49
Kyle P. Edmonds, MD St. Joseph’s Hospital & Medical Center PGY-3, Department of Family Medicine 2012 Fellow, Institute for Palliative Medicine San Diego Hospice Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting: Office-based practices that impact care at the end of life An Arizona Bioethics Network Webinar

‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

An Arizona Bioethics Network Webinar on physician-office-based practices that impact care at the end of life.

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Kyle P. Edmonds, MD

St. Joseph’s Hospital & Medical CenterPGY-3, Department of Family Medicine

∞2012 Fellow, Institute for Palliative Medicine

San Diego Hospice

‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting:

Office-based practices that impact care at the end of life

An Arizona Bioethics Network Webinar

Page 2: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Identify two patient goals for end-of-life care and how these goals are impacted by the prognostic window.

• Discuss the interaction between cost and perceived quality in EOL care.

• List one patient factor and one system factor that impacts location of death

• Identify one benefit of hospice care for patients.

Objectives

Page 3: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

“And if I got turned loose among a bunch of doctors, who knows what would happen?”

Quill, 2000.

Page 4: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Measures of satisfaction at EOL:• Communication• Pain control & symptom management• Practical support• Enhanced caregiving• Spiritual support• Continuity• Coordination of care

Patient Goals: Metrics

Lorenz et al., 2004.

Page 5: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Permanent coma “worse than death”:

Patient Goals: Shifting Reference Points

Kass-Bartelmes et al., 2010.

Page 6: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Dementia “worse than death”:

Patient Goals: Expect the Unexpected

Kass-Bartelmes et al., 2010.

Page 7: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Attributes on which patients and physicians differ:

1. Be mentally aware

2. Be at peace with God

3. Not a burden to family

4. Be able to help others

5. Pray

6. Have funeral arrangements planned

7. Not be a burden to society

8. Feel one’s life is complete

Patient Goals: Points of Departure

Steinhauser et al., 2000.

Page 8: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Patient Goals: Require Time

Steinhauser et al., 2000.

Page 9: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

The prevailing tendency to avoid discussing the financial ramifications of illness and medical care is not necessarily the preferable approach; it diminishes the patient’s chances of shaping the end of life in a way

that is most compatible with their values and life plans.

Donley & Danis, 2011.

Page 10: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

End-of-Life Cost Determinants

Cost

Patient/LOA Preference

Physician Counselin

g

Family Preference

Availability of Legal

Documents

Organizational Determinants

Private/Public Payment Models

Life Expectanc

y

Opportunity Cost

Caregiver Direct & Indirect Costs

Patient Expenditures

& Lost Productivity

Page 11: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• $26,000/Medicare Beneficiary in last year of life1

• Costs in last 6 months• 27% of the Medicare

budget2

• 70% of costs spent for inpatient care3

• 1/3 of expenditures during last month of life4

EOL Cost Determinants: Overall

1. Raphael et al., 2001. 2. Lubitz, 1993. 3. Fassbender, 2009. 4. Zhang et al., 2009.

Page 12: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Acute life-sustaining care during the final 30 days of life account for 70% of costs in the final year of life.

Zhang et al., 2009.

Page 13: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Of those greater than 65 years old:•Men live 6 of last 15 years with disability•Women live 8 of last 19 years with disability

EOL Cost Determinants: Patient

Raphael et al., 2001.

Page 14: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Predictive of increased costs• Degree of patient anxiety• Degree of family anxiety• Proximity of death• Extreme dependence• Younger age

EOL Cost Determinants: Patient

Tibi-Levy et al., 2006.

Page 15: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Hospital Cost Sources• 62% staff• 23% logistical• 5% overhead• 5% medications• 1% disposable

devices• 1% diagnostic tests

Hospital Death: $17.6B

Medicare: $10B

Private: $3.6B

Medicaid: $2.2B

Uninsured:

$0.59B

EOL Cost Determinants: Hospital

Simoens et al., 2010.

Page 16: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Diagnoses ending in death

1. Sepsis (17% death rate)

2. Respiratory failure (17% death rate)

3. Aspiration Pneumonia (13% death rate)

EOL Cost Determinants: Hospital

Zhao & Encinosa, 2009.

Page 17: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Average caregiver: 49-year-old woman working full-time and dedicating 20hrs/week to care for

her mother for >5 years.1

$196 billio

n

1999

$450 billio

n

2009

More than total 2009 Medicaid

payouts!

EOL Cost Determinants: Opportunity

1. Feinberg et al. 2011; 2. Fassbender, 2009.

Page 18: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Patients with cancer• 19% depleted savings• 21% unable to pay for basic necessities• 9% had declared bankruptcy

• Families of patients with serious illness • 31% spent all or most of personal savings

EOL Cost and Personal Finances

Donley & Danis, 2011.

Page 19: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

EOL Cost and Patient Satisfaction

Zhang et al., 2009.

Page 20: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

…the improvements in medical technologies increase the difficulty of finding a bright line between living and

dying.

Callahan, 2011.

Page 21: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

The Line Between Living and Dying

Kelley et al., 2010.

Page 22: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Organizational determinants of intensity of EOL care• High bed capacity• Increased market competition• Increased percentage of African American patients**

The Line Between Living and Dying

Lin et al., 2009.

Page 23: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

The Line Between Living and Dying

Gomes & Higginson, 2006.

Page 24: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

People caught in the gravity of approaching death encounter a profound distortion of how time is

experienced and valued. Each moment becomes increasingly precious as death draws near…time offers the possibility for final words, a last embrace, finding spiritual peace and, occasionally, even reconciliation.

Chochinov, 2011.

Page 25: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

The Line Between Living and Dying

Fassbender, 2009.

Page 26: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Caregivers of those who received any aggressive care at EOL:•More Major Depressive Disorder•More feelings of regret• Greater feelings of unpreparedness (for the death)•Worse Quality of Life scores

The Line Between Living & Dying

Wright et al.,2008.

Page 27: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

The Line Between Living & Dying

Wright et al.,2008.

Page 28: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Barriers to more widespread end-of-life support in primary and specialty care settings include limited time and resources, discomfort with the topic and

reluctance to give up hope of recovery.

Hamlet et al., 2010.

Page 29: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Taking Action in the Office: Timing

Quill, 2000.

Page 30: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Taking Action in the Office: Timing

Smith et al., 2011.

Page 31: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

•What makes life most worth living for you?•Would there be any circumstances under which you would find life not worth living?•What do you consider your quality of life to be like now?• Have you seen or been with someone who had a particularly good death or particularly difficult death?

Taking Action in the Office: History

Quill, 2000.

Page 32: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Taking Action in the Office: History

Quill, 2000.

Page 33: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Following EOL discussion with physician:• No increase in mood disorders!•More likely to accept terminal status (53% vs. 29%)

•More likely to have completed Do Not Resuscitate (63% vs. 29%)

• Less likely to be admitted to ICU (4.1% vs. 12.4%)

Taking Action in the Office: History

Wright et al., 2008.

Page 34: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Advance directives• Medical Power of Attorney• Living will• (Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment)• (Portable DNR/AND Orders)

Taking Action in the Office: Documents

See: SJHMC Policy #27053.

Page 35: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• 90% have heard of a living will

• 71% have thought about their EOL preferences

• 29% have a living will (up from 12% in 1990)

Taking Action in the Office: Documents

Pew Research Center, 2006. Morse et al., 2011.

Page 36: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

“Use this Living Will form to make decisions now

about your medical care if you are ever in a

terminal condition, a persistent vegetative state or an irreversible coma. You should talk to your doctor about what

these terms mean.”

Taking Action in the Office: Documents

State of Az Living Will Form, Accessed 2011.

Page 37: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

The majority of family caregivers said that they were aware of aforementioned wishes of the patient that could be applied to the [vegetative state] condition, but did not base their decisions primarily on these wishes. They gave three reasons for this: (a) the

expectation of clinical improvement, (b) the caregivers’ definition of life-sustaining treatments

and (c) the moral obligation not to harm the patient.

Kuehlmeyer et al.., 2012.

Page 38: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

engagewithgrace.org The One Slide Project

1. On a scale of 1 to 5, where do you fall on this continuum?

2. If there were a choice, would you prefer to die at home, or in a hospital?3. Could a loved one correctly describe how you’d like to be treated in the

case of a terminal illness?4. Is there someone you trust whom you’ve appointed to advocate on your

behalf when the time is near?5. Have you completed any of the following: written a living will, appointed a

healthcare power of attorney, or completed an advanced directive?

Can You and Your Loved Ones Answer These Questions?

1 2 3 4 5

Don't give up on me no matter what, try any proven and unproven intervention

possible

Let me die without medical intervention

Page 39: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

Taking Action in the Office: Prognosis

Selby et al. 2011

Page 40: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Early Pall Med involvement with NSCLC patients:• Better quality of life• Fewer depressive symptoms• Less aggressive care• Longer survival (11.6 months vs. 8.9 months)

Taking Action in the Office: Palliative Care

Temel et al., 2010.

Page 41: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

…patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer should be offered concurrent palliative care and

standard oncologic care at initial diagnosis…substantial evidence demonstrates that palliative

care—when combined with standard cancer care or as the main focus of care—leads to better patient

and caregiver outcomes.

Smith et.al., 2012.

Page 42: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Enrolled patients:• Increased quality of life• Decreased symptom burden• Decreased odds of dying in hospital• Greater feelings of closure

Taking Action in the Office: Hospice

Taylor, 2009.

Page 43: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

 …the individual, however sick, remained a person whose voice deserved to be heard.

Millenson, 2011.

Page 44: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

• Patients want to die comfortably at home, without conflict, with dignity.

• EOL is costly to patients, families and the system; patients want to know.

• Providers need to be taking a values history.

• The most important aspect of end-of-life care is anticipation.

• The greatest gift we can give patient’s is the gift of time.

Conclusion

Page 45: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

For a full solution, good care for the dying now needs to be seen as a problem that needs a parallel public and professional discussion at what I will loosely call the philosophical level. Two basic questions need to be put on the table. One of them is what we take to be the place of death in human life, and the other, that of the place of death in medicine and health

care.

Callahan, 2011.

Page 46: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

1. Abadir PM, Finucane TE & MK McNabney (2011). When doctors and daughters disagree: Twenty-two days and two blinks of and eye. J Amer Geri Soc. 59: 2337-2340.

2. Baily MA (2011). Futility, autonomy and cost in end-of-life care. J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 172-182.3. Barnato, AE, Chang CH, Farrell MH, Lave JR, Roberts MS & DC Angus (2010). Is survival better at

hospitals with higher “end-of-life” treatment intensity? Med Care. 48(2): 125-132.4. Behl D & Jatoi A (2010). What do oncologists say about chemotherapy at the very end of life? Results

from a semiquantitiative study. J Pall Med 13(7): 831-835.5. Callahan D (2011). End-of-life care: A philosophical or management problem? J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2):

114-120.6. Chochinov HM (2011). Death, time and the theory of relativity. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. In Press. Accessed:

July 5, 2011. 7. Covinsky KE, Pierluissi E & CB Johnson (2011). Clinician’s corner: Hospitalization-associated debility.

JAMA 306(16): 1782-1793.8. Donley G & M Danis (2011). Making the case for talking to patients about the costs of end-of-life care. J

Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 183-193.9. Dunn A & E Litrivis (2011). Aligning patient preferences and patient care at the end of life. Soc Gen Int

Med. 26(7): 681-682.10. Fassbender , Konrad, Robin L. Fainsinger, Mary Carson & Barry A. Finegan (2009). Cost trajectories at the

end of life: The Canadian experience. J Pain Symptom Mgmt. 38(1): 75-80.11. Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A & R Choula (2011). Valuing the invaluable: 2011 update: The growing

contributions and costs of family caregiving. Insight on the Issues. AARP Public Policy Update. 12. Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. American Association of Retired People. Valuing the

invaluable: 2011 update: The growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. Washington DC: AARP Public Policy Instutite, 2011.

13. Finucane TE, Christmas C, Travis K. Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: A review of the evidence. JAMA 1999;282:1365–1370.

14. Fleck, LM (20110. Just caring: Health care rationing, terminal illness and the medically least well off. J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 156-171.

15. FTI Consulting (2011). Living well at the end of life poll. National Journal & The Regence Foundation. 16. Gillick MR. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. N Engl J Med

2000;342:206–210.17. Gomes B & IJ Higginson (2006). Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer:

Systematic review. BMJ. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.38740.614954.55.18. Gomes B, McCrone P, Hall S, Koffman J & Higginson IJ (2010). Variations in the quality and costs of end-

of-life care, preferences and palliative outcomes for cancer patients by place of death: the QUALYCARE study. BMC Cancer. 10: 400-410.

19. Goodman DC, Esty AR, Fisher ES & Chang C (2011). Trends and variations in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries with severe chronic illness. Dartmouth, NC. Dartmouth Institute for Health Care Policy & Clinical Practice. The Dartmouth Atlas Project.

References

Page 47: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

20. Graf, Jürgen & Jörg Wagner, Carmen Graf, Karl-Christian Koch, Uwe Janssens (2005). Five-year survival, quality of life, and individual costs of 303 consecutive medical intensive care patients—A cost utility analysis. Crit Care Med. 33(3): 547-555.

21. Guest JF, Ruiz FJ, Greener MJ, Trotman IF. Palliative care treatment patterns and associated costs of healthcare resource use for specific advanced cancer patients in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2006;15(1): 65-73.

22. Hamlet KS, Adam Hobgood, Guy Brent Hamar, Angela C. Dobbs, Elizabeth Y. Rula, James E. Pope (2010). Impact of predictive model-directed end-of-life counseling for Medicare beneficiaries. Amer J Managed Care 16(5): 379-384.

23. Hawryluck L, Bouali R & Meth ND (2011). Multi-professional recommendations for access and utilization of critical care services: Towards consistency in practice and ethical decision-making processes. J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 254-262.

24. Kass-Bartelmes BL, Hughes R, Rutherford MK. Advance care planning: preferences for care at the end of life. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003. Research in Action Issue #12. AHRQ Pub No. 03-0018.

25. Kuehlmeyer K, Borasio GD & RJ Jox (2012). How family caregivers’ medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: a qualitative interview study. J Med Ethics. Published online ahead of print.

26. Kelley, AS, Morrison RS, Wnger NS, Ettner SL & CA Sarkasian (2010). Determinants of treatment intensity for patients with serious illness: A new conceptual framework. J Pall Med. 13(7): 807-813.

27. Koch T (2011). Care, Compassion or Cost: Redefining the basis of treatment in ethics and law. J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 130-139.

28. Lantos JD & Meadow WL (2011). Costs and end-of-life care in the NICU: Lessons for the MICU? J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 194-200.

29. Lin CY, Max H. Farrell, Judith R. Lave, PhD, Derek C. Angus & Amber E. Barnato (2009). Organizational determinants of hospital end-of-life intensity. Med Care. 47(5): 524-230.

30. Loertscher, Laura, Darcy A. Reed, Michael P. Bannon, and Paul S. Mueller. "Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Do-no-resuscitate Orders: A Guide for Clinicians." American Journal of Medicine 123 (2010): 4-9. Print.

31. Lorenz K, Lynn J, Morton SC, Dy S, Mularski R, Shugarman L, Sun V, Wilkinson A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG. End-of-Life Care and Outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 110. (Prepared by the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center, under Contract No. 290-02-0003.) AHRQ Publication No. 05 E004-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. December 2004.

32. Lorenz K, Lynn J. End-of-life care and outcomes. Rockville, IN: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004.

33. Lubitz JD, Riley GF (1993). Trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life. N Engl J Med. 328(15): 1092-1096.

34. McCrone, Paul (2009). Capturing the costs of end-of-life care: Comparisons of multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and dementia. J Pain Symptom Mgmt. 38(1): 62-67.

35. Menzel PT (2011). The value of life at the end of life: A critical assessment of hope and other factors. J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 215-223. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Report. The MetLife juggling act study: Balancing caregiving and work with the costs involved. Westport, CN: MetLife Mature Market Institute, 1999.

References

Page 48: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

36. Millenson ML (2011). Spock, feminists, and the fight for participatory medicine: a history. J Participat Med. 3:e27.

37. Morrison RS, Penrod JD, Cassel JB, et al. Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168(16):1783-1790.

38. Nicholas LH, Langa KM, Iwashyna TJ & DR Weir (2011). Regional variation in the association between advance directives and end-of-life Medicare expenditures. J Am Med Assn. 306(13): 1447-1453.

39. Paasche-Orlow M (2011). Clinical crossroads: Caring for patients with limited health literacy. J Am Med Assn. 306(10): 11221128.

40. Pew Research Center (2006). More Americans discussing – and planning – end-of-life treatment. Accessed 11/25/2011.

41. Pope TM, Arnold RM & Barnato AE (2011). Caring for the seriously ill: Cost and public policy. J Law, Med & Ethics. 39(2): 111-113.

42. Prigerson, HG (1992). Socialization to dying: Social determinants of death acknowledgement and treatment among terminally ill geriatric patients. J Health & Soc Behav. 33: 378-395.

43. Quill T (2000). Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: Addressing the elephant in the room. JAMA. 284(19): 2502-2507.

44. Raphael C, Ahrens J, Fowler N (2001). Financing end-of-life care in the USA. J Royal Soc Med. 94: 458-461.45. Riley GF, Lubitz JD. Long-term trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life. Health Serv

Res. 2010;45(2):565-576.46. Selby D, Chakraborty A, Lilien T, Stacey E, Zhang L & J Myers (2011). Clinician accuracy when estimating

survival duration: The role of the patient’s performance status and time-based prognostic categories. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 42(4): 578-588.

47. Sessums LL, Zembrzuska H & JL Jackson (2011). Clinician’s corner: Does this patient have medical decision making capacity? J Am Med Assn. 306(4): 420-427.

48. Silveira MJ, DiPiero A, Gerrity MS & C Feudtner (2000). Patients’ knowledge of options at the end of life: Ignorance in the face of death. JAMA. 284(19): 2483-2488.

49. Simoens S, Betty Kutten, Emmanuel Keirse, Paul Vanden Berghe, Claire Beguin, Marianne Desmedt, Myriam Deveugele, Christian Leonard, Dominique Paulus & Johan Menten (2010). The costs of treating terminal patients. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 40(3): 436-448.

50. Simoens S, Betty Kutten, Emmanuel Keirse, Paul Vanden Berghe, Claire Beguin, Marianne Desmedt, Myriam Deveugele, Christian Leonard, Dominique Paulus & Johan Menten (2010). Cost of terminal patients who receive palliative care or usual care in different hospital wards. J Pall Med. 13(11): 1365-1369.

51. Smith AK, Williams BA & B Lo (2011). Discussing overall prognosis with the very elderly. NEJM. 365(23): 2149-2151.

52. Smith TJ, Temin S, Alesi, ER, Abernathy AP, Balboni TA, Basch EM, Ferrell BR, Loscalzo M, Meier DE, Paice JA, Peppercorn JM, Somerfield M, Stovall E & JH Von Roenn (2012). American Society of clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: The integration of pallative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Onc. Published ahead of printing on Feb 6, 2012.

References

Page 49: ‘Death Panel’ Discussions in a Primary Care Setting

53. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L & Tulsky JA (2000). Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians and other providers. JAMA. 284(19): 2476-2482.

54. Taylor DH (2009). The effect of hospice on Medicare and informal care costs: The U.S. experience. J Pain Symp Mgmt. 38(1): 110-114.

55. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF, Billings JA & Lynch TJ (2010). Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. NEJM. 363(8): 733-742.

56. Teno JM et al. (2011). Decision-making and outcomes of feeding tube insertion: A five-state study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 59: 881-886.

57. Tibi-Levy Y, Le Vaillant M, de Pouvourville G. Determinants of resource utilization in four palliative care units. Palliat Med 2006;20(2):95-106.

58. Unroe KT, Melissa A. Greiner, Adrian F. Hernandez, David J. Whellan, Padma Kaul, Kevin A. Schulman,  Eric D. Peterson, Lesley H. Curtis (2011). Resource use in the last 6 months of life among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure, 2000-2007. Arch Int Med. 171(3): 196-203.

59. Wennberg JE, Elliott S Fisher, Thérèse A Stukel, Jonathan S Skinner, Sandra M Sharp, Kristen K Bronner (2004). Use of hospitals, physician visits and hospice care during the last six months of life among cohorts loyal to highly respected hospitals in the United States. BMJ. 238(2): 598-607.

60. White DB & RM Arnold (2011). The evolution of advance directives. J Am Med Assn. 306(13): 1485-1486.61. Wright AA, Baohui Zhang, Alaka Ray, Jennifer W. Mack, Elizabeth Trice, Tracy Balboni, Susan L. Mitchell,

Vicki A. Jackson, Susan D. Block, Paul K. Maciejewski, Holly G. Prigerson (2008). Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care neat death and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 300(14): 1665-1673.

62. Wunsch H, C. Guerra, A. E. Barnato, D. C. Angus, G. Li, and W. T. Linde-Zwirble, “Three-Year Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries Who Survive Intensive Care,” JAMA 303, no. 5 (2010): 849-856.

63. Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Harrison DA, Barnato AE, Rowan KM & DC Angus (2009). Use of intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations in England and the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 180: 875-880.

64. Yuen JK, Carrington Reid M & MD Fetters (2011). Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: Why they have failed and how to fix them. J Gen Intern Med. 26(7): 791-797.

65. Zhang B, Alexi A. Wright, Haiden A. Huskamp, Matthew E. Nilsson, Matthew L. Maciejewski, Craig C. Earle, Susan D. Block, Paul K. Maciejewski & HG Prigerson (2009). Health care costs in the last week of life: Associations with end of life conversations. Arch Int Med. 169(5): 480-488.

66. Zhao Y & W Encinosa (2009). The costs of end-of-life hospitalizations. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. AHRQ Statistical Brief #81. Revised 2010.

References