48
GIT IN HEMODIALYSIS By: Ahmed Eldeep MD

GIT in Hemodialysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PowerPoint Presentation

GIT IN HEMODIALYSISBy: Ahmed EldeepMD

1

AGENDA 1- Common gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms among HD patients.2-Abdominal pain in Dialysis patient.3- Are dialysis patients at an increased risk of GI bleeding? 4- Hemodialysis-associated ascites.

1

Common gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms

The CVS complications like hypotension & arrhythmia were at the top with frequency of 79.3%. The GIT complications like nausea, vomiting abdominal pain followed the CVS complication in decreasing order of frequency. The other major proportion of complications was Hematological complications

1-Nausea and vomitingOccurs in up to 10% of routine dialysis treatments. Etiology The cause is multifactorial.Inadequate dialysis. HypotensionEarly manifestation of disequilibrium syndrome.Dialyzer reactions.Fluid and electrolyte changes during the dialysis treatment.Non-dialysis causes(outside of the dialysis setting) e.g: Hypercalcemia Cerebral causes or GI causes

Prior to the initiation of dialysis, patients may complain of nausea and vomiting. These symptoms usually disappearwith dialysis and removal of uremic toxins.

Etiology. Nausea or vomiting occurs in up to 10% of routine dialysis treatments. The cause is multifactorial.Most episodes in stable patients are probably related to hypotension. Nausea or vomiting also can be an earlymanifestation of the so-called disequilibrium syndrome described in II.A. Both type A and type B varieties ofdialyzer reactions can cause nausea and vomiting. Non-dialysis causes must always be considered when nauseaand vomiting occur outside of the dialysis setting, as discussed in Chapter 34. For example, hypercalcemia maymanifest as (primarily interdialytic) nausea and vomiting, and should be looked for when no other explanation is athand.2. Management. The first step is to treat any associated hypotension. If nausea persists, an antiemetic (seeTable 6-5) can be administered.3. Prevention. Avoidance of hypotension during dialysis is of prime importance. In some patients, reduction ofthe blood flow rate by 30% during the initial hour of dialysis may be of benefit. However, the treatment time mustthen be lengthened accordingly.6

Dyspepsia.

Dyspepsia. Dyspepsia is defined as persistent or recurrent abdominal discomfort centered in the upper abdomen(epigastrium). Dyspepsia and indigestion are terms that are frequently interchangeable. Symptoms may includeepigastric pain or discomfort, bloating, belching, eructations, and flatulence. Dyspepsia may be due to a true GIpathologic process, such as peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastritis, duodenitis, orgastroparesis, as seen in diabetic patients. Alternatively, dyspepsia may be related to medications that dialysispatients are required to take, such as phosphate binders (e.g., calcium carbonate or aluminum salts) or ironsupplements. Evaluation for organic lesion is warranted if the history and physical examination are suggestive of suchlesions. Prokinetic agents, antacids, and histamine H2 receptor antagonists are the most widely used agents in themanagement of dyspepsia. Dosing of these drugs in renal failure is discussed below in Section II.A.3. (prokineticdrugs) and Section II.B.3. (H2-blockers).7

2-Dyspepsia. Persistent or recurrent abdominal discomfort centered in the upper abdomen epigastric pain or discomfort, bloating, belching, eructations, and flatulence. EITIOLOGYTrue GI pathologic process, such as peptic ulcer disease, GERD, gastritis, duodenitis, or gastroparesis. Medications as phosphate binders (e.g., calcium carbonate or aluminum salts) or iron supplements. TTT: Prokinetic agents, antacids, and histamine H2 receptor antagonists.

Dyspepsia. Dyspepsia is defined as persistent or recurrent abdominal discomfort centered in the upper abdomen(epigastrium). Dyspepsia and indigestion are terms that are frequently interchangeable. Symptoms may includeepigastric pain or discomfort, bloating, belching, eructations, and flatulence. Dyspepsia may be due to a true GIpathologic process, such as peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastritis, duodenitis, orgastroparesis, as seen in diabetic patients. Alternatively, dyspepsia may be related to medications that dialysispatients are required to take, such as phosphate binders (e.g., calcium carbonate or aluminum salts) or ironsupplements. Evaluation for organic lesion is warranted if the history and physical examination are suggestive of suchlesions. Prokinetic agents, antacids, and histamine H2 receptor antagonists are the most widely used agents in themanagement of dyspepsia. Dosing of these drugs in renal failure is discussed below in Section II.A.3. (prokineticdrugs) and Section II.B.3. (H2-blockers).8

3-Constipationcommon complaint among dialysis patients. The causes of constipation are multifactorial. Patients' fluid intake is limited. Dietary restriction of high-potassium fruits and vegetables. Medications : calcium- or aluminum-containing phosphate binders and iron supplements. Patient inactivity and underlying medical conditions.

Constipation may result in obstruction, fecal impaction, and even bowel perforation, diverticular disease, as well as hemorrhoids.

Constipation. Constipation is not an uncommon complaint among dialysis patients. The causes of constipationare multifactorial. Patients' fluid intake is limited. Dietary restriction of high-potassium fruits and vegetables decreasesthe fiber content of ingested food. Medications such as calcium- or aluminum-containing phosphate binders and ironsupplements cause constipation. Patient inactivity and underlying medical conditions may contribute to constipation.Narcotics given as an analgesic, such as codeine and meperidine, can cause constipation, as well as mental statuschange in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).Constipation may result in obstipation with obstruction, fecal impaction, and even bowel perforation. Long-termcomplications of constipation are thought to contribute to the etiologic process of diverticular disease, as well ashemorrhoids. In patients treated with peritoneal dialysis, decreased bowel motility can cause dialysate outflowobstruction through the peritoneal catheter.9

Senna lax labImportal sachLactulose Laxel sachEnemax Picolax drops

Management Increase the fiber content in food usually corrects constipation. If constipation persists, the following agents may be used: Emollient: docusate sodium (egycusate) 100 mg PO qd to tid , Stimulant: bisacodyl (Dulcolax) 13 tablets; and senna(senna lax lab purgation).Hyperosmotic: sorbitol ( importal sach )70% 30 mL PO qhs, lactulose 30 mL PO qhs. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate resin plus sorbitol (Kayexalate) has been associated with intestinal necrosis in ESRD patients, either given by enema or by the oral route ( Dardik et al, 2000).

Dietary changes to increase the fiber content in food usually corrects constipation. If constipation persists, thefollowing agents may be used: Emollient: docusate sodium (Colace) 100 mg PO qd to tid prn, casanthranol anddocusate sodium (Peri-Colace) 12 capsules or 12 tablespoons PO qhs prn; Stimulant: bisacodyl (Dulcolax) 13tablets PO qd prn; and Hyperosmotic: sorbitol 70% 30 mL PO qhs, lactulose (Chronulac) 30 mL PO qhs. Sodiumpolystyrene sulfonate resin plus sorbitol (Kayexalate) has been associated with intestinal necrosis in ESRD patients,either given by enema or by the oral route ( Dardik et al, 2000). It is not clear if the sorbitol component alone is equallydangerous. Whereas the combination is still widely used to treat hyperkalemia, use of sorbitol to treat constipation,where there are alternatives available, may not be wise. Soap suds, mineral oil, and tap water enemas or bisacodyl orglycerin suppositories once daily may be used for more immediate results. Colyte or GoLYTELY may be used forbowel preparation for endoscopy or radiology studies despite the high electrolyte content and the large volumeingested.Medicinal fiber in the form of psyllium (Metamucil) should be avoided. Both sodium and potassium are present in thepreparation, and a large volume of liquid is required in preparation. Laxatives containing magnesium, citrate, orphosphate should be avoided (e.g., milk of magnesium, magnesium citrate, and Fleet's products containingphosphate). Magnesium is poorly handled by patients with ESRD. Hypermagnesemia can result in development ofneurologic disorders. Citrate, in general, should be avoided in patients with ESRD because it increases absorption ofaluminum from the GI tract. Hyperphosphatemia from phosphate intake can upset the delicate calcium/phosphorusbalance and contribute to the sequela of secondary hyperparathyroidism.11

Medicinal fiber in the form of psyllium (Regmucil sach) should be avoided. Both sodium and potassium are present in the preparation. and a large volume of liquid is required in preparation.Laxatives containing magnesium, citrate, or phosphate should be avoided (e.g., milk of magnesium, magnesium citrate, and Fleet's products containing phosphate). Magnesium is poorly handled by patients with ESRD.

Hypermagnesemia can result in development of neurologic disorders. (laxel sach- Epico-eff. Sach)Citrate, in general, should be avoided in patients with ESRD because it increases absorption of aluminum from the GI tract.(Mg citrate) Hyperphosphatemia from phosphate intake can upset the delicate calcium/phosphorus balance and contribute to the sequela of secondary hyperparathyroidism.(Enemax- Laxel sach)Mg sulphate )Epsom salt- laxel sach)Na picosulphate (picolax drops)

12

Senna lax labImportal sachLactulose Laxel sachEnemax Picolax drops

4-DiarrheaAn episode of diarrhea.Diarrhea following a period of constipation.An acute episode of bloody diarrhea associated with abdominal pain, fever and signs of sepsis, and hypotension, especially during hemodialysis, may suggest ischemic bowel disorder or bowel infarction.Diarrhea associated with fever suggests an infectious cause.

Persistent diarrhea requires a workup similar to that in patients without ESRD. Suspect autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Endoscopy is required to diagnose inflammatory bowel disorders.

An episode of diarrhea on an occasional (bowel irritability associated with dietary intake or viral GI disorder).Diarrhea following a period of constipation may signal fecal impaction. Treatment is focused on constipation.An acute episode of bloody diarrhea associated with abdominal pain, fever and signs of sepsis, and hypotension,especially during hemodialysis, may suggest ischemic bowel disorder or bowel infarction.( ESRD patients are prone to this disease because of their atherosclerosis-associated risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and Dyslipidemia).Diarrhea associated with fever suggests an infectious cause. Blood and stool specimen for culture and sensitivity arerequired. Clostridium difficile enteritis may occur after prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Oral vancomycin ormetronidazole is used in the treatment of C. difficile enteritis.

Persistent diarrhea requires a workup similar to that in patients without ESRD. Suspect autonomic neuropathy inpatients with diabetes mellitus. Endoscopy is required to diagnose inflammatory bowel disorders.

In noninfectious diarrhea, loperamide hydrochloride (Imodium) or diphenoxylate hydrochloride and atropine sulfate(Lomotil) may be used for temporary relief.

14

2

Abdominal pain in Dialysis patient

Case81-year-old female on hemodialysis C/O: worsening of abdominal pain of 2 days duration. The pain started as a dull ache over the lower abdomen 2 months earlier, diffuse but especially prominent over the lower quadrant, and was unrelieved by analgesic medications. EX.: her whole abdomen was diffusely tender, but the lower quadrant was extremely tender with palpable nodular lesions. Lab: normal amylase and lipase level along with a white cell count of 13.5K/CUMM (3.5- 10.6 K/CUMM), calcium of 10.6 mg/dL (8.2-10.6 mg/dL), phosphorus of 5.9 mg/dL (2.3-5.0 mg/dL) and intact PTH 880 pg/mL (18-86 pg/mL). CT abdomen and pelvis and ultrasound of her abdomen revealed .

Causes of abdominal pain in dialysis patientGIT causes:Upper GI diseases.Lower GI diseases.Hepato-biliary.Pancreatic.Non-GIT causes:

Upper GI diseases: e.g., Gastritis, duodenitis, and peptic ulcer disease.

Lower GI diseases:Diverticulosis and diverticulitisConstipation.Colonic diverticula increased among pt with polycystic kidney disease.B. Spontaneous colonic perforation. diverticular disease, amyloidosis, constipation, post-transplantation immunosuppressive treatment, and infections.C. Discrete colonic ulceration.discrete, nonspecific single ulcers of the cecum or ascending colon. D. Colonic carcinoma.

A. Diverticulosis and diverticulitis. Right-sided diverticular disease is more common in the dialysis population thanin the general population. Constipation due to dietary restriction of fluid, fruits, and vegetables and due to the use ofcertain phosphate binders predisposes dialysis patients to diverticular disease. Colonic diverticula are increasedamong those suffering from polycystic kidney disease. These large diverticula are prone to perforate. Complicationsof diverticulosis include diverticulitis and colonic perforation. Diverticulitis is a relative contraindication for peritonealdialysis. In renal transplant candidates with recurrent diverticulitis, segmental resection of the lesions prior totransplantation may prevent subsequent perforation when high-dose steroid therapy is initiated after renaltransplantation.B. Spontaneous colonic perforation. Spontaneous colonic perforation may be seen in patients with increased risk,such as those with diverticular disease, amyloidosis, constipation, post-transplantation immunosuppressive treatment,and infections. Spontaneous perforation may occur in the absence of an obvious cause or risk factor. A vasculiticpathogenesis has been proposed. When a patient receiving dialysis presents with abdominal pain, considerimpending or actual colonic perforation. If perforation occurs, the mortality rate is extremely high.C. Discrete colonic ulceration. A patient with ESRD who is receiving hemodialysis and who presents withsymptoms similar to those of appendicitis or carcinoma of the colon, or even with rectal bleeding, may have discrete,nonspecific single ulcers of the cecum or ascending colon. The pathogenesis of such lesions is unknown. Treatmentis oriented towards symptoms.D. Intestinal necrosis. Necrosis of the small and large intestines has been reported in renal failure patientsreceiving oral or rectal sodium polystyrene sulfonate in sorbitol. Whether the culprit is the exchange resin or sorbitolis under investigation.E. Colonic carcinoma. With regard to colonic carcinoma, vigilance should be exercised in their detection. At aminimum, the official clinical practice guidelines for their detection in the general population should also apply toESRD patients.20

Hepato-biliary.Chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis are common in dialysis patients. Symptomatic patients can be treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy or traditional cholecystectomy. Asymptomatic patients usually undergo cholecystectomy if they are renal transplant candidates.

Pancreatic.Diagnosis in patients with renal failure is confounded by the observation that serum concentrations of pancreatic amylase and lipase are elevated in patients with ESRD in the absence of acute pancreatitis.The highest levels of amylase and lipase are noted in hemodialysis patients. The absolute values do not exceed three times the upper limit of normal. The degree of elevation is roughly proportional to the degree of renal dysfunction.

Elevated baseline levels of serum amylase. In most dialysis patients, due to the loss of urinary excretion,serum total amylase activity is elevated up to three times the upper limit of normal, even in the absence of clinicalevidence of pancreatitis. The magnitude of elevation is higher in patients with acute renal failure than in chronicdialysis patients. Serum amylase levels may be spuriously low in peritoneal dialysis patients usingicodextrin-containing dialysis solutions ( Schonicke et al, 1999). Serum concentrations of the pancreas-specific P3isoenzyme have been variably reported to be increased or normal in asymptomatic dialysis patients. In fact, P 3values exceeding three times the upper limit of normal are seen in up to 18% of asymptomatic dialysis patients. Incontrast, in the nonuremic population, the P 3 amylase fraction is consistently absent and appears only with acutepancreatitis.2. Question of occult pancreatitis in dialysis patients. Autopsy studies of largely asymptomatic dialysispatients have revealed a high incidence of pancreatic abnormalities, including chronic pancreatitis. The extent towhich persistent elevations of the serum amylase levels are due to decreased catabolism of the enzyme versuspancreatitis is not known.3. Serum and peritoneal fluid amylase levels during pancreatitis in dialysis patients. In a dialysis patientsuspected of having pancreatitis, the finding of a serum total amylase value in excess of three times the upper limitof normal suggests that pancreatitis is present. Unfortunately, very severe pancreatitis can be present in dialysispatients with only slight, and therefore nondiagnostic, elevations in the serum total amylase level. We have foundelevation of the plasma P3 isoenzyme level to be a reliable indicator of pancreatitis in dialysis patients ( Vaziri et al,1988).The peritoneal fluid amylase concentration, easily obtainable in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis, is not asensitive indicator of pancreatitis because the peritoneal fluid amylase levels can be only slightly elevated in thepresence of severe pancreatitis. Nevertheless, an effluent amylase level greater than 100 units per dL issuggestive of pancreatitis or some other intra-abdominal catastrophe ( Caruana et al, 1987; Gupta et al, 1992).B. Lipase1. Elevated baseline serum lipase levels in dialysis patients. Serum lipase activity is elevated (as high astwice the upper limit of normal) in about 50% of dialysis patients. Serum lipase activity rises following hemodialysisdue to (a) heparin-induced increase in lipolytic activity and (b) presumably, ultrafiltration-inducedhemoconcentration. Therefore, predialysis samples should be used for this test.C. Serum22

Non-GIT causes:Metabolic disorder, e.g. hyperlipidemia, porphyria,calciphylaxix.Hematologic disorder, e.g., sickle cell crisis, hemolysis, acute leukemia.Cardio/pulm. disorder, e.g., acute MI, pulmonary embolus, pneumonia, pericarditis.Endocrine disorder, e.g., DKA, pheo, Addisons disease, hyperparathyroidism.Neurologic, e.g., herpes zoster.Toxic, e.g., Drugs, toxins, narcotic withdrawal. Also, heat stroke.

Case81-year-old female on hemodialysis C/O: worsening of abdominal pain of 2 days duration. The pain started as a dull ache over the lower abdomen 2 months earlier, diffuse but especially prominent over the lower quadrant, and was unrelieved by analgesic medications. EX.: her whole abdomen was diffusely tender, but the lower quadrant was extremely tender with palpable nodular lesions. Lab: normal amylase and lipase level along with a white cell count of 13.5K/CUMM (3.5- 10.6 K/CUMM), calcium of 10.6 mg/dL (8.2-10.6 mg/dL), phosphorus of 5.9 mg/dL (2.3-5.0 mg/dL) and intact PTH 880 pg/mL (18-86 pg/mL). CT abdomen and pelvis and ultrasound of her abdomen revealed .

CT abdomen and pelvis without contrast showing multiple soft tissue densities in the anterior abdominal wall (A). Calcification of blood vessels within the abdomen and pelvis was also noted (B).

Ultrasound of abdomen revealing subcutaneous nodule.

Both these findings in the setting of end stage renal disease were consistent with calciphylaxis, a rare, and often fatal, complication. Although ulceration is considered a hallmark of calciphylaxis, it can also present as non-ulcerative nodular lesions, as in our patient. (Fine et al.,2002).

With the above treatment, she had significant improvement of symptoms. Our case highlights the need for emergency physicians to be cognizant of this life-threatening complication in end stage renal disease patients and of the fact that calciphylaxis has different modes of presentation, among which is acute abdominal pain. 27

3

Are dialysis patients at an increased risk of GI bleeding?

Upper GI bleeding

Etiology Angiodysplasia of the stomach or duodenum (24%), Erosive gastritis (18%), Duodenal ulcer (17%), Erosive esophagitis (17%),Gastric ulcer (12%), MalloryWeiss (8%), and Erosive duodenitis (3%).Zuckerman et al (1985),

1. Incidence and etiology. According to one study, the sources of upper GI bleeding are gastritis (38%),duodenal ulcer (24%), duodenitis (14%), gastric ulcer (9.5%), esophageal varices (9.5%), and MalloryWeiss tear(5%). Proposed mechanisms for upper GI hemorrhage with chronic renal failure include disturbances in serumgastrin, in gastric acid secretion, in the mucosal barrier, and in the clotting process; the use of ulcerogenic drugs,such as anti-inflammatory drugs that inhibit prostaglandin synthesis (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, orNSAIDs, and aspirin); and infection associated with H. pylori.However, in another study by Zuckerman et al (1985), angiodysplasia was the most common source of upper GIbleeding, as well as recurrent bleeding in the patients with renal failure. Causes for upper GI bleeding in patientswith chronic renal failure are as follows: angiodysplasia of the stomach or duodenum (24%), erosive gastritis(18%), duodenal ulcer (17%), erosive esophagitis (17%), gastric ulcer (12%), MalloryWeiss (8%), and erosiveduodenitis (3%). It is possible that angiodysplastic lesions in both the upper and lower tract in these patients areno more common than in the general population. However, they are discovered more frequently because of theirgreater tendency to bleed. It has been suggested that renal failure plays a role in the pathogenesis of theselesions. One theory states that functional failure of the precapillary sphincter due to volume overload andsubmucosal venous obstruction leads to vascular ectasia. Another theory states that a low blood flow state duringdialysis followed by reactive hyperemia results in eventual angiodysplasia. Finally, others suggest that potassiumor gastrin, agents known to reduce precapillary arteriolar tone, have a causative role in the development of theselesions. Angiodysplastic lesions in patients with chronic renal failure are more likely to bleed30

upper GI (n=34), lower GI (n=14), and unknown (n=4).

Duodenal ulcer (26%) and gastric antral vascular ectasia (26%), followed by gastric ulcer (14%).

*lower GI: colorectal cancer, angiodysplasia and ischemic enteritis were identified in equal numbers (21%).

upper GI (n=34), lower GI (n=14), and unknown (n=4). Duodenal ulcer (26%)and gastric antral vascular ectasia (26%) were the most frequently identified causesof upper GI bleeding, followed by gastric ulcer (14%). In patients with lower GIbleeding, colorectal cancer, angiodysplasia and ischemic enteritis were identified inequal numbers (21%).31

The aim of this study was to examine the risk of UGIB among the dialysis patients during a 6-year period following their initiation of hemodialysis (HD) therapy in Taiwan- a country with the highest incidence of ESRD in the world, using general population as an external comparison group.

The incidence rate of UGIB (42.01 per 1000 person-year) was significantly higher in the HD cohort than inthe control cohort (27.39 per 1000 person-years). After adjusting for potential confounders, the adjusted hazardratios for UGIB during the 6-year follow-up periods for HD patients was 1.27 (95% CI=1.03-1.57) compared topatients in the comparison cohort.33

Proposed mechanisms for UGI Hge. with CRF include disturbances in :Serum gastrin, in Gastric acid secretion, Mucosal barrier, Clotting process,Use of ulcerogenic drugs(NSAIDs, and aspirin); and Infection associated with H. pylori.

Diagnosis. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)

Management. As nonuremic patients. ( nasogastric aspiration, transfusion, H2 blockers or pump inhibitor and antacids).H2 blockers include Cemetidine ,ranitidine , famotidine, and nizatidine . All of these drugs are partially excreted renally, and their usual dosage should be reduced by at least 50% in CRF. For nizatidine, the recommendation is to give 150 mg every other day (versus the usual 150 mg twice a day dosing in nonuremic patients).Proton pump inhibitor - Dosing is unchanged in renal insufficiency.

35

Conclusions: Use of PPIs in patients dialyzed using a dialysate [Mg] of 0.75-1.0 mEq/l is associated with hypomagnesemia. We suggest monitoring plasma [Mg] in patients taking PPIs, with discontinuation of the medication if possible and/or adjustment of dialysate [Mg] to normalize plasma [Mg].

Serum magnesium levels are lower in PPI use. In the inammatory statelow serum magnesium level is a signicant predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients.

AbstractIntroduction This study aimed to evaluate the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI)use and serum magnesium levels, and the role of hypomagnesemia and PPI use as a risk factor formortality in hemodialysis patients. Methods An observational study, including a cross-sectionaland 1-year retrospective cohort study. The study comprised 399 hemodialysis patients at a singlecenter, and was conducted from January to September 2014. Multiple linear regression analysiswas used to investigate the independent relationship between serum magnesium levels and base-line demographic and clinical variables, including PPI and histamine-2 receptor antagonist use. Coxregression model was used to identify lower serum magnesium level and PPI as a predictor of1-year mortality. Findings Serum magnesium levels were lower with PPI use than non-PPI use(2.39 6 0.36 vs. 2.56 6 0.39 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that PPIuse, low serum albumin levels, and low serum potassium and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP) levels were signicantly associated with low serum magnesium levels. A total of 29deaths occurred during the follow-up period. According to Cox regression analysis stratied by hs-CRP, only high serum hs-CRP levels (>4.04 mg/L) in association with low serum magnesium levelswas an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.536.40,P < 0.001). Discussion Serum magnesium levels are lower in PPI use. In the inammatory state, alow serum magnesium level is a signicant predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients.

37

Antacids containing aluminum and magnesium hydroxide should be avoided in dialysis patients to avoid aluminum toxicity and hypermagnesemia. Sucralfate is a sulfated polysaccharide,, complexed with aluminum hydroxide. Sucralfate should not be used in dialysis patients because of the risk of intestinal aluminum absorption ( Robertson et al, 1989 ).Risk factors for ulcer formation (NSAIDs and aspirin ingestion, smoking, etc.) should be eliminated if possible.

Angiodysplasia.

4

Hemodialysis-associated ascites

CaseA 53-year-old male, ESRD secondary to type2 DM on maintenance HD for 2Y presented with ascites of six months duration. He was on twice-weekly HD with target wt of 6870 kg, which progressively reduced since the last two months. Examination: BP: 130/80 mm Hg, he had moderate to massive ascites and no palpable abdominal organomegaly. Investigations : Hb of 8.6 g/dL, bl. urea of 84 mg/ dL, s cr. of 7.4 mg/dL, s. ca. of 8.7 mg/dL and s. phosphorus of 3.9 mg/dL. His URR on dialysis was 56%.Ascitic fluid analysis revealed an exudate with protein of 5.4 g/dL, albumin of 2.3 g/dL, LDH of 145 U/L and cell count of 250, 95% of which were lymphocytes. Serum albumin was low at 2.7 g/dL, with SAAG of