40

Proximal humerus fractures

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 2: Proximal humerus fractures

2-4 % of upper extremity # 5% of all #. second most common fracture of the upper

extremity. Pt > 65 yrs – third most common # 65% of # occur in Pt’s > 60 yrs F:M – 3:1 Incidence increases with age.

Page 3: Proximal humerus fractures

Old Pts low energy trauma. [FOOSH] Most # are nondisplaced, good prognosis –

nonsurgical Risk factors: Poor quality bone impaired

vision & balance, medical comorbidities, decreased muscle tone.

Young Pts – High energy trauma. Severe soft tissue disruption always require

surgical intervention Seizures & electric shock – indirect causes.

Page 4: Proximal humerus fractures

Articular head, G.T, L.T, for insertion for rotator cuff & shaft.

Metaphyseal flare – surgical neck most common site of #

Anatomic neck. Articular segment is almost spherical, with a

diameter of curvature averaging 46 mm (ranging from 37 to 57 mm)

Inclination of the humeral head relative to the shaft averages 130 degrees

Page 5: Proximal humerus fractures

Humeral retroversion – 18*-40* Bone density of subchondral bone is

strongest. Greater tuberosity has three regions into

which the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor insert

Subscapularis tendon lesser tuberosity, which is separated from the greater tuberosity by the bicipital groove.

Page 6: Proximal humerus fractures

PH is formed by 3 ossification centres Fusion of these ossification centers at the

physis creates a weakened area that is susceptible to fracture .

Primary deforming forces – pectoralis major & rotator cuff.

Blood supply: distal branches of axillary artery.

Arcuate artery of Liang – supplies H. head. Tethered trifucation – at the level of surgical

neck – vascular injury.

Page 7: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 8: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 9: Proximal humerus fractures

Ecchymosis appears 24-48 hrs. Look for rib, scapular, cervical # in high

energy trauma. Concurrent brachial plexus injury 5% Axillary nerve is susceptible in anterior #

dislocation. Gentle rotation of arm & palpation of # -

guide for # stability .

Page 10: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 11: Proximal humerus fractures

Scapular AP, Y- lateral, abducted & Velpeau axillary view.

CT – to assess glenoid #, dislocation, communition, & posteriorly displaced GT or medially displaced LT fragments.

MRI: Pt had preinjury shoulder problem [cuff tear], pathological #, nonunion.

Page 12: Proximal humerus fractures

Edwin smith papyrus: closed / open. Kocher [1896]: location of #,

supratubercular, periT, infraT, subT. Codman: 11 different types, described #

along the lines of epiphyseal scars. Watson & Jones: based on mechanism of

injury AO – 27 possible subgroups, emphasizes on

vascular supply of articular portion of PH.

Page 13: Proximal humerus fractures

DePalma and Cautilli emphasized the difference between fractures with and without dislocation of the joint surfaces

Neer classification: # classified by evaluating the displacement of parts from each other.

Criteria to consider as a part, fragment must be rotated 45* or 1 cm from the another fragment.

Page 14: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 15: Proximal humerus fractures

Articular surface # are two types Impression # mostly occurs in association

with chronic dislocations. Head splitting # are associated with other #

in which splitting of AS is significant component.

Neer -Commonly used because it based on the regional anatomy & emphasis on degree of diplacement.

Page 16: Proximal humerus fractures

almost exclusively in older people tend to develop periarthritis about the

shoulder, these fractures should be treated by methods that allow early motion and early restoration of function

Page 17: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 18: Proximal humerus fractures

Most # [>80%] can be treated conservatively.

Two part nondisplaced is the most common variant.

3 & 4 part # represent 13-16% of PH%. Good outcome doesn’t require anatomic

reduction. Considerations: assessment of #, bone

quality, status of rotator cuff. Pt age, activity level, preinjury health.

Page 19: Proximal humerus fractures

Non-displaced # - < 5mm of superior or 10 mm of posterior GT displacement in active Pts & < 10 mm of superior displacement in nondominant arm in sedentary pt.

Surgical neck # - any bone contact in elderly pt, in young pt <50% shaft diameter displacement & <45* angulation in dominant arm.

Page 20: Proximal humerus fractures

Reduced demand: Pt willing to accept stiffness

Poor health: pt unable to tolerate surgery & anaesthesia.

Poor rehabilitation candidate.

Page 21: Proximal humerus fractures

Principle: early protection & combined with gradual mobilization.

Early sling immobilisation for 7-10 days. Active finger, wrist, elbow movts By 2 wks, gentle active assisted ROM ex By 6 wks, light resistive ex By 3 months, shoulder strengthening ex.

Page 22: Proximal humerus fractures

most commonly occur as a result of seizures or secondary to glenohumeral dislocations.

These often reduce anatomically with reduction of the humeral head and can be managed nonoperatively.

displaced more than 1 cm, open reduction and internal fixation are required

fixation with screws, wire, or suture as dictated by the size of the fragment, the comminution, or the quality of the bone

Page 23: Proximal humerus fractures

If tuberosity has been displaced and retracted, a significant tear in the rotator cuff mechanism exists also,

Careful identification and repair of the rotator cuff defect are required

Page 24: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 25: Proximal humerus fractures

Two-part # involving the anatomical neck render the articular fragment avascular and may require prosthetic replacement.

Involving the surgical neck usually can be treated by a sling, hanging arm cast, or other conservative measures.

Indications for operative treatment of two-part fractures include open fractures, the inability to obtain or maintain an acceptable closed reduction, injury to the axillary artery, and selected multiple trauma patients

Page 26: Proximal humerus fractures

Indications for CRPF # without significant communition in pt with

good quality bone. Pt should be willing to comply with postop

care plan. Contraindications: Severe communition &

osteopenia. Inability to reduce the #.

Page 27: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 28: Proximal humerus fractures

The safe starting point for the proximal lateral pins and the end point for the greater tuberosity pins.

X = distance from the superiormost aspect of the humeral head to the inferiormost aspect of the humeral head.

2X = the starting point for the proximal lateral pin.

The end point for the greater tuberosity pin should be >2 cm from the inferior most margin of the humeral head.

Page 29: Proximal humerus fractures

Shoulder immobilised for 4 wks Pt were reviewed every wk for checking the

pins position, Pins can be removed by 4-6 wks time, begin

assisted motion.

Page 30: Proximal humerus fractures

If open reduction is necessary, internal fixation with a combination of intramedullary rod fixation and tension band technique or intramedullary rod fixation with a proximal locking screw.

A hand-bent semitubular plate used as a blade-plate device also is satisfactory in osteopenic bone.

In younger patients, an AO buttress plate with screws also is useful.

Page 31: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 32: Proximal humerus fractures

ORIF one of the tuberosities remains with the

articular head fragment, thereby retaining its vascularity

Page 33: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 34: Proximal humerus fractures

Rationale: injury caused avascularity of articular segment which even with a satisfactory reduction & fixation would eventually collapse – posttraumatic arthritis.

Indications:1. four part# & # dislocations, 2. three part # & # dislocations in elderly

pts with osteopenic bone, anatomic neck 3. Head splitting #4. Anatomic neck # that can not be R & F.5. Chronic dislocation with impression #

involving >40% articular surface.

Page 35: Proximal humerus fractures

More likely after surgical than nonoperative # care.

Careful postop followup is necessary.1) INSTABILITY Glenoid # , rotator cuff tear, muscle

atony. ORIF glenoid, repair of cuff, isometric ex.2) MALUNION Incorrect diagnosis, poor reduction,

inadequate fixation. Release of adhesions, with or with out

osteotomy Vs trim of prominence.

Page 36: Proximal humerus fractures

3) NONUNION Motion too early, poor bone. Preserved head – ORIF & BG Cavitated head – HHR4) AVASCULAR NECROSIS: Four part # & dislocation HHR5) NEUROVASCULAR INJURY Four part with head in axilla If nerve injury + at the time of closed injury,

prognosis is good.

Page 37: Proximal humerus fractures

6) INFECTION: Immune compromise & extensive soft

tissue loss Hard ware removal & debridement.7) ARTHRITIS Hardware penetrating the jt8) Refractory shoulder stiffness9) CHARCOT SHOULDER: unusual fragmentation occurs after #10) Heterotopic bone formation. Soft tissue injury, repeated manipulation,

delayed reduction beyond 7 days.

Page 38: Proximal humerus fractures
Page 39: Proximal humerus fractures

NEER CLASSIFICATION: Classified according to the amount of

displacement. Grade I fracture is displaced less than 5

mm. Grade IV fracture involves total

displacement.

Page 40: Proximal humerus fractures

Open reduction indicated for 1) the rare displaced Salter-Harris types III

and IV fractures, 2) interposition of the biceps tendon in the

fracture site, 3) fracture-dislocations4) open fractures