78
TYPES OF EVALUATION TOOL/TECHNIQUES Presented by Nirsuba Gurung

Types of evaluation tool

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Types of evaluation tool

TYPES OF EVALUATION

TOOL/TECHNIQUES

Presented byNirsuba Gurung

Page 2: Types of evaluation tool

TOOLS OF MEASUREMENT

1. Classroom Test Measures 2. Clinical Test Measure

Page 3: Types of evaluation tool

Tools for Class room evaluation

Paper Pencil Tests

Subjective type Objectivetype

Extensive Response or 1. Supply Type Essay Type a.Short answer

type Short Response

b.Completion type

2. Selection types a. True

false type b. Matching

types c. MCQ

Page 4: Types of evaluation tool

Clinical test measures

Observational techniques Practical Examination Viva Voce

Rating scale OSPE Check list OSCE Anecdotal report

Written communication reports• Patient care

studies • Problem

oriented records

• Patient care conference

Page 5: Types of evaluation tool

EVALUATION METHODOLY

Class room Evaluation Clinical Evaluation

Paper pencil test Oral OSPE/OSCE Observation Written Report

Subjective type Objective Type Rating Scale Check List Anecdotal Record Essay Short Answer Supply Type Selection type

Short Answer Completion Alternative response, Matching, Multiple choice

Page 6: Types of evaluation tool

TOOLS OF MEASUREMENT

1. Paper pencil test: It plays a central role in evaluation of student’s class room learning.

Page 7: Types of evaluation tool

SUBJECTIVE TYPE

A. Extended Response or Essay Type:

It gives students a complete freedom in their response.

Learner is free to select the factual information he/she thinks is pertinent and free to organize the response according to the best of his judgment.

Page 8: Types of evaluation tool

ADVANTAGES:

1. Possible to measure the complex learning outcomes which is not possible to measure by means of objective type of test.

2. Measures such higher cognitive learning as application of thinking and problem solving.

3. Serves as a mean of improving writing skills.

4. Consumes less time in test construction than a good objective type items.

5. It is more economical to use than the objective types of questions that consume much more stationary.

6. It induces study habits among students.

Page 9: Types of evaluation tool

LIMITATIONS:

1. Scoring is time consuming.2. Scoring is less reliable as it takes subjective

judgment , scoring may differ from teachers to teachers .

3. Volume of the writing rather than content might impress some teachers.

4. The quality of Examinees’ hand writing might influence the scoring of answers.

5. At time students like to write every thing they know than just what is asked for.

6. In essay test , representative of all subject matter is less bcz covering of wide sampling of the course is not possible.

7. Examinee’s speed of writing might influence his/her response.

Page 10: Types of evaluation tool

EXAMPLES OF EXTENDED RESPONSE OR ESSAY TYPE

1. Describe similarities and differences between teacher centered and student centered learning.

2. Describe main characteristics of learning.3. Describe three leadership styles with their

benefits and limitations.

Page 11: Types of evaluation tool

HOW TO IMPROVE ESSAY TYPE OF TESTS

1. Use essay questions to measure only those learning outcomes that can not be measured by objective items.

2. Formulate the essay questions in such a way that the task for examinees is clearly indicated.

3. Remove vagueness by structuring the questions. The unstructured questions can be turned into structured type by breaking the questions into subtypes. E.g. Unstructured: Discuss leadership styles.Structured : Describe three leadership styles with their benefits

and limitations.Unstructured : Describe curriculum and instructionStructured: define the terms curriculum and instruction, and

differentiate them.

Page 12: Types of evaluation tool

4. Give clear direction in term of time for completion, full marks, pass marks and the number of questions to be attempted.

5. Draft the Test items sometimes in advance.6. Keep the blue print in view as you write the

test items 7. Get the test exercise examined or critiqued by

one or more collogues for establishing validity.

Page 13: Types of evaluation tool

8. Prepare a model answer.9. Conceal from the examiner the identity of

students to avoid halo effect in scoring.10. Score all answers to one question before

proceeding with other question.11. Allow adequate time for scoring.

Page 14: Types of evaluation tool

SHORT RESPONSE TYPE

Limits the response . Short-answer questions require students to

supply or write an answer, rather than to select or to guess from a fixed number of options.

The major limitation of the short-answer test is that it is not suitable for testing complex learning outcomes.

Page 15: Types of evaluation tool

Procedure for setting and marking SAQ

1. Make the questions precise .2. Prepare a structured marking sheet :

Allocate marks or part of marks for the acceptable answer (s)

3. Be prepared to consider other equally acceptable answers, some of which you may not have predicted

4. Mark questions with the following points in mind:

• Mark anonymously • Preferably have a different examiner for each page

of questions to reduce bias.

Page 16: Types of evaluation tool

EXAMPLES

1. List the four advantages of using overhead projectors.

2. Draw a diagram of internal structure of heart and label it.

Page 17: Types of evaluation tool

OBJECTIVE TYPE

It is highly structured and requires students to supply a word or two or select a correct answer from the given alternatives.1. Supply type 2. Selection type

Page 18: Types of evaluation tool

SUPPLY TYPES ITEMS

A supply type test item can be answered by a word, phrase or symbol.

Classified into two subtypes:a. Short answer type: Example:

• what is the name of person who invented vaccine?------------

• Which is the largest digestive gland? ---------b. Completion types: The question is phrase an

incomplete sentence and examinee has to complete it by filling in the blank space given. Example: The name of the person who invented vaccine is -----

Page 19: Types of evaluation tool

USES OF SUPPLY TYPES ITEMS

Are suitable to measure the wide variety of relatively simple learning outcomes like:

Knowledge of terminology Specific facts principles and Simple interpretation of data.

Page 20: Types of evaluation tool

BENEFITS OF SUPPLY TYPE

Easy to construct A relatively large area of content can be

covered. The chance of guessing to supply is reduced. Takes less time in scoring the test.

Page 21: Types of evaluation tool

LIMITATIONS

It is suitable to measure only lower cognitive achievements. Especially rote memory but not measuring complex learning.

Unless the question is very carefully phrased , the ambiguity might set in and answer has to be accepted as partially correct. For example; Where is BUDDHA born?

Page 22: Types of evaluation tool

SUGGESTION FOR WRITING SUPPLY TYPES ITEMS

1. Phrase the item in such away that the required answer is both brief and definite.

2. Writing question in direct question form is more desirable than incomplete sentence.

3. Leave the blank space of equal length for all items to avoid clue to the answer.

4. Do not use too many blanks in one item, it may create confusion by breaking the thought process.

5. Prepare answer key for scoring.

Page 23: Types of evaluation tool

SELECTION TYPE ITEM

1. Alternative Response Item (T/F type)2. Matching type 3. MCQ

Page 24: Types of evaluation tool

SELECTION TYPE ITEM1. Alternative Response Item: It consists

of a declarative statement that the student is asked to mark as true or false.

Example: a) DM develops mostly after the age of 40

years (T/F)b) Penicillin is an effective drug for

treatment of pneumonia. (T/F)c) All bacteria cause diseases. (T/F)

Uses: To measure the ability to identify the statement of facts, definition of terms, statements of principles.

Page 25: Types of evaluation tool

BENEFITS/LIMITATIONSBenefits

• Takes less time in scoring• Students can respond to a larger number

of questions in limited time.

Limitations

The simple true false item usually measures the low cognitive achievements.

The validity and reliability of the results of the tests is low as only the limited number of questions can be included.

The students have 50% chance of getting the correct answer by guessing.

Page 26: Types of evaluation tool

SUGGESTION FOR WRITING ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE ITEM1. Avoid using broad general statements

as they are catchy.2. Avoid using trivial statement

( unimportant, small, minor) that have little significance from learning stand point . E.g. Gastric word pertains to stomach (T/F)

3. Avoid using long, wordy and complex sentence. Poor: Bleeding of the gum, associated with gingivitis, can be cured by brushing teeth daily (T/F)

Better: Daily brushings will cure gingivitis (T/F)

Page 27: Types of evaluation tool

4. Avoid using negative statement particularly double negative words together.

5. Make sure that both true and false statements are approximately of equal lengthy.

6. Try to make the number of true and false statement almost equal.

7. Be sure that every body accepts the item as true or false without doubt.

Page 28: Types of evaluation tool

MATCHING TYPE TEST ITEMS

It consists of two parallel column with each word, number, symbol, being matched to a word, sentence or phrase in another column.

Characteristics:Premises: the item in the column for which a

match is being made.Response: The column from which a selection

is being made.

Page 29: Types of evaluation tool

USES OF MATCHING TYPE TEST ITEMS It makes possible to measure the large

amount of factual material in relatively short time.

Benefits: Its compact form makes it possible to

cover larger sample of the factual matter of the content in relatively short time.

Test construction is easy and takes less time.

Students can respond to a larger number of questions in limited time.

It takes less time in scoring.Limitations: They are not very suitable to measure

higher cognitive achievements. Sometimes students can answer just by

guessing

Page 30: Types of evaluation tool

SUGGESTIONS FOR WRITING:

1. Use only homogenous material in a single matching exercise.

2. Keep the item relatively short.3. Have more response choices than number of

premises.4. Specify in direction whether responses can

be used more than once or not.5. Place all of the items for one matching

exercise on the same page.

Page 31: Types of evaluation tool

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

Page 32: Types of evaluation tool

The multiple choice question consists of a stem, which presents a problem situation, and several alternatives, which provide possible solutions to the problem.

The stem may be a question or an incomplete statement.

The alternatives include the correct answer and several similar wrong answers, called distracters.

The function of the distracters is to distract

those students who are uncertain of the answer.

Page 33: Types of evaluation tool

EXAMPLE

Page 34: Types of evaluation tool

MCQ in incomplete form or in question form ?Questions form1. What will you do first if an electric appliance in

your office is on fire?A. Dial 000B. Report to the person concernedC. Evacuate from the site at onceD. Switch off the power*

Incomplete statement form 2. If an electric appliance in your office is on fire,

the first thing you will do is to;A. dial 000.B. report to the person concerned.C. evacuate from the site at once.D. switch off the power.*

Page 35: Types of evaluation tool

GENERAL RULES FOR CONSTRUCTING MCQS

1. Each question should be designed to assess an important learning outcome.

2. State the stem in simple and clear language

Page 36: Types of evaluation tool

3. LIST THE ALTERNATIVES VERTICALLY AND IN A LOGICAL ORDER.

Page 37: Types of evaluation tool

3. PLACE AS MUCH OF THE WORDING AS POSSIBLE IN THE STEM

ExamplePoor: In objective testing, the term

objective:A. refers to the method of identifying the learning

outcomes.B. refers to the method of selecting the test

content.C. refers to the method of presenting the problem.D. refers to the method of scoring the answers.*

Better: In objective testing, the term objective refers to the method of:A. identifying the learning outcomes.B. selecting the test content.C. presenting the problem.D. scoring the answers.*

Page 38: Types of evaluation tool

4 . WHENEVER POSSIBLE, STATE THE STEM IN POSITIVE FORM

ExampleBetter: Question 1 : Which one of the

following is a category of the cognitive domain in Bloom’s Taxonomy?A. Comprehension*B. (distracter needed)C. (distracter needed)D. (distracter needed)

Poor : Question 2 : Which one of the following is not a category of the cognitive domain in Bloom’s Taxonomy?A. ComprehensionB. ApplicationC. Analysis D. (answer needed)

Note Question 2 ; Being able to pick the right answer that does not apply provides no guaranty that the student possesses the desired knowledge.

Page 39: Types of evaluation tool

5. WHENEVER NEGATIVE WORDING IS USED IN THE STEM, EMPHASIZE IT

Sometimes the use of negative wording is basic to the assessment of an important learning outcome. For an example, students have to know that certain chemicals should not be mixed in a chemistry lesson. When negative wording is used in the stem, it should be emphasized by using bold or upper cases and being placed near the end of the statement.

Page 40: Types of evaluation tool

ExamplePoor: Which one of the following is not a

desirable practice when preparing MCQs?A. Starting the stem in positive form.B. Using a stem that could function as a short-answer

question.C. Underlining certain words in the stem for

emphasis.D. Shortening the stem by lengthening the

alternatives.*Better: All of the following are desirable

practices when preparing MCQs EXCEPT:A. stating the stem in positive form.B. using a stem that could function as a short-answer

question.C. underlining certain words in the stem for

emphasis.D. shortening the stem by lengthening the

alternatives.*

Page 41: Types of evaluation tool

6. MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE INTENDED ANSWER IS CORRECT OR CLEARLY BEST When the correct-answer from of MCQ is used,

there should be only one correct answer and it should be unquestionably correct. It may also be necessary to include ‘of the following’ in the stem .

ExamplePoor: What is the best method of selecting

subject content for test questions?Better: Which one of the following is the

best method of selecting subject content for test questions?

Page 42: Types of evaluation tool

7 . Check all alternatives are grammatically consistent with the stem and parallel in form. Grammatical inconsistency in tense or article could provide a clue to the correct answer, or at least make some of the distracters ineffective.

ExamplePoor: The recall of factual information can

be measured best with a:A. matching questions.B. multiple-choice questions.C. short-answer question.*D. essay questions.

Better: The recall of factual information can be measured best with:

A. matching questions.B. multiple-choice questions.C. short-answer questions.*D. essay questions.

Page 43: Types of evaluation tool

8.There should not be similarity of wording in both the stem and the correct answer

Poor: Which one of the following would you consult first to locate research articles on achievement testing?

A. Journal of Educational PsychologyB. Journal of Educational MeasurementC. Journal of Consulting PsychologyD. Review of Educational Research*

Page 44: Types of evaluation tool

9. DO NOT INCLUDE TOO MUCH DETAILS IN THE CORRECT ANSWER.Too much details in the correct answer may

provide a clueExamplePoor: Lack of attention to learning outcomes

during test preparation:A. will lower the technical quality of the

questions.B. will make the construction of test questions

more difficult.C. will result in the greater use of essay

questions.D. may result in a test that is less relevant to

the instructional program.*

Page 45: Types of evaluation tool

10. Use of more homogeneous alternatives result in the greater plausibility.

ExamplePoor: Obtaining a dependable ranking

of students is of major concern when using:A. norm-referenced summative tests.*B. behavior descriptions.C. check lists.D. questionnaires.

Better: Obtaining a dependable ranking of students is of major concern when using:A. norm-referenced summative tests.*B. criterion-referenced formative tests.c. -------------------------------------------

Page 46: Types of evaluation tool

12. Avoid using the alternative ‘all of the above’ and use ‘none of the above’ with extreme caution :

The use of ‘all of the above’ as an option makes it possible to answer the question on the basis of partial information.

When ‘none of the above’ is used as the

right answer in a correct-answer type of question, this option may be measuring nothing more than the ability to detect incorrect answers.

ExamplePoor: Which one of the following is a category

of the cognitive domain in Bloom’s Taxonomy?

A. Critical thinking.B. Scientific thinking.C. Reasoning ability.D. None of the above.*

Page 47: Types of evaluation tool

13. DO NOT INCLUDE ALTERNATIVES SUCH AS “BOTH (A) AND (D)” OR “ALL BUT MAINLY (C)”

These complicate the structure of the question and tend to confuse students and/or slow them down.

Page 48: Types of evaluation tool

13. IF NUMBERS ARE TO BE USED AS DISTRACTERS, IT SHOULD BE MENTIONED EITHER IN ASCENDING OR DESCENDING ORDERS.

1. The minimum score in GCS is :a. 2b. 3c. 4d. 5

Poor :The minimum score in GCS is :e. 3f. 2g. 6h. 1

Page 49: Types of evaluation tool

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF MCQ

Strengths1. It allows for a precise interpretation for

content validity.2. Purely objective in scoring and testing.3. Easy to be administered both by students

and the teacher.4. Student success does not depend on

his/her writing skills.5. Results can easily be compiled and

analyzed .6. It can be used with all subject areas.

Page 50: Types of evaluation tool

Limitations

1. It inhibits students from expressing creativity or demonstrating original and imaginative thinking.

2. Question design is restrictive, forcing students to fit their understanding into the designer’s way of understanding a concept.

3. Success of question depends on suitability of distracters.

Page 51: Types of evaluation tool

4. Longer reading time required and students with poor reading skills may be disadvantaged.

5. Some students may guess at answers without understanding them.

6. Time consuming to design good questions. It is very easy to construct poor questions, bad questions may be much worse than other methods of assessing the same learning outcome.

Page 52: Types of evaluation tool

OBSERVATIONAL TECHNIQUES Is especially used in evaluating

psychomotor skills and attitude..It includes: 1. Check list2. Rating scale and 3. Anecdotal report

Page 53: Types of evaluation tool

1. CHECK LIST

It consists of list of behavior or characteristics (on its one hand column) that are essential to a success performance.

The next hand column calls for simple “ Yes/ No”

judgment.

An additional column to jot down the observation made might be useful to give feedback to the students.

Page 54: Types of evaluation tool

SAMPLE OF CHECK LIST FOR PERFORMING DRESSING Name of students--------- Programme---------Year-------- Posted at--

S.N. Behavioral criteria Response Remarks

Yes No1 Prepare the dressing trolley

2 Explain the procedure

3 Arrange equipment conveniently

4 Keep patient in comfortable position and maintain privacy

5 ----------------------------------------

Page 55: Types of evaluation tool

USES OF CHECK LIST It is used to assess those competencies areas

that are critical for gaining the proficiency in the clinical field.

With check list the observer can only record whether certain behavior or characteristics is present or absent

It can not be used to find out the degree or frequency of occurrence.

Page 56: Types of evaluation tool

2. RATING SCALE It measures the degree to which

characteristics are present. It does not mere just note the absence or

presence of desirable behavior. It locate the behavior in a continuum and

notes the qualitative and quantitative abilities.

Page 57: Types of evaluation tool

COMPONENTS OF RATING SCALE Typically rating scale consists of a set of

characteristics that is to be judged on the left hand column and some type of scale on the right hand side indicating degree to which each attribute is present. Thus the components of rating scale are :

1. Stimulus Variable (Criteria): quality to be rated.

2. Response (Options) for rating

Page 58: Types of evaluation tool

TYPES OF RATING SCALE1. Graphing Rating Scale2. Numerical rating Scale

Page 59: Types of evaluation tool

1. GRAPHING RATING SCALE The graphic rating scale is rather broad and here

qualifying words are used rather than numbers.

Observers working hours

never seldom usually always

Ability to get along with others

poor Fair Good Best

Example:

Page 60: Types of evaluation tool

2. NUMERICAL RATING This is one of the simplest type of scale whether the

rater has to simply mark the number representing some qualitative judgments. Some options as the standard of reference are given here:

A. 1-unsatisfactory, 2-Below average, 3- Average, 4- above average, 5- outstanding.

B. 1-poor, 2- Fair, 3- Average, 4- good, 5- bestC. 1- never, 2- seldom, 3- occasionally, 4- frequently,

5- AlwaysD. 1- unsatisfactory, 2- satisfactory, 3- Good, 4- Very

Good, 5- Excellent

Page 61: Types of evaluation tool

EXAMPLE OF NUMERICAL RATING SCALE

Direction: indicate to what degree student performed during her practice teaching by marking her behaviors under appropriate response.

Key: The number represents the values as follows; 1-unsatisfactory, 2-Below average, 3- Average, 4- above

average, 5- outstanding

SN criteria Responses Remarks

1 2 3 4 51

2

3

4

Page 62: Types of evaluation tool

COMMON ERROR IN RATING1. Personal Bias2. Halo Effect3. Logical error

Page 63: Types of evaluation tool

A. PERSONAL BIAS Personal bias error results from evaluators’

natural tendency to rate all the students at approximately same position on the scale.

1. Generosity Error or Leniency Error: The most common type of bias occurs with the evaluator's natural tendency to rate the students at high end of the scale only.

2. Horn effect : Another error occurring less frequently is called Severity error or horn effect, in which the rater favors the lower end of rating in scale continuum.

Page 64: Types of evaluation tool

3. Central tendency error :There are some raters who avoid both extremes of the scale and tend to rate every student within a very narrow range around the center in the rating scale. This tendency to rate everyone at average is called Central tendency error.

Page 65: Types of evaluation tool

B. HALO EFFECT

It is an error when the evaluator’s general impression of the student influences how he/she rates him on individual characteristics.

There is tendency of an evaluator to rate the student’s performance as a whole on the basis of good impression about his/her previous one or two performance.

Page 66: Types of evaluation tool

C. LOGICAL ERROR

It results when the evaluator rates the student high on one characteristics because he/she scored high on the other character that is related to one, which is being measured.

In this situation a student may be rated higher than he/she should have been.

Page 67: Types of evaluation tool

PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE RATING1. The rating scale must specify who is being rated

and for what purposes.2. It must specify the total weight carries .3. The trait/ criteria to be rated must be

educationally significant or must be representative of the essential competencies.

4. The characteristics /criteria must be directly observable.

5. The points on the scale must be defined.6. Rating from different observers must be

combined whenever possible.7. Raters must be instructed to omit ratings when

they feel unqualified to judge.

Page 68: Types of evaluation tool

3. ANECDOTAL REPORT Anecdotal reports are factual description of the

meaningful incidents and events , which the clinical teacher /supervisor observe in a students and record it on plain paper or form.

Factual description of event: what happened? to whom? When ? Where ? Under what circumstances? Who observed ?

Page 69: Types of evaluation tool

BENEFITS OF ANECDOTAL REPORT• It provides the description of actual

behavior in natural situation and that provides check on other evaluation methods.

• It makes possible to gather information on events that is exceptional but significant.

• It acts as a means of directing teacher’s individualized attention to the students.

• It provides cumulative record of student’s progress in competency development.

Page 70: Types of evaluation tool

LIMITATION

1. Time consuming2. Difficult for evaluators to maintain the

objectivity( less reliable)3. Difficult to obtain the sample behavior to

generalize (lacks validity)4. There is tendency on the part of evaluators to

observe only negative incidents and neglect the positive incidents.

Page 71: Types of evaluation tool

PRINCIPLES OF WRITING EFFECTIVE ANECDOTAL NOTES

1. Select meaningful event.2. Observe and record enough of the situation to

make the behavior/incidents meaningful.3. Record the incident as soon as possible after the

observation was made.4. Always to note the description of a single event.5. Keep the factual description of the incident and

your interpretation separate.6. Record both positive as well as negative incidents.7. Collect a number of anecdotes on the student

before drawing inferences concerning typical behavior.

Page 72: Types of evaluation tool

PRACTICAL EXAMINATION Used to assess psychomotor skills and

attitudes of health professional To assess the clinical competence in health

professional

Two types : OSPE OSCE

Page 73: Types of evaluation tool

OSPE(OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED PRACTICAL EXAMINATION ) It is an assessment tool that would test

student’s competence in communication skills, decision making ,psychomotor skills and the knowledge competency as specified in instructional objective

Methodology : Written station Practical station

Page 74: Types of evaluation tool

USES Formative evaluation to facilitate learning through

feedback Summative evaluation to determine student’s

achievement

Advantages Fair and reliable as all the student’s are exposed to

same situation Multiple psychomotor skills and their related

knowledge may be assessed within a limited time A large students can be assessed within given time More objective evaluation as tool is structured and

there is no room for examiner’s opinion to enter Transparent and fair as responses are documented

Page 75: Types of evaluation tool

DISADNTAGES

Tools formulation is time consuming Planning and organization of OSPE is time

consuming As measurement here follows the principle of

reduction in terms of time and content , student’s performance in totality cannot be measured

Page 76: Types of evaluation tool

OSCE(0BJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION ) Assess the component of clinical competence Such as

History taking Physical examination Simple procedure Communication Attitude

Response station Do the procedure practically and

observer will be there to measure student’s achievement

Page 77: Types of evaluation tool

4. ORAL EXAMINATION More probing and requires using deep

explorative thinking on the part of the students

It is also helpful in assessing communication and attitude as well

Page 78: Types of evaluation tool