64
Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis Vipul Gupta Neurointerventional Surgery (Interventional Neuroradiology) Institute of Neurosciences Medanta the Medicity

Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Vipul GuptaNeurointerventional Surgery

(Interventional Neuroradiology)Institute of Neurosciences

Medanta the Medicity

Page 2: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Acute stroke :Penumbra and Treatment Options

0

10

20

30

min

CB

F (m

l/1

00

g/m

in)

300 9060 4120 5 6 24 48h

Infarct-threshold

Penumbra

Vital tissue

InfarctSingle cellnecrosis

3

Page 3: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

IV tPA- indications; ASA/AHA guidelinesStroke - 2013

Less than 10% patients are eligible

Page 4: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

ECASS 352.4% vs. 45.2%; OR, 1.34; 95% CI,1.02 to 1.76; P=0.04.

IV tPA beyond 3-hours….

Page 5: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

3- 6 hours

PWI/ DWI > 1.2

Non significant

difference in

good outcome

Page 6: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 7: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• 53 studies, 2066 patients

• Sp.- 24%, IV tPA- 46%, IA- 64%, Mechanical- 84%

• Good outcome more in recanalized patients (OR- 4.4)

• Less mortality in recanalized patients

Page 8: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

•Distal MCA – 44%

•Proximal MCA - 30%

•Terminal ICA - 6%

•Tandem cervical ICA/MCA

-27%

•Basilar artery- 30%

Page 9: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 10: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Case selection- mechanical thrombectomy

• IV-tPA given in MVO- but not effective-(bridging)

• IV-tPA not possible-( >4.5 hrs, wake-up strokes, anti-coagulants, recent surgery etc. ) (and MVO)

Page 11: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 12: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Issues

• 21 sites- 8-years- 127 patients

• Revascularization in 67%, seventeen procedural complications

• Mostly used MERCI device- first generation;

• Trial completed over 8-years !!!

Time to groin puncture was 6 hrs 21 min !!!

Imaging to puncture- 2hrs 4min !!!

Page 13: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 14: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Intra-arterial methods

• IA-tPA- 71% (51)

• Microsonic – 71% SV Infusion with

tPA (14)

• Merci- 73% (77)

• Penumbra- 85% (39)

• Solitaire- 75% (4)- used in 1.6%

Rapidity of treatment

• IMS 1 and II trials, 30-minute delay

– 10% less probability of independent

existence

• Delay in IMS III was 32 min longer

than IMS I study

Case selection?

Imaging for MVO, older devices; delay

Page 15: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Subset analysis

IMS III– CTA group

– with ICA and

MCA - positive

Page 16: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

IMS -III

Page 17: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

31.5 36.646.9

0

20

40

60

MS PS RS

MRS<=2

MS

PS

RS

MERCI

PENUMBRA

SOLITAIRE

AJNR, Jan, 2013

Page 18: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Randomised trials – General criterion

• Randomised (Intervention Vs Standard

medical therapy)

• Documented site of occlusion.

• Time based: 6 hrs (initiation of IA therapy)

• Small Core

• Predominantly stent retrievers.

Page 19: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

MR CLEAN

(Netherlands)

ESCAPE

(CANADIAN)

EXTEND IA

(AUSTRALIAN)

SWIFT PRIME

(USA)

REVASCAT

(SPANISH)

Page 20: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Comparison of protocol- Randomised (Intervention

Vs Standard medical therapy)

• Documented MVO.- ICA, MCA (M1, M2)

• Time based: 6 hrs (initiation of IA therapy)-

(8 hrs – REVASCAT; 12 hrs – ESCAPE)

• Small Core - CT ASPECTS ≥ 6

• CTP – EXTEND IA; SWIFT PRIME

• Predominantly stent retrievers.

• 86.1 to 100% (100 % in EXTEND IA & SWIFT PRIME)

• (NIHSS scores were 17 (interquartile range, 13–21)

Page 21: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

TICI 2B/3 – 59% - 88% - (previous trials 25%, 41%)

Recanalization – TICI 2B/3

Page 22: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Absolute Benefit (good outcome) : 13.5% to 31.4%(Statistically significant)

mRS (90 d)

Page 23: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

no significant difference

sICH

Page 24: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Device complication

Page 25: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Absolute mortality benefit : 8.6%(Statistically significant in ESCAPE)

Mortality

Page 26: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Comparison of NNT:

EVT: NNT (benefit) - 3.1 to 4.2 (excluding MR CLEAN)

IV tPA ( 3 – 4.5 hours) – 13.8 (ECASS – 3)

Primary PCI (prevent re-infarction) – 33

Page 27: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

IV tPA – Does it make a difference?

Subgroup analysis (ESCAPE) -

Received intravenous r-tPA – 235; (OR, 2.5 [1.6–4.0])

No intravenous r-tPA – 76; (OR, 2.6 [1.1– 5.9])

Conclusion:

Stent retriever based mechanical thrombectomy to be

offered if there are contraindications to IV tPA

Page 28: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Advanced Imaging:

CTA used to detect MVO

CT Perfusion:

SWIFT Prime – Criterion changed (71 with perfusion; 125 without)

possibility that patients who may have responded to therapy

were excluded.

Site of occlusion should be documented:

studies not designed to validate the utility of the advanced

imaging selection criteria

Page 29: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Techniques:

Stent retriever

Stent retriever + Proximal balloon guiding

catheter (flow arrest)

Stent Retriever +

Lesional aspiration

(Distal access catheters)Humphries W, Hoit D, Doss VT, et al. Distal aspiration with retrievable stent assisted thrombectomy for the treatment of acute

ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:90-94.

Nguyen TN, Malisch T, Castonguay AC, et al. Balloon guide catheter improves revascularization and clinical outcomes with the

Solitaire device: analysis of the North American Solitaire Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2014;45:141-145.

Page 30: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

AHA/ ASA guideline 2015:

Patients should receive endovascular therapy with a stent

retriever if they meet all the following criteria (Class I; Level of

Evidence A). (New recommendation):

prestroke mRS score 0 to 1

acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous r-tPA within 4.5

hours of onset

causative occlusion of the internal carotid artery or proximal

MCA (M1)

age ≥18 years

NIHSS score of ≥6

ASPECTS of ≥ 6

treatment can be initiated (groin puncture) within 6 hours of

symptom onset

Page 31: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

AHA/ ASA guideline:

Carefully selected patients with anterior circulation

occlusion who have contraindications to intravenous r-

tPA, endovascular therapy with stent retrievers

completed within 6 hours of stroke onset is reasonable

(Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).

Carefully selected patients with acute ischemic stroke in

whom treatment can be initiated (groin puncture) within 6

hours of symptom onset and who have causative

occlusion of the M2 or M3 portion of the MCAs, anterior

cerebral arteries, vertebral arteries, basilar artery, or

posterior cerebral arteries (Class IIb; Level of Evidence

C)

Page 32: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

AHA/ ASA guideline:

Stent retrieval may be reasonable for patients

with acute ischinitiated (groin puncture) within 6

hours emic stroke in whom treatment can be of

symptom onset and who have prestroke mRS

score of >1, ASPECTS >1, ASPECTS <6, or

NIHSS score <6 and causative occlusion of the

internal carotid artery or proximal MCA (M1)

Observing patients after intravenous r-tPA to

assess for clinical response before pursuing

endovascular therapy is not required to achieve

beneficial outcomes and is not recommended.

(Class III; Level of Evidence B-R).

Page 33: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Comparison of IAT processes.

Brijesh P. Mehta et al. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000963

© 2014 Brijesh P. Mehta et al.

Time is the key ….post Quality improvement (QI) –

Parallel processingPre and post Quality improvement (QI) – Parallel processing

Page 34: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

•68/M, DM, HTN, CAD, underwent PTCA to LAD•Admitted for surgery of aortic stenosis.•Double anti-platelets was stopped•Patient developed acute onset right side weakness with aphasia.

IV- tPA given, no improvement

Page 35: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 36: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• Left hemiplegia, left UL and LL 0/5

• 5:14AM

Page 37: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

6:22AM

Page 38: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

8:07 AM

Patient made gradual recovery

Left LL 4/5 and UL 3/5 - 30 day follow up

mRS at 90 days- 0

Page 39: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• 60 years old female.Acute onset left hemiparesis and left facial weakness; CT Brain , CTP and CTA done 6 1/2 hours after ictus.

Page 40: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Issues …

Beyond 6 hours – Should you consider MT?

ESCAPE: up to 12-hours – positive trial

6 hours

49 patients

rate ratio, 1.7; (95% CI, 0.7 to 4.0)

Not significant; however few numbers.

REVASCAT: upto 12 hours, positive trial

Data not provided.

Page 41: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• Category: < 6H Vs > 6 h (or) unknown time [UOS] (or) wake up [WUS].

• T < 6H – 654

• T > 6H - 205 (128 T > 6H, 55 WUS and 22 UOS).

Non significant difference in clinical

outcome, recanalization rates and SICH

Page 42: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Tissue at risk/ core > 3Later time windows/

wake up

Page 43: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• 63 /M, AVR, Coumadin

• INR of 2.5

• RT hemiparesis - 2/5 in leg and 0/5 in arm

• Global aphasia

CBF CBV

Solitaire stent was deployed

Issues….. Intracranial atherosclerosis

Page 44: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Mechanical thrombolysis –TOC for MVOhours

• Recent trials are watershed in stroke management

• Mechanical recanalization is standard part of stroke treatment

• Issues – beyond 6 (7.3), tandem lesions, technique evolution, advacned imaging role…

• Challenge and responsibility !

• Focus on building stroke intervention centers and network of peripheral and referral stroke centers

Page 45: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 46: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 47: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• 60 years old female.

• h/o hypertension and hypothyroidism

• Acute onset left hemiparesis and left facial weakness

• No history of LOC/seizures

• CT Brain , perfusion and angio done 6 1/2 hours after ictus.

Page 48: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 49: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 50: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

2 months later

Page 51: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• 41 year old male, Severe MR, EF 20%

• Stroke in sleep, NIHSS 14 on admission

Page 52: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

6:22AM

Page 53: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Patient made gradual recovery

Left LL 4/5 and UL 3/5 - 30 day follow up

mRS at 90 days- 0

Page 54: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• Retrospective; September 2010 and April 2013

• Compared proximal vs distal approach

• Weight-adapted bolus of tirofiban followed by a continuous infusion

for 24 h to prevent in-stent thrombosis

• After exclusion of cerebral hemorrhage on follow-up imaging, 500 mg

of acetylsalicylacid (ASA) and 300 mg of clopidogrel

Page 55: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 56: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis
Page 57: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

ISC 2013

Page 58: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Clinical …• Left hemiplegia, left UL and LL 0/5

• 5:14AM

Page 59: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

6:22AM

Page 60: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

8:07 AM

Patient made gradual recovery

Left LL 4/5 and UL 3/5 - 30 day follow up

mRS at 90 days- 0

Page 61: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• 63 /M, AVR, Coumadin

• INR of 2.5

• RT hemiparesis - 2/5 in leg and 0/5 in arm

• Global aphasia

CBF CBV

Solitaire stent was deployed

Page 62: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

• 60 years old female.Acute onset left hemiparesis and left facial weakness; CT Brain , CTP and CTA done 6 1/2 hours after ictus.

Page 63: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

For more information on:

STROKE & NEUROVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS:

URL:www.sanif.co.in

Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/strokeawarenessindiahttps://www.facebook.com/vipul.gupta.35175

Twitterhttps://twitter.com/drvipulgupta25

LinkedINhttps://in.linkedin.com/pub/dr-vipul-gupta/51/8a1/25a

YouTubeChannel: Stroke & Neurovascular Interventionswww.youtube.com/c/StrokeNeurovascularInterventionsfoundation

Dr Vipul Gupta

Page 64: Recent evidence for mechanical thrombolysis

Thank you ….