45
Reframing Languages: Short films for MFL Mark Reid BFI Education [email protected] www.bfi.org.uk

Reframing Languages

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reframing Languages

Reframing Languages:Short films for MFL

Mark ReidBFI Education

[email protected]

Page 2: Reframing Languages

About the B

FI..

archive and library

cinematheque

festivals

film production and distribution

publishing

Page 3: Reframing Languages

And BFI Education

Page 4: Reframing Languages

from Reframing Literacy…

• EYFS - KS3• 61 LAs• 7 DVDs• Research and evaluation

(Moving Literacy On, Marsh and Bearne)

• Big impacts on literacy

Page 5: Reframing Languages

… to Reframing Languages

• French shorts• Cineminis DVD in

October 2010• KS2/3• Esmee Fairbairn

research with IoE on Year 8 French

Page 6: Reframing Languages

… to Screening Languages (2013-15)

• 6 schools/ 12 teachers

• Hounslow, Barking&Dagenham, Lambeth

• Year 8 • French and Spanish

• 20 schools/ 30 teachers

• 5 LAs, Teaching School Alliances, academy chains

• KS3• French, Spanish,

German, Mandarin

Year 1 Year 2

Page 7: Reframing Languages

Why film?

Page 8: Reframing Languages

Why film?

• ‘Comprehensible input’ and ‘forms of life’

• Culturally rich language context

• Engagement for children

Page 9: Reframing Languages

Why shorts?

• New to children

• Manageability

• High quality - cinematic

Page 10: Reframing Languages

Shorts pedagogy

• ‘Tell Me’ grids - in target language

• Hiding and revealing

• Stopping and starting

Page 11: Reframing Languages

character setting

StoryQu’est-ce qu’il se passe

Mood

ambience

Qui? Ou? Quand?

‘Tell Me’ grids

Aidan Chambers/ CLPE

Page 12: Reframing Languages

(Hide the screen and play the DVD, Mark)

Page 13: Reframing Languages

puzzles patterns

surprises predictions

Page 14: Reframing Languages

Value for teachers • Develops new pedagogical knowledge and

approaches• Develops their knowledge of and confidence in

exploring film as a cultural medium• Changes their expectations of pupils in terms of

attainment• Enables them to integrate more effectively cultural

awareness into their teaching• Confidence to take risks - experimentation• Imagination and originality• Motivation and professional development

Page 15: Reframing Languages

Value for pupils

• Improves motivation towards learning another language

• Improves attainment in listening, speaking, reading and writing

• Develops cultural knowledge and interest in film as a cultural form

• Encourages them to continue learning a language at Key Stage 4

Page 16: Reframing Languages

Speaking skillsduring viewing

• Learners report phrases with or without help of teacher/sub-title e.g. on poster or PP

• ‘Predictive speech’ - what is he/she going to say/do?

• Learner originated questions• Descriptions and summaries while the

film is running (no sound)

Page 17: Reframing Languages

Speaking skillsafter viewing

• Discussion of film – likes/dislikes re characters, aspects of film

• Information gap activities and role play• Storyboard - continuing the story, alternative

endings• Guessing games: describing characters/events• Re-sequencing mixed-up stills from film,

relating correct sequence

Page 18: Reframing Languages

Writing

•Storyboarding•Sub-titles•Prediction•Alternative ending

Page 19: Reframing Languages

http://screeninglanguages.wordpress.com

Page 20: Reframing Languages

Film resources for MFL• Kirikou et la Sorciere (1998, Fr, West African, BFI

films; dir Michel Ocelot); also Azur and Azmar/ The Prince’s Quest by same director

• BFI shorts: Starting Stories 1&2 and Story Shorts 1&2

• Cine-minis DVD• DVD of Courts Metrages: Courts de Recre and

Enfantillages, Institut Francais - [email protected]

• ALL yahoo group on using film via Helen Myers• BFI Southbank and Sheffield Showroom cinema days

on using film with MFL at KS2-KS5• http://screeninglanguages.wordpress.com

Page 21: Reframing Languages
Page 22: Reframing Languages

Le Cinema, cent ans de jeunesse

A film programme around camera movement

Cinematheque Francaise/ BFI

Page 23: Reframing Languages

Le cinema, cent ans de jeunesse

• Since 1995; 100th anniversary of cinema• Annual film-making programme• Exercises, film viewing, final ‘film essai’• Aspect of film language - light; composition;

colour; camera movement• 2010/11 ‘On/ Offscreen’ • 25 workshops: France, Spain, Portugal, Italy,

England

Page 24: Reframing Languages

Shape of the programme

• Training in Paris in October/ November • Exercises carried out November - February• Review of exercises in March• Final films ready end May; Paris screening in June;

London in July• 1 or 2 hours a week workshops; optionally after

school or in curriculum (BTEC and GCSE)• Viewing as well as making (2xDVDs of clips)• Optional student mentors via AimHigher

Page 25: Reframing Languages

Resources and support

• Training - 2 or 3 days• 2 DVDs of clips - extensive ‘typologie’

with for eg 15 variations on camera movement• Mentors - AimHigher• Blog:

http://100ans.cinematheque.fr/100ans20092010/• And BFI blog: http://markreid1895.wordpress.com

Page 26: Reframing Languages

2009/ 2010

• Why move the camera? Pourquoi bouge le camera?

• How many types of camera movement are there?

Page 27: Reframing Languages

Types of camera movement• Describing character:

– Sequences of characters– Establishing one character– Following– showing impuslive movement

• Describing space:– Travelling– Panoramic– changing spaces– ubiquity

Page 28: Reframing Languages

Types of camera movement..

• Centring• Decentring• Poetic• Motifs - stairs

Page 29: Reframing Languages

character mood

setting camera

Page 30: Reframing Languages
Page 31: Reframing Languages

Camera movement

• The Shining (Kubrick, 1980)• Everyone Says I Love You (Allen, 1996)• Project 1(Forbes, 2009)• Elephant (van Sant, 2003)• July (Omirbaev, 1988)

Page 32: Reframing Languages

Camera movement project

• Exercise 1a travelling shot taken from a vehicle, less than a minute long, maybe with a mobile phone

• Exercise 2a static shot of a moving objecta moving shot of a static objecta static shot of a static objecta moving shot of a moving object

Page 33: Reframing Languages

Camera movement programme.. Cont’d

• Exercise 3Subject A moves towards subject B, looking

agitated. He/she continues past subject B and meets subject C, while subject B moves away in the opposite direction. Less than 5 minutes long

• Final FilmA person is filmed coming to a sudden

realisation; the emotional impact of the realisation is communicated by shots from a moving camera

Page 34: Reframing Languages

Exercises trailer

http://100ans.cinematheque.fr/100ans20092010/?p=639

Page 35: Reframing Languages

Some films we made earlier..

London Nautical

• Vision• Disappear• Betrayal• The Job Thief

Lambeth Academy

• Rough and Tumble/ The worst day of my life

Wandsworth CLC

• Almost

Page 36: Reframing Languages

Montrer/ cacher

BFI/ Cinematheque programme 2010/11

Page 37: Reframing Languages

‘le secret’enigma

mysteryFilming the back

Offscreen/ onscreen

ellipsis

censorship

Hiding in the frame

Actors concealing emotion

Threat of the invisible

Dramatic irony

Shadows/ light

Page 38: Reframing Languages

• Not showing implies something is being denied, something is lacking and needs to be filled

• Long shots deepen the element of mystery• Impact of filming specific characters with their backs turned, denying the

audience its view• The illicitness of a distorted, muffled, overheard conversation, a half closed

door. Balance of foreground / background interest• Surprise element/comedic value of a disembodied voice and the consequences

of an “off” action coming into view• Showing without showing – sound only, shrouding action with curtain, shadows,

limb of a body• Momentum and interest is maintained by strategically obscuring the naked body

with objects• One ‘running commentary’ scene replaces another that you ‘should’ be seeing• Fly-on-the-wall style filming, ‘hidden’ camera filming of the everyday, we are

privy to the apparent mundaneness of going up and down the stairs continually following the back of a character. Heavy door denies grandma the view of her grandchild, the gender of whom she rejects

Some notes from Paris..

Page 39: Reframing Languages

• Camera void of ceiling is filled with sound and characters’ faces come to fill the void in closeup. Only glimpses of the birds, lots of clamourous sound (The Birds)

• Use of abstract sound and light to evoke mystery. “Off” action with the subsequent evidence of an unseen act of violence. Symbol of the bristling cat instead of “the thing” itself (Cat People)

• Obscuring of actors’ faces arouses doubt and uncertainty as to motivation

• Doubt and the evocation of the surreal through use of fog and mysteriously positioned bull (Amarcord)

• Shading in black and white, lighting, semi-darkness – fear of having one’s suspicions confirmed – semi-concealed monster, the hole in the bag. You want him to reveal himself but you don’t want to look. Horror genre. (Elephant Man)

• Ellipses. Murder action replaced by landscapes. Making the audience wait for the result. The long sweeping preamble before the dramatic revelation: ‘Rosemary’s Baby’ & ‘To Die For’

• Sound characterises a space, what you don’t hear is significant, sound can cut out to signify enclosed space

Page 40: Reframing Languages

Cinema, cent ans de jeunesse 2010/2011Workshop Brief ‘Montrer/ Cacher’

Introductory exercises

Individual exercise (can be done at home)Make a portrait out of different facets of someone you know well: both/either between 3-6 photographs or filmed as a series of short shots (total 2 minutes duration). Each photo or shot should show only a partial characteristic of the person – both physically and from their personality (a part of the body; a familiar object, a shot from behind, use of light and shadow; blurring the image; different scales within the shot..). At the end, the person mustn’t be identifiable, but overall is evoked, suggested..

Page 41: Reframing Languages

Collective exercises1 Film an action completely in close-up (total duration

no more than 3 minutes and 8 shots maximum). Indicative story line: ‘Person A moves from space into another adjacent space, then gives something to Person B. You choose what is given (a codeword; a kiss; a curse; a gift; a warning) and which spaces you use.

2 Film a complete short scene (maximum 3 minutes) where someone in shot reacts against something or someone outside the shot, which we never see but know of through sound, light, reaction shots and the direction of the gaze, or a reflection

Page 42: Reframing Languages

The film essai (8 minutes maximum)

Indicative scenario: Two secrets, of which one is revealed, the other withheld.

The main rule, which shouldn’t be given to the students until after they have scripted their scenario:

Once the scenario has been written, students have to choose one of the key scenes that will not be shown. The scene should still play an important role in the story, but won’t be filmed, just suggested (through an ellipsis, or use of offscreen sound, reflections, camera movement which hides or reveals, or a substitution of action in the edit)

Page 43: Reframing Languages

blogs

https://markreid1895.wordpress.com/

http://100ans.cinematheque.fr/100ans20092010/

Page 44: Reframing Languages

Exercise from Lambeth

Page 45: Reframing Languages

Films citedCat People (USA, Jacques Tourneur, 1942)The Circle (Iran, Jafar Panahi, 2000)He Dies at the End (Damian McCarthy, Youtube, added2008)Elephant Man (David Lynch, 1982)After Tomorrow (Emma Sullivan, 2009)Virus (Simon Hynd, 2002)Moonfleet (USA, Fritz Lang, 1955)Creature from the Black Lagoon (USA, Jack Arnold,1954)