23
Topic 1 Foundations of Environmental Systems and Societies 1.4 Sustainability

Summary of topic 1.4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Summary of topic 1.4

Topic 1Foundations of Environmental Systems and Societies

1.4 Sustainability

Page 2: Summary of topic 1.4

Natural Capital• The resources available for exploitation by humans• These exist in the biosphere, the lithosphere and the atmosphere• Some natural capital is renewable and replenishable and

therefore in theory can be exploited indefinitely• However, other types of natural capital are non-renewable• Natural capital produces natural income in the form of goods and

services– Goods are marketable commodities such as timber and grain– Services are functions such as flood protection, climate stabilisation and

maintenance of soil fertility• Natural Income is the yield obtained from natural capital

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWOAj7YNLq4

Page 3: Summary of topic 1.4

Natural Capital• Renewable

– Living things and ecosystems that can be replaced by natural productivity (photosynthesis) as quickly as they are used up (yield = productivity); e.g. timber, food crops

• Replenishable– Non-living resources which are continually replaced by natural

processes. They depend on abiotic processes for replenishment; e.g. solar energy, geothermal energy, ozone, water

• Non-renewable– Natural resources which cannot be replaced (at least on a

timescale close to that at which they are used). They include fossil fuels and minerals; e.g. fossil fuels, nuclear energy sources, helium

Page 4: Summary of topic 1.4

Natural Capital

PRODUCERS CONSUMERS

THE ENVIRONMENT

Waste for recycling

Natural capital (including non-renewables)

Natural income (goods and services)

Financial gain

Page 5: Summary of topic 1.4

Non-renewable Natural Capital• These are not renewable or

replenishable and therefore will eventually run out

• It is not yet clear how long the Earth’s fossil fuels will last (new discoveries are being made and new methods of exploitation are being developed)

• It is clear there is a need to minimise use, minimise waste, recycle, reuse and replace fossil fuels

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FSklijcPHghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq7Yn5pUJ3A

Page 6: Summary of topic 1.4

Environmental Philosophies• Technocentric

– A view that shortages of natural capital will always be overcome by advances in technology

– Tends to predominate in MEDCs (where people are more remote from nature)

• Ecocentric– A view that shortages in natural capital are best approached

by limiting the use of non-renewable resources and switching to renewables

– Tends to predominate in LEDCs (where people are in closer contact with nature)

Page 7: Summary of topic 1.4

The Dynamic Nature of Natural Capital• The value and status of natural capital changes over

time (it is dynamic)• As new technologies are developed, resources which

once had little value may become valuable commodities (e.g. before the advent of the combustion engine oil (bitumen) was used primarily only as waterproofing for houses and boats; before the nuclear age uranium was not seen as having value)

• Conversely, as old technologies are superseded, resources may also lose their value (e.g. flint used to make stone axes was superseded when metal tools were developed)

Page 8: Summary of topic 1.4

The Intrinsic Value of Natural Capital• Economic value

– The monetary value gained by producers and paid by consumers

• Ecological value– Services provided by nature independently of economic

value (e.g. prevention of soil erosion, carbon sequestration and oxygen production by photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation)

• Aesthetic value– The appreciation of the beauty of nature

• Recreational value– Holiday destinations and places to relax or use for sports etc.

http://edroness.blogspot.mx/2013/10/putting-value-on-nature.html

Page 9: Summary of topic 1.4

The Intrinsic Value of Natural Capital• Consumptive use

– Harvesting (timber, crops, animals, medicines etc.)• Non-consumptive use

– Recreational use and cultural activities• Indirect use

– Benefits provided by the ecosystem itself (water filtration, prevention of erosion etc.)

• Optional use– Potential future use – by your generation (option value), or future

generations (bequest value)• Non-use (existence use)

– Aesthetic valueThere is a lot of debate about how we can find ways to give value to nature. You could argue it is actually impossible

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zuJdY_Wrng

Page 10: Summary of topic 1.4

Sustainability

• Sustainability– The use and management of resources that allows their full

natural replacement and full recovery of the ecosystem afterwards(IB ESS guide)

• Sustainable Development– ‘Development that meets the needs of the present without

compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (UN World Commission on Environment and Development)

Page 11: Summary of topic 1.4

Sustainability

• The rate at which replenishable and renewable natural capital may be exploited to allow regeneration

• Long-term harvesting or release of pollution should not exceed rates of natural capital regeneration

• During processing to produce goods, sustainability should be applied at each level of the supply chain

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmnWIOgc39k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5r4loXPyx8

Page 12: Summary of topic 1.4

Sustainable Development

• This concept incorporates economic and social factors together with time

• The problem is that your idea of what sustainable development is changes with your viewpoint. An economist’s idea of it would be different to an environmentalist’s (some might actually argue that sustainability and development are actually contradictions in terms)

Page 13: Summary of topic 1.4

Sustainable Development• Not-possible?

– People are not prepared to accept a reduction in their standard of living– Non-renewable resources are running out– LEDCs are home to 80% of the world’s population and are using increasing

amounts of natural capital– The oil lobby is very powerful (especially in the U.S.)– Some problems are local in nature while others are global

• Possible?– Use of renewable resources is increasing– Renewable technologies are become cheaper and more accepted– We may have no choice in the future but to embrace an economy based

on renewable and replenishable resources

The choices we make are largely dependent on our environmental philosophies

Page 14: Summary of topic 1.4

UN Sustainability Summits• Stockholm Summit, 1972

– Considered threats to habitats and species and set targets for protection of natural resources. UNEP was established.

• Rio Earth Summit, 1992 (Agenda 21)– Centred on the conservation of biodiversity. Agenda 21 set

targets for sustainable development in the 21st Century

• Kyoto Summit, 1997– Set targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and

the introduction of renewable energy sources (by 2012). Ultimately this was postponed at the Dohar Summit (2012)

• Johannesburg Summit, 2002– Largely considered the obstacles to sustainable development

posed by global poverty, together with social issues and access to safe drinking water and sanitation

Page 15: Summary of topic 1.4

Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs)

• These became law in the US in 1969 and are being increasingly used around the world

• They are a method of predicting possible impacts on the environment prior to any major project, and helps to decide if it should go ahead

• In some countries they have legal status, in others they just supply information for decision-making (in some they may be ignored in favour of economic benefits)

Page 16: Summary of topic 1.4

Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs)

• The first stage is always a baseline study to assess the status of the environment prior to the project– Habitat types and area– Species present– Biodiversity– List of endangered species– Hydrology– Human population and requirements– Soil types and quality

• The quality of an EIA depends to a large extent on the quality of the baseline study

• All EIAs are speculative to some extent due to the inherent complexities of ecosystems

http://edroness.blogspot.mx/2014/02/environmental-impact-assessment.html

Page 18: Summary of topic 1.4

Ecological Footprint

• An ecological footprint is the hypothetical area of land needed by an individual, group or society to fulfil its resource needs and assimilate all waste

• An ecological footprint is not necessarily sustainable. It may refer to an unstable equilibrium

• A country with a total ecological footprint greater than its available land is in theory living beyond its means (It has an ecological deficit)

Page 19: Summary of topic 1.4

Factors affecting ecological footprint• A large footprint could be caused by:

– Reliance on fossil fuels– Increased use of technology (depending on its use)– High levels of importation– Large production of carbon waste– High food consumption– Meat-rich diets

• Footprint could be reduced by:– Reduced resource consumption– Recycling and reuse of resources– Improved efficiency of resource use– Reduced pollution– Exportation of waste– Use of technology (to increase carrying capacity and efficiency of land use)– Reduced population

Page 20: Summary of topic 1.4
Page 21: Summary of topic 1.4
Page 22: Summary of topic 1.4

Approximate Ecological Footprints (2003)• USA – 10.3 ha cap-1

• Australia – 9.0• Canada – 7.8• Germany – 5.3• UK – 5.2• Switzerland – 5.1• Mexico 3.0 (2007 data)• China – 1.6• India – 0.8

In 2003, there were approx. only 1.8 ha available per person (including productive marine areas). Therefore many of us are living beyond the Earth’s ability to sustain the population

Which country do you think currently has the largest ecological footprint?

Page 23: Summary of topic 1.4

Questions

1. Define the term Natural Capital2. Define the terms Renewable, Replenishable and

Non-renewable3. Explain why resources can be considered to be

dynamic in nature4. Discuss the concept of sustainable development5. Discuss two opposing environmental

philosophies