17
DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF AN ACTIVE SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHERS IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS Matteo Emanuelli S. Ali Nasseri CJ Nwosa Siddharth Raval Andrea Turconi SGAC Space Safety and Sustainability Working Group

Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

During the past few years, several research programs have assessed the current state and future evolution of the Low Earth Orbit region. These studies indicate that space debris density could reach a critical level such that there will be a continuous increase in the number of debris objects, primarily driven by debris-debris collision activity known as the Kessler effect. These studies also highlight the urgency for active debris removal. An Active Debris Removal System (ADRS) is capable of approaching the debris object through a close-range rendezvous, stabilizing its attitude, establishing physical connection, and finally de-orbiting the debris object. The de-orbiting phase could be powered by a chemical engine or an electrodynamic tether (EDT) system. The aim of this project is to model and evaluate a debris removal mission in which an adapted rocket upper stage, equipped with an electrodynamic tether (EDT) system, is employed for de-orbiting a debris object. This hybrid ADRS is assumed to be initially part of a launch vehicle on a normal satellite deployment mission, and a far-approach manoeuvre will be required to align the ADRS’ orbit with that of the target debris. We begin by selecting a suitable target debris and launch vehicle, and then proceed to modelling the entire debris removal mission from launch to de-orbiting of the target debris object using Analytical Graphic Inc.’s Systems Tool Kit (STK). Presented at the 2012 Beining Space Sustainability Conference

Citation preview

Page 1: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ACTIVE SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHERS

IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Matteo EmanuelliS. Ali NasseriCJ NwosaSiddharth Raval Andrea Turconi

SGAC Space Safety and Sustainability Working Group

Page 2: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

04/11/2023SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK

IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS 2

• Introduction

• Target Debris

• Mission Phases

• Launch Vehicle and Launch Site determination

• Mission Simulation in STK and Orbital Maneuvers

• Electrodynamic Tether

• Chemical Propulsion Analysis

• Conclusions and Future Work

CONTENT

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 3: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

3IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Introduction

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

• Space Debris: Critical Level LEO• Kessler Effect• Idea: Integrate de-orbiting system with an

upper stage• Each upper stage will de-orbit itself and

space debris• We can use upper stage subsystems

during the mission, reducing mission costs.

Page 4: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

4IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Launch and separation of payloads

Maneuver to approach space debris 

Grab debris and control attitude

Decrease inclination (chemical propulsion)

Reduce altitude using EDT

Introduction: Flight Phases

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 5: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

5IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Target Debris Identification

157

33

1419

1110 8

27

Target Debris

KomosSoyuzTsyklon-3ZenitDneprThor Burner 2AScoutOther

Kosmos 3M

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

• Low earth orbit. • Selected body:

Kosmos 3M

Page 6: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

6IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Mean Motion (deg/s) 0.0573292 Eccentricity 0.002639Inclination (deg) 82.976Argument of Perigee (deg) 151.655RAAN (deg) 233.421Mean Anomaly (deg) 208.605

Target Debris Identification

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 7: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

7IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• Analyzed all launch vehicles with• Upper stage restartability• Large payload mass for SSO• High propellant capacity

• Chosen Launch Vehicles:• Soyuz 2 with Fregat upper stage• Proton-M with Breeze-M upper stage

• Chosen Launch site: • Plesetsk (Russian Federation - 62°57′35″N,

40°41′2″E)

Launch Vehicle and Launch Site

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 8: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

8IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Mission Simulation in STK

ManeuverVelocity

Increment (km/s)

Provided by

Launch to Park Orbit - Launch VehicleAltitude increase 0.105 UpperstageHohman transfer 0.056 UpperstageCombined change 0.849 UpperstageInclination change 1 (83 to 74 deg) 1.71 UpperstageInclination change 2 (74 to 66 deg) 1.101 UpperstageInclination change 3 (66 to 53 deg) 1.809 UpperstageInclination change 4 (53 to 43 deg) 1.402 UpperstageInclination change 5 (43 to 29 deg) 1.576 UpperstageInclination change 6 (29 to 18 deg) 2.808 UpperstageAltitude Decrease (900 to 500 km) Depends EDT

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 9: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

9IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• EDT mass 80 kg

EDT Model

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 10: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

10IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Soyuz upper stage(Fregat)

Proton upper stage(Breeze-M)

Primary payload mass (ton) 1-3 4-5Vacuum specific impulse (s) 327 325.5Propellant mass (ton) 5.35 19.8Structural mass (ton) 1 2.37EDT mass (kg) 80Debris altitude (km) 900Debris inclination (deg) 83Kosmos 3M mass (kg) 1435Target orbit (km) 500

Mass and Altitude Properties

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 11: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

11IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

(a) Propellant used versus inclination at which EDT is turned on for the Soyuz

upper stage

(b) Propellant used versus inclination at which EDT is turned on for the Proton

upper stage

Results: Propellant use

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 12: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

12IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

(c) Residual propellant versus inclination at which EDT is turned on for the Soyuz

upper stage

(d) Residual propellant versus inclination at which EDT is turned on for the Proton

upper stage

Results: Residual Propellant

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 13: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

13IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

(e) Time to de-orbit versus inclination at which EDT is turned on for the Soyuz

upper stage

(f) Time to de-orbit versus inclination at which EDT is turned on for the Proton

upper stage

Results: De-orbiting Time

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 14: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

14IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• Modified Soyuz or Proton upper stage equipped with a tether system, can deliver a primary payload to a 900 km polar orbit and connect to a Kosmos 3M 2nd stage to de-orbit it.

• It is clear that a hybrid solution using a chemical-EDT system is the best choice for this particular mission because of the short quantity of propellant left from previous stages of the mission.

Conclusions

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 15: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

15IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

• Further simulation to refine the preliminary result

• Modelling the close approach, grabbing and stabilization of the space debris

• Simulating the EDT system using MATLAB

Future Work

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 16: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

16IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Acknowledgement

1. Analytical Graphics, Inc. (AGI)

2. Secure World Foundation

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT

Page 17: Design and Evaluation of an Active Space Debris Removal Mission with Chemical and Elechtrodynamic Propulsion System

SGAC: BEYOND A NETWORK 04/11/2023

17IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS

Space Safety and Sustainability Group

Sustaining space activities for future generations

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.spacegeneration.org/sss

Thank you!

DESIGN  AND EVALUATION OF AN ADR MISSION USING CHEMICAL PROPULSION AND EDT