Upload
hesham-al-inany
View
474
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Is there a difference between recombinant and urinary hCG? this talk may help in answering this
Citation preview
Triggering Ovulation
Recombinant Vs Urinary Gonadotrophins
Introduction
LH surge is very important in the final follicular maturation and triggering ovulation.
In addition, the LH surge promotes luteinization forming an active corpus luteum.
These effects of LH are essential for conception to occur
For triggering
urinary hCG has been used for several years to mimic the endogenous LH surge.
Recently recombinant hCG and LH have been introduced . The high purity of this product facilitates subcutaneous injection and hence self-administration
Objective
To investigate the efficacy and safety of (rhCG) or recombinant LH preparation vs (uhCG) for inducing final follicular maturation and triggering ovulation
Types of studies
Only truely randomised controlled trials in which Subfertile couples undergoing triggering ovulation were included
Types of interventions
Recombinant hCG or recombinant LH versus urinary hCG for triggering of ovulation.
Primary outcomes
ongoing pregnancy / live birth rate (per woman or per couple)
Secondary outcomes
incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)
clinical pregnancy rate per cycle number of oocytes retrieved miscarriage rate per woman randomised
Search strategy for identification of studies The Cochrane MDSG Group specialised
register MEDLINE EMBASE database Hand searching of abstracts of major
international meetings. Contacting pharmaceutical industries
To assess internal Validity
Was the assigned treatment adequately concealed prior to allocation?
Was an "intention to treat" analysis applied? Were the outcome assessors blind to assignment
status? Were the treatment and control group comparable
at entry? Were the subjects & treatment providers blind to
assignment status following allocation? Were the withdrawals <10% of the study
population
To assess external Validity
Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria for entry clearly defined?
Were the outcome measures used clearly defined?
Were the accuracy and precision of the outcome measures adequate?
Was the timing of the outcome measures appropriate?
Allocation concealment
The quality of allocation concealment was graded as either adequate (A), unclear (B), or inadequate (C).
Analysis
The results were combined for meta-analysis with RevMan software (using the Mantel-Haenszel method).
Results were pooled using a fixed-effects model only after confirming that heterogeneity was not present
Results Fourteen trials were identified and only seven
studies were included Chang et al., 2001, Driscoll et al, 2000, The European rHCG Study Group, 2000 The International rHCG Study Group, 2001 The European rLH Study Group, 2001, Manau et al, 2002 Serono Study 21447
Description of studies All trials had parallel design with true
randomisation using computer generated randomization list
Randomization was done at time of recruitment of participants
All trials were multicenter except Manau , 2002 All trials were in IVF/ICSI cycles except IRHCG
Group, 2001 (O.I) The methodological quality of the trials was high All were Double blinded except (Manau & Chang)
R-LH studies
pregnancy rate was found to be significantly lower when the recombinant LH is used for triggering ovulation,
hence, Serono company has decided not to pursue further development and registration of recombinant LH high dose for triggering ovulation.
Accordingly, The European rLH Study Group, 2001, Manau et al and Serono Study 21447 were excluded from the analysis but kept in the review
Ongoing pregnancy
O.R 0.98 [95% C.I 0.69-1.39]
Clinical Pregnancy rate
O.R 0.98 [95% C.I 0.71-1.36)
OHSS
O.R 1.83 [95% C.I 0.75-4.51)
Miscarriage rate
O.R 1.1 [95% C.I 0.52-2.31)
Tolerability
The three, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind and double-dummy studies, Driscoll et al, 2000; ERHCG Group, 2000; IRHCG Group, 2001 consistently found a 2- to 3-fold reduction in the incidence of local site reactions.
Chang et al, 2001-an open RCT reported no difference between both drugs.
Implications for practice
There is no difference in clinical outcomes between urinary and recombinant hCG for induction of final follicular maturation and triggering ovulation.
How To Choose
Additional factors should be considered when making the choice, including safety, cost and drug availability.
THANK YOU