33
@ theshoulderdoc Subacromial Impingement My Approach (in 2016) Lennard Funk Wrightington Upper Limb Unit

Impingement modern approach 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

@ theshoulderdoc

Muslim = TerroristImmigrant = Terrorist

@ theshoulderdoc

Impingement = SpursImpingement = ASD

@ theshoulderdoc

Subacromial Impingement

My Approach (in 2016)Lennard Funk

Wrightington Upper Limb Unit

@ theshoulderdoc

HistoryJarjavay 1867- described subacromial bursitis Duplay 1872- periarthritis humeroscapularisCodman 1934 - described supraspinatus tearsArmstrong 1949 - Acromionectomy for Supraspinatus Syndrome 1950s - 1970s - Radical AcromionectomiesNeer 1972 - Limited Anterior AcromionectomyNeer 1982 - Impingement Syndrome & Extrinsic Theory

@ theshoulderdoc

Neer (1982)

Non-operative treatment

Surgery is considered only after 18m of rehab & injection.Limited bursectomy & divide CAL

Indications for surgery: 1. No cuff tear after 1yr rehab + positive injection test 2. Cuff tear full thicknessAcromioplasty+/- Cuff repair

@ theshoulderdoc

Over 40yrs Impingement Sign Impingement Test Normal Arthrogram Non-op for 18 monthsNeer Stage 2

@ theshoulderdoc

AcromioplastyMinnesota, USA: six-fold incr. from 1980 to 1985

New York State: 254% incr. from 1999 to 2008Yu et al. Arthroscopy. 2010Vitale et al. JBJS-Am. 2010

@ theshoulderdoc

A review of the Rochester Epidemiology Project servicing Olmstead County, Minnesota, USA demonstrated an almost six-fold increase in the incidence of acromioplasty, from 3.3 per 100,000 between 1980 and 1985 to 19.0 per 100,000 between 2000 and 2005 [5]. Similarly, a review of the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System ambulatory surgery database showed a 254% increase in the volume of acromioplasties from 1999 to 2008, representing an increase from 30.0 to 101.9 per 100,000. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database for Part 2 candidates demonstrated a 142% increase in acromioplasty (Current Procedural Terminology codes 23130 and 29826) from 1998 to 2008. This represented an increase from a mean of 2.6 to a mean of 6.3 per candidate [6]

Arthroscopic Acromioplasty (ASD)UK: 746% incr. from 2000 to 2010Judge et al. BJJ. 2014

@ theshoulderdoc

The number of procedures rose by 746.4%, from 2523 patients in 2000/2001 (5.2 per 100 000 (95% CI 5.0 to 5.4)) to 21 355 in 2009/2010

ASD vs. other treatments

From: Movarek et al. S&E. 2012NO DIFFERENCENONE FOLLOWED NEERS CRITERIA!!ALL DIFFERENT STUDY DESIGNS

@ theshoulderdoc

Current OpinionsImpingement:Does not existNever needs surgeryASD is successful, so does need surgeryNever give steroid injections

@ theshoulderdoc

Case Example42 year old office worker3 months painpouring kettleoverhead reachingsleeping on affected shoulderNSAIDs ineffective

@ theshoulderdoc

ClinicalFull Passive GHJ ROM (incl. Int Rot in Abd.)No WeaknessSymptom Modification Tests NegativeACJ Tests negative

Neers Sign positive - mid-arc!Copelands modification positive

@ theshoulderdoc

Scapula Assistance + Scapula Correction

Scapula ModificationsJeremy Lewis. BJSM. 2009Ben Kibler

@ theshoulderdoc

Thoracic ModificationJeremy Lewis. BJSM. 2009

@ theshoulderdoc

Techniques to reduce the thoracic kyphosisScapular positioning techniquesHumeral head positioning proceduresPain and symptom neuromodulation procedures

SSMPShoulder Symptom Modification Procedures Jeremy Lewis. BJSM. 2009

@ theshoulderdoc

Neer & Copeland SignsNeers Sign = mid-arc pain on passive elevation in IRCopeland = pain eliminated repeated in ER

@ theshoulderdoc

ImagingPlain X-Rays - OA, Calcific tendonitisUltrasound Scan - rotator cuff tear, calcific tendonitis, bicepsMRI - all of the above, plus ACJ oedema and osteophytes, GHJ capsulitis,

@ theshoulderdoc

ManagementAll secondary causes excluded.i.e. Neers Stage 2 Patient-specific rehab:SimpleLifestylePainlessAssess and address as necessary:Cuff; Scapula, Posture, SpinePainless!!

@ theshoulderdoc

Patient Guide

@ theshoulderdoc

Subacromial Injections

Reduce bursal inflammation

Corticosteroids:Temporary Anti-inflammatory onlyShort-acting (weeks)No good evidence for dose, frequency, typeProteolytic

@ theshoulderdoc

Subacromial Injections

WHY?To aid rehab.

WHEN?When pain restricting rehab.

@ theshoulderdoc

Accuracy (Blind)76% Posterior approach69% Anteromedial approach66% correlation between injectors confidence and accuracy (MRI)Accurate injection = pain reductionVAS & CS returned to pre-injection at 6 weeks in all !51% rotator cuff injectedHenkus et al. Arthroscopy. 22(3):277-82. March 2006

@ theshoulderdoc

@ theshoulderdoc

@ theshoulderdoc

Accuracy StudiesEustace JA, Brophy DP, Gibney RP, Bresnihan B, Fitzgerald O. Comparison of the accuracy of steroid placement with clinical outcome in patients with shoulder symptoms. Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56:59-63.Sethi PM, Kingston S, El Attrache N. Accuracy of anterior intra-articular injection of the glenohumeral joint. Arthroscopy 2005;21:77-80.Yamakado K, The targeting accuracy of subacromial injection to the shoulder: An arthrographic evaluation. Arthroscopy 2002;18:887-891.Naredo E, Cabero F, Beneyto P, Cruz A, Mondejar B, Uson J, Palop MJ, Crespo M. A randomized comparative study of short term response to blind injection versus sonographic-guided injection of local corticosteroids in patients with painful shoulder. J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):308-14.

@ theshoulderdoc

Ultrasound Guided Injections41 Randomised Blind vs USS guidedNaredo et al.. J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):308-14.

Number of patients with 50% decrease in VAS for pain (VAS 50) and SFA score (SFA 50) at 5 weeks.

@ theshoulderdoc

40 PatientsBlind RCTAbduction range improved more in US Guided groupNo significant difference in PainChen et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006. JanUltrasound Guided Injections

@ theshoulderdoc

My ApproachBlind:InitialQuickSimpleWorks >70%Guided:Failed initialDiagnosticPrevious ASDDone by Radiologist

@ theshoulderdoc

SurgeryWHY?To treat the cause!

WHEN?When there is a surgically treatable causeBut, how do you know???

@ theshoulderdoc

How do you know?Clinical:Positive Passive Neers SignNegative Copelands signNegative Corrective / Modification TestsRadiological:ACJ / Cuff tear / calcific / labral tear, etc.Treatment Response:Positive Response to good SAINegative response to correct rehab.

@ theshoulderdoc

Indications for SurgerySpace occupying lesionCalcific TendonitisACJ osteophytesSecondary Cuff Dysfunction Frozen ShoulderRotator Cuff TearBiceps PathologyInstability}Treat the Cause(Not ASD)

@ theshoulderdoc

Impingement Audit, 201265 patients with SIS over 1 yearSecondary causes excluded on imaging.23% +ve modification tests -> rehab - all recovered77% - SAI:69% positive response to SAI at 6wks90% recovered with rehab by 3months11 patients (17%) = ASD+ve SAI = 100% full recovery-ve SAI = 60% full recoverySelina Sandher, Medical Student

@ theshoulderdoc

Failed ASD Review, 201454 patients with mean age 51yrsTime from ASD to revision = 27m (8-168)Procedures:AC joint Excision 41%Biceps Tenotomy 20% Cuff Repair 19%Capsular Release 7% Microfracture 3%Excision of calcific deposits 2% Anterior Stabilisation 2%Ravi Badge & Emma TorrancePresented at SECEC, 2015

@ theshoulderdoc

SummarySubacromial Impingement does existIt is a collection of symptom & signs Not a pathological diagnosis

Exclude secondary causesPassive / DynamicSymptom Modification tests positive = No Surgery!Surgery = Treat causeThere is a role for ASD alone, but it is not common

@ theshoulderdoc

NHS Commissioning Gude, 2013

@ theshoulderdoc

THANK [email protected]

IMPINGEMENT

@ theshoulderdoc

Neer (1972) Anatomical Rationale for Anterior AcromioplastyTheory: caused by repeated impingement of the rotator cuff and the humeral head with traction of the CA ligamentDissected 100 shoulders and found evidence of mechanical impingement in 11, with acromial spursReported 50 Open Acromioplasty procedures with good results.

@ theshoulderdoc