Upload
idongesit-williams-phd
View
268
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SELF-INTEREST IN INNOVATION DIFFUSION PROCESS
THE CASE OF EXTENDING BROADBAND INTERNET SERVICES TO RURAL AREAS OF GHANA
PAT R I C K O H E M E N G G YA S S E ( P H . D . F E L L O W ) & I D O N G E S I T W I L L I A M S ( P H . D . F E L L O W )C M I , A A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y
PA K W @ C M I . A A U . D K & I D O N G @ C M I . A A U . D K
CONTENTI N T R O D U C I N G
S E L F I N T E R E S TD E C I S I O N
A S S E S S M E N T
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
I NT R O D U C T I O N
T H E I N T E R N E T C A F E I N N O VAT I O N
D I F F U S I O N O F I NN O VAT I O N
I NN O VAT I O N D E C I S I O N P R O C E S S F O R I N T E RN E T C A F E S I N G H A NA
ME T H O D O L O G Y
D ATA A N A LY S I S
C O N C L U S I O N
1.INTRODUCTION Th is research iden t i f i es the ro le o f Se l f In te res t i n dec is ion mak ing
w i th regards to innova t ion D i f fus ion .
I t en r i ches Rogers d i f fus ion o f i nnova t ion canvas by c rea t ing a cons t ruc t to unders tand the dec is i on mak ing p rocess in the adopt ion and fu r ther d i f f us ion o f an innovat ion fo r a techno logy /serv i ce .
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 2 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
The research p rob lem i s , wha t th ink ing p rocess leads to the accep tance o r re jec t ion o f an innova t ion a t the dec is ion mak ing leve l fo r a techno logy /serv i ce ?
To unders tand th i s phenomenon a research was car r ied ou t i n Ghana to unders tand why the in te rne t ca fé innova t i on d i f f used eas i l y i n the c i t i es and no t i n ru ra l a reas .
What fac to rs d id the in te rne t ca fé opera to rs take in to cons idera t ion on where to de l i ve r the innova t ion?
The resu l t was the d iscovery o f the Se l f I n te res t Dec is i on Assessment (S IDA) cons t ruc t .
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 3 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
“INNOVATION IS THE CENTRAL ISSUE IN ECONOMIC
PROSPERITY”- MICHAEL PORTERS .
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 4 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
I n te rne t ca fes or ig ina ted f rom sou th Korea in 1988
The phenomenon go t to the Un i ted S ta tes in 1991
The or ig ina l i n ten t ion was to enab le peop le communica te w i th the in te rne t a t co f fee houses
The presence o f In te rne t Ca fes in the wes t i s on the decrease
I n te rne t Ca fes was adop ted i n A f r i ca f rom the la te 1990 ’s and became preva len t a t the end o f the cen tu ry
The presence o f i n te rne t ca fes in A f r i ca i s on the r i se bu t p reva len t i n the c i t i es and no t ve ry much in ru ra l a reas
The in te rne t ca fé i s an innova t ion because i t was a new so lu t ion dep loyed to meet the in te rne t marke t needs , espec ia l l y fo r those who cou ldn ’ t a f fo rd the serv i ce on the i r own.
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 5 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
2. THE INTERNET CAFE INNOVATION
“ THERE ARE AT LEAST 80 INTERNET CAFES LOCATED IN THE MAJOR CITIES OF GHANA”
- BUSINESSGHANA.COM
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 6 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
Theory popu la r i zed by Rogers
The e lements o f the theory inc lude Innova t ion , Communica t ion Channe ls , t ime and the soc ia l sys tem.
Di f fus ion i s the p rocess in wh i ch an Innovat ion i s communicated th rough cer ta in channe ls over t ime among members o f a socia l system (Rogers , 1995)
Innovat ion : Ideas , p rac t i ce o r ob jec t perce ived as new by the adop te r
Communicated exchange : In fo rmat i on exchange channe l be tween the innova to r and the in tended users
Time : Time d imens ion invo lved i n the per iod o f d i f f us ion
Socia l System : I n te r re la ted un i t s tha t so lve p rob lems toge ther to accompl i sh a common goa l
3. DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 7 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 8 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 9 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
4.INNOVATION DECISION PROCESS FOR
INTERNET CAFES IN GHANA
Knowledge Persuasion Decision Implementation Confirmation
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban
Yes NoYes No No
Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural
Internet Café Operator as an Adopter of
innovation
Internet Café operator as a carrier
of innovationTransforms
Decision process for internet Café operators
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 0 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
“ METHODOLOGY”
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 1 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH IS INTERPRETIV IST
Research approach i s deduc t i ve
Research s t ra tegy i s case s tudy
Research method i s qua l i ta t i ve
Research techn iques inc lude in terv iews and ques t ionna i res (sample : 25 in te rne t ca fé opera to rs in Ghana)
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 2 O F 1 2 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
What a re the fac to rs tha t fac i l i t a te the i r i nves tment i n c i t i es?
Reasons the en t repreneurs don ’ t i nves t i n ru ra l a reas?
What incen t i ves w i l l enab le the en t repreneurs inves t i n the deve lopment o f i n te rne t ca fés in ru ra l a reas?
5. DATA ANALYSIS
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 3 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
There i s a ready demand fo r i n te rne t ca fés
There i s a ava i lab le in f ras t ruc tu re (hence connec t i v i t y )
There i s cons tan t and re l i ab le in te rne t se rv i ce
Hence the cos t o f es tab l i sh ing an in te rne t ca fé i s l ow
Here the i n te rne t ca fé opera to rs can make p ro f i t
Availab
ility o
f Netw
ork Infra
structu
re
Deman
d for In
ternet
Servic
e
Tax Ex
emptions
Cheap o
f Connecti
vity
Low start
-up capita
l require
d
Low cost
of Hard
ware re
quired
Constant a
nd relia
ble Inter
net Ser
vices
Constant a
nd relia
ble Power
Supply
Trained
ICT s
peciali
st, (Profes
sion)
25 25
16
116
16
9 10
0 05
2 3 2 4 6 8
0 0
19 1711
17
2
9 7
Facilitating Factors A I D
A - Agree I - Indifferent D - Disagree
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 4 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
0
25 25 2320
17
23
48
30 0 2
5 3 2
85
22
0 0 0 05
0
13 12
Rural Problems A I D
There i s l i t t l e te lecom in f ras t ruc tu re ava i lab le
There i s l i t t l e o r no demand fo r i n te rne t connec t i v i t y
High cap i ta l expend i tu re
Government i n i t i a t i ves and incent i ves needed to boos t the des i re to i nves t
X = Low infrastructure
X
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 5 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
A - Agree I - Indifferent D - Disagree
URBAN GHANA
NETWORK AVAILABIL ITY AVAILABIL ITY
DEMANDRELIABLE INTERNET SERVICECHEAPER COST OF BANDWIDTH
OPPORTUNITY
LOW START UP CAPITAL COST
PROFITRETURN ON INVESTMENT
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 6 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
RURAL GHANA
NO NETWORK AVAILABIL ITY LOW AVAILABIL ITY
LOW DEMANDUNRELIABLE INTERNET SERVICEHIGH COST OF BANDWIDTH
LOW OPPORTUNITY
HIGH START UP CAPITAL HIGH COST
UNCERTAIN PROFITUNCERTAIN RETURN ON INVESTMENT
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 7 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
Ava i lab i l i t y o f techno logy needed fo r se rv i ce de l i ve ry
Oppor tun i t i es in de l i very o f the serv i ce enab led by the techno logy
Cost o f se rv i ce de l i ve ry
Prof i t ce r ta in ty on de l i ve ry o f se rv i ce
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 8 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
AVAILABIL ITY OPPORTUNITY COST PROFIT
I S T H E T E C H N O L O G Y
F O R T H E I N N O VAT I O N AVA I L A B L E ?
I S T H E R E A N O P P O R T U N I T Y T O I N V E S T I N
T H E I N N O VAT I O N ?
W H AT I S T H E C O S T O F
I N V E S T I N G I N T H E
I N N O VAT I O N ?
W H AT I S T H E R E T U R N O N
I N V E S T M E N T ?
Y E S Y E SL O WY E S
Y E S Y E S / N O M E D I U M U N C E R TA I N
DECISION
A D O P T
U N C E R TA I N
N O N O H I G H N O R E J E C T
W H AT I S T H E I N V E S T M E N T
D E C I S I O N ?
S E L F I N T E R E S T I S E V I D E N T I N T H E D E C I S I O N T O I N V E S T I N I N T E R N E T C A F E S I N G H A N A .
T H E D E C I S I O N T O A D O P T T H E B U S I N E S S M O D E L A N D F U R T H E R D I F F U S E I N T E R N E T P E N E T R AT I O N U S I N G T H E I N T E R N E T C A F É I S H E AV I LY D E P E N D E N T. O N T H E S E L F
I N T E R E S T O F T H E I N T E R N E T C A F É E N T R E P R E N E U R S
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 1 9 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
Knowledge Persuasion Decision Implementation Confirmation
AvailabilityOpportunityCostProfit
Positive
Negative
Low Profitability?
YesNo
SIDA
Decision is Yes
Decision is No
Provide alternative Incentives
Discontinue Innovation
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 2 0 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
048
121620
ADI
Availability Opportunity
Cost Cost
Profit
Market Incentives
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 2 1 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3
A - Agree I - Indifferent D - Disagree
Dec is ion i s a th ink ing p rocess
Dec is ion to accep t o r re jec t an innova t ion i s anchored on se l f i n te res t o f the ma jo r ac to r de l i ve r ing the innova t i on to the soc ia l sys tem
SIDA i s tha t p rocess o f th ink ing in our con tex t o f techno logy and serv i ce adop t ion and d i f f us ion
There i s room fo r more tes ts to va l i da te th i s cons t ruc t
6. CONCLUSION
C M IA A L B O R G U N I V E R S I T Y C O P E N H A G E N
S E L F - I N T E R E S T I N I N N O V A T I O N D I F F U S I O N P R O C E S S – 2 2 O F 2 3 | 1 2 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 3