22
Novel protocol for developing Structure-Property linkages for Polycrystalline materials ME8883/CSE8883 : Material Informatics Group Members: Dipen Patel Akash Gupta

V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Novel protocol for developing Structure-Property linkages for Polycrystalline materials

ME8883/CSE8883 : Material Informatics

Group Members:Dipen Patel

Akash Gupta

Page 2: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Polycrystalline Materialβ€’ Polycrystalline microstructure can include all features of internal

structure of heterogeneous materials at different length scales

β–« e.g.: phase, grain size, crystal orientation, dislocation, voids, interatomic spacing, etc.

The crystal orientation, g, can be defined by a set of three ordered rotations (Ο†1, Ξ¦, Ο†2) that relates the crystal frame to the sample frame.

Spatial distribution of the crystal lattice orientations at the micro scale plays an important role in controlling their effective properties.

Page 3: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Objective/Motivation

β€’ Advance materials are inherently anisotropic

β–« Spatial distribution of the crystal lattice orientations at the micro scale plays an important role in controlling their effective properties.

β€’ Develop protocols for structure-property linkages to tailor materials that meets the functionality and design requirements.

β–« Homogenization: communicating the local properties to higher length scales.

β–« Linkages will ultimately be helpful in process-design

Page 4: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Framework

Page 5: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014
Page 6: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Generating Synthetic Dataset

β€’ Fundamental Zone (FZ) for cubic crystal lattice

β€’ 3D 21 x 21 x 21 microstructures to simulate elastic deformation

β–« 222 distinct orientation were selected on the surface of FZ

β–« Selected orientation were assigned to each class of microstructure

1200 microstructures of each class were included in the calibration dataset

Page 7: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Finite Element Simulations – Property Calculationsβ€’ Periodic boundary conditions* are

applied to elastic deformation model

*Landi, Giacomo, A novel spectral approach to multiscale modelling, PhD Thesis

Effective elastic property, πœŽπ‘–π‘— = πΆπ‘–π‘—π‘˜π‘™πœ€π‘˜π‘™

Page 8: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Step 1: Generation of Calibration Dataset

Generate synthetic representative

microstructures

Obtain mechanical response for each

microstructure using an established

numerical model

Step 3: Establishment of Structure-Property Linkages

Generate linkages using regression

methods on structure and property data

Validate linkages using Leave-One-Out-

Cross-Validation (LOOCV)

Step 2: Reduced Order Quantification of Microstructure

Low-dimensional representation of

microstructure based on Principal

Components Analysis

Quantify microstructure using a desired

subset of n-point correlations

Page 9: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Conventional approach

123

m 𝑔 = π‘š(πœ‘1, Ξ¦, πœ‘2 ) = β„Ž 𝑖𝑓 𝑔 = (πœ‘1, Ξ¦, πœ‘2 ) ∈ β„Ž

β€’ For each bin, indicator basis function is defined as:

𝐻 βˆ’ π‘™π‘œπ‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘ 

where the local state space is divided into H bins, β„Ž = 1,2, … , 𝐻.

Binning of orientation space (FZ)

Building Microstructure Function:

πœ‘1

πœ‘2

Ξ¦

Page 10: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Conventional approach

where the total spatial bin is divided into S bins, s = 1,2, … , 𝑆.

2-Point Statistics using indicator basis:

π‘“π‘‘β„Žβ„Žβ€² =1

𝑆

𝑠=0

𝑆

π‘šπ‘ β„Žπ‘šπ‘ +π‘‘β„Žβ€²

1

2

1630

28

S

Page 11: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

New ApproachBuilding Microstructure Function using continuous basis function:

π‘š(𝑔) =

𝐿

π‘ŽπΏ 𝑇𝐿(𝑔)

𝑓𝑑(𝑔, 𝑔′) =1

𝑆

𝑠=0

π‘†βˆ’1

)π‘šπ‘ (𝑔)π‘šπ‘ +𝑑(𝑔′

g

g

t

where 𝑇𝐿 𝑔 is generalized spherical harmonics basis functions weighted with appropriate coefficients.

2-Point Statistics using continuous basis:

𝑓𝑑(𝑔, 𝑔′) =

𝐿

𝐿′

π‘˜β€²

π‘Žπ‘˜β€²πΏ 𝑇𝐿(𝑔

βˆ—

π‘Žπ‘˜β€²πΏβ€²π‘‡πΏ

β€²(𝑔′)𝑒

2πœ‹π‘–π‘˜β€²π‘‘π‘†

DFTs

Page 12: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

β€’ 2-Points Statistics using indicator basis function

β–« Primitive binning of the local state space is computationally highly inefficient

Binning of FZ leads to large number of discrete local state space for orientation representation

Example:

H (50 bin) = 72 X 9 X 9 = 5832

β–« Not compact for representing orientation

Increase the total number of statistics for higher discretization of the local state

β€’ 2-Points Statistics using GSH basis function

β–« GSH basis allows continuous representation over orientation space

β–« Compact representation of the local state space.

Only 10 local states are required to represent the entire orientation space

Advantages of New Approach

π‘“π‘‘β„Žβ„Žβ€² = 𝑆𝐻2

Page 13: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Quantification of Delta Microstructureβ€’ Plots of Product of Fourier coefficients and their conjugates in real space

𝑓𝑑(𝑔, 𝑔′) =

𝐿

𝐿′

π‘˜β€²

π‘Žπ‘˜β€²πΏ 𝑇𝐿(𝑔

βˆ—

π‘Žπ‘˜β€²πΏβ€²π‘‡πΏ

β€²(𝑔′)𝑒

2πœ‹π‘–π‘˜β€²π‘‘π‘†

π‘Žπ‘˜β€²πΏ βˆ—π‘Žπ‘˜β€²

𝐿′ = πΉπ‘˜πΏ,𝐿′ 𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑑 𝐹𝑑

𝐿,𝐿′

Page 14: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

5 10 15 20

5

10

15

20

Quantification of Fiber Microstructure

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Auto Fiber

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10-0.015

-0.01

-0.005

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

Cross Fiber

Page 15: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Cross Random

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Quantification of Random Microstructure

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Auto Random

Page 16: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

PCA for all 3600 microstructuresDimensionality of each microstructure reduced from 231525 (SH2) to 25 (significant PCs)

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

10

20

30

40

50

PCs

Expla

ined V

ariance

Page 17: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014
Page 18: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Preliminary Results: Regression/LOOCV analysis for linkagesβ€’ Number of PC basis (p) and degree of polynomial (n) can be varied to arrive at best linkage

without over-fitting the data.

All microstructures. Number of PC = 5 , Power of polynomial (n) = 2

165 170 175 180 185

165

170

175

180

185

yhat

y

Goodness of Fit Scatter Plot

𝐢11 = 𝑓𝑛(𝑃𝐢1, 𝑃𝐢2, … . , 𝑃𝐢𝑝)

𝐢11GPafromsimulation

π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘‘π‘–π‘π‘‘π‘’π‘‘ 𝐢11 (GPa)

Page 19: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Conclusions

β€’ Novel protocol is presented for efficiently capturing structure-property linkages for polycrystalline material.

β€’ GSH provides a continuous basis function for compact representation of crystal orientation

β€’ PCA results look promising as they were able to separate out different class of microstructures

β€’ Structure-property linkages for elastic response of polycrystalline material have been developed but linkages needs further improvement.

β€’ Further extension of structure-property linkages to capture plastic response.

Page 20: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014

Collaboration/Acknowledgement

β–« Yuksel Yabansu, GT (code for generation of microstructure dataset)

β–« David Brough, GT (for discussions on GSH )

β–« Ahmet Cecen, GT (for Low Rank Approx. to compute PCA)

β–« Course instructors: Dr. Kalidindi and Dr. Fast

Page 21: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014
Page 22: V2 final presentation 08-12-2014