29
Web literacies Richard Beach

Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Web literaciesRichard Beach

Page 2: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Belshaw book, The Essential

Elements of Digital Literacies Skills are not learned in isolation but

rather developed within a context. Literacies are plural and not neutral

when it comes to power, social identity and political ideology.

There is a continuum of skills, through competencies up to literacies.

Literacies are best taught when the learner can see the whole picture of what they are learning and where they are going (‘progressive encoding’).

Page 3: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Belshaw: 8 Essential Digital

Literacies1. Cultural

2. Cognitive

3. Constructive

4. Communicative

5. Confident

6. Creative

7. Critical

8. Civic

Page 4: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices
Page 5: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Strengths: Web Literacy

Framework Codifies a range of different practices

People lack ability to employ practices

Need to provide online support for use

of these practices

Effective online searches (Leu et al.,

2012)

Page 6: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Limitations: Web Literacy

Framework: Pedagogical

translation? Literacy practices are social

Literary practices are cultural

Use of practices depends on contexts

Example: Collaboration

Example: Digital video

production/remix

Page 7: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Problem: Lack of

collaboration 79% of teachers: digital tools

“encourage greater collaboration

among students”(Purcell, Buchanan, & Freidrich,

2013, p. 3).

But, only one-third of students

engaged in collaborative work in the

classroom

3% reported using video conferencing,

discussion boards, Skype (2013

Gallup survey)

Page 8: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Mozilla: “Teaching Kits”: Remix:

Gendered ads

Page 9: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

boyd (2014): “context

collapse”Contextualizing different

invisible potential audiences

Competing audience agendas

Comments/responses: by

whom?

Page 10: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Critical: Digital identities:

Facebook encourages an identity that is

extroverted, outgoing and even

sometimes narcissistic; most

importantly, one that would be

approved by their peer group. The

pursuit of such an identity made it

difficult for the participants to critically

engage with the site, as they become

immersed in the social reality of

Facebook (Pangrazio, 2013, p. 39).

Page 11: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Web Apps

Apps: Affordances

• Affordances not “in” app

• App Activity

• Affordances created by teachers

• Activity App

Page 12: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices
Page 13: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Transaction: Experiential

learning and tool use (McLain,

2014) “Replicant” apps

◦ replicate or reify ways of learning made

possible by other tools such as flash-

cards or calculators.

“Extender” apps “

◦ “extend the learning experience in ways

not otherwise possible except through

app technology” (p. 196), fostering

alternative learning experiences made

possible through app affordances.

Page 14: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Recontextualization (Van

Leeuwen, 2008) Learning “memes”: Connectivism

(Stephen Downes):

“Knowledge is a network

phenomenon, to “know” something is

to be organized in a certain way, to

exhibit patterns of connectivity. To

“learn” is to acquire certain patterns.

This is as true for a community as it is

for an individual.”

Page 15: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Steps in recontextualizing (Blommaert,

2005)

● Decontextualizing: removed from

context

● Recontextualizing:

● place in new context

● Entextualizing:

● analyze as new text

Page 16: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices
Page 17: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Nexus analysis: Meaning of

memes

Page 18: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices
Page 19: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices
Page 20: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices
Page 21: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

VoiceThread: Multiple audiences

share responses to images

Page 22: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

“Instructional Chain”

Mapping: contrasting concepts

Diigo: analyzing formulated arguments

VoiceThread: building arguments using

images based on carbon chains

Google Docs: drawing on all of what

they have learned

Page 23: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices
Page 24: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Voyant: www.voyeurtools.org Analysis

of Moby Dick

Page 25: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Use of data to inform

interpretation

whale

Ahab

Page 26: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Readers’ connections

Page 27: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Reviewers’ connections on Amazon:

Infinite Jest

Page 28: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Web 2.0 (Aghaei, Nematbakhsh.

& Farsani, IJWesTn, 2012)

Page 29: Responses to Doug Belshaw's LRA Presentation on Web Literaices

Web 3.0 (Aghaei, Nematbakhsh.

& Farsani, IJWesTn, 2012)