Doses: total dose 6 mg/kg (more doses and prolonged duration increase the risk of infection and the potential occurrence of lymphoma.)

Page 46: Methods of immunosuppression

Thymoglobulin

Pre-medications: causes a cytokine release syndrome, so pre-medications (acetaminophen and diphenhydramine) are usually given.

Adverse effects: fever, chills, arthralgias, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and increased incidence of a variety of infections.

Page 47: Methods of immunosuppression

Alemtuzumab (Campath)

anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody.

Mode of Action: causes cell death by complement-mediated cytolysis, antibody-mediated cytotoxicity and apoptosis profound lymphocyte-depleting effects.

Doses: One dose alone (30 mg) depletes 99% of lymphocytes.

Recovery: Monocyte recovery can be seen at 3 months post-transplant;B-cell recovery at12 months; and T-cell recovery, albeit only to 50% of baseline at 36 months.

Page 48: Methods of immunosuppression

Alemtuzumab (Campath)Premedications: causes a significant cytokine

release reaction and often requires premedications (steroids and antihistamines).

Complications: Because of the long-lasting T-cell depletion, there is always risks of infection and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

Currently, alemtuzumab is available only through a limited distribution program, not through commercial medication distributors.

Page 49: Methods of immunosuppression

Rituximab A chimeric anti-CD20 (anti-B cell) monoclonal

antibody. Currently FDA approved for treating lymphoma.

The CD20 antigen is expressed early in the B-cell cycle but is absent on mature plasma cells.

The variable region binds to CD20, cause B cell depletion through three different mechanisms: (a) antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity, (b) complement-dependent cell killing, and (c) induction of apoptotic cell death.

Page 50: Methods of immunosuppression

Rituximab

Use: treatment of antibody-mediated rejection and use in desensitization protocols.

Usually used in conjunction with plasmapheresis, steroids, and intravenous immunoglobulin(IVIG).

Page 51: Methods of immunosuppression

Muromonab-CD3MOA: This agent displaces the T3 molecule from

antigen receptors, captures all mature T cells, and prevents alloantigen recognition.

The reversal rate of first acute rejection episodes is 94%.

Muromonab-CD3 is sometimes used as the first-line agent for severe vascular rejections.

A second course of muromonab-CD3 may be given for recurrent rejection.

The success rate in recurrent episodes is approximately 40-50%.

Page 52: Methods of immunosuppression

IL-2 Receptor Antibodies (Basiliximab/Daclizumab)

Basiliximab (Simulect) is an anti-CD25/ IL-2 receptor monoclonal antibody.

MOA: The alpha subunit of the IL-2 receptor, also known as CD25 or Tac, is found exclusively on activated T cells. Blockade of CD25 prevents IL-2 induced T-cell activation.

Uses: Usually, it is followed by the use of calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids and MMF as maintenance immunosuppression.

Page 53: Methods of immunosuppression

Basiliximab (Simulect)

Advantages: Its selectivity in blocking IL-2 mediated responses makes it a powerful induction agent without the added risks of infections, malignancies or other major side effects.

Disadvantages: No lymphocyte depletion occurs with Basiliximab; it is not designed to be used to treat acute rejection.

Currently, basiliximab is the only available anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody approved for clinical use.

Page 54: Methods of immunosuppression

Belatacept (CTLA4-Ig)

MOA: Antibody against the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA4) binds to CD80 and CD86 blocks T-cell costimulation pathway.

Disadvantages: Belatacept was not inferior to cyclosporine in both patient and allograft survival rates, but was associated with a higher rate of biopsy proven acute cellular rejection.

Page 55: Methods of immunosuppression

Belatacept (CTLA4-Ig)

Adverse effects: an increased risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD); the greatest risk is in recipients who are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seronegative pretransplant.

Uses: New drug for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplants only.

The FDA recommends the use of belatacept only in seropositive recipients. Studies in liver transplant recipients were halted early because of increased mortality rates.

Page 56: Methods of immunosuppression

Maintenance Cyclosporine

Tacrolimus

Mycophenolate mofetil

Azathioprine

Corticosteroids

Sirolimus

Belatacept

Page 57: Methods of immunosuppression
Page 58: Methods of immunosuppression

Cyclosporine (A calcineurin inhibitor)

Mode of Action: binds with its cytoplasmic receptor protein, cyclophilin inhibits the activity of calcineurin decreasing the expression of several critical T-cell activation genes, the most important being for IL-2 T-cell activation is suppressed.

Gengraf and Neoral, are micro-emulsified with improved bioavailability.

Doses: intravenously or orally to maintain trough levels of 250 to 350 ng/mL for the first 3 months post-transplant it can be tapered to 150 to 250 ng/mL.

Page 59: Methods of immunosuppression

Cyclosporine (A calcineurin inhibitor)

Uses: Used in maintenance protocols.

Adverse effects: nephrotoxic - constrict the afferent arteriole in a dose-

dependent, reversible manner. hyperkalemia and hypomagnesemia. Neurotoxicity - headaches, tremor, and seizures also

have been reported. undesirable cosmetic effects, including hirsutism and

gingival hyperplasia noted. It is associated with a higher incidence of hypertension

and hyper-lipidemia than tacrolimus.

Page 60: Methods of immunosuppression

Gingival hyperplasia due to Cyclosporine

Page 61: Methods of immunosuppression

Its more effective in acute rejection (primary immunosuppression and rescue therapy).

This calcineurin inhibitor is now the backbone of most immunosuppressive regimens.

Used as mainstay of maintenance protocols.

Mode of Action: binds to FKBPs inhibition of IL-2 production (10 to 100 times more potent than cyclosporine).

Route: intravenously, orally, or sublingually Doses: to maintain trough levels of 8 to 12 ng/mL for the first

3 months post-transplant; then it can be tapered to 6 to 10 ng/mL.

Tacrolimus (Prograf)

Page 62: Methods of immunosuppression

Tacrolimus (Prograf)Adverse effects: causes a higher incidence of

post-transplant new-onset diabetes than does cyclosporine.

Other side effects: alopecia, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hypertension, hyperkalemia, hypomagnesemia, and an increased incidence of certain types of infection

Page 63: Methods of immunosuppression

mTOR Inhibitors(Sirolimus/Everolimus)

SirolimusThe first mTOR (mammalian target of Rapamycin) inhibitors to enter clinical use was sirolimus (Rapamune).

MOA: bind to FK506-binding protein (FKBP) sirolimus-FKBP complex binds to mTOR (In response to proliferation signals provided by cytokines like IL-2, this key regulatory kinase, mTOR changes cells from the G1 to S phase in the cell cycle)Sirolimus inhibits G1 to S phase cell cycle change.

also inhibits proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (thus inhibit the vasculopathy and progressive fibrosis that can affect allografts).

Uses: to help withdraw or completely avoid the use of steroids. Used as an alternative to tacrolimus or cyclosporine, in a calcineurin-sparing protocol.

Page 64: Methods of immunosuppression

Adverse effects of SirolimusHypertriglyceridemia (a condition that may be

resistant to statins and fibrates.)Hypercholesterolemia, Hyperlipidemia, Impaired wound healing (immediately in post-

transplant period), Wound dehiscence, Interstitial lung diseaseAnemia, Leukopenia, ThrombocytopeniaHepatic Artery ThrombosisPeripheral edema(these problems are exacerbated when it is used

in combination with MMF).

Page 65: Methods of immunosuppression

Drugs or substances that may increase the level of Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus or Sirolimus.

Antibiotics Antifungals

Calcium Channel Blockers

Others

Azithromycin Fluconazole Diltiazem Protease inhibitors for HBV

Clarithromycin Ketoconazole

Verapamil Protease inhibitors for HIV

Erythromycin Itraconazole Danazol

Voriconazole Grapefruit productsTerbinafineCaspofungin

Page 66: Methods of immunosuppression
Page 67: Methods of immunosuppression

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Approved for preventing acute rejection after kidney

transplants. MMF has now been incorporated into routine maintenance

regimens for many solid organ transplants. Effective for primary immunosuppression in combination with

tacrolimus. Mode of Action: inhibitor of inosine monophosphate

dehydrogenase (IMPDH), involved in the de novo pathway of purine synthesis Leads to blockage of DNA replication in T and B lymphocytes.

Doses: 1000-1500mg bid MMF (250 and 500 mg capsules) or360-720 BID MPA(delayed release form of MMF )

Page 68: Methods of immunosuppression

Adverse effects of MMFThe most common is GI in nature-

diarrhea, nausea, dyspepsia, and bloating. Esophagitis and gastritis

(occur in roughly 5% of recipients and may represent a cytomegalovirus (CMV) or herpes virus family infection).

The others are- leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia .

(Leukopenia can sometimes be reversed by lowering the MMF dose and discontinuing other agents like valganciclovir).

Page 69: Methods of immunosuppression

Azathioprine (AZA)

Mode of Action: AZA is converted to 6-mercaptopurine inhibits both the de novo purine synthesis and salvage purine synthesis.

AZA decreases T-lymphocyte activity and decreases antibody production.

Uses: It is preferred in recipients who are considering conceiving a child, (because MMF is teratogenic in females and can cause birth defects). AZA might be an option for recipients who cannot tolerate the gastrointestinal (GI) side effects of MMF.

Page 70: Methods of immunosuppression

Azathioprine Adverse effects:

Bone marrow suppression (most significant) Leukopenia (often reversible with dose reduction or

temporary cessation of the drug). Hepatotoxicity, Pancreatitis, Anemia, Pulmonary fibrosis, and Neoplasia

Its most significant drug interaction is with allopurinol, which blocks AZA’s metabolism, increasing the risk of pancytopenia. Recommendations are to not use AZA and allopurinol together, or if doing so is unavoidable, to decrease the dose of AZA by 75%.

Page 71: Methods of immunosuppression

Corticosteroids

An integral component of most immunosuppressive protocols, for both induction and maintenance.

First-line agents in the treatment of acute rejection.

Mode of Action: binds to gluco-corticoid-responsive elements in DNA prevent the transcription of cytokine genes and cytokine receptors. In addition, have an impact on

Causes lymphocyte depletion, Decrease in cell-mediated immunity and Reduce T-cell activation of many phases of rejection.

Page 72: Methods of immunosuppression

CorticosteroidsDoses:

Perioperatively Large doses and immediate postoperative period 5 to 15 mg/day.

Used: in induction, maintenance and treatment of acute rejection.

Adverse effects: acne, mood changes, diabetes (hyperglycemia), hypertension, osteoporosis, cataracts, myopathy, increased appetite, weight gain and impaired wound healing.

Page 73: Methods of immunosuppression

Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus or Sirolimus are the backbone of maintenance immunosuppresion.Addition of other agents (Steroids, MMF, Azathioprine) can be used to decrease risk of rejection or allow for lower doses of the primary agents.50% of post-OLT deaths are directly/indirectly related to immunosuppressive medications.Control of blood pressure, treatment of hyperlipidemia, and management of diabetes are the current mainstays of treatment for graft preservation.

Page 74: Methods of immunosuppression

Length of treatment Immunosuppressive medications appear to be necessary

for the life of the transplanted organ.Episodes of acute cellular rejection have occurred after the

cessation of medication even 20 years after transplantation.

For patients with stable graft function, individual components of the treatment regimen may be gradually diminished or completely discontinued; however, in most patients, some degree of immunosuppression must be continued.

Some patients with severe resistant infections or malignancy related to immunosuppressants require the discontinuation of these medicines.

Page 75: Methods of immunosuppression

Early infections:In the immediate postoperative period(i.e.,

infections occurring within 1 month posttransplant)

due to a wide spectrum of pathogens (bacterial, viral, and fungal).

Surgical infections: generalized peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscesses, and wound infections.

Medical infections: include respiratory, urinary tract, and bloodstream infections.

Page 76: Methods of immunosuppression

Late infections:

primarily are due to chronic immunosuppression, (the depression of cell-mediated immunity that renders recipients susceptible to viruses, fungi, and parasites).

Viral infections are: CMV, EBV, HSV, HPV (have a higher incidence if seronegative recipient receiving allografts from seropositive donors).

Page 77: Methods of immunosuppression

CMV infectionThe incidence of CMV has been greatly reduced

with 12-week Acyclovir prophylaxis.

Symptomatic infections and all tissue-invasive CMV disease: Rx intravenous (IV) gancyclovir, a reduction in immunosuppression, or both.

Page 78: Methods of immunosuppression

EBV infectionCan cause:

mild mononucleosis syndrome, to severe hepatitis and PTLD.

PTLD ranges from a localized tumor to a progressive, diffuse infiltration of various organs

including the brain.Mx:

patients with early lesions, the first line of treatment is to reduce immunosuppression.

For those with more advanced PTLD, rituximab is used.

Page 79: Methods of immunosuppression

HPV infection An increasingly recognized problem associated with immunosuppression is BK virus

nephropathy. This virus, a member of the human papovavirus family, lives in the human genitourinary tract and replicates in some patients who are immunosuppressed, leading to allograft dysfunction.

While antiviral agents such as cidofovir and leflunomide are active against the BK virus, the mainstay of therapy is a reduction in immunosuppression. Concurrent renal allograft rejection was treated with pulse steroid therapy and a reduction in immunosuppression.

The results of one study found that a combination of monthly screening for polyoma BK virus nephropathy (PVN) using PCR and a modest decrease in immunotherapy is a safe and effective in preventing PVN and may significantly decrease cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in renal transplant patients.

The results of another study found that monthly nucleic acid testing during the first 6 months post renal allograft and immediate reduction of immunosuppression is effective in preventing BK polyomavirus virus nephropathy (BKVN) in viremic patients.

Page 80: Methods of immunosuppression

Blastomyces dermatitidis treatment is IV amphotericin B.

Coccidioides immitis The first line of treatment is high-dose amphotericin B.

Histoplasma capsulatum CNS involvement Rx prolonged (3 to 13 months) administration of oral itraconazole.

invasive Candida or Aspergillus infections Prophylaxis with fluconazole (liver recipients).

Pneumocystis jiroveci Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the effective prophylaxis.

Invasive fungal infections (6 months posttransplant)

Page 81: Methods of immunosuppression

Malignancies in ImmunosuppressionChronic immunosuppression increases the risk

of developing certain types of malignancies.

Recipients had at least a fivefold increase risk of malignancies (as compared with the general population).

Examples: Kaposi’s sarcoma, Non-melanoma skin cancer, Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, PTLD and Cancer of the liver, anus, vulva, and lip.

Page 82: Methods of immunosuppression

Malignancies In addition, recipients had a statistically significant

increase in Melanoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and Cancer of the lung, kidney, colon, rectum, and

pancreas. Immunosuppressive drugs causing malignacy:

CyclosporineAzathioprineAlemtuzumab (PTLD)Belatacept (PTLD)

Page 83: Methods of immunosuppression

The cause of death of approximately 27% of patients who die with a functioning graft is related to infectious or malignant complications.

This highlights the question of the appropriate amount of immunosuppression required to balance the aspects of graft function with complications related to therapy.

Page 84: Methods of immunosuppression

Pregnancy Current data suggest that protocols involving

cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids are associated with low rates of birth defects, although patients are treated with high-risk pregnancy strategies.

However, also note that children born to parents with previous transplants are often small for gestational age.

Preliminary data also suggest the safety of tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil animal data and some early

human studies show adverse effects on fetal development.

Presently, few data exist regarding sirolimus and pregnancy.

Page 85: Methods of immunosuppression

Immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation is complex. Over the past 50 years, the medical community has witnessed great advances in the care of patients receiving organ transplants. Improved therapeutic strategies have been associated with better patient and graft survival rates; however, the adverse effects associated with these agents and the risks of long-term immunosuppression present a number of challenges for the clinician. With all the successes of immunosuppressive therapies come the obligations to tailor treatments to meet the individual patient's characteristics and to balance the risks and benefits of these medications.

Summary

Page 86: Methods of immunosuppression

Thank You