Upload
omarashraf87
View
1.748
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Lecture 2
Citation preview
Meanings of IRMeanings of IR
The term ‘international’ was first used by The term ‘international’ was first used by
Jeromy Bentham Jeromy Bentham in the later part of eighteenth in the later part of eighteenth
century, with regards the law of nations. century, with regards the law of nations.
Consequently, the term international relations Consequently, the term international relations
was used to define the official relations between was used to define the official relations between
the nation-statesthe nation-states
Two views regarding the meaning of IRTwo views regarding the meaning of IR
Narrow view:Narrow view: international relations are “the international relations are “the
official relations conducted by the official relations conducted by the
authorized leaders of the stateauthorized leaders of the state
Broader viewBroader view: official and unofficial relations : official and unofficial relations
by official and unofficial organizations fall by official and unofficial organizations fall
within the domains of international relations within the domains of international relations
Other ViewsOther Views
K.JK.J Holsti Holsti “It is not only the nations “It is not only the nations
which international relations may which international relations may
refer to all forms of interactions refer to all forms of interactions
between the members of separate between the members of separate
societies, whether government societies, whether government
sponsored or notsponsored or not
Quincy Wright, “It is not only the nations which
international relations seek to regulate -----
Varied types of groups--- nations, states, governments,
people, regions, alliances, confederations, international
organizations, cultural organizations, religious
organizations must be dealt with in the study of
international relations, if the treatment is made realistic
“International relations is the discipline,
which tries to explain political activities
across states boundaries and, to date,
it has been chiefly concerned with the
political relations between government
the official representatives of states
Stanley Hoffmann, the discipline of
international relations is concerned with
the factors and activities, which affect
the external policies and the power of
basic units into which the world is divided
Trygue Mathiesen says, “it embraces all
kinds of relations traversing state
boundaries, no matter whether they are
of an economic, legal, political or any other
character, whether they be private or
official, and all human behavior originating
on one side of a state boundary and
affecting human behavior on the other side
of boundary
According to Theodore A. Couloumbis &
James H. Wolfe “It is not only a distant field of
study, but it also include international theory,
comparative foreign policy analysis,
international organizations comparative politics
and regional studies strategic studies,
international development, international
communications, peace studies and conflict
resolutions including arms control and
disarmament
In summary; the IR, includes;
a wide variety of
transnational relation,
official and unofficial, formal
& informal
EVALUATIONARY PHASES OF IR EVALUATIONARY PHASES OF IR
Historical phaseHistorical phase; how the ; how the present had been present had been
formed from the past. Legalistic phase, nation states formed from the past. Legalistic phase, nation states
increasingly implicated in a complex set of rulesincreasingly implicated in a complex set of rules
Organizational PhaseOrganizational Phase; foundation of IR & ordering the ; foundation of IR & ordering the
world through international institutions like; League of world through international institutions like; League of
Nations after WW-INations after WW-I
Great Power Interplay PhaseGreat Power Interplay Phase; Military strategy came ; Military strategy came
into being –disastrous stage birth of UNO after WW-IIinto being –disastrous stage birth of UNO after WW-II
Cold War PhaseCold War Phase; ; Controversies over the Controversies over the
Ideologies in world politics & appearance of bi-Ideologies in world politics & appearance of bi-
polarism; idealism & realism of nation- state’s polarism; idealism & realism of nation- state’s
power dominated power dominated
Sanitized Realism phaseSanitized Realism phase; autonomy of state ; autonomy of state
actors & their max role in the name of National actors & their max role in the name of National
interest. Traditionalism prevailed in academic IRinterest. Traditionalism prevailed in academic IR
Scientific Thinking PhaseScientific Thinking Phase; Replaced both ; Replaced both
classical & traditional orientation by scientific classical & traditional orientation by scientific
method, behaviouralists playedmethod, behaviouralists played
Post-behavioural PhasePost-behavioural Phase; Peace & world order ; Peace & world order
got central position. Institutionalization of new got central position. Institutionalization of new
field of IR; International Political Economyfield of IR; International Political Economy
International Relations & International Politics
An interchangeable Term; EH carr & Quincy Wright
IR has wider scope than intl Politics; John Hanessian, Spiro etc
IR is Primarily used to describe official Political relations between govts on behalf of states
Intl Politics is not conducted between
or among nations
Padefold & Lincoln: IR & intl politics
are two different aspects
Scope of IRScope of IR
Pre WW-IPre WW-I; Study of Diplomatic History & ; Study of Diplomatic History &
Contemporary International AffairsContemporary International Affairs
Post WW-IIPost WW-II; International Law, ; International Law,
International Institutions & OrganizationsInternational Institutions & Organizations
Pre WW-II Pre WW-II – War as an instrument of state – War as an instrument of state
craft & Global system of collective securitycraft & Global system of collective security
Post WW-II; Post WW-II; Enhancement in the Political & Enhancement in the Political & economic aspects of IReconomic aspects of IR
Current Scope of IR; Diplomatic Theory,
International Principles, National Interest,
Foreign Policy, International Affairs,
International Law, International Institutions,
Etc
Five Ingredients of IRFive Ingredients of IR Nature and operations of state systemNature and operations of state system
Factors which effect the power of the Factors which effect the power of the statestate
International positions and foreign & International positions and foreign & foreign policies of the great powersforeign policies of the great powers
The history of recent international The history of recent international relationsrelations
The buildings of a more stable world orderThe buildings of a more stable world order
Seven Ingredients by Vencent Baker
The Nature & Principle forces of International Politics
The Political, Social & Economic organization of social life
The element of National Power
The instrument available for promotion of the National interest
The limitation & control of national Power
The foreign Policy of one or more major powers & occasionally of small state
The historical ingredient as a background for other factors & as a history of recent international events
Why Study IR Studying the International Political
activities
Study of Human’s behavior & its effects on International Politics
Contribution to the formulation of Foreign Policy
Study of IR for awareness of Concepts, hypothesis & Model of disciplines to develop views
Approaches to study IR
Traditional Approach
Scientific Approach
Behavioural Approach
Post- Behavioural Approach
System Approach
Traditional Approach (TA) Derived from Philosophy, history & Law Have tentative & inconclusive status As per TA: “IR is Study of patterns of
actions & reactions among sovereign states – covers range of relationships spanning from cooperation to conflict & from Peace to War”
Variables affect the behavior of diplomats & administrators, who implement the state Policy
Factors are; climatic, geographic, population, interest, religion ideology etc.
Leading exponents of TA; Raymond Aron, Stanley Hoff mann, Hans Morgenthau etc
Morgenthau advanced the theory of Political Realism
Basic Concepts of TA; Balance of Power, world order & National interest
IR is a sub Division of Political Science & History with a unique identity
Minor variants of TA; Historical, philosophical, legal & institutional
MAJOR VARIANTS OF TRADITIONAL APPROACH
REALIST THEORY Leading exponents: Geoge Kennon,
Henry Kissinger & Hans J Morgenthau International Politics like other Politics is
a struggle for Power Whatever the ultimate aims of
International politics; power is always immediate aims
Statesmen and people may ultimately, seek freedom, security prosperity or prosperity or power itself, they may define their goals power itself, they may define their goals in terms of religious, philosophy, in terms of religious, philosophy, economic or social idealseconomic or social ideals
They may hope that this ideals will materialize through its own inner force, through divine intervention or through the natural development of human affairs
They may also try to further its realization through non-political means, such as technical cooperation, but whenever they strive to realize their goal by means of international politics, they do so by striving for power”
Morgenthau’s six Morgenthau’s six principles of Realist theoryprinciples of Realist theory
Politics isPolitics is governed by objective governed by objective
laws, which are based on human laws, which are based on human
nature and psychologynature and psychology
The facts can be ascertained The facts can be ascertained
through reasons, thus political through reasons, thus political
theory is based on human theory is based on human
psychology and reasonpsychology and reason
The concept of the national interests The concept of the national interests
can be defined in the terms of can be defined in the terms of
power. Politics can be understood on power. Politics can be understood on
rational basis rather than moral or rational basis rather than moral or
religious onesreligious ones
National interests is not fixed & is National interests is not fixed & is
molded by the environments, thus molded by the environments, thus
the environment determines the the environment determines the
political actionpolitical action
Universal moral principles can not Universal moral principles can not
be applied to states actions and be applied to states actions and
these must be molded to the these must be molded to the
circumstances of time and placecircumstances of time and place
State can not observe the same State can not observe the same
standard of standard of morality, as are morality, as are
observed by individual. Individual observed by individual. Individual
can scarify his liberty for moral can scarify his liberty for moral
principle, but sate can notprinciple, but sate can not
There are no identity between moral There are no identity between moral
aspiration of a nation and moral law, which aspiration of a nation and moral law, which
govern the universe and asserts that all govern the universe and asserts that all
political actors pursue their national interestspolitical actors pursue their national interests
Political sphere is an autonomous as the Political sphere is an autonomous as the
spheres of economists or the lawyers or the spheres of economists or the lawyers or the
moralist. The political actors think in the term moralist. The political actors think in the term
of national interests, as the economist think in of national interests, as the economist think in
term of utility and lawyer in the term of term of utility and lawyer in the term of
conformity of action with moral principlesconformity of action with moral principles
Theory is ambiguous & inconsistent No universally accepted definition Wrongly assumed that all individual
& states seek their national interests in term of Power
Wrong assumption that Power is the most
important goal which Nations Pursue
Criticism
Is defective; treats the World as a
static unit
Wrong in claiming that national
Interest carries its own morality
Defective in a sense that hardly
there is any relationship or activity
which does not involve Power
Advantage of Realist Theory
Persuasive & supported by historical experience
Compels scholars to re-evaluate their own assumption
Relied by Scholars due to its validity
Leading exponents : Rousseau, Kant, Woodrow Wilson & Condorcet
Power Politics as passing Phase of history
Future international society based on notion of reformed Intl system
free from, Power Politics ; immorality & violence
Aims at bringing about a better world with help of education & Intl
organizations
The Idealist Theory
Rousseau says “ let us not search for what has been done, but rather what should be done & lets dismiss evil & mercenary authority….”
The system asks for high morale Principles in Place of Power – generally not Possible in Practice
Need to defeat totalitarian forces through democratic methods – difficult to attain
Theory is also short of factual position – Nations do not behaves as expected
Criticism
Salient of Traditional Approach
Adoption of middle course –
Ecliptics; a synthesis of Realist &
Idealist Theories TA is too Vague as a whole Traditionalists do not analyze
the international issues but remain in Past
Main exponents : Harold Guetzkow, Morton
A. Kaplon, Kelmon, Rosenau etc
The approach advanced tentative hypothesis
Based on logical & mathematical Proofs or
strict empirical Procedures of verifications
Collections of data & relevant material to verify or
discord original hypothesis to includes; collection;
classification, arrangement & appraisal leads to;
explanation; predictions & prescription
Scientific Approach
Produced more promises than
performance & more process analysis then
substantive experimentation
Scientific facts can be acquired through:
data collection; data classification;
arrangements of data & setting up of
generalization
Difficulties of scientific approach: Personal
involvements; Characteristic of data &
Process of Acquiring Knowledge
Originated in 1960s/1970s
Leading exponents; Karl W. Deutsch
Politics can not be studied scientifically
Scientific analysis concerned with facts
not values & IR is not free from Values
Focused on methodology rather on facts
or ideas , thus called behavioral approach
BEHAVIORAL APPROACH
Study IR, FP by concentrating on
actions & behavior of individuals &
statesmen
Main contributors are behavioural
sciences like: Sociology, Psychology &
Anthropology
Approach can not be relived upon
because; behavior of state being an
aggregate can’t be determined
Promoter; Rudolph Rummel Originated in 1980s Eclectic trend in study of approaches Two findings for the courses of Wars
by Rummel : democratic states less involve in wars; then authoritarian & libertarian states do not engage in War for economic progress & prosperity
IR is in transition ever since
Post Behavioral Approach
Dependency Theorists
Class is much better unit of
analysis than state & IR divides
World horizontally or into nation
states whereas,
Reality of Political or economical
life can be better understood in
vertical Terms
World order Theorists: represents the latest stand in idealist though, they believe that the human kind is being threatened by nuclear war, environmental pollution, over –population & recourse-exhaustion
They call for the peaceful transition from the present anarchic international system to new World order based on legitimate representative international institutions
The failure will result in the destruction of world through any of above mentioned devices
Independent Theorsts: represent a
synthesis of idealist & realist approaches
They employ the idealist traditions in
forecasting the gradual development of
an international system of complex
interdependence, in which economic,
technological & cultural interdependence
will render classical warfare over
territorial issues
They also turn to the realistic
approach & focus on international
clusters of specialized activity, such
as international trade, international
debt, arms control disarmament &
war disbandment,
Regime studies employ realist
hypothesis in the sense that they
relate regime stability to the
existence of a single hegemonic
power or a nuclear of great power
that together establish the basic
rules of the game
Practicability: post behavioural approach
is more practicable than behavioural
Leading exponents: Jorden, Gunner, Mydal, Stanely Mortan A. Kaplan etc
Originated in 1950s ; aimed to consider IR from the Perspective of Intl system in the Post WW II scenario
An attempt to re-focus attention on the complex interaction between states while retaining the scientific orientation Propounded by behaviourlism
System Approach
Provides only possible method, which can
ensure the development of scientific Politics
System is a set of parts which is interrelated
& independent. It is a complex whole broken
into component Parts, being interconnected
MOST-INCLUSIVE SYSTEM MOST-INCLUSIVE SYSTEM WORLD POLITICAL SYSTEMWORLD POLITICAL SYSTEM
Larger SystemLarger System
Nation State GeographicNation State Geographic Multi- International Multi- International TransnationTransnation
regionsregions National Organizations National Organizations ReligiousReligious
CooperationCooperation Movements Movements
IntermediateIntermediate
SystemSystem
VillagesVillages SocialSocial PoliticalPolitical LabourLabour CorporationCorporationEthnicEthnic
& cities& cities ClassesClasses PartiesParties UnionsUnions groupsgroups
LowestLowest
SystemSystem
House holdingHouse holding Family Family
PROCESS OF SYSTEM APPROACH
Intl system is classified into: Social;
Economic & Political system
Social system focus on Primary units like;
individuals, families, social & ethnic groups &
other entities
Economic system study: National economic
system & function of individuals, forms,
corporation, labour union, economic classes/
activities & govt Jurisdiction
Political system focus on; national
Political system, roles of Political
Parties, individuals & Pressure &
interest groups
Morton Kaplan’s Six Models Morton Kaplan’s Six Models of International Systemof International System
Balance of PowerBalance of Power
The Loose Bipolar ModelThe Loose Bipolar Model
The Tight Bipolar ModelThe Tight Bipolar Model
The Unit Veto ModelThe Unit Veto Model
The Collective Security ModelThe Collective Security Model
The Multi-block ModelThe Multi-block Model
The Multi-polar ModelThe Multi-polar Model
The Mono-polar ModelThe Mono-polar Model
Balance of PowerBalance of Power Precedence: 1815-1914; five major
powers Specific alliance system-limited wars
between major powers-minor powers not allowed to escalate
Intl law remained operative Would it happen again-WMD & UNO Critic: Limited Nuclear powers & its use
as per their wish; Regional organizations & their domination by major powers
The Loose Bipolar ModelThe Loose Bipolar Model
Cold war model; existed from 1947-1971 Two super powers in intl system Controller & protectors of weaker states Strict abidance of respective ideologies &
credible Nuc arsenals by US & USSR Change from Nuc to Economic, industrial
& conventional military capabilities Long term alliance, readiness for
destruction, but avoided confrontations
The Tight Bipolar ModelThe Tight Bipolar Model Non Aligned nations absorbed into one or the
other block Uncompressing hostility on ideology & security
remained like LBM Each super power maintained tight control over its
allies Duopoly; assurance of less conflictive system by
each super power by playing down their ideological differences
B. C.
The Unit Veto ModelThe Unit Veto Model
Depicts highly unstable model, mainly because of Nuc weapon by max states
Increases mistrust & doubts, leading to destruction of the world
No conventional wars Crux of model: ask for a single global
authority; controlling all nuclear weapons Any Nuc accident would destroy the world
The Collective Security The Collective Security ModelModel
Ask for a voluntary system for global security without military power
No aggressions, no alliances Violators to be punished by economic &
military sanctions by all states UNO to resolve all outstanding issues Critic: Not practical; like balance of power,
national interests & volunteer submissions
The Multi-block ModelThe Multi-block Model
Division of world into 5/7 blocks; each to be controlled by one of world super power
Maintaining influence through institutionalization of security pacts like; NATO etc.
Economic & political integration at block level like; ASEAN, EU etc
Will affect balance of power & No trans- continental power will exist
The Multi-polar ModelThe Multi-polar Model
Nation states face fragmentation & disintegration by regional, racial, multi-lingual /multi-religious tendencies
Separatists movements are likely to increase
A dangerous model for existence of nation state system
The Mono-polar ModelThe Mono-polar Model
Hierarchical model; opposite to the balance of power system
Can be achieved from conquest or control of globe by a single power
US as single power dictates the world today
May be democratic or authoritarian; would not be very stable