34
The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF Barry K Logan, Ph.D., NMS Labs National Director, Forensic Services

The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF Hosted by Agilent Technologies on October 8, 2012 Presented by Barry K Logan, Ph.D., NMS Labs National Director, Forensic Services

Citation preview

Page 1: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Barry K Logan, Ph.D., NMS Labs National Director, Forensic Services

Page 2: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Goals

•The Need:

•Accurate, sensitive, versatile tools.

•Identification

•Detection

•Routine analysis

•Novel, complex, esoteric and designer drugs and other analytes in a variety of matrices and sample types.

•The solution:

•LCMS/MS

•LCTOF, LCQTOF

Page 3: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

NMS Labs Center for InnovationCrim. Blood Urine

JWH-018JWH-073

~35 Cpds.

Tim

e

CP47,497

HU210

JWH-018JWH-073JWH-019JWH-250

JWH-081JWH-122JWH-200JWH-210AM-2201AM-694RCS-4RCS-8

DEA scheduling

Professional activitiesClient Enquiries

Crim. Casework

Academic collaboration

International contacts

Vendor activity

JWH-018 metsJWH-073 mets

JWH-019 metJWH-250 metAM-2201 met

JWH-018 metsJWH-073 mets

CP47,497 (C8)

~17 Cpds.

CP47,497 (C7)HU-210

Internet purchases

Web Intelligence

Customer Feedback

~42 Cpds.

JWH-203JWH-022AM-2233AM-1248XLR-11UR-144AKB-48

A720,296

RCS-4 metJWH-122 metJWH-210 metJWH-081 metJWH-200 metJWH-250 metJWH-210 metJWH-081 metJWH-122 metJWH-398 met

Synthetic C

annabinoids

Page 4: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

NMS Labs Center for InnovationCrim. Blood/urine

MDMAMDAMDEA

TFMPPBZPDBZP5-MeO-DIPT…

~30 Cpds.

Tim

e

atropine benzylpiperazinedextromethorphandimethyltryptamineketamineMDAMDMAmescalinephencyclidinescopolamine2C-B 2C-B-FLY2C-T-75-MeO-DIPTAMTBDB MBDBMephedroneLSDbufoteninpsilocinsalvinorin Asalvinorin BTFMPP

DEA scheduling

Professional activitiesClient Enquiries

Crim. Casework

Academic collaboration

International contacts

Vendor activity

~10 Cpds.

Internet purchases

Web Intelligence

Customer Feedback

~70 Cpds.

Blood/urine Expanded

…MDPVMethyloneAmphetaminem-CPPO-desmethyltramadolDMAA3,4-DMMC4-MECPentylone2C-C2C-E2C-I2C-P2C-T-2Bromo-Dragon Fly5-MeO-DALTBuphedroneEthylonePetedronePhenazepam….

Stim

ulants and Hallucinogens

Page 5: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

The Scope

Bath Salts and Stimulant Designer Drugs – Expanded  43 Compounds

• Classical StimulantsAmphetamine, Methamphetamine, MDMA, MDEA, DOM,

DOB, PMA, Cocaine, Benzoylecgonine

• CathinonesCathinone, Mephedrone, Buphedrone, Methylone, Ethylone,

Butylone, Pentylone, Mmethcathinone, Methedrone, Naphyrone, 3-FMC, 4-FMC, 4-MEC, 3,4-DMMC,

Page 6: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

The Scope

Bath Salts and Stimulant Designer Drugs – Expanded  43 Compounds (Continued)

• 2C Series – Stimulants with Hallucinogenic Properties2C-B, 2C-C, 2C-E, 2C-H, 2C-I, 2C-N, 2C-P, 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7

• BenzylpiperazinesBZP, TFMPP, DBZP, MBZP, m-CPP

• OthersPhenazepam, Mitragynine, 7-OH Mitragynine,

O-desmethyltramadol, DMAA

Page 7: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

The Technology

Performance Checklist:

High Sensitivity High Performance High Resolution Mass Accuracy (>5ppm) User Friendly and Adaptable Data Reduction Tools Versatility Stable Performance Robust Design Technical Support Value/ROI

Page 8: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

The Technology

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF)

• Agilent 1200 HPLC system• Agilent 6230 with Jet Stream Technology

• Mass Hunter Software

Page 9: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

The Technology

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF)

• Agilent 1200 HPLC system• Agilent 6230 with Jet Stream Technology• Agilent 6530 QTOF• Mass Hunter Software

Page 10: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF
Page 11: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Time of Flight (TOF)

6200/6500 Series Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF)

Page 12: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) - Control

Page 13: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

•A sample is considered positive if the following are true:

The area is greater than or equal to 25% of the average area of the responses for the two decision point cut off calibrators (10ng/mL).

The retention times are within +/- 0.02 min of the average retention time of the decision point cut off calibrators.

The Mass Accuracy is within +/- 30ppm

Establishing Acceptance Criteria

Page 14: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) - Control

Page 15: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF)

Page 16: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) - Control

Page 17: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Page 18: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Page 19: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Page 20: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Page 21: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Page 22: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Page 23: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Page 24: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 1

Criterion Value

Mass Defect 161.46ppm

RT Diff 0.016min

Apparent Conc.

36ng/mL

Not Confirmed X

Page 25: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 2

Page 26: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 2

Page 27: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 2

Page 28: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 2

MDMA C11H15NO2

193.2423

MethedroneC11H15NO2

193.2423

Page 29: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Analysis

Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (LCTOF/LCQTOF) – Case 2

MDMA C11H15NO2

193.2423

MethedroneC11H15NO2

193.2423

Confirmed

by GCMS

Page 30: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Qualitative Validation

Assay Validation Cut-off Verification Sensitivity and Specificity Interfering Substances Carryover Matrix Matching Stability

Page 31: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Time of Flight

8756B/U Bath Salts and Stimulants Designer Drugs – Expanded 

8085B/U Drug Impaired Driving/DRE Toxicology Bath Salts Add-On

• Test design based on:• 43 compounds• Regular updates based on trends• Compounds found in “bath salts” casework• Federally Scheduled Drugs• Covers additional drugs scheduled in many

states• Drugs emerging in Europe

Page 32: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Designer Drugs Trends

NMS Labs Designer Drugs Trends ReportAugust 2012

http://www.nmslabs.com/services-forensic-designer-drug-trends

Page 33: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

Compare and Contrast

LCMSMS LCTOF LCQTOFTarget Compound Analysis

Comprehensive Screening

Target Compound analysis

Must set up scanning groups

Acquire all data and query database later

Acquires more limited data in QTOF mode

WYSIWYG Post hoc identification Post hoc identification

Compound specific transitions

Molecular formula information

Molecular formula information for fragments

Limited structural confirmation

No structural information

Limited Structural information

May differentiate isobars

TOF does not differentiate isobars

May differentiate isobars

Lower Cost Higher cost Even higher cost

Page 34: The Challenges of Analytical Method Validation for Hallucinogens and Designer Stimulants in Biological Samples Using LC-TOF

•NMS Labs• Alex Maggitti• Sherri Kacinko• Matthew McMullin• Fran Diamond

•Agilent• Tom Gluodenis• Jay Levine• Mary Cuddrye• John Hughes

Acknowledgements