Upload
cjlortie
View
179
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PBLT
problem-based learning & testing
@cjlortie
mimetic solving
versus
mimetic
connection to otherspractical
typically memorynetworked concepts
memoryis nonetheless
practicalapplication
domain-levelknowledge
problem-based learning
longer work cyclechallenge or problem provide context
higher complexityideally: open and collaborative
authenticreal need for a solution
integrationpracticalpractice
leverage training & concepts
student centeredlong-term retention
develops practical skills
testing
key testing design elements
PBLT is open, collaborative, with adequate time providedunique challenges are more successful
use both modalitiesclear instructionsprovide choices
key solution elements from grading ecology PBLT
3D marking key
conceptsvocabulary and keywords
application
show what you knowbe logical
ensure solution directly links to problemexperiments need to be testable and provide evidence for hypothesis
explain implications of solution
solution best practices
specific examples
A case of stability. Four hypotheses have been proposed to explain the relationship between diversity and function. Explain each (4 points).
Each is not however equally likely to apply to every ecosystem or even within a region. Design an experiment that explicitly tests this
hypothesis set (and contrasts them) that you could practically apply to a region like grasslands in Southern Ontario (areas of Downsview Park or YorkU campus for instance) to determine how species richness and ecological function might relate and how we should thus manage the species in the region that we live and study in (6 points: 4 for a solid
design linked to the hypotheses and then 2 points for the management of species).
experiment must test two factorsdriver and passenger and complementarity
experiment must be able to address hypothesis and contrast predictions
full factorial
must test different number of species
logical and viable
A case failure to connect. Ecology and conservation biology seem like very similar disciplines of science. However, in the paper by Srivastava,
numerous limitations in connecting the best possible ecology to conservation are listed. In other words, ecology is failing to be practical!
Not going to happen to us. We know that principled data, useful hypotheses and theories, testable predictions, and framing the scope of
inference more broadly ensure that ecology is practical. Given our focus on this approach, we should also be able to connect ecology to restoration ecology like Srivastava did in her paper for conservation.
Explain the difference between restoration and conservation (2 points). Explain the solutions that Srivastava proposed for ecologists to
consider to better help conservation biologists work with BDEF (2 points). Now, similar to what she did, propose three questions that ecologists could answer for ecologists to consider that will make
restoration more effective in working with biodiversity (6 points: 2 for each question including how each one improves restoration).
restoration must be clearly defined and different from conservation
solutions were extensive but also needed explanation
novel questions must demonstrate critical thinking and be testable by ecologists
A case of different mindsets. Parmesan and Yohe do a fantastic job of explaining and summarizing global change, how to simplify it, and how
different experts might think about global change really differently. Explain the challenge that the IPCC report faced with people and
experts in different disciplines (4). Then, the solution they provided is amazing. It is worth explain it to in your own words for the reader or
anyone (another 4). Then, for the last two points, tell me, did this work for you? Did it convince you that global change is real and if so how could you apply this process to the decisions you have to make in
evaluating evidence for any topic? (final 2 points).
climate change is correlational
knowing varies between disciplines
climate change must be tested in more than one way
must generalize approach to any evidence
different tools for different disciplines