Upload
lionel-chew
View
769
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Hospital Nutritional Care and
Protected Mealtimes
Dr Mary Hickson
Therapy Research Lead, Imperial College
Healthcare NHS Trust
&
Honorary Senior Lecturer, Imperial College
London
Hospital population • 63% of 65-74 year olds and 72% of people
aged over 75 years report a long-standing
illness
• Almost two thirds of general and acute
hospital beds are used by people aged over
65 years
• People over 75 years have on average
significantly longer hospital stays
2002 data
Who are Elderly?
UK National Statistics, 2009
Prevalence of malnutrition
• 3 million at risk of malnutrition in the UK
• 93% live in the community
Malaysia:
• Children
• Elderly – rural and care home populations
• Increasing problems with obesity in adults
Prevalence of malnutrition
Increased risk in hospital
Malnourished people have:
Costs: £13 billion / year (UK)
Also:
Mortality
OR:
1.6-1.9
Functional
Decline
OR:2.2-2.8
Pressure
Ulcers
OR: 1.9-2.6
Infections
OR: 1.5
Change in malnutrition risk
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Not at risk Moderate Risk High Risk
%week 1
week 2-3
Nematy et al. JHND
2006; 19(3): p209-18.
BMI on admission
• Mean age 85.3yrs (sd=1.5)
• Significantly lower mean BMI than UK elderly
population
• 22kg/m2 v 27kg/m2
• 36% had BMI <20kg/m2
• 72% had a BMI <24kg/m2
Energy deficit
9 month follow up
• Mortality
• 9 deaths
• 7 from high risk of malnutrition group
• 1 moderate risk
• 1 not at risk
Poor food intake
3083 3230
5040
6115
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
B D E Normal
Diet Category
En
erg
y i
nta
ke (
KJ)
Wright et al, (2005) J Hum Nutr Diet 18(3) 213–219
General Hospital Patients
• Daily meals provided 2007+/-479 kcal and 78+/-21 g of protein and exceeded patients' minimum needs by 41% and 15%, respectively.
• 975/1416 (69%) patients did not eat enough.
• The food intake of 572/975 (59%) underfed patients was not predominantly affected by disease but other factors.
Dupertuis et al 2003
Factors associated with
inadequate energy intake (multivariate analysis)
• poor appetite
• higher BMI
• diagnosis of infection or cancer,
• delirium
• need for assistance with feeding. Mudge AM et al. Helping understand nutritional gaps in the elderly (HUNGER):
A prospective study of patient factors associated with inadequate nutritional
intake in older medical inpatients. Clin Nutr. 2011 Jan 22; 30(3):320-5.
Hospital Malnutrition cycle
http://na.adapocketguide.com/vault/editor/Image/NCP-1.3.2.1grey1.gif
What is the best way to screen?
71 tools in the literature (Green & Watson
2005)
• Only some are validated
• Only any good if used routinely
• Only any good if the results are followed
through
Recommended tools
• ESPEN
–NRS 2002 (hospital use)
–MUST (community)
–MNA (elderly – NH / RC etc)
• BAPEN
–MUST (all areas)
Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) Table 1: Initial screening Ye
s
No
1 Is BMI <20?
2 Has the patient lost weight within the last 3 months?
3 Has the patient had a reduced dietary intake in the last week?
4 Is the patient severely ill ? (e.g. in intensive therapy)
Yes: If the answer is 'Yes' to any question, the screening in Table 2 is
performed.
No: If the answer is 'No' to all questions, the patient is re-screening at
weekly intervals. If the patient e.g. is scheduled for a major operation, a
preventive nutritional care plan is considered to avoid the associated
risk status.
Table 2: Final screening Impaired nutritional status Severity of disease ( increase in requirements)
Absent
Score 0
Normal nutritional status Absent
Score 0
Normal nutritional requirements
Mild
Score 1
Wt loss >5% in 3 mths
or
Food intake below 50-75% of normal
requirement in preceding week.
Mild
Score 1
Hip fracture*
Chronic patients, in particular with acute
complications: cirrhosis*, COPD*.
Chronic hemodialysis, diabetes, oncology.
Moderate
Score 2
Wt loss >5% in 2 mths
or
BMI 18.5 - 20.5 + impaired general
condition
or
Food intake 25-50% of normal
requirement in preceding week
Moderate
Score 2
Major abdominal surgery*
Stroke*
Severe pneumonia, hematologic
malignancy.
Severe
Score 3
Wt loss >5% in 1 mth (>15% in 3
mths)
or
BMI <18.5 + impaired general
condition
or
Food intake 0-25% of normal
requirement in preceding week in
preceding week.
Severe
Score 3
Head injury*
Bone marrow transplantation*
Intensive care patients (APACHE>10).
Score: + Score: = Total score:
Age: if 70 years: add 1 to total score above = age-adjusted total score:
Score 3: the patient is nutritionally at-risk and a nutritional care plan is initiated
Score < 3: weekly rescreening of the patient. If the patient e.g. is scheduled for a major operation, a
preventive nutritional care plan is considered to avoid the associated risk status.
http://na.adapocketguide.com/vault/editor/Image/NCP-1.3.2.1grey1.gif
Taste and
Smell
Teeth and
oral health
Medical
conditions
Social
Factors
Psychological
factors
Appetite and
thirst
What prevents good intake?
Taste and smell First taste of puree:
Young 80%
Old 33%
Young 63%
Old 7%
Schiffman SS (1997) JAMA 278,
(16) 1357-1362.
Roberts et al (1994) jama 272(20) 1601-1606
Underfeeding Ad libitum
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
underfeedinghunger score
underfeedingsatiety score
ad lib HS Ad lib SS
young
old
Moriguti et al. (2000) J Gastroent Biol Sci, 55A, 12, B580-587
Re-nutrition Research suggests it is more difficult to treat
malnutrition in the elderly than in the young.
Hebuterne X, et al (1997) Clinical Nutrition 16, 283-289.
http://na.adapocketguide.com/vault/editor/Image/NCP-1.3.2.1grey1.gif
Nutritional supplements
• Reduced mortality: RR = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.64-
0.97) (undernourished only)
• Weight gain: 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.5%)
• Risk of complications reduced: RR=0.86
(95% CI 0.75-0.99)
• But no difference in LoS: -0.8days
(95% CI: -2.8d - 1.3d)
• No functional benefits Milne AC, 2009, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003288.
• Groups most likely to benefit from supplements are:
– Over 75yrs
– Unwell
– Hospitalised
– Given an addition 400kcal+ / day
• Compliance seems to be good in many studies but
this may be ‘trial effect’
• Worse in older adults in hospital
Milne AC, 2009, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003288.
Supplement use
• UK NICE Guidance
• Healthcare professionals should consider oral nutrition support to improve nutritional intake for people who can swallow safely and are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. [A]
Timing of supplements
• Give between meals
• >1 hour before the next
meal.
• Supplements with
meals adversely affects
intake
Wilson M-M.G. et al. (2002) Effect of liquid dietary supplements
on energy intake in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr. 75 p944-7.
High energy and protein meals
• Improve energy and protein intake
• Some evidence for weight gain
• No evidence for functional gains
• BUT
• Weak study designs
• Many fewer studies
Hospital related factors
• Systems fail
• Inflexible food service
• Lack of food choices
• Quality and presentation of food
• Eating environment
• Lack of clear responsibility for food
• Low priority placed on food and eating in
hospital
http://na.adapocketguide.com/vault/editor/Image/NCP-1.3.2.1grey1.gif
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
South Eastern Southern Western Nordic CCEE total
proportion of units screening Schindler et al. How
nutritional risk is
assessed and
managed in
European
hospitals: A
survey of 21,007
patients findings
from the 2007–
2008 cross-
sectional
nutritionDay
survey
Volume 29, Issue 5,
October 2010,
Pages 552–559
What are screening rates in
your hospital or wards?
http://na.adapocketguide.com/vault/editor/Image/NCP-1.3.2.1grey1.gif
How are patients at risk of
malnutrition cared for in your
hospital or wards?
Nutritional care
• Nutritional care processes not well
implemented
• Limited studies with objective data
• Inappropriate nutritional intervention
• Inadequate mealtime assistance
• Hospital mealtime environment
• Inadequate monitoring
Nutrition care processes
O’Flynn 2005 Clin Nutr
Nutrition Assistants • Duncan et al, (2006) Age Ageing, 35, 148-153
• Dietetic assistants in orthopaedic ward increased energy intake and decreased mortality.
• Hickson et al (2004) Clin Nutr, 23, 69-77.
• Healthcare assistants showed no benefit – but this was not targeted care.
• Lassen et al (2008) BMC Hlth Serv Res. 8, 168
• Trained healthcare assistants – showed reduced food wastage
Volunteers
• Wright et al (2008) J Hum Nutr Diet, 12, 555-562
• Volunteers to help dysphagic patients increased energy intake.
• Robinson et al (2002) Geriatr Nurs. 23, 332-5.
• Trained volunteers, Higher meal intake as % of food served
• Walton et al (2008) Appetite 51, 244-8
• Increased energy and protein at lunch but only daily protein increased
• Wong et al (2008) J Nutr, Hlth Aging 12, 309-12
• Volunteers to help semi-dependent patients, intake improved at lunch and weight increased
Assistance
• Mixed results
• Positive effects
• Well accepted
• But could reduce care provided by routine
staff
• Needs to be in context of improved
nutrition care environment and assignment
of responsibility
Mealtime environment
• Improve the environment
• Reduce interruptions
• Focus on eating
• Protected mealtimes
• Family style dining
• Ward dining room
Does protected mealtimes work? • Limited data
• Lack of evidence of implementation
• 1 study showed increased energy intake and
reduced interruptions
• Latest study: Modest increases in the
proportion of elderly patients meeting their
daily energy and protein requirements.
Similar in both PM and assistants groups.
Young AM et al. Clin Nutr. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
Dining room to increase intake
L. Wright, M. Hickson & G. Frost (2006) Eating together is important: using a dining
room in an acute elderly medical ward increases energy intake. J Hum Nutr Dietet,
19, pp. 23–26
Take home messages
• Hospital is a challenging environment to
support nutritional intake
• Screening is important but useless without
implementation of care plans
• Supplements work
• Assistance, improved environment, &
dinning rooms have a small effect