41
Low Dose Rate Versus High Dose Rate brachytherapy in Ca.Cervix DEBATE

Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Carcinoma cervix is the second most commonly occuring cancer in India. Brachytherapy forms the most important part radiation therapy Low dose rate Brachytherapy – Gold Standard Experience more than a century

Citation preview

Page 1: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Low Dose Rate Versus High Dose

Rate brachytherapy in Ca.Cervix

DEBATE

Page 2: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Introduction

• Carcinoma cervix is the second most commonly occuring cancer in India.

• Brachytherapy forms the most important part radiation therapy

Page 3: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

• Low dose rate Brachytherapy – Gold Standard

• Experience more than a century….

Page 4: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

1992 !!

Page 5: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 6: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

HDR for Ca. Cerix ??

Page 7: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 8: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Radiobiological advantages…..

Page 9: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Repair

The lower the dose rate of radiation a cell is exposedto, the greater the likelihood of repair.

Late-reacting normal tissues seem more capable of repair than tumor

The tumor is preferentially killed over normal tissue.

Page 10: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Reoxygenation

• Because of the duration of administration of LDR, acute hypoxia corrects within the tumor during treatment

• Oxygen enhancement ratio is lower for LDR than for HDR.

Page 11: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Reassortment

During the overall treatment time of LDR, tumor cells may pass from the relatively radioresistant phases of late S and early G2 to the more radiosensitive phases of G2 and M

Page 12: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Repopulation

The continuous administration of LDR prevents repopulation during treatment.

Page 13: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Biological equivalent dose

• Calculated from LDR

• a/b ratio…

• Based on formulas !!!!

Page 14: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Toxicity

High dose / Fraction

Increased Late complications

Page 15: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

HDR delivery

Total Dose?Dose per fraction?Conversion?Schedule?

NO STANDARD GUIDELINES

Page 16: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Orton et al, Metaanalysis

Page 17: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Optimisation???

Page 18: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 19: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

URETHRA RECTUM

Page 20: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

HDR for all cervix patients??

Page 21: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Small tumor & good vaginal anatomy

Vaginal anatomy – increase in complications

Bulky central disease with high chance of central recurrance

Page 22: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 23: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 24: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 25: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 26: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 27: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 28: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

• Severely criticized

• Lacks any description of statistical methods,

• Were not randomized trials

• Many have never been published,

• None were referenced.

• Some of the LDR results used in the comparison are very poor, with complication rates several times higher than those described by Fletcher or Perez

Page 29: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

What happens at longer follow up??

Page 30: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 31: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

DSS

Page 32: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Pelvic recurrance free survival

Page 33: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 34: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix
Page 35: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

• Teshima et al ; 1993

• 430 patients reported on 10-year OS

• 44% (114 out of 259) in the HDR arm versus52.6% (90 out of 171) in the LDR arm

Page 36: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Other studies…

Page 37: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Other Factors…

Page 38: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

• Patient’s expense…

• Source life…

• Need for intense QA…

• Setup up cost…

Page 39: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Important Msgs…

Radiobiology

Dose, Fraction & Schedule

Long term survival

Optimisation

XXX?

Page 40: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Conclusion

• Carcinoma cervix – Life threatening disease

• For the price of convenience …, survival should never be compromised

• LDR brachytherapy should be the standard of care in carcinoma cervix until long term efficacy of HDR is proven….

Page 41: Low dose rate versus high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix

Than

k You