46
1 Asma y Ejercicio Josep Morera Barcelona. Octubre 2016

Asma y ejercicio

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Asma y ejercicio

1  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Josep  Morera    Barcelona.    Octubre  2016  

Page 2: Asma y ejercicio

2  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Page 3: Asma y ejercicio

3  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Page 4: Asma y ejercicio

4  

Asma y Ejercicio  

1.-­‐  Definición/Concepto  2.-­‐  Prevalencia/Epidemiologia  3.-­‐  Fisiopatología/E@ología  4.-­‐  Tratamiento  5.-­‐  Diagnós@co  Diferencial  6.-­‐  Conclusiones    

Page 5: Asma y ejercicio

5  

Asma  y  Ejercicio  

Page 6: Asma y ejercicio

6  

Asma  y  Ejercicio  

Page 7: Asma y ejercicio

7  

Asma y Ejercicio  

An  Official  American  Thoracic  Society  Clinical  PracCce  Guideline:  Exercise-­‐induced  BronchoconstricCon    Jonathan  P.  Parsons,  Teal  S.  Hallstrand,  John  G.  Mastronarde,  David  A.  Kaminsky,  Kenneth  W.  Rundell,  James  H.  Hull,  William  W.  Storms,  John  M.  Weiler,  Fern  M.  Cheek,  Kevin  C.  Wilson,  and  Sandra  D.  Anderson;  

Volume  187,  Issue  9(May  1,  2013)  

Page 8: Asma y ejercicio

8  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Volume  63,  Issue  8  August  2008  Pages  953–961    

Exercise-­‐induced  hypersensiCvity  syndromes  in  recreaConal  and  compeCCve  athletes:  a  PRACTALL  consensus  report  (what  the  general  pracCConer  should  know  about  sports  and  allergy)  Schwartz  LB1,  Delgado  L,  Craig  T,  Bonini  S,  Carlsen  KH,  Casale  TB,  Del  Giacco  S,  Drobnic  F,  van  Wijk  RG,  Ferrer  M,  Haahtela  T,  Henderson  WR,  Israel  E,  Lötvall  J,  Moreira  A,  Papadopoulos  NG,  Randolph  CC,  Romano  A,  Weiler  JM.    

Page 9: Asma y ejercicio

9  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Volume  63,  Issue  5  May  2008  Pages  492–505    

Treatment  of  exercise-­‐induced  asthma,  respiratory  and  allergic  disorders  in  sports  and  the  relaConship  to  doping:  Part  II  of  the  report  from  the  Joint  Task  Force  of  European  Respiratory  Society  (ERS)  and  European  Academy  of  Allergy  and  Clinical  Immunology  (EAACI)  in  cooperaCon  with  GA(2)LEN.  Carlsen  KH1,  Anderson  SD,  Bjermer  L,  Bonini  S,  Brusasco  V,  Canonica  W,  Cummiskey  J,  Delgado  L,  Del  Giacco  SR,  Drobnic  F,  Haahtela  T,  Larsson  K,  Palange  P,  Popov  T,  van  Cauwenberge  P;  European  Respiratory  Society;  European  Academy  of  Allergy  and  Clinical  Immunology;  GA(2)LEN.  

Page 10: Asma y ejercicio

10  

Asma y Ejercicio  

La  broncoconstricción/hiperreacCvidad  inducida  por  ejercicio  (EIB),se  refiere  a  un  “estrechamiento”de  las  vías  aéreas  como  resultado  del  ejercicio.    Los  asmáCcos  con  gran  frecuencia  sufren  EIB    El  asma  inducido  por  ejercicio  (EIA)  es  un  concepto  que  se  solapa  con  el  de  EIB    El  asma  bronquial  en  los  Atletas  de  Elite  es  una  situación  clínica  que  se  solapa  con  las  anteriores    El  EIB  ha  recibido  otros  nombres  como“THERMALLY  BRONCHOCONSTRICTION”  

An  Official  American  Thoracic  Society  Clinical  Prac5ce  Guideline:  Exercise-­‐induced  Bronchoconstric5on  

Page 11: Asma y ejercicio

11  

Asma y Ejercicio  

-­‐  Clínica  suges@va(Tos,  disnea,@rantez  torácica,sibilantes  postejercicio  

-­‐  FEV1  pre-­‐post  ejercicio(FEV  ≥  al  10%)  

-­‐  Test  específicos  de  ejercicio  

-­‐  Test  de  provocación  con  Metacolina  y/o  Manitol  

-­‐  Otros:  PEAK  FLOW  (gráfica)                                      ÓXIDO  NÍTRICO  EXHALADO  (FENO)                                      Inhalación  hiperesmolar  de  aerosoles  4.5%  salinos                                      Hiperepnea  eucapníca  voluntaria  

An  Official  American  Thoracic  Society  Clinical  Prac5ce  Guideline:  Exercise-­‐induced  Bronchoconstric5on  

Page 12: Asma y ejercicio

12  

Asma y Ejercicio  

An  Official  American  Thoracic  Society  Clinical  Prac5ce  Guideline:  Exercise-­‐induced  Bronchoconstric5on  

Page 13: Asma y ejercicio

13  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Page 14: Asma y ejercicio

14  

Asma y Ejercicio  

-­‐  Muy  frecuente  

-­‐  Variable  según  países  y  áreas  

-­‐  Entre  20-­‐50%  de  asmá@cos  @enen  asma  inducido  al  esfuerzo  

-­‐  Entre  los  depor@stas  de  Elite  varia  entre  un  15-­‐75%  

Page 15: Asma y ejercicio

15  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Exercise-­‐induced  wheeze,  urgent  medical  visits,  and  neighborhood  asthma  prevalence.  

Map of New York City depicting study subjects’ places of residence overlaying neighborhood asthma prevalence.

Timothy R. Mainardi et al. Pediatrics 2013;131:e127-e135

Page 16: Asma y ejercicio

16  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Percentage  of  athletes  no@fying  (Sydney)  or  approved    (Salt  Lake  City,  Athens,  Torino)    for  b2-­‐agonist  use  and  the  percentage  of  individual  medals  won  by  these  athletes    at  the  2000  to  2006  Olympic  Games.  

FITCH  ET  AL  260.e7  VOLUME  122,NUMBER  2  

Page 17: Asma y ejercicio

17  

Asma y Ejercicio  

K.H.  Carlsen  et  al.  

Page 18: Asma y ejercicio

18  

Asma y Ejercicio  

-­‐  Enfriamiento  de  la  mucosa  -­‐  Calentamiento  de  la  mucosa  -­‐  Aumento  de  la  circulación  bronquial  submucosa  -­‐  Atopia/Alergia  -­‐  Mayor  exposición  a  polen  y  a  otros  alérgenos  -­‐  Exposición  a  Cloro  -­‐  Exposición  a  Ozono/otras  poluciones  ambientales  -­‐    Exposición  a  PM10  por  fuel  en  hielo  ar@ficial  -­‐  Inflamación  eosinovlica/neutrovlica  -­‐  Remodelamiento  -­‐  Otros  

Page 19: Asma y ejercicio

19  

Asma y Ejercicio  

N  Engl  J  Med  1977;  297:743-­‐747October  6,  1977  

N  Engl  J  Med  1987;  317:502-­‐504,    

Page 20: Asma y ejercicio

20  

Asma y Ejercicio  

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

Inhala@on  Toxicology,    15:237–250,  2003  

Page 21: Asma y ejercicio

21  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Bronchoscopy  and  bronchoalveolar  lavage  findings  in  cross-­‐country  skiers  with  and  without  "ski  asthma”.Sue-­‐Chu  M1,  Larsson  L,  Moen  T,  Rennard  SI,  Bjermer  L.  

Eur  Respir  J.  1999  Mar;13(3):626-­‐32.  

Page 22: Asma y ejercicio

22  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Page 23: Asma y ejercicio

23  

Asma y Ejercicio  

AM  J  RESPIR  CRIT  CARE  MED  2000;161:1047–1050.  

Page 24: Asma y ejercicio

24  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Exhaled  breath  condensate  cysteinyl  leukotrienes  are  increased  in  children  with  exercise-­‐induced  bronchoconstricCon.  Carraro  S1,  Corradi  M,  Zanconato  S,  Alinovi  R,  Pasquale  MF,  Zacchello  F,  Baraldi  E.  

2005  Apr;115(4):764-­‐70.  

Page 25: Asma y ejercicio

25  

Asma y Ejercicio  

J  Allergy  Clin  Immunol.  2005  Sep;  116(3):  586–593.    

Airway  immunopathology  of  asthma  with  exercise-­‐induced  bronchoconstricCon.    Hallstrand  TS1,  Moody  MW,  Aitken  ML,  Henderson  WR  Jr.  

Page 26: Asma y ejercicio

26  

Asma y Ejercicio  

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

 VOL  161    2000  

Page 27: Asma y ejercicio

27  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Page 28: Asma y ejercicio

28  

Asma y Ejercicio  

MEDICINE  &  SCIENCE    IN  SPORTS  &  EXERCISE®    2003  

Page 29: Asma y ejercicio

29  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Role  of  MUC5AC  in  the  pathogenesis  of  exercise-­‐induced  bronchoconstricCon.  Hallstrand,  Debley,  Farin,  Henderson.  

CONCLUSIONS:  These  data  indicate  that  (1)  the  predominant  gel-­‐forming  mucin  expressed  in  induced  sputum  of  paCents  with  asthma  with  EIB  is  MUC5AC;  (2)  an  increase  in  MUC5AC  gene  expression  and  release  of  MUC5AC  protein  occurs  acer  exercise  challenge;  and  (3)  MUC5AC  release  may  occur  through  the  cysLT-­‐associated  acCvaCon  of  sensory  airway  nerves  

J  Allergy  Clin  Immunol.    2007  May;119(5):1092-­‐8  

Page 30: Asma y ejercicio

30  

Asma y Ejercicio  

The  PotenCal  Role  of  8-­‐Oxoguanine  DNA  Glycosylase-­‐Driven  DNA  Base  Excision  Repair  in  Exercise-­‐Induced  Asthma.  Belanger  KK1,  Ameredes  BT2,  Boldogh  I3,  Aguilera-­‐Aguirre  L4.  

2016  Jul  25  

Page 31: Asma y ejercicio

31  

Asma y Ejercicio  

The  PotenCal  Role  of  8-­‐Oxoguanine  DNA  Glycosylase-­‐Driven  DNA  Base  Excision  Repair  in  Exercise-­‐Induced  Asthma.Belanger  KK1,  Ameredes  BT2,  Boldogh  I3,  Aguilera-­‐Aguirre  L4.  

2016  Jul  25  

Page 32: Asma y ejercicio

32  

Asma y Ejercicio  Transglutaminase  2,  a  novel  regulator  of  eicosanoid  producCon  in  asthma  revealed  by  genome-­‐wide  expression  profiling  of  disCnct  asthma  phenotypes.Hallstrand  TS1,  Wurfel  MM,  Lai  Y,  Ni  Z,  Gelb  MH,  Altemeier  WA,  Beyer  RP,  Aitken  ML,  Henderson  WR.  

Figure  1.  Comparison  of  lung  funcCon  and  gene  expression  between  asthmaCcs  with  EIB  and  an  asthmaCc  control  group  without  EIB.  

(2010)  PLoS  ONE  5(1)  

Page 33: Asma y ejercicio

33  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Page 34: Asma y ejercicio

34  

Asma y Ejercicio  

CombinaCon  of  budesonide/formoterol  on  demand  improves  asthma  control  by  reducing  exercise-­‐induced  bronchoconstricCon.Lazarinis  N1,  Jørgensen  L,  Ekström  T,  Bjermer  L,  Dahlén  B,  Pullerits  T,  Hedlin  G,  Carlsen  KH,  Larsson  K.  

2014  Feb;69(2):130-­‐6.  

Page 35: Asma y ejercicio

35  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Nedocromil  sodium  in  the  treatment  of  exercise-­‐induced  asthma:  a  meta-­‐analysis.  Spooner  C1,  Rowe  BH,  Saunders  LD.    

Eur  Respir  J.  2000    Jul;16(1):30-­‐7  

Page 36: Asma y ejercicio

36  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Dietary  salt,  airway  inflammaCon,  and  diffusion  capacity  in  exercise-­‐induced  asthma.  Mickleborough  TD1,  Lindley  MR,  Ray  

S.Med  Sci  Sports  Exerc.  2005  Jun;37(6):904-­‐14.  

Page 37: Asma y ejercicio

37  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Treatment  of  exercise-­‐induced  asthma,  respiratory  and  allergic  disorders  in  sports  and  the  relaConship  to  doping:  Part  II  of  the  report  from  the  Joint  Task  Force  of  European  Respiratory  Society  (ERS)  and  European  Academy  of  Allergy  and  Clinical  Immunology  (EAACI)  in  cooperaCon  with  GA2LEN*  K.  H.  Carlsen1,  S.  D.  Anderson2,  L.  Bjermer3,  S.  Bonini4,  V.  Brusasco5,  W.  Canonica6,  J.  Cummiskey7,  L.  Delgado8,  S.  R.  Del  Giacco9,  F.  Drobnic10,  T.  Haahtela11,  K.  Larsson12,  P.  Palange13,  T.  Popov14,  P.  van  Cauwenberge15.        

Allergy    2008:  63:  492–505  

Page 38: Asma y ejercicio

38  

Asma y Ejercicio  

1.-­‐      Disfunción  de  cuerdas  vocales  2.-­‐      Anemia  3.-­‐      Miocardiopa{a  hipertrófica  4.-­‐      Obesidad/  no  fitness  5.-­‐      Disnea  Psicógena  6.-­‐      Uso  de  β-bloqueantes  7.-­‐      TEP  agudo/crónico  8.-­‐      Mal  de  montaña  9.-­‐      Edema  agudo  de  pulmón  10.-­‐  Otros  

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

Page 39: Asma y ejercicio

39  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Vocal  cord  dysfuncCon  in  paCents  with  exerConal  dyspnea.Morris  MJ1,  Deal  LE,  Bean  DR,  Grbach  VX,  Morgan  JA.  

PATIENTS:Forty  military  paCents  with  complaints  of  exerConal  dyspnea  and  12  military  asymptomaCc    control  subjects.  

CONCLUSIONS:Paradoxical  inspiratory  vocal  cord    closure  is  a  frequent  occurrence  in  paCents  with    symptoms  of  exerConal  dyspnea  and  should  be  strongly  considered  in  their  evaluaCon.  

1999  Dec;116(6):1676-­‐82  

Page 40: Asma y ejercicio

40  

Asma y Ejercicio  

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

Article original

L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine autonome :frequence et gravite a propos d’une serie de 19 cas

Pulmonary oedema in scuba-diving: Frequency and seriousnessabout a series of 19 cases

A. Henckes, F. Lion, G. Cochard *, J. Arvieux, C.-C. ArvieuxPole anesthesie–reanimation–Samu, unite de medecine hyperbare, departement d’anesthesie-reanimation,

hopital de la-Cavale-Blanche, CHU de Brest, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest cedex, France

Recu le 21 fevrier 2008 ; accepte le 19 mai 2008

Disponible sur Internet le 31 juillet 2008

Resume

Objectifs. – L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine en scaphandre autonome est un accident dont les facteurs de risque, les conditions desurvenue et l’incidence sont encore mal connus. Le but de cette etude a ete d’etudier la frequence, les facteurs de risque et l’evolution de cetaccident.Type d’etude. – Etude retrospective des cas et prospective de frequence.Patients et methodes. – Etude en deux volets aux objectifs distincts dans la region Bretagne : premierement, analyse de cas pris en charge de 2002 a2007 ; deuxiemement, etude sur une annee des cas recueillis aupres des medecins de premier recours. Le diagnostic a ete etabli sur des elements del’anamnese, un tableau de detresse respiratoire, une auscultation et une imagerie evocatrices.Resultats. – Dix-neuf cas ont ete analyses, dont un recidivant. La moyenne d’age etait de 49 ans. Des plongeurs indemnes de pathologie cardiaqueetaient concernes, ainsi que des hypertendus (huit cas) et des porteurs de valvulopathie (trois cas). Les plongees en cause etaient sources de stress et/oud’effort. La dyspnee, la toux et l’hemoptysie etaient frequentesmais on relevait deux cas d’arret cardiorespiratoire et trois cas de perte de connaissance.La radiographie pulmonaire manquait de sensibilite (normale dans quatre cas), le scanner thoracique n’etait jamais normal. L’evolution etaitrapidement favorable sous oxygenotherapie sauf pour deux plongeurs qui sont decedes. Cinq cas ont ete recueillis sur un an dont un mortel.Conclusion. – Accident non rare, potentiellement grave a ne pas sous-estimer, touchant preferentiellement le plongeur age en conditions de stresset/ou d’effort.# 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Abstract

Objectives. – Pulmonary oedema in self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving is an accident whose risk factors, conditions ofoccurrence and incidence are not well-known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, the risk factors and the evolution of this accident.Study design. – Retrospective case study and prospective frequency study.Patients and methods. – Study covering the Brittany region and performed in two steps with distinct objectives: a review of cases diagnosedbetween 2002 and 2007, and a one-year study of cases reported by emergency physicians. Diagnosis was based on the history, a respiratory distress,auscultation and radiologic features.Results. – Nineteen cases were reported, of which one was recurrent. The mean age of patients was 49 years. Divers without heart disease wereinvolved, as well as divers with hypertension (eight cases) or valve abnormalities (three cases). Stress and/or physical exertion were involved.Dyspnoea, cough and haemoptysis were the most common symptoms; in addition, two cases of cardiac arrest and three of loss of consciousnesswere observed. Chest radiography was unsensitive (normal in four cases), contrasting with abnormal thoracic CT scan in all cases. Symptomsresolved rapidly with oxygen, except for two divers who died. We identified five cases over one year, one of which lethal.

http://france.elsevier.com/direct/ANNFAR/

Disponible en ligne sur www.sciencedirect.com

Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 27 (2008) 694–699

* Auteur correspondant.

Adresse e-mail : [email protected] (G. Cochard).

0750-7658/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2008.05.011

Article original

L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine autonome :frequence et gravite a propos d’une serie de 19 cas

Pulmonary oedema in scuba-diving: Frequency and seriousnessabout a series of 19 cases

A. Henckes, F. Lion, G. Cochard *, J. Arvieux, C.-C. ArvieuxPole anesthesie–reanimation–Samu, unite de medecine hyperbare, departement d’anesthesie-reanimation,

hopital de la-Cavale-Blanche, CHU de Brest, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest cedex, France

Recu le 21 fevrier 2008 ; accepte le 19 mai 2008

Disponible sur Internet le 31 juillet 2008

Resume

Objectifs. – L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine en scaphandre autonome est un accident dont les facteurs de risque, les conditions desurvenue et l’incidence sont encore mal connus. Le but de cette etude a ete d’etudier la frequence, les facteurs de risque et l’evolution de cetaccident.Type d’etude. – Etude retrospective des cas et prospective de frequence.Patients et methodes. – Etude en deux volets aux objectifs distincts dans la region Bretagne : premierement, analyse de cas pris en charge de 2002 a2007 ; deuxiemement, etude sur une annee des cas recueillis aupres des medecins de premier recours. Le diagnostic a ete etabli sur des elements del’anamnese, un tableau de detresse respiratoire, une auscultation et une imagerie evocatrices.Resultats. – Dix-neuf cas ont ete analyses, dont un recidivant. La moyenne d’age etait de 49 ans. Des plongeurs indemnes de pathologie cardiaqueetaient concernes, ainsi que des hypertendus (huit cas) et des porteurs de valvulopathie (trois cas). Les plongees en cause etaient sources de stress et/oud’effort. La dyspnee, la toux et l’hemoptysie etaient frequentesmais on relevait deux cas d’arret cardiorespiratoire et trois cas de perte de connaissance.La radiographie pulmonaire manquait de sensibilite (normale dans quatre cas), le scanner thoracique n’etait jamais normal. L’evolution etaitrapidement favorable sous oxygenotherapie sauf pour deux plongeurs qui sont decedes. Cinq cas ont ete recueillis sur un an dont un mortel.Conclusion. – Accident non rare, potentiellement grave a ne pas sous-estimer, touchant preferentiellement le plongeur age en conditions de stresset/ou d’effort.# 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Abstract

Objectives. – Pulmonary oedema in self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving is an accident whose risk factors, conditions ofoccurrence and incidence are not well-known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, the risk factors and the evolution of this accident.Study design. – Retrospective case study and prospective frequency study.Patients and methods. – Study covering the Brittany region and performed in two steps with distinct objectives: a review of cases diagnosedbetween 2002 and 2007, and a one-year study of cases reported by emergency physicians. Diagnosis was based on the history, a respiratory distress,auscultation and radiologic features.Results. – Nineteen cases were reported, of which one was recurrent. The mean age of patients was 49 years. Divers without heart disease wereinvolved, as well as divers with hypertension (eight cases) or valve abnormalities (three cases). Stress and/or physical exertion were involved.Dyspnoea, cough and haemoptysis were the most common symptoms; in addition, two cases of cardiac arrest and three of loss of consciousnesswere observed. Chest radiography was unsensitive (normal in four cases), contrasting with abnormal thoracic CT scan in all cases. Symptomsresolved rapidly with oxygen, except for two divers who died. We identified five cases over one year, one of which lethal.

http://france.elsevier.com/direct/ANNFAR/

Disponible en ligne sur www.sciencedirect.com

Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 27 (2008) 694–699

* Auteur correspondant.

Adresse e-mail : [email protected] (G. Cochard).

0750-7658/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2008.05.011

Page 41: Asma y ejercicio

41  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Swimming-­‐induced  pulmonary  edema:  clinical  presentaCon  and  serial  lung  funcCon.  Adir  Y1,  Shupak  A,  Gil  A,  Peled  N,  Keynan  Y,  Domachevsky  L,  Weiler-­‐Ravell  D.    Chest.  2004  Aug;126(2):394-­‐9.    

Page 42: Asma y ejercicio

42  

Asma y Ejercicio  

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

Article original

L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine autonome :frequence et gravite a propos d’une serie de 19 cas

Pulmonary oedema in scuba-diving: Frequency and seriousnessabout a series of 19 cases

A. Henckes, F. Lion, G. Cochard *, J. Arvieux, C.-C. ArvieuxPole anesthesie–reanimation–Samu, unite de medecine hyperbare, departement d’anesthesie-reanimation,

hopital de la-Cavale-Blanche, CHU de Brest, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest cedex, France

Recu le 21 fevrier 2008 ; accepte le 19 mai 2008

Disponible sur Internet le 31 juillet 2008

Resume

Objectifs. – L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine en scaphandre autonome est un accident dont les facteurs de risque, les conditions desurvenue et l’incidence sont encore mal connus. Le but de cette etude a ete d’etudier la frequence, les facteurs de risque et l’evolution de cetaccident.Type d’etude. – Etude retrospective des cas et prospective de frequence.Patients et methodes. – Etude en deux volets aux objectifs distincts dans la region Bretagne : premierement, analyse de cas pris en charge de 2002 a2007 ; deuxiemement, etude sur une annee des cas recueillis aupres des medecins de premier recours. Le diagnostic a ete etabli sur des elements del’anamnese, un tableau de detresse respiratoire, une auscultation et une imagerie evocatrices.Resultats. – Dix-neuf cas ont ete analyses, dont un recidivant. La moyenne d’age etait de 49 ans. Des plongeurs indemnes de pathologie cardiaqueetaient concernes, ainsi que des hypertendus (huit cas) et des porteurs de valvulopathie (trois cas). Les plongees en cause etaient sources de stress et/oud’effort. La dyspnee, la toux et l’hemoptysie etaient frequentesmais on relevait deux cas d’arret cardiorespiratoire et trois cas de perte de connaissance.La radiographie pulmonaire manquait de sensibilite (normale dans quatre cas), le scanner thoracique n’etait jamais normal. L’evolution etaitrapidement favorable sous oxygenotherapie sauf pour deux plongeurs qui sont decedes. Cinq cas ont ete recueillis sur un an dont un mortel.Conclusion. – Accident non rare, potentiellement grave a ne pas sous-estimer, touchant preferentiellement le plongeur age en conditions de stresset/ou d’effort.# 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Abstract

Objectives. – Pulmonary oedema in self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving is an accident whose risk factors, conditions ofoccurrence and incidence are not well-known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, the risk factors and the evolution of this accident.Study design. – Retrospective case study and prospective frequency study.Patients and methods. – Study covering the Brittany region and performed in two steps with distinct objectives: a review of cases diagnosedbetween 2002 and 2007, and a one-year study of cases reported by emergency physicians. Diagnosis was based on the history, a respiratory distress,auscultation and radiologic features.Results. – Nineteen cases were reported, of which one was recurrent. The mean age of patients was 49 years. Divers without heart disease wereinvolved, as well as divers with hypertension (eight cases) or valve abnormalities (three cases). Stress and/or physical exertion were involved.Dyspnoea, cough and haemoptysis were the most common symptoms; in addition, two cases of cardiac arrest and three of loss of consciousnesswere observed. Chest radiography was unsensitive (normal in four cases), contrasting with abnormal thoracic CT scan in all cases. Symptomsresolved rapidly with oxygen, except for two divers who died. We identified five cases over one year, one of which lethal.

http://france.elsevier.com/direct/ANNFAR/

Disponible en ligne sur www.sciencedirect.com

Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 27 (2008) 694–699

* Auteur correspondant.

Adresse e-mail : [email protected] (G. Cochard).

0750-7658/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2008.05.011

Article original

L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine autonome :frequence et gravite a propos d’une serie de 19 cas

Pulmonary oedema in scuba-diving: Frequency and seriousnessabout a series of 19 cases

A. Henckes, F. Lion, G. Cochard *, J. Arvieux, C.-C. ArvieuxPole anesthesie–reanimation–Samu, unite de medecine hyperbare, departement d’anesthesie-reanimation,

hopital de la-Cavale-Blanche, CHU de Brest, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest cedex, France

Recu le 21 fevrier 2008 ; accepte le 19 mai 2008

Disponible sur Internet le 31 juillet 2008

Resume

Objectifs. – L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine en scaphandre autonome est un accident dont les facteurs de risque, les conditions desurvenue et l’incidence sont encore mal connus. Le but de cette etude a ete d’etudier la frequence, les facteurs de risque et l’evolution de cetaccident.Type d’etude. – Etude retrospective des cas et prospective de frequence.Patients et methodes. – Etude en deux volets aux objectifs distincts dans la region Bretagne : premierement, analyse de cas pris en charge de 2002 a2007 ; deuxiemement, etude sur une annee des cas recueillis aupres des medecins de premier recours. Le diagnostic a ete etabli sur des elements del’anamnese, un tableau de detresse respiratoire, une auscultation et une imagerie evocatrices.Resultats. – Dix-neuf cas ont ete analyses, dont un recidivant. La moyenne d’age etait de 49 ans. Des plongeurs indemnes de pathologie cardiaqueetaient concernes, ainsi que des hypertendus (huit cas) et des porteurs de valvulopathie (trois cas). Les plongees en cause etaient sources de stress et/oud’effort. La dyspnee, la toux et l’hemoptysie etaient frequentesmais on relevait deux cas d’arret cardiorespiratoire et trois cas de perte de connaissance.La radiographie pulmonaire manquait de sensibilite (normale dans quatre cas), le scanner thoracique n’etait jamais normal. L’evolution etaitrapidement favorable sous oxygenotherapie sauf pour deux plongeurs qui sont decedes. Cinq cas ont ete recueillis sur un an dont un mortel.Conclusion. – Accident non rare, potentiellement grave a ne pas sous-estimer, touchant preferentiellement le plongeur age en conditions de stresset/ou d’effort.# 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Abstract

Objectives. – Pulmonary oedema in self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving is an accident whose risk factors, conditions ofoccurrence and incidence are not well-known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, the risk factors and the evolution of this accident.Study design. – Retrospective case study and prospective frequency study.Patients and methods. – Study covering the Brittany region and performed in two steps with distinct objectives: a review of cases diagnosedbetween 2002 and 2007, and a one-year study of cases reported by emergency physicians. Diagnosis was based on the history, a respiratory distress,auscultation and radiologic features.Results. – Nineteen cases were reported, of which one was recurrent. The mean age of patients was 49 years. Divers without heart disease wereinvolved, as well as divers with hypertension (eight cases) or valve abnormalities (three cases). Stress and/or physical exertion were involved.Dyspnoea, cough and haemoptysis were the most common symptoms; in addition, two cases of cardiac arrest and three of loss of consciousnesswere observed. Chest radiography was unsensitive (normal in four cases), contrasting with abnormal thoracic CT scan in all cases. Symptomsresolved rapidly with oxygen, except for two divers who died. We identified five cases over one year, one of which lethal.

http://france.elsevier.com/direct/ANNFAR/

Disponible en ligne sur www.sciencedirect.com

Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 27 (2008) 694–699

* Auteur correspondant.

Adresse e-mail : [email protected] (G. Cochard).

0750-7658/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2008.05.011

2013  Jan  19;381(9862):242-­‐55.    Br  J  Sports  Med  2012;46(Suppl  I):i69–i77.    

Page 43: Asma y ejercicio

43  

Asma y Ejercicio  

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

2088

AMERICAN JOURNAL O F RESPIRATORY AN D CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 161 2000

RESULTS

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The bron-chodilator test was negative in all control subjects (change inFEV

1

: 5.4

4.1% [mean

SD]) and positive in all asthmaticsubjects (29.3

17.4%). Thirty (75%) skiers were hyperre-sponsive to methacholine (median PD

20

FEV

1

: 1,246

g [IQR:

866 to 1,523]

g). Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 21hyperresponsive and five nonhyperresponsive skiers. Of these,six subjects had consulted their physicians and reported theuse of inhaled

2

-agonists. Coughing in episodes or in relationto exercise was reported by 26 (65%) skiers. Of 15 (38%) ski-ers with atopy, 12 were hyperresponsive to methacholine.

Inflammatory Cell Counts

Assessable bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from allsubjects. Because of unavailability of cryosections, neutrophilcounts were not performed in control subjects and in three ski-ers. Data with cell counts are presented in Table 2 and Figures1 and 2

Group analysis showed that skiers had 43-fold (p

0.001),26-fold (p

0.001), and twofold (p

0.001) greater T-lym-phocyte, macrophage, and eosinophil counts, respectively, thandid controls. The skiers’ neutrophil count was significantlygreater than that of the asthmatic subjects, whereas the lympho-cyte count was not significantly different, and the macrophage,eosinophil, and mast cell counts were lower. On subgroupanalysis by nonatopic status, the neutrophil count in skiers wasnot significantly different and the eosinophil count was signifi-cantly lower than in asthmatic subjects. The mast cell countwas greater in skiers than in controls. There were no signifi-cant differences in cell counts in nonhyperresponsive and hy-perresponsive skiers. Both skier groups had greater macroph-age and lymphocyte counts than controls (Figure 3A), whereas

Figure 1. Density (cells/mm�2) ofmacrophages, T lymphocytes, mastcells, and eosinophils in bronchialbiopsy specimens from controls,skiers with and without BHR andasthmatic subjects. Horizontal bar �median value.

Figure 2. Density (cells/mm�2) of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy spec-imens from skiers w ith and w ithout BHR and from asthmatic subjects.Horizontal bar � median value.

Article original

L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine autonome :frequence et gravite a propos d’une serie de 19 cas

Pulmonary oedema in scuba-diving: Frequency and seriousnessabout a series of 19 cases

A. Henckes, F. Lion, G. Cochard *, J. Arvieux, C.-C. ArvieuxPole anesthesie–reanimation–Samu, unite de medecine hyperbare, departement d’anesthesie-reanimation,

hopital de la-Cavale-Blanche, CHU de Brest, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest cedex, France

Recu le 21 fevrier 2008 ; accepte le 19 mai 2008

Disponible sur Internet le 31 juillet 2008

Resume

Objectifs. – L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine en scaphandre autonome est un accident dont les facteurs de risque, les conditions desurvenue et l’incidence sont encore mal connus. Le but de cette etude a ete d’etudier la frequence, les facteurs de risque et l’evolution de cetaccident.Type d’etude. – Etude retrospective des cas et prospective de frequence.Patients et methodes. – Etude en deux volets aux objectifs distincts dans la region Bretagne : premierement, analyse de cas pris en charge de 2002 a2007 ; deuxiemement, etude sur une annee des cas recueillis aupres des medecins de premier recours. Le diagnostic a ete etabli sur des elements del’anamnese, un tableau de detresse respiratoire, une auscultation et une imagerie evocatrices.Resultats. – Dix-neuf cas ont ete analyses, dont un recidivant. La moyenne d’age etait de 49 ans. Des plongeurs indemnes de pathologie cardiaqueetaient concernes, ainsi que des hypertendus (huit cas) et des porteurs de valvulopathie (trois cas). Les plongees en cause etaient sources de stress et/oud’effort. La dyspnee, la toux et l’hemoptysie etaient frequentesmais on relevait deux cas d’arret cardiorespiratoire et trois cas de perte de connaissance.La radiographie pulmonaire manquait de sensibilite (normale dans quatre cas), le scanner thoracique n’etait jamais normal. L’evolution etaitrapidement favorable sous oxygenotherapie sauf pour deux plongeurs qui sont decedes. Cinq cas ont ete recueillis sur un an dont un mortel.Conclusion. – Accident non rare, potentiellement grave a ne pas sous-estimer, touchant preferentiellement le plongeur age en conditions de stresset/ou d’effort.# 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Abstract

Objectives. – Pulmonary oedema in self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving is an accident whose risk factors, conditions ofoccurrence and incidence are not well-known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, the risk factors and the evolution of this accident.Study design. – Retrospective case study and prospective frequency study.Patients and methods. – Study covering the Brittany region and performed in two steps with distinct objectives: a review of cases diagnosedbetween 2002 and 2007, and a one-year study of cases reported by emergency physicians. Diagnosis was based on the history, a respiratory distress,auscultation and radiologic features.Results. – Nineteen cases were reported, of which one was recurrent. The mean age of patients was 49 years. Divers without heart disease wereinvolved, as well as divers with hypertension (eight cases) or valve abnormalities (three cases). Stress and/or physical exertion were involved.Dyspnoea, cough and haemoptysis were the most common symptoms; in addition, two cases of cardiac arrest and three of loss of consciousnesswere observed. Chest radiography was unsensitive (normal in four cases), contrasting with abnormal thoracic CT scan in all cases. Symptomsresolved rapidly with oxygen, except for two divers who died. We identified five cases over one year, one of which lethal.

http://france.elsevier.com/direct/ANNFAR/

Disponible en ligne sur www.sciencedirect.com

Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 27 (2008) 694–699

* Auteur correspondant.

Adresse e-mail : [email protected] (G. Cochard).

0750-7658/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2008.05.011

Article original

L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine autonome :frequence et gravite a propos d’une serie de 19 cas

Pulmonary oedema in scuba-diving: Frequency and seriousnessabout a series of 19 cases

A. Henckes, F. Lion, G. Cochard *, J. Arvieux, C.-C. ArvieuxPole anesthesie–reanimation–Samu, unite de medecine hyperbare, departement d’anesthesie-reanimation,

hopital de la-Cavale-Blanche, CHU de Brest, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest cedex, France

Recu le 21 fevrier 2008 ; accepte le 19 mai 2008

Disponible sur Internet le 31 juillet 2008

Resume

Objectifs. – L’œdeme pulmonaire en plongee sous-marine en scaphandre autonome est un accident dont les facteurs de risque, les conditions desurvenue et l’incidence sont encore mal connus. Le but de cette etude a ete d’etudier la frequence, les facteurs de risque et l’evolution de cetaccident.Type d’etude. – Etude retrospective des cas et prospective de frequence.Patients et methodes. – Etude en deux volets aux objectifs distincts dans la region Bretagne : premierement, analyse de cas pris en charge de 2002 a2007 ; deuxiemement, etude sur une annee des cas recueillis aupres des medecins de premier recours. Le diagnostic a ete etabli sur des elements del’anamnese, un tableau de detresse respiratoire, une auscultation et une imagerie evocatrices.Resultats. – Dix-neuf cas ont ete analyses, dont un recidivant. La moyenne d’age etait de 49 ans. Des plongeurs indemnes de pathologie cardiaqueetaient concernes, ainsi que des hypertendus (huit cas) et des porteurs de valvulopathie (trois cas). Les plongees en cause etaient sources de stress et/oud’effort. La dyspnee, la toux et l’hemoptysie etaient frequentesmais on relevait deux cas d’arret cardiorespiratoire et trois cas de perte de connaissance.La radiographie pulmonaire manquait de sensibilite (normale dans quatre cas), le scanner thoracique n’etait jamais normal. L’evolution etaitrapidement favorable sous oxygenotherapie sauf pour deux plongeurs qui sont decedes. Cinq cas ont ete recueillis sur un an dont un mortel.Conclusion. – Accident non rare, potentiellement grave a ne pas sous-estimer, touchant preferentiellement le plongeur age en conditions de stresset/ou d’effort.# 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Abstract

Objectives. – Pulmonary oedema in self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving is an accident whose risk factors, conditions ofoccurrence and incidence are not well-known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, the risk factors and the evolution of this accident.Study design. – Retrospective case study and prospective frequency study.Patients and methods. – Study covering the Brittany region and performed in two steps with distinct objectives: a review of cases diagnosedbetween 2002 and 2007, and a one-year study of cases reported by emergency physicians. Diagnosis was based on the history, a respiratory distress,auscultation and radiologic features.Results. – Nineteen cases were reported, of which one was recurrent. The mean age of patients was 49 years. Divers without heart disease wereinvolved, as well as divers with hypertension (eight cases) or valve abnormalities (three cases). Stress and/or physical exertion were involved.Dyspnoea, cough and haemoptysis were the most common symptoms; in addition, two cases of cardiac arrest and three of loss of consciousnesswere observed. Chest radiography was unsensitive (normal in four cases), contrasting with abnormal thoracic CT scan in all cases. Symptomsresolved rapidly with oxygen, except for two divers who died. We identified five cases over one year, one of which lethal.

http://france.elsevier.com/direct/ANNFAR/

Disponible en ligne sur www.sciencedirect.com

Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 27 (2008) 694–699

* Auteur correspondant.

Adresse e-mail : [email protected] (G. Cochard).

0750-7658/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2008.05.011

[Severe  forms  of  effort-­‐induced  asthma].  [ArCcle  in  French]Marotel  C1,  Natali  F,  Heyraud  JD,  Vaylet  F,  L'Her  P,  Bonnet  D,  Allard  P.Allerg  Immunol  (Paris).  1989  Feb;21(2):61-­‐4.  

Abstract  Severe  reacCons  in  exercise-­‐induced  asthma  (EIA)  seem  to  be  underesCmated  in  the  published  literature.  We  report  two  cases  of  near-­‐miss  death  from  EIA  that  occurred  acer  a  short  run.  We  review  364  exercise  tests  that  were  performed  between  September  1987  and  October  1988  by  a  standardised  protocol  on  a  treadmill,  on  paCents  with  possible  EIA.  A  posiCve  test,  defined  by  a  fall  of  FEV1  of  at  least  20%  was  found  in  173  paCents.  From  21  paCents  with  a  fall  of  greater  than  50%,  4  presented  severe  signs  of:  Cyanosis.  Intense  dyspnea  with  impediment  of  speech.  General  malaise  with  hypertension.  These  4  paCents  were  not  greatly  different  from  paCents  of  the  50%  fall  group  when  compared  for  FEV1  before  the  test  and  for  heart-­‐rate  during  the  test.  They  differed  in  the  duraCon  of  the  asthma  atack,  which  was  more  protracted,  despite  the  use  of  beta-­‐2  agonists.  The  onset  of  severe  reacCons  is  2.3%  of  posiCve  tests  and  seems  to  be  unpredictable.  

Page 44: Asma y ejercicio

44  

Asma y Ejercicio  

Page 45: Asma y ejercicio

45  

Asma y Ejercicio  

1.-­‐  Existen  ma@ces  entre  EIB  y  EIA  2.-­‐  Ambos,  EIB  y  EIA  son  muy  prevalentes  con  prevalencias              variables  3.-­‐  La  prevalencia  en  atletas  es  mas  alta  especialmente  en            esquí  de  fondo  y  natación  4.-­‐  Los  mecanismos  fisiopatológicos  son  varios  e              históricamente  ha  predominado  la  hipótesis  de            “enfriamiento”  de  la  mucosa    5.-­‐  El  tratamiento  fundamental  son  los  β-­‐adrenérgicos  SABA    

Page 46: Asma y ejercicio

46