Civilian justice trumps military impunity in MyanmarAILEEN THOMSON 11 December 2014

The rare conviction of a soldier in civilian court shows how, case by case, the criminal justicesystem is slowly taking a stand against the country's still-powerful military.

Flickr/Totaloutnow. Some rights reserved.

In November, a civilian court in Myanmar’s Shan State did what few courts in the country have ever done–itsentenced a soldier in the Myanmar military to prison for a crime committed against a civilian. It did so afterthe military court overseeing the case, under intense pressure from local human rights groups and media,agreed to transfer the defendant to a civilian court. The Burmese law governing courts martial allows such atransfer to civilian courts when a soldier is accused of violating civilian criminal law, including sexualviolence and murder.

openSecurity

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

The victim in this case was a 14-year-old mentally handicapped girl of Kachin ethnicity. The perpetrator,Private Kaung Bo Bo, attacked her while she was on her way to the market, dragged her into some bushes,and raped her. The court found the soldier guilty of kidnapping and rape, and sentenced him to 13 years inprison. Before his civilian trial, a court martial had found him guilty of another crime, leaving his barrackswithout permission, and sentenced him to a year in prison.

The case in question was particularly horrifying, but it sadly fits a well-documented pattern of sexualviolence committed by soldiers against ethnic civilians.

For many years, women’s groups and human rights organizations have documented the use of sexualviolence as a weapon of war in areas of ethnic conflict in Myanmar. Sexual violence is used to terrorizeethnic civilian populations into submission and as punishment for their assumed support of ethnic armedgroups. The Women’s League of Burma and its member organizations have gathered documentationshowing that over 100 women have been raped by members of the Myanmar Army since the countrystarted on its path to peace and democracy in 2010. Nearly half of the attacks were gang rapes. Mostcases were linked to military offensives in Kachin and Northern Shan States.

The push for civilian justice for military abuses is not limited to sexual violence. Torture and killings of ethniccivilians by the Myanmar military are also well-documented. While common in areas of ethnic conflict inMyanmar over the past decades, they have been more frequent in Kachin and northern Shan States in thepast few years. Torture is used in and outside of detention. Villagers in areas of ethnic conflict report beingtortured by members of the Myanmar military as punishment for their perceived support of armed groups,as revenge for a recent military defeat, or to instill fear. Villagers and displaced persons also face arbitraryarrest and detention because their ethnicity or place of residence puts them under suspicion of beingmembers or supporters of an ethnic armed group.

Almost none of these victims of sexual violence, torture and killings—and their families—will likely everhave their day in court. They face numerous obstacles to seeking justice in Myanmar’s criminal justicesystem.

A primary challenge is Article 445 of the 2008 Constitution, which forbids legal action against members ofpast governments for actions undertaken by those governments. Although it is unspecific about who maybe charged, and in what kinds of proceedings, it is widely interpreted as an amnesty provision guaranteeingimpunity to members of the military and government for past and future violations. Yet, it has not completelybarred judicial and non-judicial bodies from considering some violations.

Another challenge is that military courts have jurisdiction over all Defense Services personnel, and thedecision of the Commander in Chief on issues of military justice is final and conclusive. Myanmar’s militaryjustice system is not open to the public, and civil society activists find it difficult, if not impossible, to obtainreliable information about pending or completed cases. Civilians, including victims and their advocates,have no right to be present at the trial or to obtain any information about the charges, findings, or sentence.A recent report by the Women’s League of Burma details the challenges in pursuing military justice,including the transfer of the accused to new jurisdictions, lack of transparency, and intimidation.

Even when civilian courts gain jurisdiction over military personnel, victims’ rights are impeded by institutionsthat should support them. Police often cooperate with the military to pressure victims to stay silent,sometimes offering compensation in exchange for agreements not to press charges or inform the media.Human rights defenders face threats of retaliation and experience difficulty gaining access to victims.

The rape conviction in Shan State demonstrates that it is possible, at least in some cases, to obtain justicefor crimes committed against civilians. There are also reports that last year a soldier was sentenced by a

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

criminal court to life in prison for the rape of a young girl, and other advocates have mentioned three to fourother similar cases.

The Myanmar National Human Rights Committee recently recommended that a civilian court take upanother high-profile case of military abuse in a conflict area—the killing and alleged torture of journalist ParGyi, who was allegedly killed while in military custody in Mon State’s Kyeikmayaw town.

These cases represent some of the first efforts to deal with the past and obtain justice for victims of humanrights violations in Myanmar. The work of civil society, politicians and media on these cases isadmirable. However, the current ad hoc approach is not sustainable. Groups such as the Women’s Leagueof Burma and its member organizations struggle to provide the necessary support for the growing numberof victims who approach them for help in seeking justice.

The military and government can take steps in the short term that would make a significant contribution. Themilitary courts should authorize more transfers of cases of sexual violence, torture, and killings to civiliancriminal courts when requested—starting with accepting the recommendations of the Myanmar NationalHuman Rights Commission in the Par Gyi case and taking steps to ensure the trial is fair and effective. Apolicy that directs all military courts to transfer these cases automatically, or at the least on the request ofthe victim, should be adopted. In a recent interview with Voice of America, Commander in Chief SeniorGeneral Min Aung Hlaing confirmed that, although the military would decide in most cases, civilian justice isan option in some cases when soldiers are accused of human rights violations.

Further, the military leadership should publicly affirm that violations against civilian populations, particularlyrape and sexual assault, can never be excused or tolerated. Military training should be revised to ensurethat human rights violations, particularly sexual violence, are no longer perpetrated, if they are, they must bethoroughly prosecuted. Establishing accountability for the security forces will not only increase theirprofessionalism but ultimately demonstrate that they can and shall be devoted to the protection of civilians.These actions, to avoid recurrences, should pave the way to larger reforms aimed at introducing civilianoversight over the army

The responsibility to provide a remedy for violations goes beyond criminal justice. The Myanmargovernment should take responsibility for the medical, psychosocial and other needs of survivors of sexualviolence and torture, as well as the family members of victims of killings. The government should alsoreform its laws governing these crimes to meet international standards and undertake an investigation ofinstitutional factors that enable or encourage systematic use of sexual violence, torture, and killings asweapons of war, with a view to recommending reforms to prevent their recurrence.

International actors engaged in rule of law assistance also have an important role to play. In their work withthe judiciary, police, and lawyers, they should help to build their capacity to handle cases of sexualviolence, torture, killings and other serious violation of human rights. These courts must also be able to actindependently, both from institutional pressure and from threats or bribes by the accused.

At a time when building trust and reconciliation at all levels—from communities to leaders of armed groups—is a high priority for the Myanmar government, it is important to take steps to address the abuses thatcivilians have suffered in conflict. Without accountability for perpetrators, and without recognition or supportfrom the government to remedy these violations, the survivors of sexual violence and torture and thefamilies of victims killings cannot be expected to have any trust in reforms.

About the author

Aileen Thomson title is Head of Office, Myanmar for the International Center for Transitional Justiceconverted by Web2PDFConvert.com

openDemocracy

HomeAboutTeamSupportersWhat they sayDonateSubmitContactJobs

Sections

openDemocracyFree thinking for the world

OurKingdomInvestigating the crisis ofdemocracy in Britain

oDRRussia and beyond

50.50Critical perspectives: socialjustice, gender, pluralism

Most Popular

Can Russia confrontthe horrors of its domesticviolence epidemic?NATALIA ANTONOVA

A party of enemies hasno future. Labour’s leftand right need to go theirseparate ways.DAVID WEARING

In Myanmar, polls arethe beginning of a largerconversationKATHY FRANKOVIC

PrivacyLicensing &Syndication

Myanmar: the human-rights story behind the spinOLOF BLOMQVISTLAURA HAIGH

Daring to speak: militarism and women’s human rights in BurmaJESSICA NHKUMJENNIFER ALLSOPP

Myanmar’s 2010 elections: a human rights perspectiveBENJAMIN ZAWACKI

Aileen Thomson title is Head of Office, Myanmar for the International Center for Transitional Justice(ICTJ).

Related Articles

Subjects

Myanmar

State violence

Transitional Justice

Related Articles

Myanmar: the human-rights story behind the spinOLOF BLOMQVIST and LAURA HAIGH

Daring to speak: militarism and women’s human rights in BurmaJESSICA NHKUM and JENNIFER ALLSOPP

Myanmar’s 2010 elections: a human rights perspectiveBENJAMIN ZAWACKI

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0licence. If you have any queries about republishing please contact us. Please checkindividual images for licensing details.

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

openSecurityConflict and peacebuilding

TransformationWhere love meets social justice

For the future struggle:what is science fiction?LINDA STUPART and TOM DILLON

European values andthe Arab worldMAGED MANDOUR

AdvertiseMedia InquiriesVacanciesRSS Feed

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com