Upload
ram-abhinav
View
360
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Carcinoma cervix is the second most commonly occuring cancer in India. Brachytherapy forms the most important part radiation therapy Low dose rate Brachytherapy – Gold Standard Experience more than a century
Citation preview
Low Dose Rate Versus High Dose
Rate brachytherapy in Ca.Cervix
DEBATE
Introduction
• Carcinoma cervix is the second most commonly occuring cancer in India.
• Brachytherapy forms the most important part radiation therapy
• Low dose rate Brachytherapy – Gold Standard
• Experience more than a century….
1992 !!
HDR for Ca. Cerix ??
Radiobiological advantages…..
Repair
The lower the dose rate of radiation a cell is exposedto, the greater the likelihood of repair.
Late-reacting normal tissues seem more capable of repair than tumor
The tumor is preferentially killed over normal tissue.
Reoxygenation
• Because of the duration of administration of LDR, acute hypoxia corrects within the tumor during treatment
• Oxygen enhancement ratio is lower for LDR than for HDR.
Reassortment
During the overall treatment time of LDR, tumor cells may pass from the relatively radioresistant phases of late S and early G2 to the more radiosensitive phases of G2 and M
Repopulation
The continuous administration of LDR prevents repopulation during treatment.
Biological equivalent dose
• Calculated from LDR
• a/b ratio…
• Based on formulas !!!!
Toxicity
High dose / Fraction
Increased Late complications
HDR delivery
Total Dose?Dose per fraction?Conversion?Schedule?
NO STANDARD GUIDELINES
Orton et al, Metaanalysis
Optimisation???
URETHRA RECTUM
HDR for all cervix patients??
Small tumor & good vaginal anatomy
Vaginal anatomy – increase in complications
Bulky central disease with high chance of central recurrance
• Severely criticized
• Lacks any description of statistical methods,
• Were not randomized trials
• Many have never been published,
• None were referenced.
• Some of the LDR results used in the comparison are very poor, with complication rates several times higher than those described by Fletcher or Perez
What happens at longer follow up??
DSS
Pelvic recurrance free survival
• Teshima et al ; 1993
• 430 patients reported on 10-year OS
• 44% (114 out of 259) in the HDR arm versus52.6% (90 out of 171) in the LDR arm
Other studies…
Other Factors…
• Patient’s expense…
• Source life…
• Need for intense QA…
• Setup up cost…
Important Msgs…
Radiobiology
Dose, Fraction & Schedule
Long term survival
Optimisation
XXX?
Conclusion
• Carcinoma cervix – Life threatening disease
• For the price of convenience …, survival should never be compromised
• LDR brachytherapy should be the standard of care in carcinoma cervix until long term efficacy of HDR is proven….
Than
k You